create a website

Selection into experiments: New evidence on the role of preferences, cognition, and recruitment protocols. (2022). Thöni, Christian ; Thiemann, Petra ; Sunde, Uwe ; Schulz, Jonathan ; Thoni, Christian.
In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
RePEc:eee:soceco:v:98:y:2022:i:c:s2214804322000465.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 38

References cited by this document

Cocites: 45

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. “The risks cannot be compensated”: The willingness to donate DNA for science and its relationship with economic preferences. (2025). Jain, Manisha ; Linnr, Richard Karlsson.
    In: Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique.
    RePEc:wly:canjec:v:58:y:2025:i:2:p:515-547.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abeler, J. ; Nosenzo, D. Self-selection into laboratory experiments: Pro-social motives vs. monetary incentives. 2015 Experimental Economics. 18 195-214

  2. Alexeev, A. ; Freer, M. Selection in the lab: A network approach. 2019 Working Paper. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Andersen, S. ; Harrison, G.W. ; Lau, M.I. ; Rutström, E.E. Preference heterogeneity in experiments: Comparing the field and laboratory. 2010 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 73 209-224

  4. Anderson, J. ; Burks, S.V. ; Carpenter, J. ; Götte, L. ; Maurer, K. ; Nosenzo, D. ; Rusticchini, A. Self-selection and variations in the laboratory measurement of other-regarding preferences across subject pools: Evidence from one college student and two adult samples. 2013 Experimental Economics. 16 170-189

  5. Arechar, A.A. ; Gächter, S. ; Molleman, L. Conducting interactive experiments online. 2018 Experimental Economics. 21 99-131

  6. Benndorf, V. ; Moellers, C. ; Normann, H.-T. Experienced vs. inexperienced participants in the lab: Do they behave differently?. 2017 Journal of the Economic Science Association. 3 12-25

  7. Berg, J. ; Dickhaut, J. ; McCabe, K. Trust, reciprocity and social history. 1995 Games and Economic Behavior. 10 122-142

  8. Brañas Garza, P. ; Kujal, P. ; Lenkei, B. Cognitive reflection test: Whom, how, when. 2019 Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 82 -

  9. Brañas-Garza, P. ; Kovarik, J. ; Lopez, M.C. No moral wiggles in € 5 and € 1000 dictator games under ambiguity. 2020 Manuscript. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Brosig, J. ; Riechmann, T. ; Weimann, J. Selfish in the end? An investigation of consistency and stability of individual behavior. 2007 :

  11. Charness, G. ; Gneezy, U. ; Halladay, B. Experimental methods: Pay one or pay all. 2016 Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 131 141-150

  12. Cleave, B.L. ; Nikiforakis, N. ; Slonim, R. Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences. 2013 Experimental Economics. 16 372-382

  13. Clot, S. ; Grolleau, G. ; Ibanez, L. Shall we pay all? an experimental test of random incentivized systems. 2018 Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 73 93-98

  14. Dohmen, T. ; Falk, A. ; Huffman, D. ; Sunde, U. Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability?. 2010 American Economic Review. 100 1238-1260

  15. Engel, C. Dictator games: A meta study. 2011 Experimental Economics. 14 583-610

  16. Ewers, M. ; Zimmermann, F. Image and misreporting. 2015 Journal of the European Economic Association. 13 363-380

  17. Exadaktylos, F. ; Espin, A.M. ; Brañas-Garza, P. Experimental subjects are not different. 2013 Nature: Scientific Report. 1213 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Falk, A. ; Becker, A. ; Dohmen, T. ; Enke, B. ; Huffman, D. ; Sunde, U. Global evidence on economic preferences. 2018 Quarterly Journal of Economics. 133 1645-1692

  19. Falk, A. ; Heckman, J.J. Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. 2009 Science. 326 535-538

  20. Falk, A. ; Meier, S. ; Zehnder, C. Do lab experiments misrepresent social preferences? The case of self-selected student samples. 2014 Journal of the European Economic Association. 11 839-852
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Frederick, S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. 2005 Journal of Economic Perspectives. 19 25-42

