1. Womens access to agriculture extension amidst COVID-19: Insights from Gujarat, India and Dang, Nepal. (2021). Saini, Smriti ; Gupta, Shweta ; Barooah, Prapti ; Alvi, Muzna.
   In: Agricultural Systems.
   RePEc:eee:agisys:v:188:y:2021:i:c:s0308521x20308969.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. A study on productivity & empowerment of women intensive sericulture sector of West Bengal. (2020). Roy, Chandan ; Mukherjee, Sanchari Roy.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:106728.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. ———. 2012. “Valuing the Environment in Developing Countries: Modeling the Impact of Distrust in Public Authorities’ Ability to Deliver on the Citizens’ Willingness to Pay for Improved Environmental Quality.” Urban Water Journal 9 (4): 249–258.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Akter, S., T. J. Krupnik, F. Rossi, and F. Khanam. 2016. “The Influence of Gender and Product Design on Farmers’ Preference for Weather-Indexed Crop Insurance.” Global Environmental Change 38: 217–229.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Ali, A., O. Erenstein, and D. B. Rahut. 2014. “Impact of Direct Rice-Sowing Technology on Rice Producers’ Earnings: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan.” Development Studies Research: An Open Access Journal 1 (1): 244–254.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Alkire, S., R. Meinzen-Dick, A. Peterman, A. Quisumbing, G. Seymour, and A. Vaz. 2013. “The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index.” World Development 52: 71–91.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Arora-Jonsson, S. 2011. “Virtue and Vulnerability: Discourses on Women, Gender, and Climate Change.” Global Environmental Change 21 (2): 744–751.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Arora, A., S. Bansal, and P. S. Ward. 2015. Do Farmers Value Rice Varieties Tolerant to Droughts and Floods? Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Odisha, India. Working paper No. 204881 prepared for presentation at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association and Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, July 26–28.

7. Bell, A. R., M. Shah, and P. S. Ward. 2014. “Reimagining Cost Recovery in Pakistan’s Irrigation System Through Willingness‐to‐Pay Estimates for Irrigation Water from a Discrete Choice Experiment.” Water Resources Research 50 (8): 6679–6695.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Bennett, J., and R. Blamey, eds. 2001. The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

9. Birol, E., and S. Das. 2010. “Estimating the Value of Improved Wastewater Treatment: The Case of River Ganga, India.” Journal of Environmental Management 91 (11): 2163–2171.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Carlsson, F., and P. Martinsson. 2003. “Design Techniques for Stated Preference Methods in Health Economics.” Health Economics 12 (4): 281–294.

11. Chandrasekhrarao, C., S. Jitindranath, and T. G. K. Murthy. 2013. “Resource Optimisation in Rice Through Direct Seeding by Drum Seeder.” International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science Technology 4: 239–246.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Drummond, M. F., M. J. Sculpher, G. W. Torrance, B. J. O’Brien, and G. L. Stoddart. 2005. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

13. Duflo, E., and C. Udry 2004. Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Cote d’Ivoire: Social Norms, Separate Accounts and Consumption Choices. NBER Working Paper No. 10498. National Bureau of Economic Research.

14. Greene, W. H. 2008. Econometric Analysis, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, US: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Hurd, B. H. 2006. “Water Conservation and Residential Landscapes: Household Preferences, Household Choices.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 31(2):173–192.

16. India, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. 2013. “Situation Assessment Survey of Agricultural Households in India: NSS KI (70/33): Key Indicators of Situation of Agricultural Households in India,” 70th Round. New Delhi: National Sample Survey Office.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Kamwamba‐Mtethiwa, J., R. Namara, C. De Fraiture, J. Mangisoni, and E. Owusu. 2012. “Treadle Pump Irrigation in Malawi: Adoption, Gender and Benefits.” Irrigation and Drainage 61 (5): 583–595.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Kanchi, A. 2010. Women Workers in Agriculture: Expanding Responsibilities and Shrinking Opportunities. ILO Asia Pacific Working Paper Series. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Kishore, A., P. K. Joshi, and D. Pandey. 2015. “Drought, Distress, and a Conditional Cash Transfer Programme to Mitigate the Impact of Drought in Bihar, India.” Water International 40 (3): 417–431.

