- Aksoy, B. ; Chadd, I. ; Osun, E. ; Ozbay, E. Behavioral changes of mturkers during the covid-19 pandemic. 2021 :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Alesina, A. ; Angeletos, G.-M. Fairness and redistribution. 2005 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 95 960-980
Almås, I. ; Cappelen, A.W. ; Tungodden, B. Cutthroat capitalism versus cuddly socialism: Are Americans more meritocratic and efficiency-seeking than scandinavians?. 2020 J. Polit. Econ.. 128 1753-1788
Andreoni, J. Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. 1989 J. Polit. Econ.. 97 1447-1458
Ankel-Peters, J. ; Fiala, N. ; Neubauer, F. Do economists replicate?. 2023 J. Econ. Behav. Organ.. 212 219-232
- Arechar, A.A. ; Rand, D.G. Turking in the time of covid. 2021 Behav. Res. Methods. 53 2591-2595
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Batrancea, L.M. ; Kudła, J. ; Błaszczak, B. ; Kopyt, M. Differences in tax evasion attitudes between students and entrepreneurs under the slippery slope framework. 2022 J. Econ. Behav. Organ.. 200 464-482
Belot, M. ; Duch, R. ; Miller, L. A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games. 2015 J. Econ. Behav. Organ.. 113 26-33
Berg, J. ; Dickhaut, J. ; McCabe, K. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. 1995 Games Econ. Behav.. 10 122-142
- Bohannon, J. Mechanical turk upends social sciences. 2016 Science. -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bolton, G.E. ; Ockenfels, A. ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. 2000 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 90 166-193
Brañas-Garza, P. Promoting helping behavior with framing in dictator games. 2007 J. Econ. Psychol.. 28 477-486
Branas-Garza, P. ; Cobo-Reyes, R. ; Espinosa, M.P. ; Jiménez, N. ; Kovářík, J. ; Ponti, G. Altruism and social integration. 2010 Games Econom. Behav.. 69 249-257
Buso, I.M. ; Di Cagno, D. ; Ferrari, L. ; Larocca, V. ; Lorè, L. ; Marazzi, F. ; Panaccione, L. ; Spadoni, L. Lab-like findings from online experiments. 2021 J. Econ. Sci. Assoc.. 7 184-193
- Butler, D.M. ; Kousser, T. How do public goods providers play public goods games?. 2015 Legislative Stud. Q.. 40 211-240
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Callen, M. Catastrophes and time preference: Evidence from the indian ocean earthquake. 2015 J. Econ. Behav. Organ.. 118 199-214
Camerer, C.F. ; Dreber, A. ; Forsell, E. ; Ho, T.-H. ; Huber, J. ; Johannesson, M. ; Kirchler, M. ; Almenberg, J. ; Altmejd, A. ; Chan, T. Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. 2016 Science. 351 1433-1436
- Camerer, C.F. ; Dreber, A. ; Johannesson, M. Replication and other practices for improving scientific quality in experimental economics. 2019 Handb. Res. Methods Appl. Exp. Econ.. 83-102
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cappelen, A.W. ; Moene, K.O. ; Sørensen, E.Ø. ; Tungodden, B. Needs versus entitlements—An international fairness experiment. 2013 J. Eur. Econom. Assoc.. 11 574-598
Cappelen, A.W. ; Nygaard, K. ; Sørensen, E.Ø. ; Tungodden, B. Social preferences in the lab: A comparison of students and a representative population. 2015 Scand. J. Econ.. 117 1306-1326
Carter, J.R. ; Irons, M.D. Are economists different, and if so, why?. 1991 J. Econ. Perspect.. 5 171-177
Castillo, M. ; Leo, G. ; Petrie, R. Room composition effects on risk taking by gender. 2020 Exp. Econ.. 23 895-911
Chandar, B. ; Gneezy, U. ; List, J.A. ; Muir, I. The Drivers of Social Preferences: Evidence from a Nationwide Tipping Field Experiment. 2019 National Bureau of Economic Research:
Charness, G. ; Rabin, M. Understanding social preferences with simple tests. 2002 Q. J. Econ.. 117 817-869
Cleave, B.L. ; Nikiforakis, N. ; Slonim, R. Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences. 2013 Exp. Econ.. 16 372-382
Dana, J. ; Weber, R.A. ; Kuang, J.X. Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. 2007 Econom. Theory. 33 67-80
