1. The Cost of Using Gas as a Transition Fuel in the Transition to Low-Carbon Energy: The Case Study of Poland and Selected European Countries. (2023). Kinelski, Grzegorz ; Czarnecka, Marzena ; Bronicki, Jakub ; Kamiski, Jacek ; Zych, Grzegorz.
   In: Energies.
   RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:994-:d:1037300.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Discursive politics and policy (im)mobility: Metro-TOD policies in India. (2022). Mittal, Harsh ; Shah, Arpit.
   In: Environment and Planning C.
   RePEc:sae:envirc:v:40:y:2022:i:2:p:463-480.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. ‘Were going all out for shale:’ explaining shale gas energy policy failure in the United Kingdom. (2022). Williams, Laurence ; Evensen, Darrick ; Short, Damien ; Sovacool, Benjamin K ; Szolucha, Anna ; Martin, Abigail ; Ryder, Stacia ; Stretesky, Paul ; Devine-Wright, Patrick ; King, Owen ; Bradshaw, Michael.
   In: Energy Policy.
   RePEc:eee:enepol:v:168:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522003573.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Fracking and Asset Prices: The Role of Health Indicators for House Prices Across Oklahoma’s Counties. (2021). Ghosh Dastidar, Sayantan ; Apergis, Nicholas ; Mustafa, Ghulam.
   In: Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement.
   RePEc:spr:soinre:v:154:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-020-02544-z.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Quantitative Evaluation of China’s Pork Industry Policy: A PMC Index Model Approach. (2021). Li, Youzhu ; He, Rui ; Liu, Jinsi ; Xiong, Jason.
   In: Agriculture.
   RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:86-:d:483588.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Adding (bio)fuel to the fire: discourses on palm oil sustainability in the context of European policy development. (2020). Hinkes, Cordula.
   In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
   RePEc:spr:endesu:v:22:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-019-00541-y.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Credible Sources of Information Regarding Induced Seismicity. (2020). Tracy, Andrew ; Javernick-Will, Amy.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2308-:d:332984.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Policy Implications for the Clean Energy Transition: The Case of the Boston Area. (2020). Morone, Piergiuseppe ; Tani, Almona.
   In: Energies.
   RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:10:p:2615-:d:360982.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Storylines of (de)centralisation: Exploring infrastructure dimensions in the German electricity system. (2020). Funcke, S ; Ruppert-Winkel, C.
   In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
   RePEc:eee:rensus:v:121:y:2020:i:c:s1364032119308585.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Sustaining wealth: Simulating a sovereign wealth fund for the UKs oil and gas resources, past and future. (2020). Atkinson, Giles ; Hamilton, Kirk.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:139:y:2020:i:c:s0301421520300331.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Epistemological dominance and ignorance of the comparative advantages of Chinas shale gas: Evidence from international scientific journals. (2020). Zhou, Zhongbing ; Qin, Quande.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:138:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519307918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. The discourses of power – governmental approaches to business models in the renewable energy transition. (2019). Bryant, Scott T ; Straker, Karla ; Wrigley, Cara.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:130:y:2019:i:c:p:41-59.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. A critical review of discursive approaches in energy transitions. (2019). Isoaho, Karoliina ; Karhunmaa, Kamilla.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:128:y:2019:i:c:p:930-942.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Abandoning the concept of renewable energy. (2019). Korhonen, Janne M ; Harjanne, Atte.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:127:y:2019:i:c:p:330-340.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Fracking and metaphor: Analysing newspaper discourse in the USA, Australia and the United Kingdom. (2019). Barkemeyer, Ralf ; Cotton, Matthew ; Napolitano, Giulio ; Renzi, Barbara Gabriella.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:166:y:2019:i:c:8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Can the US shale revolution be duplicated in continental Europe? An economic analysis of European shale gas resources. (2018). Saussay, Aurélien.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/3vsrea3gla9r5oaa2cle5jrqfh.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. An Investigation of the Underlying Evolution of Shale Gas Research’s Domain Based on the Co-Word Network. (2018). Zhang, YU ; Liu, Yuxi ; Xiao, Siqi ; Chai, Li He .
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:164-:d:126802.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. The economic, social and environmental impact of shale gas exploitation in Romania: A cost-benefit analysis. (2018). Grecu, Eugenia ; Albulescu, Claudiu ; Aceleanu, Mirela Ionela.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:93:y:2018:i:c:p:691-700.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. UK public beliefs about fracking and effects of knowledge on beliefs and support: A problem for shale gas policy. (2018). Howell, Rachel A.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:113:y:2018:i:c:p:721-730.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Can the US shale revolution be duplicated in continental Europe? An economic analysis of European shale gas resources. (2018). Saussay, Aurélien.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:295-306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Can the US shale revolution be duplicated in continental Europe?: An economic analysis of European shale gas resources. (2017). Saussay, Aurélien.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2b9jeu7kmm94kq22avt9ejbu5k.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Exploring the intersections between local knowledge and environmental regulation: A study of shale gas extraction in Texas and Lancashire. (2017). .
    In: Environment and Planning C.
    RePEc:sae:envirc:v:35:y:2017:i:3:p:417-433.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Unpacking the intensity of policy conflict: a study of Colorado’s oil and gas subsystem. (2017). Heikkila, Tanya ; Weible, Christopher M.
    In: Policy Sciences.
    RePEc:kap:policy:v:50:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11077-017-9285-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Social licence, corporate social responsibility and coal seam gas: framing the new political dynamics of contestation. (2017). Curran, Giorel.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:427-435.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Energy Technology, Politics, and Interpretative Frames: Shale Gas Fracking in Eastern Europe. (2016). Sovacool, Benjamin K ; Goldthau, Andreas.
    In: Global Environmental Politics.
    RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:16:y:2016:i:4:p:50-69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. How did the US economy react to shale gas production revolution? An advanced time series approach. (2016). koçak, emrah ; Bulut, Umit ; Bilgili, Faik ; Sualp, Nedim M ; Koak, Emrah.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:116:y:2016:i:p1:p:963-977.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Exploring support for shale gas extraction in the United Kingdom. (2016). Knight, William ; Ohara, Sarah ; Humphrey, Mathew ; Andersson-Hudson, Jessica.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:98:y:2016:i:c:p:582-589.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. The impact of the North American shale gas revolution on regional natural gas markets: Evidence from the regime-switching model. (2016). Ji, Qiang ; Fan, Ying ; Geng, Jiang-Bo.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:96:y:2016:i:c:p:167-178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Stakeholder perspectives on shale gas fracking: a Q-method study of environmental discourses. (2015). .
    In: Environment and Planning A.
    RePEc:sae:envira:v:47:y:2015:i:9:p:1944-1962.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Agyeman, J. ; Evans, B. ‘Just sustainability’: the emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain?. 2004 Geogr. J.. 170 155-164
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Anderson, B.J. ; Theodori, G.L. Local leaders׳ perceptions of energy development in the Barnett shale. 2009 South. Rural Sociol.. 24 113-129
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Andrews, I.J. The Carboniferous Bowland Shale Gas Study: Geology and Resource Estimation. 2013 British Geological Survey for the Department of Energy and Climate Change: London
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Arthur, J.D., Bohm, B., Coughlin, B.J., Layne, M., 2009. Evaluating implications of hydraulic fracturing in shale gas reservoirs. In: Proceedings of the SPE Americas E&P environmental and safety conference, San Antonio, Texas.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Asche, F. ; Oglend, A. ; Osmundsen, P. Gas versus oil prices the impact of shale gas. 2012 Energy Policy. 47 117-124

