create a website

Biotechnologies to Bridge the Schism in the Bioeconomy. (2021). Philp, Jim.
In: Energies.
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8393-:d:701148.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 83

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Bioeconomy for Resilient Post-COVID Economies. (2022). Rozakis, Stelios ; Juvani, Luka ; Kovacs, Barna.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:2958-:d:796294.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. Factsheet. Genomics in the Dairy Industry. Available online: https://ahdb.org .uk/knowledge-library/genomics-in-the-dairy-industry (accessed on 14 February 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Bio-Strategy 2020 (Basic Measures). Available online: https://www.dwih-tokyo.org/files/2020/10/bio2020_honbun_en_rev-1.p df (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Bioindustrial Innovation. Canada’s Bioeconomy Strategy: Leveraging our Strengths for a Sustainable Future. Available online: http://www.biotech.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/National_Bioeconomy_Strategy_EN-compressed.pdf (accessed on 28 February 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. Birch, K.; Levidow, L.; Papaioannou, T. Sustainable Capital? The Neoliberalization of Nature and Knowledge in the European “Knowledge-based Bio-economy”. Sustainability 2010, 2, 2898–2918. [CrossRef] Energies 2021, 14, 8393 15 of 19

  5. BIT II Bioeconomy in Italy. A New Bioeconomy Strategy for a Sustainable Italy. Available online: https://knowledge4policy.ec. europa.eu/publication/bit-ii-bioeconomy-italy-new-bioeconomy-strategy-sustainable-italy_en (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Bloch, S.E.; Ryu, M.-H.; Ozaydin, B.; Broglie, R. Harnessing atmospheric nitrogen for cereal crop production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020, 62, 181–188. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Bosch, R.; van de Pol, M.; Philp, J. Define biomass sustainability. Nature 2015, 523, 526–527. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

  8. Bracco, S.; Calicioglu, O.; Gomez San Juan, M.; Flammini, A. Assessing the Contribution of Bioeconomy to the Total Economy: A Review of National Frameworks. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1698. [CrossRef]

  9. Bugge, M.M.; Hansen, T.; Klitkou, A. What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature. Sustainability 2016, 8, 691. [CrossRef]

  10. Capper, J.L.; Cady, R.A. The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 98, skz291. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Carbonell, P.; Le Feuvre, R.; Takano, E.; Scrutton, N.S. In silico design and automated learning to boost next-generation smart biomanufacturing. Synth. Biol. 2020, 5, ysaa020. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Carlson, R. Estimating the biotech sector’s contribution to the US economy. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 247–255. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Casini, A.; Chang, F.-Y.; Eluere, R.; King, A.M.; Young, E.M.; Dudley, Q.M.; Karim, A.; Pratt, K.; Bristol, C.; Forget, A.; et al. A pressure test to make 10 molecules in 90 days: External evaluation of methods to engineer biology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 4302–4316. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory News. Full Genome Map of Oil Palm Indicates A Way to Raise Yields and Protect Rainforest. Available online: http://www.cshl.edu/News-Features/full-genome-map-of-oil-palm-indicates-a-way-to-raise-yields-and-p rotect-rainforest.html (accessed on 19 February 2021). Energies 2021, 14, 8393 17 of 19
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Cole, J.B.; Eaglen, S.A.E.; Maltecca, C.; Mulder, H.A.; Pryce, J.E. The future of phenomics in dairy cattle breeding. Anim. Front. 2020, 10, 37–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Coley, C.W.; Thomas, D.A., III; Lummiss, J.A.M.; Jaworski, J.N.; Breen, C.P.; Hart, V.T.; Fishman, J.S.; Rogers, L.; Gao, H.; Hicklin, R.W.; et al. A robotic platform for flow synthesis of organic compounds informed by AI planning. Science 2019, 365. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Conrow, J.; GMO Banana Offers Hope for Disease and Pest Resistance. Cornell Alliance for Science. Available online: https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2017/04/gmo-banana-offers-hope-for-disease-and-pest-resistance/#:~{}: text=Share,a%20newly%20published%20scientific%20paper (accessed on 19 February 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Cook, B.I.; Ault, T.R.; Smerdon, J.E. Unprecedented 21st century drought risk in the American Southwest and Central Plains. Sci. Adv. 2015, 1, e1400082. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. d’Hondt, K.; Jiménez-Sánchez, G.; Philp, J. Reconciling food and industrial needs for an Asian bioeconomy: The enabling power of genomics and biotechnology. Asian Biotechnol. Dev. Rev. 2015, 17, 85–130.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. D’Hondt, K.; Kostic, T.; McDowell, R.; Eudes, F.; Singh, B.K.; Sarkar, S.; Markakis, M.; Schelkle, B.; Maguin, E.; Sessitsch, A. Microbiome innovations for a sustainable future. Nat. Microbiol. 2021, 6, 138–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. de Haas, Y.; Windig, J.J.; Calus, M.P.L.; Dijkstra, J.; de Haan, M.; Bannink, A.; Veerkamp, R.F. Genetic parameters for predicted methane production and potential for reducing enteric emissions through genomic selection. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 6122–6134. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Doublet, A.-C.; Croiseau, P.; Fritz, S.; Michenet, A.; Hozé, C.; Danchin-Burge, C.; Laloë, D.; and Restoux, G. The impact of genomic selection on genetic diversity and genetic gain in three French dairy cattle breeds. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2019, 51, 52. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. Ellingsen, H.; Olaussen, J.O.; Utne, I.B. Environmental analysis of the Norwegian fishery and aquaculture industry—A preliminary study focusing on farmed salmon. Mar. Policy 2009, 33, 479–488. [CrossRef]