  22. Gneezy, U. ; Potters, J. An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. 1997 Quarterly Journal of Economics. 112 631-645

  23. Greiner, B. Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. 2015 Journal of the Economic Science Association. 1 114-125

  24. Guillen, P. ; Veszteg, R.F. On “lab rats”. 2012 Journal of Socio-Economics. 41 714-720
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Harrison, G.W. ; Lau, M.I. ; Rutström, E.E. Risk attitudes, randomization to treatment, and self-selection into experiments. 2009 Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 70 498-507

  26. Harrison, G.W. ; Lau, M.I. ; Yoo, H.I. Risk attitudes, sample selection, and attrition in a longitudinal field experiment. 2020 Review of Economics and Statistics. 102 552-568

  27. Krawczyk, M. What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment. 2011 Experimental Economics. 14 482-489

  28. Lazear, E.P. ; Malmendier, U. ; Weber, R.A. Sorting in experiments with application to social preferences. 2012 American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 4 136-163

  29. Matthey, A. ; Regner, T. On the independence of history: Experience spill-overs between experiments. 2013 Theory and Decision. 75 403-419

  30. Santos-Pinto, L. ; de la Rosa, L.E. Overconfidence in labor market. 2020 En : Zimmermann, K. Handbook of labor, human resources and population economics. Springer:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Schulz, J. ; Sunde, U. ; Thiemann, P. ; Thöni, C. Selection into experiments: Evidence from a population of students. 2019 CeDEx Discussion Paper No. 2019-09:

  32. Schulz, J.F. ; Thiemann, P. ; Thöni, C. Nudging generosity: Choice architecture and cognitive factors in charitable giving. 2018 Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 74 139-145

  33. Schulz, J.F. ; Thöni, C. Overconfidence and career choice. 2016 PloS one. 11 e0145126-

  34. Slonim, R. ; Wang, C. ; Garbarino, E. ; Merret, D. Opting-in: Participation bias in economic experiments. 2013 Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 90 43-70

  35. Snowberg, E. ; Yaariv, L. Testing the waters: Behavior across participant pools. 2021 American Economic Review. 111 687-719

  36. Toplak, M.E. ; West, R.F. ; Stanovich, K.E. The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. 2011 Memory and Cognition. 39 1275-1289
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Volk, S. ; Thöni, C. ; Ruigrok, W. Temporal stability and psychological foundations of cooperation preferences. 2012 Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 81 664-676

  38. von Gaudecker, H.-M. ; van Soest, A. ; Wengström, E. Experts in experiments. 2012 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 45 159-190

