create a website

Valuing informal carers’ quality of life using best-worst scaling—Finnish preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer). (2022). Saloniki, Eirini-Christina ; Burge, Peter ; Nguyen, Lien ; Batchelder, Laurie ; Malley, Juliette ; Forder, Julien ; Linnosmaa, Ismo ; Lu, Hui ; Jokimaki, Hanna ; Trukeschitz, Birgit.
In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
RePEc:ehl:lserod:111885.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 69

References cited by this document

Cocites: 45

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Badia, X., Roset, M., Herdman, M., Kind, P.: A comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Med. Decis. Making 21, 7–16 (2001). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​02729​89x01​02100​102

  2. Barbieri, D., Ghibelli, P. (eds.): Formal versus informal longterm care: economic and social impacts. SPRINT Working Paper D4.4. SPRINT, Brussels (2019). http://​sprint-​proje​ct.​eu/​wp-​conte​ nt/​uploa​ds/​2018/​09/​SPRINT_​D4.4_​Formal_​vs_​Infor​mal-​LTC_​ Econo​mic_​Social_​Impac​ts.​pdf. Accessed 29 June L. Nguyen et al. 1 3
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Batchelder, L., Malley, J., Burge, P., Lu, H., Saloniki, E.-C., Linnosmaa, I., Trukeschitz, B., Forder, J.E.: Carer social care-related quality of life outcomes: estimating english preference weights for the adult social care outcomes toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer). Value Health 22, 1427–1440 (2019). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​jval.​
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Bauer, J.M., Sousa-Poza, A.: Impacts of informal caregiving on caregiver employment, health, and family. J. Popul. Age. 8, 113–145 (2015). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12062-​015-​9116-0

  5. Bierlaire, M.: BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss transportation research conference. Paper presented at the 3rd swiss transportation research conference, Ascona, Switzerland (2003). http://​bioge​ me.​epfl.​ch. Accessed 9 Sept 2017
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Bulamu, N.B., Kaambwa, B., Ratcliffe, J.: A systematic review of instruments for measuring outcomes in economic evaluation within aged care. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 13, 179 (2015). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12955-​015-​0372-8
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Campbell, D., Boeri, M., Doherty, E., Hutchinson, W.G.: Learning, fatigue and preference formation in discrete choice experiments. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 119, 345–363 (2015). https://​doi.​ org/​10.​1016/j.​jebo.​2015.​08.​018

  8. Campbell, D., Erdem, S.: Position bias in best-worst scaling surveys: a case study on trust in institutions. Am. J. Agri. Econ. 97, 526–545 (2015). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​ajae/​aau112

  9. Carlsson, F., Mørkbak, M.R., Olsen, S.B.: The first time is the hardest: a test of ordering effects in choice experiments. J. Choice Model. 5, 19–37 (2012). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1755-​5345(13)​ 70051-4

  10. Coast, J., Flynn, T.N., Natarajan, L., Sproston, K., Lewis, J., Louviere, J.J., Peters, T.J.: Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Soc. Sci. Med. 67, 874–882 (2008). https://​doi.​org/​

  11. Colombo, F., et al.: Help Wanted? OECD Publishing (2011). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1787/​97892​64097​759-​en. Accessed 10 Jan
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Coons, S.J., Rao, S., Keininger, D.L., Hays, R.D.: A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics 17, 13–35 (2000). https://​doi.​org/​10.​2165/​00019​053-​20001​ 7010-​00002
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Czajkowski, M., Giergiczny, M., Greene, W.H.: Learning and fatigue effects revisited: Investigating the effects of accounting for unobservable preference and scale heterogeneity. Land Econ. 90, 324–351 (2014). https://​doi.​org/​10.​3368/​le.​90.2.​324

  14. Day, B., Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Dupont, D., Louviere, J.J., Morimoto, S., Scarpa, R., Wang, P.: Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies. J. Valuing informal carers’quality of life using best-worst scaling—Finnish preference weights… 1 3 Environ. Econ. Manag. 63, 73–91 (2012). https://​doi.​org/​10.​ 1016/j.​jeem.​2011.​09.​001