6. Bartlett, R.V. ; Kurian, P.A. The theory of environmental impact assessment: implicit models of policy making. 1999 Policy Politics. 27 415-433
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Beck, U. Risk Society: Toward a New Modernity. 1996 Sage: London
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Bern, M.R. ; Winkel, G. Nuclear reaction to climate change? Comparing discourses on nuclear energy in France and Germany. 2013 En : Keller, R. ; Truschkat, I. Methodologie und Praxis der Wissenssoziologischen Diskursanalyse. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Blowers, A. ; Leroy, P. Power, politics and environmental inequality: a theoretical and empirical analysis of the process of peripheralisation. 1994 Environ. Politics. 3 197-228
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Booth, R. Anti-fracking protesters halt Sussex shale gas operation. 2013 The Guardian: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Boudet, H. ; Clarke, C. ; Bugden, D. ; Maibach, E. ; Roser-Renouf, C. ; Leiserowitz, A. “Fracking” controversy and communication: using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. 2014 Energy Policy. 65 57-67

12. Braun, V. ; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. 2006 Qual. Res. Psychol.. 3 77-101
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Bridge, G. ; Bouzarovski, S. ; Bradshaw, M. ; Eyre, N. Geographies of energy transition: space, place and the low-carbon economy. 2013 Energy Policy. 53 331-340

