This document has not been cited yet.

1. Avineri, E. ; Prashker, J.N. Violations of expected utility theory in route-choice stated preferences: certainty effect and inflation of small probabilities. 2004 Transport. Res. Rec.. 1894 222-229
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Clark, M.D. ; Determann, D. ; Petrou, S. ; Moro, D. ; de Bekker-Grob, E.W. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. 2014 Pharmacoeconomics. 32 883-902

3. Cubitt, R.P. ; Starmer, C. ; Sugden, R. Discovered preferences and the experimental evidence of violations of expected utility theory. 2001 J. Econ. Methodol.. 8 385-414

4. Fairchild, A.O. ; Reed, S.D. ; Gonzalez, J.M. Method for calculating the simultaneous maximum acceptable risk threshold (SMART) from discrete-choice experiment benefit-risk studies. 2023 Med. Decis. Making. 43 227-238

5. Gonzalez, J.M. ; Boeri, M. The impact of the risk functional form assumptions on maximum acceptable risk measures. 2021 The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. 14 827-836

6. Gonzalez, J.M. ; Johnson, F.R. ; Levitan, B. ; Noel, R. ; Peay, H. Symposium title: preference evidence for regulatory decisions. 2018 The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. 11 467-473

7. Gonzalez, R. ; Wu, G. On the shape of the probability weighting function. 1999 Cognit. Psychol.. 38 129-166
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Johnson, F.R. ; Zhou, M. Patient preferences in regulatory benefit-risk assessments: a US perspective. 2016 Value Health. 19 741-745
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Kahneman, D. ; Tversky, A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I. 2013 World Scientific. 99-127
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Montano-Campos, J.F. ; Gonzalez, J.M. ; Rickert, T. ; Fairchild, A.O. ; Levitan, B. ; Reed, S.D. Use of patient preferences data regarding multiple risks to inform regulatory decisions. 2023 MDM Policy & Practice. 8 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Prelec, D. The probability weighting function. 1998 Econometrica. 497-527

12. Reed, S.D. ; Yang, J.-C. ; Rickert, T. Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for heart failure devices: a stated-preference study. 2022 Circulation: Heart Fail.. 15 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Starmer, C. Developments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. 2000 J. Econ. Lit.. 38 332-382

14. Tversky, A. ; Kahneman, D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. 1992 J. Risk Uncertain.. 5 297-323

15. Van Houtven, G. ; Johnson, F.R. ; Kilambi, V. ; Hauber, A.B. Eliciting benefit–risk preferences and probability-weighted utility using choice-format conjoint analysis. 2011 Med. Decis. Making. 31 469-480

16. Von Neumann, J. ; Morgenstern, O. Theory of games and economic behavior. 1947 2nd rev.. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Vuong, Q.H. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. 1989 Econometrica: J. Econom. Soc.. 307-333

