create a website

It takes an ecosystem: Socioecological factors influencing equity-oriented evaluation in New England, U.S., 2021. (2022). Alvarez, Kayla Benitez ; Madres, Joseph ; Hall, Jori N ; Gates, Emily F.
In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
RePEc:eee:epplan:v:92:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000222.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 65

References cited by this document

Cocites: 56

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Evaluating Research for Development: Innovation to Navigate Complexity. (2023). Szabo, Sylvia ; Snijder, Mieke ; Apgar, Marina ; Higdon, Grace Lyn.
    In: The European Journal of Development Research.
    RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:35:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1057_s41287-023-00577-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning. (2023). Teasdale, Rebecca M ; Strasser, Mikayla ; Graham, Kara E ; Moore, Ceily.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:97:y:2023:i:c:s0149718923000034.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Al Hudib, H. ; Cousins, J.B. Evaluation policy and organizational evaluation capacity building: Application of an ecological framework across cultural contexts. Journal of Multidisciplinary. 2020 Evaluation. 16 37-56
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. American Evaluation Association (AEA). (2018). American Evaluation Association: Guiding principles for evaluators. 〈https://www.eval.org/About/Guiding-Principles〉.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. American Evaluation Association. (2011). American Evaluation Association statement on cultural competence in evaluation. 〈www.eval.org/About/Competencies-Standards/Cutural-Competence-Statement〉.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Anderson, M.A. ; Mastri, A. Culturally responsive and equitable evaluation for federal evaluation staff. 2021 Mathematica. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Andrews, K. ; Parekh, J. ; Peckoo, S. How to embed a racial and ethnic equity perspective in research: Practical guidance for the research process. 2019 Child Trends. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Bamberger, M. ; Segone, M. How to design and manage equity-oriented evaluations. 2011 UNICEF. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Boyce, A.S. Lessons learned using a values-engaged approach to attend to culture, diversity, and equity in a STEM program evaluation. 2017 Evaluation and Program Planning. 64 33-43

  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. Ecological models of human development. 1994 Elsevier,:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. 1981 Harvard University Press,:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Caldwell, L.D. ; Bledsoe, K.L. Can social justice live in a house of structural racism? A question for the field of evaluation. 2019 American Journal of Evaluation. 40 6-18
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Carden, F. Asking questions in the solution space: Methodological issues in evaluating equity. 2013 Evaluation and Program Planning. 36 213-217

  12. Center for Evaluation Innovation. (2017). Equitable evaluation project framing paper. 〈www.equitableeval.org/blog-main/2017/7/17/equitable-evaluation-framing-paper〉.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Cerna, O., Condliffe, B., & Wilson, A. (2021). Guiding questions for supporting culturally responsive evaluation practices and an equity-based perspectives. 〈www.mdrc.org/publication/guiding-questions-supporting-culturally-responsive-evaluation-practices-and-equity-based〉.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Change Elemental. (2021). Deep equity. 〈https://changeelemental.org/offerings/deep-equity/〉.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Charmaz, K. . 2014 SAGE:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Creswell, J.W. ; Poth, C.N. . 2018 SAGE,:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Datta, L.E. Who pays the piper: Funding sources and evaluation’s contribution to equity. 2016 En : Donaldson, S. ; Picciotto, R. Evaluation for an Equitable Society. Information Age Publishing:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Dean-Coffey, J. What’s race got to do with it? Equity and philanthropic evaluation practice. 2018 American Journal of Evaluation. 39 527-542
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Dean-Coffey, J. (2017) Equitable Evaluation Framework™️. Equitable Evaluation Initiative. 〈https://www.equitableeval.org/framework〉.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Donaldson, S.I. ; Picciotto, R. Evaluation for an Equitable Society. 2016 Information Age Publishing:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Eisenhart, M. Generalization from qualitative inquiry. 2009 En : Erickan, K. ; Roth, W.-M. Generalizing from Educational Research: Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Polarization. Routledge:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Equitable Evaluation Initiative (EEI) & Grantmakers for Effective Organizations (GEO). (2021). Shifting the evaluation paradigm: The Equitable Evaluation Framework. 〈www.equitableeval.org/blog-main/shifting-the-evaluation-paradigm-the-equitable-evaluation-framework-eef〉.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Farrow, F. ; Morrison, S. Placing equity concerns at the center of knowledge development. 2019 Center for the Study of Social Policy. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Forestieri, M. Equity implications evaluating development aid: The Italian case. 2020 Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation. 16 65-90