  15. DeBell, M., Krosnick, J.A.: Computing weights for American national election study survey data. ANES Technical Report Series, no. nes012427. American National Election Studies, Ann Arbor, MI, Palo Alto, CA (2009). https://​elect​ionst​udies.​org/​wp-​ conte​nt/​uploa​ds/​2018/​04/​nes01​2427.​pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2021
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G.L., Torrance, G.W.: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 4th edn. Oxford University Press (2015)

  17. Educational structure of population 2015: Educational structure of population [e-publication]. Table: population aged 15 or over by level of education, municipality, gender, and age 1970–2015 (2015a). www.​stat.​fi/​til/​vkour/​tau_​en.​html. Accessed 11 May
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Employment statistics 2016: Employment [e-publication]. Table: population by main type of activity, sex, yearly age groups and year 1987–2016 (2016b). www.​stat.​fi/​til/​tyokay/​tau_​en.​html. Accessed 11 May 2018
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Fiebig, D.G., Keane, M.P., Louviere, J., Wasi, N.: The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Market. Sci. 29, 393–421 (2010). https://​doi.​org/​

  20. Finn, A., Louviere, J.J.: Determining the appropriate response to evidence of public concern: the case of food safety. J. Pub. Policy Mark. 11, 12–25 (1992). https://​doi.​org/​10.​2165/​00019​053-​20001​
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Flynn, T.N., Huynh, E., Peters, T.J., Al-Janabi, H., Clemens, S., Moody, A., Coast, J.: Scoring the ICECAP-A capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff. Health Econ. 24, 258–269 (2015). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​hec.​3014

  22. Flynn, T.N., Louviere, J.J., Peters, T.J., Coast, J.: Using discrete choice experiments to understand preferences for quality of life Variance-scale Heterogeneity matters. Soc. Sci. Med. 70, 1957– 1965 (2010). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​socsc​imed.​2010.​03.​008

  23. Flynn, T.N., Marley, A.A.J.: Best-worst scaling: theory and methods. In: Hess, S., Daly, A. (eds.) Handbook of choice modelling, pp. 1–342. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited (2014)
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Flynn, T.N.: Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best–worst scaling. Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. 10, 259–267 (2010). https://​ doi.​org/​10.​1586/​erp.​10.​29
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. George, L.K., Gwyther, L.P.: Caregiver well-being: a multidimensional examination of family caregivers of demented adults. Gerontologist 26, 253–259 (1986). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​geront /​26.3.​253
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Goodrich, K., Kaambwa, B., Al-Janabi, H.: The inclusion of informal care in applied economic evaluation: a review. Value Health 15, 975–981 (2012). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​jval.​2012.​
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Greve, B. (Ed.): Long-term care for the elderly in Europe: development and prospects (1st ed.). Routledge. (2016). https://​doi.​org/​
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., Beaton, D.: Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 46, 1417–1432 (1993). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​0895-​4356(93)​90142-n
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Hajji, A., Trukeschitz, B., Malley, J., Batchelder, L., Saloniki, E., Linnosmaa, I., Lu, H.: Population-based preference weights for the adult social outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) for service users for Austria: findings from a best-worst experiment. Soc. Sci. Med. 250, 112792 (2020). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​socsc​imed.​2020.​

  30. Harvey, K., Catty, J., Langman, A., Winfield, H., Clement, S., Burns, E., White, S., Burns, T.: A review of instruments developed to measure outcomes for carers of people with mental health problems. Acta Psychiatr Scand 117, 164–176 (2008). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/j.​1600-​0447.​2007.​01148.x
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Helter, T.M., Coast, J., Łaszewska, A., Stamm, T., Simon, J.: Capability instruments in economic evaluations of healthrelated interventions: a comparative review of the literature. Qual. Life Res. 29, 1433–1464 (2020). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​ s11136-​019-​02393-5
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M., Greene, W.H.: Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge University Press (2005)
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Hess, S., Hensher, D., Daly, A.J.: Not bored yet - revisiting respondent fatigue in stated choice experiments. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 46, 626–644 (2012). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​tra.​

  34. Hess, S., Train, K.: Correlation and scale in mixed logit models. J. Choice Model. 23, 1–8 (2017). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​jocm.​

