1. Sentry eyes? Women directors and corporate penalties. (2024). GULL, Ammar ; Ahsan, Tanveer ; Qureshi, Muhammad Azeem.
   In: Post-Print.
   RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04844672.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Does product market competition affect corporate waste management? International evidence. (2024). Atawnah, Nader ; Hossain, Md Zakir ; al Mamun, MD ; Badarin, Louy.
   In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
   RePEc:eee:reveco:v:95:y:2024:i:c:s1059056024004751.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Abbott, A. ; Nandeibam, S. ; O'Shea, L. Explaining the variation recycling rates across the UK. 2011 Ecological Economics. 70 2214-2223

2. Alam, M.S. ; Atif, M. ; Chien-Chi, C. ; Soytaş, U. Does corporate R&D investment affect firm environmental performance? Evidence from G-6 countries. 2019 Energy Economics. 78 401-411

3. Atif, M. ; Alam, M.S. ; Hossain, M. Firm sustainable investment: Are female directors greener?. 2020 Business Strategy and the Environment. 29 3449-3469

4. Atif, M. ; Ali, S. Environmental, social and governance disclosure and default risk. 2021 Business Strategy and the Environment. 30 3937-3959

5. Atif, M. ; Hossain, M. ; Alam, M.S. ; Goergen, M. Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consumption?. 2021 Journal of Corporate Finance. 66 -

6. Atif, M. ; Liu, B. ; Huang, A. Does board gender diversity affect corporate cash holdings?. 2019 Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 46 1003-1029

7. Benlemlih, M. ; Arif, M. ; Nadeem, M. Institutional ownership and greenhouse gas emissions: A comparative study of the UK and the USA. 2023 British Journal of Management. 34 623-647

8. Benson, B.W. ; Davidson, W.N. ; Wang, H. ; Worrell, D.L. Deviations from expected stakeholder management, firm value, and corporate governance. 2011 Financial Management. 40 39-81

9. Bilimoria, D. ; Piderit, S.K. Qualifications of corporate board committee members. 1994 Group and Organization Management. 19 334-362
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Booth, J.R. ; Deli, D.N. Factors affecting the number of outside directorships held by CEOs. 1996 Journal of Financial Economics. 40 81-104
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Boulouta, I. Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. 2013 Journal of Business Ethics. 113 185-197

12. Brown, W.O. ; Helland, E. ; Smith, J.K. Corporate philanthropic practices. 2006 Journal of Corporate Finance. 12 855-877

13. Burke, J.J. ; Hoitash, R. ; Hoitash, U. The heterogeneity of board-level sustainability committees and corporate social performance. 2019 Journal of Business Ethics. 154 1161-1186

14. Carvajal, M. ; Nadeem, M. ; Zaman, R. Biodiversity disclosure, sustainable development and environmental initiatives: Does board gender diversity matter?. 2022 Business Strategy and the Environment. 31 969-987

15. Cho, C.H. ; Roberts, R.W. ; Patten, D.M. The language of US corporate environmental disclosure. 2010 Accounting, Organizations and Society. 35 431-443

16. Cucari, N. ; Esposito De Falco, S. ; Orlando, B. Diversity of board of directors and environmental social governance: Evidence from Italian listed companies. 2018 Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 25 250-266

17. de Villiers, C. ; Jia, J. ; Li, Z. Are boards' risk management committees associated with firms' environmental performance?. 2022 The British Accounting Review. 54 -

18. de Villiers, C. ; Naiker, V. ; van Staden, C.J. The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. 2011 Journal of Management. 37 1636-1663
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Dixon-fowler, H. ; Ellstrand, A.E. ; Johnson, J.L. The role of board environmental committees in corporate environmental performance. 2017 Journal of Business Ethics. 140 423-438

20. Donaldson, T. ; Preston, L.E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. 1995 Academy of Management Review. 20 65-91
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Eberhardt-Toth, E. Who should be on a board corporate social responsibility committee?. 2017 Journal of Cleaner Production. 140 1926-1935

22. El Ghoul, S. ; Guedhami, O. ; Kwok, C.C. ; Mishra, D.R. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?. 2011 Journal of Banking & Finance. 35 2388-2406

23. Ferrara, I. ; Missios, P. A cross-country study of household waste prevention and recycling: Assessing the effectiveness of policy instruments. 2012 Land Economics. 88 710-744

