create a website

The impact of solar PV subsidies on investment over time - the case of Sweden. (2024). Lindahl, Johan ; Mignon, Ingrid ; Rydehell, Hanna ; Lantz, Bjorn.
In: Energy Economics.
RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:133:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324002603.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 6

Citations received by this document

Cites: 105

References cited by this document

Cocites: 35

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The Power of Sun—A Comparative Cost–Benefit Analysis of Residential PV Systems in Poland. (2025). Bus, Agnieszka ; Hasny, Micha ; Hewelke, Edyta ; Szelgowska, Anna.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5446-:d:1678081.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Assessing Fire Risks in Photovoltaic Panels: A Literature Review in the Context of Blackout Concerns. (2025). Berezovska, Iryna ; Rataj, Magorzata.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3407-:d:1689790.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Rethinking the forecasting of innovation diffusion: A combined actor- and system approach. (2025). Lantz, Bjrn ; Mignon, Ingrid ; Cardol, Hanna.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:214:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525000897.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Climate change cognition and biodiversity conservation awareness facilitate household clean energy consumption: Evidence from a biodiversity hotspot. (2025). Zhang, Zhiqiu ; Kong, Yang ; He, Weijun ; Zhou, Lingfang.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:212:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125000644.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The impact of rising electricity prices on demand for photovoltaic solar systems. (2025). Falk, Martin Thomas ; Hagsten, Eva.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:147:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325004074.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Profitability Analysis of a Prosumer Photovoltaic Installation in Light of Changing Electricity Billing Regulations in Poland. (2024). Cielak, Krystian Janusz.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:15:p:3618-:d:1441251.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

    References contributed by 1291904_4910104612441850

  1. Agterbosch, S., Vermeulen, W., Glasbergen, P., 2004. Implementation of wind energy in the Netherlands: the importance of the social–institutional setting. Energy Policy 32 (18), 2049–2066.

  2. Andersson, B.A., Jacobsson, S., 2000. Monitoring and assessing technology choice: the case of solar cells. Energy Policy 28 (14), 1037–1049.

  3. Andersson, J., Hellsmark, H., Sand´en, B., 2021. Photovoltaics in Sweden–Success or failure? Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 143, 110894.

  4. Appl. Energy 236, 1249–1268.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Aydın, E., Brounen, D., Ergün, A., 2023. The rebound effect of solar panel adoption: evidence from Dutch households. Energy Econ. 120, 106645.

  6. Barazza, E., Strachan, N., 2020. The impact of heterogeneous market players with bounded-rationality on the electricity sector low-carbon transition. Energy Policy 138, 111274.

  7. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., 2010. Are tradable green certificates a cost-efficient policy driving technical change or a rent-generating machine? Lessons from Sweden 2003–2008. Energy Policy 38 (3), 1255–1271.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bergek, A., Mignon, I., 2017. Motives to adopt renewable electricity technologies: evidence from Sweden. Energy Policy 106, 547–559.

  9. Bergek, A., Mignon, I., Sundberg, G., 2013. Who invests in renewable electricity production? Empirical evidence and suggestions for further research. Energy Policy 56, 568–581.

  10. Best, R., 2017. Switching towards coal or renewable energy? The effects of financial capital on energy transitions. Energy Econ. 63, 75–83.

  11. Best, R., Marrone, M., Linnenluecke, M., 2023. Meta-analysis of the role of equity dimensions in household solar panel adoption. Ecol. Econ. 206, 107754.

  12. Bollinger, B., Gillingham, K., 2012. Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels. Mark. Sci. 31 (6), 900–912.

  13. Briguglio, M., Formosa, G., 2017. When households go solar: determinants of uptake of a photovoltaic scheme and policy insights. Energy Policy 108, 154–162.

  14. Brudermann, T., Reinsberger, K., Orthofer, A., Kislinger, M., Posch, A., 2013. Photovoltaics in agriculture: a case study on decision making of farmers. Energy Policy 61, 96–103.

