1. Efficiency analysis using SBM and PLS-SEM: insights from the Italian judicial system. (2024). Rocca, Antonella ; Quintano, Claudio ; Mazzocchi, Paolo.
   In: Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology.
   RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-024-01907-9.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Achenchabe, Y. ; Akaaboune, M. Determinants of judicial efficiency in Morocco. 2021 Open J Bus Manag. 9 2407-2424
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Agrifoglio, R. ; Metallo, C. ; Lepore, L. Success factors for using case management system in Italian courts. 2016 Inf Syst Manag. 33 42-54
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Ahmed, R.K. ; Muhammed, K.H. ; Pappel, I. ; Draheim, D. Impact of e-court systems implementation: a case study. 2021 Transf Gov People Process Policy. 15 108-128
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Andrade, A. ; Joia, L.A. Organizational structure and ICT strategies in the Brazilian judiciary system. 2012 Govern Inf Q. 29 S32-S42
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Bahrami, S. ; Rastegar, M. ; Dehghanian, P. An FBWM-TOPSIS approach to identify critical feeders for reliability centered maintenance in power distribution systems. 2021 IEEE Syst J. 15 3893-3901
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Beenstock, M. ; Haitovsky, Y. Does the appointment of judges increase the output of the judiciary?. 2004 Int Rev Law Econ. 24 351-369

7. Bełdowski, J. ; Dąbroś, Ł. ; Wojciechowski, W. Judges and court performance: a case study of district commercial courts in Poland. 2020 Eur J Law Econ. 50 171-201

8. Ben-David, A. Comparison of classification accuracy using Cohen's Weighted Kappa. 2008 Expert Syst Appl. 34 825-832
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Bhatnagar, A. ; Gupta, A. ; Joshi, A. ; Bolia, N. An integrated framework for the improvement of school bus services: understanding commuters' perceptions for sustainable school bus transportation. 2022 Habitat Int. 126 -
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Bielen, S. ; Marneffe, W. Are courts to blame for delays in Belgian civil procedures?: a decomposition of case duration. 2017 Justice Syst J. 38 399-420
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Bielen, S. ; Marneffe, W. ; Vereeck, L. An empirical analysis of case disposition time in Belgium. 2015 Rev Law Econ. 11 293-316

12. Blank, J.L.T. ; van Heezik, A.A.S. Policy reforms and productivity change in the judiciary system: a cost function approach applied to time series of the Dutch judiciary system between 1980 and 2016. 2020 Int Trans Oper Res. 27 2002-2020
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Castro, M.F. ; Guccio, C. Searching for the source of technical inefficiency in Italian judicial districts: an empirical investigation. 2014 Eur J Law Econ. 38 369-391

14. Chawinga, W.D. ; Chawinga, C. ; Kapondera, S.K. ; Chipeta, G.T. ; Majawa, F. ; Nyasulu, C. Towards e-judicial services in Malawi: implications for justice delivery. 2020 Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries. 86 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Chemin, M. Do judiciaries matter for development? Evidence from India. 2009 J Comp Econ. 37 230-250

16. Chemin, M. Does court speed shape economic activity? Evidence from a court reform in India. 2012 J Law Econ Organ. 28 460-485

17. Christensen, R.K. ; Szmer, J. Examining the efficiency of the U.S. courts of appeals: pathologies and prescriptions. 2012 Int Rev Law Econ. 32 30-37

18. Cohen, J. Weighted Kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. 1968 Psychol Bull. 70 213-220
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. D'Amico, G. ; Manca, R. A system maintenance approach to analyzing the Italian judicial system reform proposal of 2010. 2012 Soc Econ Plann Sci. 46 205-215
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Dandurand, Y. Criminal justice reform and the system's efficiency. 2014 Crim Law Forum. 25 383-440
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. de Oliveira Gomes, A. ; de Aquino Guimaraes, T. ; Akutsu, L. The relationship between judicial staffand court performance: evidence from Brazilian state courts. 2016 Int J Court Adm. 8 12-19
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. de Weers, T. Case flow management net-project - the practical value for civil justice in The Netherlands. 2016 Int J Court Adm. 8 32-42
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. Deyneli, F. Analysis of relationship between efficiency of justice services and salaries of judges with two-stage DEA method. 2012 Eur J Law Econ. 34 477-493

