- Ahn, S. How Feasible is Carbon Sink in Korea? A Study on the Costs of Sequestering Carbon in Forest. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2007, 41, 89â109. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- AR-CM-001-V01. Methodology of Carbon Sink Forestation Project [EB/OL]. (2013-10) [2015-08-26]. Available online: http: //www.gsly.gov.cn/attachment/www/month-1501/20150105-105935-7874.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2019).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- BenÃtez, P.C.; Obersteiner, M. Site identification for carbon sink in Latin America: A grid-based economic approach. For. Policy Econ. 2006, 8, 636â651. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cao, X.; Li, X.; Breeze, T.D. Quantifying the carbon sink costs for Pinus elliottii afforestation project of China greenhouse gases voluntary emission reduction program: A case study in Jiangxi province. Forests 2020, 11, 928. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cao, Y.; Li, X.; Yan, H.; Kuang, S. Chinaâs efforts to peak carbon emissions: Targets and practice. Chin. J. Urban Environ. Stud. 2021, 9, 2150004. [CrossRef]
Chen, P.; Chen, B.-Y.; Tsai, P.-H.; Chen, C.-C. Evaluating the impacts of a carbon tax on imported forest productsâevidence from Taiwan. For. Policy Econ. 2015, 50, 45â52. [CrossRef]
Coleman, A. Forest-based carbon sink, and the role of forward, futures, and carbon-lending markets: A comparative institutions approach. J. For. Econ. 2018, 33, 95â104.
- Cui, C.; Liu, Y.; Hope, A.; Wang, J. Review of studies on the publicâprivate partnerships (PPP) for infrastructure projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2018, 36, 773â794. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dong, L.; Miao, G.; Wen, W. Chinaâs Carbon Neutrality Policy: Objectives, Impacts and Paths. East Asian Policy 2021, 13, 5â18. [CrossRef]
Erb, K.; Kastner, T.; Luyssaert, S.; Houghton, R.A.; Kuemmerle, T.; Olofsson, P.; Haberl, H. Bias in the attribution of forest carbon sinks. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2013, 3, 854â856. [CrossRef]
Guo, J.; Gong, P.; Sveriges, L. The potential and cost of increasing forest carbon sink in Sweden. J. For. Econ. 2017, 29, 78â86.
Haight, R.G.; Bluffstone, R.; Kline, J.D.; Kline, J.D.; Coulston, J.W.; Wear, D.N.; Zook, K. Estimating the Present Value of Carbon Sink in U.S.A. Forests, 2015â2050, for Evaluating Federal Climate Change Mitigation Policies. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 2020, 49, 150â177. [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.S.; Chen, Q. Influencing factors analysis of forestry carbon sink cost-benefit based on afforestation cost methods. Resour. Sci. 2016, 38, 485â492.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hubei Provincial Forestry Department; Hubei Provincial Forestry Investigation and Planning Institute. The Second-Class Survey Results of Forest Resources in Hubei Province; Hubei Provincial Forestry Department: Wuhan, China, 2012.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hyde, W.F. The experience of Chinaâs forest reforms: What they mean for China and what they suggest for the world. For. Policy Econ. 2019, 98, 1â7. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lin, B.; Ge, J. Valued Forest carbon sinks: How much emissions abatement costs could be reduced in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 224, 455â464. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lin, B.; Sun, C. Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 613â621. [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q. Chinese Vertical Timber Volume Table; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2017.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ndjondo, M.; Gourlet-Fleury, S.; Manlay, R.J.; Obiang, N.L.E.; Ngomanda, A.; Romero, C.; Claeys, F.; Picard, N. Opportunity costs of carbon sink in a forest concession in central Africa. Carbon Balance Manag. 2014, 9, 4â13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Plantinga, A.J.; Mauldin, T. A method for estimating the cost of CO2 mitigation through afforestation. Clim. Chang. 2001, 49, 21â40. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Richards, K.R.; Stokes, C. A Review of Forest Carbon Sink Cost Studies: A Dozen Years of Research. Clim. Chang. 2004, 63, 1â48. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- S.F.A.G. National Reserve Forest Construction Plan (2018â2035); S.F.A.G.: Beijing, China, 2018.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Slater, H.; De Boer, D.; Qian, G.; Wang, S. China Carbon Price Survey Report; ICF: Beijing, China, 2021. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7738 15 of 15
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sohngen, B.; Sedjo, R. Potential carbon flux from timber harvests and management in the context of a global timber market. Clim. Chang. 2000, 44, 151â172. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Van Kooten, G.C.; Sohngen, B. Economics of forest ecosystem carbon sinks: A review. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2007, 1, 237â269. [CrossRef]
- Xiangyang Bureau of Statistics. Xiangyang Statistical Yearbook; Xiangyang Bureau of Statistics: Xiangyang, China, 2021.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Zhang, R.; He, J.; Zhao, Y.; Peng, Y.; Fu, L. Another important factor of rising sea level: Soil Erosion. CLEANâSoil Air Water 2013, 41, 174â178. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Zhong, W.; Xing, Z. Analysis on cost and benefit of carbon sequestration in each province of China: Based on afforestation and reforestation project. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2012, 22, 33â41.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now