  15. Bürer, M.J., Wüstenhagen, R., 2009. Which renewable energy policy is a venture capitalist’s best friend? Empirical evidence from a survey of international cleantech investors. Energy Policy 37 (12), 4997–5006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Chadwick, K., Russell-Bennett, R., Biddle, N., 2022. The role of human influences on adoption and rejection of energy technology: a systematised critical review of the literature on household energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 89, 102528.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Ciarreta, A., Espinosa, M.P., Pizarro-Irizar, C., 2017. Optimal regulation of renewable energy: a comparison of feed-in tariffs and tradable green certificates in the Spanish electricity system. Energy Econ. 67, 387–399.

  18. Criscuolo, C., Menon, C., 2015. Environmental policies and risk finance in the green sector: cross-country evidence. Energy Policy 83, 38–56.

  19. D'Agostino, D., Cuniberti, B., Bertoldi, P., 2017. Energy consumption and efficiency technology measures in European non-residential buildings. Energ. Build. 153, 72–86.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. De Groote, O., Verboven, F., 2019. Subsidies and time discounting in new technology adoption: evidence from solar photovoltaic systems. Am. Econ. Rev. 109 (6), 2137–2172.

  21. Dinica, V., 2006. Support systems for the diffusion of renewable energy technologies—an investor perspective. Energy Policy 34 (4), 461–480. http://www.sciencedirect.co m/science/article/pii/S0301421504001880.

  22. Dusonchet, L., Telaretti, E., 2015. Comparative economic analysis of support policies for solar PV in the most representative EU countries. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 42, 986–998.

  23. Finon, D., Perez, Y., 2007. The social efficiency of instruments of promotion of renewable energies: a transaction-cost perspective. Ecol. Econ. 62 (1), 77–92. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.011.

  24. Fisher, R., Maritz, A., Lobo, A., 2014. Evaluating entrepreneurs’ perception of success: development of a measurement scale. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 20 (5), 478–492.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Fleiß, E., Hatzl, S., Seebauer, S., Posch, A., 2017. Money, not morale: the impact of desires and beliefs on private investment in photovoltaic citizen participation initiatives. J. Clean. Prod. 141, 920–927.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Fleten, S.-E., Maribu, K.M., Wangensteen, I., 2007. Optimal investment strategies in decentralized renewable power generation under uncertainty. Energy 32 (5), 803–815.

  27. Fouquet, D., 2013. Policy instruments for renewable energy–from a European perspective. Renew. Energy 49, 15–18.

  28. Frey, E.F., Mojtahedi, S., 2018. The impact of solar subsidies on California’s nonresidential sector. Energy Policy 122, 27–35.

  29. García-Maroto, I., García-Maraver, A., Munoz-Leiva, ˜ F., Zamorano, M., 2015. Consumer knowledge, information sources used and predisposition towards the adoption of wood pellets in domestic heating systems. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 43, 207–215.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Gautier, A., Jacqmin, J., 2020. PV adoption: the role of distribution tariffs under net metering. J. Regul. Econ. 57, 53–73.

  31. Government Offices of Sweden, 2009. Forordning ¨ (2009:689) om statligt stod ¨ till solceller. Retrieved from. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/do kument/svensk-forfattningssamling/forordning-2009689-om-statligt-stod-till_sfs2009-689/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Government Offices of Sweden, 2020. Skattereduktion for ¨ installation av gron ¨ teknik.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Gross, R., Blyth, W., Heptonstall, P., 2010. Risks, revenues and investment in electricity generation: why policy needs to look beyond costs. Energy Econ. 32 (4), 796–804.

  34. Haegermark, M., Kovacs, P., Dalenb¨ ack, J.-O., 2017. Economic feasibility of solar photovoltaic rooftop systems in a complex setting: a Swedish case study. Energy 127, 18–29.

