create a website

Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods. (2019). Sorano, Enrico ; Sardi, Alberto.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6435-:d:287553.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 6

Citations received by this document

Cites: 187

References cited by this document

Cocites: 28

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. From Participation to Involvement in Urban Open Space Management and Maintenance. (2022). Suomalainen, Sari ; Tahvonen, Outi ; Kahiluoto, Helena.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12697-:d:934530.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Ranking Environmental Aspects of Sustainable Tourism: Case of Selected European Countries. (2021). Škrinjarić, Tihana.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5701-:d:557781.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Grass-roots participation to enhance public real estate properties. Just a fad?. (2021). Micelli, Ezio ; Mangialardo, Alessia.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:103:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721000132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Cyber Risk in Health Facilities: A Systematic Literature Review. (2021). Sorano, Enrico ; Guerrieri, Anna ; Rizzi, Alessandro ; Sardi, Alberto.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2102.04093.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Cyber Risk in Health Facilities: A Systematic Literature Review. (2020). Sorano, Enrico ; Guerrieri, Anna ; Rizzi, Alessandro ; Sardi, Alberto.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7002-:d:405207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Review of Selected Performance Measurement Models Used in Public Administration. (2020). Brajer-Marczak, Renata ; Gbczyska, Alicja.
    In: Administrative Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:99-:d:454847.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abbas K.A.; Bell M.G.H. System dynamics applicability to transportation modeling. Transp. Res. Part 1994, 28, 373-390.

  2. Abdel-Hamid T.; Ankel F.; Battle-Fisher M.; Gibson B.; Gonzalez-Parra G.; Jalali M.; Kaipainen K.; Kalupahana N.; Karanfil O.; Marathe A. Public and health professionals’ misconceptions about the dynamics of body weight gain/loss. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 2014, 30, 58-74.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Adamides E.D.; Mitropoulos P.; Giannikos I.; Mitropoulos I. A multi-methodological approach to the development of a regional solid waste management system. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2009, 60, 758-770.

  4. Adams W.M.; Brockington D.; Dyson J.; Vira B. Managing Tragedies: Understanding Conflict over Common Pool Resources. Science 2003, 302, 1915-1916.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Agostino D.; Arnaboldi M. Performance Measurement Systems in Public Service Networks. The What, Who and How of Control. Financ. Account. Manag. 2018, 34, 103-116.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Alasad R.; Motawa I. Dynamic demand risk assessment for toll road projects. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2015, 33, 799-817.

  7. Alkayid K.; Hasan H.; Meloche J.A. Simulating information exchanges to investigate the utility of public health web sites. Transform. Gov. 2009, 3, 271-288.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. An Y.; Davey H.; Harun H. Sustainability reporting at a New Zealand public university: A longitudinal analysis. Sustainability 2017, 9.

  9. Ülgen V.S.; Björklund M.; Simm N.; Forslund H. Inter-Organizational Supply Chain Interaction for Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2019, 11.

  10. Aparicio S.; Urbano D.; Gómez D. The role of innovative entrepreneurship within Colombian business cycle scenarios: A system dynamics approach. Futures 2016, 81, 130-147.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Armitage D.R.; Plummer R.; Berkes F.; Arthur R.I.; Charles A.T.; Davidson-Hunt I.J.; Diduck A.P.; Doubleday N.C.; Johnson D.S.; Marschke M. Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 7, 95-102.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Arnaboldi M.; Azzone G. Critical Perspectives on Accounting Constructing performance measurement in the public sector. Crit. Perspect. Account. 2010, 21, 266-282.

  13. Arnaboldi M.; Lapsley I.; Steccolini I. Performance Management in the Public Sector: The Ultimate Challenge. Financ. Account. Manag. 2015, 31, 1-23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Artelli M.M.J.; Deckro R.F.; Zalewski C.D.J.; Leach M.S.E.; Perry M.B. A system dynamics model for selected elements of modern conflict. Mil. Oper. Res. 2009, 14, 51-74.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Auping W.L.; Pruyt E.; Kwakkel J.H. Societal Ageing in the Netherlands: A Robust System Dynamics Approach. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2015, 32, 485-501.

  16. Bérard C.; Cloutier L.M.; Cassivi L. The effects of using system dynamics-based decision support models: Testing policy-makers’ boundaries in a complex situation. J. Decis. Syst. 2017, 26, 45-63.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Baciu C.; Radu I.; Şendroiu C. Local public policy process—A new approach based on the system dynamics principles. J. Adv. Res. Law Econ. 2012, 3, 4-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Bagheri A.; Hjorth P. A framework for process indicators to monitor for sustainable development: Practice to an urban water system. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2007, 9, 143-161.

  19. Bajracharya A.; Ogunlana S.O.O.; Bach N.L.L. Effective organizational infrastructure for training activities: A case study of the Nepalese construction sector. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 2000, 16, 91-112.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Banos-Gonzalez I.; Martínez-Fernández J.; Esteve-Selma M.; Esteve-Guirao P. Sensitivity analysis in socio-ecological models as a tool in environmental policy for sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10.