20. Kumar, V., and J. K. Ladha. 2011. “6 Direct Seeding of Rice: Recent Developments and Future Research Needs.” Advances in Agronomy 111: 297.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Lancaster, K. J. 1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74(2): 132–157.

22. Lusk, J. L., and T. C. Schroeder. 2004. “Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (2): 467–482.

23. Mahajan, G., B. S. Chauhan, and M. S. Gill. 2013. “Dry-Seeded Rice Culture in Punjab State of India: Lessons Learned from Farmers.” Field Crops Research 144: 89–99.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Mangham, L. J., K. Hanson, and B. McPake. 2009. “How to Do (or Not to Do) … Designing a Discrete Choice Experiment for Application in a Low-Income Country.” Health Policy Plan 24 (2): 151–158.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. McFadden, D., and K. Train. 2000. “Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 (5): 447–470.

26. Ortega, D. L., H. Wang, L. Wu, and N. J. Olynk. 2011. “Modeling Heterogeneity in Consumer Preferences for Select Food Safety Attributes in China.” Food Policy 36 (2): 318–324.

27. Pandey, S., and L. Velasco. 2005. “Trends in Crop Establishment Methods in Asia and Research Issues.” In Rice Is Life: Scientific Perspectives for the 21st Century, edited by K. Toriyama, K. L. Heong, and B. Hardy, 178– 181. Los Banos, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute; Tsukuba: Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. Petrin, A., and K. Train. 2003. Omitted Product Attributes in Discrete Choice Models. NBER Working Paper No. w9452. National Bureau of Economic Research.

29. Reddy, P. B. H., S. Sreenivasulu, and C. Manohar. “Good Practice Note: Direct Seeding in Rice Using DrumSeeder. ” Agricultural Extension in South Asia. Accessed July 04, 2016. www.aesagfras.net/images/bala.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Ricepedia. 2016. “Gender and Equity.” Accessed June 20, 2016. http://ricepedia.org/challenges/gender-and-equity.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Sagebiel, Julian. 2011. Comparing the latent class model with the random parameters logit. A choice experiment analysis of highly heterogeneous electricity consumers in Hyderabad, India. In II International Choice Modeling Conference, Leeds.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Selassie, G. G., and Y. Kountouris. 2010. “Fishing Permit Price and Wetland Conservation: A Choice Experiment on the Value of Improved Environmental Quality of Lake Awassa, Ethiopia.” In Choice Experiments in Developing Countries: Implementation, Challenges and Policy Implications, edited by J. Bennett and E. Birol, 50–66. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

33. Singh, S., J. K. Ladha, R. K. Gupta, L. Bhushan, and A. N. Rao. 2008. “Weed Management in Aerobic Rice Systems Under Varying Establishment Methods.” Crop Protection 27 (3): 660–671.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Villalobos, P., and C. Huenchuleo. 2010. “Ecosystem Service Valuation of Ruil (Nothofagus alessandrii) Forests in Central Chile: An Application of the Choice Experiment Method.” In Choice Experiments in Developing Countries: Implementation, Challenges and Policy Implications, edited by J. Bennett and E. Birol. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

35. Ward, P. S., A. Bell, G. Parkhurst, K. Droppelmann, and L. Mapemba. 2015. “Heterogeneous Preferences and the Effects of Incentives in Promoting Conservation Agriculture in Malawi.” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 222: 67–79.

36. Ward, P. S., and V. Singh. 2015. “Using Field Experiments to Elicit Risk and Ambiguity Preferences: Behavioural Factors and the Adoption of New Agricultural Technologies in Rural India.” Journal of Development Studies 51 (6): 707–724.

37. Ward, P. S., D. L. Ortega, D. J. Spielman, and V. Singh. 2014. “Heterogeneous Demand for Drought-Tolerant Rice: Evidence from Bihar, India.” World Development 64: 125–139.

