Alekseev, A. ; Charness, G. ; Gneezy, U. Experimental methods: When and why contextual instructions are important. 2017 Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization. 134 48-59
Amador-Hidalgo, L. ; Brañas-Garza, P. ; Espín, A.M. ; García-Muñoz, T. ; Hernández-Román, A. Cognitive abilities and risk-taking: Errors, not preferences. 2021 European Economic Review. 134 1-17
Andersson, O. ; Holm, H.J. ; Tyran, J.-R. ; Wengström, E. Risk aversion relates to cognitive ability: Preferences or noise?. 2016 Journal of the European Economic Association. 14 1129-1154
Andersson, O. ; Holm, H.J. ; Tyran, J.-R. ; Wengström, E. Robust inference in risk elicitation tasks. 2020 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 61 195-209
- Barreda-Tarrazona, I. ; Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, A. ; Navarro-Martínez, D. ; Sabater-Grande, G. Risk attitude elicitation using a multi-lottery choice task: Real vs. hypothetical incentives. 2011 Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting. 40 613-628
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bellemare, C. ; Shearer, B. Sorting, incentives and risk preferences: Evidence from a field experiment. 2010 Economics Letters. 108 345-348
- Benjamin, D. ; Brown, S. ; Shapiro, J. Who is ’behavioral’? cognitive ability and anomalous preferences. 2013 Journal of the European Economic Association. 11 1231-1255
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Binswanger, H.P. Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. 1980 American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 62 395-407
Bosch-Domènech, A. ; Silvestre, J. Measuring risk aversion with lists: A new bias. 2013 Theory and Decision. 75 465-496
Brañas-Garza, P. ; Estepa-Mohedano, L. ; Jorrat, D. ; Orozco, V. ; Rascón-Ramírez, E. To pay or not to pay: Measuring risk preferences in lab and field. 2021 Judgement and Decision Making. 16 1290-1313
Camerer, C.F. ; Hogarth, R. The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. 1999 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 19 7-42
- Camerer, C.F. ; Loewenstein, G. ; Rabin, M. Advances in behavioral economics. 2004 Princeton University Press:
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Carbone, E. ; Hey, J. Which error story is best?. 2000 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 20 161-176
Charness, G. ; Gneezy, U. ; Imas, A. Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. 2013 Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization. 87 43-51
Charness, G. ; Viceisza, A. Three risk-elicitation methods in the field-evidence from rural senegal. 2016 Review of Behavioral Economics. 3 145-171
- Cleveland, W.S. ; Harris, C.S. ; McGill, R. Human factors and behavioral science: Experiments on quantitative judgments of graphs and maps. 1983 The Bell System Technical Journal. 62 1659-1674
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cleveland, W.S. ; Harris, C.S. ; McGill, R. Judgments of circle sizes on statistical maps. 1982 Journal of the American Statistical Association. 77 541-547
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cleveland, W.S. ; McGill, R. Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. 1984 Journal of the American Statistical Association. 79 531-554
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Csermely, T. ; Rabas, A. How to reveal people’s preferences: Comparing time consistency and predictive power of multiple price list risk elicitation methods. 2016 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 53 107-136
Dave, C. ; Eckel, C.C. ; Johnson, C.A. ; Rojas, C. Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better?. 2010 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 41 219-243
Dohmen, T. ; Falk, A. ; Huffman, D. ; Sunde, U. On the relationship between cognitive ability and risk preference. 2018 Journal of Economic Perspectives. 32 115-134
Drichoutis, A. ; Lusk, J. What can multiple price lists really tell us about risk preferences?. 2016 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 53 89-106
Eckel, C.C. ; Grossman, P.J. Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. 2008 Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization. 68 1-17
- Espinosa, M.P. ; Ezquerra, L. The effect of domain and framing on elicited risk aversion. 2022 PLoS One. 17 -
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Etchart-Vincent, N. ; l’Haridon, O. Monetary incentives in the loss domain and behavior toward risk: An experimental comparison of three reward schemes including real losses. 2011 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 42 61-83
- Fontanari, L. ; Gonzalez, M. ; Vallortigara, G. ; Girotto, V. Probabilistic cognition in two indigenous Mayan groups. 2014 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111 17075-17080
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gegax, D. ; Gerking, S. ; Schulze, W. Perceived risk and the marginal value of safety. 1991 The Review of Economics and Statistics. 73 589-596
Gerking, S. ; De Haan, M. ; Schulze, W. The marginal value of job safety: A contingent valuation study. 1988 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1 185-199
- Harrison, G.W. Maximum likelihood estimation of utility functions using Stata. 2008 University of Central Florida:
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Harrison, G.W. ; Rutström, E.E. Risk aversion in the laboratory. 2008 Research in Experimental Economics. 12 41-196
Herranz-Zarzoso, N. ; Sabater-Grande, G. ; Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, A. Framing and repetition effects on risky choices: A behavioural approach. 2020 Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 84 -
Hill, R.V. ; Viceisza, A. A field experiment on the impact of weather shocks and insurance on risky investment. 2012 Experimental Economics. 15 341-371
Hirschauer, N. ; Musshoff, O. ; Maart-Noelck, S.C. ; Gruener, S. Eliciting risk attitudes–how to avoid mean and variance bias in Holt-and-Laury lotteries. 2014 Applied Economics Letters. 21 35-38
Holt, C.A. ; Laury, S.K. Risk aversion and incentive effects: New data without order effects. 2005 The American Economic Review. 95 902-912
Holt, C.A. ; Laury, S.K. Risk aversion and incentive effects. 2002 The American Economic Review. 92 1644-1655
- Iyer, P. ; Hirsch, S. ; Meraner, M. ; Finger, R. Measuring farmer risk preferences in europe: A systematic review. 2019 Journal of Agricultural Economics. 71 3-26
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jacobson, S. ; Petrie, R. Learning from mistakes: What do inconsistent choices over risk tell us?. 2009 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 38 143-158
Krupnick, A. ; Alberini, A. ; Cropper, M. ; Simon, N. ; O’Brien, B. ; Goeree, R. Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: A contingent valuation survey of ontario residents. 2002 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 24 161-186
Kühberger, A. ; Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. ; Perner, J. Framing decisions: Hypothetical and real. 2002 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 89 1162-1175
Levitt, S.D. ; List, J.A. What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?. 2007 Journal of Economic Perspectives. 21 153-174
Lévy-Garboua, L. ; Maafi, H. ; Masclet, D. ; Terracol, A. Risk aversion and framing effects. 2012 Experimental Economics. 15 128-144
Loomes, G. ; Moffatt, P. ; Sudgen, R. A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories of risky choice. 2002 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 24 103-130
- Luce, R. . 1959 En : Arrow, K.J. ; Karlin, S. ; Suppes, P. Response latencies and probabilities. Stanford University Press:
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Meraner, M. ; Musshoff, O. ; Finger, R. Using involvement to reduce inconsistencies in risk preference elicitation. 2018 Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 73 22-33
Rommel, J. ; Hermann, D. ; Müller, M. ; Mußhoff, O. Comprehension in risk elicitation experiments. 2017 Applied Economics Letters. 24 627-634
Rommel, J. ; Hermann, D. ; Müller, M. ; Mußhoff, O. Contextual framing and monetary incentives in field experiments on risk preferences: Evidence from german farmers. 2019 Journal of Agricultural Economics. 70 408-425
Taylor, M. Bias and brains: Risk aversion and cognitive ability across real and hypothetical settings. 2013 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 46 299-320
Wiseman, D.B. ; Levin, I.P. Comparing risky decision making under conditions of real and hypothetical consequences. 1996 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 66 241-250