create a website

A criticism of Bernheim & Sprengers (2020) tests of rank dependence. (2023). Wakker, Peter.
In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
RePEc:eee:soceco:v:107:y:2023:i:c:s2214804322001215.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 88

References cited by this document

Cocites: 23

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abdellaoui, M. ; Li, C. ; Wakker, P.P. ; Wu, G. A defense of prospect theory in Bernheim & Sprenger's experiment. 2020 Mimeo. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Ariely, D. ; Loewenstein, G.F. ; Prelec, D. ‘Coherent arbitrariness’: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. 2001 Quarterly Journal of Economics. 118 73-106
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Armantier, O. ; Treich, N. The rich domain of risk. 2016 Management Science. 62 1954-1969

  4. Barberis, N.C. Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment. 2013 Journal of Economic Perspectives. 27 173-195

  5. Bateman, I.J. ; Munro, A. ; Rhodes, B. ; Starmer, C. ; Sugden, R. Does part-whole bias exist? An experimental investigation. 1997 Economic Journal. 107 322-332

  6. Bernasconi, M. Nonlinear preference and two-stage lotteries: Theories and evidence. 1994 Economic Journal. 104 54-70

  7. Bernheim, B.D. ; Royer, R. ; Sprenger, C. Robustness of rank independence in risky choice. 2022 AEA Papers and Proceedings. 112 415-420

  8. Bernheim, B.D. ; Sprenger, C. On the empirical validity of cumulative prospect theory: Experimental evidence of rank-independent probability weighting. 2020 Econometrica. 88 1363-1409

  9. Birnbaum, M.H. Causes of Allais common consequence paradoxes: An experimental dissection. 2004 Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 48 87-106
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Birnbaum, M.H. New paradoxes of risky decision making. 2008 Psychological Review. 115 463-501
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Birnbaum, M.H. Tests of branch splitting and branch-splitting independence in Allais paradoxes with positive and mixed consequences. 2007 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 102 154-173

  12. Birnbaum, M.H. Three new tests of independence that differentiate models of risky decision making. 2005 Management Science. 51 1346-1358

  13. Birnbaum, M.H. ; McIntosh, W.R. Violations of branch independence in choices between gambles. 1996 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 67 91-110

  14. Birnbaum, M.H. ; Schmidt, U. ; Schneider, M.D. Testing independence conditions in the presence of errors and splitting effects. 2017 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 54 61-85

  15. Blondel, S. Testing theories of choice under risk: Estimation of individual functionals. 2002 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 24 251-265

  16. Bruce, A.C. ; Johnson, J.E.V. Decision-making under risk: The effect of complexity on performance. 1996 Psychological Reports. 79 67-76
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Camerer, C.F. ; Ho, T.H. Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. 1994 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 8 167-196

  18. Cohen, M. ; Jaffray, J.Y. Certainty effect versus probability distortion: An experimental analysis of decision making under risk. 1988 Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 14 554-560
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Dean, M. ; Ortoleva, P. Allais, Ellsberg, and preferences for hedging. 2017 Theoretical Economics. 12 377-424

  20. Diecidue, E. ; Wakker, P.P. ; Zeelenberg, M. Eliciting decision weights by adapting de Finetti's betting-odds method to prospect theory. 2007 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 34 179-199

  21. Edwards, K.D. Prospect theory: A literature review. 1996 International Review of Financial Analysis. 5 18-38

  22. Erev, I. ; Ert, E. ; Plonsky, O. ; Cohen, D. ; Cohen, O. From anomalies to forecasts: Toward a descriptive model of decisions under risk, under ambiguity, and from experience. 2017 Psychological Review. 124 369-409
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Fehr-Duda, H. ; Epper, T. Probability and risk: Foundations and economic implications of probability-dependent risk preferences. 2012 Annual Review of Economics. 4 567-593

  24. Fennema, H. ; Wakker, P.P. A test of rank-dependent utility in the context of ambiguity. 1996 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 13 19-35

  25. Fennema, H. ; Wakker, P.P. Original and cumulative prospect theory: A discussion of empirical differences. 1997 Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 10 53-64
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Fishburn, P.C. On Handa's “new theory of cardinal utility” and the maximization of expected return. 1978 Journal of Political Economy. 86 321-324
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Fudenberg, D. ; Puri, I. Simplicity and probability weighting in choice under risk. 2022 AEA Papers and Proceedings. 112 421-425