38. Zwerina, K., J. Huber, and W. F. Kuhfeld. 1996. “A General Method for Constructing Efficient Choice Designs.” Durham, NC: Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. Accessed March 25, 2016. http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010e.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Estimating the Economic Values of Restricted Monoculture Eucalyptus Plantations: A Choice Modeling Approach. (2022). Senbeta, Feyera ; Teferi, Ermias ; Alemu, Dawit ; Tesfaw, Amare.
   In: IJERPH.
   RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9073-:d:871547.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Breaking automotive modal lock-in: a choice modelling study of Jakarta commuters. (2018). Wilson, Clevo ; Briggs, Max ; Webb, Jeremy.
   In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
   RePEc:spr:envpol:v:20:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10018-017-0181-x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Impact of justice and solidarity variables on the acceptability of managed realignment. (2017). Rey-Valette, Hélène ; Clement, Valerie ; Rulleau, Benedicte.
   In: Climate Policy.
   RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:17:y:2017:i:3:p:361-377.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Heterogeneous preferences for recreation-oriented management in commercial forests: the role of citizens’ socioeconomic characteristics and recreational profiles. (2017). Ovaskainen, Ville ; Tyrvainen, Liisa ; Juutinen, Artti ; Tolvanen, Anne ; Kosenius, Anna-Kaisa.
   In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
   RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:60:y:2017:i:3:p:399-418.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Eliciting preferences for wetland services: a way to manage conflicting land uses. (2017). Dumax, Nathalie ; Rulleau, Benedicte ; Rozan, Anne.
   In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
   RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:60:y:2017:i:2:p:309-327.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. The Warden Attitude: An Investigation of the Value of Interaction with Everyday Wildlife. (2017). Sugden, Robert ; Perino, Grischa ; Brock, Michael.
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:67:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-015-9979-9.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Economic evaluation of environmental externalities in China’s coal-fired power generation. (2017). Ma, Chunbo ; Hu, Yanan ; Zhao, Xiaoli ; Li, William ; Cai, Qiong ; Luo, Kaiyan.
   In: Energy Policy.
   RePEc:eee:enepol:v:102:y:2017:i:c:p:307-317.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Environmental Valuation With Periodical Payments in High-inflation Economies. An Argentinean Case Study. (2017). Salvador, Pablo ; Farreras, Veronica ; Riera, Pere.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:138:y:2017:i:c:p:56-63.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Using discrete choice experiments to value preferences for air quality improvement: the case of curbing haze in urban China. (2016). Zhang, Yucheng ; Tang, Chengxiang.
   In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
   RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:59:y:2016:i:8:p:1473-1494.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Economic Valuation of Sand and Gravel in Davao del Norte, Philippines. (2016). Tagalo, Romulo ; Tamayo, Adrian.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:75969.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Gender dimensions on farmers€™ preferences for direct-seeded rice with drum seeder in India. (2016). Khan, Md Tajuddin ; Joshi, Pramod Kumar ; Kishore, Avinash.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1550.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Gender Dimensions on Farmers’ Preferences for Direct-Seeded Rice with Drum Seeder in India. (2016). Khan, Md Tajuddin ; Joshi, P K ; Kishore, Avinash.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:11274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. A choice experiment on the willingness of households to accept power outages. (2016). Abrate, Graziano ; Fraquelli, Giovanni ; Erbetta, Fabrizio ; Bruno, Clementina ; Lorite-Espejo, Azahara .
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:43:y:2016:i:pb:p:151-164.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Determining visitor preferences for rhinoceros conservation management at private, ecotourism game reserves in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: A choice modeling experiment. (2016). du Preez, Mario ; Lee, Deborah E.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:130:y:2016:i:c:p:106-116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Individual preferences regarding environmental offset and welfare compensation: a choice experiment application to an offshore wind farm project. (2016). Levrel, Harold ; Dachary-Bernard, Jeanne ; Kermagoret, Charlene ; Carlier, Antoine.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:129:y:2016:i:c:p:230-240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Total Economic Valuation of the National Park Service Lands and Programs: Results of a Survey of the American Public. (2016). Loomis, John ; Haefele, Michelle ; Bilmes, Linda J.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:harjfk:16-024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Managing Some Motorised Recreational Boating Challenges in South African Estuaries: A Case Study at the Kromme River Estuary. (2015). Hosking, Stephen Gerald ; du Preez, Mario ; Lee, Deborah Ellen .
