create a website

On the Stochasticity of Ultimatum Games. (2022). Vriend, Nicolaas ; Qi, Tianxiao ; Wu, Jinshan ; Xu, Bin.
In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:202:y:2022:i:c:p:227-254.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 56

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

    References contributed by pwa594-3905710

  1. Agranov, M., Healy, P.J., Nielsen, K., 2020. Stable randomization. Mimeo. Andersen, S., Harrison, G.W., Lau, M.I., Rutström, E.E., 2006. Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experimental Economics 9, 383–405.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Arad, A., Rubinstein, A., 2012. The 11-20 money request game: A level-k reasoning study. American Economic Review 102 (7), 3561–3573.

  3. Battalio, R.C., Kagel, J.H., Jiranyakul, K., 1990. Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3 (1), 25–50.

  4. Berninghaus, S., Todorova, L., Vogt, B., 2015. A simple questionnaire can change everything: Are strategy choices in the coordination and ultimatum games stable? In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom together with DataCom 2015 and SC2 2015, pp. 452–456.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bosch-Rosa, C., Meissner, T., Bosch-Domènech, A., 2018. Cognitive bubbles. Experimental Economics 21 (1), 132–153.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Brenner, T., Vriend, N.J., 2006. On the behavior of proposers in ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 61 (4), 617–631.

  7. Camerer, C., 2003. Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Candelo, N., Eckel, C., Johnson, C., 2019. The proposer’s behavior in the ultimatum game in 11 Mexican villages. Economics Letters 177, 5–8.

  9. Carpenter, J.P., Burks, S., Verhoogen, E., 2005. Comparing students to workers: The effects of social framing on behavior in distribution games. In: Carpenter, J., Harrison, G., List, J. (Eds.), Field Experiments in Economics, Research in Experimental Economics, Volume 10. JAI/Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston, pp. 261–290.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Chakravarty, S., Harrison, G.W., Haruvy, E.E., Rutström, E.E., 2011. Are you risk averse over other people’s money? Southern Economic Journal 77, 901–913.

  11. Charness, G., Garcia, T., Offerman, T., Villeval, M.C., 2020. Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 60, 99–123.

  12. Charness, G., Gneezy, U., 2012. Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 83 (1), 50–58.

  13. Chen, D.L., Schonger, M., Wickens, C., 2016. oTree - an open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 9, 88–97.

  14. Chuah, S., Hoffmann, R., Jones, M., Williams, G., 2007. Do cultures clash? Evidence from cross-national ultimatum game experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 64, 35–48.

  15. Cooper, D.J., Feltovich, N., Roth, A.E., Zwick, R., 2003. Relative versus absolute speed of adjustment in strategic environments: Responder behavior in ultimatum games. Experimental Economics 6, 181–207.

  16. Cooper, D.J., Kagel, J.H., 2016. Other regarding preferences: A selective survey of experimental results. In: Kagel, J.H., Roth, A.E. (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Volume 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 217–289.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Cox, J.C., Sadiraj, V., 2006. Small- and large-stakes risk aversion: Implications of concavity calibration for decision theory. Games and Economic Behavior 56 (Issue 1), 45–60.

  18. Cueva, C., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Mata-Pérez, E., Ponti, G., Sartarelli, M., Yu, H., Zhukova, V., 2016. Cognitive (ir)reflection: New experimental evidence. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 64, 81–93.

  19. Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J., 2001. Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry 39 (2), 171–188.

  20. Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J., 2002. Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes towards financial risks. Evolution and Human Behavior 23, 281–295.

  21. Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J., 2008. Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. In: Plott, C., Smith, V. (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Volume 1. New York: Elsevier, pp. 1061–1073.

  22. Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J.L., Savin, N.E., Sefton, M., 1994. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior 6 (3), 347–369.

  23. Frontiers in psychology 10, 1548.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Gal, I., Baron, J., 1996. Understanding repeated simple choices. Thinking & Reasoning 2 (1), 81–98.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Gale, J., Binmore, K., Samuelson, L., 1995. Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game. Games and Economic Behavior 8, 56–90.

  26. Garcia-Gallego, A., Georgantzis, N., Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, A., 2012. Gender differences in ultimatum games: Despite rather than due to risk attitudes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 83, 42–49.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Gneezy, U., Potters, J., 1997. An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2), 631–645.

  28. Goodnow, J.J., 1955. Response sequences in a pair of two-choice probability situations. American Journal of Psychology 68, 624–630.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Güth, W., Kocher, M.G., 2014. More than thirty years of ultimatum bargaining experiments: Motives, variations, and a survey of the recent literature. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 108, 396–409.