  21. Barre R. Innovation systems dynamics and the positioning of Europe. A review and critique of recent Foresight studies. Foresight 2014, 16, 126-141.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Baviera-Puig A.; Gómez-Navarro T.; García-Melón M.; García-Martínez G. Assessing the communication quality of CSR reports. A case study on four spanish food companies. Sustainability 2015, 7, 11010-11031.

  23. Benvenutti L.M.M.; Ribeiro A.B.; Uriona M. Long term diffusion dynamics of alternative fuel vehicles in Brazil. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 164, 1571-1585.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Berawi M.A.; Nabila A.; Gunawan G.; Miraj P.; Rahman H.A.; Berawi A.R.B. Analysis of life cycle cost and public-private partnership in the development of Walini City as technology park. Int. J. Technol. 2018, 9, 1469-1479.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Bianchi C. Dynamic Performance Management; Springer International Publishing: Berlin, Germany, 2016; ISBN 9783319318448.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Bianchi C. Improving performance and fostering accountability in the public sector through system dynamics modelling: From an “external” to an “internal” perspective. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2010, 27, 361-384.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Bianchi C. Modelli di system dynamics per il miglioramento della performance aziendale; Ipsoa: Milano, Italy, 2009; ISBN 9788821730023.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Bianchi C.; Bivona E.; Cognata A.; Ferrara P.; Landi T.; Ricci P. Applying system dynamics to foster organizational change, accountability and performance in the public sector: A case-based Italian perspective. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2010, 27, 395-420.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Bianchi C.; Xavier J.A. The Design and Execution of Performance Management Systems at State Level: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Malaysia. Int. J. Public Adm. 2017, 40, 744-755.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Biroscak B.J.; Schneider T.; Panzera A.D.; Bryant C.A.; McDermott R.J.; Mayer A.B.; Khaliq M.; Lindenberger J.; Courtney A.H.; Swanson M.A. Applying systems science to evaluate a community—Based social marketing innovation: A case study. Soc. Mar. Q. 2014, 20, 247-267.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Bititci U.; Garengo P.; Dörfler V.; Nudurupati S. Performance Measurement: Challenges for Tomorrow. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2012, 14, 305-327.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Bititci U.S.; Carrie A.S.; Mcdevitt L. Integrated performance measurement systems: A development guide. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 1997, 17, 522-534.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Bolton R.; Hannon M. Governing sustainability transitions through business model innovation: Towards a systems understanding. Res. Policy 2016, 45, 1731-1742.

  34. Brignall S.; Modell S. An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the “new public sector”. Manag. Account. Res. 2000, 11, 281-306.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Brown G.S. Improving education in public schools: Innovative teachers to the rescue. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 1992, 8, 83-89.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Bunn D.; Dyner I. Systems simulation to support integrated energy analysis and liberalised planning. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 1996, 3, 105-115.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Cagliano A.C.; Carlin A.; Mangano G.; Rafele C. Analyzing the diffusion of eco-friendly vans for urban freight distribution. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2017, 28, 1218-1242.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Calvo N.; Varela-Candamio L.; Novo-Corti I. A dynamic model for construction and demolition (C&D) waste management in Spain: Driving policies based on economic incentives and tax penalties. Sustainability 2014, 6, 416-435.

  39. Cantele S.; Tsalis T.A.; Nikolaou I.E. A new framework for assessing the sustainability reporting disclosure of water utilities. Sustainability 2018, 10.

  40. Cantino V.; Devalle A.; Cortese D.; Ricciardi F.; Longo M. Place-based network organizations and embedded entrepreneurial learning: Emerging paths to sustainability. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2017, 23, 504-523.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Carini C.; Rocca L.; Veneziani M.; Teodori C. Ex-ante impact assessment of sustainability information-the directive 2014/95. Sustainability 2018, 10.

  42. Carmona S.; Grönlund A. Measures vs actions: The balanced scorecard in Swedish Law Enforcement. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2003, 23, 1475-1496.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Carrete L.; Arroyo P.; Villaseñor R. A socioecological view toward an understanding of how to prevent overweight in children. J. Consum. Mark. 2017, 34, 156-168.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Carter D.; Moizer J.D. Simulating the impact of policy on patrol policing: Introducing the emergency service incident model. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 2011, 27, 331-357.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Casey T.R.; Töyli J. Dynamics of two-sided platform success and failure: An analysis of public wireless local area access. Technovation 2012, 32, 703-716.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Cavana R.Y.; Clifford L. V Demonstrating the utility of system dynamics for public policy analysis in New Zealand: The case of excise tax policy on tobacco. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 2006, 22, 321-348.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Cernohorsky P.; Voracek J. Value of information in health services market. Meas. Bus. Excel. 2012, 16, 42-53.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Ceulemans K.; Lozano R.; Alonso-Almeida M.M. Sustainability reporting in higher education: Interconnecting the reporting process and organisational change management for sustainability. Sustainability 2015, 7, 8881-8903.