    In: South African Journal of Economics.
    RePEc:bla:sajeco:v:83:y:2015:i:2:p:286-302.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. The discrete choice experiment approach to environmental contingent valuation. (2014). Carson, Richard T. ; Czajkowski, Mikoaj.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:14820_9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Investigating fishers preferences for the design of marine Payments for Environmental Services schemes. (2014). Mourato, Susana ; Barr, Rhona F..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:108:y:2014:i:c:p:91-103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Assessing the effect of energy technology labels on preferences. (2013). Mourato, Susana ; Fimereli, Eleni .
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:2:y:2013:i:3:p:245-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Valuing the benefits of beach protection measures in the face of climate change: a French case-study. (2013). Rey-Valette, Hélène ; Rulleau, Bndicte.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:2:y:2013:i:2:p:133-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Willingness to pay for kerbside recycling in Brisbane, Australia. (2013). Bennett, Jeffrey ; Gillespie, Robert.
    In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
    RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:56:y:2013:i:3:p:362-377.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Estimating willingness to pay: do health and environmental researchers have different methodological standards?. (2013). JOHNSON, REED F..
    In: Applied Economics.
    RePEc:taf:applec:45:y:2013:i:16:p:2215-2229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Effects of alternative elicitation formats in discrete choice experiments. (2013). Bennett, Jeffrey ; Scheufele, Gabriela.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:241869.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Cost–Benefit Analysis and Distributional Preferences. (2012). Bennett, Jeff ; Scarborough, Helen.
    In: Books.
    RePEc:elg:eebook:14376.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Market segmentation and willingness to pay for green electricity among urban residents in China: The case of Jiangsu Province. (2012). Wu, Yang ; Zhang, Lei.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:51:y:2012:i:c:p:514-523.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Estimating the welfare impacts of agricultural landscape change in Ireland: a choice experiment approach. (2011). Hynes, Stephen ; Campbell, Danny.
    In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
    RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:54:y:2011:i:8:p:1019-1039.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Valuation of agricultural land-use scenarios with choice experiments: a political market share approach. (2011). Huber, Robert ; Hunziker, Marcel ; Lehmann, Bernard.
    In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
    RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:54:y:2011:i:1:p:93-113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. A comparison of compensating surplus and budget reallocation with opportunity costs specified. (2011). Hatton MacDonald, Darla ; Morrison, Mark.
    In: Applied Economics.
    RePEc:taf:applec:v:43:y:2011:i:30:p:4677-4688.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Factors influencing willingness-to-pay for the ENERGY STAR® label. (2011). Jensen, Kimberly ; Clark, Christopher ; Yen, Steven T. ; Ward, David O. ; Russell, Clifford S..
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:39:y:2011:i:3:p:1450-1458.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Choice experiment assessment of public expenditure preferences. (2010). Cullen, Ross ; Hughey, Kenneth ; Kerr, Geoffrey.
    In: New Zealand Economic Papers.
    RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:44:y:2010:i:3:p:259-268.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Researcher-Selected versus Respondent-Selected Attributes: Improved Coastal Water Quality in Tobago. (2010). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Beharry-Borg, Nesha .
