create a website

Beyond breakthrough research: Epistemic properties of research and their consequences for research funding. (2014). Glaser, Jochen ; Laudel, Grit.
In: Research Policy.
RePEc:eee:respol:v:43:y:2014:i:7:p:1204-1216.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 24

Citations received by this document

Cites: 56

References cited by this document

Cocites: 40

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Membership in team science institute enhances diversity of researchers’ collaboration networks. (2025). Barley, William C ; Allan, Brian F ; Johnson, Lauren P ; Dinh, LY.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0322943.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Peer review’s irremediable flaws: Scientists’ perspectives on grant evaluation in Germany. (2024). Paruschke, Laura ; Barlosius, Eva ; Philipps, Axel.
    In: Research Evaluation.
    RePEc:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2024:i:4:p:623-634..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Information Asymmetry in the European Funds Market: Impact on Resource Allocation and Sustainable Development. (2024). Piuaru, Brenda-Andreea ; Ivasciuc, Ioana Simona ; Mosora, Mihaela Hrisanta ; Epuran, Gheorghe ; Tescaiu, Bianca.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11101-:d:1546781.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. What is research funding, how does it influence research, and how is it recorded? Key dimensions of variation. (2023). Thelwall, Mike ; Simrick, Subreena ; Viney, Ian ; van den Besselaar, Peter.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:11:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04836-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Policy seduction and governance resistance? Examining public funding agencies and academic institutions on decarbonisation research. (2023). Abdul, Abbas.
    In: Science and Public Policy.
    RePEc:oup:scippl:v:50:y:2023:i:1:p:87-101..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. How scientists interpret and address funding criteria: value creation and undesirable side effects. (2023). Zhang, Jing A ; Haar, Jarrod ; Cunningham, James A ; Okane, Conor.
    In: Small Business Economics.
    RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:61:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11187-022-00697-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The Evaluation Gap in Astronomy—Explained through a Rational Choice Framework. (2023). Heuritsch, Julia.
    In: Publications.
    RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:33-:d:1162628.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Short-term incentives of research evaluations: Evidence from the UK Research Excellence Framework. (2023). Groen-Xu, Moqi ; Voigt, Thomas ; Teixeira, Pedro A ; Bos, Gregor ; Knapp, Bernhard.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:52:y:2023:i:6:s0048733323000136.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Individual excellence funding: effects on research autonomy and the creation of protected spaces. (2022). Jabrane, Leila.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01404-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Making the cut: How panel reviewers use evaluation devices to select applications at the European Research Council. (2022). Muller, Ruth ; Brunet, Lucas.
    In: Research Evaluation.
    RePEc:oup:rseval:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:486-497..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Transforming excellence? From ‘matter of fact’ to ‘matter of concern’ in research funding organizations. (2022). Pinfield, Stephen ; Franssen, Thomas ; Jong, Lisette.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:nduxf_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Original Innovation through Inter-Organizational Collaboration: Empirical Evidence from University-Focused Alliance Portfolio in China. (2022). Chen, Yutao ; Zhou, Jia ; Guo, Aifang.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6162-:d:818886.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Identifying potential breakthrough research: A machine learning method using scientific papers and Twitter data. (2022). Wen, Yang ; Li, Xin ; Daim, Tugrul ; Huang, Lucheng ; Jiang, Jiaojiao.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:184:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522005637.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Evidence of research mastery: How applicants argue the feasibility of their research projects. (2021). Blem, Kristina ; Barlosius, Eva.
    In: Research Evaluation.
    RePEc:oup:rseval:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:563-571..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Have Academics’ Citation Patterns Changed in Response to the Rise of World University Rankings? A Test Using First-Citation Speeds. (2021). Kim, Yangson ; Lee, Soojeung ; Steinhardt, Isabel ; Schneijderberg, Christian.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9515-:d:620743.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Reflexive Behaviour: How Publication Pressure Affects Research Quality in Astronomy. (2021). Heuritsch, Julia.
    In: Publications.
    RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:52-:d:675126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Mapping career patterns in research: A sequence analysis of career histories of ERC applicants. (2020). Fuchs, Stefan ; Connolly, Sara ; Vinkenburg, Claartje J ; Herschberg, Channah ; Schels, Brigitte.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0236252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis. (2019). de Nicolao, Giuseppe ; Petrovich, Eugenio ; Baccini, Alberto.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0221212.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Examining the dynamics of an emerging research network using the case of triboelectric nanogenerators. (2019). Ranaei, Samira ; Peng, Haoshu ; Suominen, Arho.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:146:y:2019:i:c:p:820-830.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Who moves to the methodological edge? Factors that encourage scientists to use unconventional methods. (2019). Koppman, Sharon ; Leahey, Erin.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:48:y:2019:i:9:32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Resolving tensions of research utilization: The value of a usability-based approach. (2018). Benneworth, Paul ; Olmos-Peuela, Julia.
    In: INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ing:wpaper:201410.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Institutional shaping of research priorities: A case study on avian influenza. (2018). Rafols, Ismael ; Wallace, Matthew L.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:47:y:2018:i:10:p:1975-1989.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Confined to a tokenistic status: Social scientists in leadership roles in a national health research funding agency. (2017). Laberge, Suzanne ; Albert, Mathieu .
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:185:y:2017:i:c:p:137-146.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Shaping the Agenda of a Grand Challenge: Institutional Mediation of Priorities in Avian Influenza Research. (2016). Rafols, Ismael ; Wallace, Matthew L.
    In: SPRU Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:sru:ssewps:2016-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Böhme, G. ; Van den Daele, W. ; Hohlfeld, R. ; Krohn, W. ; Schäfer, W. Finalization in Science. The Social Orientation of Scientific Progress. 1983 Dordrecht: Reidel
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Beyer, J.M. Editorial policies and practices among leading journals in four scientific fields. 1978 Sociological Quarterly. 19 68-88
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Biglan, A. Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. 1973 Journal of Applied Psychology. 57 204-213
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Blumenthal, D. ; Campbell, E.G. ; Anderson, M.S. ; Causino, N. ; Louis, K.S. Withholding research results in academic life science – evidence from a national survey of faculty. 1997 JAMA – Journal of the American Medical Association. 277 1224-1228
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bonaccorsi, A. New Forms of complementarity in science. 2010 Minerva. 48 355-387
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Bonaccorsi, A. Search regimes and the industrial dynamics of science. 2008 Minerva. 46 285-315
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Braun, D. The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science. 1998 Research Policy. 27 807-821

