1. Public preferences for the allocation of societal resources over different healthcare purposes. (2024). van Exel, Job ; Boxebeld, Sander ; Mouter, Niek ; van Agthoven, Michel ; Maes, Laurence ; Tuit, Charlotte ; Makady, Amr ; Geijsen, Tom.
   In: Social Science & Medicine.
   RePEc:eee:socmed:v:341:y:2024:i:c:s0277953623008936.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Bae, E.-Y. ; Go, M. ; Bae, G. ; Lee, B.R. ; Lim, M. Exploring priority setting criteria for limited health care resources. 2019 J Korean Acad Soc Manag Care Pharmacy. 7 60-66
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Bae, E.Y. ; Kim, H.J. ; Lee, H.J. ; Jang, J. ; Lee, S.M. ; Jung, Y. Role of economic evidence in coverage decision-making in South Korea. 2018 PLoS ONE. 13 -

3. Bae, E.Y. ; Lim, M.K. ; Lee, B. ; Bae, G. Who should be given priority for public funding?. 2020 Health Policy (New York). 124 1108-1114

4. Bae, G. ; Lee, B.R. ; Lim, M. ; Bae, E.-Y. A focus group study to identify the factors influencing priority setting in healthcare: focusing on age, severity, and social solidarity. 2022 Korean J Health Econ Policy. 28 25-42
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Baker, R. ; Bateman, I. ; Donaldson, C. ; Jones-Lee, M. ; Lancsar, E. ; Loomes, G. Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project. 2010 Health Technol Assess. 14 1-162

6. Chalkidou, K. Evidence and values: paying for end-of-life drugs in the British NHS. 2012 Health Econ Policy Law. 7 393-409

7. Gyrd-Hansen, D. Is there additional value attached to health gains at the end of life? A revisit. 2018 Health Econ. 27 e71-e75

8. Hansen, L.D. ; Kjær, T. Disentangling public preferences for health gains at end-of-life: further evidence of no support of an end-of-life premium. 2019 Soc Sci Med. 236 -

9. Kuhfeld, W.F. Marketing research methods in SAS. 2010 SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, North Carolina
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Kwon, S.H. ; Park, S.K. ; Byun, J.H. ; Lee, E.K. Eliciting societal preferences of reimbursement decision criteria for anti cancer drugs in South Korea. 2017 Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 17 411-419
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Lakdawalla, D.N. ; Doshi, J.A. ; Garrison, L.P. ; Phelps, C.E. ; Basu, A. ; Danzon, P.M Defining elements of value in health care-A health economics approach: an ISPOR special task force report [3]. 2018 Value Health. 21 131-139
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Lancsar, E. ; Gu, Y. ; Gyrd-Hansen, D. ; Butler, J. ; Ratcliffe, J. ; Bulfone, L. The relative value of different QALY types. 2020 J Health Econ. 70 -

13. Lancsar, E. ; Louviere, J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide. 2008 Pharmacoeconomics. 26 661-677

14. Lancsar, E. ; Louviere, J. Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?. 2006 Health Econ. 15 797-811

15. Lee, B. ; Bae, G. ; Lim, M.K. ; Bae, E.-Y. A systematic review of priority setting in healthcare resource allocation. 2019 Korean J Health Econ Policy. 25 57-91
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Lim, M.K. ; Bae, E.Y. ; Choi, S.E. ; Lee, E.K. ; Lee, T.J. Eliciting public preference for health-care resource allocation in South Korea. 2012 Value Health. 15 S91-S94
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Linley, W.G. ; Hughes, D.A. Societal views on NICE, cancer drugs fund and value-based pricing criteria for prioritising medicines: a cross-sectional survey of 4118 adults in Great Britain. 2013 Health Econ. 22 948-964

18. McFadden, D. Rationality for economists?. 1999 J Risk Uncertain. 19 73-105

19. McHugh, N. ; Pinto-Prades, J.L. ; Baker, R. ; Mason, H. ; Donaldson, C. Exploring the relative value of end of life QALYs: are the comparators important?. 2020 Soc Sci Med. 245 -

20. McHugh, N. ; van Exel, J. ; Mason, H. ; Godwin, J. ; Collins, M. ; Donaldson, C. Are life-extending treatments for terminal illnesses a special case? Exploring choices and societal viewpoints. 2018 Soc Sci Med. 198 61-69

21. Miguel, F.S. ; Ryan, M. ; Amaya-Amaya, M. Irrational' stated preferences: a quantitative and qualitative investigation. 2005 Health Econ. 14 307-322

22. Morrell, L. ; Buchanan, J. ; Rees, S. ; Barker, R.W. ; Wordsworth, S What aspects of illness influence public preferences for healthcare priority setting? A discrete choice experiment in the UK. 2021 Pharmacoeconomics. 39 1443-1454