  35. Hudson, P.L., Trauer, T., Graham, S., Grande, G., Ewing, G., Payne, S., Stajduhar, K.I., Thomas, K.: A systematic review of instruments related to family caregivers of palliative care patients. Palliat. Med. 24, 656–668 (2010). https://​doi.​org/​10.​ 1177/​02692​16310​373167
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Hunt, S.M., Alonso, J., Bucquet, D., Niero, M., Wiklund, I., McKenna, S.: Cross-cultural adaptation of health measures. Health Policy 19, 33–44 (1991). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​0168-​8510(91)​ 90072-6

  37. Huynh, E., Coast, J., Rose, J., Kinghorn, P., Flynn, T.: Values for the ICECAP-supportive care measure (ICECAP-SCM) for use in economic evaluation at end of life. Soc. Sci. Med. 189, 114–128 (2017). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​socsc​imed.​2017.​07.​012

  38. Johnson, F.R., Lancsar, E., Marshall, D., Kilambi, V., Mühlbacher, A., Regier, D.A., Bresnahan, B.W., Kanninen, B., Bridges, J.F.: Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health 16, 3–13 (2013). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​jval.​2012.​08.​2223
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Johnson, J.A., Luo, N., Shaw, J.W., Kind, P., Coons, S.J.: Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different? Med. Care 43, 221–228 (2005). https://​doi.​ org/​10.​1097/​00005​650-​20050​3000-​00004
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Kaplan, R.M., Feeny, D., Revicki, D.A.: Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures. Qual. Life Res. 2, 467–475 (1993). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​bf004​22221
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Kjær, T., Bech, M., Gyrd-Hansen, D., Hart-Hansen, K.: Ordering effect and price sensitivity in discrete choice experiments: need we worry? Health Econ. 15, 1217–1228 (2006). https://​doi.​org/​

  42. Kumagai, N.: Distinct impacts of high intensity caregiving on caregivers’ mental health and continuation of caregiving. Health Econ. Rev. 7, 15–15 (2017). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​ s13561-​017-​0151-9

  43. Linnosmaa, I., Nguyen, L., Jokimäki, H.: The EXCELC project in Finland: the main descriptive findings from surveys using the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT). Discussion paper 29/2020 Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) (2020). https://​www.​julka​ri.​fi/​handle/​10024/​140416. Accessed 10 Jan
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Louviere, J., Flynn, T., Marley, A.A.J.: Best-worst scaling: theory, methods and applications. Cambridge University Press (2015)
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Louviere, J., Street, D., Carson, R., Ainslie, A., Deshazo, J.R., Cameron, T., Hensher, D., Kohn, R., Marley, T.: Dissecting the random component of utility. Mark. Lett. 13, 177–193 (2002). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1023/a:​10202​58402​210
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Mühlbacher, A.C., Kaczynski, A., Zweifel, P., Johnson, F.R.: Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview. Health Econ. Rev. 6, 2–2 (2016). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13561-​015-​0079-x

  47. Makai, P., Brouwer, W.B., Koopmanschap, M.A., Stolk, E.A., Nieboer, A.P.: Quality of life instruments for economic evaluations in health and social care for older people: a systematic review. Soc. Sci. Med. 102, 83–93 (2014). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​socsc​imed.​

  48. Malley, J., Fox, D., Netten, A.: Developing a carers' experience performance indicator. PSSRU Discussion Paper 2734. University of Kent, Kent (2010). https://​kar.​kent.​ac.​uk/​77660/2/​dp2734.​pdf. Accessed 22 June 2019
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. McFadden, D.: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka, P. (ed.) Frontiers in econometrics, pp. 105–142. Academic Press (1974)
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Murto, J., Kaikkonen, R., Pentala-Nikulainen, O., Koskela, T., Virtala, E., Härkänen, T., Koskenniemi, T., Jussmäki, T., Vartiainen, E., Koskinen, S.: Aikuisten terveys-, hyvinvointi- ja palvelututkimus ATH:n perustulokset 2010–2016. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare THL, Helsinki (2018). Verkkojulkaisu: thl.fi/ ath. Accessed 21 Jan 2020
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Netten, A., Burge, P., Malley, J., Potoglou, D., Towers, A.-M., Brazier, J., Flynn, T., Forder, J., Wall, B.: Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure. Health Technol. Assess. 16, 1–166 (2012). https://​doi.​org/​10.​3310/​hta16​
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Nguyen, L., Jokimäki, H., Linnosmaa, I., Saloniki, E.-C., Batchelder, L., Malley, J., Lu, H., Burge, P., Trukeschitz, B., Forder, J.: Do you prefer safety to social participation? Finnish populationbased preference weights for the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) for service users. MDM Policy Practice (2021). https://​ doi.​org/​10.​1177/​23814​68321​10279​02