  8. Campbell, E.G. ; Weissman, J.S. ; Causino, N. ; Blumenthal, D. Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials. 2000 Research Policy. 29 303-312

  9. Collins, H.M. ; Evans, R. The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. 2002 Social Studies of Science. 32 235-296
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Dempsey, N.P. Stimulated recall interviews in ethnography. 2010 Qualitative Sociology. 33 349-367
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Dirk, L. A measure of originality: the elements of science. 1999 Social Studies of Science. 29 765-776
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Evans, J.A. Industry collaboration, scientific sharing, and the dissemination of knowledge. 2010 Social Studies of Science. 40 757-791
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Feller, I. ; Ailes, C.P. ; Roessner, J.D. Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers. 2002 Research Policy. 31 457-474

  14. Gibbons, M. ; Limoges, C. ; Nowotny, H. ; Schwartzman, S. ; Scott, P. ; Trow, M. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. 1994 SAGE: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Gläser, J. How does Governance change research content? On the possibility of a sociological middle-range theory linking science policy studies to the sociology of scientific knowledge. 2012 The Technical University Technology Studies Working Papers, TUTS-WP-1-2012, Berlin, Technical University: Berlin
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Gläser, J. ; Laudel, G. Identifying individual research trails. 2009 En : Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Gläser, J. ; Laudel, G. Life With and Without Coding: Two Methods for Early-Stage Data Analysis in Qualitative Research Aiming at Causal Explanations [96 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Social Research 14 (2, Art. 5). 2013 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Gläser, J. ; Laudel, G. ; Schimank, U. ; Lange, S. The limits of universality: how field-specific epistemic conditions affect authority relations and their consequences. 2010 En : . Oxford University Press: Oxford
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Grant, J. ; Allen, L. Evaluating high risk research: an assessment of the Wellcome Trust's Sir Henry Wellcome Commemorative Awards for Innovative Research. 1999 Research Evaluation. 8 201-204

  20. Groenewegen, P. ; Peters, L. The emergence and change of materials science and engineering in the United States. 2002 Science, Technology, & Human Values. 27 112-133
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Guetzkow, J. ; Lamont, M. ; Mallard, G. What is originality in the humanities and the social sciences. 2004 American Sociological Review. 69 190-212
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Heinze, T. How to sponsor ground-breaking research: a comparison of funding schemes. 2008 Science and Public Policy. 35 802-818

