This document has not been cited yet.

1. Allcott, H. Rethinking real-time electricity pricing. 2011 Resour. Energy Econ.. 33 820-842

2. Atkinson, A.B. ; Rainwater, L. ; Smeeding, T.M. Income Distribution in European Countries: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study. 1995 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris, France
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Boeri, M. ; Longo, A. The importance of regret minimization in the choice for renewable energy programmes: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment. 2017 Energy Econ.. 63 253-260

4. Borenstein, S. The economics of fixed cost recovery by utilities. 2016 Electr. J.. 29 5-12
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Borenstein, S. The long-run efficiency of real-time electricity pricing. 2005 Energy J.. 26 -

6. Borenstein, S. ; Bushnell, J. Do two electricity pricing wrongs make a right? Cost recovery, externalities, and efficiency. 2018 National Bureau of Economic Research:

7. Boyle, K.J. ; Özdemir, S. Convergent validity of attribute-based choice questions in stated-preference studies. 2008 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 42 247-264
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Brouwer, A.S. ; van den Broek, M. ; Zappa, W. ; Turkenburg, W.C. ; Faaij, A. Least-cost options for integrating intermittent renewables in low-carbon power systems. 2016 Appl. Energy. 161 48-74

9. Burger, S.P. ; Knittel, C.R. ; Perez-Arriaga, I.J. ; Schneider, I. ; vom Scheidt, F. The efficiency and distributional effects of alternative residential electricity rate designs. 2020 Energy J.. 41 -

10. Burns, K. ; Mountain, B. Do households respond to time-of-use tariffs? evidence from australia. 2021 Energy Econ.. 95 -

11. Buryk, S. ; Mead, D. ; Mourato, S. ; Torriti, J. Investigating preferences for dynamic electricity tariffs: The effect of environmental and system benefit disclosure. 2015 Energy Policy. 80 190-195

12. Campbell, R.M. ; Venn, T.J. ; Anderson, N.M. Heterogeneity in preferences for woody biomass energy in the US mountain west. 2018 Ecol. Econom.. 145 27-37

13. Davis, A.L. ; Krishnamurti, T. ; Fischhoff, B. ; de Bruin, W.B. Setting a standard for electricity pilot studies. 2013 Energy Policy. 62 401-409

14. Dunlap, R. ; Liere, K.V. ; Mertig, A. ; Jones, R.E. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. 2000 J. Soc. Issues. 56 425-442
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Dütschke, E. ; Paetz, A.G. Dynamic electricity pricing —which programs do consumers prefer?. 2013 Energy Policy. 59 226-234

16. Dutta, G. ; Mitra, K. A literature review on dynamic pricing of electricity. 2017 J. Oper. Res. Soc.. 68 1131-1145

17. Fabra, N., Rapson, D., Reguant, M., Wang, J., 2021. Estimating the elasticity to real-time pricing: Evidence from the spanish electricity market. In: AEA Papers and Proceedings 111. pp. 425–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211007.

18. Fait, L. ; Groh, E.D. ; Wetzel, H. “I take the green one”: The choice of regional green electricity contracts in the light of regional and environmental identity. 2022 Energy Policy. 163 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Falk, A. ; Becker, A. ; Dohmen, T. ; Enke, B. ; Huffman, D. ; Sunde, U. Global evidence on economic preferences. 2018 Q. J. Econ.. 133 1645-1692

20. Falk, A. ; Becker, A. ; Dohmen, T.J. ; Huffman, D. ; Sunde, U. The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. 2016 SSRN Electron. J.. -

21. Faruqui, A. ; Harris, D. ; Hledik, R. Unlocking the €53 billion savings from smart meters in the EU: How increasing the adoption of dynamic tariffs could make or break the EU’s smart grid investment. 2010 Energy Policy. 38 6222-6231
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action, Press release: The cabinet adopts relaunch of the digitisation of the energy transition and paves the way for accelerated smart meter rollout. 2024 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. Feldman, N.E. Time is money: Choosing between charitable activities. 2010 Am. Econ. J.: Econ. Policy. 2 103-130