  24. European Commission. Strengthening the Connection between Economy, Society and the Environment; European Commission (EC): Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018—Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/i9540en/i9540en.pdf (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. French, K.E. Harnessing synthetic biology for sustainable development. Nat. Sustain. 2019, 2, 250–252. [CrossRef]

  27. Frisvold, G.B.; Moss, S.M.; Hodgson, A.; Maxon, M.E. Understanding the U.S. Bioeconomy: A New Definition and Landscape. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1627. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Frost, J.W.; Lievense, J. Prospects for Biocatalytic Synthesis of Aromatics in the 21st Century. New J. Chem. 1994, 18, 341–348.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Garcia-Ruiz, A.; Cole, J.B.; VanRaden, P.M.; Wiggans, G.R.; Ruiz-Lopez, F.J.; Van Tassell, C.P. Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E3995–E4004. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Gates, B. How to Avoid a Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the Breakthroughs We Need; Allen Lane: London, UK, 2021; p. 8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. George, G.; Howard-Grenville, J.; Joshi, A.; Tihanyi, L. Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Acad. Manag. J. 2016, 59, 1880–1895. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. German Federal Government. National Bioeconomy Strategy Summary. Available online: https://www.bmbf.de/files/2020_15 01_National-Bioeconomy-Strategy_Summary_accessible.pdf (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Grossi, G.; Goglio, P.; Vitali, A.; Williams, A.G. Livestock and climate change: Impact of livestock on climate and mitigation strategies. Anim. Front. 2019, 9, 69–76. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Haberl, H. Competition for land: A sociometabolic perspective. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 119, 424–431. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Hamerschlag, K.; Venkat, K.; Environmental Working Group. Meat Eaters Guide to Climate Change and Health: Life Cycle Assessments Methodology and Results. Available online: http://static.ewg.org/reports/2011/meateaters/pdf/methodology_e wg_meat_eaters_guide_to_health_and_climate_2011.pdf (accessed on 20 February 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Handler, R.M.; Shonnard, D.R.; Griffing, E.M.; Lai, A.; Palou-Rivera, I. Life Cycle Assessments of ethanol production via gas fermentation: Anticipated greenhouse gas emissions for cellulosic and waste gas feedstocks. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 3253–3261. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Hatfield, J.L.; Dold, C. Water-use efficiency: Advances and challenges in a changing climate. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 103. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Heijstra, B.D.; Leang, C.; Juminaga, A. Gas fermentation: Cellular engineering possibilities and scale up. Microb. Cell Factories 2017, 16, 60. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. High-Tech Forum. Bio IT Innovations. Convergence of Biosciences and Information Technologies. Available online: https: //www.hightech-forum.de/wp-content/uploads/htf_discussion_paper_bio_it_innovations.pdf (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. HM Government. Growing the Bioeconomy. Improving Lives and Strengthening Our Economy: A National Bioeconomy Strategy to 2030. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil e/761856/181205_BEIS_Growing_the_Bioeconomy__Web_SP_.pdf (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Karlen, D.L.; Rice, C.W. Soil Degradation: Will Humankind Ever Learn? Sustainability 2015, 7, 12490–12501. [CrossRef]

