1. Carbon tariffs and environmental policy: Taxes versus standards. (2024). Lin, Chin-Ho ; Wu, Tsaurchin ; Chang, Chiajen.
   In: International Journal of Economic Theory.
   RePEc:bla:ijethy:v:20:y:2024:i:3:p:269-302.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Antoniou, F. ; Hatzipanayotou, P. ; Michael, M.S. ; Tsakiris, N. Tax competition in the presence of environmental spillovers. 2022 Int. Tax Public Finance. 29 600-626

2. Baldwin, R. ; Forslid, R. ; Martin, P. ; Ottaviano, G. ; Robert-Nicoud, F. Economic Geography and Public Policy. 2011 Princeton University Press:
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Balistreri, E.J. ; Kaffine, D.T. ; Yonezawa, H. Optimal environmental border adjustments under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. 2019 Environ. Res. Econ.. 74 1037-1075

4. Barrett, S. Environmental policy and international trade. 1994 J. Public Econ.. 54 325-338
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Behrens, K. ; Hamilton, J.H. ; Ottaviano, G.I. ; Thisse, J.F. Commodity tax competition and industry location under the destination and the origin principle. 2009 Reg. Sci. Urban Econ.. 39 422-433

6. Benarroch, M. ; Weder, R. Intra-industry trade in intermediate products, pollution and internationally increasing returns. 2006 J. Environ. Econ. Manag.. 52 675-689

7. Böhringer, C. ; Carbone, J.C. ; Rutherford, T.F. Embodied carbon tariffs. 2018 Scand. J. Econ.. 120 183-210

8. Böhringer, C. ; Fischer, C. ; Rosendahl, K.E. ; Rutherford, T.F. Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments. 2022 Nature Clim. Change. 12 22-29

9. Bucovetsky, S. Asymmetric tax competition. 1991 J. Urban Econ.. 30 167-181

10. Burguet, R. ; Sempere, J. Trade liberalization, environmental policy, and welfare. 2003 J. Environ. Econ. Manag.. 46 25-37
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Chao, C.C. ; Laffargue, J.P. ; Sgro, P.M. Tariff and environmental policies with product standards. 2012 Can. J. Econ.. 45 978-995

12. Chao, C.C. ; Yu, E.S. Environmental impacts of tariff and tax reforms under origin and destination principles. 2015 Pac. Econ. Rev.. 20 310-322

13. Cheng, H. Consumption pollution and taxes under endogenous firm locations and asymmetric market sizes. 2021 Int. Tax Public Finance. 30 1601-1632
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Copeland, B.R. Pollution content tariffs, environmental rent shifting, and the control of cross-border pollution. 1996 J. Int. Econ.. 40 459-476
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Copeland, B.R. ; Taylor, M.S. Trade and the environment: A partial synthesis. 1995 Am. J. Agricult. Econ.. 77 765-771

16. Davis, L.W. ; Kahn, M.E. International trade in used vehicles: The environmental consequences of NAFTA. 2010 Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy. 2 58-82

17. Davis, S.J. ; Caldeira, K. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. 2010 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.. 107 5687-5692
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Dixit, A.K. ; Stiglitz, J.E. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. 1977 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 67 297-308

19. Forslid, R. ; Okubo, T. ; Sanctuary, M. Trade liberalization, transboundary pollution, and market size. 2017 J. Assoc. Environ. Res. Econ.. 4 927-957

20. Gurtzgen, N. ; Rauscher, M. Environmental policy, intra-industry trade and transfrontier pollution. 2000 Environ. Res. Econ.. 17 59-71

21. Haupt, A. Environmental policy in open economies and monopolistic competition. 2006 Environ. Res. Econ.. 33 143-167

22. Haupt, A. Environmental product standards, international trade and monopolistic competition. 2000 Int. Tax Public Finance. 7 585-608

23. Helpman, E. ; Krugman, P. Trade Policy and Market Structure. 1989 MIT Press:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Hu, B. ; McKitrick, R. Decomposing the environmental effects of trade liberalization: The case of consumption-generated pollution. 2016 Environ. Res. Econ.. 64 205-223

25. Keen, M. ; Kotsogiannis, C. Coordinating climate and trade policies: Pareto efficiency and the role of border tax adjustments. 2014 J. Int. Econ.. 94 119-128

26. Kennedy, P.W. Equilibrium pollution taxes in open economies with imperfect competition. 1994 J. Environ. Econ. Manag.. 27 49-63
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

27. Kortum, S. ; Weisbach, D. The design of border adjustments for carbon prices. 2017 Natl. Tax J.. 70 421-446

28. Kreickemeier, U. ; Richter, P.M. Trade and the environment: The role of firm heterogeneity. 2014 Rev. Int. Econ.. 22 209-225