1. Weighting or aggregating? Investigating information processing in multi‐attribute choices. (2021). Genie, Mesfin G ; Krucien, Nicolas ; Ryan, Mandy.
   In: Health Economics.
   RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:30:y:2021:i:6:p:1291-1305.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Modelling the effect of market forces on the impact of introducing human immunodeficiency virus pre‐exposure prophylaxis among female sex workers. (2021). Mukandavire, Zindoga ; Vickerman, Peter ; Quaife, Matthew ; Terrisprestholt, Fern.
   In: Health Economics.
   RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:30:y:2021:i:3:p:659-679.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Incomplete information and irrelevant attributes in stated‐preference values for health interventions. (2021). Johnson, Reed F ; Gonzalez, Juan M ; Marshall, Deborah A.
   In: Health Economics.
   RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:30:y:2021:i:11:p:2637-2648.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Electronic Money and Consumer Spending Behaviour: Evidence from Ghana. (2021). , Michael ; Jumah, Adusei.
   In: Advances in Management and Applied Economics.
   RePEc:spt:admaec:v:11:y:2021:i:3:f:11_3_6.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Mobilising the Next Generation of Stated-Preference Studies: the Association of Access Device with Choice Behaviour and Data Quality. (2021). Vass, Caroline ; Boeri, Marco.
   In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
   RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00484-x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. German tariffs for the ICECAP-Supportive Care Measure (ICECAP-SCM) for use in economic evaluations at the end of life. (2021). Lobner, Margrit ; Dams, Judith ; Konig, Hans-Helmut ; Huynh, Elisabeth ; Brettschneider, Christian ; Riedel-Heller, Steffi.
   In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
   RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:22:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10198-020-01260-2.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Governance mechanisms for sharing of health data: An approach towards selecting attributes for complex discrete choice experiment studies. (2021). Veldwijk, Jorien ; Johansson, Jennifer Viberg ; Kaye, Jane ; Bentzen, Heidi Beate ; Haraldsdottir, Eik ; Mascalzoni, Deborah ; Coy, Sarah ; Shah, Nisha.
   In: Technology in Society.
   RePEc:eee:teinso:v:66:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21001007.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Quality of care experience in aged care: An Australia-Wide discrete choice experiment to elicit preference weights. (2021). Milte, Rachel ; Khadka, Jyoti ; Ratcliffe, Julie ; Chen, Gang ; Kaambwa, Billingsley.
   In: Social Science & Medicine.
   RePEc:eee:socmed:v:289:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621007723.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: A discrete choice experiment. (2021). Bartling, Tim ; Schrem, Harald ; Krauth, Christian ; Oedingen, Carina ; Muhlbacher, Axel C.
   In: Social Science & Medicine.
   RePEc:eee:socmed:v:287:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621006924.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. To pay or not to pay? Cost information processing in the valuation of publicly funded healthcare. (2021). Genie, Mesfin G ; Krucien, Nicolas ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:276:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621001544.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging. (2021). Oppewal, Harmen ; Lancsar, Emily ; Bliemer, Michiel ; Haghani, Milad ; Rose, John M.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:41:y:2021:i:c:s1755534521000427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research. (2021). Hensher, David ; Bliemer, Michiel ; Haghani, Milad.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:40:y:2021:i:c:s1755534521000361.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Efficacy or delivery? An online Discrete Choice Experiment to explore preferences for COVID-19 vaccines in the UK. (2021). McPhedran, Robert ; Toombs, Ben.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:200:y:2021:i:c:s0165176521000240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Welfare analysis of the ecological impacts of electricity production in Chile using the sparse multinomial logit model. (2021). Azevedo, Ines ; de la Maza, Cristobal ; Davis, Alex.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:184:y:2021:i:c:s0921800921000689.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Smokers are different: The impact of price increases on smoking reduction and downtrading. (2021). Sciala', Antonio ; Liberati, Paolo ; Crespi, Francesco ; Tedeschi, Simone ; Paradiso, Massimo.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:97:y:2021:i:c:p:326-334.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Integrative synthesis of empirical evidence and conceptualisation of external validity. (2021). Oppewal, Harmen ; Bliemer, Michiel ; Haghani, Milad ; Rose, John M ; Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2102.02940.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. iSAY (incentives for South African youth): Stated preferences of young people living with HIV. (2020). Galarraga, Omar ; Hoare, Jackie ; Kuo, Caroline ; Mtukushe, Bulelwa ; Maughan-Brown, Brendan ; Harrison, Abigail.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:265:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620305529.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Measuring public preferences in France for potential consequences stemming from re-allocation of healthcare resources. (2020). Heidenreich, Sebastian ; Krucien, Nicolas ; Pelletier-Fleury, Nathalie ; Gafni, Amiram.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:246:y:2020:i:c:s0277953619307701.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data?. (2020). Swait, Joffre ; Donkers, Bas ; Bliemer, Michiel ; Veldwijk, J ; de Bekker-Grob, E W ; Bliemer, M. C. J., .