24. Dimitrova-Grajzl, V. ; Grajzl, P. ; Slavov, A. ; Zajc, K. Courts in a transition economy: case disposition and the quantity-quality tradeoff in Bulgaria. 2016 Econ Syst. 40 18-38

25. Dimitrova-Grajzl, V. ; Grajzl, P. ; Sustersic, J. ; Zajc, K. Court output, judicial staffing, and the demand for court services: evidence from Slovenian courts of first instance. 2012 Int Rev Law Econ. 32 19-29

26. Djankov, S. ; Porta, R. ; La, Lopez-de-Silanes, F. ; Shleifer, A. Courts. 2003 Q J Econ. 118 453-517
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. Dutta, P.K. Missing judges in courts and cops in police stations: Why justice is delayed. 2020 India Today:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. E-Committee Supreme Court of India, Digital courts vision and roadmap e-courts project phase III. 2022 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Easton, J. Where to draw the line? Is efficiency encroaching on a fair justice system?. 2018 Polit Q. 89 246-253
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. El Bialy, N. The 2007 judicial reform and court performance in Egypt. 2016 Rev Law Econ. 12 95-117

31. Espasa, M. ; Esteller-Moré, A. Analyzing judicial courts' performance: inefficiency vs. congestion. 2015 Rev Econ Apl. 23 61-82
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Falavigna, G. ; Ippoliti, R. Reform policy to increase the judicial efficiency in Italy: the opportunity offered by EU post-Covid funds. 2021 J Pol Model. 43 923-943

33. Falavigna, Greta ; Ippoliti, R. ; Manello, A. ; Ramello, G.B. Judicial productivity, delay and efficiency: a Directional Distance Function (DDF) approach. 2015 Eur J Oper Res. 240 592-601
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

34. Falavigna, Greta ; Ippoliti, R. ; Ramello, G.B. DEA-based Malmquist productivity indexes for understanding courts reform. 2018 Soc Econ Plann Sci. 62 31-43

35. Fauvrelle, T.A. ; Almeida, A.T.C. Determinants of judicial efficiency change: evidence from Brazil. 2018 Rev Law Econ. 14 -

36. Ferro, G. ; Oubiña, V. ; Romero, C. Benchmarking labor courts: an efficiency frontier analysis. 2020 Int J Court Adm. 11 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Filho, R.F. The use of ICT in Brazilian courts. 2009 Electron J eGovernment. 7 349-358
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
38. Fink, A. Survey research methods. 2010 En : Peterson, P. ; Baker, E. ; McGaw, B. International encyclopedia of education. Elsevier:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

39. Giacalone, M. ; Nissi, E. ; Cusatelli, C. Dynamic efficiency evaluation of Italian judicial system using DEA based Malmquist productivity indexes. 2020 Soc Econ Plann Sci. 72 -

40. Gomes, A.O. ; Alves, S.T. ; Silva, J.T. Effects of investment in information and communication technologies on productivity of courts in Brazil. 2018 Govern Inf Q. 35 480-490
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

41. Grajzl, P. ; Silwal, S. Multi-court judging and judicial productivity in a career judiciary: evidence from Nepal. 2020 Int Rev Law Econ. 61 -

42. Grajzl, P. ; Silwal, S. The functioning of courts in a developing economy: evidence from Nepal. 2020 Eur J Law Econ. 49 101-129

43. Guerra, A. ; Tagliapietra, C. Does judge turnover affect judicial performance? Evidence from Italian court records. 2017 Justice Syst J. 38 52-77
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Guo, S. ; Zhao, H. Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. 2017 Knowl Base Syst. 121 23-31
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