  23. Heinze, T. ; Shapira, P. ; Rogers, J.D. ; Senker, J.M. Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research. 2009 Research Policy. 38 610-623

  24. Heinze, T. ; Shapira, P. ; Senker, J. ; Kuhlmann, S. Identifying creative research accomplishments: methodology and results for nanotechnology and human genetics. 2007 Scientometrics. 70 125-152

  25. Hollingsworth, J.R. Scientific discoveries: an institutionalist and path-dependent perspective. 2008 En : Hannaway, C. Biomedicine in the Twentieth Century: Practices, Policies, and Politics.. National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, MD
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Horlings, E. ; Gurney, T. Search strategies along the academic lifecycle. 2013 Scientometrics. 94 1137-1160

  27. Ketterle, W. ESI Special Topics: Bose-Einstein Condensates – An Interview with Dr. Wolfgang Ketterle, March 2004. 2004 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Kleinman, D.L. Untangling context: understanding a university laboratory in the commercial world. 1998 Science, Technology, & Human Values. 23 285-314
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Knorr-Cetina, K. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. 1999 Harvard University Press: Cambridge
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Knorr-Cetina, K. Laboratory studies. The cultural approach to the study of science. 1995 En : Jasanoff, S. ; Markle, G.E. ; Petersen, J.C. ; Pinch, T. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. SAGE: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Knorr-Cetina, K. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. 1981 Pergamon Press: Oxford
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 1962 The University of Chicago Press: Chicago
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Lal, B. ; Hughes, M.E. ; Shipp, S. ; Lee, E. ; Amy, C. ; Richards, M. ; Zhu, A. Outcome Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director's Pioneer Award (NDPA), FY 2004–2005. 2011 IDA Science and Technology Policy Institute: Washington
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Lammers, C. Mono-and poly-paradigmatic developments in natural and social sciences. 1974 En : Richard Whitley, Social Processes of Scientific Development. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Laudel, G. ; Gläser, J. Interviewing Scientists. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 3. 2007 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Laudel, G. ; Gläser, J. The ERC's impact on the grantees’ research and their careers (EURECIA, Work package 4 summary report). 2012 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Luukkonen, T. Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: emerging ERC practices. 2012 Research Evaluation. 21 48-60

  38. Martins, H. The Kuhnian ‘Revolution’ and its implications for sociology. 1972 En : Nossiter, T.J. ; Hansson, A.H. ; Stein, R. Imagination and Precision in the Social Sciences. Faber and Faber: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Masterman, M. The nature of a paradigm. 1970 En : Lakatos, I. ; Musgrave, A. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Mayntz, R. ; Schimank, U. Linking theory and practice: introduction. 1998 Research Policy. 27 747-755
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Myers, G. Centering: proposals for an interdisciplinary research-center. 1993 Science, Technology, & Human Values. 18 433-459
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Nagi, S.Z. ; Corwin, R.G. The research enterprise: an overview. 1972 En : Nagi, S.Z. ; Corwin, R.G. The Social Context of Research. Wiley: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Rafols, I. ; Meyer, M. Diversity measures and network centralities as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. 2007 Proceedings of ISSI. 2 631-637
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Riemann, G. A joint project against the backdrop of a research tradition: an introduction to doing biographical research [36 paragraphs]. 2003 Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 4 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Rip, A. The development of restrictedness in the sciences. 1982 En : Elias, N. ; Martins, H. ; Whitley, R. Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies. Reidel: Dordrecht
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Rip, A. The republic of science in the 1990. 1994 Higher Education. 28 3-32
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Schütze, F. Die Technik des narrativen Interviews in Interaktionsfeldstudien—dargestellt an einem Projekt zur Erforschung von kommunalen Machtstrukturen. Arbeitsberichte und Forschungsmaterialien, No. 1. 1977 University of Bielefeld, Department of Sociology:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Solla Price, D.J.d. Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and non-science. 1970 En : Nelson, C.E. ; Pollock, D.K. Communication Among Scientists and Engineers. Heath Lexington: MA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Stelfox, H.T. Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. 2003 The New England Journal of Medicine. 338 101-106
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Storer, N.W. The hard sciences and the soft: some sociological observations. 1967 Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 55 75-84
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Vollmer, H.M. Basic and applied research. 1972 En : Nagi, S.Z. ; Corwin, R.G. The Social Context of Research. Wiley: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Wagner, C.S. ; Alexander, J. Evaluating transformative research programmes: a case study of the NSF Small Grants for Exploratory Research programme. 2013 Research Evaluation. 22 187-197