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. New Categories of Conditional Contribution Strategies in the Public Goods Game. (2025). Krl, Adrienn ; Schffer, Klaudia ; Kun, DM.
    In: Games.
    RePEc:gam:jgames:v:16:y:2025:i:3:p:22-:d:1649724.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Social preferences across subject pools: students vs. general population. (2024). Senn, Julien ; Fehr, Ernst ; Epper, Thomas.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:435.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. How Malleable Are Pro-environmental Preferences? Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment. (2024). Menta, Giorgia ; Verheyden, Bertrand ; Piccari, Michela.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17578.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Missing Type: Where Are the Inequality Averse (Students)?. (2024). Fehr, Ernst ; Epper, Thomas ; Senn, Julien.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp16865.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Social Preferences Across Subject Pools: Students vs. General Population. (2024). Fehr, Ernst ; Epper, Thomas ; Senn, Julien.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ies:wpaper:e202401.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The Missing Type: Where Are the Inequality Averse (Students)?. (2024). Fehr, Ernst ; Epper, Thomas ; Senn, Julien.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Laboratory experiments. (2023). Przepiorka, Wojtek.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:9cxq2_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Laboratory experiments. (2023). Przepiorka, Wojtek.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:9cxq2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Social Preferences of Young Professionals and the Financial Industry. (2023). Sutter, Matthias ; Heinz, Matthias ; Schumacher, Heiner ; Gill, Andrej.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:7:p:3905-3919.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The Missing Type: Where Are the Inequality Averse (Students)?. (2023). Fehr, Ernst ; Epper, Thomas ; Senn, Julien.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ies:wpaper:e202309.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Don’t pay the highly motivated too much. (2023). Lancsar, Emily ; Dorner, Zack.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:103:y:2023:i:c:s2214804322001422.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Competition, subjective feedback, and gender gaps in performance. (2023). Szabo-Morvai, Agnes ; Lovasz, Anna ; Cukrowska-Torzewska, Ewa ; Rigo, Mariann ; Bat-Erdene, Boldmaa.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:102:y:2023:i:c:s2214804322001252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Portfolio instability and socially responsible investment: Experiments with financial professionals and students. (2023). Willinger, Marc ; Duchene, Sebastien ; Sentis, Patrick ; Tatarnikova, Olga.
    In: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control.
    RePEc:eee:dyncon:v:153:y:2023:i:c:s0165188923001082.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Selection into experiments: New evidence on the role of preferences, cognition, and recruitment protocols. (2022). Thöni, Christian ; Thiemann, Petra ; Sunde, Uwe ; Schulz, Jonathan ; Thoni, Christian.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:98:y:2022:i:c:s2214804322000465.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Incentives in experimental economics. (2021). Azar, Ofer ; Voslinsky, Alisa.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:93:y:2021:i:c:s221480432100046x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Addressing validity and generalizability concerns in field experiments. (2020). Wagner, Valentin ; Schneider, Sebastian ; Riener, Gerhard.
    In: DICE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:dicedp:345.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Does selection bias cause us to overestimate gender differences in competitiveness?. (2020). Stoop, Jan ; Nikiforakis, Nikos ; Dariel, Aurelie.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:nad:wpaper:20200046.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Addressing Validity and Generalizability Concerns in Field Experiments. (2020). Wagner, Valentin ; Schneider, Sebastian ; Riener, Gerhard.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:jgu:wpaper:2019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Self-selection bias in a field experiment: Recruiting subjects under different payment schemes. (2020). Herranz-Zarzoso, Noemi ; Sabater-Grande, Gerardo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:jau:wpaper:2020/13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Norms in the lab: Inexperienced versus experienced participants. (2020). Schwieren, Christiane ; Schmidt, Robert ; Sproten, Alec N.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:173:y:2020:i:c:p:239-255.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Distributive Preferences of Public Representatives: A Field-in-the-Lab Experiment. (2019). Leprince, Matthieu ; Pourieux, Matthieu ; Denant-Boemont, Laurent.
    In: Economics Working Paper from Condorcet Center for political Economy at CREM-CNRS.