14. Broderick, J. ; Anderson, K. ; Wood, R. ; Gilbert, P. ; Sharmina, M. ; Footitt, A. ; Glynn, S. ; Nicholls, F. Shale Gas: An Updated Assessment of Environmental and Climate Change Impacts. 2011 The Co-Operative and the Tyndall Centre Manchester: Manchester
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Broto, V.C. ; Burningham, K. ; Carter, C. ; Elghali, L. Stigma and Attachment: Performance of Identity in an Environmentally Degraded Place. 2010 Society Nat. Resour.. 23 952-968
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Bulkeley, H. Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. 2000 Environ. Planning C. 18 727-748
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Burningham, K. Using the language of NIMBY: a topic for research, not an activity for researchers. 2000 Local Environ.. 5 55-67
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Calvano, L. Multinatinal corporations and local communities: a critical analysis of conflict. 2008 J. Bus. Eth.. 82 793-805

19. Cameron, D. We cannot afford to miss out on shale gas. 2013 The Telegraph: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Chen, J. ; Al-Wadei, M.H. ; Kennedy, R.C.M. ; Terry, P.D. Hydraulic fracturing: paving the way for a sustainable future?. 2014 J. Environ. Pub. Health. 10-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Christoff, P. Ecological modernisation, ecological modernities. 1996 Environ. Politics. 5 476-500
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Colborn, T. ; Kwiatkowski, C. ; Schultz, K. ; Bachran, M. Natural gas operations from a public health perspective. 2011 Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.. 17 1039-1056
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Cotton, M. NIMBY or not? Integrating social factors into shale gas community engagements. 2013 Nat. Gas Electr.. 29 8-12
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Cotton, M. ; Devine-Wright, P. Putting pylons into place: a UK case study of public beliefs about the impacts of high voltage overhead transmission lines. 2013 J. Environ. Plan. Manage.. 56 1225-1245

25. DECC, The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan: National Strategy for Climate and Energy. 2009 Department of Energy and Climate Change: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. DECC, 2013. Estimates of shale gas resource in North of England published, alongside a package of community benefits. DECC, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. Devine-Wright, P. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. 2005 Wind Energy. 8 125-139
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Devine-Wright, P. ; Howes, Y. Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: a wind energy case study. 2010 J. Environ. Psychol.. 30 271-280
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Douglas, M. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. 1966 Routledge: Abingdon
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Druckman, J.N. The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence. 2001 Political Behav.. 23 225-256
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Dryzek, J.S. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. 1997 Oxford University Press: Oxford
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Eisner, L., Janska, E., Matousek, P., 2011. Seismic Analysis of the Events in the Vicinity of the Preese Hall Well. Seismic Report for Cuadrilla Resources, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Environment Agency, Regulating Unconventional Gas. 2014 Environment Agency: Briston
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Environment Agency, Sustainable Business Report. 2013 Environment Agency: Bristol
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Finewood, M.H. ; Stroup, L.J. Fracking and the Neoliberalization of the Hydro-Social Cycle in Pennsylvania׳s Marcellus Shale. 2012 J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ.. 147 72-79
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Fischer, F. Evaluating Public Policy. 1995 Nelson-Hall: Chicago
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Foxon, T.J. Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future. 2013 Energy Policy. 52 10-24

38. Gény, F. Can Unconventional Gas be a Game Changer in European Gas Markets?. 2011 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies: Oxford
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Glaser, B. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. 1992 Sociology Press: Mill Valley, CA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Gosden, E. Shale gas boost as plans for EU laws are scrapped. 2014 The Telegraph: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Green, C.A. ; Styles, P. ; Baptie, B. Preese Hall Shale Gas Fracturing: Review and Recommendations for Induced Seismic Mitigation. 2012 Department of Energy and Climate Change: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. Gregory, R. ; Flynn, J. ; Slovic, P. Technological stigma. 1995 Am. Sci.. 83 220-223
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

43. Gross, C. Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: the application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. 2007 Energy Policy. 35 2727-2736

44. Gunningham, N. ; Kagan, R.A. ; Thornton, D. Social licence and environmental protection: why businesses go beyond compliance. 2004 Law Soc. Inq.. 29 307-341
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. Hajer, M. Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Britain. 1993 En : Fischer, F. ; Forest, J. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duke University Press: Durham
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Hajer, M. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. 1995 Clarendon Press: Oxford
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
47. Hajer, M. ; Versteeg, W. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. 2005 J. Environ Policy Plan.. 7 175-184
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Hartley, N. ; Wood, C.M. Public participation in environmental impact assessment—implementing the Aarhus Convention. 2005 Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.. 25 319-340
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. Hindmarsh, R. ; Matthews, C. Deliberative speak at the turbine face: community engagement, wind farms, and renewable energy transitions, in Australia. 2008 J. Environ. Policy Plan.. 10 217-232
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. HM Treasury, 2013a. Harnessing the potential of the UK׳s natural resources: a fiscal regime for shale gas. In: Treasury, H. (Ed.), London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
51. HM Treasury, 2013b. Spending round 2013. In: Treasury, H. (Ed.), London, p. 68.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
52. Howard-Grenville, J. ; Nash, J. ; Coglianese, C. Constructing the licence to operate: internal factors and their influence on corporate environmental decisions. 2008 Law Policy. 30 73-107
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Howarth, R. ; Santoro, R. ; Ingraffea, A. Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. 2011 Climatic Change. 106 679-690
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