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Garibay, C. ; Teasdale, R.M. Equity and evaluation in informal STEM education. 2019 En : Fu, A.C. ; Kannan, A. ; Shavelson, R.J. . Wiley Periodicals, Inc.:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Gates, E.F. Toward Valuing With Critical Systems Heuristics. 2018 American Journal of Evaluation. 39 201-220
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Gates, E.F. ; Walton, M. ; Vidueira, P. ; McNall, M. Introducing systems- and complexity-informed evaluation. 2021 En : Gates, E.F. ; Walton, M. ; Vidueira, P. Systems and Complexity-Informed Evaluation: Insights from Practice. New Directions for Evaluation. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Gates, E.F., Williamson, E., Madres, J., Benitez Alvarez, K., & Hall, J.N. (2021). Strengthening capacity for equity in New England evaluation (SCENE) short report.https://barrfdn.issuelab.org/resource/strengthening-capacity-and-equity-in-new-england-evaluation.html.

  29. Giacomini, M. ; Hurley, J. Issues in evaluating equity. 2008 Springer,:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Gilmore, G.D. Enabling factors. 2013 Oxford Bibliographies. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Gordillo, L. ; Neuner, R. ; Josephson, L. ; Beriont, L. Evaluation as an ecosystem: Building our ability to collaborate effectively. 2020 American Evaluation Association. 365-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Greene, J. (2014). Values-engaged evaluation. In M. Bamberger & M. Segone (Eds), Evaluation for equitable development results (pp. 196–206). UNICEF.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Greene, J.C. Advancing equity: Cultivating an evaluation habit. 2016 En : Donaldson, S.I. ; Picciotto, R. Evaluation for an equitable society. Information Age:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Hall, J.N. The Other Side of Inequality: Using Standpoint Theories to Examine the Privilege of the Evaluation Profession and Individual Evaluators. 2020 American Journal of Evaluation. 41 20-33
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Hall, M.E. Blest be the tie that binds. 2020 New Directions for Evaluation. 166 13-22
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Hall, M.E. Evaluation’s Race Problem in the United States: A Call to Action for the Profession and the American Journal of Evaluation. 2018 . American Journal of Evaluation. 39 569-583
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Hawn Nelson, A. ; Jenkins, D. ; Zanti, S. ; Katz, M. ; Berkowitz, E. A toolkit for centering racial equity throughout data integration. Actionable Intelligence for Social Policy. 2020 University of Pennsylvania. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Hood, S. ; Hopson, R.K. ; Kirkhart, K.E. Culturally responsive evaluation. 2015 Handbook of practical program evaluation. 281-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Hopson, R. ; Kirkhart, K.E. ; Bledsoe, K.L. Decolonizing evaluation in a developing world: Implications and cautions for equity-oriented evaluation. 2012 Evaluation for equitable development results. 59-82
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. House, E. ; Howe, K.R. Values in Evaluation and Social Research. 1999 SAGE:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. House, E.R. Conflict of interest and Campbellian validity. 2011 New Directions for Evaluation. 130 69-80
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. House, E.R. Evaluation and the framing of race. 2017 American Journal of Evaluation. 38 167-189
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Hwalek, M.A. ; Straub, V.L. The small sellers of program evaluation services in the United States. 2018 En : Nielsen, S.B. ; Lemire, S. ; Christie, C.A. The Evaluation Marketplace: Exploring the Evaluation Industry. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. LaFrance, J. ; Nichols, R. Indigenous evaluation framework: Telling our story in our place and time. 2009 American Higher Education Consortium. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Lemire, S. ; Fierro, L.A. ; Kinarsky, A.R. ; Fujita-Conrads, E. ; Christie, C.A. ). The U.S. federal evaluation market. 2018 New Directions for Evaluation. 160 63-80
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Lemire, S. ; Nielsen, S.B. ; Christie, C.A. Toward understanding the evaluation market and its industry: Advancing a research agenda. 2018 New Directions for Evaluation. 160 145-163
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Letiecq, B.L. ; Bailey, S.J. Evaluating from the outside: Conducting cross-cultural evaluation research on an American Indian reservation. 2004 Evaluation Review. 28 342-357
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Lo, F. ; Espiritu, R. Evaluation is so white: Systemic wrongs reinforced by common practices and how to start righting them. 2021 Funder & Evaluator Affinity Network. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Lucas, K. ; van Wee, B. ; Maat, K. A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: Combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches. 2016 Transportation. 43 473-490