29. Lai, Y.-B. Environmental policy competition and heterogeneous capital endowments. 2019 Reg. Sci. Urban Econ.. 75 107-119

30. Lai, Y.-B. ; Hu, C.-H. Trade agreements, domestic environmental regulation, and transboundary pollution. 2008 Resour. Energy Econ.. 30 209-228

31. Larch, M. ; Wanner, J. Carbon tariffs: An analysis of the trade, welfare, and emission effects. 2017 J. Int. Econ.. 109 195-213

32. Liddle, B. Consumption-based accounting and the trade-carbon emissions nexus. 2018 Energy Econ.. 69 71-78

33. Lo, J. World Bank targets dirty subsidies to fund climate action. 2023 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

34. McAusland, C. Harmonizing tailpipe policy in symmetric countries: Improve the environment, improve welfare?. 2005 J. Environ. Econ. Manag.. 50 229-251

35. Neary, J.P. International trade and the environment: Theoretical and policy linkages. 2006 Environ. Res. Econ.. 33 95-118
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Oates, W.E. ; Schwab, R.M. Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing?. 1988 J. Public Econ.. 35 333-354

37. Ogawa, H. ; Wildasin, D.E. Think locally, act locally: Spillovers, spillbacks, and efficient decentralized policymaking. 2009 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 99 1206-1217

38. Ottaviano, G. ; Tabuchi, T. ; Thisse, J.F. Agglomeration and trade revisited. 2002 Internat. Econom. Rev.. 43 409-435

39. Pflüger, M. Ecological dumping under monopolistic competition. 2001 Scand. J. Econ.. 103 689-706
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

40. Shapiro, J.S. The environmental bias of trade policy. 2021 Q. J. Econ.. 136 831-886

41. Tanguay, G.A. Strategic environmental policies under international duopolistic competition. 2001 Int. Tax Public Finance. 8 793-811

42. Tsakiris, N. ; Hatzipanayotou, P. ; Michael, M.S. Border tax adjustments and tariff-tax reforms with consumption pollution. 2019 J. Public Economic Theory. 21 1107-1125

43. Weisbach, D. ; Kortum, S.S. ; Wang, M. ; Yao, Y. Trade, Leakage, and the Design of a Carbon Tax (No.W30244). 2022 National Bureau of Economic Research:

44. Wellisch, D. Locational choices of firms and decentralized environmental policy with various instruments. 1995 J. Urban Econ.. 37 290-310

45. Wilson, J.D. Tax competition with interregional differences in factor endowments. 1991 Reg. Sci. Urban Econ.. 21 423-451