  28. Gonzalez, R. ; Wu, G. Composition rules in original and cumulative prospect theory. 2022 Theory and Decision. 92 647-675
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Greenland, S. ; Senn, S.J. ; Rothman, K.J. ; Carlin, J.B. ; Poole, C. ; Goodman, S.N. Statistical tests, p values, confidence intervals, and power: A guide to misinterpretations. 2016 European Journal of Epidemiology. 31 337-350
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Hirshman, S.D., & Wu, G. (2022). Tests of rank-dependent probability weighting in risky choice. in preparation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Huck, S. ; Weizsäcker, G. Risk, complexity, and deviations from expected-value maximization: Results of a lottery choice experiment. 1999 Journal of Economic Psychology. 20 699-715

  32. Humphrey, S.J. Are event-splitting effects actually boundary effects?. 2001 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 22 79-93

  33. Humphrey, S.J. Does learning diminish violations of independence, coalescing and monotonicity?. 2006 Theory and Decision. 61 93-128

  34. Humphrey, S.J. Non-transitive choice: Event-splitting effects or framing effects?. 2001 Economica. 68 77-96

  35. Humphrey, S.J. Regret aversion or event-splitting effects? More evidence under risk and uncertainty. 1995 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 11 263-274

  36. Humphrey, S.J. The common consequence effect: Testing a unified explanation of recent mixed evidence. 2000 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 41 239-263

  37. Humphrey, S.J. ; Verschoor, A. Decision-making under risk among small farmers in East Uganda. 2004 Journal of African Economies. 13 44-101

  38. Iyengar, S.S. ; Kamenica, E. Choice proliferation, simplicity seeking, and asset allocation. 2010 Journal of Public Economics. 94 530-539

  39. Iyengar, S.S. ; Lepper, M.R. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?”. 2000 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 79 995-1006
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Iyengar, S.S., Jiang, W., & Huberman, G. (2003). How much choice is too much: Contributions to 401(k) Retirement plans. Pension Research Council Working Paper 2003-10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Kahneman, D. ; Tversky, A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. 1979 Econometrica. 47 263-291

  42. Kovarik, J. ; Levin, D. ; Wang, T. Ellsberg paradox: Ambiguity and complexity aversions compared. 2016 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 52 47-64

  43. Krantz, D.H. ; Luce, R.D. ; Suppes, P. ; Tversky, A. “Foundations of measurement, vol. i (Additive and polynomial representations). 1971 Academic Press: New York
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. L'Haridon, O. Behavior in the loss domain: An experiment using the probability trade-off consistency condition. 2009 Journal of Economic Psychology. 30 540-551

  45. l'Haridon, O. ; Placido, L. Betting on Machina's reflection example: An experiment on ambiguity. 2010 Theory and Decision. 69 375-393

  46. l'Haridon, O. ; Vieider, F. All over the map: A worldwide comparison of risk preferences. 2019 Quantitative Economics. 10 185-215

  47. Levy, H. First degree stochastic dominance violations: Decision weights and bounded rationality. 2008 Economic Journal. 118 759-774

  48. Loehman, E. Testing risk aversion and nonexpected utility theories. 1998 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 33 285-302

  49. Loomes, G. ; Starmer, C. ; Sugden, R. Do anomalies disappear in repeated markets?. 2003 Economic Journal. 113 C153-C166

  50. Lopes, L.L. ; Oden, G.C. The role of aspiration level in risky choice: A comparison of cumulative prospect theory and SP/A theory. 1999 Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 43 286-313
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Luce, R.D. Utility of gains and losses: measurement-theoretical and experimental approaches. 2000 Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Luce, R.D., & Suppes, P. (1965). Preference, utility, and subjective probability. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, Vol. III, 249–410. New York, Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Machina, M.J. Risk, ambiguity, and the rank-dependence axioms. 2009 American Economic Review. 99 385-392

  54. Mador, G. ; Sonsino, D. ; Benzion, U. On complexity and lotteries’ evaluations — Three experimental observations. 2000 Journal of Economic Psychology. 21 625-637
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Moffatt, P.G. ; Sitzia, S. ; Zizzo, D.J. Heterogeneity in preferences towards complexity. 2015 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 51 147-170

  56. Murphy, R.O. ; ten Brincke, R.H.W. Hierarchical maximum likelihood parameter estimation for cumulative prospect theory: Improving the reliability of individual risk parameter estimates. 2018 Management Science. 64 308-326