23. Mulhern, B. ; Longworth, L. ; Brazier, J. ; Rowen, D. ; Bansback, N. ; Devlin, N. Binary choice health state valuation and mode of administration: head-to-head comparison of online and CAPI. 2013 Value Health. 16 104-113
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. National Institue for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) NICE health technology evaluations: the manual. 2022 NICE: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Appraising life-extending, end of life treatments. 2009 NICE: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Nicolet, A. ; van Asselt, A.D.I. ; Vermeulen, K.M. ; Krabbe, P.F.M. Value judgment of new medical treatments: societal and patient perspectives to inform priority setting in the Netherlands. 2020 PLoS ONE. 15 -

27. Nord, E. The trade-off between severity of illness and treatment effect in cost-value analysis of health care. 1993 Health Policy. 24 227-238

28. Nord, E. ; Johansen, R. Concerns for severity in priority setting in health care: a review of trade-off data in preference studies and implications for societal willingness to pay for a QALY. 2014 Health Policy. 116 281-288

29. Olsen, J.A. Priority preferences: "end of life" does not matter, but total life does. 2013 Value Health. 16 1063-1066
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Paolucci, F. ; Mentzakis, E. ; Defechereux, T. ; Niessen, L.W. Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China–a stated preference analysis. 2015 Health Policy Plan. 30 1059-1066
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Pearce, A.M. ; Mulhern, B.J. ; Watson, V. ; Viney, R.C. How are debriefing questions used in health discrete choice experiments? An online survey. 2020 Value Health. 23 289-293
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Pennington, M. ; Baker, R. ; Brouwer, W. ; Mason, H. ; Hansen, D.G. ; Robinson, A. Comparing WTP values of different types of QALY gain elicited from the general public. 2015 Health Econ. 24 280-293

33. Pinto-Prades, J.L. ; Sánchez-Martínez, F.I. ; Corbacho, B. ; Baker, R Valuing QALYs at the end of life. 2014 Soc Sci Med. 113 5-14

34. Reed, S.D. ; Yang, J.C. ; Gonzalez, J.M. ; Johnson, F.R. Quantifying value of hope. 2021 Value Health. 24 1511-1519
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

35. Rowen, D. ; Brazier, J. ; Keetharuth, A. ; Tsuchiya, A. ; Mukuria, C. Comparison of modes of administration and alternative formats for eliciting societal preferences for burden of illness. 2016 Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 14 89-104

36. Rowen, D. ; Brazier, J. ; Mukuria, C. ; Keetharuth, A. ; Risa Hole, A. ; Tsuchiya, A. Eliciting societal preferences for weighting QALYs for burden of illness and end of life. 2016 Med Decis Making. 36 210-222

37. Ryan, M. ; Watson, V. ; Entwistle, V. Rationalising the 'irrational': a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses. 2009 Health Econ. 18 321-336

38. Shah, K. Valuing health at the end of life. 2017 Great Britain: University of Sheffield:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

39. Shah, K.K. Severity of illness and priority setting in healthcare: a review of the literature. 2009 Health Policy (New York). 93 77-84

40. Shah, K.K. ; Tsuchiya, A. ; Wailoo, A.J. Valuing health at the end of life: a review of stated preference studies in the social sciences literature. 2018 Soc Sci Med. 204 39-50

41. Shah, K.K. ; Tsuchiya, A. ; Wailoo, A.J. Valuing health at the end of life: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. 2015 Soc Sci Med. 124 48-56

42. Shah, K.K. ; Tsuchiya, A. ; Wailoo, A.J. Valuing health at the end of life: an empirical study of public preferences. 2014 Eur J Health Econ. 15 389-399

43. Shiroiwa, T. ; Igarashi, A. ; Fukuda, T. ; Ikeda, S. WTP for a QALY and health states: more money for severer health states?. 2013 Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 11 22-
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Shiroiwa, T. ; Saito, S. ; Shimozuma, K. ; Kodama, S. ; Noto, S. ; Fukuda, T. Societal preferences for Interventions with the same efficiency: assessment and application to decision making. 2016 Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 14 375-385

45. Skedgel, C. ; Wailoo, A. ; Akehurst, R. Societal preferences for distributive justice in the allocation of health care resources: a latent class discrete choice experiment. 2015 Med Decis Making. 35 94-105

46. Soekhai, V. ; de Bekker-Grob, E.W. ; Ellis, A.R. ; Vass, C.M. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: past, present and future. 2019 Pharmacoeconomics. 37 201-226

47. Tervonen, T. ; Schmidt-Ott, T. ; Marsh, K. ; Bridges, J.F.P. ; Quaife, M. ; Janssen, E. Assessing rationality in discrete choice experiments in health: an investigation into the use of dominance tests. 2018 Value Health. 21 1192-1197
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Torbica, A. ; Fornaro, G. ; Tarricone, R. ; Drummond, M.F. Do social values and institutional context shape the use of economic evaluation in reimbursement decisions? An empirical analysis. 2020 Value Health. 23 17-24
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

49. Tsuchiya, A. ; Watson, V. Re-thinking 'the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health. 2017 Health Econ. 26 e103-e107

50. van de Wetering, E.J. ; van Exel, N.J. ; Rose, J.M. ; Hoefman, R.J. ; Brouwer, W.B. Are some QALYs more equal than others?. 2016 Eur J Health Econ. 17 117-127