24. Fisher, S. ; Flynn, C. ; Grant, Z. ; Kirby, M. ; Snow, D. ; Yamasumi, E. Peoples’ climate vote – results, united nations development programme (UNDP). 2021 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. Fowlie, M. ; Wolfram, C. ; Baylis, P. ; Spurlock, C.A. ; Todd-Blick, A. ; Cappers, P. Default effects and follow-on behaviour: Evidence from an electricity pricing program. 2021 Rev. Econ. Stud.. 88 2886-2934

26. Freier, J. ; von Loessl, V. Dynamic electricity tariffs: Designing reasonable pricing schemes for private households. 2022 Energy Econ.. 112 -

27. Gambardella, C. ; Pahle, M. Time-varying electricity pricing and consumer heterogeneity: Welfare and distributional effects with variable renewable supply. 2018 Energy Econ.. 76 257-273

28. Gambardella, C. ; Pahle, M. ; Schill, W.P. Do benefits from dynamic tariffing rise? Welfare effects of real-time retail pricing under carbon taxation and variable renewable electricity supply. 2019 Environ. Resour. Econ.. 75 183-213
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Gelazanskas, L. ; Gamage, K.A. Demand side management in smart grid: A review and proposals for future direction. 2014 Sustainable Cities Soc.. 11 22-30
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Glenk, K. ; Meyerhoff, J. ; Akaichi, F. ; Martin-Ortega, J. Revisiting cost vector effects in discrete choice experiments. 2019 Resour. Energy Econ.. 57 135-155

31. Grutters, J.P. ; Kessels, A.G. ; Dirksen, C.D. ; van Helvoort-Postulart, D. ; Anteunis, L.J. ; Joore, M.A. Willingness to accept versus willingness to pay in a discrete choice experiment. 2008 Value in Health. 11 1110-1119
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Gutsche, G. ; Ziegler, A. Which private investors are willing to pay for sustainable investments? Empirical evidence from stated choice experiments. 2019 J. Bank. Financ.. 102 193-214
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Hess, S. ; Hensher, D.A. Making use of respondent reported processing information to understand attribute importance: a latent variable scaling approach. 2012 Transportation. 40 397-412
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

34. Hole, A.R. A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures. 2007 Health Econ.. 16 827-840

35. Hole, A.R. Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood. 2007 Stata j.. 7 388-401

36. Holland, S.P. ; Mansur, E.T. The short-run effects of time-varying prices in competitive electricity markets. 2006 Energy J.. 27 -

37. Holmes, T.P. ; Adamowicz, W.L. ; Carlsson, F. Choice experiments. 2017 En : A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Springer: Netherlands
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

38. Hoyos, D. The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments. 2010 Ecol. Econom.. 69 1595-1603

39. Huh, S.Y. ; Woo, J. ; Lim, S. ; Lee, Y.G. ; Kim, C.S. What do customers want from improved residential electricity services? evidence from a choice experiment. 2015 Energy Policy. 85 410-420

40. IEA, Deployment To Date of Residential Smart Meters. 2021 International Energy Agency: Paris
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

41. Ito, K. ; Ida, T. ; Tanaka, M. Selection on welfare gains: Experimental evidence from electricity plan choice. 2021 National Bureau of Economic Research:

42. Jessoe, K. ; Rapson, D. Knowledge is (less) power: Experimental evidence from residential energy use. 2014 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 104 1417-1438

43. Kaenzig, J. ; Heinzle, S.L. ; Wüstenhagen, R. Whatever the customer wants the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in germany. 2013 Energy Policy. 53 311-322