  42. Keasling, J. Building an opportunity space for synthetic biology. Int. Innov. 2015, 185, 24–25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Kitney, R.; Adeogun, M.; Fujishima, Y.; Goñi-Moreno, .; Johnson, R.; Maxon, M.; Steedman, S.; Ward, S.; Winickoff, D.; Philp, J. Enabling the advanced bioeconomy with engineering biology. Trends Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 917–920. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Lassen, J.; Difford, G.F. Review: Genetic and genomic selection as a methane mitigation strategy in dairy cattle. Animal 2020, 14, s473–s483. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Lewin, H.A.; Robinson, G.E.; Kress, W.J.; Baker, W.J.; Coddington, J.; Crandall, K.A.; Durbin, R. Earth BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 4325–4333. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Licht, S.; Cui, B.; Wang, B.; Li, F.-F.; Lau, J.; Liu, S. Ammonia synthesis by N2 and steam electrolysis in molten hydroxide suspensions of nanoscale Fe2O3. Science 2014, 345, 637–640. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Liew, F.; Martin, M.E.; Tappel, R.C.; Heijstra, B.D.; Mihalcea, C.; Köpke, M. Gas fermentation—A flexible platform for commercial scale production of low-carbon-fuels and chemicals from waste and renewable feedstocks. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 694. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. MacLeod, M.J.; Hasan, M.R.; Robb, D.H.; Mamun-Ur-Rashid, M. Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions from global aquaculture. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11679. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Marvik, O.J.; Philp, J.; The Systemic Challenge of the Bioeconomy: A Policy Framework for Transitioning towards a Sustainable Carbon Cycle Economy. EMBO Reports. Available online: https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.15252/embr.202051478 (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. McKinsey & Company. Biotech in Europe: A Strong Foundation for Growth And innovation. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/pharmaceuticals-and-medical-products/our-insights/biotech-in-europe-a-stro ng-foundation-for-growth-and-innovation# (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. McKinsey Global Institute. The Bio Revolution: Innovations Transforming Economies, Societies, and Our Lives. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/pharmaceuticals-and-medical-products/our-insights/the-bio-revolution-inn ovations-transforming-economies-societies-and-our-lives (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Ministry of Agriculture and Food in France. A Bioeconomy Strategy for France. 2018–2020 Action Plan. Available online: https://www.gouvernement.fr/sites/default/files/locale/piece-jointe/2018/10/france-bioeconomy_plan.pdf (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Safeguarding the Bioeconomy. Available online: https://www.nap. edu/catalog/25525/safeguarding-the-bioeconomy (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. OECD. Meeting Policy Challenges for a Sustainable Bioeconomy. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/publications/policy-c hallenges-facing-a-sustainable-bioeconomy-9789264292345-en.htm (accessed on 21 April 2021). Energies 2021, 14, 8393 16 of 19
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. OECD. Realising the Circular Bioeconomy; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2017. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/officiald ocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DSTI/STP/BNCT(2017)7/FINAL&docLanguage=En (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. OECD. The Bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a Policy Agenda. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/futures/long-termtechno logicalsocietalchallenges/thebioeconomyto2030designingapolicyagenda.htm (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Pelletier, N.; Tyedmers, P.; Sonesson, U.; Scholz, A.; Ziegler, F.; Flysjo, A.; Kruse, S.; Cancino, B.; Silverman, H. Not all salmon are created equal: Life cycle assessment (LCA) of global salmon farming systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 8730–8736. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Pikaar, I.; Matassa, S.; Bodirsky, B.L.; Weindl, I.; Humpenöder, F.; Rabaey, K.; Boon, N.; Bruschi, M.; Yuan, Z.; van Zanten, H.; et al. Decoupling livestock from land use through industrial feed production pathways. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 7351–7359. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Robinson, C.J.; Carbonell, P.; Jervis, A.J.; Yan, C.; Hollywood, K.A.; Dunstan, M.S.; Currin, A.; Swainston, K.J.; Spiess, N.; Taylor, R.; et al. Rapid prototyping of microbial production strains for the biomanufacture of potential materials monomers. Metab. Eng. 2020, 60, 168–182. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  60. Ronzon, T.; Piotrowski, S.; Tamosiunas, S.; Dammer, L.; Carus, M.; M’barek, R. Developments of Economic Growth and Employment in Bioeconomy Sectors across the EU. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4507. [CrossRef]