  35. Hansen, A.R., Jacobsen, M.H., Gram-Hanssen, K., 2022. Characterizing the Danish energy prosumer: who buys solar PV systems and why do they buy them? Ecol. Econ. 193, 107333.

  36. Heiskanen, E., Matschoss, K., 2017. Understanding the uneven diffusion of building-scale renewable energy systems: a review of household, local and country level factors in diverse European countries. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 75, 580–591.

  37. Hildenbrand, W., 1983. On the Law of Demand. Econ. J. Econ. Soc. 997–1019.

  38. Hoerl, A.E., Kennard, R.W., 2000. Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 80–86.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. IEA, 2018. National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in Sweden, p. 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. IEA, 2022a. National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in Sweden, p. 2021. https ://iea-pvps.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/National-Survey-Report-of-PV-P ower-Applications-in-Sweden-2021.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. IEA, 2022c. Trends in Photovoltaics Applications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Jacksohn, A., Grosche, ¨ P., Rehdanz, K., Schroder, ¨ C., 2019. Drivers of renewable technology adoption in the household sector. Energy Econ. 81, 216–226.

  43. Janke, T., Steinke, F., 2019. Forecasting the price distribution of continuous intraday electricity trading. Energies 12 (22), 4262.

  44. Jenner, S., Groba, F., Indvik, J., 2013. Assessing the strength and effectiveness of renewable electricity feed-in tariffs in European Union countries. Energy Policy 52, 385–401.

  45. Johnstone, N., Haˇsˇciˇc, I., Popp, D., 2010. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environ. Resour. Econ. 45, 133–155.

  46. Juarez-Colunga, E., Dean, C., 2020. Negative binomial regression. In: Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat08246.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Karneyeva, Y., Wüstenhagen, R., 2017. Solar feed-in tariffs in a post-grid parity world: the role of risk, investor diversity and business models. Energy Policy 106, 445–456.

  48. Kastner, I., Stern, P.C., 2015. Examining the decision-making processes behind household energy investments: a review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 10, 72–89.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Kennedy, P., 2003. A Guide to Econometrics, 5th ed. In. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  50. Kesidou, S.L., Sorrell, S., 2018. Low-carbon innovation in non-domestic buildings: the importance of supply chain integration. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 45, 195–213.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Konjunkturinstitutet, 2023. Barometerindikatorn och andra indikatorer, månad. http ://statistik.konj.se/PxWeb/pxweb/sv/KonjBar/KonjBar__indikatorer/Indikatorm. px/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Kopsakangas-Savolainen, M., Mattinen, M.K., Manninen, K., Nissinen, A., 2017. Hourlybased greenhouse gas emissions of electricity–cases demonstrating possibilities for households and companies to decrease their emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 153, 384–396.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Kumar, P., Gupta, S., Dagar, V., 2024. Sustainable energy development through nonresidential rooftop solar photovoltaic adoption: empirical evidence from India. Sustainable Development 32 (1), 795–814.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Lekaviˇcius, V., Bobinaite, ˙ V., Galinis, A., Paˇzerait ˙ e, ˙ A., 2020. Distributional impacts of investment subsidies for residential energy technologies. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 130, 109961.

  55. Li, J., Huang, J., 2020. The expansion of China’s solar energy: challenges and policy options. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 132, 110002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Lindahl, J., Lingfors, D., Elmqvist, Å., Mignon, I., 2022. Economic analysis of the early market of centralized photovoltaic parks in Sweden. Renew. Energy 185, 1192–1208.

  57. Loock, M., 2012. Going beyond best technology and lowest price: on renewable energy investors’ preference for service-driven business models. Energy Policy 40, 21–27.

  58. Lüthi, S., Wüstenhagen, R., 2012. The price of policy risk—empirical insights from choice experiments with European photovoltaic project developers. Energy Econ. 34 (4), 1001–1011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Masini, A., Menichetti, E., 2012. Investment decisions in the renewable energy sector: an analysis of non-financial drivers. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80 (3), 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Menanteau, P., Finon, D., Lamy, M.-L., 2003. Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Policy 31 (8), 799–812.