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:13208_5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Developing Country Consumers’ Demand for Food Safety and Quality: Is Mumbai Ready for Certified and Organic Fruits?. (2010). Deffner, Katharina ; Birol, Ekin ; Roy, Devesh ; Karandikar, Bhushana.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:13208_15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Farmer Preferences for Bt Maize, Seed Information and Credit in the Philippines. (2010). Smale, Melinda ; Yorobe, Jose ; Birol, Ekin.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:13208_13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Introduction: The Roles and Significance of Choice Experiments in Developing Country Contexts. (2010). Bennett, Jeff ; Birol, Ekin.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:13208_1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Combining Stated and Revealed Preferences on Typical Food Products: The Case of Dry‐Cured Ham in Spain. (2010). Albisu, Luis ; Albisu-Aguado, Luis Miguel ; Resano-Ezcaray, Helena ; Sanjuan-Lopez, Ana Isabel .
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:61:y:2010:i:3:p:480-498.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Complexity in choice experiments: choice of the status quo alternative and implications for welfare measurement *. (2009). Boxall, Peter ; Adamowicz, Wiktor ; Moon, Amanda .
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:53:y:2009:i:4:p:503-519.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Public values for badgers, bovine TB reduction and management strategies. (2008). Bennett, Richard ; Willis, Ken.
    In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
    RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:51:y:2008:i:4:p:511-523.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Testing for differences in benefit transfer values between state and regional frameworks. (2008). Rolfe, John ; Windle, Jill.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:52:y:2008:i:2:p:149-168.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Using choice experiments to design wetland management programmes: The case of Severn Estuary Wetland, UK. (2007). Birol, Ekin ; Cox, Victoria.
    In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
    RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:50:y:2007:i:3:p:363-380.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. PEOPLE OR PRAIRIE CHICKENS REVISITED: STATED PREFERENCES WITH EXPLICIT NON-MARKET TRADE-OFFS. (2007). Smith, Jeff ; McKee, Michael.
    In: Defence and Peace Economics.
    RePEc:taf:defpea:v:18:y:2007:i:3:p:223-244.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Bayesian Estimation of Willingness‐to‐pay Where Respondents Mis‐report Their Preferences*. (2007). Fraser, Iain ; Bailey, Alastair ; Balcombe, Kelvin ; Chalak, A..
    In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics.
    RePEc:bla:obuest:v:69:y:2007:i:3:p:413-438.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. The Reform of Support Mechanisms for Upland Farming: Paying for Public Goods in the Severely Disadvantaged Areas of England. (2007). Hanley, Nick ; Colombo, Sergio ; Mason, Pamela ; Johns, Helen .
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:58:y:2007:i:3:p:433-453.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Decomposing the Value of Agricultural Multifunctionality: Combining Contingent Valuation and the Analytical Hierarchy Process. (2007). Kallas, Zein ; Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús ; Gomez-Limon, Jose A. ; Jesús Barreiro Hurle, .
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:58:y:2007:i:2:p:218-241.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. The Value of Badger Populations and Control of Tuberculosis in Cattle in England and Wales: A Note. (2007). Bennett, Richard ; Willis, Ken.
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:58:y:2007:i:1:p:152-156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Investigating distance effects on environmental values: a choice modelling approach *. (2007). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:51:y:2007:i:2:p:175-194.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Are citizens willing to pay for agricultural multifunctionality?. (2007). Kallas, Zein ; Arriaza, Manuel ; Gomez-Limon, Jose A..
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:36:y:2007:i:3:p:405-419.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. BUILDING CULTURAL CAPITAL: TRANSFORMING THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ARTS FESTIVAL. (2006). Willis, K. G. ; Snowball, J. D..
    In: South African Journal of Economics.
    RePEc:bla:sajeco:v:74:y:2006:i:1:p:20-33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Designing Policy for Reducing the Off‐farm Effects of Soil Erosion Using Choice Experiments. (2005). Hanley, Nick ; Colombo, Sergio ; Calatrava-Requena, Javier .
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:56:y:2005:i:1:p:81-95.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Duck Hunting and Wetland Conservation: Compromise or Synergy?. (2003). Whitten, Stuart ; Bennett, Jeffrey.
    In: Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie.
    RePEc:bla:canjag:v:51:y:2003:i:2:p:161-173.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-04 09:19:37 || Missing content? Let us know