  53. Whitley, R. Changes in the social and intellectual organisation of the sciences: professionalisation and the arithmetic ideal. 1977 En : Mendelsohn, E. ; Weingart, P. ; Whitley, R. The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge. Reidel: Dordrecht
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Whitley, R. Competition and pluralism in the public sciences: the impact of institutional frameworks on the organisation of academic science. 2003 Research Policy. 32 1015-1029

  55. Whitley, R. How do Institutional changes affect scientific innovations? The effects of shifts in authority relationships, protected space, and flexibility. 2014 En : . Emerald Group: Bingley
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Whitley, R. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. 2000 [1984] Clarendon Press: Oxford
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. New Players, Different Output? A Longitudinal Analysis of Research Dynamics at German Public and Private Universities. (2025). Buechele, Stefan ; Huegel, Matthias ; Kadriu, Valon ; Koenig, Johannes.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:202506.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Research funding in the Middle East and North Africa: analyses of acknowledgments in scientific publications indexed in the Web of Science (2008–2021). (2024). El-Ouahi, Jamal.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-024-04983-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Influence of research on open science in the public policy sphere. (2023). Sastron-Toledo, Pablo ; Filippo, Daniela.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04645-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Missions as boundary objects for transformative change: understanding coordination across policy, research, and stakeholder communities. (2023). Penna, Caetano ; Klerkx, Laurens ; Matthias, K ; Torrens, Jonas ; Wesseling, Joeri ; Janssen, Matthijs J.
    In: Science and Public Policy.
    RePEc:oup:scippl:v:50:y:2023:i:3:p:398-415..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. How scientists interpret and address funding criteria: value creation and undesirable side effects. (2023). Zhang, Jing A ; Haar, Jarrod ; Cunningham, James A ; Okane, Conor.
    In: Small Business Economics.
    RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:61:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11187-022-00697-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Taking the pulse of science diplomacy and developing practices of valuation. (2022). Flink, Tim.
    In: Science and Public Policy.
    RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:2:p:191-200..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Reframing study of research(er) funding towards configurations and trails. (2022). Ramos-Vielba, Irene ; Thomas, Duncan Andrew.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:uty2v.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Interdisciplinary knowledge integration as a unique knowledge source for technology development and the role of funding allocation. (2022). Kwon, Seokbeom.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:181:y:2022:i:c:s004016252200292x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Pork Barrel or Barrel of Gold? Examining the performance implications of earmarking in public R&D grants. (2022). de Faria, Pedro ; Kok, Holmer ; Faems, Dries.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:51:y:2022:i:7:s0048733322000427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Scientists industry engagement and the research agenda: Evidence from Germany. (2021). Pellens, Maikel ; Blandinieres, Florence.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:21001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Incentives, competition, and inequality in markets for creative production. (2021). Riedl, Christoph ; Balietti, Stefano.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:50:y:2021:i:4:s0048733321000160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Pens and purse strings: Exploring the opportunities and limits to funding actionable sustainability science. (2021). Arnott, James C.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:50:y:2021:i:10:s0048733321001591.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Use of classification trees and rule-based models to optimize the funding assignment to research projects: A case study of UTPL. (2021). Lorza, Ruben Lostado ; Martinez, Roberto Fernandez ; Piedra, Nelson ; Santos, Ana Alexandra.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:15:y:2021:i:1:s1751157720306246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Interrelated funding streams in a multi-funder university system: Evidence from the German Exzellenzinitiative. (2020). Buenstorf, Guido ; Koenig, Johannes.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:49:y:2020:i:3:s0048733320300044.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Development strategy and collaboration preference in S&T of enterprises based on funded papers: a case study of Google. (2019). Liang, Zhisen ; Zhao, Rongying.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:121:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03182-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Collaboration and impact of research in different disciplines with international funding (from the EU and other foreign sources). (2019). Morillo, Fernanda.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:120:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03150-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. An analysis of global research funding from subject field and funding agencies perspectives in the G9 countries. (2018). Huang, Mu-Hsuan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:115:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2677-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Using acknowledgement data to characterize funding organizations by the types of research sponsored: the case of robotics research. (2018). Kajikawa, Yuya ; Mejia, Cristian.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:114:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2617-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Translational research in the science policy debate: a comparative analysis of documents. (2018). Blumel, Clemens.