  61. Rosenblueth, M.; Ormeño-Orrillo, E.; López-López, A.; Rogel, M.A.; Reyes-Hernández, B.J.; Martínez-Romero, J.C.; Reddy, P.M.; Martínez-Romero, E. Nitrogen fixation in cereals. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1794. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Rotz, C.A. Modeling greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 6675–6690. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Schefers, J.M.; Weigel, K.A. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Integration of DNA testing into breeding programs. Anim. Front. 2012, 2, 4–9. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Schieb, P.-A.; Philp, J. Biorefinery policy needs to come of age. Trends Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 496–500. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  65. Searchinger, T.; Heimlich, R.; Houghton, R.A.; Dong, F.; Elobeid, A.; Fabiosa, J.; Tokgoz, S.; Hayes, D.; Yu, T.-H. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 2008, 319, 1238–1240. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

  66. Singh, R.; Ong-Abdullah, M.; Low, E.-T.L.; Manaf, M.A.A.; Rosli, R.; Nookiah, R. Oil palm genome sequence reveals divergence of inter-fertile species in old and new worlds. Nature 2013, 500, 335–339. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

  67. Sophocleous, M. Global and regional water availability and demand: Prospects for the future. Nat. Resour. Res. 2004, 13, 61–75. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Statista. Total Number of Biotechnology Firms in Selected European Countries in 2018. Available online: https://www.statista.c om/statistics/439960/number-of-biotechnology-companies-europe-eu/ (accessed on 28 February 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Stegmann, P.; Londo, M.; Junginger, M. The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 6, 100029. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Steinfeld, H.; Gerber, P.; Wassenaar, T.; Castel, V.; Rosales, M.; de Haan, C. Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a0701e/a0701e00.htm (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Stokstad, E. The nitrogen fix. Science 2016, 353, 1225–1227. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  72. Sverko Grdic, Z.; Krstinic Nizic, M.; Rudan, E. Circular Economy Concept in the Context of Economic Development in EU Countries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3060. [CrossRef]

  73. Tripathi, L.; Atkinson, H.; Roderick, H.; Kubiriba, J.; Tripathi, J.N. Genetically engineered bananas resistant to Xanthomonas wilt disease and nematodes. Food Energy Secur. 2017, 6, 37–47. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  74. van Dam, J.; Junginger, M. Striving to further harmonization of sustainability criteria for bioenergy in Europe: Recommendations from a stakeholder questionnaire. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 4051–4066. [CrossRef]

  75. Vivien, F.-D.; Nieddu, M.; Befort, N.; Debref, R.; Giampietro, M. The hijacking of the bioeconomy. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 159, 189–197. [CrossRef]