  50. Marra, M. Micro, meso, and macro dimensions of change: A new agenda for the evaluation of structural policies. 2011 En : Forss, K. ; Marra, M. ; Schwartz, R. Evaluating the complex: Attribution, contribution, and beyond. Comparative Policy Evaluation. Transaction Publishers:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Mathison, S. Confronting capitalism: Evaluation that fosters social equity.. 2016 En : Donaldson, S. ; Picciotto, R. Evaluation for an equitable society. Information Age Publishing:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Maxwell, J. . 2013 SAGE:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Mendez, K. ; Taniuchi, A. Expanding the Bench™ week: Culturally responsive and equitable evaluation: What is it and why is it important?. 2020 American Evaluation Association. 365 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Nowell, L.S. ; Norris, J.M. ; White, D.E. ; Moules, N.J. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. 2017 International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 16 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Patton, M.Q. . 2015 SAGE:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Peck, L. The big evaluation enterprises in the United States. 2018 En : Nielsen, S.B. ; Lemire, S. ; Christie, C.A. The Evaluation Marketplace: Exploring the Evaluation Industry. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Public Policy Associates Inc, . 2015 Considerations for conducting evaluation using a culturally responsive and racial equity lens. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Reid, A.M. ; Boyce, A.S. ; Adetogun, A. ; Moller, J.R. ; Avent, C. If not us, then who? Evaluators of color and social change. 2020 New Directions for Evaluation. 166 23-36
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Robinson, O.C. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. 2014 Qualitative Research in Psychology. 11 25-41
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Rogers, P.J. Understanding and supporting equity: Implications of methodological and procedural choices in equity-oriented evaluations. In S. Donaldson & R. Picciotto (Eds.). 2016 Information Age Publishing,:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Shanker, V. (2021). Statement from the AEA Board of Directors Regarding Racism and Inequality in our Society. American Evaluation Association. 〈www.eval.org/Full-Article/statement-from-the-aea-board-of-directors-regarding-racism-and-inequality-in-our-society〉.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Stake, R.E. Finding merit, diminishing hurtful discrimination, with less pursuit of meritocracy. 2016 En : Donaldson, S. ; Picciotto, R. Evaluation for an Equitable Society. Information Age Publishing:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Teasdale, R.M. Evaluative criteria: An integrated model of domains and sources. 2021 American Journal of Evaluation. 42 354-376
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Westaby, K.A. ; Williams, T.M. ; Robinson, N.N. ; Connors, E. Being responsive: The first assessment of culturally responsive evaluation in Wisconsin: Findings from the 2017 survey. 2019 Milwaukee Evaluation!, Inc. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Williams, B. Prosaic or profound? The adoption of systems ideas by impact evaluation. 2015 IDS Bulletin. 46 7-16

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. An evaluation of a 9th and 10th grade Native American virtual pilot: Utilizing a culturally responsive and Inclusive Science model. (2025). Francis, Carolee Dodge ; Bareng-Antolin, Noehealani ; Hjelm, Linnea L.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:110:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000308.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The criticality of language: Exploring STEM education evaluators conceptualizations of equity, diversity, and inclusion and the influence on their roles and practice. (2025). Avent, Cherie M.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:108:y:2025:i:c:s0149718924001137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning. (2023). Teasdale, Rebecca M ; Strasser, Mikayla ; Graham, Kara E ; Moore, Ceily.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:97:y:2023:i:c:s0149718923000034.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The equity implications of TOD in Curitiba. (2022). PEREIRA, RAFAEL ; Firmino, Rodrigo.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:cj87q.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. A mixed methods approach to the social assessment of transport infrastructure projects. (2022). Lucas, Karen ; Philips, Ian ; Verlinghieri, Ersilia.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:49:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11116-021-10176-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. When monetarisation and ranking are not appropriate. A novel stakeholder-based appraisal method. (2022). Keseru, Imre ; Te, Geert ; Macharis, Cathy.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:156:y:2022:i:c:p:192-205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. It takes an ecosystem: Socioecological factors influencing equity-oriented evaluation in New England, U.S., 2021. (2022). Alvarez, Kayla Benitez ; Madres, Joseph ; Hall, Jori N ; Gates, Emily F.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:92:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Socioeconomic variations and disparity in space€“time accessibility in suburban China: A case study of Guangzhou. (2021). Chen, Zifeng ; Yeh, Anthony Gar-On.
