This document has not been cited yet.

1. Bateman I.J., Carson R., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., Jone-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Ozdemiroglu E., Pearce D., Sugden R. and Swanson J. (2002). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

2. Bateman I.J., Mace G.M., Fezzi C., Atkinson G. and Turner R.K. (2011). Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48(2): 177-218.

3. Baumol W.J. and Oates W.E. (1988). The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Brown L.E., Hannah D.M. and Milner A.M. (2007). Vulnerability of alpine stream biodiversity to shrinking glaciers and snow-packs. Global Change Biology, 13: 958-966.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Céréghino R., Cugny P. and Lavandier P. (2002). Influence of intermittent hydro-peaking on the longitudinal zonation patterns of benthic invertebrates in a mountain stream. International Review of Hydrobiology, 87: 47-60.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. De Carli A. (ed.) (2014). IDEA – Idroelettrico: Economia e Ambiente. Rapporto per la Provincia di Sondrio.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Ekins P. (1999). European environmental taxes and charges: recent experience, issues and trends. Ecological Economics, 31: 39-62.

8. Fiebig D.G., Keane M.P., Louviere J. and Wasi N. (2009). The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 29(3), 393-421.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

9. Gu Y., Hole A.R. and Knox S. (2013). Fitting the generalized multinomial logit model Stata. Stata Journal, 13(2): 382-397.

10. Han S.Y., Kwak S.J. and Yoo S.H. (2008). Valuing environmental impacts of large dam construction in Korea: An application of choice experiments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(4): 256-266.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Hole A.R. and Kolstad J.R. (2012). Mixed logit estimation of willingness to pay distributions: a comparison of models in preference and WTP space using data from a health-related choice experiment. Empirical Economics, 42(2): 445-469.

12. Hoyos D. (2010). The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments. Ecological Economics, 69: 1595-1603.

13. Kataria M. (2009). Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in hydropower regulated rivers. Energy Economics, 31: 69-76.

14. Kataria M., Bateman I., Christensen T., Dubgaard A., Hasler B., Hime S., Ladenburg J., Levin G., Martinsen L. and Nissen C. (2012). Scenario realism and welfare estimate in choice experiments – a non-market valuation study on the European Water Framework Directive. Journal of Environmental Management, 94: 25-33.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Klinglmair A., Bliem M.G. and Brouwer R. (2015). Exploring the public value of increased hydropower use: a choice experiment study for Austria. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(3): 315-336.

16. Lancsar E. and Louviere J. (2008). Estimating individual level discrete choice models and welfare measures using best-worst choice experiments and sequential best-worst MNL. University of Technology, Centre for the Study of Choice (Censoc), 08-004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Li X.J., Zhang J. and Xu L.Y. (2015). An evaluation of ecological losses from hydropower development in Tibet. Ecological Engeneering, 76: 178-185.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Massarutto A. and Pontoni F. (2015). Rent seizing and environmental concerns: a parametric valuation of the Italian hydropower sector. Energy Policy, 78: 31-40.

19. McFadden D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P. (ed.). Frontiers in econometrics. New York: AcademicPress, 105-142.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Meijer E. and Rouwendal J. (2006). Measuring welfare effects in models with random coefficients. Journal of Applied Economics, 21(2): 227-244.

21. Nilsson C. (1996). Remediating river margin vegetation along fragmented and regulated rivers in the north: what is possible? Regulated Rivers Research & Management, 12: 415-431.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. OECD (2014). The Political Economy of Environmentally Related Taxes. Paris.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. Pontoni F., De Carli A., Goltara A. and Massarutto A. (2014). Hydropower production and environmental regulation: opting for a performance-based tax approach. Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment, 2: 137-152.

24. Renofalt B.M., Jansson R. and Nilsson C. (2010). Effects of hydropower generation and opportunities for environmental flow management in Swedish riverine ecosystems. Freshwater Biology, 55 (1): 49-67.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. Scarpa R., Thiene M. and Train K. (2008). Utility in willingness to pay space: a tool to address confounding random scale effects in destination choice to the Alps. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(4): 994-1010.

26. Sonnier G., Ainslie A. and Otter T. (2007). Heterogeneity distributions of willingness-to-pay in choice models. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 5(3): 313-3.