24. Fox, M. ; Gibbs, M. ; Auerbach, D. Age and gender dimensions of friendship. 1985 Psychology of Women Quarterly. 11 59-68
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. Gangi, F. ; Daniele, L.M. ; Varrone, N. How do corporate environmental policy and corporate reputation affect risk-adjusted financial performance?. 2020 Business Strategy and the Environment. 29 1975-1991

26. García-Sánchez, I.M. ; Gómez-Miranda, M. ; Fátima, D. ; Rodríguez-Ariza, L. The explanatory effect of CSR committee and assurance services on the adoption of the IFC performance standards, as a means of enhancing corporate transparency. 2019 Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 10 773-797

27. García-Sánchez, I.M. ; Gómez-Miranda, M.E. ; David, F. ; Rodríguez-Ariza, L. Board independence and GRI-IFC performance standards: The mediating effect of the CSR committee. 2019 Journal of Cleaner Production. 225 554-562
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Gladstein, D.G. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. 1984 Administrative Science Quarterly. 29 499-517
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Goodstein, J. ; Gautam, K. ; Boeker, W. The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. 1994 Strategic Management Journal. 15 241-250

30. Gul, F.A. ; Leung, S. Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. 2004 Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 23 351-379

31. Gull, A.A. ; Atif, M. ; Ahsan, T. ; Derouiche, I. Does waste management affect firm performance?. 2022 International evidence. Economic Modelling. 114 -

32. Gull, A.A. ; Atif, M. ; Hussain, N. Board gender composition and waste management: Cross-country evidence. 2022 The British Accounting Review. 101097 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Haniffa, R.M. ; Cooke, T.E. The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. 2005 Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 24 391-430

34. Haque, F. ; Jones, M.J. European firms’ corporate biodiversity disclosures and board gender diversity from 2002 to 2016. 2020 The British Accounting Review. 52 -

35. Harjoto, M. ; Laksmana, I. ; Lee, R. Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. 2015 Journal of Business Ethics. 132 641-660

36. Helfaya, A. ; Moussa, T. Do board's corporate social responsibility strategy and orientation influence environmental sustainability disclosure? UK evidence. 2017 Business Strategy and the Environment. 26 1061-1077

37. Hermalin, B.E. ; Weisbach, M.S. Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. 2003 FRBNY Economic Policy Review. 7-26

38. Ibrahim, N.A. ; Angelidis, J.P. The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: Are there differences between inside and outside directors?. 1995 Journal of Business Ethics. 14 405-410
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

39. Jensen, M.C. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. 1993 Journal of Finance. 48 831-880

40. Jiang, W. ; Wan, H. ; Zhao, S. Reputation concerns of independent directors: Evidence from individual director voting. 2016 Review of Financial Studies. 29 655-696

41. Jo, H. ; Harjoto, M.A. Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. 2011 Journal of Business Ethics. 103 351-383

42. Kassinis, G. ; Vafeas, N. Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. 2002 Strategic Management Journal. 23 399-415
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Kesner, I.F. Directors characteristics and committee membership—An investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender. 1988 Academy of Management Journal. 31 66-84
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Kock, C.J. ; Santalo, J. ; Diestre, L. Corporate governance and the environment: What type of governance creates greener companies?. 2012 Journal of Management Studies. 49 492-514

45. Liao, L. ; Luo, L. ; Tang, Q. Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. 2015 The British Accounting Review. 47 409-424

46. Lorsch, J. ; MacIver, E. Pawns and potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards. 1989 Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Lu, J. ; Herremans, I.M. Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective. 2019 Business Strategy and the Environment. 28 1449-1464

48. Luoma, P. ; Goodstein, J. Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. 1999 Academy of Management Journal. 42 553-563
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

49. Makridis., Is recycling effective? Evidence from California between 2004 and 2017. 2021 Land Economics. 97 246-261

50. Muller-Kahle, M.I. ; Lewellyn, K.B. Did board configuration matter? The case of US subprime lenders. 2011 Corporate Governance: An International Review. 19 405-417
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
51. Nadeem, M. ; Bahadar, S. ; Gull, A.A. ; Iqbal, U. Are women ecofriendly? Board gender diversity and environmental innovation. 2020 Business Strategy and the Environment. 29 3146-3161
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
52. Nadeem, M. ; Zaman, R. ; Saleem, I. Boardroom gender diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence from Australian securities exchange listed firms. 2017 Journal of Cleaner Production. 149 874-885
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. O’Reilly, C.A. ; Caldwell, D. ; Barnett, W. Work group demography. Social integration, and turnover. 1989 Administrative Science Quarterly. 34 21-37
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

