1. Impact of Currency Union on Trade: Comparative Analysis of EMU and SACU - Gravity Model Approach. (2018). Kuso, Yasin.
   In: Academic Journal of Economic Studies.
   RePEc:khe:scajes:v:4:y:2018:i:4:p:102-115.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Trade Impacts of Agricultural Support in the EU. (2017). Scoppola, Margherita ; Salvatici, Luca ; Matthews, Alan.
   In: Commissioned Papers.
   RePEc:ags:iatrcp:252767.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. EU preferences for agri-food products from developing countries- winning and losing due to the EU GSP reform 2013. (2015). Rau, Marie-Luise ; Drogué, Sophie ; Demaria, Federica.
   In: 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy.
   RePEc:ags:iaae15:211568.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. ———. 2006. The Log of Gravity.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 88: 641–658.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. ———. 2011. “EU Preferential Margins: Measurement and Aggregation Issues.” In The Trade Impact of European Union Preferential Policies: An Analysis through Gravity Models, edited by L. De Benedictis and L. Salvatici, 37–54. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. ———. 2011. “Further Simulation Evidence of the Performance of the Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Estimator.” Economics Letters 112: 220–222.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. ———. 2011. “Preferential Trade Agreements Granted by the European Union: An Application of the Gravity Model Using Monthly Data.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 38 (4): 553–586.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. ———. 2012. Gold Standard Gravity. Working Paper no. 17835. Cambridge, MA, US: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Aiello, F., and P. Cardamone. 2011.” Analysing the Impact of Everything but Arms Initiative Using a Gravity Model.” In The Trade Impact of European Union Preferential Policies: An Analysis through Gravity Models, edited by L. De Benedictis and L. Salvatici, 127–150. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer: Aiello, F., and F. Demaria. 2012. “Do Trade Preferential Agreements Enhance The Exports Of Developing Countries? Evidence from the EU GSP.” Economia Internazionale / International Economics, 65, (3): 371-402.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Alchian, A., and W. R. Allen. 1983. Exchange and Production: Competition, Coordination and Control. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Anderson, J. 2009. Gravity, Productivity and the Pattern of Production and Trade. Working Paper no. 14642. Cambridge, MA, US: National Bureau of Economic Research.

9. Anderson, J., and E. van Wincoop. 2003. “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle.” American Economic Review 93: 170–192.

10. Anderson, J., and Y. Yotov. 2011. Terms of Trade and Global Efficiency Effects of Free Trade Agreements, 1990–2002. Working Paper no. 17003. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

11. Baier, S. L., and J. H. Bergstrand. 2007. “Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Membersʹ International Trade?” Journal of International Economics 71 (1): 72–95.

12. Baldwin, R., and D. Taglioni. 2006. Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations. Working Paper no. 12516 Cambridge, MA, US: National Bureau of Economic Research.

13. Baldwin, R., F. Skudelny, and D. Taglioni. 2005. Trade Effects of the Euro: Evidence from Sectoral Data. Working Paper Series 446. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.

14. Borchert, I. 2009. Trade Diversion under Selective Preferential Market Access. Policy Research Working Paper no. 4710. Washington, DC: World Bank.

15. Bouët, A., Y. Decreux, L. Fontagné, S. Jean, and D. Laborde. 2008. “Assessing Applied Protection across the World.” Review of International Economics 16 (5): 850–863.

16. Boumelassa, H., D. Laborde, and C. Mitaritonna. 2009. A Consistent Picture of the Protection across the World in 2004: MAcMapHS6 version 2. CEPII Working Paper 2009–22, September.

17. Brenton, P., and M. Manchin. 2003. “Making EU Trade Agreements Work: The Role of Rules of Origin.” The World Economy 26 (5): 755–769.

18. Bureau, J. C., R. Chakir, and J. Gallezot. 2007. “The Utilization of Trade Preferences for Developing Countries in the Agri-Food Sector.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 58 (2): 175–198.