  53. OECD: Informal carers: In: ealth at a Glance 2017: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing (2017)
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Population Statistics 2016: Population structure [e-publication].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Potoglou, D., Burge, P., Flynn, T., Netten, A., Malley, J., Forder, J., Brazier, J.E.: Best–worst scaling vs discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data. Soc. Sci. Med. 72, 1717–1727 (2011). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​socsc​imed.​

  56. Radloff, L.S.: The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1, 385–401 (1977). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​01466​21677​00100​306
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. RAND Europe (2010). https://​www.​rand.​org/​pubs/​worki​ ng_​papers/​WR744.​html. Accessed 1 Mar 2018
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Rand, S.E., Malley, J.N., Netten, A.P., Forder, J.E.: Factor structure and construct validity of the adult social care outcomes toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer). Qual. Life Res. 24, 2601–2614 (2015). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-​015-​1011-x
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Saloniki, E.-C., Malley, J., Burge, P., Lu, H., Batchelder, L., Linnosmaa, I., Trukeschitz, B., Forder, J.: Comparing internet and face-to-face surveys as methods for eliciting preferences for social care-related quality of life: evidence from England using the ASCOT service user measure. Qual. Life Res. (2019). https://​ doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-​019-​02172-2
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Salthouse, T.A., Kausler, D.H., Saults, J.S.: Age, self-assessed health status, and cognition. J. Gerontol. 45, P156–P160 (1990). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​geronj/​45.4.​p156
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Savage, S., Bailey, S.: The impact of caring on caregivers’ mental health: a review of the literature. Aust. Health Rev. 27, 111–117 (2004). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1071/​ah042​710111
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Savage, S.J., Waldman, D.M.: Learning and fatigue during choice experiments: a comparison of online and mail survey modes. J. Appl. Econ. 23, 351–371 (2008). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jae.​984

  63. Shiroiwa, T., Moriyama, Y., Nakamura-Thomas, H., Morikawa, M., Fukuda, T., Batchelder, L., Saloniki, E.-C., Malley, J.: Development of Japanese utility weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) SCT4. Qual. Life Res. 29, 253–263 (2020). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-​019-​02287-6
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Statistics from Statistics Finland, Official Statistics of Finland (OSF), Helsinki: Dwellings and housing conditions 2015: L. Nguyen et al. 1 3 dwellings and housing conditions [e-publication] (2015b). www.​ stat.​fi/​til/​asas/​tau_​en.​html. Accessed 23 Jan 2017
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Thurstone, L.L.: A law of comparative judgement. Psychol. Rev. 101, 266–270 (1994). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​0033-​295X.​101.2.​
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Train, K.E.: Discrete choice methods with simulation. Second edition. Cambridge University Press (2009). https://​eml.​berke​ley.​ edu/​books/​choic​e2.​html. Accessed 31 July 2018

  67. Trukeschitz, B., Hajji, A., Batchelder, L., Saloniki, E., Linnosmaa, I., Malley, J.: What’s important when caring for a loved one? Population-based preference weights for the adult social care outcomes toolkit for informal carers (ASCOT-Carer) for Austria. Qual. Life Res. (2021). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​ s11136-​021-​02775-8
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. van den Berg, B., Fiebig, D.G., Hall, J.: Well-being losses due to care-giving. J. Health Econ. 35, 123–131 (2014). https://​doi.​ org/​10.​1016/j.​jheal​eco.​2014.​01.​008