27. Sundqvist T. (2002). Quantifying Household Preferences over the Environmental Impacts of Hydropower in Sweden: A Choice Experiment Approach. Power Generation Choice in the Presence of Environmental Externalities, Doctoral Thesis, Lulea University of Technology.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Tabi A. and Wüstenhagen R. (2017). Keep it Local and Fish-Friendly: Social acceptance of hydropower projects in Switzerland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68: 763-773.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. TEEB (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Tempesta T. and Vecchiato D. (2013). Riverscape and Groundwater Preservation: A Choice Experiment. Environmental Management, 52(6): 1487-1502.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Train K. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, New York.

32. Train K. and Weeks M. (2005). Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to-Pay Space. In Scarpa R. and Alberini A. (eds.). Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics. Springer Netherlands, 6: 1-16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Vega D.C. and Alpízar F. (2011). Choice experiments in environmental impact assessment: the case of the Toro 3 hydroelectric project and the Recreo Verde tourist center in Costa Rica. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 29(4): 252-262.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Yu B., Xu L. and Wang X. (2016). Ecological compensation for hydropower resettlement in a reservoir wetland based on welfare change in Tibet, China, Ecological Engeneering, 96: 128-136.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. QUALITY OF LIFE FOR OCCUPATIONAL RISKS OF COCOA FARM WORKERS IN NIGERIA. (2021). Okoji, Luke ; Akerele, Dare ; Fadiji, Damilare.
   In: Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE).
   RePEc:ags:roaaec:310314.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Herausforderung Climate Engineering: Bewertung neuer Optionen für den Klimaschutz. (2016). Rickels, Wilfried ; Goeschl, Timo ; Dovern, Jonas ; Matzner, Nils ; Scheffran, Jurgen ; Klepper, Gernot ; Heyen, Daniel ; Barben, Daniel ; Maas, Achim ; Harnisch, Sebastian ; Janich, Nina.
   In: Kieler Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik.
   RePEc:zbw:ifwkbw:8.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Non-trading behaviour in choice experiments. (2016). Ahlheim, Michael ; Neidhardt, Jan.
   In: Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
   RePEc:zbw:hohdps:012016.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Using stated preference methods to assess environmental impacts of forest biomass power plants in Portugal. (2016). Valente, Marieta ; Pinto, Ligia ; Lourenço-Gomes, Lina ; Botelho, Anabela ; Loureno-Gomes, Lina ; Sousa, Sara.
   In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
   RePEc:spr:endesu:v:18:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-016-9795-6.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Economic Analysis of Flood Adaptation Options in the Sta. Cruz River Watershed, Laguna, Philippines. (2016). Dorado, Rowena A ; Emilinda, Maria ; Vicente, J R ; Bayani, Jaimie Kim ; Burgos, Bessie M.
   In: EEPSEA Research Report.
   RePEc:eep:report:rr20160336.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Latent preferences of residents regarding an urban forest recreation setting in Ljubljana, Slovenia. (2016). Mavsar, Robert ; Kova, Marko ; Juvani, Luka ; Hodges, Donald ; Japelj, Ane.
   In: Forest Policy and Economics.
   RePEc:eee:forpol:v:71:y:2016:i:c:p:71-79.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Shedding light on the self-consumption value of recreational hunting in European Mediterranean forests. (2016). Soliño, Mario ; Campos, Pablo ; Solio, Mario ; Martinez-Jauregui, Maria ; Herruzo, Casimiro A.
   In: Forest Policy and Economics.
   RePEc:eee:forpol:v:69:y:2016:i:c:p:83-89.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Korean publics preference for supply security of oil and gas and the impact of protest bidders. (2016). Kim, Yoon Kyung.
   In: Energy Policy.
   RePEc:eee:enepol:v:89:y:2016:i:c:p:202-213.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Assessing the potential for niche market development to contribute to farmers livelihoods and agrobiodiversity conservation: Insights from the finger millet case study in Nepal. (2016). Pallante, Giacomo ; Sthapit, Sajal ; Drucker, Adam G.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:130:y:2016:i:c:p:92-105.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Modeling individual preferences for energy sources: The case of IV generation nuclear energy in Italy. (2016). Strazzera, Elisabetta ; Mourato, Susana ; Contu, Davide.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:127:y:2016:i:c:p:37-58.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Democratic valuation (DV): Using majority voting principles to value public services. (2016). Schläpfer, Felix ; Schlapfer, Felix.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:122:y:2016:i:c:p:36-42.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Serial non-participation and ecosystem services providers’ preferences towards incentive-based schemes. (2016). Rodríguez-Entrena, Macario ; Glenk, Klaus ; Rodriguez-Entrena, M ; Villanueva, Anastasio J.