54. Howarth, R.W. ; Ingraffea, A. ; Engelder, T. Natural gas: should fracking stop?. 2011 Nature. 477 271-275

55. Hu, D. ; Xu, S. Opportunity, challenges and policy choices for China on the development of shale gas. 2013 Energy Policy. 60 21-26

56. Hunold, C. ; Leitner, S. ‘Hasta la vista, baby!’ The Solar Grand Plan, environmentalism, and social constructions of the Mojave Desert. 2011 Environ. Politics. 20 687-704
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
57. International Energy Agency, Medium-Term Coal Market Report 2013: Market Trends and Projections to 2018. 2013 International Energy Agency: Paris
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
58. Irwin, A. ; Wynne, B. Misunderstanding Science: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. 1996 Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
59. Jaspal, R. ; Nerlich, B. Fracking in the UK media: Threat Dynamics in an Unfolding Debate. 2014 Pub. Underst. Sci.. 23 348-363
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
60. Jaspal, R., Turner, A., Nerlich, B., 2014. Fracking on YouTube: exploring risks, benefits and human values. Environ. Values, accepted for publication, http://www.erica.demon.co.uk/EV/papers/Jaspal.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

61. Jenner, S. ; Lamadrid, A.J. Shale gas vs. coal: policy implications from environmental impact comparisons of shale gas, conventional gas, and coal on air, water, and land in the United States. 2013 Energy Policy. 53 442-453

62. Jessup, B. Plural and hybrid environmental values: a discourse analysis of the wind energy conflict in Australia and the United Kingdom. 2010 Environ. Politics. 19 21-44
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

63. Kahan, D.M. ; Peters, E. ; Wittlin, M. ; Slovic, P. ; Ouellette, L.L. ; Braman, D. ; Mandel, G. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. 2012 Nat. Clim. Change. 2 732-735

64. Kargbo, D.M. ; Wilhelm, R.G. ; Campbell, D.J. Natural gas plays in the Marcellus Shale: challenges and potential opportunities. 2010 Environ. Sci. Technol.. 44 5679-5684
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
65. Kaswan, A. Distributive justice and the environment. 2002 NCL Rev.. 81 1031-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

66. Kleinrichert, D. Ethics, power and communities: corporate social responsibility revisited. 2008 J. Bus. Eth.. 78 475-485

67. Kotsakis, A. The regulation of the technical, environmental and health aspects of current exploratory shale gas extraction in the United Kingdom: initial lessons for the future of European Union energy policy. 2012 Rev. Eur. Community Int. Environ. Law. 21 282-290
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
68. Lakoff, G. ; Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. 1980 Chicago University Press: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
69. Larson, B. Metaphors for Environmental Sustainability: Redefining Our Relationship with Nature. 2011 Yale University Press: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
70. Lawrence, R.L. ; Daniels, S.E. ; Stankey, G.H. Procedural justice and public involvement in natural resource decision making. 1997 Soc. Nat. Resour.. 10 577-589
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

71. Lidskog, R. Scientised citizens and democratised science. Re‐assessing the expert–lay divide. 2008 J. Risk Res.. 11 69-86

72. Litfin, K. Framing science: precautionary discourse and the ozone treaties. 1995 Millennium: J. Int. Stud.. 24 251-277
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
73. Litfin, K.T. Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. 1994 Columbia University Press: New York
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

74. Loiter, J.M. ; Norberg-Bohm, V. Technology policy and renewable energy: public roles in the development of new energy technologies. 1999 Energy Policy. 27 85-97