DellaVigna, S. ; List, J.A. ; Malmendier, U. ; Rao, G. Estimating social preferences and gift exchange at work. 2022 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 112 1038-1074
Di Tella, R. ; Perez-Truglia, R. ; Babino, A. ; Sigman, M. Conveniently upset: Avoiding altruism by distorting beliefs about others’ altruism. 2015 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 105 3416-3442
- Dreber, A. ; Johannesson, M. A Framework for Evaluating Reproducibility and Replicability in the Social Sciences. 2022 Mimeo:
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Drouvelis, M. Dictator giving and taking: Evidence from Africa. 2023 J. Econ. Behav. Organ.. 209 326-333
Drouvelis, M. ; Marx, B.M. Dimensions of donation preferences: The structure of peer and income effects. 2021 Exp. Econ.. 24 274-302
Eckel, C. ; Sinha, N. ; Wilson, R. The evolution of preferences and charitable giving: A panel study of the university years. 2023 Oxf. Econ. Pap.. 75 1073-1092
Eckel, C.C. ; El-Gamal, M.A. ; Wilson, R.K. Risk loving after the storm: A Bayesian-network study of Hurricane Katrina Evacuees. 2009 J. Econ. Behav. Organ.. 69 110-124
Eckel, C.C. ; Grossman, P.J. Volunteers and pseudo-volunteers: The effect of recruitment method in dictator experiments. 2000 Exp. Econ.. 3 107-120
Engelmann, D. How not to extend models of inequality aversion. 2012 J. Econ. Behav. Organ.. 81 599-605
Engelmann, D. ; Strobel, M. Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: reply. 2006 Am. Econ. Rev.. 96 1918-1923
Engelmann, D. ; Strobel, M. Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. 2004 Am. Econ. Rev.. 94 857-869
Engelmann, D. ; Strobel, M. Preferences over income distributions: Experimental evidence. 2007 Public Finance Rev.. 35 285-310
Espín, A.M. ; Correa, M. ; Ruiz-Villaverde, A. Economics students: Self-selected in preferences and indoctrinated in beliefs. 2022 Int. Rev. Econ. Educ.. 39 -
- Exadaktylos, F. ; Espín, A.M. ; Branas-Garza, P. Experimental subjects are not different. 2013 Sci. Rep.. 3 1213-
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Exley, C.L. ; Petrie, R. The impact of a surprise donation ask. 2018 J. Public Econ.. 158 152-167
Fehr, E. ; Charness, G. Social preferences: fundamental characteristics and economic consequences. 2023 :
Fehr, E. ; Kirchsteiger, G. ; Riedl, A. Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. 1993 Q. J. Econ.. 108 437-459
Fehr, E. ; Naef, M. ; Schmidt, K.M. Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: comment. 2006 Am. Econ. Rev.. 96 1912-1917
Fehr, E. ; Schmidt, K.M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. 1999 Q. J. Econ.. 114 817-868
Fisman, R. ; Jakiela, P. ; Kariv, S. Distributional preferences and political behavior. 2017 J. Public Econ.. 155 1-10
Fréchette, G.R. ; Sarnoff, K. ; Yariv, L. Experimental economics: Past and future. 2022 Annu. Rev. Econ.. 14 777-794
Frigau, L. ; Medda, T. ; Pelligra, V. From the field to the lab. An experiment on the representativeness of standard laboratory subjects. 2019 J. Behav. Exp. Econ.. 78 160-169
Gächter, S. ; Nosenzo, D. ; Sefton, M. Peer effects in pro-social behavior: Social norms or social preferences?. 2013 J. Eur. Econom. Assoc.. 11 548-573
Gerlach, P. The games economists play: Why economics students behave more selfishly than other students. 2017 PLoS One. 12 -
- Goodman, J.K. ; Cryder, C.E. ; Cheema, A. Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical turk samples. 2013 J. Behav. Decis. Mak.. 26 213-224
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hamermesh, D.S. Replication in economics. 2007 Can. J. Econ./Revue Can. d’économ.. 40 715-733
Hamman, J.R. ; Loewenstein, G. ; Weber, R.A. Self-interest through delegation: An additional rationale for the principal–agent relationship. 2010 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 100 1826-1846
Hanaki, N., Hoshino, T., Kubota, K., Murtin, F., Ogaki, M., Ohtake, F., Okuyama, N., 2022. Comparing Data Gathered in an Online and a Laboratory Experiment Using the Trustlab Platform. Technical report, ISER Discussion Paper.