19. Burger, M., F. Van Oort, and G. J. Linders. 2009. “On the Specification of the Gravity Model of Trade: Zeros, Excess Zeros and Zero-Inflated Estimation.” Spatial Economic Analysis 4 (2, June): 167-190.

20. Caporale, G. M., C. Rault, R. Sova, and A. Sova. 2009. “On the Bilateral Trade Effects of Free Trade Agreements between the EU-15 and the CEEC-4 Countries.” Review of World Economy 145: 189–206.

21. Cardamone, P. 2007. “A Survey of the Assessments of the Effectiveness of Preferential Trade Agreements using Gravity Models.” Economia Internazionale / International Economics 60 (4): 421–473.

22. Carrère, C., J. De Melo, and B. Tumurchudur. 2010. “Disentangling Market Access Effects of Preferential Trading Arrangements with an Application for ASEAN Members under an ASEAN–EU FTA.” The World Economy 33 (1): 42–59.

23. Cipollina, M., and F. Pietrovito. 2011. “Trade Impact of EU Preferential Policies: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature.” In The Trade Impact of European Union Preferential Policies: An Analysis through Gravity Models, edited by L. De Benedictis and L. Salvatici, 91–109. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Cipollina, M., and L. Salvatici. 2010. “The Impact of European Union Agricultural Preferences.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 13 (1): 87–106.

25. Cirera, X., F. Foliano, and M. Gasiorek. 2011. The Impact of GSP Preferences on Developing Countries' Exports in the European Union: Bilateral Gravity Modelling at the Product Level. Economics Department Working Paper Series, no. 27-2011. University of Sussex.

26. Corbo, V., and C. Osbat. 2013. Trade Adjustment in the European Union. A Structural Estimation Approach. Working Paper Series, no. 1535. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.

27. De Benedictis, L., and L. Salvatici, ed. 2011. The Trade Impact of European Union Preferential Policies: An Analysis through Gravity Models. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

28. Deaton, A. 2010. “Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development.” Journal of Economic Literature 48: 424–455.

29. Emlinger, C., F. Jacquet, and E. Chevassus-Lozza. 2008. “Tariffs and Other Trade Costs: Assessing Obstacles to Mediterranean Countries’ Access to EU15 Fruit and Vegetable Markets.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 35 (4): 409–438.

30. Fally, T. 2012. Structural Gravity and Fixed Effects. Working Paper. University of Colorado-Boulder. http://spot.colorado.edu/~fally/Gravity_PPML.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Feenstra, R. C., M. Obstfeld, and K. N. Russ. 2012. In Search of the Armington Elasticity. Department of Economics Working Paper. University of California at Davis.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Francois, J., B. Hoekman, and M. Manchin. 2006. “Preference Erosion and Multilateral Trade Liberalization.” The World Bank Economic Review 20 (2): 197–216.

33. Fugazza, M., and A. Nicita. 2013. “The Direct and Relative Effects of Preferential Market Access.” Journal of International Economics 89 (2): 357–368.

34. Gradeva, K., and I. Martinez-Zarzoso. 2009. Trade as Aid: The Role of the EBA-Trade Preferences Regime in the Development Strategy. Ibero American Institute for Economic Research (IAI) Discussion Paper no. 197. University of Goettingen.

35. Head, K., and T. Mayer. 2013. “Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit, and Cookbook.” In Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 4, edited by G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, and K. Rogoff. Elsevier, 131–195. Oxford, UK: North Holland.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Hillberry, R., and D. Hummels. 2012. “Trade Elasticity Parameters for a CGE Model.” In Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edited by P. Dixon and D. Jorgenson 1213–129. Oxford, UK: North Holland.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Hoekman, B., and A. Nicita. 2011. “Trade Policy, Trade Costs, and Developing Country Trade.” World Development 39 (12): 2069–2079.