45. Gupta, M. ; Bolia, N.B. Efficiency measurement of Indian high courts using DEA: a policy perspective. 2020 J Pol Model. 42 1372-1393

46. Gupta, M. ; Bolia, N.B. Redistribution of judicial resources for improved performance. 2023 Ann Oper Res. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Hayo, B. ; Voigt, S. The relevance of judicial procedure for economic growth. 2014 CESifo Econ Stud. 60 490-524

48. He, F. ; Qu, R. A constraint programming based column generation approach to nurse rostering problems. 2012 Comput Oper Res. 39 3331-3343
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. Hemrajani, R. ; Agarwal, H. A temporal analysis of the Supreme Court of India's workload. 2019 Indiana Law Rev. 3 125-158
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

50. Ippoliti, R. ; Tria, G. Efficiency of judicial systems: model definition and output estimation. 2020 J Appl Econ. 23 385-408

51. Kahraman, C. ; Ertay, T. ; Büyüközkan, G. A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. 2006 Eur J Oper Res. 171 390-411

52. Kinhal, D. ; Gupta, S. ; Chandrashekaran, S. Government litigation: an introduction. 2018 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Kinhal, D. ; Kumar, A.P. A study of Karnataka high court's write jurisdiction. 2018 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
54. Köhling, W.K.C. The economic consequences of a weak judiciary: insights from India. 2000 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

55. Kolagar, M. ; Hosseini, S.M.H. ; Felegari, R. ; Fattahi, P. Policy-making for renewable energy sources in search of sustainable development: a hybrid DEA-FBWM approach. 2020 Environ Syst Decis. 40 485-509

56. Konina, A. Technology-driven changes in an organizational structure: the case of Canada's courts administration service. 2020 Int J Court Adm. 11 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
57. Law Commission of India Arrears and backlog: creating additional judicial (wo)manpower (issue 245. 2014 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
58. Louro, A.C. ; Santos, W.R. ; Filho, H.Z. Productivity antecedents of Brazilian courts of justice: evidence from Justiça em números. 2017 BAR - Braz Administr Rev. 14 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
59. McKechnie, D. The use of the internet by courts and the judiciary: findings from a study trip and supplementary research. 2003 Int J Law Info Technol. 11 109-148
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

60. Melcarne, A. ; Ramello, G.B. Judicial independence, judges' incentives and efficiency. 2015 Rev Law Econ. 11 149-169

61. Ministry of Finance, Economic survey 2018-19. 2019 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

62. Mitsopoulos, M. ; Pelagidis, T. Does staffing affect the time to dispose cases in Greek courts?. 2007 Int Rev Law Econ. 27 219-244

63. Mitsopoulos, M. ; Pelagidis, T. Greek appeals courts' quality analysis and performance. 2010 Eur J Law Econ. 30 17-39

64. Mosweu, T.L. ; Kenosi, L. Implementation of the court records management system in the delivery of justice at the gaborone magisterial district, Botswana. 2018 Record Manag J. 28 234-251
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
65. Neto, M.S. ; de Souza, L.A.C. ; Louzada, L.C. Application of data envelopment analysis and logistic regression: analysis of the efficiency of the State courts of Brazil. 2017 SPACES Magazine. 38 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

66. Nissi, E. ; Giacalone, M. ; Cusatelli, C. The efficiency of the Italian judicial system: a two stage data envelopment analysis approach. 2019 Soc Indicat Res. 146 395-407