  49. Chen J.-H.; Chen Y. The evolution of public industry R&D institute—The case of ITRI. R D Manag. 2016, 46, 49-61.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Christensen T.; Lægreid P. The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Adm. Rev. 2007, 67, 1059-1066.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Coyle R.G. Simulation by repeated optimisation. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1999, 50, 429-438.

  52. Crespi F. Policy complexity and the green transformation of the economies as an emergent system property. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 2016, 18, 143-157.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Cui Q.; Kuang H.-B.; Wu C.-Y.; Li Y. Dynamic formation mechanism of airport competitiveness: The case of China. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2013, 47, 10-18.

  54. Dangerfield B.C. System dynamics applications to european health care issues. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1999, 50, 345-353.

  55. Dasgupta D.; Debsarkar A.; Hazra T.; Bala B.K.; Gangopadhyay A.; Chatterjee D. Scenario of future e-waste generation and recycle-reuse-landfill-based disposal pattern in India: A system dynamics approach. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2017, 19, 1473-1487.

  56. David Wheat I. What can system dynamics learn from the public policy implementation literature?. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2010, 27, 425-442.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. De Marco A.; Giannantonio R.; Zenezini G. The diffusion mechanisms of dynamic ridesharing services. Prog. Ind. Ecol. 2015, 9, 408-432.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Dietz T.; Ostrom E.; Stern P.C. The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science 2003, 302, 1907-1912.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Ding Z.; Zhu M.; Tam V.W.Y.; Yi G.; Tran C.N.N. A system dynamics-based environmental benefit assessment model of construction waste reduction management at the design and construction stages. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 176, 676-692.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Dutta A.; Roy R. Offshore outsourcing: A dynamic causal model of counteracting forces. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2005, 22, 15-35.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Egilmez G.; Tatari O. A dynamic modeling approach to highway sustainability: Strategies to reduce overall impact. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2012, 46, 1086-1096.

  62. Ercan T.; Onat N.C.; Tatari O. Investigating carbon footprint reduction potential of public transportation in United States: A system dynamics approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 133, 1260-1276.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Ercan T.; Onat N.C.C.; Tatari O.; Mathias J.-D. Public transportation adoption requires a paradigm shift in urban development structure. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 1789-1799.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Evenden D.; Harper P.R.; Brailsford S.C.; Harindra V. Improving the cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia screening with targeted screening strategies. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2006, 57, 1400-1412.

  65. Evenden D.; Harper P.R.; Brailsford S.C.; Harindra V. System Dynamics modeling of Chlamydia infection for screening intervention planning and cost-benefit estimation. Ima J. Manag. Math. 2005, 16, 265-279.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Ferraro F.; Etzion D.; Gehman J. Tackling Grand Challenges Pragmatically: Robust Action Revisited. Organ. Stud. 2015, 36, 363-390.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Fiddaman T. Dynamics of climate policy. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 2007, 23, 21-34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Forrester J.W. System dynamics as an organizing framework for pre-coiiege education. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 1993, 9, 183-194.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Forrester J.W.; Mass N.J.; Ryan C.J. The system dynamics national model: Understanding socio-economic behavior and policy alternatives. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1976, 9, 51-68.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Franco-Santos M.; Lucianetti L.; Bourne M. Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Manag. Account. Res. 2012, 23, 79-119.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Fuentes-Bracamontes R. How to reform the power sector in Mexico? Insights from a simulation model. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 2012, 6, 438-464.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. García J.A.M.; Caro L.M. Understanding customer loyalty through system dynamics: The case of a public sports service in Spain. Manag. Decis. 2009, 47, 151-172.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Genge B.; Kiss I.; Haller P. A system dynamics approach for assessing the impact of cyber attacks on critical infrastructures. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 2015, 10, 3-17.

  74. Georgantzas N.C.; Katsamakas E.; Solowiej D. Exploring dynamics of Giddens’ globalization. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2010, 27, 622-638.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Ghaffarzadegan N.; Lyneis J.; Richardson G.P. How small system dynamics models can help the public policy process. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 2011, 27, 22-44.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Ghaffarzadegan N.; Xue Y.; Larson R.C. Work-education mismatch: An endogenous theory of professionalization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2017, 261, 1085-1097.

  77. Gold S.; Muthuri J.N.; Reiner G. Collective action for tackling “wicked” social problems: A system dynamics model for corporate community involvement. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 179, 662-673.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. González-Busto B.; García R. Waiting lists in Spanish public hospitals: A system dynamics approach. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 1999, 15, 201-224.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Greatbanks R.; Tapp D. The impact of balanced scorecards in a public sector environment: Empirical evidence from Dunedin City Council, New Zealand. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2007, 27, 846-873.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Hamilton C. Emerging research institutions’ technology transfer supply chain networks’ sustainability: Budget resource planning tool development. IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev. 2017, 45, 49-52.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Hammerschmid G.; van de Walle S.; Stimac V. Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: Results from an international survey. Public Money Manag. 2013, 33, 261-268.