    RePEc:tut:cccrwp:2019-05-ccr.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Selection into Experiments: Evidence from a Population of Students. (2019). Thöni, Christian ; Thiemann, Petra ; Sunde, Uwe ; Schulz, Jonathan ; Thoeni, Christian.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:not:notcdx:2019-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Selection into Experiments: Evidence from a Population of Students. (2019). Thöni, Christian ; Thiemann, Petra ; Sunde, Uwe ; Schulz, Jonathan ; Thoni, Christian.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12807.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study. (2019). Galizzi, Matteo ; Navarro-Martinez, Daniel.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:3:p:976-1002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Wage Elasticities in Working and Volunteering: The Role of Reference Points in a Laboratory Study. (2019). Terry, Stephen ; Exley, Christine L.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:1:p:413-425.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Selection into Experiments: Evidence from a Population of Students. (2019). Thöni, Christian ; Thiemann, Petra ; Sunde, Uwe ; Schulz, Jonathan ; Thoni, Christian.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2019_018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. On the external validity of social preference games: a systematic lab-field study. (2019). Galizzi, Matteo ; Navarro-Martinez, Daniel.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:84088.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Using a structured collaborative learning approach in a case-based management accounting course. (2019). Tan, Hwee Cheng.
    In: Journal of Accounting Education.
    RePEc:eee:joaced:v:49:y:2019:i:c:s0748575118301957.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Norms in the lab: Inexperienced versus experienced participants. (2019). Schwieren, Christiane ; Schmidt, Robert J ; Sproten, Alec N.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Digit ratio (2D:4D) predicts pro-social behavior in economic games only for unsatisfied individuals. (2018). Kovářík, Jaromír ; Espín, Antonio ; Brañas-Garza, Pablo ; Garcia, Teresa ; Braas-Garza, Pablo ; Kovaik, Jaromir ; Espin, Antonio M.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:86166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Conducting interactive experiments online. (2018). Gächter, Simon ; Gachter, Simon ; Molleman, Lucas ; Arechar, Antonio A.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:21:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10683-017-9527-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Cooperation stability: A representative sample in the lab. (2018). Fosgaard, Toke R.
    In: IFRO Working Paper.
    RePEc:foi:wpaper:2018_08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Conditional cooperation: Review and refinement. (2018). Thöni, Christian ; Volk, Stefan ; Thoni, Christian.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:171:y:2018:i:c:p:37-40.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Selection in the Lab: A Network Approach. (2018). Alekseev, Aleksandr ; Freer, Mikhail.
    In: Working Papers ECARES.
    RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/278180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Selection in the Lab: A Network Approach. (2018). Alekseev, Aleksandr ; Freer, Mikhail.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:chu:wpaper:18-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Social Norm Perception in Economic Laboratory Experiments: Inexperienced versus Experienced Participants. (2018). Schwieren, Christiane ; Schmidt, Robert J ; Sproten, Alec N.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0656.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Conducting interactive experiments online. (2017). Gächter, Simon ; Gaechter, Simon ; Molleman, Lucas ; Arechar, Antonio A.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:not:notcdx:2017-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Intrinsic motivation, health outcomes and the crowding out effect of temporary extrinsic incentives: A lab-in-the-field experiment. (2017). Lancsar, Emily ; Dorner, Zack.
    In: Monash Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mos:moswps:2017-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Gender Differences in the Development of Other-Regarding Preferences. (2017). Thomsen, Stephan ; John, Katrin .
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11044.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Conducting Interactive Experiments Online. (2017). Gächter, Simon ; Gachter, Simon ; Molleman, Lucas ; Arechar, Antonio A.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10517.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Gender Differences in the Development of Other-Regarding Preferences. (2017). Thomsen, Stephan ; John, Katrin .
    In: Hannover Economic Papers (HEP).
    RePEc:han:dpaper:dp-607.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Lab Measures of Other-Regarding Preferences Can Predict Some Related On-the-Job Behavior: Evidence from a Large Scale Field Experiment. (2016). Nosenzo, Daniele ; Burks, Stephen ; Gotte, Lorenz ; Anderson, Jon E ; Ganzhorn, Derek ; Rustichini, Aldo ; Bombyk, Matthew .
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. On the practical relevance of the attraction effect: A cautionary note and guidelines for context effect experiments. (2015). Sarstedt, Marko ; Lichters, Marcel ; Vogt, Bodo.
    In: Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK.
    RePEc:spr:binfse:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:1-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. On the practical relevance of the attraction effect: A cautionary note and guidelines for context effect experiments. (2015). Sarstedt, Marko ; Lichters, Marcel ; Vogt, Bodo.
    In: AMS Review.
    RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:5:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s13162-015-0066-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Lab Measures of Other-Regarding Preferences Can Predict Some Related on-the-Job Behavior: Evidence from a Large Scale Field Experiment. (2015). Nosenzo, Daniele ; Burks, Stephen ; Goette, Lorenz ; Anderson, Jon ; Ganzhorn, Derek ; Rustichini, Aldo ; Bombyk, Matthew .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:not:notcdx:2015-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-25 22:49:11 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.