67. Niv, M.B. ; Lieber, Z. ; Ronen, B. Focused management in a court system: doing more with the existing resources. 2010 Hum Syst Manag. 29 265-277
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
68. Oktal, O. ; Alpu, O. ; Yazici, B. Measurement of internal user satisfaction and acceptance of the e-justice system in Turkey. 2016 Aslib J Inf Manag. 68 716-735
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
69. Ostrom, B.J. ; Hanson, R.A. ; Kleiman, M. Improving the pace of criminal case processing in state trial courts. 2018 Crim Justice Pol Rev. 29 736-760
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
70. Patil, A. ; Shardeo, V. ; Dwivedi, A. ; Madaan, J. An integrated approach to model the blockchain implementation barriers in humanitarian supply chain. 2021 J Glob Oper Strateg Sourc. 14 81-103
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
71. Patil, A. ; Shardeo, V. ; Dwivedi, A. ; Madaan, J. ; Varma, N. Barriers to sustainability in humanitarian medical supply chains. 2021 Sustain Prod Consum. 27 1794-1807
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
72. Peyrache, A. ; Zago, A. Large courts, small justice! The inefficiency and the optimal structure of the Italian justice sector. 2016 Omega. 64 42-56
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
73. Piątek, W. ; Potěši, L. A right to have one's case heard within a reasonable time before the Czech and the polish supreme administrative courts – standards, the reality and proposals for the future. 2021 Utrecht Law Rev. 17 20-32
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
74. Press Information Bureau, Digitization of courts. 2023 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
75. Procopiuck, M. Information technology and time of judgment in specialized courts: what is the impact of changing from physical to electronic processing?. 2018 Govern Inf Q. 35 491-501
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

76. Rathinam, F.X. ; Raja, A.V. Law and availability of credit: evidence from India. 2010 Asian J Law Econ. 1 -

77. Rezaei, J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. 2015 Omega. 53 49-57

78. Rosa, J. ; Teixeira, C. ; Sousa Pinto, J. Risk factors in e-justice information systems. 2013 Govern Inf Q. 30 241-256
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
79. Rosales-López, V. Economics of court performance: an empirical analysis. 2008 Eur J Law Econ. 25 231-251
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
80. Saman, W.S.W.M. ; Haider, A. E-Court: technology diffusion in court management. 2013 Americas Conference on Information Systems:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
81. Saman, W.S.W.M. ; Haider, A. Electronic court records management: a case study. 2012 J E-Government Stud Best Pract. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
82. Sen, S. Indian judiciary imprisoned: an integrated AHP–TOPSIS approach to judicial productivity. 2020 Global Bus Rev. 21 586-603
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
83. Shi, C. ; Sourdin, T. ; Li, B. The smart court – a new pathway to justice in China?. 2021 Int J Court Adm. 12 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
84. Skivenes, M. ; Tonheim, M. Improving decision-making in care order proceedings: a multijurisdictional study of court decision-makers’ viewpoints. 2019 Child Fam Soc Work. 24 173-182
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
85. Sousa, M.D.M. ; Guimaraes, T.A. Resources, innovation and performance in labor courts in Brazil. 2018 Rev Adm Públ. 52 486-506
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
86. Staszkiewicz, P. ; Morawska, S. ; Banasik, P. ; Witkowski, B. ; Staszkiewicz, R. Do judges' delegations affect judicial performance? A transition economy evidence. 2020 Justice Syst J. 41 344-359
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
87. Sung, H.-C. Can online courts promote access to justice? A case study of the internet courts in China. 2020 Comput Law Secur Rep. 39 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
88. Szmer, J. ; Christensen, R.K. ; Kuersten, A. The efficiency of federal appellate decisions: an examination of published and unpublished opinions. 2012 Justice Syst J. 33 318-338
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
89. Tahura, U.S. Can technology Be a potential solution for a cost-effective litigation system in Bangladesh?. 2021 Justice Syst J. 42 180-204
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
90. Viapiana, F. A performance-based budget in the judiciary: allocation of resources and performance variability in first instance courts. An analysis of three case studies. 2021 J Public Budg Account Financ Manag. 33 177-206
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
91. Viapiana, F. Funding the judiciary: how budgeting system shapes justice. A comparative analysis of three case studies. 2019 Int J Court Adm. 10 23-33
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
92. Viera, A.J. ; Garrett, J.M. Understanding interobserver agreement: the Kappa statistic. 2005 Fam Med. 37 360-363
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
93. Voet, S. Belgium's new specialized judiciary. 2014 Russ Law J. 2 129-145
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
94. Voigt, S. ; El-Bialy, N. Identifying the determinants of aggregate judicial performance: taxpayers' money well spent?. 2016 Eur J Law Econ. 41 283-319
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
95. Whalen-Bridge, H. Court backlogs: balancing efficiency and justice in Singapore. 2019 Int J Leg Prof. 26 159-177
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
96. Yeung, L.L. ; Azevedo, P.F. Measuring efficiency of Brazilian courts with data envelopment analysis (DEA). 2011 IMA J Manag Math. 22 343-356
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