  69. Zarit, S.H., Reever, K.E., Bach-Peterson, J.: Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist 20, 649–655 (1980). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​geront/​20.6.​649
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Valuation of the EQ-5D-3L in Jordan. (2025). Rabayah, Abeer ; Roudijk, Bram ; Purba, Fredrick Dermawan ; Rencz, Fanni ; Jaddoua, Saad ; Siebert, Uwe.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10198-024-01712-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Comparison of Caregiver and General Population Preferences for Dependency-Related Health States. (2025). Sampayo, Antonio ; Rodrguez-Mguez, Eva.
    In: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy.
    RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:23:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40258-024-00908-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The Use of a Discrete Choice Experiment Including Both Duration and Dead for the Development of an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Australia. (2023). Lorgelly, Paula ; Lancsar, Emily ; Ratcliffe, Julie ; Street, Deborah ; Mulhern, Brendan ; Viney, Rosalie ; Norman, Richard.
    In: PharmacoEconomics.
    RePEc:spr:pharme:v:41:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01243-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L Over Time? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Responsiveness of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Nine Countries. (2022). Janssen, Mathieu F ; Buchholz, Ines ; Bonsel, Gouke J ; Golicki, Dominik.
    In: PharmacoEconomics.
    RePEc:spr:pharme:v:40:y:2022:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-022-01172-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Valuing informal carers’ quality of life using best-worst scaling—Finnish preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer). (2022). Saloniki, Eirini-Christina ; Linnosmaa, Ismo ; Lu, Hui ; Jokimaki, Hanna ; Trukeschitz, Birgit ; Burge, Peter ; Nguyen, Lien ; Batchelder, Laurie ; Malley, Juliette ; Forder, Julien.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:23:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10198-021-01356-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Valuing informal carers’ quality of life using best-worst scaling—Finnish preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer). (2022). Saloniki, Eirini-Christina ; Burge, Peter ; Nguyen, Lien ; Batchelder, Laurie ; Malley, Juliette ; Forder, Julien ; Linnosmaa, Ismo ; Lu, Hui ; Jokimaki, Hanna ; Trukeschitz, Birgit.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:111885.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. General population normative data for the EQ-5D-3L in the five largest European economies. (2021). Pickard, Simon A ; Janssen, Mathieu F ; Shaw, James W.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:22:y:2021:i:9:d:10.1007_s10198-021-01326-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Bayesian modeling of health state preferences: could borrowing strength from existing countries’ valuations produce better estimates. (2021). Beyh, Yara ; Kharroubi, Samer A.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:22:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s10198-021-01289-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Health-Related Quality of Life Norm Data of the Peruvian Adolescents: Results Using the EQ-5D-Y. (2021). Barrios-Fernandez, Sabina ; Palacios-Cartagena, Roxana Paola ; Hernandez-Mocholi, Miguel Angel ; Garcia-Gordillo, Miguel Angel ; Mendoza-Muoz, Maria ; Adsuar, Jose Carmelo ; Carlos-Vivas, Jorge.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8735-:d:617182.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Estimating an EQ-5D-3L Value Set for Romania Using Time Trade-Off. (2021). Oluboyede, Yemi ; Ernu, Simona ; Caplescu, Raluca ; Paveliu, Marian Sorin ; Vale, Luke ; Niculescu-Aron, Ileana-Gabriela ; Olariu, Elena.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7415-:d:592395.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Examining the Feasibility and Acceptability of Valuing the Arabic Version of SF-6D in a Lebanese Population. (2020). Beyh, Yara ; Kharroubi, Samer A ; el Harake, Marwa Diab ; Brazier, John ; Rowen, Donna ; Dawoud, Dalia.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:1037-:d:317371.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Examining the transnational health preferences of a group of Eastern European migrants relative to a European host population using the EQ-5D-5L. (2020). O'Neill, Stephen ; Barry, Luke ; Doherty, Edel ; Kelleher, Dan ; Hobbins, Anna.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:246:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620300204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Is the Validity of Cost Utility Analysis Improved When Utility is Measured by an Instrument with ‘Home-Country’ Weights? Evidence from Six Western Countries. (2019). Khan, Munir A ; Richardson, Jeff.
    In: Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement.