    In: Urban Studies.
    RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:4:p:750-768.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A multi-objective optimization approach to balancing economic efficiency and equity in accessibility to multi-use paths. (2021). Chen, NA ; Wang, Chih-Hao.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:48:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11116-020-10117-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The Concept of Fairness in Relation to Women Transport Users. (2021). McQuaid, Ronald ; Hail, Yvonne.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2919-:d:512683.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Assessing the inequalities in access to online delivery services and the way COVID-19 pandemic affects marginalization. (2021). Sanchez-Diaz, Ivan ; Vural, Ceren Altuntas ; Halldorsson, Arni.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:109:y:2021:i:c:p:24-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Intersectionality based policy analysis: Equity in mobility in India. (2021). Peden, Margaret ; Jagnoor, Jagnoor ; Kakar, Inayat Singh.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:101:y:2021:i:c:p:14-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Why do Gender Differences in Daily Mobility Behaviours persist among workers?. (2021). Havet, Nathalie ; BONNEL, Patrick ; Bayart, Caroline.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:145:y:2021:i:c:p:34-48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. An equity-based transport network criticality analysis. (2021). Jafino, Bramka Arga.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:144:y:2021:i:c:p:204-221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Comparing walking accessibility variations between groceries and other retail activities for seniors. (2021). Soria-Lara, Julio A ; Ariza-Alvarez, Amor ; Arranz-Lopez, Aldo.
    In: Research in Transportation Economics.
    RePEc:eee:retrec:v:87:y:2021:i:c:s0739885919302574.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Walk this way: Pedestrian accessibility and equity in Barranquilla and Soledad, Colombia. (2021). Arellana, Julian ; Alvarez, Vilma ; Guzman, Luis A ; Oviedo, Daniel.
    In: Research in Transportation Economics.
    RePEc:eee:retrec:v:86:y:2021:i:c:s0739885920302225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Short-term forecasts on individual accessibility in bus system based on neural network model. (2021). Liu, Zhiyuan ; Zuo, Yufan ; Fu, Xiao ; Huang, DI.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:93:y:2021:i:c:s0966692321001289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Analysis of job accessibility promoted by ride hailing services: A proposed method. (2021). Dos, Talita Floriano ; Vieira, Marcelino Aurelio ; da Cruz, Luiz Emerson ; Guimares, Gabriella Vitorino ; Correa, Filipe Almeida ; de Oliveira, Camilla.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:93:y:2021:i:c:s0966692321001010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Balancing time: Using a new accessibility measure in Rio de Janeiro. (2021). Orrico, Romulo ; Carneiro, Mariana S ; Luz, Gregorio ; Falavigna, Claudio.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:90:y:2021:i:c:s0966692320310012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Disparidad espacial en la accesibilidad a los servicios de salud hospitalarios en Cali, Colombia. (2021). Sisto, N ; Vivas, H ; Rodriguez, D A.
    In: Documentos de trabajo - Alianza EFI.