97. Yeung, T.Y.C. ; Ovádek, M. ; Lampach, N. Time efficiency as a measure of court performance: evidence from the Court of Justice of the European Union. 2022 Eur J Law Econ. 53 209-234

1. Time efficiency as a measure of court performance: evidence from the Court of Justice of the European Union. (2022). Yeung, Timothy Yu-Cheong ; Lampach, Nicolas ; Ovadek, Michal.
   In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
   RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:53:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10657-021-09722-5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Determinants of judges’ career choices and productivity: a Polish case study. (2022). Metelska-Szaniawska, Katarzyna ; Morawska, Sylwia ; Banasik, Przemysaw ; Godlewska, Magorzata.
   In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
   RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:53:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10657-021-09688-4.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Workplace disruptions, judge caseloads, and judge decisions: Evidence from SSA judicial corps retirements. (2022). Wilson, Riley ; Shumway, Clayson.
   In: Journal of Public Economics.
   RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:205:y:2022:i:c:s0047272721002097.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Judicial Efficiency and Economic Growth: Evidence based on EU data. (2021). Rizos, Anastasios ; Kapopoulos, Panayotis.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:107861.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Judicial enforcement and caseload: theory and evidence from Brazil. (2021). Grajzl, Peter ; Guimaraes, Tomas Aquino ; Castelliano, Caio ; Alves, Andre.
   In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
   RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:52:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10657-021-09705-6.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Is it Darker in a Larger Courtroom? On the Relationship Between the Size of Regional Court and Exercising the Right to Public Information in Poland. (2021). Możdżeń, Michał ; Mozdzen, Michal ; Biga, Bartlomiej.
   In: European Research Studies Journal.
   RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:1:p:1189-1203.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. How has the Covid19 pandemic impacted the courts of law? Evidence from Brazil. (2021). Grajzl, Peter ; Watanabe, Eduardo ; Castelliano, Caio.
   In: International Review of Law and Economics.
   RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:66:y:2021:i:c:s0144818821000132.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Indian Judiciary Imprisoned: An Integrated AHP€“TOPSIS Approach to Judicial Productivity. (2020). Sen, Samudra.
   In: Global Business Review.
   RePEc:sae:globus:v:21:y:2020:i:2:p:586-603.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Manna from Heaven for Judges– Judges’ Reaction to a Quasi-Random Reduction in Caseload. (2020). Engel, Christoph ; Weinshall, Keren.
   In: Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
   RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2020_01.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Judges and court performance: a case study of district commercial courts in Poland. (2020). Wojciechowski, Wiktor ; Dbro, Ukasz ; Bedowski, Jarosaw.
    In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:50:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10657-020-09656-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. The functioning of courts in a developing economy: evidence from Nepal. (2020). Silwal, Shikha ; Grajzl, Peter.
    In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:49:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10657-017-9570-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Efficiency measurement of Indian high courts using DEA: A policy perspective. (2020). Bolia, Nomesh B ; Gupta, Maansi.
    In: Journal of Policy Modeling.
    RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:42:y:2020:i:6:p:1372-1393.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Multi-court judging and judicial productivity in a career judiciary: Evidence from Nepal. (2020). Silwal, Shikha ; Grajzl, Peter.
    In: International Review of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:61:y:2020:i:c:s0144818819302042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. The Efficiency of the Italian Judicial System: A Two Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. (2019). giacalone, massimiliano ; Nissi, Eugenia ; Cusatelli, Carlo.
    In: Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement.