44. Kahneman, D. ; Tversky, A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. 1979 Econometrica. 47 -

45. Kowalska-Pyzalska, A. ; Maciejowska, K. ; Suszczyński, K. ; Sznajd-Weron, K. ; Weron, R. Turning green: Agent-based modeling of the adoption of dynamic electricity tariffs. 2014 Energy Policy. 72 164-174

46. Krinsky, I. ; Robb, A.L. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. 1986 Rev. Econ. Stat.. 68 -

47. Leautier, T.O. Is mandating “smart meters” smart?. 2014 Energy J.. 35 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. McFadden, D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. 1973 En : Zarembka, P. Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press: New York
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

49. Mengelkamp, E. ; Schönland, T. ; Huber, J. ; Weinhardt, C. The value of local electricity - a choice experiment among german residential customers. 2019 Energy Policy. 130 294-303

50. Morita, T. ; Managi, S. Consumers’ willingness to pay for electricity after the great east Japan earthquake. 2015 Econ. Anal. Policy. 48 82-105

51. Murakami, K. ; Ida, T. ; Tanaka, M. ; Friedman, L. Consumers’ willingness to pay for renewable and nuclear energy: A comparative analysis between the US and Japan. 2015 Energy Econ.. 50 178-189

52. Nakai, M. ; Okubo, T. ; Kikuchi, Y. A socio-technical analysis of consumer preferences about energy systems applying a simulation-based approach: A case study of the Tokyo area. 2018 Energy Res. Soc. Sci.. 46 52-63
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Ozaki, R. Follow the price signal: People’s willingness to shift household practices in a dynamic time-of-use tariff trial in the United Kingdom. 2018 Energy Res. Soc. Sci.. 46 10-18
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

54. Pebéreau, C., Remmy, K., 2022. Barriers to real-time electricity pricing: Evidence from new zealand, Discussion Paper Series - CRC TR 224. Discussion Paper No. 339.

55. Pepermans, G. Valuing smart meters. 2014 Energy Econ.. 45 280-294

56. Poe, G.L. ; Giraud, K.L. ; Loomis, J.B. Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions. 2005 Am. J. Agric. Econ.. 87 353-365

57. REA, Energy Transition Readiness Index. 2023 Association for Renewable Energy & Clean Technology: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

58. Richter, L.L. ; Pollitt, M.G. Which smart electricity service contracts will consumers accept? The demand for compensation in a platform market. 2018 Energy Econ.. 72 436-450

59. Ritchie, H. ; Roser, M. Energy, Our World in Data. 2021 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

60. Ruokamo, E. ; Kopsakangas-Savolainen, M. ; Meriläinen, T. ; Svento, R. Towards flexible energy demand –preferences for dynamic contracts, services and emissions reductions. 2019 Energy Econ.. 84 -

61. Schlereth, C. ; Skiera, B. ; Schulz, F. Why do consumers prefer static instead of dynamic pricing plans? An empirical study for a better understanding of the low preferences for time-variant pricing plans. 2018 European J. Oper. Res.. 269 1165-1179

62. Schwirplies, C. ; Dütschke, E. ; Schleich, J. ; Ziegler, A. The willingness to offset CO2 emissions from traveling: Findings from discrete choice experiments with different framings. 2019 Ecol. Econom.. 165 -

63. Shariatzadeh, F. ; Mandal, P. ; Srivastava, A.K. Demand response for sustainable energy systems: A review application and implementation strategy. 2015 Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.. 45 343-350

64. Sovacool, B.K. ; Hook, A. ; Sareen, S. ; Geels, F.W. Global sustainability innovation and governance dynamics of national smart electricity meter transitions. 2021 Global Environ. Change. 68 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
65. Stamminger, R. ; Anstett, V. Effectiveness of Demand Side Management By Variable Energy Tariffs in the Households —ReSults of an Experimental Design with a Fictive Tariff Model. 2013 ECEEE Summer Study:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

66. Whitmarsh, L. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? the role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. 2008 J. Risk Res.. 11 351-374