    RePEc:col:000561:019591.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Disparities in access to opportunities across neighborhoods types: a case study from the Los Angeles region. (2020). Shin, Eun Jin.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:47:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11116-018-9862-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Socio-Spatial Concerns in Urban Mobility Planning: Insights from Competing Policies in Quito. (2020). Porreca, Riccardo ; Vecchio, Giovanni ; Rivera, Daniela Jacome.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2923-:d:342173.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Assessment for the Social Sustainability and Equity under the Perspective of Accessibility to Jobs. (2020). Fernandes, Vicente Aprigliano ; Santos, Talita Floriano ; Vieira, Marcelino Aurelio ; Cordoba, Jorge Eliecer ; Guimares, Gabriella Vitorino.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10132-:d:456755.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Examining the Social Outcomes from Urban Transport Infrastructure: Long-Term Consequences of Spatial Changes and Varied Interests at Multiple Levels. (2020). Lee, Juhyun ; Arts, Jos ; Ward, John ; Vanclay, Frank.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:5907-:d:388174.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Spatial Difference and Equity Analysis for Accessibility to Three-Level Medical Services Based on Actual Medical Behavior in Shaanxi, China. (2020). Dang, Xing ; Wang, Kan ; Bai, Jianjun.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:112-:d:468641.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. A literature review on accessibility using bibliometric analysis techniques. (2020). Shi, Yuji ; Blainey, Simon ; Jing, Peng ; Sun, Chao.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:87:y:2020:i:c:s096669231931004x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Equity of transit connectivity in Tennessee cities. (2020). Welch, Timothy F ; Mishra, Sabyasachee ; Golias, Mihalis M ; Sharma, Ishant ; Cherry, Christopher R.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:86:y:2020:i:c:s0966692319307197.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Job accessibility through public transport and unemployment in Latin America: The case of Montevideo (Uruguay). (2020). Massobrio, Renzo ; Hansz, Martin ; Hernandez, Diego.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:85:y:2020:i:c:s0966692319308695.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Microstories of everyday mobilities and opportunities in Bogotá: A tool for bringing capabilities into urban mobility planning. (2020). Vecchio, Giovanni.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:83:y:2020:i:c:s0966692319302662.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Accessibility measurements in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Curitiba and Recife, Brazil. (2020). Boisjoly, Genevieve ; Oliveira, Gabriel T ; Serra, Bernardo ; El-Geneidy, Ahmed.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:82:y:2020:i:c:s0966692318304332.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Availability and inequality in accessibility of health centre-based primary healthcare in Ethiopia. (2019). Takian, Amirhossein ; Olyaeemanesh, Alireza ; Sari, Ali Akbari ; Woldemichael, Abraha.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0213896.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Sustainability Development of High-Speed Rail and Airline—Understanding Passengers’ Preferences: A Case Study of the Beijing–Shanghai Corridor. (2019). Zhang, Zhenchao ; Luan, Weixin ; Su, Min ; Yuan, Liuyan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1352-:d:210859.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Measuring Cross-Border Road Accessibility in the European Union. (2019). Christodoulou, Aris ; Christidis, Panayotis.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4000-:d:251062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Understanding travel and differential capabilities and functionings in Beijing. (2019). Hickman, Robin ; Cao, Mengqiu.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:83:y:2019:i:c:p:46-56.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Egalitarianism and public perception of social inequities: A case study of Beijing congestion charge. (2019). Liu, Yang ; Lucas, Karen ; Marsden, Greg.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:74:y:2019:i:c:p:47-62.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Inequalities in access to bike-and-ride opportunities: Findings for the city of Malmö. (2019). Hamidi, Zahra ; Camporeale, Rosalia ; Caggiani, Leonardo.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:130:y:2019:i:c:p:673-688.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Exploring the equity performance of bike-sharing systems with disaggregated data: A story of southern Tampa. (2019). Chen, Zhiwei ; Zhang, YU ; Guo, Yujie ; Li, Xiaopeng ; Stuart, Amy L.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:130:y:2019:i:c:p:529-545.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. A spatially-explicit method for analyzing the equity of transit commuters accessibility. (2019). Benenson, Itzhak ; Ben-Elia, Eran.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:120:y:2019:i:c:p:31-42.