  30. Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B., 1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3, 367–388.

  31. Harrison, G.W., Lau, M.I., Rutström, E.E., 2007. Estimating risk attitudes in Denmark: A field experiment. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 109, 341–368.

  32. Henrich, J., 2000. Does culture matter in economic behavior? Ultimatum game bargaining among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. American Economic Review 90 (4), 973–979.

  33. Hey, J.D., 2014. Choice under uncertainty: Empirical methods and experimental results. In: Machina, M.J., Viscusi, W.K. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, Volume 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 809–850.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Holt, C.A., Laury, S.K., 2002. Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review 92 (5), 1644–1655.

  35. Holt, C.A., Laury, S.K., 2014. Assessment and estimation of risk preferences. In: Machina, M.J., Viscusi, W.K. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, Volume 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 135–201.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (2), 263–291.

  37. Kim, D. G., Kim, H. C., 2021. Probability matching and strategic decision making. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Koehler, D.J., James, G., 2010. Probability matching and strategy availability. Memory & Cognition 38 (6), 667–676.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Li, S., Qin, X., Houser, D., 2018. Revisiting gender differences in ultimatum bargaining: experimental evidence from the us and china. Journal of the Economic Science Association 4, 180–190.

  40. Machina, M.J., Viscusi, W.K. (Eds.), 2014. Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, Volume 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Neimark, E.D., Shuford, E.H., 1959. Comparison of predictions and estimates in a probability learning situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (5), 294–298.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Noussair, C.N., Trautmann, S.T., van de Kuilen, G., 2014. Higher order risk attitudes, demographics, and financial decisions. Review of Economic Studies 81, 325–355.

  43. Oechssler, J., Roider, A., Schmitz, P.W., 2009. Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 72, 147–152.

  44. Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., van de Kuilen, G., 2004. Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics 7, 171–188.

  45. Rabin, M., Weizsäcker, G., 2009. Narrow bracketing and dominated choices. American Economic Review 99 (4), 1508–1543.

  46. Reani, M., Davies, A., Peek, N., Jay, C., 2019. Evidencing how experience and problem format affect probabilistic reasoning through interaction analysis.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Rubinstein, A., 2002. Irrational diversification in multiple decision problems. European Economic Review 46 (8), 1369–1378.

  48. Rubinstein, A., 2006. Dilemmas of an economic theorist. Econometrica 74 (4), 865–883.

  49. Shanks, D.R., Tunney, R.J., McCarthy, J.D., 2002. A re-examination of probability matching and rational choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15 (3), 233–250.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Solnick, S.J., 2001. Gender differences in the ultimatum game. Economic Inquiry 39 (2), 189–200.

  51. T. Qi et al. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 202 (2022) 227–254 Grant, D.A., Hake, H.W., Hornseth, J.P., 1951. Acquisition and extinction of a verbal conditioned response with differing percentages of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (1), 1–5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Thaler, R.H., 1988. The ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, 195–206.

  53. Thaler, R.H., 2016. Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future. American Economic Review 106 (7), 1577–1600.

  54. Trautmann, S.T., van de Kuilen, G., 2015. Ambiguity attitudes. In: Keren, G., Wu, G. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Blackwell, pp. 89–116.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Vulkan, N., 2000. An economist’s perspective on probability matching. Journal of economic surveys 14 (1), 101–118.