75. Macalister, T. ; Harvey, F. Osborne unveils ‘most generous tax breaks in world’ for fracking: environmental groups furious at ‘sweet-heart deal’ as chancellor sets 30% rate for shale gas producers. 2013 The Guardian: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
76. Majone, G. Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. 1989 Yale University Press: New Haven, CT
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
77. Malin, S. There׳s no real choice but to sign: neoliberalization and normalization of hydraulic fracturing on Pennsylvania farmland. 2013 J. Environ. Stud. Sci.. 1-11
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
78. Mander, S. The role of discourse coalitions in planning for renewable energy: a case study of wind-energy deployment. 2008 Environ. Plan. C: Gov. Policy. 26 583-600
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
79. Miles, M. ; Huberman, M. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. 1984 Sage: Beverly Hills, CA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
80. Núñez, R. Reclaiming Cognition: The Primacy of Action, Intention and Emotion. 2000 Imprint Academic: Thorverton
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
81. Nash, L. Purity and danger: historical reflections on the regulation of environmental pollutants. 2008 Environ. Hist.. 13 651-658
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
82. Neate, P. Fracking boss faces growing tremors of resistance from public, press and Tories. 2013 The Guardian: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
83. No Dash For Gas, No Dash For Gas response to telegraph piece today. 2013 No Dash For Gas. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
84. O׳Hara, S. ; Humphrey, M. ; Jaspal, R. ; Nerlich, B. ; Knight, W. Public Perception of Shale Gas Extraction in the UK: The Impact of the Balcombe Protests in July–August 2013. 2013 Nottingham University: Nottingham
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
85. Pasqualetti, M.J. ; Gipe, P. ; Righter, R.W. A landscape of power. 2002 En : Pasqualetti, M.J. ; Gipe, P. ; Righter, R.W. Wind Power in View: Energy Landscapes in a Crowded World. Academic Press: San Diego
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
86. Pearson, I. ; Zeniewski, P. ; Gracceva, F. ; Zastera, P. ; McGlade, C. ; Sorrell, S. ; Speirs, J. ; Thonhauser, G. Unconventional Gas: Potential Energy Market Impacts in the European Union. 2012 European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport: Petten
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

87. Poortinga, W. ; Pidgeon, N.F. Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. 2003 Risk Anal.. 25 961-972

88. Prime Minister׳s Office, Local councils to receive millions in business rates from shale gas developments. 2014 GOV.UK: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

89. Rogers, H. Shale gas—the unfolding story. 2011 Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy. 27 117-143

90. Royal Academy of Engineering, Shale Gas Extraction in the UK: A Review of Hydraulic Fracturing. 2012 The Royal Society and The Royal Academy of Engineering: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
91. Runhaar, H. ; Dieperink, C. ; Driessen, P. Policy analysis for sustainable development: the toolbox for the environmental social scientists. 2006 Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ.. 7 34-56
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
92. Rydin, Y. Conflict, Consensus and Rationality in Environmental Planning: An Institutional Discourse Approach. 2003 Oxford University Press: Oxford
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
93. Sawer, P. Fracking protests head north as activists mass on proposed Manchester shale gas exploration sites. 2013 The Telegraph: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
94. Schlosberg, D. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. 2007 Oxford University Press: Oxford
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
95. Schlumberger, 2005. Shale Gas White Paper. 05-OF299, Schlumberger Marketing Communications, Texas.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
96. Schulz, H.-M. ; Horsfield, B. ; Sachsenhofer, R.F. Shale gas in Europe: a regional overview and current research activities. 2010 Geological Society: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

97. Scrase, J.I. ; Ockwell, D.G. The role of discourse and linguistic framing effects in sustaining high carbon energy policy—an accessible introduction. 2010 Energy Policy. 38 2225-2233

98. Simmons, P. ; Walker, G. Living with technological risk: industrial encroachment on sense of place. 2004 En : Boholm, Å. ; Löfstedt, R. Facility Siting: Risk, Power and Identity in Land-use Planning. Earthscan: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
99. Slovic, P. Perceived risk, trust and democracy. 1993 Risk Anal.. 13-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
100. Slovic, P. Perception of risk. 1987 Science. 236 280-285
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
101. Smith, M.F. ; Ferguson, D.P. “Fracking democracy”: issue management and locus of policy decision-making in the Marcellus Shale gas drilling debate. 2013 Pub. Relat. Rev.. 39 377-386
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
102. Smith, N. Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. 1984 Blackwell: Oxford
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
103. Smith, N. ; Turner, P. ; Williams, G. UK data and analysis for shale gas prospectivity. 2010 Petrol. Geol. Conf. Ser.. 7 1087-1098
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

104. Stephenson, E. ; Doukas, A. ; Shaw, K. “Greenwashing gas: might a ‘transition fuel’ label legitimize carbon-intensive natural gas development?”. 2012 Energy Policy. 46 452-459