38. Imbs, J., and I. Méjean. 2009. Elasticity Optimism. IMF Working Paper Series, 09/279. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Inama, S. 2003. “Trade Preferences and the World Trade Organization Negotiations on Market Access: Battling for Compensation of Erosion of GSP, ACP and Other Trade Preferences or Assessing and Improving Their Utilization and Value by Addressing Rules of Origin and Graduation?” Journal of World Trade 37 (5): 959– 976.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Low, P., R. Piermartini, and J. Richtering. 2008. “Multilateral Solutions to the Erosion of Non-Reciprocal Preferences in NAMA.” In Trade Preference Erosion, edited by B. Hoekman, W. Martin, and C. Primo Braga, 277–356. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan; Washington DC: World Bank.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

41. Manchin, M. 2006. Preference Utilisation and Tariff Reduction in EU Imports from ACP Countries. The World Economy, 29 (9): 1243–1266.

42. Martinez-Zarzoso, I., D. F. Nowak-Lehmann, and N. Horsewood. 2009. “Are Regional Trading Agreements Beneficial? Static and Dynamic Panel Gravity Models.” North American Journal of Economics and Finance 20: 46–65.

43. Nielsen, C. P. 2003. Regional and Preferential Trade Agreements: A Literature Review and Identification of Future Steps. Report 155. Copenhagen: Fodevare Okonomisk Institut.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Nilsson, L. 2002. “Trading Relations: Is the Roadmap from Lomé to Cotonou Correct?” Applied Economics 34: 439– 452.

45. Nilsson, L., and N. Matsson. 2009. Truths and Myths about the Openness of EU Trade Policy and the Use of EU Trade Preferences. Nijkamp Poot Working Paper. Brussels: DG Trade European Commission.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Oguledo, V. I., and C. R. MacPhee. 1994. “Gravity Models: A Reformulation and an Application to Discriminatory Trade Arrangements.” Applied Economics 26 (2): 107–120.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Ossa, R. 2012. Why Trade Matters After All. Working Paper no. 18113. Cambridge, UK: National Bureau of Economic Research.

48. Persson, M. 2012. From Trade Preferences to Trade Facilitation: Taking Stock of the Issues. Economics. The OpenAccess, Open-Assessment E-Journal 6: 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-17.

49. Pishbahar, E., and M. Huchet-Bourdon. 2008. European Union’s Preferential Trade Agreements in Agricultural Sector: A Gravity Approach.” Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development 5 (1): 93–114.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Raimondi, V., M. Scoppola, and A. Olper. 2011. “Trade Preference through Tariff Rate Quotas and the Gravity Equation: Does the Tariff Equivalent Matter?” In The Trade Impact of European Union Preferential Policies: An Analysis Through Gravity Models, edited by L. De Benedictis and L. Salvatici, 183–204. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

51. Ruiz, J. M., and J. M. Villarubia. 2007. The Wise Use of Dummies in Gravity Models: Export Potentials in the Euromed Region. Documentos de Trabajo no. 0720. Madrid: Banco de Espana Eurosistema.

52. Samuelson, P. 1952. The Transfer Problem and Transport Costs: The Terms of Trade When Impediments Are Absent. Economic Journal 62 (246): 278–304.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Santos Silva, J. M. C., S. Tenreyro, and K. Wei. 2013. Estimating the Extensive Margin of Trade. Department of Economics, Discussion Paper no. 721. University of Essex.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
54. Santos-Silva, J. C. M., and S. Tenreyro. 2003. Gravity-Defying Trade.” Unpublished, Portugal, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

55. Sapir, A. 1981. “Trade Benefits under the EEC Generalized System of Preferences.” European Economic Review 15 (3): 339–355.

56. Silverstovs, B., and D. Schumacher. 2007. Estimating Gravity Model: To Log or Not to Log. Discussion Paper 739. Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research.