  57. Neilson, W.S. Some mixed results on boundary effects. 1992 Economics Letters. 39 275-278

  58. Nilsson, H. ; Rieskamp, J. ; Wagenmakers, E.J. Commentary: Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation for cumulative prospect theory. 2020 Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 98 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Pachur, T. ; Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. ; Murphy, R.O. ; Hertwig, R. Prospect theory reflects selective allocation of attention. 2018 Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 147 147-169
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Paradı́s, J. ; Viader, P. ; Bibiloni, L. The derivative of Minkowski's ?(x) function. 2001 Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 253 107-125
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Peterson, J.C. ; Bourgin, D.D. ; Agrawal, M. ; Reichman, D. ; Griffiths, T.L. Using large-scale experiments and machine learning to discover theories of human decision-making. 2021 Science. 372 1209-1214
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Quiggin, J. A theory of anticipated utility. 1982 Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization. 3 323-343

  63. Rieger, M.O. ; Wang, M. Prospect theory for continuous distributions. 2008 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 36 83-102

  64. Ruggeri, K. ; Alí, S. ; Berge, M.L. Replicating patterns of prospect theory for decision under risk. 2020 Nature Human Behavior. 4 622-633

  65. Samuelson, P.A. The St. Petersburg paradox as a divergent double limit. 1960 International Economic Review. 1 31-37
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Schmeidler, D. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. 1989 Econometrica. 57 571-587

  67. Schmeidler, D. Subjective probability without additivity. foerder institut of economic research. 1982 Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv: Israel
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Schmidt, U. ; Seidl, C. Reconsidering the common ratio effect: The roles of compound independence, reduction, and coalescing. 2014 Theory and Decision. 77 323-339

  69. Schneider, S.L. ; Lopes, L.L. Reflection in preferences under risk: Who and when may suggest why. 1986 Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 12 535-548
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Smith, V.L. Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. 1982 American Economic Review. 72 923-955

  71. Sonsino, D. ; Benzion, U. ; Mador, G. The complexity effects on choice with uncertainty—Experimental evidence. 2002 Economic Journal. 112 936-965

  72. Sonsino, D. ; Mandelbaum, M. On preference for flexibility and complexity aversion: Experimental evidence. 2001 Theory and Decision. 51 197-216

  73. Starmer, C. Cycling with rules of thumb: An experimental test for a new form of non-transitive behavior. 1999 Theory and Decision. 46 141-158

  74. Starmer, C. Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. 2000 Journal of Economic Literature. 38 332-382

  75. Starmer, C. ; Sugden, R. Testing for juxtaposition and event-splitting effects. 1993 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 6 235-254

  76. Stodder, J. Complexity aversion: Simplification in the Herrnstein and Allais behaviors. 1997 Eastern Economic Journal. 23 1-15

  77. Tversky, A. ; Kahneman, D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. 1992 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 5 297-323

  78. Tversky, A. ; Koehler, D.J. Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. 1994 Psychological Review. 101 547-567
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Wakker, P.P. Prospect theory: For risk and ambiguity. 2010 Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Wakker, P.P. The correct formula of 1979 prospect theory for multiple outcomes. 2023 Theory and Decision. 94 183-187

  81. Wakker, P.P. ; Erev, I. ; Weber, E.U. Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories. 1994 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 9 195-230

  82. Wakker, P.P. (2022)., “Annotated bibliography. http://personal.eur.nl/wakker/refs/webrfrncs.docx.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Weber, B.J. The effects of losses and event splitting on the Allais paradox. Judgement in decision making. 2007 Judgment and Decision Making. 2 115-125

  84. Weber, E.U. ; Kirsner, B. Reasons for rank-dependent utility evaluation. 1997 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 14 41-61

  85. Weber, M. ; Eisenführ, F. ; von Winterfeldt, D. The effects of splitting attributes on weights in multiattribute utility measurement. 1988 Management Science. 34 431-445

  86. Wilcox, N.T. Lottery choice: Incentives, complexity and decision time. 1993 Economic Journal. 103 1397-1417

  87. Wu, G. An empirical test of ordinal independence. 1994 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 9 39-60

  88. Wu, G. ; Zhang, J. ; Abdellaoui, M. Testing prospect theories using tradeoff consistency. 2005 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 30 107-131