    RePEc:spr:soinre:v:146:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-018-1892-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Access to Justice and Economic Development: Evidence from an International Panel Dataset. (2019). Levai, Adam ; Deseau, Arnaud ; Schmiegelow, Michele.
    In: LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES.
    RePEc:ctl:louvir:2019009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Benchmarking Labor Courts: an Efficiency Frontier Analysis. (2019). Romero, Carlos ; Ferro, Gustavo ; Oubinia, Victoria.
    In: Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers.
    RePEc:aep:anales:4140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Governance of tax courts. (2018). Ramello, Giovanni ; Ippoliti, Roberto.
    In: Economics of Governance.
    RePEc:spr:ecogov:v:19:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10101-018-0212-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. A bootstrapped Malmquist index applied to Swedish district courts. (2018). Andersson, Christian ; Mattsson, Pontus ; Mnsson, Jonas ; Bonander, Fredrik.
    In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:46:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10657-018-9582-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Overburdened judges. (2018). Soubeyran, Raphael ; Roussey, Ludivine.
    In: CEE-M Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpceem:halshs-01936006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Overburdened judges. (2018). Soubeyran, Raphael ; Roussey, Ludivine.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01936006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Overburdened judges. (2018). Soubeyran, Raphael ; Roussey, Ludivine.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02791013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Overburdened judges. (2018). Soubeyran, Raphael ; Roussey, Ludivine.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02621924.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. DEA-based Malmquist productivity indexes for understanding courts reform. (2018). Ramello, Giovanni ; Ippoliti, Roberto ; Falavigna, Greta.
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:62:y:2018:i:c:p:31-43.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Overburdened judges. (2018). Soubeyran, Raphael ; Roussey, Ludivine.
    In: International Review of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:55:y:2018:i:c:p:21-32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Procedural Delay in the Developing Middle East. (2018). Kim, Economides.
    In: The Law and Development Review.
    RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:97-125:n:6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Productivity in civil justice in Portugal: A crucial issue in a congested system. (2017). Pereira, Manuel ; Wemans, Lara.
    In: Economic Bulletin and Financial Stability Report Articles and Banco de Portugal Economic Studies.
    RePEc:ptu:bdpart:e201701.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. The Role of Precedents on Court Delay - Evidence from a civil law country. (2017). Berlemann, Michael ; Christmann, Robin.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:80057.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Appeal rate and caseload: evidence from civil litigation in Korea. (2017). Min, Heechul ; Kim, Duol.
    In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:44:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10657-016-9544-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Determinants of judicial efficiency: a survey. (2016). Voigt, Stefan.
    In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:42:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10657-016-9531-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Courts in a transition economy: Case disposition and the quantity–quality tradeoff in Bulgaria. (2016). Grajzl, Peter ; Dimitrova-Grajzl, Valentina ; Zajc, Katarina ; Slavov, Atanas .
    In: Economic Systems.
    RePEc:eee:ecosys:v:40:y:2016:i:1:p:18-38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. The Duration of Judicial Deliberation: Evidence from Belgium. (2016). Grajzl, Peter ; Dimitrova-Grajzl, Valentina ; Bielen, Samantha ; Marneffe, Wim.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_5947.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Judicial Independence, Judges’ Incentives and Efficiency. (2015). Ramello, Giovanni ; Melcarne, Alessandro.
    In: IEL Working Papers.
    RePEc:uca:ucaiel:19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. La riforma della geografia giudiziaria: efficienza tecnica e domanda di giustizia. (2015). Ippoliti, Roberto.
    In: ECONOMIA PUBBLICA.