  61. Mignon, I., 2016. Inducing large-scale diffusion of innovation - and integrated actor- and system-level approach (Publication Number 1777) Linkoping ¨ University. Linkoping. ¨ http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A958063&dswid=-7721.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Mignon, I., Bergek, A., 2016a. Investments in renewable electricity production: the importance of policy revisited. Renew. Energy 88, 307–316.

  63. Mignon, I., Bergek, A., 2016b. System-and actor-level challenges for diffusion of renewable electricity technologies: an international comparison. J. Clean. Prod. 128, 105–115.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Mitchell, C., Bauknecht, D., Connor, P.M., 2006. Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany. Energy Policy 34 (3), 297–305.

  65. Mundaca, L., Samahita, M., 2020. What drives home solar PV uptake? Subsidies, peer effects and visibility in Sweden. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 60, 101319.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Niesten, E., Jolink, A., Chappin, M., 2018. Investments in the Dutch onshore wind energy industry: a review of investor profiles and the impact of renewable energy subsidies.

  67. Ozdemir, ¨ O., ¨ Hobbs, B.F., van Hout, M., Koutstaal, P.R., 2020. Capacity vs energy subsidies for promoting renewable investment: benefits and costs for the EU power market. Energy Policy 137, 111166.

  68. Palm, A., 2015. An emerging innovation system for deployment of building-sited solar photovoltaics in Sweden. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 15, 140–157.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Palm, A., 2017. Peer effects in residential solar photovoltaics adoption—a mixed methods study of Swedish users. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 26, 1–10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Palm, A., Lantz, B., 2020. Information dissemination and residential solar PV adoption rates: the effect of an information campaign in Sweden. Energy Policy 142, 111540.

  71. Palm, J., 2018. Household installation of solar panels–motives and barriers in a 10-year perspective. Energy Policy 113, 1–8.

  72. Palm, J., Tengvard, M., 2011. Motives for and barriers to household adoption of smallscale production of electricity: examples from Sweden. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 7 (1), 6–15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Pitelis, A., Vasilakos, N., Chalvatzis, K., 2020. Fostering innovation in renewable energy technologies: choice of policy instruments and effectiveness. Renew. Energy 151, 1163–1172.

  74. Poier, S., 2021. Towards a psychology of solar energy: analyzing the effects of the Big Five personality traits on household solar energy adoption in Germany. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 77, 102087.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Polzin, F., 2017. Mobilizing private finance for low-carbon innovation–a systematic review of barriers and solutions. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 77, 525–535.

  76. Polzin, F., Egli, F., Steffen, B., Schmidt, T.S., 2019. How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy?—a systematic review with an investor perspective.

  77. Polzin, F., Migendt, M., Taube, ¨ F.A., von Flotow, P., 2015. Public policy influence on renewable energy investments—a panel data study across OECD countries. Energy Policy 80, 98–111.

  78. Poshnath, A., Rismanchi, B., Rajabifard, A., 2023. Adoption of renewable energy systems in common properties of multi-owned buildings: introduction of ‘energy entitlement’. Energy Policy 174, 113465.

  79. Provaty, S.S., Hasan, M.M., Luo, L., 2024. Organization capital and GHG emissions. Energy Econ. 107372.

  80. PVInsight, 2022. Polysilicon Solar Price – PV Insights. http://pvinsights.com.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Reindl, K., Palm, J., 2021. Installing PV: barriers and enablers experienced by nonresidential property owners. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 141, 110829.

  82. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 81, 2519–2525.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Resch, G., Ragwitz, M., Held, A., Faber, T., Haas, R., 2007. Feed-in tariffs and quotas for renewable energy in Europe. CESifo DICE Rep. 5 (4), 26–32.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Ringel, M., 2006. Fostering the use of renewable energies in the European Union: the race between feed-in tariffs and green certificates. Renew. Energy 31 (1), 1–17.