  82. Henderson H. Social innovation and citizen movements. Futures 1993, 25, 322-338.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Hess C. Mapping the New Commons. Proceedings of the Governing Shared Resources: Conneting Local Experience to Global Challenges, the 12th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, Cheltenham, UK, 14–18 July 2008, ; pp. 1-76.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Hilmola O.-P.; Henttu V. Transportation costs do matter: Simulation study from hospital investment decision. J. Model. Manag. 2016, 11, 560-584.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Howick S.; Eden C. Supporting strategic conversations: The significance of a quantitative model building process. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2011, 62, 868-878.

  86. Hwang S.; Park M.; Lee H.-S.; Lee S.; Kim H. Dynamic feasibility analysis of the housing supply strategies in a recession: Korean housing market. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2013, 139, 148-160.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Hwang S.; Park M.; Lee H.-S.; Lee S.; Kim H. Postdisaster interdependent built environment recovery efforts and the effects of governmental plans: Case analysis using system dynamics. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2015, 141, 04014081.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Jan C.-G. Policies for developing defense technology in newly industrialised countries: A case study of Taiwan. Technol. Soc. 2003, 25, 351-368.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Jankuj M.; Voracek J. Dynamic modelling of national healthcare system. Meas. Bus. Excel. 2015, 19, 76-89.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Jia S.; Yan G.; Shen A. Traffic and emissions impact of the combination scenarios of air pollution charging fee and subsidy. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 678-689.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Jo H.; Lee H.; Suh Y.; Kim J.; Park Y. A dynamic feasibility analysis of public investment projects: An integrated approach using system dynamics and agent-based modeling. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2015, 33, 1863-1876.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Kapp J.M.; Simoes E.J.; DeBiasi A.; Kravet S.J. A Conceptual Framework for a Systems Thinking Approach to US Population Health. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2017, 34, 686-698.

  93. Kim D.; Kim S. Sustainable supply chain based on news articles and sustainability reports: Text mining with Leximancer and DICTION. Sustainability 2017, 9.

  94. Kroll A.; Moynihan D.P. The Design and Practice of Integrating Evidence: Connecting Performance Management with Program Evaluation. Public Adm. Rev. 2018, 78, 183-194.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Kumar D.; Kumar D. Managing the essential medicines stock at rural healthcare systems in India. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 2018, 31, 950-965.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  96. Labedz C.S.; Cavaleri S.A.; Berry G.R. Interactive knowledge management: Putting pragmatic policy planning in place. J. Knowl. Manag. 2011, 15, 551-567.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  97. Lane D.C.; Monefeldt C.; Rosenhead J.V. Looking in the wrong place for healthcare improvements: A system dynamics study of an accident and emergency department. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2000, 51, 518-531.

  98. Lane D.C.; Munro E.; Husemann E. Blending systems thinking approaches for organisational analysis: Reviewing child protection in England. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2016, 251, 613-623.

  99. Larsen E.R.; Bunn D. Deregulation in electricity: Understanding strategic and regulatory risk. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1999, 50, 337-344.

  100. Lebcir R.M.; Atun R.A.; Coker R.J. System dynamic simulation of treatment policies to address colliding epidemics of tuberculosis, drug resistant tuberculosis and injecting drug users driven HIV in Russia. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2010, 61, 1238-1248.

  101. Liu C.; Mak V.; Rapoport A. Cost-sharing in directed networks: Experimental study of equilibrium choice and system dynamics. J. Oper. Manag. 2015, 39–40, 31-47.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  102. Liu M.-F.; Liu Y.-F. Research on constructing urban green traffic system: The case of Shenzhen City. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Inform. 2016, 8, 150-164.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  103. Liu P.; Mu D. Evaluating sustainability of truck weight regulations: A system dynamics view. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2015, 8, 1711-1730.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  104. Liu X.; Mao G.; Ren J.; Li R.Y.M.; Guo J.; Zhang L. How might China achieve its 2020 emissions target? A scenario analysis of energy consumption and CO2 emissions using the system dynamics model. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 103, 401-410.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  105. Maran L.; Bracci E.; Inglis R. Performance management systems’ stability: Unfolding the human factor–A case from the Italian public sector. Br. Account. Rev. 2018, 50, 324-339.

  106. Martin E.G.; Macdonald R.H.; Smith L.C.; Gordon D.E.; Tesoriero J.M.; Laufer F.N.; Leung S.-Y.J.; O’Connell D.A. Policy modeling to support administrative decisionmaking on the new york state hiv testing law. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 2015, 34, 403-423.

  107. Marzouk M.; Azab S. Environmental and economic impact assessment of construction and demolition waste disposal using system dynamics. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 82, 41-49.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  108. Mas-Tur A.; Roig-Tierno N.; Ribeiro-Navarrete B. Successful entrepreneurial learning: Success factors of adaptive governance of the commons. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  109. Mashayekhi A.N. Project cost dynamics for development policy-making. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2000, 51, 301-310.

