Abadie, A. ; Imbens, G. Simple and bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. 2002 :
- Abduh, A.J. A critical analysis of the world's top 2% most influential scientists: Examining the limitations and biases of highly cited researchers lists. 2023 Authorea Preprints. -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Abramo, G. ; D'Angelo, C.A. ; Di Costa, F. A gender analysis of top scientists' collaboration behavior: Evidence from Italy. 2019 Scientometrics. 120 405-418
Abramo, G. ; D'angelo, C.A. ; Di Costa, F. The collaboration behavior of top scientists. 2019 Scientometrics. 118 215-232
Abramo, G. ; D'Angelo, C.A. ; Soldatenkova, A. The dispersion of the citation distribution of top scientists' publications. 2016 Scientometrics. 109 1711-1724
Adams, J.D. ; Black, G.C. ; Clemmons, J.R. ; Stephan, P.E. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from us universities, 1981–1999. 2005 Research Policy. 34 259-285
AlShebli, B.K. ; Rahwan, T. ; Woon, W.L. The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration. 2018 Nature Communications. 9 5163-
- Amelink, C.T. ; Wade, C.S. ; Watford, B.A. ; Cuadrado-Medina, J.A. ; Folgar-Lopez, J.C. ; Lewis, S.N. Measuring innovative thinking skills in innovation challenge activities. 2014 En : 2014 ASEE annual conference & exposition. :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Amjad, T. ; Ding, Y. ; Xu, J. ; Zhang, C. ; Daud, A. ; Tang, J. ; Song, M. Standing on the shoulders of giants. 2017 Journal of Informetrics. 11 307-323
Arts, S. ; Hou, J. ; Gomez, J.C. Natural language processing to identify the creation and impact of new technologies in patent text: Code, data, and new measures. 2021 Research Policy. 50 -
- Bittmann, F. ; Tekles, A. ; Bornmann, L. Applied usage and performance of statistical matching in bibliometrics: The comparison of milestone and regular papers with multiple measurements of disruptiveness as an empirical example. 2021 Quantitative Science Studies. 2 1246-1270
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Blackwell, A.F. ; Wilson, L. ; Boulton, C. ; Knell, J. Radical innovation: Crossing knowledge boundaries with interdisciplinary teams. 2009 University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory:
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bonacich, P. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. 1972 The Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 2 113-120
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bornmann, L. ; Haunschild, R. ; Mutz, R. Should citations be field-normalized in evaluative bibliometrics? An empirical analysis based on propensity score matching. 2020 Journal of Informetrics. 14 -
- Boyack, K.W. ; Klavans, R. Predicting the importance of current papers. 2005 En : Proceedings of ISSI, Stockholm Sweden. :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
D'este, P. ; Llopis, O. ; Rentocchini, F. ; Yegros, A. The relationship between interdisciplinarity and distinct modes of university-industry interaction. 2019 Research Policy. 48 -
Dahlin, K.B. ; Behrens, D.M. When is an invention really radical?: Defining and measuring technological radicalness. 2005 Research Policy. 34 717-737
- Dong, X. ; Zhang, L. ; Sun, D. ; Sun, X. Experimental and model investigations of sps casing treatment on a two-stage compressor. 2021 Propulsion and Power Research. 10 1-14
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Érdi, P. ; Makovi, K. ; Somogyvári, Z. ; Strandburg, K. ; Tobochnik, J. ; Volf, P. ; Zalányi, L. Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the us patent citation network. 2013 Scientometrics. 95 225-242
Fan, L. ; Guo, L. ; Wang, X. ; Xu, L. ; Liu, F. Does the author's collaboration mode lead to papers' different citation impacts? An empirical analysis based on propensity score matching. 2022 Journal of Informetrics. 16 -
- Jones, A.W. Who are the most highly cited forensic scientists in the United States?. 2023 Journal of Forensic Sciences. 68 723-730
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kim, S. ; Park, K.C. Government funded r&d collaboration and it's impact on sme's business performance. 2021 Journal of Informetrics. 15 -
- Lee, P.C. ; Su, H.N. ; Wu, F.S. Quantitative mapping of patented technology—the case of electrical conducting polymer nanocomposite. 2010 Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 77 466-478
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lee, Y.N. ; Walsh, J.P. ; Wang, J. Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact. 2015 Research Policy. 44 684-697
Leydesdorff, L. Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. 2007 Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58 1303-1319
Leydesdorff, L. ; Rafols, I. Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations. 2011 Journal of Informetrics. 5 87-100
- Li, M. Using the propensity score method to estimate causal effects: A review and practical guide. 2013 Organizational Research Methods. 16 188-226
