Agarwal, R. ; Ganco, M. ; Ziedonis, R.H. Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. 2009 Strateg. Manag. J.. 30 1349-1374
- Allison, J.R. ; Lemley, M.A. Empirical evidence on the validity of litigated patents. 1998 Am. Intellect. Prop. Law Assoc. (AIPLA) Q. J.. 26 185-
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Allred, B.B. ; Park, W.G. Patent rights and innovative activity: Evidence from national and firm-level data. 2007 J. Int. Bus. Stud.. 38 878-900
Almeida, P. ; Kogut, B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. 1999 Manage. Sci.. 45 905-917
Anton, J.J. ; Yao, D.A. Finding “Lost” profits: An equilibrium analysis of patent infringement damages. 2007 J. Law Econ. Organ.. 23 186-207
- Arora, A. ; Branstetter, L. ; Chatterjee, C. Strong medicine: Patent reform and the emergence of a research-driven pharmaceutical industry in India. 2008 :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Arrow, K.J. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. 1962 En : Nelson, R.R. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. Princeton University Press (for NBER): Princeton, N.J.
- Ayres, I. ; Klemperer, P. Limiting patentees’ market power without reducing innovation incentives: The perverse benefits of uncertainty and non-injunctive remedies. 1999 Mich. Law Rev.. 97 985-1033
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bessen, J. ; Maskin, E. Sequential innovation, patents, and imitation. 2009 Rand J. Econ.. 40 611-635
Chen, Y. ; Puttitanun, T. Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. 2005 J. Dev. Econ.. 78 474-493
Chen, Y. ; Sappington, D.E. An optimal rule for patent damages under sequential innovation. 2018 Rand J. Econ.. 49 370-397
Choi, J.P. Alternative damage rules and probabilistic intellectual property rights: Unjust enrichment, lost profits, and reasonable royalty remedies. 2009 Inf. Econ. Policy. 21 145-157
Cohen, W.M. ; Nelson, R.R. ; Walsh, J.P. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). 2000 Natl. Bureau Econ. Res.. -
- Dey, A. ; Kaushik, A.K. ; Pal, R. Probabilistic patents, alternative damage rules, and optimal tariffs. 2019 J. Inst. Theor. Econ.. 1-36
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dinopoulos, E. ; Kottaridi, C. The growth effects of national patent policies. 2008 Rev. Int. Econ.. 16 499-515
Encaoua, D. ; Lefouili, Y. Choosing intellectual protection: Imitation, patent strength and licensing. 2005 En : Mairesse, J. ; Trajtenberg, M. Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 79/80. JSTOR:
Falvey, R. ; Foster, N. ; Greenaway, D. Intellectual property rights and economic growth. 2006 Rev. Dev. Econ.. 10 700-719
Fosfuri, A. ; Rønde, T. High-tech clusters, technology spillovers, and trade secret laws. 2004 Int. J. Ind. Organ.. 22 45-65
Franco, A.M. ; Mitchell, M.F. Covenants not to compete, labor mobility, and industry dynamics. 2008 J. Econ. Manag. Strategy. 17 581-606
Gallini, N.T. Patent policy and costly imitation. 1992 Rand J. Econ.. 23 52-63
Gallini, N.T. The economics of patents: Lessons from recent US patent reform. 2002 J. Econ. Perspect.. 16 131-154
Ganco, M. ; Ziedonis, R.H. ; Agarwal, R. More stars stay, but the brightest ones still leave: Job hopping in the shadow of patent enforcement. 2015 Strateg. Manag. J.. 36 659-685
Gilbert, R. ; Shapiro, C. Optimal patent length and breadth. 1990 Rand J. Econ.. 21 106-112
- Gilson, R.J. The legal infrastructure of high technology industrial districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and covenants not to compete. 1999 NYUl Rev.. 74 575-
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hall, B.H. Patents and patent policy. 2007 Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy. 23 568-587
Hall, B.H. ; Ziedonis, R.H. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. 2001 Rand J. Econ.. 32 101-128
Hellmann, T. When do employees become entrepreneurs?. 2007 Manage. Sci.. 53 919-933