  56. West, R.F., Stanovich, K.E., 2003. Is probability matching smart? Associations between probabilistic choices and cognitive ability. Memory & Cognition 31 (2), 243–251.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. On the Stochasticity of Ultimatum Games. (2022). Vriend, Nicolaas ; Qi, Tianxiao ; Wu, Jinshan ; Xu, Bin.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:202:y:2022:i:c:p:227-254.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Cognitive sophistication and deliberation times. (2019). Buckenmaier, Johannes ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Lucky Numbers in Simple Games. (2019). Wolff, Irenaeus.
    In: TWI Research Paper Series.
    RePEc:twi:respas:0115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Collective decision-making of voters with heterogeneous levels of rationality. (2019). Xu, Youzong.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:178:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-018-00627-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The strategic environment effect in beauty contest games. (2019). Willinger, Marc ; Sutan, Angela ; Koriyama, Yukio ; Hanaki, Nobuyuki.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01929113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Are Low Interest Rates Deflationary? A Paradox of Perfect-Foresight Analysis. (2019). Woodford, Michael ; Garcia-Schmidt, Mariana.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:109:y:2019:i:1:p:86-120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Catalog Competition: Equilibrium Characterization and experimental evidence. (2018). Xefteris, Dimitrios ; Georgantzís, Nikolaos ; García-Gallego, Aurora ; Barreda-Tarrazona, Iván ; Georgantzis, Nikolaos ; Garcia-Gallego, Aurora.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:jau:wpaper:2018/08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The strategic environment effect in beauty contest games. (2018). Willinger, Marc ; Sutan, Angela ; Koriyama, Yukio ; Hanaki, Nobuyuki.
    In: CEE-M Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpceem:hal-01954922.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The strategic environment effect in beauty contest games. (2018). Willinger, Marc ; Sutan, Angela ; Koriyama, Yukio ; Hanaki, Nobuyuki.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01954922.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Determinants of Equilibrium Selection in Network Formation: An Experiment. (2018). Rosenkranz, Stephanie ; Hoyer, Britta.
    In: Games.
    RePEc:gam:jgames:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:89-:d:180259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Electoral competition with third party entry in the lab. (2018). Xefteris, Dimitrios ; Tsakas, Nikolas.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:148:y:2018:i:c:p:121-134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Strategic Reasoning in Persuasion Games: An Experiment. (2018). Schipper, Burkhard ; Li, Yingxue.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cda:wpaper:111.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Depth of Reasoning and Information Revelation: An Experiment on the Distribution of k-Levels. (2017). Kübler, Dorothea ; Benndorf, Volker ; Normann, Hans-Theo ; Kubler, Dorothea.
    In: International Game Theory Review (IGTR).
    RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:19:y:2017:i:04:n:s0219198917500219.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Does Strategic Ability Affect Efficiency? Evidence from Electricity Markets. (2017). Puller, Steven ; Hortacsu, Ali ; Luco, Fernando ; Zhu, Dongni ; Hortasu, Ali.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:23526.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Strategy-proofness of stochastic assignment mechanisms. (2017). Schmelzer, André.
    In: Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2017_13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Passing the Buck On the acceptance of responsibility. (2017). Bolle, Friedel.
    In: Research in Economics.
    RePEc:eee:reecon:v:71:y:2017:i:1:p:86-101.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Inspired and inspiring: Hervé Moulin and the discovery of the beauty contest game. (2017). Nagel, Rosemarie ; Frank, Björn ; Buhren, Christoph.
    In: Mathematical Social Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:90:y:2017:i:c:p:191-207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Cooperating over losses and competing over gains: A social dilemma experiment. (2017). Schwardmann, Peter ; Ispano, Alessandro.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:105:y:2017:i:c:p:329-348.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Designing contests between heterogeneous contestants: An experimental study of tie-breaks and bid-caps in all-pay auctions. (2016). Sheremeta, Roman ; Llorente-Saguer, Aniol ; Szech, Nora.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2016307.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Designing contests between heterogeneous contestants: An experimental study of tie-breaks and bid-caps in all-pay auctions. (2016). Sheremeta, Roman ; Llorente-Saguer, Aniol ; Szech, Nora.
    In: Working Paper Series in Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:kitwps:88.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Cognitive Hierarchies in the Minimizer Game. (2016). Fellner-Röhling, Gerlinde ; Berger, Ulrich ; de Silva, Hannelore ; Fellner-Rohling, Gerlinde.
    In: Department of Economics Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wiw:wus005:4805.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Cognitive Hierarchies in the Minimizer Game. (2016). Fellner-Röhling, Gerlinde ; Berger, Ulrich ; de Silva, Hannelore ; Fellner-Rohling, Gerlinde.