  110. Mashayekhi A.N. Public finance, oil revenue expenditure and economic performance: A comparative study of four countries. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 1998, 14, 189-219.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  111. McDavid J.C.; Huse I. Legislator uses of public performance reports: Findings from a five-year study. Am. J. Eval. 2012, 33, 7-25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  112. Meadows D.H. System dynamics meets the press. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 1989, 5, 69-80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  113. Mei Z.; Lou Q.; Zhang W.; Zhang L.; Shi F. Modelling the Effects of Parking Charge and Supply Policy Using System Dynamics Method. J. Adv. Transp. 2017, 2017, 10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  114. Meker T.; Barlas Y. Dynamic Consequences of Performance-Based Payment Systems in Public Hospitals. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2015, 32, 459-480.

  115. Mench R.G.; Bagodi V.; Raikar V.A. A system dynamics’ based study of Indian public sector units. Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 2012, 6, 135-148.

  116. Mikulskiene B.; Pitrenaite-Zileniene B. From stakeholders’ competition to the balance of interests: System dynamics model of participatory policy. Int. J. Technol. Policy Manag. 2013, 13, 294-312.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  117. Moallemi E.A.; Aye L.; de Haan F.J.; Webb J.M. A dual narrative-modelling approach for evaluating socio-technical transitions in electricity sectors. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 1210-1224.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  118. Modell S. Performance management in the public sector: Past experiences, current practices and future challenges. Aust. Account. Rev. 2005, 15, 56-66.

  119. Neely A.; Gregory M.; Platts K.; Neely A.; Gregory M.; Platts K. A literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 1995, 15, 80-116.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  120. Newig J.; Haberl H.; Pahl-Wostl C.; Rothman D.S. Formalised and non-formalised methods in resource management-knowledge and social learning in participatory processes: An introduction. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 2008, 21, 381-387.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  121. Nielsen P.A.; Jacobsen C.B. Zone of Acceptance under Performance Measurement: Does Performance Information Affect Employee Acceptance of Management Authority?. Public Adm. Rev. 2018, 78, 684-693.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  122. Oliva R. Model calibration as a testing strategy for system dynamics models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2003, 151, 552-568.

  123. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  124. Otto P.; Nevo D. Electronic health records: A simulation model to measure the adoption rate from policy interventions. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2013, 26, 165-182.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  125. Páez-Pérez D.; Sánchez-Silva M. A dynamic principal-agent framework for modeling the performance of infrastructure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2016, 254, 576-594.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  126. Pastor Ansah J.; Azeem Qureshi M. System dynamics model of debt accumulation in developing countries: The case of Ghana and Pakistan. Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Stud. 2013, 4, 317-337.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  127. Pedamallu C.S.; Ozdamar L.; Akar H.; Weber G.W.; Özsoy A. Investigating academic performance of migrant students: A system dynamics perspective with an application to Turkey. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 139, 422-430.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  128. Pedercini M.; Azeem Qureshi M. A resource-based approach to the modeling and simulation of income distribution: The case of Pakistan. J. Income Distrib. 2010, 19, 65-87.

  129. Pejic-Bach M.; Ceric V. Developing System Dynamics with Step-by-Step approach. J. Inf. Organ. Sci. 2007, 31, 171-185.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  130. Peng H.-L.; Hsiao C.-T.; Yao M.-H. Systemic Analysis of Pensions: The Case of the Taiwanese Primary School Teacher Pension Fund. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2016, 33, 159-172.

  131. Pinho J.C. TQM and performance in small medium enterprises: The mediating effect of customer orientation and innovation. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2008, 25, 256-275.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  132. Poister T.H. The future of strategic planning in the public sector: Linking strategic management and performance. Public Adm. Rev. 2010, 70, 246-254.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  133. Qian Y.; Zhong Y.; Yuan J. Investigating traffic congestion in Shanghai: A system dynamics approach. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Inform. 2006, 1, 363-379.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  134. Qureshi M.A. Challenging trickle-down approach: Modelling and simulation of public expenditure and human development—The case of Pakistan. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 2008, 35, 269-282.

  135. Qureshi M.A. Human development, public expenditure and economic growth: A system dynamics approach. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 2009, 36, 93-104.

  136. Ricciardi F.; Cantino V.; Rossignoli C. Organizational learning for the common good: An emerging model. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  137. Ricciardi F.; Zardini A.; Rossignoli C. Business network commons and their fragilities: Emerging configurations of local organizational fields. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 89, 328-335.

  138. Ricciardi F.; Zardini A.; Rossignoli C. Organizational dynamism and adaptive business model innovation: The triple paradox configuration. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 5487-5549.

  139. Roberts C.; Dangerfield B. Modelling the epidemiological consequences of hiv infection and aids: A contribution from operational research. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1990, 41, 273-289.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  140. Roberts N.; Li V.; Atkinson J.-A.; Heffernan M.; McDonnell G.; Prodan A.; Freebairn L.; Lloyd B.; Nieuwenhuizen S.; Mitchell J. Can the Target Set for Reducing Childhood Overweight and Obesity Be Met? A System Dynamics Modelling Study in New South Wales, Australia. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2019, 36, 36-52.