105. Stevens, P. The ‘Shale Gas Revolution’: Hype and Reality. 2010 Chatham House: London
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
106. Swyngedouw, E. Globalisation or ‘glocalisation’? Networks, territories and rescaling. 2004 Camb. Rev. Int. Aff.. 17 25-48
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
107. Szarka, J. Wind power, discourse coalitions and climate change: breaking the stalemate?. 2004 Eur. Environ.. 14 317-330
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
108. Theodori, L. Paradoxical perceptions of problems associated with unconventional natural gas development. 2009 South. Rural Sociol.. 24 97-117
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
109. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2013. Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries Outside the United States. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
110. Usher, M. Defending and transcending local identity through environmental discourse. 2013 Environ. Politics. 22 811-831
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
111. Vagnetti, R.M. Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer. 2009 Ground Water Protection Council: Oklahoma City
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
112. Vaughan, A. Fracking incentives will give councils ‘contradictory roles’. 2014 The Guardian, Guardian Media Group: London
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

113. Wakamatsu, H. ; Kentaka, A. The impact of the shale gas revolution on the U.S. and Japanese natural gas markets. 2013 Energy Policy. 62 1002-1009

114. Walker, G. Beyond distribution and proximity: exploring the multiple spatialities of environmental justice. 2009 Antipode. 41 614-636
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
115. Walker, G. ; Mitchell, G. ; Fairburn, J. ; Smith, G. Industrial pollution and social deprivation: evidence and complexity in evaluating and responding to environmental inequality. 2005 Local Environ.. 10 361-377
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
116. Watt, N. Fracking in the UK: ‘We׳re going all out for shale,’ admits Cameron. 2014 The Guardian, Guardian Media Group: London
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
117. Webb, T. Frack the North first, shale gas boss Neil O׳Brien urges. 2013 The Times: London
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
118. Weston, A. MP ‘warning’ over fracking. 2013 Liverpool Echo: Liverpool
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
119. Whitmarsh, L. ; Seyfang, G. ; O׳Neill, S. Public engagement with carbon and climate change: to what extent is the public ‘carbon capable’?. 2011 Global Environ. Change. 21 56-65
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
120. Wood, J. The Global Anti-Fracking Movement: What it Wants, How it Operates and What Next. 2012 Control Risks Group: London
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
121. Wynne, B. Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. 2001 Sci. Culture. 10 445-481
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
122. Wynne, B. Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity. 1993 Pub. Underst. Sci.. 2 321-337
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
123. Wynveen, B.J. A thematic analysis of local respondents perceptions of Barnett Shale energy development. 2011 J. Rural Soc. Sci.. 26 8-31
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
124. Zinken, J. ; Hellsten, I. ; Nerlich, B. Discourse metaphors. 2008 En : . De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
125. Zobak, M. ; Kitasei, S. ; Copithorne, B. Addressing the Environmental Risks from Shale Gas Development. 2010 Worldwatch Institute: Washington, DC
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

