Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Citations received by this document
References cited by this document
Documents which have cited the same bibliography
Authors who have wrote about the same topic
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Brueckner, J.K. A Tiebout/tax-competition model. 2000 J. Public Econ.. 77 285-306
Brueckner, J.K. Partial fiscal decentralization. 2009 Reg. Sci. Urban Econ.. 39 23-32
Bucovetsky, S. Asymmetric tax competition. 1991 J. Urban Econ.. 30 167-181
Ebel, R.D. ; Yilmaz, S. On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization. 2002 :
Gadenne, L. ; Singhal, M. Decentralization in developing economies. 2014 Annu. Rev. Econ.. 6 581-604
Goodspeed, T.J. Bailouts in a federation. 2002 Int. Tax Public Financ.. 9 409-421
Janeba, E. ; Todtenhaupt, M. Fiscal competition and public debt. 2018 J. Public Econ.. 168 47-61
Oates, W.E. An essay on fiscal federalism. 1999 J. Econ. Lit.. 37 1120-1149
Qian, Y. ; Roland, G. Federalism and the soft-budget constraint. 1998 Am. Econ. Rev.. 88 1146-1162
Tiebout, C. A pure theory of local expenditures. 1956 J. Polit. Econ.. 64 416-424
Wilson, J.D. Theories of tax competition. 1999 Natl. Tax J.. 52 269-304
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper
Full description at Econpapers || Download paper