  141. Rose C.M.; Roset C. The Comedy of the Commons: Commerce, Custom, and Inherently Public Property. Univ. Chic. Law Rev. 1986, 53, 711-781.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  142. Rossignoli C.; Ricciardi F.; Bonomi S. Organizing for commons-enabling decision-making under conflicting institutional logics in social entrepreneurship. Group Decis. Negot. 2018, 27, 417-443.

  143. Rouwette E.; Bleijenbergh I.; Vennix J. Group Model-Building to Support Public Policy: Addressing a Conflicted Situation in a Problem Neighbourhood. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2016, 33, 64-78.

  144. Saeed K. A re-evaluation of the effort to alleviate poverty and hunger. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 1987, 21, 291-304.

  145. Saeed K. Public policy and rural poverty. A system dynamics analysis of a social change effort in Pakistan. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1982, 21, 325-349.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  146. Salhieh L.; Singh N. A system dynamics framework for benchmarking policy analysis for a university system. Benchmarking 2003, 10, 490-498.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  147. Sapiri H.; Kamil A.A.; Tahar R.M. System dynamics approach as a risk management tool in analyzing pension expenditure: The case of malaysian employees public pension plan. Singap. Econ. Rev. 2014, 59, 1450046.

  148. Sardi A.; Garengo P.; Bititci U. Measurement and management of competences by enterprise social networking. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 2019, 68, 109-126.

  149. Schuh H.B.B.; Merritt M.W.W.; Igusa T.; Lee B.Y.Y.; Peters D.H.H. Examining the structure and behavior of Afghanistan’s routine childhood immunization system using system dynamics modeling. Int. J. Health Gov. 2017, 22, 212-227.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  150. Scott R.J.; Cavana R.Y.; Cameron D. Client Perceptions of Reported Outcomes of Group Model Building in the New Zealand Public Sector. Group Decis. Negot. 2016, 25, 77-101.

  151. Setyohadi P.; Artana K.B.; Manfaat D.; Gurning R.O.S. Dynamic response of risk management model to mitigate impact of maritime regulatory changes: Oil tanker owners perspective. Oper. Supply Chain Manag. 2018, 11, 118-127.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  152. Sgouridis S.; Bonnefoy P.A.; Hansman R.J. Air transportation in a carbon constrained world: Long-term dynamics of policies and strategies for mitigating the carbon footprint of commercial aviation. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2011, 45, 1077-1091.

  153. Siegl W.; Lassnig A.; Schröttner J. Hip replacement in Austria-modelling the economic burden due to obesity. Acad. Strateg. Manag. J. 2015, 14, 91-98.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  154. Sobotková L. Limits of usage of cost-benefit analysis by evaluation of public projects. J. Sci. Pap. Univ. Pardubic. 2014, 21, 34-46.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  155. Song J.; Song D.; Zhang D. Modeling the Concession Period and Subsidy for BOT Waste-to-Energy Incineration Projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2015, 141, 04015033.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  156. Speklé R.F.; Verbeeten F.H.M. The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Manag. Account. Res. 2014, 25, 131-146.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  157. Stave K.A. Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 2002, 18, 139-167.

  158. Stave K.A.; Beck A.; Galvan C. Improving Learners’ Understanding of Environmental Accumulations through Simulation. Simul. Gaming 2015, 46, 270-292.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  159. Sterman J. Business Dynamics. Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World; Irwin/McGraw Hill: Boston, MA, USA, 2000.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  160. Sterman J.; Franck T.; Fiddaman T.; Jones A.; McCauley S.; Rice P.; Sawin E.; Siegel L.; Rooney-Varga J.N. WORLD CLIMATE: A Role-Play Simulation of Climate Negotiations. Simul. Gaming 2015, 46, 348-382.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  161. Sudhir V.; Srinivasan G.; Muraleedharan V.R. Planning for sustainable solid waste management in urban India. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 1997, 13, 223-246.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  162. Sukitsch M.; Engert S.; Baumgartner R.J. The implementation of corporate sustainability in the European automotive industry: An analysis of sustainability reports. Sustainability 2015, 7, 11504-11531.

  163. Taylor K.; Dangerfield B. Modelling the feedback effects of reconfiguring health services. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2005, 56, 659-675.

  164. Taylor T.R.B.; Ford D.N.; Yvon-Lewis S.A.; Lindquist E. Science, engineering, and technology in the policy process for mitigating natural-societal risk. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 2011, 27, 173-194.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  165. Tebbens R.J.D.; Thompson K.M. Priority shifting and the dynamics of managing eradicable infectious diseases. Manag. Sci. 2009, 55, 650-663.

  166. Townshend J.R.P.; Turner H.S. Analysing the effectiveness of Chlamydia screening. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2000, 51, 812-824.

  167. Trencher G.; Nagao M.; Chen C.; Ichiki K.; Sadayoshi T.; Kinai M.; Kamitani M.; Nakamura S.; Yamauchi A.; Yarime M. Implementing sustainability co-creation between universities and society: A typology-based understanding. Sustainability 2017, 9.