  85. Rogers., 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. The Free Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Sadorsky, P., 2021. Wind energy for sustainable development: driving factors and future outlook. J. Clean. Prod. 289, 125779.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Sardianou, E., 2007. Estimating energy conservation patterns of Greek households. Energy Policy 35 (7), 3778–3791.

  88. Sardianou, E., Genoudi, P., 2013. Which factors affect the willingness of consumers to adopt renewable energies? Renew. Energy 57, 1–4.

  89. Selvakkumaran, S., Ahlgren, E.O., 2019. Determining the factors of household energy transitions: a multi-domain study. Technol. Soc. 57, 54–75.

  90. Sheha, M., Mohammadi, K., Powell, K., 2021. Techno-economic analysis of the impact of dynamic electricity prices on solar penetration in a smart grid environment with distributed energy storage. Appl. Energy 282, 116168.

  91. Skordoulis, M., Ntanos, S., Arabatzis, G., 2020. Socioeconomic evaluation of green energy investments: analyzing citizens’ willingness to invest in photovoltaics in Greece. International Journal of Energy Sector Management 14 (5), 871–890.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Solangi, K., Islam, M., Saidur, R., Rahim, N., Fayaz, H., 2011. A review on global solar energy policy. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 15 (4), 2149–2163.

  93. Sommerfeldt, N., Lemoine, I., Madani, H., 2022. Hide and seek: the supply and demand of information for household solar photovoltaic investment. Energy Policy 161, 112726.

  94. Spiller, E., Esparza, R., Mohlin, K., Tapia-Ahumada, K., Ünel, B., 2023. The role of electricity tariff design in distributed energy resource deployment. Energy Econ. 106500.

  95. Statistics Sweden, 2023. Inflation in Sweden 1830–2022: Annual average change in percentage of consumer prices. https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statisticsby-subject-area/prices-and-consumption/consumer-price-index/consumer-price-i ndex-cpi/pong/tables-and-graphs/consumer-price-index-cpi/inflation-in-sweden/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  96. The Swedish Consumer Energy Markets Bureau, 2023. Månadspriser på elborsen ¨ mellan 1996 och 2022. The Swedish Consumer Energy Markets Bureau. https://www.energi marknadsbyran.se/el/dina-avtal-och-kostnader/elpriser-statistik/manadspriser-paelborsen/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  97. Tolliver, C., Keeley, A.R., Managi, S., 2020. Policy targets behind green bonds for renewable energy: do climate commitments matter? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 157, 120051.

  98. United Nations, 2015. Paris agreement. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/paris-a greement.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  99. Ver Hoef, J.M., Boveng, P.L., 2007. Quasi-Poisson vs. negative binomial regression: how should we model overdispersed count data? Ecology 88 (11), 2766–2772.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  100. Warneryd, M., Karltorp, K., 2020. The role of values for niche expansion: the case of solar photovoltaics on large buildings in Sweden. Energy Sustain. Soc. 10 (1), 1–13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  101. Wüstenhagen, R., Menichetti, E., 2012. Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: conceptual framework and opportunities for further research. Energy Policy 40, 1–10.

  102. Yang, Z., Zhang, M., Liu, L., Zhou, D., 2022. Can renewable energy investment reduce carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence from scale and structure. Energy Econ. 112, 106181.

  103. Yu, X., Ge, S., Zhou, D., Wang, Q., Chang, C.-T., Sang, X., 2022. Whether feed-in tariff can be effectively replaced or not? An integrated analysis of renewable portfolio standards and green certificate trading. Energy 245, 123241.