57. Tinbergen, J. 1946. “Some Measurements of Elasticities of Substitution.” Review of Economics and Statistics 28: 109–
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Machine Learning in International Trade Research ?- Evaluating the Impact of Trade Agreements. (2021). Zylkin, Thomas ; Santos Silva, João ; ruta, michele ; Breinlich, Holger ; Corradi, Valentina ; Rocha, Nadia.
   In: School of Economics Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:sur:surrec:0521.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The Log of Gravity At 15. (2021). Tenreyro, Silvana ; Santos Silva, João ; J. M. C. Santos Silva, .
   In: School of Economics Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:sur:surrec:0121.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Does the All-China Federation of Industry and Commerce Align Private Firms with the Goals of the Peoples Republic of Chinas Belt and Road Initiative?. (2020). Nugent, Jeffrey ; Lu, Jiaxuan.
   In: Asian Development Review.
   RePEc:tpr:adbadr:v:37:y:2020:i:2:p:45-76.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Geography Matters: Spatial Dimensions of Trade, Migration and Growth. (2019). Steinwachs, Thomas.
   In: ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung.
   RePEc:ces:ifobei:81.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. The tide that does not raise all boats: an assessment of EU preferential trade policies. (2017). Salvatici, Luca ; Laborde Debucquet, David ; Cipollina, Maria.
   In: Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv).
   RePEc:spr:weltar:v:153:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10290-016-0270-0.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Do Natural Hazards Cause International Migration?. (2017). Steinwachs, Thomas ; Groeschl, Jasmin ; Groschl, Jasmin.
   In: CESifo Economic Studies.
   RePEc:oup:cesifo:v:63:y:2017:i:4:p:445-480..