67. Wolak, F.A. Do residential customers respond to hourly prices? Evidence from a dynamic pricing experiment. 2011 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 101 83-87

68. World Bank, World Development Indicators, Gross Domestic Product 2020. 2022 The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

69. Yoshida, Y. ; Tanaka, K. ; Managi, S. Which dynamic pricing rule is most preferred by consumers?—Application of choice experiment. 2017 J. Econo. Struct.. -

70. Zhou, F. ; Zheng, Z. ; Whitehead, J. ; Washington, S. ; Perrons, R.K. ; Page, L. Preference heterogeneity in mode choice for car-sharing and shared automated vehicles. 2020 Transp. Res. Part A: Policy and Practice. 132 633-650

71. Ziegler, A. Political orientation environmental values, and climate change beliefs and attitudes: An empirical cross country analysis. 2017 Energy Econ.. 63 144-153

1. The Dynamic Impacts of Pricing Groundwater. (2023). Bruno, Ellen ; Hanemann, Michael ; Jessoe, Katrina K.
   In: Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series.
   RePEc:cdl:agrebk:qt2mx8q1td.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Retailers strategies facing demand response and markets interactions. (2020). Khalfallah, Haikel ; Clastres, Cedric.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03167543.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. An adverse selection approach to power pricing. (2019). Elie, Romuald ; Santib, Nicol'As Hern'Andez ; Ekeland, Ivar ; Possamai, Dylan ; Alasseur, Cl'Emence.
   In: Papers.
   RePEc:arx:papers:1706.01934.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Which dynamic pricing rule is most preferred by consumers?—Application of choice experiment. (2017). Tanaka, Kenta ; Managi, Shunsuke ; Yoshida, Yumi.
   In: Journal of Economic Structures.
   RePEc:spr:jecstr:v:6:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1186_s40008-017-0064-0.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Power to the people: Electricity demand and household behavior. (2017). Vesterberg, Mattias.
   In: Umeå Economic Studies.
   RePEc:hhs:umnees:0942.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Heterogeneity in price responsiveness of electricity: Contract choice and the role of media coverage. (2017). Vesterberg, Mattias.
   In: Umeå Economic Studies.
   RePEc:hhs:umnees:0940.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Risk preference and adverse selection for participation in time-of-use electricity pricing programs. (2017). Qiu, Yueming ; Colson, Gregory ; Wetzstein, Michael E.
   In: Resource and Energy Economics.
   RePEc:eee:resene:v:47:y:2017:i:c:p:126-142.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. An overview of Demand Response: Key-elements and international experience. (2017). Erdin, Ozan ; Paterakis, Nikolaos G.
   In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
   RePEc:eee:rensus:v:69:y:2017:i:c:p:871-891.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Nudges from school children and electricity conservation: Evidence from the “Project Carbon Zero” campaign in Singapore. (2017). Sing, Tien Foo ; Yang, Yang ; Agarwal, Sumit ; Rengarajan, Satyanarain.
   In: Energy Economics.
   RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:61:y:2017:i:c:p:29-41.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Real-time electricity pricing for industrial customers: Survey and case studies in the United States. (2017). Wang, Yong ; Nezamoddini, Nasim.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:195:y:2017:i:c:p:1023-1037.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Modelling revenue generation in a dynamically priced mobile telephony service. (2016). Kilmartin, Liam ; Brown, Kenneth N ; Wang, Han ; Fay, Damien.
    In: Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management.
    RePEc:spr:telsys:v:62:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11235-015-0106-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Model-based assessment of demand-response measures—A comprehensive literature review. (2016). Bossmann, Tobias ; Eser, Eike Johannes.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:1637-1656.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Behavioral aspects of regulation: A discussion on switching and demand response in Turkish electricity market. (2016). ŞİRİN, Selahattin ; Sirin, Selahattin Murat ; Gonul, Mustafa Sinan.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:97:y:2016:i:c:p:591-602.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. A framework for siting and dispatch of emerging energy resources to realize environmental and health benefits: Case study on peaker power plant displacement. (2016). , Seth ; Casey, Joan A ; Krieger, Elena M.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:96:y:2016:i:c:p:302-313.