51. van de Wetering, L. ; van Exel, J. ; Bobinac, A. ; Brouwer, W.B. Valuing QALYs in relation to equity considerations using a discrete choice experiment. 2015 Pharmacoeconomics. 33 1289-1300

52. Williams, A. Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the 'fair innings' argument. 1997 Health Econ. 6 117-132

53. Wouters, S. ; van Exel, J. ; Baker, R. ; Brouwer, W.B.F. Priority to end of life treatments? Views of the public in the Netherlands. 2017 Value Health. 20 107-117
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Views and opinions of the general public about the reimbursement of expensive medicines in the Netherlands. (2025). van der Wal, Roosmarijn ; van der Pol, Ludo W ; Zomers, Margot L.
   In: PLOS ONE.
   RePEc:plo:pone00:0317188.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Identifying health inequities faced by older adults with rare diseases: A systematic literature review and proposal for an ethical spectrum and resource allocation framework. (2024). Blankart, Carl ; Uwitonze, Jean Pierre ; Duminy, Lize.
   In: Health Policy.
   RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:149:y:2024:i:c:s0168851024001866.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Lessons learned from the Canadian Fabry Disease Initiative for future risk-sharing and managed access agreements for pharmaceutical and advanced therapies in Canada. (2024). Grunebaum, Shir.
   In: Health Policy.
   RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:143:y:2024:i:c:s016885102400054x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Public preferences in healthcare resource allocation: A discrete choice experiment in South Korea. (2023). Lim, Min Kyoung ; Hong, Jihyung ; Bae, Green ; Lee, Boram.
   In: Health Policy.
   RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:138:y:2023:i:c:s0168851023002178.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: a systematic review with meta-regression. (2022). Poder, Thomas G.
   In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
   RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:23:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10198-021-01364-3.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. The relative value of carer and patient quality of life: A person trade-off (PTO) study. (2022). Brouwer, Werner ; Al-Janabi, Hareth ; Wittenberg, Eve ; Donaldson, Cam.
   In: Social Science & Medicine.
   RePEc:eee:socmed:v:292:y:2022:i:c:s0277953621008881.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Eliciting a monetary threshold for a year of sufficient capability to inform resource allocation decisions in public health and social care. (2021). Kinghorn, Philip ; Afentou, Nafsika.
   In: Social Science & Medicine.
   RePEc:eee:socmed:v:279:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621003099.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Estimating the monetary value of health and capability well-being applying the well-being valuation approach. (2020). Brouwer, Werner ; Himmler, Sebastian ; Exel, Job.
   In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
   RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:21:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1007_s10198-020-01231-7.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. How averse are the UK general public to inequalities in health between socioeconomic groups? A systematic review. (2020). Tsuchiya, Aki ; McNamara, Simon ; Holmes, John ; Stevely, Abigail K.
   In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
   RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:21:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10198-019-01126-2.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. The relative value of different QALY types. (2020). Lancsar, Emily ; Gu, Yuanyuan ; Bulfone, Liliana ; Ratcliffe, Julie ; Butler, Jim ; Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte ; Donaldson, Cam.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:70:y:2020:i:c:s0167629618309573.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Value of a QALY and VSI estimated with the chained approach. (2019). Hultkrantz, Lars ; Gerdtham, Ulf-G. ; Persson, U ; U.-G. Gerdtham, ; Olofsson, S.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:20:y:2019:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-019-01077-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Disentangling public preferences for health gains at end-of-life: Further evidence of no support of an end-of-life premium. (2019). Kjar, Trine ; Hansen, Lise Desiree.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:236:y:2019:i:c:3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Valuing health at the end of life: A review of stated preference studies in the social sciences literature. (2018). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Shah, Koonal ; Wailoo, Allan J.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:204:y:2018:i:c:p:39-50.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments. (2017). Vass, Caroline ; Payne, Katherine ; Rigby, Dan.
    In: Medical Decision Making.
    RePEc:sae:medema:v:37:y:2017:i:3:p:298-313.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Value of a QALY and VSI Estimated with the Chained Approach. (2016). Hultkrantz, Lars ; Gerdtham, Ulf-G. ; Persson, Ulf ; Olofsson, Sara.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2016_033.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. From representing views to representativeness of views: Illustrating a new (Q2S) approach in the context of health care priority setting in nine European countries. (2016). van Exel, Job ; Brouwer, Werner ; Baker, Rachel ; Mason, Helen ; Donaldson, Cam.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:166:y:2016:i:c:p:205-213.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. The Willingness to Pay for a Quality Adjusted Life Year: A Review of the Empirical Literature. (2015). Svensson, Mikael ; Ryen, Linda.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:24:y:2015:i:10:p:1289-1301.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. The Willingness to Pay for a QALY: a Review of the Empirical Literature. (2014). Svensson, Mikael ; Ryen, Linda.
    In: Karlstad University Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:kaunek:0012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Contingent Valuation in Health Care. (2012). Shackley, Phil ; Mason, Helen ; Donaldson, Cam.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:14021_40.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 12:29:19 || Missing content? Let us know