  76. Wang, W.; Pan, Q.; He, F.; Akhunova, A.; Chao, S.; Trick, H.; Akhunov, E. Transgenerational CRISPR-Cas9 activity facilitates multiplex gene editing in allopolyploid wheat. CRISPR J. 2018, 1, 65–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Weiss, M.; Haufe, J.; Carus, M.; Brandão, M.; Bringezu, M.S.; Hermann, B.; Patel, M.K. A review of the environmental impacts of bio-based materials. J. Ind. Ecol. 2012, 16, 169–181. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Whitehead, T.A.; Banta, S.; Bentley, W.E.; Betenbaugh, M.J.; Chan, C.; Clark, D.S.; Hoesli, C.A.; Jewett, M.C.; Junker, B.; Koffas, M.; et al. The importance and future of biochemical engineering. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2020, 117, 2305–2318. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. WO/2020/186173. Gas Fermentation for the Production of Protein-Based Bioplastics. Available online: https://patentscope.wi po.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020186173 (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Wong, K.-C. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics: Gene Regulation, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; pp. 154–196.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. World Bank. Fish to 2030: Prospects for Fisheries and Aquaculture. Agriculture and Environmental Services Discussion Paper. Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17579 (accessed on 21 April 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Yim, H.; Haselbeck, R.; Niu, W.; Pujol-Baxley, C.; Burgard, A.; Boldt, J.; Khandurina, J.; Trawick, J.D.; Osterhout, R.E.; Stephen, R.; et al. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for direct production of 1,4-butanediol. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 445–452. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Zhu, Q. Developments on CO2-utilization technologies. Clean Energy 2019, 3, 85–100. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Bioeconomy and Circular Economy Approaches Need to Enhance the Focus on Biodiversity to Achieve Sustainability. (2022). Stephenson, P J ; Damerell, Anca.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10643-:d:898470.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Unlocking Romania’s Forest-Based Bioeconomy Potential: Knowledge-Action-Gaps and the Way Forward. (2022). Stncioiu, Petru Tudor ; Drgoi, Marian ; Nichiforel, Liviu ; Dima, Daniel-Paul ; Giurca, Alexandru.
    In: Land.
    RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:2001-:d:966921.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABILITY PROMOTED BY THE CONCEPTS: CIRCULAR ECONOMY, SOCIAL ECONOMY, GREEN ECONOMY. (2021). Piciu, Gabriela.
    In: Journal of Financial and Monetary Economics.
    RePEc:vls:rojfme:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:201-206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Agroecological strategies to safeguard insect pollinators in biodiversity hotspots: Chile as a case study. (2021). , Patricia ; Vereecken, Nicolas ; Villagra, Cristian ; Schapheer, Constanza.
    In: ULB Institutional Repository.
    RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/328659.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Role of Incumbent Actors in Sustainability Transitions: A Case of LITHUANIA. (2021). Ramanauskait, Joana.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12877-:d:684363.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Contextualization of the Bioeconomy Concept through Its Links with Related Concepts and the Challenges Facing Humanity. (2021). Garbisu, Naroa ; Baraano, Leire ; Alkorta, Itziar ; Araujo, Andres.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7746-:d:592508.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Paradox of Deadwood Circular Bioeconomy in Kenya’s Public Forests. (2021). Chisika, Sylvester Ngome ; Park, Joon ; Yeom, Chunho.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7051-:d:580506.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Agroecological Strategies to Safeguard Insect Pollinators in Biodiversity Hotspots: Chile as a Case Study. (2021). Henriquez-Piskulich, Patricia A ; Vereecken, Nicolas J ; Villagra, Cristian ; Schapheer, Constanza.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6728-:d:574651.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Biotechnologies to Bridge the Schism in the Bioeconomy. (2021). Philp, Jim.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8393-:d:701148.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The Agri-Environment-Climate Measure as an Element of the Bioeconomy in Poland—A Spatial Study. (2021). Winiewski, Ukasz ; Rudnicki, Roman ; Biczkowski, Mirosaw ; Gwiadziska-Goraj, Marta ; Jezierska-Thole, Aleksandra.
    In: Agriculture.
    RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:110-:d:490795.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Privately owned forests and woodlands in Spain: Changing resilience strategies towards a forest-based bioeconomy. (2021). Sanz-Hernandez, Alexia.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:100:y:2021:i:c:s026483771931806x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Innovation governance in the forest sector: Reviewing concepts, trends and gaps. (2021). Weiss, Gerhard ; Nybakk, Erlend ; Hansen, Eric ; Toppinen, Anne ; Ludvig, Alice.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:130:y:2021:i:c:s138993412100112x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Understanding the bioeconomy: a new sustainability economy in British and European public discourse. (2021). Deutz, Pauline ; Sotiropoulou, Irene.
    In: Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal.
    RePEc:ags:aieabj:320231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields. (2020). Befort, N.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:153:y:2020:i:c:s0040162519307929.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Governance of forests and governance of forest information: Interlinkages in the age of open and digital data. (2020). Swallow, Brent ; Rantala, Salla ; Paloniemi, Riikka ; Raitanen, Elina.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:113:y:2020:i:c:s1389934118305598.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Factors behind development of innovations in European forest-based bioeconomy. (2020). Mavsar, Robert ; Lovri, Nataa.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:111:y:2020:i:c:s1389934118305239.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Mapping forest-based bioeconomy research in Europe. (2020). Mavsar, Robert ; Lovri, Nataa.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:110:y:2020:i:c:s1389934118303964.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Bioeconomy and SDGs: Does the Bioeconomy Support the Achievement of the SDGs?. (2019). Heimann, Tobias.
    In: Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:225998.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Sustainable Knowledge Management and Its Impact on the Performances of Biotechnology Organizations. (2019). Zbuchea, Alexandra ; Busu, Mihail ; Stan, Sergiu-Octavian ; Pinzaru, Florina ; Bargoanu, Alina.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:359-:d:197049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Incumbents in the Transition Towards the Bioeconomy: The Role of Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation Strategies. (2019). Strom-Andersen, Nhat.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:5044-:d:267517.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Decoupling or ‘Decaffing’? The Underlying Conceptualization of Circular Economy in the European Union Monitoring Framework. (2019). Vence-Deza, Xavier ; Llorente-Gonzalez, Leandro Javier.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4898-:d:265106.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. A Path Transition Towards a Bioeconomy—The Crucial Role of Sustainability. (2019). Hagemann, Nina ; Pannicke, Nadine ; Gawel, Erik.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:11:p:3005-:d:234896.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Frontiers of the forest-based bioeconomy – A European Delphi study. (2019). Lovri, Nataa ; Hetemaki, Lauri ; Winkel, Georg ; Hurmekoski, Elias.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:102:y:2019:i:c:p:86-99.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Exploring the Dedicated Knowledge Base of a Transformation towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy. (2018). Pyka, Andreas ; Mueller, Matthias ; Urmetzer, Sophie ; Schlaile, Michael P ; Bogner, Kristina B.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1694-:d:148475.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Drumming the Barrels of Hope? Bioeconomy Narratives in the Media. (2018). Peltomaa, Juha.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4278-:d:183869.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Inclusive Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Regeneration in a Natural Disaster Vulnerability Context: A Case Study of Chongqing, China. (2017). Wang, Yiming ; Deng, Qing ; Xiang, Pengcheng.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:7:p:1205-:d:104170.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The Route to Sustainability—Prospects and Challenges of the Bio-Based Economy. (2017). Bennich, Therese ; Belyazid, Salim.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:887-:d:99466.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates. (2017). Meyer, Rolf.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:1031-:d:101517.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices. (2017). Kalt, Gerald ; Schriefl, Ernst ; Hausknost, Daniel ; Lauk, Christian.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:669-:d:96565.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Directionality across Diversity: Governing Contending Policy Rationales in the Transition towards the Bioeconomy. (2017). Fevolden, Arne ; Bugge, Markus M ; Scordato, Lisa.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:206-:d:89300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy. (2017). Fror, Oliver ; Jorissen, Juliane ; Priefer, Carmen.
    In: Resources.