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. The potential of energy behaviours in a smart(er) grid: Policy implications from a Portuguese exploratory study. (2016). Peixoto, Paulo ; Martins, Nelson ; Janda, Kathryn B ; Antunes, Carlos Henggeler.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:90:y:2016:i:c:p:233-245.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. The hourly income elasticity of electricity. (2016). Vesterberg, Mattias.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:59:y:2016:i:c:p:188-197.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Is our everyday comfort for sale? Preferences for demand management on the electricity market. (2016). Broberg, Thomas ; Persson, Lars.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:54:y:2016:i:c:p:24-32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. An optimal time-of-use pricing for urban gas: A study with a multi-agent evolutionary game-theoretic perspective. (2016). Hailu, Atakelty ; Zhu, Kejun ; Tang, Kai ; Gong, Chengzhu.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:163:y:2016:i:c:p:283-294.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Do Benefits from Dynamic Tariffing Rise? Welfare Effects of Real-Time Pricing under Carbon-Tax-Induced Variable Renewable Energy Supply. (2016). Schill, Wolf-Peter ; Pahle, Michael ; Gambardella, Christian.
    In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
    RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp1621.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Electricity demand response in Japan: Experimental evidence from a residential photovoltaic power-generation system. (2016). Tanaka, Makoto ; Ida, Takanori ; Takanori, Kayo Murakami .
    In: Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy.
    RePEc:aen:eeepjl:eeep5-1-ida.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. The Environmental Impacts of Fuel Switching Power Plants. (2015). Holladay, J ; Soloway, Steven.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ten:wpaper:2015-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Electricity demand response in Japan:Experimental evidence from a residential photovoltaic generation system. (2015). Tanaka, Makoto ; Murakami, Kayo ; Ida, Takanori.
    In: Discussion papers.
    RePEc:kue:dpaper:e-15-006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. The Rebound Effect and Energy Efficiency Policy. (2015). Wagner, Gernot ; Rapson, David ; Gillingham, Kenneth.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2014.107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Time-based electricity pricing for large-volume customers: A comparison of two buildings under tariff alternatives. (2015). Hagen, William T ; Yalcintas, Melek ; Kaya, Abidin .
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:37:y:2015:i:c:p:58-68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Which electricity market design to encourage the development of demand response?. (2015). Roques, Fabien ; Perez, Yannick ; Rious, Vincent.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:48:y:2015:i:c:p:128-138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Comparison of control systems for the optimisation of ice storage in a dynamic real time electricity pricing environment. (2015). OMahony, M. J. ; Murphy, M. D. ; Upton, J..
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:149:y:2015:i:c:p:392-403.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Strategies to mitigate declines in the economic value of wind and solar at high penetration in California. (2015). Wiser, Ryan H. ; Mills, Andrew D..
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:147:y:2015:i:c:p:269-278.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Assessing the impact of changes in the electricity price structure on dairy farm energy costs. (2015). Murphy, M. ; Shalloo, L. ; Upton, J. ; Groot Koerkamp, P. W. G., ; de Boer, I. J. M., .
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:137:y:2015:i:c:p:1-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Minimising costs and variability of electricity generation by means of optimal electricity interconnection utilisation. (2014). Tol, Richard ; Lynch, Muireann ; OMalley, Mark J..
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:sus:susewp:6814.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Benefits and challenges of electrical demand response: A critical review. (2014). Pinson, Pierre ; OConnell, Niamh ; Omalley, Mark ; Madsen, Henrik.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:39:y:2014:i:c:p:686-699.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Dynamic salience with intermittent billing: Evidence from smart electricity meters. (2014). Graff Zivin, Joshua ; Gilbert, Ben.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:107:y:2014:i:pa:p:176-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Is Mandating Smart Meters Smart?. (2014). Léautier, Thomas-Olivier ; Leautier, Thomas-Olivier.