1. Dynamic price linkage of energies in transformation: Evidence from quantile connectedness. (2022). Chang, Tsangyao ; Yuan, XI ; Umar, Muhammad ; Su, Chi-Wei.
   In: Resources Policy.
   RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:78:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722003312.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Nonlinear effects of climate policy uncertainty and financial speculation on the global prices of oil and gas. (2022). Luo, Weijie ; Long, Shaobo ; Guo, Jiaqi.
   In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
   RePEc:eee:finana:v:83:y:2022:i:c:s1057521922002423.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Booming gas - A theory of endogenous technological change in resource extraction. (2021). Quaas, Martin ; Meier, Felix D.
   In: Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
   RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:240207.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Booming gas – A theory of endogenous technological change in resource extraction. (2021). Quaas, Martin ; Meier, Felix D.
   In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
   RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:107:y:2021:i:c:s0095069621000309.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Navigating transfer pricing risk in the oil and gas sector: Essential elements of a policy framework for Trinidad and Tobago and Guyana. (2021). McLean, Sheldon ; Charles, Don ; Rajkumar, Antonio.
   In: Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for The Caribbean.
   RePEc:ecr:col033:46813.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Navigating transfer pricing risk in the oil and gas sector: Essential elements of a policy framework for Trinidad and Tobago and Guyana. (2021). McLean, Sheldon ; Charles, Don ; Rajkumar, Antonio.
   In: Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for The Caribbean.
   RePEc:ecr:col033:46657.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Do structural shocks in the crude oil market affect biofuel prices?. (2020). Sweidan, Osama ; Maghyereh, Aktham.
   In: International Economics.
   RePEc:eee:inteco:v:164:y:2020:i:c:p:183-193.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Market reforms and determinants of import natural gas prices in China. (2020). Zhang, Dayong ; Shi, Xunpeng ; Ji, Qiang ; Wang, Tiantian.
   In: Energy.
   RePEc:eee:energy:v:196:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220302127.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Price and Volatility Spillovers between Crude Oil and Natural Gas markets in Europe and Japan-Korea. (2020). Perifanis, Theodosios ; Dagoumas, Athanasios.
   In: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.
   RePEc:eco:journ2:2020-05-50.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Fuel Switch to LNG in Heavy Truck Traffic. (2019). Juki, Lucija ; Smajla, Ivan ; Sedlar, Daria Karasalihovi ; Drljaa, Branko.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:515-:d:203910.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Co-movements amongst Gold and Oil: A Multivariate Time-Varying Asymmetric Approach. (2019). Toumi, Sirine.
    In: International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management.
    RePEc:ers:ijfirm:v:9:y:2019:i:3-4:p:52-68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. The roles of inter-fuel substitution and inter-market contagion in driving energy prices: evidences from China’s coal market. (2019). Li, Jianglong ; Long, Houyin ; Xie, Chunping.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:102540.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Correlations and volatility spillovers between oil, natural gas, and stock prices in India. (2019). Tiwari, Aviral ; Pradhan, Ashis ; Kumar, Satish ; Kang, Sang Hoon.
    In: Resources Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:62:y:2019:i:c:p:282-291.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Causality in quantiles and dynamic relations in energy markets: (De)tails matter. (2019). Andersson, Jonas ; Kyritsis, Evangelos.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:133:y:2019:i:c:s0301421519305208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. The roles of inter-fuel substitution and inter-market contagion in driving energy prices: Evidences from China’s coal market. (2019). Li, Jianglong ; Long, Houyin ; Xie, Chunping.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:84:y:2019:i:c:s0140988319303202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. The US Shale Gas Revolution and Its Externality on Crude Oil Prices: A Counterfactual Analysis. (2018). Li, Jianglong ; Liu, Hongxun.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:697-:d:134713.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Persistence of Oil Prices in Gas Import Prices and the Resilience of the Oil-Indexation Mechanism. The Case of Spanish Gas Import Prices. (2018). Cansado-Bravo, Pablo ; Rodriguez-Monroy, Carlos.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:3486-:d:190416.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Natural Gas Engine Technologies: Challenges and Energy Sustainability Issue. (2018). Chala, Girma T ; Hagos, Ftwi Y ; Abd, Abd Rashid.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:2934-:d:178675.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Price and Volatility Spillovers Between the US Crude Oil and Natural Gas Wholesale Markets. (2018). Perifanis, Theodosios ; Dagoumas, Athanasios.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:10:p:2757-:d:175678.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Valuation of proved vs. probable oil and gas reserves. (2017). Osmundsen, Petter ; Misund, Bård ; McMillan, David.
    In: Cogent Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:1385443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Gas generation and wind power: A review of unlikely allies in the United Kingdom and Ireland. (2017). Higgins, Paraic ; Li, Kang ; Devlin, Joseph ; Foley, Aoife.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:70:y:2017:i:c:p:757-768.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Natural gas vs. oil in U.S. transportation: Will prices confer an advantage to natural gas?. (2017). , Stephen.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:110:y:2017:i:c:p:210-221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Estimating the price premium of LNG in Korea and Japan: The price formula approach. (2017). Choi, Gobong ; Heo, Eunnyeong.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:109:y:2017:i:c:p:676-684.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. The relationship between regional natural gas markets and crude oil markets from a multi-scale nonlinear Granger causality perspective. (2017). Ji, Qiang ; Fan, Ying ; Geng, Jiang-Bo.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:67:y:2017:i:c:p:98-110.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. How does the U.S. natural gas market react to demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market?. (2017). Serletis, Apostolos ; Jadidzadeh, Ali.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:66-74.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. East Asia’s gas-market failure and distinctive economics—A case study of low oil prices. (2017). Shi, Xunpeng.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:195:y:2017:i:c:p:800-809.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. An assessment of price convergence between natural gas and solar photovoltaic in the U.S. electricity market. (2017). Nyangon, Joseph ; Byrne, John ; Taminiau, Job.