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Gravity Models of Trade: Unobserved Heterogeneity and Endogeneity. (2014). Konya, Laszlo ; Harris, Mark ; Greene, William ; Chan, Felix.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:ste:nystbu:14-08.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. The Tide That Does Not Raise All Boats: An Assessment of EU Preferential Trade Policies. (2014). Salvatici, Luca ; Laborde Debucquet, David ; Cipollina, Maria.
   In: Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre'.
   RePEc:rtr:wpaper:0194.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The Tide That Does Not Raise All Boats: An Assesment of EU Preferential Trade Policies. (2014). Salvatici, Luca ; Laborde Debucquet, David ; Cipollina, Maria.
   In: FOODSECURE Working papers.
   RePEc:fsc:fspubl:24.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. The tide that does not raise all boats: An assessment of EU preferential trade policies. (2014). Salvatici, Luca ; Laborde Debucquet, David ; Cipollina, Maria.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1382.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Icebergs versus Tariffs: A Quantitative Perspective on the Gains from Trade. (2013). Larch, Mario ; Jung, Benjamin ; Felbermayr, Gabriel.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc13:79707.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Gravity Model Applications and Macroeconomic Perspectives. (2013). Groschl, Jasmin Katrin.
    In: ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung.
    RePEc:ces:ifobei:48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. The Pure Effects of European Integration on Intra-EU Core and Periphery Trade. (2013). Pfaffermayr, Michael ; Egger, Peter.
    In: The World Economy.
    RePEc:bla:worlde:v:36:y:2013:i:6:p:701-712.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. The dynamic effects of a currency union on trade. (2012). Lin, Ching-Yi ; Bergin, Paul.
    In: Journal of International Economics.
    RePEc:eee:inecon:v:87:y:2012:i:2:p:191-204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Is the Growth of Regionalism as Significant as the Headlines Suggest? Lessons from Agricultural Trade. (2012). Grant, Jason.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:catpwp:142374.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Canadian Agrifood Export Performance and the Growth Potential of the BRICs and Next-11. (2012). Meilke, Karl ; Cairns, Alexander P..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:catpwp:142372.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Una evaluación de la estrategia comercial de Colombia a la luz de un Modelo de Equilibrio General Computable basado en la ecuación de gravedad.. (2011). DAJUD, Camilo UMAA .
    In: Archivos de Economía.
    RePEc:col:000118:008948.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Readdressing the trade effect of the Euro: Allowing for currency misalignment. (2010). Jung, Benjamin ; Hogrefe, Jan ; Kohler, Wilhelm.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:10023.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. The dark side of the generalized system of preferences. (2010). Wagner, Marco ; Herz, Bernhard.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:svrwwp:022010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Payment decoupling and the intra-European calf trade. (2010). Thompson, Stanley ; Brümmer, Bernhard ; Prehn, Soren ; Brummer, Bernhard.
    In: DARE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:daredp:1008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. The Trade Effects of Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements. (2010). Winkelmann, Rainer ; Staub, Kevin ; Larch, Mario ; Egger, Peter.
    In: SOI - Working Papers.
    RePEc:soz:wpaper:1013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Size, openness, and macroeconomic interdependence. (2010). Straub, Roland ; Chudik, Alexander.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecb:ecbwps:20101172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. The Trade Effects of Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements. (2010). Winkelmann, Rainer ; Staub, Kevin ; Larch, Mario ; Egger, Peter.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_3253.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Comparative advantage and skill-specific unemployment. (2009). Lechthaler, Wolfgang ; Larch, Mario.
    In: Kiel Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:1538.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. The long run-effects of the Poland’s accession to the eurozone. Simulation using POLDYN – a dynamic computable general equilibrium model. (2009). Hagemejer, Jan ; DARAS, Tomasz .
    In: NBP Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbp:nbpmis:70.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Comparative Advantage and Skill-Specific Unemployment. (2009). Lechthaler, Wolfgang ; Larch, Mario.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_2754.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Immigration Wave Effects on Canadas Trade Flows. (2008). Partridge, Jamie ; Furtan, Hartley.
    In: Canadian Public Policy.
    RePEc:cpp:issued:v:34:y:2008:i:2:p:193-214.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. The Trade and FDI Effects of EMU Enlargement. (2007). Paap, Richard ; Brouwer, Jelle ; Viaene, Jean-Marie.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20070077.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Proliferating Regional Trade Arrangements: Why and Whither?. (2005). Shin, Kwanho ; Park, Innwon ; Lee, Jong-Wha.
    In: International Trade.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0501010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Preference utilization and tariff reduction in European Union imports from African, Caribbean, and Pacific countries. (2005). Manchin, Miriam.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3688.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Trade Responses to Geographic Frictions: A Decomposition Using Micro-Data. (2005). Hummels, David ; Hillberry, Russell.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11339.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Evaluation of Exchange-Rate, Capital Market, and Dollarization Regimes in the Presence of Sudden Stops. (2005). Rubinstein, Yona ; Razin, Assaf.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Does the WTO Make Trade More Stable?. (2005). Rose, Andrew.
    In: Open Economies Review.
    RePEc:kap:openec:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:7-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Can the standard international business cycle model explain the relation between trade and comovement?. (2005). Yi, Kei-Mu ; Kose, Ayhan.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fip:fedpwp:05-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?. (2005). Bergstrand, Jeffrey ; Baier, Scott.
    In: FRB Atlanta Working Paper.
    RePEc:fip:fedawp:2005-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Trade and infrastructure: evidences from the Andean Community. (2005). Flôres Junior, Renato ; Calfat, German ; Renato Galv, ; Gina E. Acosta Rojas, .
    In: FGV EPGE Economics Working Papers (Ensaios Economicos da EPGE).
    RePEc:fgv:epgewp:580.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. The Log of Gravity. (2005). Tenreyro, Silvana ; Santos Silva, João.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:5311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. The Log of Gravity. (2005). Tenreyro, Silvana ; Santos Silva, João.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0701.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. The Costs of Remoteness: Evidence from German Division and Reunification. (2005). Sturm, Daniel ; Redding, Stephen.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0688.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. European Integration, FDI and the Internal Geography of Trade: Evidence from Western European Border Regions. (2005). Paluzie, Elisenda ; Lafourcade, Miren.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:bar:bedcje:2005145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Diffusion of ISO 9000 Standards and International Trade. (2004). Grajek, Michal.
    In: CIG Working Papers.
    RePEc:wzb:wzebiv:spii2004-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. On the conservation of distance in international trade. (2004). Freund, Caroline ; Berthelon, Matias.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3293.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Assessing the potential benefit of trade facilitation : A global perspective. (2004). Wilson, John ; Otsuki, Tsunehiro ; Mann, Catherine.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3224.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. On the geography of trade : distance is alive and well. (2004). Schiff, Maurice ; CARRERE, CELINE.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange. (2004). Zingales, Luigi ; Sapienza, Paola ; Guiso, Luigi.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11005.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. FDI in Space: Spatial Autoregressive Relationships in Foreign Direct Investment. (2004). Waddell, Glen ; Naughton, Helen ; Davies, Ronald ; Blonigen, Bruce.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10939.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Inequality, Nonhomothetic Preferences, and Trade: A Gravity Approach. (2004). Trindade, Vitor ; Mitra, Devashish ; Dalgin, Muhammed.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10800.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Fixed Exchange Rates and Trade. (2004). Shambaugh, Jay ; Klein, Michael.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10696.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Does the WTO Make Trade More Stable?. (2004). Rose, Andrew.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. The currency union effect on trade and the FDI channel. (2004). Lochard, Julie ; De Sousa, José.
    In: Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques.
    RePEc:mse:wpsorb:j04111.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