54. Orazalin, N. Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. 2020 Business Strategy and the Environment. 29 140-153

55. Peters, F. ; Romi, M. Does the voluntary adoption of corporate governance mechanisms improve environmental risk disclosures? Evidence from green-house gas emission accounting. 2014 Journal of Business Ethics. 125 637-666

56. Pfeffer, J. ; Salancik, G.R. A resource dependence perspective. 1978 En : Intercorporate relations. The structural analysis of business. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

57. Post, C. ; Rahman, N. ; Mcquillen, C. From board composition to corporate environmental performance through sustainability-themed alliances. 2015 Journal of Business Ethics. 130 423-435

58. Rodrigue, M. ; Magnan, M. ; Cho, C.H. Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An empirical investigation. 2013 Journal of Business Ethics. 114 107-129

59. Roodman, D. How to do xtabond2. 2006 En : North American Stata Users' Group meetings 2006. Stata Users Group:

60. Scholtens, B. A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. 2008 Ecological Economics. 68 46-55

61. Shahab, Y. ; Gull, A.A. ; Rind, A.A. ; Sarang, A.A.A. ; Ahsan, T. Do corporate governance mechanisms curb the anti-environmental behavior of firms worldwide? An illustration through waste management. 2022 Journal of Environmental Management. 310 -

62. Sharma, S. ; Henriques, I. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. 2005 Strategic Management Journal. 26 159-180

63. Spira, L.F. ; Bender, R. Compare and contrast: Perspectives on board committees. 2004 Corporate Governance: An International Review. 12 489-499

64. Suchman, M.C. ; Edelman, L.B. Legal rational myths: The new institutionalism and the law and society tradition. 1997 Law & Social Inquiry. 21 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

65. Tashman, P. ; Marano, V. ; Kostova, T. Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. 2019 Journal of International Business Studies. 50 153-171

66. The Economist, Corporate Social Responsibility: The Halo Effect. 2015 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
67. United Nations Environment Programme, Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal. 2014 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

68. Van den Berghe, L.A. ; Levrau, A. Evaluating boards of directors: What constitutes a good corporate board?. 2004 Corporate Governance: An International Review. 12 461-478

69. Walls, J.L. ; Berrone, P. ; Phan, P.H. Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link?. 2012 Strategic Management Journal. 33 885-913

70. Yermack, D. Higher market valuation of companies with a small Board of Directors. 1996 Journal of Financial Economics. 40 185-211

71. Zaman, R. ; Atawnah, N. ; Haseeb, M. ; Nadeem, M. ; Irfan, S. Does corporate eco-innovation affect stock price crash risk?. 2021 The British Accounting Review. 53 -