    RePEc:gam:jresou:v:6:y:2017:i:1:p:10-:d:90934.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Promotion of Social Inclusion through New Steps in Tourism. (2017). Gen, Ruhet.
    In: Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica.
    RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2017:i:3:p:194-201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. A Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Approach to Regional Innovation Systems in the Transformation to a Forestry-Based Bioeconomy. (2016). Dahlstrom, Margareta ; Grundel, Ida.
    In: Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
    RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:7:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-016-0411-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Transition Governance towards a Bioeconomy: A Comparison of Finland and The Netherlands. (2016). Bosman, Rick ; Rotmans, Jan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:10:p:1017-:d:80397.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Emergent Imaginaries and Fragmented Policy Frameworks in the Canadian Bio-Economy. (2016). Birch, Kean.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:10:p:1007-:d:80072.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. What Role for Law, Human Rights, and Bioethics in an Age of Big Data, Consortia Science, and Consortia Ethics? The Importance of Trustworthiness. (2015). Zdemir, Vural ; Dove, Edward S.
    In: Laws.
    RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:4:y:2015:i:3:p:515-540:d:54527.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Are plants the new oil? Responsible innovation, biorefining and multipurpose agriculture. (2015). Raman, Sujatha ; Shortall, O K ; Millar, Kate .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:86:y:2015:i:c:p:360-368.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Bio-basing society by including emotions. (2015). Sleenhoff, Susanne ; Osseweijer, Patricia ; Landeweerd, Laurens .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:116:y:2015:i:c:p:78-83.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. How to Analyze Bioeconomy?. (2015). MacIejczak, Mariusz.
    In: Roczniki (Annals).
    RePEc:ags:paaero:233499.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. CAN HUMAN RESOURCES INDUCE SUSTAINABILITY IN BUSINESS? MODELING, TESTING AND CORRELATING HR INDEX AND COMPANY’S BUSINESS RESULTS. (2015). Zubović, Jovan ; Jelonik, Marko ; Subi, Jonel.
    In: Economics of Agriculture.
    RePEc:ags:iepeoa:206925.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Sustainability concept: we agree to disagree. (2015). Poleanschi, Paul ; Radutu, Andrei.
    In: International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings.
    RePEc:aes:icafee:v:4:y:2015:p:394-405.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Self-Fulfilling Prophecies of the European Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy: The Discursive Shaping of Institutional and Policy Frameworks in the Bio-Pharmaceuticals Sector. (2014). Papaioannou, Theo ; Levidow, Les ; Birch, Kean.
    In: Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
    RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:1-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Guest Editorial. (2014). Ponte, Stefano ; Birch, Kean.
    In: Environment and Planning A.
    RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:2:p:271-279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Visions of Sustainability in Bioeconomy Research. (2014). Pfau, Swinda F. ; Hagens, Janneke E. ; Dankbaar, Ben ; Antoine J. M. Smits, .
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:3:p:1222-1249:d:33738.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Wasteland energy-scapes: a comparative energy flow analysis of Indias biofuel and biomass economies. (2014). Bailis, Robert ; Baka, Jennifer.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:59896.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Wasteland energy-scapes: A comparative energy flow analysis of Indias biofuel and biomass economies. (2014). Bailis, Robert ; Baka, Jennifer.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:108:y:2014:i:c:p:8-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview. (2013). Kautto, Niina ; McCormick, Kes.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:5:y:2013:i:6:p:2589-2608:d:26389.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. A Methodology for Mapping Meanings in Text-Based Sustainability Communication. (2013). Brown, Mark.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:5:y:2013:i:6:p:2457-2479:d:26223.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Challenging the bioeconomy: The dynamics of collective action in Argentina. (2013). Arancibia, Florencia.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:35:y:2013:i:2:p:79-92.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. From a Fossil-Fuel to a Biobased Economy: The Politics of Industrial Biotechnology. (2012). .
    In: Environment and Planning C.
    RePEc:sae:envirc:v:30:y:2012:i:2:p:282-296.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-22 22:13:40 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.