    In: The Energy Journal.
    RePEc:aen:journl:ej35-4-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Estimating the Impact of Time-of-Use Pricing on Irish Electricity Demand. (2014). Nolan, Anne ; Lyons, Sean ; Di Cosmo, Valeria ; Valeria Di Cosmo, Sean Lyons,, .
    In: The Energy Journal.
    RePEc:aen:journl:ej35-2-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. The Impact of Dynamic Pricing on Residential and Small Commercial and Industrial Usage: New Experimental Evidence from Connecticut. (2014). Akaba, Lamine ; Ahmad Faruqui, Sanem Sergici,, .
    In: The Energy Journal.
    RePEc:aen:journl:ej35-1-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. How to engage consumers in demand response: a contract perspective. (2013). Meeus, Leonardo ; Glachant, Jean-Michel ; He, Xian ; Keyaerts, Nico ; Isabel Azevedo, Leonardo Meeus, Leigh Hancher, Jea, .
    In: RSCAS Working Papers.
    RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2013/76.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Grid integration and smart grid implementation of emerging technologies in electric power systems through approximate dynamic programming. (2013). Xiao, Jingjie.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:58696.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Real-time Pricing in Power Markets: Who Gains?. (2013). Schwenen, Sebastian ; Boom, Anette.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:cbsnow:2013_001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. How to engage consumers in demand response: A contract perspective. (2013). Meeus, Leonardo ; Glachant, Jean-Michel ; Keyaerts, Nico ; Hancher, Leigh ; Azevedo, Isabel.
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:27:y:2013:i:c:p:108-122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City. (2013). Powers, Susan E. ; Gilbraith, Nathaniel.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:59:y:2013:i:c:p:459-469.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Dynamic electricity pricing—Which programs do consumers prefer?. (2013). Dutschke, Elisabeth ; Paetz, Alexandra-Gwyn.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:59:y:2013:i:c:p:226-234.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Market-driven coal prices and state-administered electricity prices in China. (2013). Zhang, Yang ; Liu, Ming-Hua ; Margaritis, Dimitris.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:40:y:2013:i:c:p:167-175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Real-time Pricing in Power Markets: Who Gains?. (2012). Schwenen, Sebastian ; Boom, Anette.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2012 (Goettingen): New Approaches and Challenges for the Labor Market of the 21st Century.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc12:66062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Is mandating smart meters smart?. (2012). Léautier, Thomas-Olivier.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:26343.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Knowledge is (Less) Power: Experimental Evidence from Residential Energy Use. (2012). Rapson, David ; Jessoe, Katrina.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:18344.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Survey of Models on Demand, Customer Base-Line and Demand Response and Their Relationships in the Power Market. (2012). Heshmati, Almas.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp6637.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Is mandating smart meters smart?. (2012). Léautier, Thomas-Olivier.
    In: IDEI Working Papers.
    RePEc:ide:wpaper:26342.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. An indeterminate future: Assessing the need for greater US–Canada transmission integration. (2012). Krupa, Joel.
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:23:y:2012:i:c:p:99-101.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Residential demand response behavior analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation: The case of Yinchuan in China. (2012). He, Yongxiu ; Xiong, Wei ; Xia, Tian ; Wang, Jianhui.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:47:y:2012:i:1:p:230-236.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Real-Time Pricing in the Nordic Power markets. (2012). Svento, Rauli ; Savolainen, Maria Kopsakangas .
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:34:y:2012:i:4:p:1131-1142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Creating a Smarter U.S. Electricity Grid. (2012). Joskow, Paul.
    In: Journal of Economic Perspectives.
    RePEc:aea:jecper:v:26:y:2012:i:1:p:29-48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-04 04:54:29 || Missing content? Let us know