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwwuw:wuwp211.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Designing Contests Between Heterogeneous Contestants: An Experimental Study of Tie-Breaks and Bid-Caps in All-Pay Auctions. (2016). Sheremeta, Roman ; Llorente-Saguer, Aniol ; Szech, Nora.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:wp796.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Designing Contests Between Heterogeneous Contestants: An Experimental Study of Tie-Breaks and Bid-Caps in All-Pay Auctions. (2016). Sheremeta, Roman ; Llorente-Saguer, Aniol ; Szech, Nora.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:796.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Designing Contests Between Heterogeneous Contestants: An Experimental Study of Tie-Breaks and Bid-Caps in All-Pay Auctions. (2016). Sheremeta, Roman ; Llorente-Saguer, Aniol ; Szech, Nora.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:71202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The strategic environment effect in beauty contest games. (2016). Willinger, Marc ; Sutan, Angela ; Hanaki, Nobuyuki ; Willnger, Marc .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:lam:wpaper:03-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The strategic environment effect in beauty contest games. (2016). Willinger, Marc ; Sutan, Angela ; Hanaki, Nobuyuki.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01294915.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The Strategic Environment Effect in Beauty Contest Games. (2016). Willinger, Marc ; Sutan, Angela ; Hanaki, Nobuyuki.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2016-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Gender differences and stereotypes in strategic thinking. (2016). Sánchez-Pagés, Santiago ; Cubel, Maria ; Sanchez-Pages, Santiago.
    In: UB School of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:ewp:wpaper:338web.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Logical omniscience at the laboratory. (2016). Renou, Ludovic ; Bayer, Ralph-C.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:64:y:2016:i:c:p:41-49.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Logical abilities and behavior in strategic-form games. (2016). Renou, Ludovic ; Bayer, Ralph-C.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:56:y:2016:i:c:p:39-59.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Cognitive load and strategic sophistication. (2016). Smith, John ; Duffy, Sean ; Allred, Sarah .
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:125:y:2016:i:c:p:162-178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. A generalized cognitive hierarchy model of games. (2016). Ho, Teck ; Chong, Juin-Kuan ; Camerer, Colin.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:99:y:2016:i:c:p:257-274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Designing Contests Between Heterogeneous Contestants: An Experimental Study of Tie-Breaks and Bid-Caps in All-Pay Auctions. (2016). Sheremeta, Roman ; Llorente-Saguer, Aniol ; Szech, Nora.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:chu:wpaper:16-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Designing Contests Between Heterogeneous Contestants: An Experimental Study of Tie-Breaks and Bid-Caps in All-Pay Auctions. (2016). Sheremeta, Roman ; Llorente-Saguer, Aniol ; Szech, Nora.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_5955.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Robust Predictions under Finite Depth of Reasoning. (2015). Murayama, Kota.
    In: Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:kob:dpaper:dp2015-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. On the persistence of strategic sophistication. (2015). Weber, Roberto ; Healy, Paul ; Georganas, Sotiris.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:159:y:2015:i:pa:p:369-400.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Privacy concerns, voluntary disclosure of information, and unraveling: An experiment. (2015). Kübler, Dorothea ; Benndorf, Volker ; Normann, Hans-Theo ; Kubler, Dorothea.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:75:y:2015:i:c:p:43-59.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Social preferences are not enough: Accounting for anomalous behavior in a complex mixed-motive game. (2015). Tohmé, Fernando ; Moro, Rodrigo ; Tohme, Fernando ; Freidin, Esteban.
    In: Revista Cuadernos de Economia.
    RePEc:col:000093:012719.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Cognitive load and strategic sophistication. (2014). Smith, John ; Duffy, Sean ; Allred, Sarah .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:59441.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Explaining Behavior in the 11-20 Game. (2014). Kaplan, Todd ; Choo, Lawrence ; Choo, Lawrence C. Y, .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:52808.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Gender differences and stereotypes in the beauty contest. (2014). Sánchez-Pagés, Santiago ; Cubel, Maria ; Sanchez-Pages, Santiago.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ieb:wpaper:doc2014-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Gender differences and stereotypes in the beauty contest. (2014). Sanchez-Pages, Santiago ; Cubel, Maria.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ieb:wpaper:2013/6/doc2014-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Decision time and steps of reasoning in a competitive market entry game. (2014). Lindner, Florian.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:122:y:2014:i:1:p:7-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Gender Differences in Strategic Reasoning. (2014). Dittrich, Marcus ; Leipold, Kristina .
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4763.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Privacy concerns, voluntary disclosure of information, and unraveling: An experiment. (2013). Normann, Hans-Theo ; Kübler, Dorothea ; Kubler, Dorothea ; Benndorf, Volker.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbmbh:spii2013208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Decision time and steps of reasoning in a competitive market entry game. (2013). Lindner, Florian.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2013-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Privacy Concerns, Voluntary Disclosure of Information, and Unraveling: An Experiment. (2013). Normann, Hans-Theo ; Kübler, Dorothea ; Benndorf, Volker ; Kubler, Dorothea.
    In: SFB 649 Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2013-040.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Level-k reasoning and time pressure in the 11–20 money request game. (2013). Sutter, Matthias ; Lindner, Florian.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:120:y:2013:i:3:p:542-545.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Multi-dimensional iterative reasoning in action: The case of the Colonel Blotto game. (2012). Rubinstein, Ariel ; Arad, Ayala.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:84:y:2012:i:2:p:571-585.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-20 11:51:50 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.