72. Zaman, R. ; Jain, T. ; Samara, G. ; Jamali, D. Corporate Governance Meets Corporate Social Responsibility: Mapping the Interface. 2020 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. The role of the institutional supply chain in the transition from the linear to the circular paradigm: The Italian case. (2025). Marchesano, Katia ; Monteleone, Simona ; Musella, Gaetano ; Agovino, Massimiliano ; Garofalo, Antonio.
   In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
   RePEc:eee:soceps:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s003801212500045x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Consumer intention to express packaging recycling in Chinas digital economy: an expansion of the theory of planned behavior. (2024). Li, Yuanqi ; Jie, DU ; Siddiqui, Faiza ; Wu, Qinqin.
   In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
   RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04549-x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Do green parties affect local waste management policies?. (2024). Fiorino, Nadia ; Cerqua, Augusto ; Galli, Emma.
   In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
   RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:128:y:2024:i:c:s009506962400130x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. The presence and composition of sustainability committee and waste management practices. (2024). GULL, Ammar ; Nadeem, Muhammad ; Atif, Muhammad ; Carvajal, Mariela.
   In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
   RePEc:eee:finana:v:93:y:2024:i:c:s1057521924000437.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Fighting crime to improve recycling: Evaluating an anti-mafia policy on source separation of waste. (2024). cantabene, claudia ; Baraldi, Anna Laura ; de Iudicibus, Alessandro.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:224:y:2024:i:c:s0921800924001885.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. The effects of regional goal setting on household waste. (2024). Takeuchi, Kenji ; Ishimura, Yuichi ; Shinkuma, Takayoshi ; Hosoda, Eiji.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:215:y:2024:i:c:s0921800923002781.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Fighting crime for improved recycling: evaluating an anti-mafia policy on source separation of waste.. (2023). cantabene, claudia ; Baraldi, Anna Laura ; de Iudicibus, Alessandro.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:120296.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Double-edged circularity: Comparative assessment of circular and non-circular consumers. (2023). Shi, Sha ; Cerchione, Roberto ; Centobelli, Piera ; Jhamb, Deepika.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:212:y:2023:i:c:s0921800923001945.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Changes in household recycling behavior: Evidence from panel data. (2023). Viscusi, W ; Huber, Joel ; Bell, Jason.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:208:y:2023:i:c:s0921800923000824.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Do corporate governance mechanisms curb the anti-environmental behavior of firms worldwide? An illustration through waste management. (2022). GULL, Ammar ; Alias, Aitzaz Ahsan ; Shahab, Yasir ; Ahsan, Tanveer ; Rind, Asad Ali.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03602986.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. The effects of the containers and packaging recycling law on the domestic recycling of plastic waste: Evidence from Japan. (2022). Ishimura, Yuichi.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:201:y:2022:i:c:s0921800922001975.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Socio-economic and political factors affecting the rate of recycling in Portuguese municipalities. (2022). Cerqueira, Pedro ; Soukiazis, Elias.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:108:y:2022:i:c:s0264999322000256.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Impact of Municipal Waste Recycling and Renewable Energy Consumption on CO 2 Emissions across the European Union (EU) Member Countries. (2021). Bayar, Yilmaz ; Sauer, Stefan ; Gavriletea, Marius Dan ; Paun, Dragos.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:656-:d:478788.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. I Am Better Than Others: Waste Management Policies and Self-Enhancement Bias. (2021). Zhao, Yihan ; Chen, Rong ; Liu, Pingping ; Yabe, Mitsuyasu ; Han, Buxin.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13257-:d:691666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Post-collection Separation of Plastic Waste: Better for the Environment and Lower Collection Costs?. (2020). Gradus, Raymond ; Dijkgraaf, Elbert.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:77:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-020-00457-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Analysis of the Influence Mechanism of Consumers’ Trading Behavior on Reusable Mobile Phones. (2020). Gong, YU ; Wu, Yufeng ; Gu, Yifan ; Zhao, Xinnan ; Yuan, Qingbin.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3921-:d:356519.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Assessing the determinants of performance in the recycling business: Evidence from the Italian context. (2019). Quaglia, Roberto ; Franceschelli, Maria Vittoria ; Santoro, Gabriele ; Giacosa, Elisa.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:5:p:1086-1099.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Do Sociodemographic Characteristics in Waste Management Matter? Case Study of Recyclable Generation in the Czech Republic. (2019). Rybova, Kristyna.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2030-:d:220257.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Consumers in a Circular Economy: Economic Analysis of Household Waste Sorting Behaviour. (2019). Smed, Sinne ; Termansen, Mette ; Zemo, Kahsay Haile ; Nainggolan, Doan ; Hasler, Berit ; Pedersen, Anders Branth.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:166:y:2019:i:c:9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Recycling and Waste Generation: An Estimate of the Source Reduction Effect of Recycling Programs. (2019). Vittucci Marzetti, Giuseppe ; Degli Antoni, Giacomo.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:161:y:2019:i:c:p:321-329.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. It Wasnt Me! Visibility and Free Riding in Waste Disposal. (2019). Piovesan, Marco ; Montinari, Natalia ; Bucciol, Alessandro.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:157:y:2019:i:c:p:394-401.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. The regional heterogeneity of household recycling: a spatial-econometric analysis of Swedish plastic packing waste. (2018). Söderholm, Patrik ; Soderholm, Patrik ; Hage, Olle ; Sandberg, Krister ; Berglund, Christer.