1. Winners and losers of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. An intra-EU issue?. (2025). Amendola, Marco.
   In: Energy Economics.
   RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:142:y:2025:i:c:s014098832400848x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Trade and Welfare Effects of New Trade Policy Instruments. (2024). Wolfmayr, Yvonne ; Pfaffermayr, Michael ; Meyer, Birgit ; Christen, Elisabeth ; Mahlkow, Hendrik.
   In: FIW Research Reports series.
   RePEc:wsr:ecbook:y:2024:m:01:i:2024-02.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Commodity taxation principle, heterogeneous goods, and endogenous choice between price and quantity contracts. (2024). Lin, Yu-Zhen ; Yen, Chih-Ta ; Chang, Chia-Jen.
   In: Journal of Economics.
   RePEc:kap:jeczfn:v:143:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s00712-024-00869-8.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Does e-commerce ease or intensify tax competition? Destination principle versus origin principle. (2024). Ogawa, Hikaru ; Aiura, Hiroshi.
   In: International Tax and Public Finance.
   RePEc:kap:itaxpf:v:31:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10797-023-09796-8.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Border Carbon Adjustments and Leakage in the Presence of Public Pollution Abatement Activities. (2024). Tsakiris, Nikos ; Vlassis, Nikolaos.
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:87:y:2024:i:9:d:10.1007_s10640-024-00882-x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Regulatory Stringency and Emission Leakage Mitigation. (2024). Tsakiris, Nikos ; ANTONIOU, FABIO ; Hatzipanayotou, Panos.
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:87:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s10640-023-00837-8.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. The economics of carbon leakage mitigation policies. (2024). Ambec, Stefan ; Esposito, Federico ; Pacelli, Antonia.
   In: Post-Print.
   RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04550380.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. The economics of carbon leakage mitigation policies. (2024). Ambec, Stefan ; Esposito, Federico ; Pacelli, Antonia.
   In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
   RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:125:y:2024:i:c:s0095069624000470.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Policy linkages, country size, and international capital distribution. (2024). Lai, Yu-Bong.
   In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
   RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:123:y:2024:i:c:s0095069623001237.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Can carbon tariffs based on domestic embedded carbon emissions reduce more carbon leakages?. (2024). Lin, Boqiang ; Jia, Zhijie ; Liu, YU ; Wen, Shiyan ; Wu, Rongxin.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:220:y:2024:i:c:s0921800924000600.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. The economics of carbon leakage mitigation policies. (2023). Pacelli, Antonia ; Esposito, Federico ; Ambec, Stefan.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:127834.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. The case for carbon leakage and border adjustments: where do economists stand?. (2023). Baudry, marc ; Cameron, Alienor.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:25:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10018-023-00366-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Effect of a European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on the APAC Region: A structural gravity analysis. (2023). Mortha, Aline ; Arimura, Toshi ; Chesnokova, Tatyana ; Shiro, Takeda ; Toshi, Arimura.
    In: Discussion papers.
    RePEc:eti:dpaper:23058.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Analysis of Chinas steel response ways to EU CBAM policy based on embodied carbon intensity prediction. (2023). Liu, Xing ; Lu, Can.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:282:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223022065.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. EU in search of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. (2023). Fontagné, Lionel ; Fontagne, Lionel ; Bellora, Cecilia.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:123:y:2023:i:c:s0140988323001718.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. North–South asymmetry, unilateral environmental policy and carbon tariffs. (2023). Anwar, Sajid ; Lv, Xiaofeng ; Huang, Wei ; Hong, Liming.
    In: Pacific Economic Review.
    RePEc:bla:pacecr:v:28:y:2023:i:2:p:241-266.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Regulatory Stringency and Emission Leakage Mitigation. (2023). Tsakiris, Nikos ; Hatzipanayotou, Panos ; ANTONIOU, FABIO.
    In: DEOS Working Papers.
    RePEc:aue:wpaper:2302.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Carbon border adjustment: a unilateral solution to the multilateral problem?. (2022). Suh, Jeongmeen.
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:22:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10784-022-09578-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Improvement Measures of Embodied Carbon Emissions in Interprovincial Trade for Coal Energy Supply Bases: Case Study of Anhui, China. (2022). Dong, Suocheng ; Xu, Shuangjie ; Liu, Qian ; Zhang, Menghan ; Guo, Kexin.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:17033-:d:1007361.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. The case for a Carbon Border Adjustment: Where do economists stand?. (2022). Baudry, marc ; Cameron, Alinor.
    In: Policy Papers.
    RePEc:fae:ppaper:2022.01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Making the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries. (2022). Vielle, Marc ; Perdana, Sigit.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:170:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522004645.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Know your opponent: Which countries might fight the European carbon border adjustment mechanism?. (2022). Sabyrbekov, Rahat ; Overland, Indra.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:169:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522003974.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Beggar thy neighbor? On the competitiveness and welfare impacts of the EUs proposed carbon border adjustment mechanism. (2022). Zhong, Jiarui ; Pei, Jiansuo.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:162:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522000271.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. EU in Search of a WTO-Compatible Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. (2022). Fontagné, Lionel ; Bellora, Cecilia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cii:cepidt:2022-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Free Trade, Environment, Agriculture, and Plurilateral Treaties: The Ambivalent Example of Mercosur, CETA, and the EU–Vietnam Free Trade Agreement. (2021). Roos, Paula ; Heyl, Katharine ; Stubenrauch, Jessica ; Ekardt, Felix ; Garske, Beatrice.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3153-:d:516228.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Pitfalls of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. (2021). Hong, Kyoungseo ; Yoon, Joo Young ; Chang, Jeong-In ; Cheong, Inkyo ; Lim, Byeongho.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7303-:d:671760.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Conjugation of border and domestic carbon adjustment and implications under production and consumption-based accounting of Indias National Emission Inventory: A recursive dynamic CGE analysis. (2021). Banerjee, Suvajit.
    In: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.
    RePEc:eee:streco:v:57:y:2021:i:c:p:68-86.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Climate policy and international trade – A critical appraisal of the literature. (2021). Jakob, Michael.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:156:y:2021:i:c:s030142152100269x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Optimal tariffs and firm technology choice: An environmental approach. (2021). Steffen, Nico.
    In: Review of International Economics.
    RePEc:bla:reviec:v:29:y:2021:i:5:p:1148-1160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. A sectoral approach allows an artful merger of climate and trade policy. (2020). Fitzgerald, Timothy ; Banks, George David.
    In: Climatic Change.
    RePEc:spr:climat:v:162:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10584-020-02822-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Carbon Border Adjustment and Alternatives. (2020). Bellora, Cecilia.
    In: Conference papers.
    RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Border vis-à-vis Domestic Carbon Adjustment: Implications of Alternative System Boundary for India to Reduce Carbon Emissions. (2020). Banerjee, Suvajit.
    In: Conference papers.
    RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333129.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-21 07:51:29 || Missing content? Let us know