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:246:y:2020:i:c:s0277953619307312.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. How information about foreign aid affects public spending decisions: Evidence from a field experiment in Malawi. (2020). Jablonski, Ryan ; Ahlback, Johan ; Seim, Brigitte.
    In: Journal of Development Economics.
    RePEc:eee:deveco:v:146:y:2020:i:c:s0304387820300973.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best–worst discrete choice experiments in health. (2019). Sicsic, Jonathan ; Krucien, Nicolas ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:28:y:2019:i:4:p:572-586.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. U.K. utility weights for the EORTC QLU‐C10D. (2019). Viney, Rosalie ; Brazier, John E ; Rowen, Donna ; Revicki, Dennis ; Of, Treatment ; Street, Deborah J ; Consortium, The Mauca ; Cella, David ; Pickard, Simon A ; Norman, Richard ; Merciecabebber, Rebecca ; King, Madeleine T.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:28:y:2019:i:12:p:1385-1401.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Are Consumers’ Egg Preferences Influenced by Animal-Welfare Conditions and Environmental Impacts?. (2019). Rahmani, Djamal ; Kallas, Zein ; Pappa, Maria ; Gil, Jose Maria.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6218-:d:284253.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Public preferences for health care facilities in rural China: A discrete choice experiment. (2019). Liu, Yun ; Kong, Qingxia ; de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:237:y:2019:i:c:22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Stubbing out hypothetical bias: improving tobacco market predictions by combining stated and revealed preference data. (2019). Hess, Stephane ; Buckell, John.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:65:y:2019:i:c:p:93-102.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Using a stated preference discrete choice experiment to assess societal value from the perspective of decision-makers in Europe. Does it work for rare diseases?. (2019). Martin, Rodriguez B ; Kanavos, P ; Trapero-Bertran, M ; Ramos-Goi, J M ; Lopez-Bastida, J ; Aranda-Reneo, I.
    In: Health Policy.
    RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:123:y:2019:i:2:p:152-158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Heterogeneous Preferences for Micro Health Insurance Attributes in Rural Cambodia: Latent Class Analysis. (2019). Fukui, Seiichi ; Miwa, Kana ; Wakamatsu, Hiroki.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-19-01020.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. RELEASING THE TRAP: A METHOD TO REDUCE INATTENTION BIAS IN SURVEY DATA WITH APPLICATION TO U.S. BEER TAXES. (2019). Malone, Trey ; Lusk, Jayson.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:57:y:2019:i:1:p:584-599.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. The eyes have it: Using eye tracking to inform information processing strategies in multi‐attributes choices. (2018). Krucien, Nicolas ; Ryan, Mandy ; Hermens, Frouke.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:27:y:2018:i:4:p:709-721.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity. (2018). Quaife, Matthew ; Vickerman, Peter ; di Tanna, Gian Luca ; Terris-Prestholt, Fern.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:19:y:2018:i:8:d:10.1007_s10198-018-0954-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Psychometric Properties of the Treatment Perception and Preferences Measure. (2018). .
    In: Clinical Nursing Research.
    RePEc:sae:clnure:v:27:y:2018:i:6:p:743-761.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. SMOKERS ARE DIFFERENT: THE HETEROGENEITY OF SMOKERS’ RESPONSES TO PRICE INCREASES. (2018). Tedeschi, Simone ; Sciala', Antonio ; Liberati, Paolo ; Crespi, Francesco ; Paradiso, Massimo.
    In: Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre'.
