create a website

Anchoring bias in recall data: Evidence from Central America. (2016). Murphy, Mike ; Hernandez, Manuel ; Godlonton, Susan.
In: IFPRI discussion papers.
RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1534.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 3

Citations received by this document

Cites: 23

References cited by this document

Cocites: 21

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The impact of computer-assisted personal interviewing on survey duration, quality, and cost: Evidence from the Viet Nam Labor Force Survey. (2020). Rao, Lakshman Nagraj ; Roque, Jude David ; Gentile, Elisabetta ; Pipon, Dave ; Thu, Vu Thi.
    In: GLO Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:glodps:605.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Barriers to Mobility or Sorting? Sources and Aggregate Implications of Income Gaps across Sectors and Locations in Indonesia. (2019). Swiecki, Tomasz ; Pulido, Jose.
    In: 2019 Meeting Papers.
    RePEc:red:sed019:1298.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Not your average job: Measuring farm labor in Tanzania. (2018). Palacios-Lopez, Amparo ; De Weerdt, Joachim ; Beegle, Kathleen ; Arthi, Vellore.
    In: Journal of Development Economics.
    RePEc:eee:deveco:v:130:y:2018:i:c:p:160-172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. ———. 2015. “A Poverty-Sensitive Scorecard to Prioritize Lending: Evidence from Central America.” Unpublished, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Alevy, J., C. Landry, and J. A. List. 2011. Field Experiments of Anchoring of Economic Valuations. University of Alaska Working Paper 2011-02. Seattle, WA, US: University of Alaska.

  3. Ariely, D., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec. 2003. “‘Coherent Arbitrariness’: Stable Demand Curves without Stable Preferences.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 73–105.

  4. Beegle, K., C. Carletto, and K. Himelein. 2011. Reliability of Recall in Agricultural Data. World Bank Development Research Group Working Paper WPS5671. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  5. Beegle, K., J. de Weerd, J. Friedman, and J. Gibson. 2014. The Challenge of Measuring Hunger. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper WPS6736. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  6. Beggs, A., and K. Graddy. 2009. “Anchoring Effects: Evidence from Art Auctions.” American Economic Review 99 (3): 1027–1039.

  7. Bodenhausen, G. V., S. Gabriel, and M. Lineberger. 2000. “Sadness and Susceptibility to Judgemental Bias: The Case of Anchoring.” Psychological Science 11 (4): 320–323.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bound, J., C. Brown, and N. Mathiowetz. 2001. “Measurement Error in Survey Data.” In Handbook of Econometrics. Vol. 5, edited by J.J. Heckman and E. Leamer, 3705–3843. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Cameron, C., J. B. Gelbach, and D. L. Miller. 2008. “Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 90 (3): 414–427.

  10. Campbell, S. D., and S. A. Sharpe. 2009. “Anchoring Bias in Consensus Forecasts and Its Effect on Market Prices.” The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 44 (2): 369–390.

  11. de Nicola, F., and X. Giné. 2014. “How Accurate Is Recall Data? Evidence from Coastal India.” Journal of Development Economics 106: 55–65.

  12. Evans, D. S., and L. S. Leighton. 1995. “Retrospective Bias in the Displaced Worker Surveys.” The Journal of Human Resources 30 (2): 386–396.

  13. Frykblom, P., and J. F. Shogren. 2000. “An Experimental Testing of Anchoring Effects in Discrete Choice Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 16: 329–341.

  14. Fudenberg, D., D. K. Levine, and Z. Maniadis. 2012. “On the Robustness of Anchoring Effects in WTP and WTA Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4 (2): 131–145.

  15. Goldin, J., and D. Reck. 2015. “Framing Effects in Survey Research: Consistency-Adjusted Estimators.” Unpublished, Stanford Law School, CA, US.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Hernandez, M. A., and M. Torero. 2014. “Poverty-Sensitive Scorecards to Prioritize Lending and Grant Allocation with an Application in Central America.” In Finance for Food: Towards New Agricultural and Rural Finance, edited by Doris Köhn, 263–283, New York: Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Hurd, M. D., D. McFadden, H. Chand, L. Gan, A. Merrill, and M. Roberts. 1998. “Consumption and Savings Balances of the Elderly: Experimental Evidence on Survey Response Bias.” In Frontiers in the Economics of Aging, edited by D. A. Wise, 353–392. Cambridge, MA, US: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  18. Maniadis, Z., F. Tufano, and J. A. List. 2014. “One Swallow Doesn’t Make a Summer: New Evidence on Anchoring Effects.” American Economic Review 104 (1): 277–290.