Hanaoka, C. ; Shigeoka, H. ; Watanabe, Y. Do risk preferences change? Evidence from the great east Japan earthquake. 2018 Am. Econ. J.: Appl. Econ.. 10 298-330
- Henrich, J. ; Ensminger, J. ; McElreath, R. ; Barr, A. ; Barrett, C. ; Bolyanatz, A. ; Cardenas, J.C. ; Gurven, M. ; Gwako, E. ; Henrich, N. Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. 2010 Science. 327 1480-1484
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ho, T.-H. ; Su, X. Peer-induced fairness in games. 2009 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 99 2022-2049
- Hoffmann, M. ; Mosquera, R. ; Chadi, A. Vaccines at work. 2021 :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hooghe, M. ; Stolle, D. ; Mahéo, V.-A. ; Vissers, S. Why can’ta student be more like an average person?: Sampling and attrition effects in social science field and laboratory experiments. 2010 Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci.. 628 85-96
Horton, J.J. ; Rand, D.G. ; Zeckhauser, R.J. The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. 2011 Exp. Econ.. 14 399-425
- Huff, C. ; Tingley, D. Who are these people? Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of mturk survey respondents. 2015 Res. Politics. 2 -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jakiela, P. How fair shares compare: Experimental evidence from two cultures. 2015 J. Econ. Behav. Organ.. 118 40-54
Jakiela, P. Social preferences and fairness norms as informal institutions: Experimental evidence. 2011 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 101 509-513
Jakiela, P. ; Ozier, O. The impact of violence on individual risk preferences: evidence from a natural experiment. 2019 Rev. Econ. Stat.. 101 547-559
Marwell, G. ; Ames, R.E. Economists free ride, does anyone else?: Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV. 1981 J. Public Econ.. 15 295-310
- Mas, A. ; Moretti, E. Peers at work. 2009 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 99 112-145
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nosek, B.A. ; Errington, T.M. Making sense of replications. 2017 Elife. 6 -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Palan, S. ; Schitter, C. Prolific. ac—A subject pool for online experiments. 2018 J. Behav. Exp. Finance. 17 22-27
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Paolacci, G. ; Chandler, J. Inside the turk: Understanding mechanical turk as a participant pool. 2014 Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.. 23 184-188
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Paolacci, G. ; Chandler, J. ; Ipeirotis, P.G. Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. 2010 Judgm. Decis. Mak.. 5 411-419
- Patil, P. ; Peng, R.D. ; Leek, J.T. What should researchers expect when they replicate studies? A statistical view of replicability in psychological science. 2016 Perspect. Psychol. Sci.. 11 539-544
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Prissé, B. ; Jorrat, D. Lab vs online experiments: No differences. 2022 J. Behav. Exp. Econ.. 100 -
- Schmidt, S. Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. 2009 Rev. Gen. Psychol.. 13 90-100
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Snowberg, E. ; Yariv, L. Testing the waters: Behavior across participant pools. 2021 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 111 687-719
- Stigler, G.J. ; Becker, G.S. De gustibus non est disputandum. 1977 Am. Econ. Rev.. 67 76-90
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Zhang, Y. ; Palma, M.A. Revisiting sugar taxes and sugary drink consumption: Evidence from the random-coefficient demand model. 2021 J. Agric. Resour. Econ.. 46 37-55