    In: 90th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2016, Warwick University, Coventry, UK.
    RePEc:ags:aesc16:236348.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Latent characteristics and preferences for income redistribution. (2015). Schmid, Andreas ; Pfarr, Christian ; Mørkbak, Morten.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc15:113001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Development of an integrated methodology for the sustainableenvironmental and socio-economic management of river ecosystems. (2015). Souliotis, Ioannis ; Koundouri, Phoebe ; Skianis, V ; Pergamalis, V ; Rault, Ker P.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:64458.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Consumers’ willingness to pay for renewable energy: A meta-regression analysis. (2015). Polyakov, Maksym ; Rogers, Abbie ; Ma, Chunbo ; Kragt, Marit ; Pandit, Ram ; Chalak, Morteza ; Gibson, Fiona ; Zhang, Fan ; Tapsuwan, Sorada.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:42:y:2015:i:c:p:93-109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Conservation of maritime cultural heritage: A discrete choice experiment in a European Atlantic Region. (2015). Vázquez Rodríguez, María Xosé ; Duran, Roi ; Vazquez, Maria Xose ; Farizo, Begoa A.
    In: Marine Policy.
    RePEc:eee:marpol:v:51:y:2015:i:c:p:356-365.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Adoption of Recirculating Aquaculture Systems in Pangasius Farms: A Choice Experiment. (2015). Le, Tru ; Bosma, Roel ; Ngoc, Pham Thi ; Meuwissen, Miranda ; Verreth, Johan .
    In: 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:iaae15:212632.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Farmres Perceived Cost of Land Use restrictions: A Simulated Purchasing Decision Using Dscrete Choice Experiments. (2015). van Passel, Steven ; Lizin, Sebastien ; Schreurs, Eloi .
    In: 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:iaae15:212054.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Households Water Use Demand and Willingness to Pay for Improved Water Services: A Case Study of Semi-Urban Areas in the Lubombo and Lowveld Regions of Swaziland. (2015). Dlamini, Nqobizwe Mvangeli .
    In: Research Theses.
    RePEc:ags:cmpart:243464.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Willingness to pay for green power in an unreliable electricity sector: Part 1. The case of the Lebanese residential sector. (2014). Harajli, Hassan ; Dagher, Leila.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:116121.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Willingness to contribute to the management of recreational quality on private lands in Finland. (2014). Sievanen, Tuija ; Lankia, Tuija ; Neuvonen, Marjo ; Pouta, Eija.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:20:y:2014:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Valuing the benefits of an afforestation project in a peri-urban area with choice experiments. (2013). Vecchiato, Daniel ; Tempesta, T..
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:26:y:2013:i:c:p:111-120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Renewables portfolio, individual preferences and social values towards RES technologies. (2013). Skourtos, Michalis ; Tourkolias, Christos ; Kontogianni, Areti.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:55:y:2013:i:c:p:467-476.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries. (2013). Raghu, Prabhakaran ; Pascual, Unai ; Krishna, Vijesh ; King, Edwin Devarathna Israel ; King, E. D. Israel Oliver, ; Drucker, Adam G..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:87:y:2013:i:c:p:110-123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Agricultural Conservation Measures – Suggestions for their Improvement. (2013). Hampicke, Ulrich.
    In: Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development.
    RePEc:ags:joiatd:232341.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Basic Functions for Supporting an Implementation of Choice Experiments in R. (2012). Aizaki, Hideo.
    In: Journal of Statistical Software.
    RePEc:jss:jstsof:v:050:c02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Cost–Benefit Analysis and Distributional Preferences. (2012). Bennett, Jeff ; Scarborough, Helen.
    In: Books.
    RePEc:elg:eebook:14376.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Adaptation to Climate Change: Formulating Policy under Uncertainty. (2012). Dobes, Leo.
    In: CCEP Working Papers.
    RePEc:een:ccepwp:1201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Generating electricity with forest biomass: Consistency and payment timeframe effects in choice experiments. (2012). Vázquez Rodríguez, María Xosé ; Soliño, Mario ; Prada Blanco, Albino ; Solio, Mario ; Vazquez, Maria X. ; Farizo, Begoa A..