  19. Maruyama, E. 2007. “Remembering Earnings During Unstable Times: Evidence from the Indonesian Family Life Surveys.” Unpublished, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Miguel, E., S. Satyanath, and E. Sergenti. 2004 “Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An Instrumental Variables Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 112 (4): 725–753.

  21. Sudman, S., N. M. Bradburn, and N. Schwarz. 1996. Thinking about Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science (185):1124– 1131.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Wilson, T. D., C. E. Houston, K. M. Etling, and N. Brekke. 1996. “A New Look at Anchoring Effects: Basic Anchoring and Its Antecedents.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 125 (4): 387–
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. 2021 Summary Data of Natural Field Experiments Published on Fieldexperiments.com. (2022). List, John.
    In: Natural Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:natura:00747.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Framed Field Experiments: 2021 Summary on Fieldexperiments.com. (2022). List, John.
    In: Framed Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:framed:00752.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. 2021 Summary Data of Artefactual Field Experiments Published on Fieldexperiments.com. (2021). List, John.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00749.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Anchoring bias in recall data: Evidence from Central America. (2016). Murphy, Mike ; Hernandez, Manuel ; Godlonton, Susan.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1534.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Can anchoring explain biased forecasts? Experimental evidence. (2016). Proeger, Till ; Meub, Lukas.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance.
    RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:12:y:2016:i:c:p:1-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Anchoring Effect in Context of a Familiar Good: A Case Study of Irrigation Water Supply in Rural India. (2015). Biswas, Durba.
    In: Bangladesh Development Studies.
    RePEc:ris:badest:0791.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. A Glimpse into the World of High Capacity Givers: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign. (2015). List, John ; Levitt, Steven ; Levin, Tova.
    In: Natural Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:natura:00409.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Behavioral Biases of Individual Investors: The Effect of Anchoring. (2015). Zaiane, Salma.
    In: Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences.
    RePEc:ejn:ejssjr:v:3:y:2015:i:1:p:13-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Anchoring in social context. (2015). Proeger, Till E. ; Meub, Lukas.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:55:y:2015:i:c:p:29-39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Learning how to choose—effects of instructional choice sets in discrete choice experiments. (2015). Meyerhoff, Jürgen ; Glenk, Klaus.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:41:y:2015:i:c:p:122-142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. An experimental study on social anchoring. (2014). Proeger, Till ; Meub, Lukas.
    In: University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:cegedp:196.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Are groups less behavioral? The case of anchoring. (2014). Proeger, Till ; Meub, Lukas.
    In: University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:cegedp:188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. One Swallow Doesnt Make a Summer: New Evidence on Anchoring Effects. (2014). Tufano, Fabio ; Maniadis, Zacharias ; List, John.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:104:y:2014:i:1:p:277-90.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Anchoring: A valid explanation for biased forecasts when rational predictions are easily accessible and well incentivized?. (2013). Proeger, Till ; Meub, Lukas ; Bizer, Kilian.
    In: University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:cegedp:166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. One Swallow Doesnt Make a Summer: New Evidence on Anchoring Effects. (2013). Tufano, Fabio ; Maniadis, Zacharias ; List, John.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:not:notcdx:2013-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Not all anchors are created equal. (2013). Zizzo, Daniel ; Sugden, Robert ; Zheng, Jiwei.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:39:y:2013:i:c:p:21-31.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The house doesn’t always win: Evidence of anchoring among Australian bookies. (2013). Moul, Charles ; McAlvanah, Patrick.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:90:y:2013:i:c:p:87-99.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. One Swallow Does not Make a Summer: New Evidence on Anchoring Effects. (2013). Maniadis, Zacharias ; List, John ; Tufano, Fabio.
    In: Levine's Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:cla:levarc:786969000000000824.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. On the Robustness of Anchoring Effects in WTP and WTA Experiments. (2012). Maniadis, Zacharias ; Levine, David ; Fudenberg, Drew.
    In: Scholarly Articles.
    RePEc:hrv:faseco:11005333.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. On the Robustness of Anchoring Effects in WTP and WTA Experiments. (2012). Maniadis, Zacharias ; Levine, David ; Fudenberg, Drew.
    In: American Economic Journal: Microeconomics.
    RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:131-45.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. How Much Does Expertise Reduce Behavioral Biases? The Case of Anchoring Effects in Stock Return Estimates. (2008). Puttonen, Vesa ; Kaustia, Markku ; Alho, Eeva.
    In: Financial Management.
    RePEc:bla:finmgt:v:37:y:2008:i:3:p:391-412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-02 02:59:25 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.