  168. Vaglio A. Economic growth, Koestler cycles and the lock chamber effect. Int. Rev. Econ. 2010, 57, 369-393.

  169. Viégas F.B.; Wattenberg M.; McKeon M.M. The Hidden Order of Wikipedia. Online Communities and Social Computing; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 445-454.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  170. Videira N.; Antunes P.; Santos R.; Lopes R. A participatory modelling approach to support integrated sustainability assessment processes. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2010, 27, 446-460.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  171. Wakeland W.; Nielsen A.; Schmidt T.D. Gaining Policy Insight with a System Dynamics Model of Pain Medicine Prescribing, Diversion and Abuse. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2016, 33, 400-412.

  172. Willis G.; Cave S.; Kunc M. Strategic workforce planning in healthcare: A multi-methodology approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2018, 267, 250-263.

  173. Winkler T.J.; Ziekow H.; Weinberg M. Municipal benefits of participatory Urban sensing: A simulation approach and case validation. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2012, 7, 101-120.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  174. Wolstenholme E.F. A case study in community care using systems thinking. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1993, 44, 925-934.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  175. Xiao B.; Niu D.; Guo X. Can natural gas-fired power generation break through the dilemma in China? A system dynamics analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 137, 1191-1204.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  176. Xie X.; Liu Y.; Hou J. An analysis on behaviors of real estate developers and government in sustainable building decision making. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2014, 7, 491-505.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  177. Xiong W.; Yuan J.-F.; Li Q.; Skibniewski M.J. Performance objective-based dynamic adjustment model to balance the stakeholders satisfaction in PPP projects. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2015, 21, 539-547.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  178. Xu Y.; Sun C.; Skibniewski M.J.; Chan A.P.C.; Yeung J.F.Y.; Cheng H. System Dynamics (SD) based concession pricing model for PPP highway projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2012, 30, 240-251.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  179. Yuan H.P.; Shen L.Y.; Hao J.J.L.; Lu W.S. A model for cost-benefit analysis of construction and demolition waste management throughout the waste chain. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 604-612.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  180. Yuan J.; Zeng A.Y.; Skibniewski M.J.; Li Q. Selection of performance objectives and key performance indicators in public-private partnership projects to achieve value for money. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2009, 27, 253-270.