  104. Zainali, S., Lindahl, J., Lind´en, J., Stridh, B., 2023. LCOE distribution of PV for singlefamily dwellings in Sweden. Energy Rep. 10, 1951–1967.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  105. Zhang, H., Zheng, Y., Ozturk, U.A., Li, S., 2016. The impact of subsidies on overcapacity: a comparison of wind and solar energy companies in China. Energy 94, 821–827.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The impact of solar PV subsidies on investment over time - the case of Sweden. (2024). Lindahl, Johan ; Mignon, Ingrid ; Rydehell, Hanna ; Lantz, Bjorn.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:133:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324002603.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. ‘Luctor et emergo’, how a community energy initiative survived the changing policy and technology landscape of the Dutch energy system?. (2023). van der Windt, Henny ; van der Waal, Esther ; Maqbool, Amtul Samie.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:177:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523001131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Participatory Impetus for and Forms of Citizens’ Co-Owned Power Plants: Cases from Higashi-Ohmi, Japan. (2021). Glaser, Rudiger ; Huang, Hui-Tzu.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:1843-:d:524550.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Barriers and Drivers of Renewable Energy Penetration in Rural Areas. (2021). Baležentis, Tomas ; Baleentis, Tomas ; Morknas, Mangirdas ; Streimikis, Justas ; Streimikiene, Dalia ; Volkov, Artiom.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:20:p:6452-:d:652348.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The co-evolution of innovation systems and context: Offshore wind in Norway and the Netherlands. (2021). Hekkert, Marko P ; Hanson, Jens ; Normann, Hkon E ; van der Loos, Adriaan.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:138:y:2021:i:c:s1364032120307991.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The challenging paradigm of interrelated energy systems towards a more sustainable future. (2018). Rodrigues, E ; Garcia, R ; Castanheira, E ; Miguel, P ; Du, C ; Soares, N ; Caldeira, C ; Figueiredo, N C ; Carvalho, A L ; Ahovi, N ; Martins, A G ; Ribeiro, L A ; Ferreira, J P ; Bastos, J ; Oliveira, G ; Pereira, G I.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:95:y:2018:i:c:p:171-193.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Investments in the Dutch onshore wind energy industry: A review of investor profiles and the impact of renewable energy subsidies. (2018). Niesten, Eva ; Jolink, Albert ; Chappin, Maryse.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:81:y:2018:i:p2:p:2519-2525.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Renewable Energy Cooperatives as an instrument towards the energy transition in Spain. (2018). Teres-Zubiaga, Jon ; Capellan-Perez, Iigo ; Campos-Celador, Alvaro.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:123:y:2018:i:c:p:215-229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Firm Type, Feed-in Tariff, and Wind Energy Investment in Germany: An Investigation of Decision Making Factors of Energy Producers Regarding Investing in Wind Energy Capacity. (2017). Scholtens, Bert ; Werner, Lone.
    In: Journal of Industrial Ecology.
    RePEc:bla:inecol:v:21:y:2017:i:2:p:402-411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Varieties of clean energy transitions in Europe Political-economic foundations of onshore and offshore wind development. (2016). Etkovi, Stefan ; Schreurs, Miranda ; Buzogany, Aron.
    In: WIDER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp2016-018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Varieties of clean energy transitions in Europe: Political-economic foundations of onshore and offshore wind development. (2016). Etkovi, Stefan ; Schreurs, Miranda ; Buzogany, Aron.
    In: WIDER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp-2016-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The impact of systemic factors on the deployment of cooperative projects within renewable electricity production – An international comparison. (2016). Mignon, Ingrid ; Rudinger, Andreas .
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:65:y:2016:i:c:p:478-488.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Investments in renewable electricity production: The importance of policy revisited. (2016). Mignon, Ingrid ; Bergek, Anna.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:88:y:2016:i:c:p:307-316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The role of market-oriented institutions in the deployment of renewable energies: Evidences from Europe. (2015). Jacqmin, Julien.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:lam:wpaper:15-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The determinants of support levels for wind energy in the European Union. An econometric study. (2014). Peñasco, Cristina ; Rio, Pablo ; Tarancon, Miguel ; Peasco, Cristina.
    In: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.
    RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:19:y:2014:i:4:p:391-410.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Which Investors Drive the Development of Wind Energy?. (2014). Niesten, Eva ; Hekkert, Marko ; Darmani, Anna .