    RePEc:spr:soinre:v:145:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-019-02094-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Mapping the kidney disease quality of life 36-item short form survey (KDQOL-36) to the EQ-5D-3L and the EQ-5D-5L in patients undergoing dialysis. (2019). Luo, Nan ; Piercy, James ; Jackson, James ; Yang, Fan ; Moon, Rebecca.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:20:y:2019:i:8:d:10.1007_s10198-019-01088-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Valuation of preference-based measures: can existing preference data be used to select a smaller sample of health states?. (2019). Kharroubi, Samer A ; Rowen, Donna.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:20:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10198-018-0991-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. A comparison of European, Polish, Slovenian and British EQ-5D-3L value sets using a Hungarian sample of 18 chronic diseases. (2019). Hermann, Zoltan ; Brodszky, Valentin ; Baji, Petra ; Pentek, Marta ; Gulacsi, Laszlo ; Rencz, Fanni ; Golicki, Dominik ; Beretzky, Zsuzsanna ; Zrubka, Zsombor ; Prevolnik-Rupel, Valentina.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:20:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-019-01069-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Reducing preference reversals: The role of preference imprecision and nontransparent methods. (2018). Sanchez Martinez, Fernando Ignacio ; pinto-prades, jose-luis ; ABELLAN-PERPIÑAN, JOSE-MARIA ; Abellanperpian, Jose Maria ; Pintoprades, Jose Luis ; Martinezperez, Jorge E ; Sanchezmartinez, Fernando Ignacio.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:27:y:2018:i:8:p:1230-1246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Response Patterns in Health State Valuation Using Endogenous Attribute Attendance and Latent Class Analysis. (2016). Viney, Rosalie ; Hole, Arne ; Norman, Richard.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:25:y:2016:i:2:p:212-224.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The DEP-6D, a new preference-based measure to assess health states of dependency. (2016). Sampayo, Antonio ; ABELLAN-PERPIÑAN, JOSE-MARIA ; Gonzalez, X M ; Alvarez, X C ; Abellan-Perpian, J M ; Rodriguez-Miguez, E.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:153:y:2016:i:c:p:210-219.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Do Chinese have similar health-state preferences? A comparison of mainland Chinese and Singaporean Chinese. (2015). Wang, P ; Luo, N ; Li, M ; Thumboo, J ; Liu, G.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:16:y:2015:i:8:p:857-863.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Between-country heterogeneity in EQ-5D-3L scoring algorithms: how much is due to differences in health state selection?. (2015). Perampaladas, Kuhan ; Gaebel, Kathryn ; Xie, Feng ; Pullenayegum, Eleanor ; Doble, Brett.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:16:y:2015:i:8:p:847-855.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Development of a new preference-based instrument to measure dependency. (2013). Sampayo, Antonio ; Rodríguez Míguez, Eva ; ABELLAN-PERPIÑAN, JOSE-MARIA ; Jose Maria Abellan Perpiñan, ; Jose Manuel Gonzalez Martinez, ; Jose Carlos alvarez Villamarin, ; Miguez, Eva Rodriguez .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:vig:wpaper:1301.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The impact of using different tariffs to value EQ-5D health state descriptions: an example from a study of acute cough/lower respiratory tract infections in seven countries. (2013). Oppong, Raymond ; Hood, Kerenza ; Coast, Joanna ; Nuttall, Jacqueline ; Kaambwa, Billingsley ; Smith, Richard.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:14:y:2013:i:2:p:197-209.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Body weight and health-related quality of life in Catalonia, Spain. (2013). oliva, juan ; Oliva-Moreno, Juan ; Gil-Lacruz, Ana.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:14:y:2013:i:1:p:95-105.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Dealing with the health state ‘dead’ when using discrete choice experiments to obtain values for EQ-5D-5L heath states. (2013). Herdman, Michael ; Errea, Maria ; Ramos-Goi, Juan ; Cabases, Juan ; Stolk, Elly ; Rivero-Arias, Oliver.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:14:y:2013:i:1:p:33-42.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Quality of life lost due to non‐fatal road traffic injuries. (2012). Herrero, Carmen ; Cubi-Molla, Patricia ; CubiMolla, Patricia .
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:21:y:2012:i:5:p:528-550.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. LOWERING THE ‘FLOOR’ OF THE SF‐6D SCORING ALGORITHM USING A LOTTERY EQUIVALENT METHOD. (2012). Sanchez Martinez, Fernando Ignacio ; Jose Maria Abellan Perpiñan, ; Jorge Eduardo Martinez Perez, ; Mendez, Ildefonso ; Sanchezmartinez, Fernando Ignacio.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:21:y:2012:i:11:p:1271-1285.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Comparison between EQ-5D and SF-6D Utility in Rural Residents of Jiangsu Province, China. (2012). Liu, Pei ; Tian, Lin ; Chao, Jianqian ; Jin, Hui ; Wang, Bei ; Gao, Qian.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0041550.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Whiners and deniers – What does self-rated health measure?. (2012). Asada, Yukiko ; Kephart, George ; Layes, Audrey .