    RePEc:rtr:wpaper:0237.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Testing Cessation Messages for Cigarette Package Inserts: Findings from a Best/Worst Discrete Choice Experiment. (2018). Cho, Yoo Jin ; Lambert, Victoria ; Salloum, Ramzi G ; Davis, Rachel E ; Popova, Lucy ; Louviere, Jordan ; Thrasher, James F ; Islam, Farahnaz ; Hammond, David.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:282-:d:130527.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Preference heterogeneity with respect to whole genome sequencing. A discrete choice experiment among parents of children with rare genetic diseases. (2018). Pélissier, Aurore ; Bejean, Sophie ; Peyron, Christine.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:214:y:2018:i:c:p:125-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Individual decisions to vaccinate ones child or oneself: A discrete choice experiment rejecting free-riding motives. (2018). Kessels, Roselinde ; Beutels, Philippe ; Willem, Lander ; Verelst, Frederik.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:207:y:2018:i:c:p:106-116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Valuing health at the end of life: A review of stated preference studies in the social sciences literature. (2018). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Shah, Koonal ; Wailoo, Allan J.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:204:y:2018:i:c:p:39-50.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. End-of-life healthcare expenditure: Testing economic explanations using a discrete choice experiment. (2018). Zweifel, Peter ; Telser, Harry ; Fischer, Barbara.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:60:y:2018:i:c:p:30-38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Stated preferences: a unique database composed of 1657 recent published articles in journals related to agriculture, environment, or health. (2017). Wolff, François-Charles ; Andersson, Henrik ; Dit, Romain Crastes ; Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Beaumais, Olivier ; Hess, Stephane.
    In: Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies.
    RePEc:spr:roafes:v:98:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s41130-017-0053-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Should Flavors be Banned in E-cigarettes? Evidence on Adult Smokers and Recent Quitters from a Discrete Choice Experiment. (2017). Buckell, John ; Sindelar, Jody L ; Marti, Joachim.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:23865.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Implementing shared-decision-making for diabetes care across country settings: What really matters to people?. (2017). Traynor, Vivie ; Petrou, Panagiotis ; Tinelli, Michela ; Samoutis, George ; Olympios, George ; McGuire, Alistair.
    In: Health Policy.
    RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:121:y:2017:i:7:p:786-792.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Insurees’ preferences in hospital choice—A population-based study. (2017). Lichters, Marcel ; Schuldt, Johannes ; Vogt, Bodo ; Robra, Bernt-Peter ; Doktor, Anna.
    In: Health Policy.
    RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:121:y:2017:i:10:p:1040-1046.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. A Framework for Instrument Development of a Choice Experiment: An Application to Type 2 Diabetes. (2016). , John ; Segal, Jodi B ; Janssen, Ellen M.
    In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
    RePEc:spr:patien:v:9:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-016-0170-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. To ‘Vape’ or Smoke? A Discrete Choice Experiment Among U.S. Adult Smokers. (2016). Maclean, Johanna ; Buckell, John ; Sindelar, Jody L ; Marti, Joachim.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22079.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Consumers’ Sense of Farmers’ Markets: Tasting Sustainability or Just Purchasing Food?. (2016). Yu, Xiaohua ; Giampietri, Elisa ; Finco, Adele.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1157-:d:82536.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. The use of specialty training to retain doctors in Malawi: A discrete choice experiment. (2016). Dzowela, Titha ; Lagarde, Mylene ; Mandeville, Kate L ; Hanson, Kara ; Ulaya, Godwin ; Muula, Adamson S.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:169:y:2016:i:c:p:109-118.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. What are GPs preferences for financial and non-financial incentives in cancer screening? Evidence for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. (2016). Sicsic, Jonathan ; Krucien, Nicolas ; Franc, Carine.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:167:y:2016:i:c:p:116-127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice. (2016). Varkevisser, Marco ; Schut, Frederik T ; de Bekker-Grob, Esther W ; Determann, Domino ; Hayen, Arthur P ; de Wit, Ardine G ; Lambooij, Mattijs S.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:165:y:2016:i:c:p:10-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. The DEP-6D, a new preference-based measure to assess health states of dependency. (2016). Sampayo, Antonio ; ABELLAN-PERPIÑAN, JOSE-MARIA ; Gonzalez, X M ; Alvarez, X C ; Abellan-Perpian, J M ; Rodriguez-Miguez, E.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:153:y:2016:i:c:p:210-219.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Asymmetric information and user orientation in general practice: Exploring the agency relationship in a best–worst scaling study. (2016). Pedersen, Line ; Kjar, Trine ; Hess, Stephane.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:50:y:2016:i:c:p:115-130.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Does organizational ownership matter? Objectives of employees in public, nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes. (2015). Van Puyvelde, Stijn ; Caers, Ralf ; Jegers, Marc ; du Bois, Cind.
    In: Applied Economics.
    RePEc:taf:applec:v:47:y:2015:i:24:p:2500-2513.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-03 03:05:47 || Missing content? Let us know