51. Growth-led exports: is variety the spice of trade?. (2004). Gagnon, Joseph.
    In: International Finance Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:fip:fedgif:822.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

52. Harmonization of Food Regulations and Trade in the Single Market : Evidence from Disaggregated Data. (2004). Mark, Vancauteren ; Bruno, HENRY DE FRAHAN, .
    In: LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES.
    RePEc:ctl:louvir:2004021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

53. Regional economic integration and the location of multinational enterprises.. (2004). Altomonte, Carlo.
    In: KITeS Working Papers.
    RePEc:cri:cespri:wp152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

54. On the Geography of Trade: Distance is Alive and Well. (2004). Schiff, Maurice ; CARRERE, CELINE.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cdi:wpaper:634.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

55. Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?. (2004). Rose, Andrew.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:94:y:2004:i:1:p:98-114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

56. Factor Proportions and the Structure of Commodity Trade. (2004). Romalis, John.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:94:y:2004:i:1:p:67-97.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

57. Income-related biases in international trade : what do trademark registration data tell us?. (2003). Spatareanu, Mariana ; Javorcik, Beata ; Fink, Carsten.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3150.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

58. Why are Americans More Productive than Canadians?. (2003). Sharpe, Andrew.
    In: International Productivity Monitor.
    RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:6:y:2003:2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

59. Competition Policy in Small Distant Open Economies: Some Lessons from the Economics Literature. (2003). Evans, Lewis ; Hughes, Patrick.
    In: Treasury Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:nzt:nztwps:03/31.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

60. Inequality and Trade. (2003). Trindade, Vitor ; Mitra, Devashish.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:10087.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

61. Disintegration and trade in South-eastern Europe. (2003). Lamotte, Olivier.
    In: Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques.
    RePEc:mse:wpsorb:j04031.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

62. How does the border affect productivity? evidence from American and Canadian manufacturing industries. (2003). Vigfusson, Robert.
    In: International Finance Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:fip:fedgif:788.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

63. On the trade impact of nominal exchange rate volatility. (2003). Tenreyro, Silvana.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fip:fedbwp:03-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

64. Exchange-Rate Regimes and International Trade: Evidence from the Classical Gold Standard Era. (2003). Meissner, Christopher ; Lopez-Cordova, Ernesto J..
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:93:y:2003:i:1:p:344-353.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

65. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Report date: 2025-09-26 18:59:15 || Missing content? Let us know