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:41:y:2012:i:c:p:798-806.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Directional heterogeneity in WTP models for environmental valuation. (2012). Schaafsma, Marije ; Rose, John ; Brouwer, Roy.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:79:y:2012:i:c:p:21-31.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Sustainable agricultural management contracts: Using choice experiments to estimate the benefits of land preservation and conservation practices. (2012). Johnston, Robert ; Duke, Joshua ; Absetz, Sarah ; Borchers, Allison M..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:74:y:2012:i:c:p:95-103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Protester or non-protester: a binary state? on the use (and non-use) of latent class models to analyse protesting in economic valuation. (2012). Meyerhoff, Jürgen ; Bartczak, Anna ; Liebe, Ulf.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:211675.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless. (2012). Hausman, Jerry.
    In: Journal of Economic Perspectives.
    RePEc:aea:jecper:v:26:y:2012:i:4:p:43-56.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. The Value of a Statistical Life. (2011). Treich, Nicolas ; Andersson, Henrik.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:12679_17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Provided and perceived status quo in choice experiments: Implications for valuing the outputs of multifunctional rural areas. (2011). Soliño, Mario ; Solio, Mario ; Domnguez-Torreiro, Marcos .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:70:y:2011:i:12:p:2523-2531.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Operationalising active involvement in the EU Water Framework Directive: Why, when and how?. (2011). Wright, Stuart A. L., ; Fritsch, Oliver.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:70:y:2011:i:12:p:2268-2274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Ecosystem Service Valuation of Ruil (Nothofagus Alessandrii) Forests in Central Chile: An Application of the Choice Experiment Method. (2010). Villalobos, Pablo ; Huenchuleo, Carlos.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:13208_9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Using Choice Experiments to Estimate Wetland Values in Viet Nam: Implementation and Practical Issues. (2010). Do, Thang Nam ; Bennett, Jeff.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:13208_3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Farm Animal Welfare, Consumer Willingness to Pay, and Trust: Results of a Cross-National Survey. (2010). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Nocella, Giuseppe ; Hubbard, Lionel J..
    In: 2010 Conference, August 26-27, 2010, Nelson, New Zealand.
    RePEc:ags:nzar10:96832.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Is it Who You Ask or How You Ask? Findings of a Meta-Analysis on Genetically Modified Food Valuation Studies. (2008). Dannenberg, Astrid.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:7470.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. La méthode des choix multi-attributs appliquée aux Monts d’Arrée. (2007). Dachary-Bernard, Jeanne.
    In: Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales.
    RePEc:rae:jouces:v:84-85:y:2007:p:133-166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Eco-driving? A discrete choice experiment on valuation of car attributes. (2007). Hogberg, Martina.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:vtiwps:2007_013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. La méthode des choix multi-attributs appliquée aux Monts d’Arrée. (2007). Dachary-Bernard, Jeanne.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01201152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Valuing the Cultural Monuments of Armenia: Bayesian Updating of Prior Beliefs in Contingent Valuation. (2007). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2007.36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. La méthode des choix multi-attributs appliquée aux Monts d’Arrée. (2007). Dachary-Bernard, Jeanne.
    In: Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR).
    RePEc:ags:inrace:189743.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Imprecision as an Account of the Preference Reversal Phenomenon. (2007). Loomes, Graham ; Butler, David.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:97:y:2007:i:1:p:277-297.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Non-Economic Motivation for Contingent Values: Rights and Attitudinal Beliefs in the Willingness To Pay for Environmental Improvements. (2006). Spash, Clive.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:82:y:2006:i:4:p:602-622.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. The value of improved road safety. (2006). Hultkrantz, Lars ; Lindberg, Gunnar ; Andersson, Camilla.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:32:y:2006:i:2:p:151-170.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. VALORACIÓN ECONÓMICA DE LA PREVENCIÓN PÚBLICA DE LA MALARIA EN LOS HOGARES DEL CAQUETÁ. (2006). Rosales Alvarez, Ramón ; Vargas, Carol.
    In: Documentos CEDE.
    RePEc:col:000089:003749.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Contingent Valuation and Lost Passive Use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. (2003). Ruud, Paul ; Kopp, Raymond ; Hanemann, Michael ; Carson, Richard.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:25:y:2003:i:3:p:257-286.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-03 23:37:18 || Missing content? Let us know