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Source Theory : A Tractable and Positive Ambiguity Theory. (2025). Wakker, Peter ; Li, Chen ; Baillon, Aurlien ; Bleichrodt, Han.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04964898.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. On the psychological foundations of ambiguity and compound risk aversion. (2024). Wu, Keyu ; Fehr, Ernst ; Schonger, Martin ; Hofland, Sean.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:444.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. On the Psychological Foundations of Ambiguity and Compound Risk Aversion. (2024). Fehr, Ernst ; Hofland, Sean ; Schonger, Martin ; Wu, Keyu.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17032.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Ambiguity Box: A new tool to generate ambiguity in the lab. (2024). Morone, Andrea ; Caferra, Rocco.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:113:y:2024:i:c:s2214804324001368.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Complexity aversion in risky choices and valuations: Moderators and possible causes. (2024). Oberholzer, Yvonne ; Olschewski, Sebastian ; Scheibehenne, Benjamin.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:100:y:2024:i:c:s016748702300082x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. On the Psychological Foundations of Ambiguity and Compound Risk Aversion. (2024). Fehr, Ernst ; Hofland, Sean ; Schonger, Martin ; Wu, Keyu.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11150.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. More Ambiguous or More Complex? An Investigation of Individual Preferences under Uncertainty.. (2023). Berger, Loïc ; Theroude, Vincent ; Aydogan, Ilke.
    In: Working Papers of BETA.
    RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2023-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. More Ambiguous or More Complex? An Investigation of Individual Preferences under Model Uncertainty. (2023). Berger, Loïc ; Theroude, Vincent ; Aydogan, Ilke.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ies:wpaper:e202303.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. UNRAVELING AMBIGUITY AVERSION. (2023). Bosetti, Valentina ; Berger, Loïc ; Aydogan, Ilke.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ies:wpaper:e202301.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Unraveling Ambiguity Aversion. (2023). Bosetti, Valentina ; Berger, Loic ; Aydogan, Ilke.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04071242.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Unraveling Ambiguity Aversion. (2023). Bosetti, Valentina ; Berger, Loïc ; Aydogan, Ilke.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04071242.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. A criticism of Bernheim & Sprengers (2020) tests of rank dependence. (2023). Wakker, Peter.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:107:y:2023:i:c:s2214804322001215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Majority Rule Determination and Uncertainty Aversion: A Critical Systematic Review. (2023). Papini, Giulia.
    In: Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy.
    RePEc:beh:jbepv1:v:7:y:2023:i:1:p:19-24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Ignorance illusion in decisions under risk: The impact of perceived expertise on probability weighting. (2022). Goeddemenke, Michael ; Baars, Maren.
    In: Journal of Risk & Insurance.
    RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:89:y:2022:i:1:p:35-62.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A tale of two ambiguities: A conceptual overview of findings from economics and psychology. (2022). Borozan, Milo ; Cannito, Loreta ; Luppi, Barbara.
    In: Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy.
    RePEc:beh:jbepv1:v:6:y:2022:i:s1:p:11-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The Rich Domain of Ambiguity Explored. (2018). Wakker, Peter ; Li, Zhihua ; Wang, Tong V ; Muller, Julia.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:64:y:2018:i:7:p:3227-3240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Three layers of uncertainty: an experiment. (2018). Bosetti, Valentina ; Berger, Loïc ; Liu, Ning ; Aydogan, Ilke.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Three Layers of Uncertainty: an Experiment. (2018). Bosetti, Valentina ; Liu, Ning ; Berger, Loc ; Aydogan, Ilke.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2018.24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. How do people reduce compound lotteries?. (2018). Hajimoladarvish, Narges.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:75:y:2018:i:c:p:126-133.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Advantageous Selection in Insurance Markets with Compound Risk. (2017). Huang, Rachel ; Tzeng, Larry Y ; Snow, Arthur.
    In: The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review.
    RePEc:pal:genrir:v:42:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1057_s10713-017-0023-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Advantageous Selection in Insurance Markets with Compound Risk. (2017). Huang, Rachel ; Tzeng, Larry Y ; Snow, Arthur.
    In: The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory.
    RePEc:kap:geneva:v:42:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1057_s10713-017-0023-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The Value of Cancer Prevention vs Treatment. (2016). Rheinberger, Christoph ; Herrera-Araujo, Daniel ; Hammitt, James.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:30267.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The value of disease prevention vs treatment. (2016). Rheinberger, Christoph ; Herrera-Araujo, Daniel ; Hammitt, James.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:50:y:2016:i:c:p:247-255.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-21 19:16:23 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.