    In: INDEK Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:kthind:2014_008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Evaluating the impact of the administrative procedure and the landscape policy on grid connected PV systems (GCPVS) on-floor in Spain in the period 2004–2008: To which extent a limiting factor?. (2013). Matas, Jose ; de la Hoz, Jordi ; Miret, Jaume ; Martin, Helena ; Martins, Blanca .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:63:y:2013:i:c:p:147-167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Who invests in renewable electricity production? Empirical evidence and suggestions for further research. (2013). Mignon, Ingrid ; Sundberg, Gunnel ; Bergek, Anna.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:56:y:2013:i:c:p:568-581.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Ideas, Institutions, and Interests: Explaining Policy Divergence in Fostering €˜System Innovations€™ towards Sustainability. (2011). .
    In: Environment and Planning C.
    RePEc:sae:envirc:v:29:y:2011:i:6:p:1116-1134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Analyzing policy support instruments and regulatory risk factors for wind energy deployment--A developers perspective. (2011). Prassler, Thomas ; Luthi, Sonja.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:39:y:2011:i:9:p:4876-4892.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Overcoming latecomer disadvantage through learning processes: Taiwan’s venture into wind power development. (2010). Scott, Steffanie ; MacLaughlin, David .
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:12:y:2010:i:3:p:389-406.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Are Smaller Turbines the Way Forward for Wind Energy in Herefordshire?. (2010). Linnell, Peter .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:58879.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Are Smaller Turbines the Way Forward for Wind Energy in Herefordshire?. (2010). Linnell, Peter .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:58386.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Are Smaller Turbines the Way Forward for Wind Energy in Herefordshire?. (2010). Linnell, Peter .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:58227.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. (2010). Lenox, Michael J. ; Hall, Jeremy K. ; Daneke, Gregory A..
    In: Journal of Business Venturing.
    RePEc:eee:jbvent:v:25:y:2010:i:5:p:439-448.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Levelling the playing field? The influence of national wind power planning instruments on conflicts of interests in a Swedish county. (2010). Bergek, Anna.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:5:p:2357-2369.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Assessment of current Dutch energy transition policy instruments for the existing housing stock. (2010). Tambach, Milly ; Itard, Laure ; Hasselaar, Evert .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:2:p:981-996.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The relative importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power projects. (2009). Vermeulen, Walter J. V., ; Agterbosch, Susanne ; Meertens, Ree M..
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:13:y:2009:i:2:p:393-405.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Factors influencing the likelihood of regulatory changes in renewable electricity policies. (2008). Agnolucci, Paolo.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:12:y:2008:i:1:p:141-161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands. (2008). Kern, Florian ; Smith, Adrian.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:36:y:2008:i:11:p:4093-4103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Social barriers in wind power implementation in The Netherlands: Perceptions of wind power entrepreneurs and local civil servants of institutional and social conditions in realizing wind power projects. (2007). Vermeulen, Walter J. V., ; Agterbosch, Susanne ; Glasbergen, Pieter.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:11:y:2007:i:6:p:1025-1055.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. (2007). Breukers, Sylvia ; Wolsink, Maarten.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:35:y:2007:i:5:p:2737-2750.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Potential of hydrogen from oil palm biomass as a source of renewable energy worldwide. (2007). Kelly-Yong, Tau Len ; Bhatia, Subhash ; Lee, Keat Teong ; Mohamed, Abdul Rahman.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:35:y:2007:i:11:p:5692-5701.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Impact of Strategies to Increase Res in Europe on Employment and Competitiveness. (2006). Walz, Rainer.
    In: Energy & Environment.
    RePEc:sae:engenv:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:951-975.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. The outlook for renewable energy in Navarre: An economic profile. (2006). Garcia, Justo ; Pintor, Jesus M. ; Faulin, Javier ; Lera, Fernando.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:34:y:2006:i:15:p:2201-2216.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-04 13:57:08 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.