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:75:y:2012:i:1:p:1-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Inverse probability weighted estimation of social tariffs: An illustration using the SF-6D value sets. (2011). Sanchez Martinez, Fernando Ignacio ; Mendez, Ildefonso ; ABELLAN-PERPIÑAN, JOSE-MARIA ; Sánchez Martínez, Fernando I., ; Martínez Pérez, Jorge E., ; Mndez, Ildefonso ; Abellán Perpiñán, Jose M., .
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:30:y:2011:i:6:p:1280-1292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. A social preference valuations set for EQ-5D health states in Flanders, Belgium. (2010). Cleemput, Irina.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:11:y:2010:i:2:p:205-213.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Statistical Analysis of EQ-5D Profiles: Does the Use of Value Sets Bias Inference?. (2010). Rice, Nigel ; Parkin, David ; Devlin, Nancy.
    In: Medical Decision Making.
    RePEc:sae:medema:v:30:y:2010:i:5:p:556-565.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Scaling methods for categorical self-assessed health measures. (2010). Cubi-Molla, Patricia ; CubiMolla, Patricia .
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2010-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. A comparison of the performance of the EQ‐5D and SF‐6D for individuals aged ≥ 45 years. (2008). Muir, Kenneth R. ; Barton, Garry R. ; Whynes, David K. ; Jenkinson, Claire ; Avery, Anthony J. ; Sach, Tracey H. ; Doherty, Michael.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:17:y:2008:i:7:p:815-832.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Measuring Preferences for Cost-Utility Analysis. (2007). McDonough, Christine ; Tosteson, Anna .
    In: PharmacoEconomics.
    RePEc:spr:pharme:v:25:y:2007:i:2:p:93-106.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Modelling the 5-year cost effectiveness of tiotropium, salmeterol and ipratropium for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Spain. (2007). Molken, Maureen Rutten-Van ; Miravitlles, Marc ; Oostenbrink, Jan ; Monz, Brigitta .
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:8:y:2007:i:2:p:123-135.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. A comparison of United States and United Kingdom EQ-5D health states valuations using a nonparametric Bayesian method. (2007). Brazier, John ; Kharroubi, S A ; O'Hagan, A.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:29806.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Valuing EQ-5D health states: A review and analysis, CHERE Working Paper 2007/9. (2007). Viney, Rosalie ; Norman, Richard ; Brazier, John ; Cronin, Paula ; King, Madeleine ; Ratcliffe, Julie ; Street, Deborah.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:her:chewps:2007/9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ‐5D valuation studies. (2006). P. F. M. Stalmeier, ; P. F. M. Krabbe, ; Lamers, L. M. ; McDonnell, J. ; J. J. V. Busschbach, .
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:15:y:2006:i:10:p:1121-1132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. A comparison of individual and social time trade-off values for health states in the general population. (2006). Johannesson, Magnus ; Burstrom, Kristina ; Diderichsen, Finn.
    In: Health Policy.
    RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:76:y:2006:i:3:p:359-370.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Modelling EuroQol health‐related utility values for diabetic complications from CODE‐2 data. (2005). Beale, Sophie ; Bagust, Adrian.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:14:y:2005:i:3:p:217-230.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Current state of the art in preference-based measures of health and avenues for further research. (2005). Brazier, John.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:29762.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Measuring Changes in Health Capital. (2005). Labeaga, Jose ; Oliver, Xisco ; Spadaro, Amedeo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fda:fdaddt:2005-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. A comparison of the EQ‐5D and SF‐6D across seven patient groups. (2004). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Roberts, Jennifer ; Brazier, John ; Busschbach, Jan.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:873-884.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. A single European currency for EQ-5D health states. (2003). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Parkin, David ; Greiner, Wolfgang ; Sintonen, Harri ; Weijnen, Tom ; Charro, Frank ; Oppe, Siem ; Ohinmaa, Arto ; Krabbe, Paul ; Kind, Paul ; Dolan, Paul ; Roset, Montserat ; Nieuwenhuizen, Martin ; Buxton, Martin ; Badia, Xavier ; Busschbach, Jan.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:4:y:2003:i:3:p:222-231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-19 10:10:41 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.