  181. Zhang H.; Jin R.; Li H.; Skibniewski M.J.J. Pavement Maintenance-Focused Decision Analysis on Concession Periods of PPP Highway Projects. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 04017047.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  182. Zhang L.; Zhao Z.; Xin H.; Chai J.; Wang G. Charge pricing model for electric vehicle charging infrastructure public-private partnership projects in China: A system dynamics analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 199, 321-333.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  183. Zhao R.; Zhong S. Carbon labelling influences on consumers’ behaviour: A system dynamics approach. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 51, 98-106.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  184. Zhao R.; Zhou X.; Jin Q.; Wang Y.; Liu C. Enterprises’ compliance with government carbon reduction labelling policy using a system dynamics approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 163, 303-319.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  185. Zhao W.; Ren H.; Rotter V.S.S. A system dynamics model for evaluating the alternative of type in construction and demolition waste recycling center—The case of Chongqing, China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 933-944.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  186. Zhuo Z.Y.; Zhao X.G.; Zhi R.L.; Zuo Y. The development of the renewable energy power industry under feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard: A case study of China’s wind power industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 168, 1262-1276.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  187. Zuo Y.; Zhao X.G.; Zhang Y.Z.; Zhou Y. From feed-in tariff to renewable portfolio standards: An evolutionary game theory perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 213, 1274-1289.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. To compete or cooperate: The application of system dynamics simulation on the choice of Chinese banks. (2025). Hua, Qiulan ; Yin, Wei ; Kirkulak-Uludag, Berna.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance.
    RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:45:y:2025:i:c:s2214635025000036.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Subsidy policies towards zero-emission bus fleets: A systematic technical-economic analysis. (2024). Wang, Zhuowei ; Fu, Xiaowen ; Yu, Jiangbo ; Chen, Anthony.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:150:y:2024:i:c:p:1-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Autonomous vehicle market development in Beijing: A system dynamics approach. (2024). Mao, Wei ; Shepherd, Simon ; Xu, Meng ; Harrison, Gillian.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:179:y:2024:i:c:s0965856423003099.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. A system dynamics analysis of the trans-Pacific trade lane during the pandemic. (2023). Wang, ZE ; Zhu, Shengda ; Cheung, Kam-Fung.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:176:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423002227.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. A system dynamics model for effective management strategies of High-Speed Railway (HSR) projects involving private sector participation. (2023). Maemura, YU ; Dasari, Rohit ; Bugalia, Nikhil ; Patidar, Manoj.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:175:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423001994.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The impact of passenger electric vehicles on carbon reduction and environmental impact under the 2050 net zero policy in Taiwan. (2023). Shen, Yung-Shuen ; Huang, Lance Hongwei ; Chang-Chien, Chien-Li ; Kuo, Chien-Hung.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:183:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523004238.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Freight Transport Decarbonization: A Systematic Literature Review of System Dynamics Models. (2022). Ghisolfi, Veronica ; Tavasszy, Lorant Antal ; de Almeida, Gonalo Homem ; Ribeiro, Glaydston Mattos ; de Lorena, Gisele.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3625-:d:775024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. A System Dynamics Model of Multi-Airport Logistics System under the Impact of COVID-19: A Case of Jing-Jin-Ji Multi-Airport System in China. (2022). Wu, Hao ; Zhao, Bing.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12823-:d:936128.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Safety evaluation of urban rail transit operation considering uncertainty and risk preference: A case study in China. (2022). Hu, Xinlei ; Zhou, Wenliang ; Chai, Naijie.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:125:y:2022:i:c:p:267-288.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Systemic approach for integration of sustainability in evaluation of public policies for adoption of electric vehicles. (2021). Cardenas, Laura M ; Lopez-Arboleda, Esteban ; Sarmiento, Alfonso T.
    In: Systemic Practice and Action Research.
    RePEc:spr:syspar:v:34:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-020-09540-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Decision-making instruments for container seaport sustainable development: management platform and system dynamics model. (2021). Mamatok, Yuliya ; Huang, Yingyi ; Jin, Chun.
    In: Environment Systems and Decisions.
    RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:41:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-020-09796-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN EMERGING ECONOMIES: A CASE STUDY FOR THE CONDITIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN. (2021). Raimbekov, Zhanarys ; Syzdykbayeva, Bakyt.
    In: Transport Problems.
    RePEc:exl:1trans:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:199-211.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods. (2021). Sorano, E ; Sardi, A.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2102.04090.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Complex systems modeling for evaluating potential impact of traffic safety policies: a case on drug-involved fatal crashes. (2020). Araz, Ozgur M ; Stimpson, Jim P ; Wilson, Fernando A.
    In: Annals of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:annopr:v:291:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-018-2961-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Toward the Dynamic Modeling of Transition Problems: The Case of Electric Mobility. (2020). Raven, Rob ; Zolfagharian, Mohammadreza ; Walrave, Bob ; Georges, A.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:38-:d:466670.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Fairness in Transport Policy: A New Approach to Applying Distributive Justice Theories. (2020). Chapman, Ralph ; Howden-Chapman, Philippa ; Keall, Michael ; Hosking, Jamie ; Randal, Edward ; Shaw, Caroline ; Waa, Andrew M ; Woodward, Alistair ; MacMillan, Alex.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10102-:d:455684.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Systematic Review of Integrated Sustainable Transportation Models for Electric Passenger Vehicle Diffusion. (2019). Cardenas, Laura M ; Lopez-Arboleda, Esteban ; Sarmiento, Alfonso T.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2513-:d:227190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods. (2019). Sorano, Enrico ; Sardi, Alberto.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6435-:d:287553.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Brazilian urban mobility policy: The impact in São Paulo transport system using system dynamics. (2019). Fontoura, Wlisses Bonela ; Ribeiro, Glaydston Mattos ; de Lorena, Gisele.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:73:y:2019:i:c:p:51-61.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A system dynamic approach for the smart mobility of people: Implications in the age of big data. (2019). Maruccia, Ylenia ; del Vecchio, Pasquale ; Secundo, Giustina ; Passiante, Giuseppina.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:149:y:2019:i:c:s0040162519306419.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Simulating vehicle fleet composition: A review of system dynamics models. (2019). Jochem, Patrick ; Gomez, Jonatan J.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:115:y:2019:i:c:s1364032119305751.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Causal inference in travel demand modeling (and the lack thereof). (2018). Brathwaite, Timothy ; Walker, Joan L.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:26:y:2018:i:c:p:1-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Exploring stability and change in transport systems: combining Delphi and system dynamics approaches. (2017). Stephenson, Janet ; Hopkins, Debbie ; Rees, David ; Doering, Adam .
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:44:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s11116-016-9677-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Establishment of the Sustainable Ecosystem for the Regional Shipping Industry Based on System Dynamics. (2017). Wen, Yuanqiao ; Geng, Xiaoqiao ; Zhou, Chunhui ; Xiao, Changshi.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:5:p:742-:d:97541.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Eliminating Overload Trucking via a Modal Shift to Achieve Intercity Freight Sustainability: A System Dynamics Approach. (2017). Liu, Pei ; Mu, Dong ; Gong, Daqing.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:398-:d:92447.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. A multi-paradigm approach to system dynamics modeling of intercity transportation. (2014). Lewe, J.-H., ; Hivin, L. F. ; Mavris, D. N..
    In: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.
    RePEc:eee:transe:v:71:y:2014:i:c:p:188-202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Air transportation in a carbon constrained world: Long-term dynamics of policies and strategies for mitigating the carbon footprint of commercial aviation. (2011). Sgouridis, Sgouris ; Bonnefoy, Philippe A. ; Hansman, John R..
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:45:y:2011:i:10:p:1077-1091.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Optimal control of road freight flows by route choice inducement: A case from Mexico. (2006). Moreno-Quintero, Eric.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:175:y:2006:i:3:p:1588-1604.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 20:41:11 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.