    In: Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences.
    RePEc:spr:lsprsc:v:11:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s12076-017-0200-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. An Exploration of the Impacts of Compulsory Source-Separated Policy in Improving Household Solid Waste-Sorting in Pilot Megacities, China: A Case Study of Nanjing. (2018). Yang, Yongjun ; Li, Xiaoxiao ; Ma, Jing ; Liu, Gang-Jun ; Chen, FU.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1327-:d:143127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Econometric Model for Measuring the Impact of the Education Level of the Population on the Recycling Rate in a Circular Economy. (2018). Pelau, Corina ; Chinie, Alexandra Catalina.
    In: The Audit Financiar journal.
    RePEc:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:48:p:340.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Econometric Model for Measuring the Impact of the Education Level of the Population on the Recycling Rate in a Circular Economy. (2018). Pelau, Corina ; Chinie, Alexandra Catalina.
    In: The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal.
    RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:20:y:2018:i:48:p:340.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. An EU Recycling Target: What Does the Dutch Evidence Tell Us?. (2017). Gradus, Raymond ; Dijkgraaf, Elbert.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:68:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-016-0027-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Patterns in municipal food scrap programming in mid-sized U.S. cities. (2017). Pollans, Lily Baum ; Krones, Jonathan S ; Ben-Joseph, Eran.
    In: Resources, Conservation & Recycling.
    RePEc:eee:recore:v:125:y:2017:i:c:p:308-314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Distance and incentives matter: The separation of recyclable municipal waste. (2017). Struk, Michal.
    In: Resources, Conservation & Recycling.
    RePEc:eee:recore:v:122:y:2017:i:c:p:155-162.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Household informedness and policy analytics for the collection and recycling of household hazardous waste in California. (2017). Kauffman, Robert J ; Lim-Wavde, Kustini ; Dawson, Gregory S.
    In: Resources, Conservation & Recycling.
    RePEc:eee:recore:v:120:y:2017:i:c:p:88-107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. The Displacement Effect of Convenience: The Case of Recycling. (2017). O'Shea, Lucy ; Nandeibam, Shasikanta ; Abbott, Andrew.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:136:y:2017:i:c:p:159-168.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. A Cost-effectiveness Analysis for Incineration or Recycling of Dutch Household Plastic Waste. (2017). Gradus, Raymond ; Dijkgraaf, Elbert ; van Koppen, Rick J.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:135:y:2017:i:c:p:22-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Household Waste Recycling: Economics and Policy. (2016). Kirakozian, Ankinée.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2015-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Impact of local and national social norm information on respondents’ choices regarding waste sorting at household level. (2016). Zagórska, Katarzyna.
    In: Ekonomia journal.
    RePEc:eko:ekoeko:44_121.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. A proposed structural model for housewives recycling behavior: A case study from Turkey. (2016). Yilmaz, Veysel ; Ari, Erkan.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:129:y:2016:i:c:p:132-142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER? BEHAVIOURAL AND INCENTIVE POLICIES FOR HOUSEHOLD WASTE MANAGEMENT. (2016). Kirakozian, Ankinée ; Zheng, Siqi ; Lin, Brian Chi-Ang.
    In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
    RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:30:y:2016:i:3:p:526-551.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. HOUSEHOLD COOPERATION IN WASTE MANAGEMENT: INITIAL CONDITIONS AND INTERVENTION. (2016). Briguglio, Marie ; Zheng, Siqi ; Lin, Brian Chi-Ang.
    In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
    RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:30:y:2016:i:3:p:497-525.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. The creation of interactive activity pods at a Recycling Education Centre. (2015). .
    In: Local Economy.
    RePEc:sae:loceco:v:30:y:2015:i:3:p:370-381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Waste and organized crime in regional environments. (2015). Nicolli, Francesco ; Mazzanti, Massimiliano ; D'Amato, Alessio ; Damato, Alessio.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:41:y:2015:i:c:p:185-201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Strategies for local authorities to achieve the EU 2020 50% recycling, reuse and composting target: A case study of England. (2015). Tudor, Terry ; Waite, Steve ; Cox, Paul.
    In: Resources, Conservation & Recycling.
    RePEc:eee:recore:v:105:y:2015:i:pa:p:18-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. The Effectiveness of Dutch Municipal Recycling Policies. (2014). Gradus, Raymond ; Dijkgraaf, Elbert.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20140155.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Recycling: Social norms and warm-glow revisited. (2013). O'Shea, Lucy ; Nandeibam, Shasikanta ; Abbott, Andrew.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:90:y:2013:i:c:p:10-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Estimating Consumer Willingness to Supply and Willingness to Pay for Curbside Recycling. (2012). Troske, Kenneth ; Koford, Brandon ; Blomquist, Glenn ; Hardesty, David M..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:88:y:2012:iv:1:p:745-763.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Does the NIMBY strategy really promote a self-interest?: Evidence from Englands waste management policy. (2012). Yoshida, Yuichiro ; Yamamoto, Masashi.
    In: GRIPS Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ngi:dpaper:12-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Waste Sustainability, Environmental Management and Mafia: Analysing Geographical and Economic Dimensions. (2011). Nicolli, Francesco ; Mazzanti, Massimiliano ; D'Amato, Alessio.
    In: CEIS Research Paper.
    RePEc:rtv:ceisrp:213.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 06:41:01 || Missing content? Let us know