    RePEc:fan:epepep:v:html10.3280/ep2015-002003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Appellate caseload and the switch to comparative negligence. (2015). Faure, Michael ; Klick, Jonathan ; de Mot, Jef.
    In: International Review of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:42:y:2015:i:c:p:147-156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Judicial productivity, delay and efficiency: A Directional Distance Function (DDF) approach. (2015). Ramello, Giovanni ; Manello, Alessandro ; Ippoliti, Roberto ; Falavigna, Greta.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:240:y:2015:i:2:p:592-601.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Courts in a Transition Economy: Case Disposition and the Quantity-Quality Tradeoff in Bulgaria. (2015). Grajzl, Peter ; Dimitrova-Grajzl, Valentina ; Zajc, Katarina ; Slavov, Atanas .
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_5283.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. The Effects of a Simpler Criminal Procedure on Criminal Case Outcomes: Evidence from Czech District-level Data. (2015). Dusek, Libor.
    In: CERGE-EI Working Papers.
    RePEc:cer:papers:wp528.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Efficienza Tecnica e Geografia Giudiziaria. (2014). Ippoliti, Roberto.
    In: POLIS Working Papers.
    RePEc:uca:ucapdv:178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. An analysis of how 2002 judicial reorganisation has impacted on the performance of the First Instance Courts (Preture) in Ticino. (2014). Vatiero, Massimiliano ; Ippoliti, Roberto.
    In: IdEP Economic Papers.
    RePEc:lug:wpidep:1408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Understanding modes of civil case disposition: Evidence from Slovenian courts. (2014). Grajzl, Peter ; Dimitrova-Grajzl, Valentina ; Zajc, Katarina.
    In: Journal of Comparative Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jcecon:v:42:y:2014:i:4:p:924-939.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Are Courts Slow? Exposing and Measuring the Invisible Determinants of Case Disposition Time. (2013). Haug, Alfred ; Economides, Kim ; McIntyre, Joe .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:otg:wpaper:1317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Talent matters: Judicial productivity and speed in Japan. (2012). Ramseyer, John.
    In: International Review of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:32:y:2012:i:1:p:38-48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Examining the efficiency of the U.S. courts of appeals: Pathologies and prescriptions. (2012). Christensen, Robert K. ; Szmer, John.
    In: International Review of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:32:y:2012:i:1:p:30-37.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Court output, judicial staffing, and the demand for court services: Evidence from Slovenian courts of first instance. (2012). Šušteršič, Janez ; Grajzl, Peter ; Dimitrova-Grajzl, Valentina ; Zajc, Katarina ; Sustersic, Janez .
    In: International Review of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:32:y:2012:i:1:p:19-29.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Measuring the Efficiency of Brazilian Courts from 2006 to 2008: What Do the Numbers Tell Us?. (2011). YEUNG LUK TAI, LUCIANA ; Azevedo, Paulo.
    In: Insper Working Papers.
    RePEc:ibm:ibmecp:wpe_251.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Beyond ConventionalWisdom and Anecdotal Evidence: Measuring Efficiency of Brazilian Courts. (2011). YEUNG LUK TAI, LUCIANA ; Azevedo, Paulo ; de Azevedo, Paulo Furquim.
    In: Anais do XXXVII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 37th Brazilian Economics Meeting].
    RePEc:anp:en2009:122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. ALÉM DO SENSO COMUM E DAS EVIDÊNCIAS ANEDÓTICAS: UMA ANÁLISE ECONÔMICA DO JUDICIÁRIO BRASILEIRO. (2010). YEUNG LUK TAI, LUCIANA ; Azevedo, Paulo ; de Azevedo, Paulo Furquim.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fea:wpaper:13-2010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Labor Court Inputs, Judicial Cases Outcomes and Labor Flows: Identifying Real EPL.. (2009). Kramarz, Francis ; fraisse, henri ; PROST, C..
    In: Working papers.
    RePEc:bfr:banfra:256.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Law and Order Efficiency Measurement – A Literature Review. (2008). Aubyn, Miguel.
    In: Working Papers Department of Economics.
    RePEc:ise:isegwp:wp192008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. The Effect of Judicial Expedience on Attorney Fees in Class Actions. (2007). Klick, Jonathan ; Helland, Eric.
    In: The Journal of Legal Studies.
    RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:36:y:2007:p:171-187.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-06 02:03:11 || Missing content? Let us know