    In: Science and Public Policy.
    RePEc:oup:scippl:v:45:y:2018:i:1:p:24-35..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A Decision Support System for Public Funding of Experimental Development in Energy Research. (2018). Hettesheimer, Tim ; Hirzel, Simon ; Viebahn, Peter ; Fischedick, Manfred.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1357-:d:149123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Confined to a tokenistic status: Social scientists in leadership roles in a national health research funding agency. (2017). Laberge, Suzanne ; Albert, Mathieu .
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:185:y:2017:i:c:p:137-146.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The dynamics of university units as a multi‐level process. Credibility cycles and resource dependencies. (2016). Wise, Michael ; Ingenhoff, Diana ; Lepori, Benedetto ; Buhmann, Alexander.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:109:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2080-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The Emperor’s clothes and the Pied Piper: Bureaucracy and scientific productivity. (2016). Lapuente-Gine, Victor ; Fernandez-Carro, Remo.
    In: Science and Public Policy.
    RePEc:oup:scippl:v:43:y:2016:i:4:p:546-561..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Does massive funding support of researchers work?: Evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative. (2015). Fedderke, Johannes ; Goldschmidt, M..
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:2:p:467-482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Defining the Role of Cognitive Distance in the Peer Review Process: Explorative Study of a Grant Scheme in Infection Biology. (2014). Sandström, Ulf ; Sandstrom, Ulf ; Wang, QI.
    In: INDEK Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:kthind:2014_010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Beyond breakthrough research: Epistemic properties of research and their consequences for research funding. (2014). Glaser, Jochen ; Laudel, Grit.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:43:y:2014:i:7:p:1204-1216.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Policy-making in science policy: The ‘OECD model’ unveiled. (2013). Henriques, Luisa ; Laredo, Philippe.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:42:y:2013:i:3:p:801-816.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Integration of multiple stakeholders in scientific research : A sensemaking-sensegiving approach. (2012). Battard, Nicolas ; Mangematin, Vincent ; Donnelly, Paul.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01514751.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Integration of multiple stakeholders in scientific research : A sensemaking-sensegiving approach. (2012). Battard, Nicolas ; Mangematin, Vincent ; Donnelly, Paul F.
    In: Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print).
    RePEc:hal:gemptp:hal-01514751.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. An analysis of the industry–government–university relationships in Irans power sector: A benchmarking approach. (2012). Hosseini, Seyed Hossein ; Moghadam, Naser Bagheri ; Sahafzadeh, Mahdi .
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:34:y:2012:i:4:p:284-294.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Navigating the impact-innovation double hurdle: The case of a climate change research fund. (2012). Baruch, Yehuda ; Smart, Palie ; Johnson, Mark ; Lettice, Fiona.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:41:y:2012:i:6:p:1048-1057.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology. (2011). Shapira, Philip ; Wang, Jue.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:87:y:2011:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0362-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The Construction of New Indicators for Science and Innovation Policies: The Case of Project Funding Indicators. (2011). Slipersaeter, Stig ; Reale, Emanuela ; Lepori, Benedetto.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:13746_2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Coordination modes in public funding systems. (2011). Lepori, Benedetto.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:40:y:2011:i:3:p:355-367.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. University research funding and publication performance--An international comparison. (2010). Auranen, Otto ; Nieminen, Mika.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:39:y:2010:i:6:p:822-834.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. University Research Management: An Exploratory Literature Review. (2010). Schuetzenmeister, Falk .
    In: Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cdl:bineur:qt77p3j2hr.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Conséquences de la création d’une agence de moyens : le cas de l’ANR. (2006). Gallie, Emilie-Pauline.
    In: Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine.
    RePEc:dau:papers:123456789/5019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Institutionalized biases in the award of research grants: a preliminary analysis revisiting the principle of accumulative advantage. (2004). Green, Rod ; Powell, Philip ; Viner, Neil .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:33:y:2004:i:3:p:443-454.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. The developing role of departments. (2002). Morris, Norma .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:31:y:2002:i:5:p:817-833.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Forms of research organisation and their responsiveness to external goal setting. (2000). Wilts, Arnold.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:29:y:2000:i:6:p:767-781.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 12:30:08 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.