References contributed by pwa594-3905710
- Agranov, M., Healy, P.J., Nielsen, K., 2020. Stable randomization. Mimeo. Andersen, S., Harrison, G.W., Lau, M.I., Rutström, E.E., 2006. Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experimental Economics 9, 383–405.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Arad, A., Rubinstein, A., 2012. The 11-20 money request game: A level-k reasoning study. American Economic Review 102 (7), 3561–3573.
Battalio, R.C., Kagel, J.H., Jiranyakul, K., 1990. Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3 (1), 25–50.
- Berninghaus, S., Todorova, L., Vogt, B., 2015. A simple questionnaire can change everything: Are strategy choices in the coordination and ultimatum games stable? In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom together with DataCom 2015 and SC2 2015, pp. 452–456.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bosch-Rosa, C., Meissner, T., Bosch-Domènech, A., 2018. Cognitive bubbles. Experimental Economics 21 (1), 132–153.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Brenner, T., Vriend, N.J., 2006. On the behavior of proposers in ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 61 (4), 617–631.
- Camerer, C., 2003. Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Candelo, N., Eckel, C., Johnson, C., 2019. The proposer’s behavior in the ultimatum game in 11 Mexican villages. Economics Letters 177, 5–8.
- Carpenter, J.P., Burks, S., Verhoogen, E., 2005. Comparing students to workers: The effects of social framing on behavior in distribution games. In: Carpenter, J., Harrison, G., List, J. (Eds.), Field Experiments in Economics, Research in Experimental Economics, Volume 10. JAI/Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston, pp. 261–290.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Chakravarty, S., Harrison, G.W., Haruvy, E.E., Rutström, E.E., 2011. Are you risk averse over other people’s money? Southern Economic Journal 77, 901–913.
Charness, G., Garcia, T., Offerman, T., Villeval, M.C., 2020. Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 60, 99–123.
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., 2012. Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 83 (1), 50–58.
Chen, D.L., Schonger, M., Wickens, C., 2016. oTree - an open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 9, 88–97.
Chuah, S., Hoffmann, R., Jones, M., Williams, G., 2007. Do cultures clash? Evidence from cross-national ultimatum game experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 64, 35–48.
Cooper, D.J., Feltovich, N., Roth, A.E., Zwick, R., 2003. Relative versus absolute speed of adjustment in strategic environments: Responder behavior in ultimatum games. Experimental Economics 6, 181–207.
- Cooper, D.J., Kagel, J.H., 2016. Other regarding preferences: A selective survey of experimental results. In: Kagel, J.H., Roth, A.E. (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Volume 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 217–289.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cox, J.C., Sadiraj, V., 2006. Small- and large-stakes risk aversion: Implications of concavity calibration for decision theory. Games and Economic Behavior 56 (Issue 1), 45–60.
Cueva, C., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Mata-Pérez, E., Ponti, G., Sartarelli, M., Yu, H., Zhukova, V., 2016. Cognitive (ir)reflection: New experimental evidence. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 64, 81–93.
Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J., 2001. Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry 39 (2), 171–188.
Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J., 2002. Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes towards financial risks. Evolution and Human Behavior 23, 281–295.
Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J., 2008. Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. In: Plott, C., Smith, V. (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Volume 1. New York: Elsevier, pp. 1061–1073.
Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J.L., Savin, N.E., Sefton, M., 1994. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior 6 (3), 347–369.
- Frontiers in psychology 10, 1548.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gal, I., Baron, J., 1996. Understanding repeated simple choices. Thinking & Reasoning 2 (1), 81–98.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gale, J., Binmore, K., Samuelson, L., 1995. Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game. Games and Economic Behavior 8, 56–90.
- Garcia-Gallego, A., Georgantzis, N., Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, A., 2012. Gender differences in ultimatum games: Despite rather than due to risk attitudes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 83, 42–49.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gneezy, U., Potters, J., 1997. An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2), 631–645.
- Goodnow, J.J., 1955. Response sequences in a pair of two-choice probability situations. American Journal of Psychology 68, 624–630.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Güth, W., Kocher, M.G., 2014. More than thirty years of ultimatum bargaining experiments: Motives, variations, and a survey of the recent literature. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 108, 396–409.
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B., 1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3, 367–388.
Harrison, G.W., Lau, M.I., Rutström, E.E., 2007. Estimating risk attitudes in Denmark: A field experiment. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 109, 341–368.
Henrich, J., 2000. Does culture matter in economic behavior? Ultimatum game bargaining among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. American Economic Review 90 (4), 973–979.
- Hey, J.D., 2014. Choice under uncertainty: Empirical methods and experimental results. In: Machina, M.J., Viscusi, W.K. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, Volume 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 809–850.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Holt, C.A., Laury, S.K., 2002. Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review 92 (5), 1644–1655.
- Holt, C.A., Laury, S.K., 2014. Assessment and estimation of risk preferences. In: Machina, M.J., Viscusi, W.K. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, Volume 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 135–201.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (2), 263–291.
- Kim, D. G., Kim, H. C., 2021. Probability matching and strategic decision making. Mimeo.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Koehler, D.J., James, G., 2010. Probability matching and strategy availability. Memory & Cognition 38 (6), 667–676.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Li, S., Qin, X., Houser, D., 2018. Revisiting gender differences in ultimatum bargaining: experimental evidence from the us and china. Journal of the Economic Science Association 4, 180–190.
- Machina, M.J., Viscusi, W.K. (Eds.), 2014. Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, Volume 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Neimark, E.D., Shuford, E.H., 1959. Comparison of predictions and estimates in a probability learning situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (5), 294–298.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Noussair, C.N., Trautmann, S.T., van de Kuilen, G., 2014. Higher order risk attitudes, demographics, and financial decisions. Review of Economic Studies 81, 325–355.
Oechssler, J., Roider, A., Schmitz, P.W., 2009. Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 72, 147–152.
Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., van de Kuilen, G., 2004. Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics 7, 171–188.
Rabin, M., Weizsäcker, G., 2009. Narrow bracketing and dominated choices. American Economic Review 99 (4), 1508–1543.
- Reani, M., Davies, A., Peek, N., Jay, C., 2019. Evidencing how experience and problem format affect probabilistic reasoning through interaction analysis.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rubinstein, A., 2002. Irrational diversification in multiple decision problems. European Economic Review 46 (8), 1369–1378.
Rubinstein, A., 2006. Dilemmas of an economic theorist. Econometrica 74 (4), 865–883.
- Shanks, D.R., Tunney, R.J., McCarthy, J.D., 2002. A re-examination of probability matching and rational choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15 (3), 233–250.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Solnick, S.J., 2001. Gender differences in the ultimatum game. Economic Inquiry 39 (2), 189–200.
- T. Qi et al. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 202 (2022) 227–254 Grant, D.A., Hake, H.W., Hornseth, J.P., 1951. Acquisition and extinction of a verbal conditioned response with differing percentages of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (1), 1–5.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Thaler, R.H., 1988. The ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, 195–206.
Thaler, R.H., 2016. Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future. American Economic Review 106 (7), 1577–1600.
- Trautmann, S.T., van de Kuilen, G., 2015. Ambiguity attitudes. In: Keren, G., Wu, G. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Blackwell, pp. 89–116.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Vulkan, N., 2000. An economist’s perspective on probability matching. Journal of economic surveys 14 (1), 101–118.
- West, R.F., Stanovich, K.E., 2003. Is probability matching smart? Associations between probabilistic choices and cognitive ability. Memory & Cognition 31 (2), 243–251.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now