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Trespassing for mobilities. Operational directions for addressing mobile lives. (2019). Pucci, Paola ; Vecchio, Giovanni.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:81:y:2019:i:c:s0966692318308391.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The long road to achieving equity: Job accessibility restrictions and overlapping inequalities in the city of São Paulo. (2019). Giannotti, Mariana ; de Fatima, Maria ; Tomasiello, Diego Bogado ; Slovic, Anne Dorothee ; Nardocci, Adelaide C.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:78:y:2019:i:c:p:181-193.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Implementation and evaluation of a biotechnology research experience for African-American high school students. (2019). Platt, Manu O ; Destefano, Lizanne ; Servance, Lakeita ; Avent, Cherie ; Boyce, Ayesha S ; Adetogun, Adeyemo ; Nerem, Robert.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:72:y:2019:i:c:p:162-169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Resilience and accessibility of Swedish and Dutch municipalities. (2018). Östh, John ; Reggiani, Aura ; Nijkamp, Peter ; Osth, John.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:45:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s11116-017-9854-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Study of the Impact of a High-Speed Railway Opening on China’s Accessibility Pattern and Spatial Equality. (2018). Li, Xueming ; Huang, Tai ; Yang, Jun ; Guo, Andong.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2943-:d:164546.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Accessibility Changes: Analysis of the Integrated Public Transport System of Bogotá. (2018). Cardona, Rafael ; Guzman, Luis A ; Oviedo, Daniel.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3958-:d:179366.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Subway network expansion and transit equity: A case study of Gwangju metropolitan area, South Korea. (2018). Song, Yena ; Ahn, Kwangwon ; Lee, Keumsook ; Kim, Hyun.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:72:y:2018:i:c:p:148-158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Accessibility, affordability and equity: Assessing ‘pro-poor’ public transport subsidies in Bogotá. (2018). Guzman, Luis A ; Oviedo, Daniel.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:68:y:2018:i:c:p:37-51.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Right to the city: Applying justice tests to public transport investments. (2018). Donovan, Stuart ; Adli, Saeid Nazari.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:66:y:2018:i:c:p:56-65.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Improving equity of urban transit systems with the adoption of origin-destination based taxi fares. (2018). Gallo, Mariano.
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:64:y:2018:i:c:p:38-55.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. A new approach to accessibility – Examining perceived accessibility in contrast to objectively measured accessibility in daily travel. (2018). Friman, Margareta ; Olsson, Lars E ; Lattman, Katrin.
    In: Research in Transportation Economics.
    RePEc:eee:retrec:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:501-511.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Evaluating equity and accessibility to jobs by public transport across Canada. (2018). Deboosere, Robbin ; El-Geneidy, Ahmed.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:73:y:2018:i:c:p:54-63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  51. Balancing equity and cost in rural transportation management with multi-objective utility analysis and data envelopment analysis: A case of Quinte West. (2017). Majkut, Kevin ; Sheu, Jiuh-Biing ; Achtari, Guyves ; Chen, Chialin.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:95:y:2017:i:c:p:148-165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  52. An empirical assessment of Dutch citizens preferences for spatial equality in the context of a national transport investment plan. (2017). van Cranenburgh, Sander ; Mouter, Niek ; van Wee, Bert.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:60:y:2017:i:c:p:217-230.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  53. Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region. (2017). Guzman, Luis A ; Oviedo, Daniel ; Rivera, Carlos.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:58:y:2017:i:c:p:236-246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  54. A multi-dimensional view of transport-related social exclusion: A comparative study of Greater Perth and Sydney. (2016). Litman, Todd ; Tiwari, Surya Prasad ; Daley, Rebekah ; Nesbitt, Joshua ; Xia, Jianhong ; Najnin, Arfanara .
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:94:y:2016:i:c:p:205-221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  55. CoAXs: A Collaborative Accessibility-based Stakeholder Engagement System for communicating transport impacts. (2016). Zegras, Christopher P ; Stewart, Anson F.
    In: Research in Transportation Economics.
    RePEc:eee:retrec:v:59:y:2016:i:c:p:423-433.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  56. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-06 02:36:35 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.