- Hu, W. ; Yoshioka-Kobayashi, T. ; Watanabe, T. Determinants of patent infringement awards in the US, Japan, and China: A comparative analysis. 2020 World Pat. Inf.. 60 -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Iwaisako, T. ; Tanaka, H. ; Futagami, K. A welfare analysis of global patent protection in a model with endogenous innovation and foreign direct investment. 2011 Eur. Econ. Rev.. 55 1137-1151
Jaffe, A.B. The US patent system in transition: Policy innovation and the innovation process. 2000 Res. Policy. 29 531-557
Kaiser, U. ; Kongsted, H.C. ; Rønde, T. Does the mobility of R&D labor increase innovation?. 2015 J. Econ. Behav. Organ.. 110 91-105
Kanwar, S. ; Evenson, R. Does intellectual property protection spur technological change?. 2003 Oxf. Econ. Pap.. 55 235-264
- Kim, J. ; Marschke, G. Labor mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm’s patenting decision. 2005 Rand J. Econ.. 36 298-317
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kyle, M.K. ; McGahan, A.M. Investments in pharmaceuticals before and after TRIPS. 2012 Rev. Econ. Stat.. 94 1157-1172
Lemley, M.A. ; Shapiro, C. Probabilistic patents. 2005 J. Econ. Perspect.. 19 75-98
Lerner, J. The empirical impact of intellectual property rights on innovation: Puzzles and clues. 2009 Amer. Econ. Rev.. 99 343-348
- Marx, M. The firm strikes back: non-compete agreements and the mobility of technical professionals. 2011 Am. Sociol. Rev.. 76 695-712
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Marx, M. ; Strumsky, D. ; Fleming, L. Mobility, skills, and the michigan non-compete experiment. 2009 Manag. Sci.. 55 875-889
- Moore, K.A. Judges, juries, and patent cases: An empirical peek inside the black box. 2000 Mich. Law Rev.. 99 365-409
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Moser, P. How do patent laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth-century world’s fairs. 2005 Am. Econ. Rev.. 95 1214-1236
Oettl, A. ; Agrawal, A. International labor mobility and knowledge flow externalities. 2008 J. Int. Bus. Stud.. 39 1242-1260
Pakes, A. ; Nitzan, S. Optimum contracts for research personnel, research employment, and the establishment of “rival” enterprises. 1983 J. Labor Econ.. 1 345-365
Papageorgiadis, N. ; Sharma, A. Intellectual property rights and innovation: A panel analysis. 2016 Econom. Lett.. 141 70-72
- Reitzig, M. ; Henkel, J. ; Heath, C. Who really profits from patent infringements? A comparative international analysis of innovation and imitation incentives from patent indemnification rules. 2008 :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rosenkopf, L. ; Almeida, P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. 2003 Manage. Sci.. 49 751-766
- Rønde, T. Trade secrets and information sharing. 2001 J. Econ. Manag. Strategy. 10 391-417
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sakakibara, M. ; Branstetter, L. Do stronger patents induce more innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese patent law reforms. 2001 Rand J. Econ.. 32 77-100
Schankerman, M. ; Scotchmer, S. Damages and injunctions in protecting intellectual property. 2001 Rand J. Econ.. 32 199-220
Schankerman, M. ; Scotchmer, S. Still Looking for Lost Profits: The Case of Horizontal Competition. 2005 Department of Economics: UC Berkeley
- Seaman, C.B. ; Chien, C.V. ; Contreras, J.L. ; Cotter, T.F. ; Love, B.J. ; Siebrasse, N. . 2019 En : Enhanced Damages, Litigation Cost Recovery, and Interest, in Patent Remedies and Complex Products: Toward a Global Consensus (Brad Biddle et al. eds., 2019). Cambridge University Press:
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Shapiro, C. Antitrust limits to patent settlements. 2003 Rand J. Econ.. 34 391-411
- Shapiro, C. Patent remedies. 2016 Am. Econ. Rev.. 106 198-202
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Toh, P.K. ; Kim, T. Why put all your eggs in one basket? A competition-based view of how technological uncertainty affects a firm’s technological specialization. 2013 Organ. Sci.. 24 1214-1236