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Li, W. ; Aste, T. ; Caccioli, F. ; Livan, G. Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers. 2019 Nature Communications. 10 5170-
Lin, Y. ; Frey, C.B. ; Wu, L. Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas. 2023 Nature. 623 987-991
Liu, Q. ; Guo, L. ; Sun, Y. ; Ren, L. ; Wang, X. ; Han, X. Do scholars' collaborative tendencies impact the quality of their publications? A generalized propensity score matching analysis. 2024 Journal of Informetrics. 18 -
- Meng, L. ; Huang, R. ; Gu, J. A review of semantic similarity measures in wordnet. 2013 International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology. 6 1-12
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mirnezami, S.R. ; Beaudry, C. ; Tahmooresnejad, L. The effect of collaboration with top-funded scholars on scientific production. 2020 Science & Public Policy. 47 219-234
Moed, H.F. The impact-factors debate: The isi's uses and limits. 2002 Nature. 415 731-732
Mutz, R. ; Wolbring, T. ; Daniel, H.D. The effect of the “very important paper”(vip) designation in angewandte chemie international edition on citation impact: A propensity score matching analysis. 2017 The Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68 2139-2153
Park, M. ; Leahey, E. ; Funk, R.J. Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. 2023 Nature. 613 138-144
Qi, M. ; Zeng, A. ; Li, M. ; Fan, Y. ; Di, Z. Standing on the shoulders of giants: The effect of outstanding scientists on young collaborators' careers. 2017 Scientometrics. 111 1839-1850
Rishika, R. ; Kumar, A. ; Janakiraman, R. ; Bezawada, R. The effect of customers' social media participation on customer visit frequency and profitability: An empirical investigation. 2013 Information Systems Research. 24 108-127
- Rosenbaum, P.R. Choice as an alternative to control in observational studies. 1999 Statistical Science. 14 259-304
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rosenbaum, P.R. ; Rosenbaum, P. ; Briskman, Design of observational studies, Vol. 10. 2010 Springer:
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rosenbaum, P.R. ; Rosenbaum, P.R. Overt bias in observational studies. 2002 Springer:
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rosenbaum, P.R. ; Rubin, D.B. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. 1985 American Statistician. 39 33-38
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rosenbaum, P.R. ; Rubin, D.B. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. 1984 Journal of the American Statistical Association. 79 516-524
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rosenbaum, P.R. ; Rubin, D.B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. 1983 Biometrika. 70 41-55
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Savov, P. Measuring the novelty of scientific papers. 2021 :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sekara, V. ; Deville, P. ; Ahnert, S.E. ; Barabási, A.L. ; Sinatra, R. ; Lehmann, S. The chaperone effect in scientific publishing. 2018 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 12603-12607
- Shin, H. ; Kim, K. ; Kogler, D.F. Scientific collaboration, research funding, and novelty in scientific knowledge. 2022 PLoS ONE. 17 -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Steiner, P.M. ; Cook, T.D. ; Shadish, W.R. ; Clark, M.H. The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies. 2010 Psychological Methods. 15 250-
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tahamtan, I. ; Bornmann, L. Creativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references?. 2018 Journal of Informetrics. 12 906-930
Trapido, D. How novelty in knowledge earns recognition: The role of consistent identities. 2015 Research Policy. 44 1488-1500
Uddin, S. ; Khan, A. The impact of author-selected keywords on citation counts. 2016 Journal of Informetrics. 10 1166-1177
Waltman, L. ; Van Eck, N.J. The inconsistency of the h-index. 2012 Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63 406-415
Wang, J. ; Veugelers, R. ; Stephan, P. Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators. 2017 Research Policy. 46 1416-1436
Way, S.F. ; Morgan, A.C. ; Larremore, D.B. ; Clauset, A. Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment. 2019 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116 10729-10733
Xie, Q. ; Zhang, X. ; Kim, G. ; Song, M. Exploring the influence of coauthorship with top scientists on researchers' affiliation, research topic, productivity, and impact. 2022 Journal of Informetrics. 16 -
Zeng, A. ; Fan, Y. ; Di, Z. ; Wang, Y. ; Havlin, S. Impactful scientists have higher tendency to involve collaborators in new topics. 2022 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 -
- Zhang, Y. ; Tsai, F.S. Chinese novelty mining. 2009 En : Proceedings of the 2009 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Zong, Q. ; Xie, Y. ; Liang, J. Does open peer review improve citation count? Evidence from a propensity score matching analysis of peerj. 2020 Scientometrics. 125 607-623