    In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment.
    RePEc:bla:wireae:v:6:y:2017:i:3:n:e238.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Price Comovement Between Biodiesel and Natural Gas. (2016). Janda, Karel ; Kourilek, Jakub.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:74887.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Description of Biofuels and Shale Gas Development. (2016). Janda, Karel ; Kourilek, Jakub.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:74885.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Supply and demand determinants of natural gas price volatility in the U.K.: A vector autoregression approach. (2016). Oglend, Atle ; Misund, Bård.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:111:y:2016:i:c:p:178-189.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. The geopolitical impact of the shale revolution: Exploring consequences on energy prices and rentier states. (2016). Auping, Willem L ; de Jong, Sijbren ; Kwakkel, Jan H ; Pruyt, Erik.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:98:y:2016:i:c:p:390-399.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. The impact of the North American shale gas revolution on regional natural gas markets: Evidence from the regime-switching model. (2016). Ji, Qiang ; Fan, Ying ; Geng, Jiang-Bo.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:96:y:2016:i:c:p:167-178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Trade with endogenous transportation costs: The case of liquefied natural gas. (2016). Osmundsen, Petter ; Oglend, Atle ; Kleppe, Tore.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:59:y:2016:i:c:p:138-148.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Marcellus Shale and structural breaks in oil and gas markets: The case of Pennsylvania. (2016). Yerger, David ; Potts, Todd B.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:50-58.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Ekonomiczne skutki eksploatacji gazu łupkowego. (2015). Boratyski, Jakub.
    In: Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics.
    RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2015:i:1:p:55-82.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE PRODUCTION OF SHALE GAS POTENTIAL: THE CASE OF TURKEY. (2015). Ar, Yilmaz Onur ; Bayramolu, Turgut.
    In: Global Economic Observer.
    RePEc:ntu:ntugeo:vol3-iss2-15-004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Probable Oil and Gas Reserves and Shareholder Returns: The Impact of Shale Gas. (2015). Osmundsen, Petter ; Misund, Bård.
    In: UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:hhs:stavef:2015_017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Supply and Demand Determinants of Natural Gas Price Volatility in the U.K.: A Vector Autoregression Approach. (2015). Oglend, Atle ; Misund, Bård.
    In: UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:hhs:stavef:2015_010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Scenarios for shale gas development and their related land use impacts in the Baltic Basin, Northern Poland. (2015). Batelaan, Okke ; Pelletier, Nathan ; Vandecasteele, Ine ; Mari, Ines ; Baranzelli, Claudia ; Lavalle, Carlo ; Barranco, Ricardo Ribeiro.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:84:y:2015:i:c:p:80-95.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Probable Oil and Gas Reserves and Shareholder Returns: The Impact of Shale Gas. (2015). Osmundsen, Petter ; Misund, Bård.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_5687.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Future for offshore wind energy in the United Kingdom: The way forward. (2014). Ruan, X. ; Zuofa, T. ; Potts, S. J. ; Price, A. D. F., ; Ochieng, E. G. ; Egbu, C. O. ; Melaine, Y..
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:39:y:2014:i:c:p:655-666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Natural gas from shale formation – The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States. (2014). Chen, XI ; Wang, Qiang ; Rogers, Howard ; Jha, Awadhesh N..
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:30:y:2014:i:c:p:1-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis. (2014). Cotton, Matthew ; van Alstine, James ; Rattle, Imogen .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:73:y:2014:i:c:p:427-438.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Scenario analysis of nonresidential natural gas consumption in Italy. (2014). Bianco, Vincenzo ; Tagliafico, Luca A. ; Scarpa, Federico.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:113:y:2014:i:c:p:392-403.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Exploring the uncertainty around potential shale gas development – A global energy system analysis based on TIAM (TIMES Integrated Assessment Model). (2013). Zeniewski, Peter ; Gracceva, Francesco.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:57:y:2013:i:c:p:443-457.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. How does oil market uncertainty interact with other markets? An empirical analysis of implied volatility index. (2013). Ji, Qiang ; Fan, Ying ; Liu, Ming-Lei.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:55:y:2013:i:c:p:860-868.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Evaluation of the long-term power generation mix: The case study of South Koreas energy policy. (2013). Chung, Jaewoo ; Min, Daiki.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:62:y:2013:i:c:p:1544-1552.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. The impact of the shale gas revolution on the U.S. and Japanese natural gas markets. (2013). Aruga, Kentaka ; Wakamatsu, Hiroki.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:62:y:2013:i:c:p:1002-1009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Price discovery in European natural gas markets. (2013). Swieringa, John ; Schultz, Emma.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:61:y:2013:i:c:p:628-634.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. How Does the U.S. Natural Gas Market React to Demand and Supply Shocks in the Crude Oil Market?. (2002). Serletis, Apostolos ; Jadidzadeh, Ali.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:clg:wpaper:2017-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-06 16:04:19 || Missing content? Let us know