create a website

Resources, Collaborators, and Neighbors: The Three-Pronged Challenge in the Implementation of Bioeconomy Regions. (2019). Okeeffe, Sinead ; Thran, Daniela ; Ingrao, Carlo ; Bezama, Alberto.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7235-:d:298759.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 102

References cited by this document

Cocites: 30

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Biotechnology and Bio-Based Products Perceptions in the Community of Madrid: A Representative Survey Dataset. (2023). del Carmen, Maria ; Gertrudix, Manuel ; Romero-Luis, Juan ; Carbonell-Alcocer, Alejandro.
    In: Data.
    RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:8:y:2023:i:5:p:84-:d:1137766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Dont forget the locals: Understanding citizens acceptance of bio-based technologies. (2023). Hartmann, Monika ; Klink-Lehmann, Jeanette ; Macht, Janine.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:74:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x23001239.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Towards a holistic and integrated Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of the bioeconomy: Background on concepts, visions and measurements. (2020). Thran, Daniela ; Bezama, Alberto ; Zeug, Walther.
    In: UFZ Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:72020.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. A Regional Socio-Economic Life Cycle Assessment of a Bioeconomy Value Chain. (2020). Zeug, Walther ; Finkbeiner, Matthias ; Jarosch, Lena ; Thran, Daniela ; Bezama, Alberto.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1259-:d:318591.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. A report from the German Bioeconomy Council Bioeconomy Policy (Part III) Update Report of National Strategies around the World. 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. ‘A European strategy for Key Enabling Technologies—A bridge to growth and jobs’ (Text with EEA relevance). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2012). 2012, 341 Final.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  3. Arancibia F. Challenging the bioeconomy: The dynamics of collective action in Argentina. Technol. Soc. 2013, 35, 79-92.

  4. Arbolino R.; Boffardi R.; Ioppolo G. The effectiveness of European energy policy on the Italian system: Regional evidences from a hierarchical cluster analysis approach. Energy Policy 2019.

  5. Balkau F.; Bezama A. Life cycle methodologies for building circular economy in cities and regions. Waste Manag. Res. 2019, 37, 765-766.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Battista F.; Frison N.; Pavan P.; Cavinato C.; Gottardo M.; Fatone F.; Eusebi A.L.; Majone M.; Zeppilli M.; Valentino F. Food wastes and sewage sludge as feedstock for an urban biorefinery producing biofuels and added-value bioproducts. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Bezama A. Let us discuss how cascading can help implement the circular economy and the bio-economy strategies. Waste Manag. Res. 2016, 34, 593-594.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bezama A. Understanding the systems that characterise the circular economy and the bioeconomy. Waste Manag. Res. 2018, 36, 553-554.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bezama A.; Agamuthu P. Addressing the big issues in waste management. Waste Manag. Res. 2019, 37, 1-3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Biber-Freudenberger L.; Basukala A.; Bruckner M.; Börner J. Sustainability Performance of National Bio-Economies. Sustainability 2018, 10.

  11. BioEconomy 2030—Our Route towards a Biobased Economy; Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Public Relations Division: Berlin, Germany, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Bioeconomy Development in EU Regions. Mapping of EU Member States’/Regions’ Research and Innovation Plans & Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3) on Bioeconomy for 2014–2020. 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Blok V.; Long T.B.; Idil Gaziulusoy A.M.; Ciliz N.; Lozano R.; Huisingh D.; Csutora M.; Boks C. From best practices to bridges for a more sustainable future: Advances and challenges in the transition to global sustainable production and consumption: Introduction to the ERSCP stream of the Special volume. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 108, 19-30.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Brantes Ferreira J.; da Rocha A.; Ferreira da Silva J. Impacts of technology readiness on emotions and cognition in Brazil. J. Bus. Res. 2014, 67, 865-873.

  15. Brosowski A.; Krause T.; Mantau U.; Mahro B.; Noke A.; Richter F.; Raussen T.; Bischof T.; Hering T.; Blanke C. How to measure the impact of biogenic residues, wastes and by-products: Development of a national resource monitoring based on the example of Germany. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 127, 105275.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Budzinski M.; Bezama A.; Thrän D. Monitoring the progress towards bioeconomy using multi-regional input-output analysis: The example of wood use in Germany. J. Clean. Prod. 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Budzinski M.; Sisca M.; Thrän D. Consequential LCA and LCC using linear programming: An illustrative example of biorefineries. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2019, 24, 2191-2205.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Buijs A.E.; Mattijssen T.J.M.; Van der Jagt A.P.N.; Ambrose-Oji B.; Andersson E.; Elands B.H.M.; Møller M.S. Active citizenship for urban green infrastructure: Fostering the diversity and dynamics of citizen contributions through mosaic governance. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2017, 22, 1-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Case Studies of Regional Bioeconomy Strategies across Europe. 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; COM: Brussels, Belgium, 2012. Overbeek G.; de Bakker E.; Beekman V.; Davies S.; Kiresiewa Z.; Delbrück S.; Ribeiro B.; Stoyanov M.; Vale M. Review of Bioeconomy Strategies at Regional and National Levels. Report D2.3. of the BioSTEP Project, Grant Agreement n°652682.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Corsatea T.D. Increasing synergies between institutions and technology developers: Lessons from marine energy. Energy Policy 2014, 74, 682-696.

  22. Costa C.; Fontes M.; Heitor M.V. A methodological approach to the marketing process in the biotechnology-based companies. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2004, 33, 403-418.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Coyle P.E. The missing Middle. National Security and International Affairs. Off. Sci. Technol. Policy May 2011, 10, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. De Jong E.; Jungmeier G. Biorefinery Concepts in Comparison to Petrochemical Refineries. Industrial Biorefineries & White Biotechnology; Pandey A.; Hofer R.; Larroche C.; Taherzadeh M.; Nampoothiri M. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 3-33, ISBN 978-0-444-63453-5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  25. Devine-Wright P.; Batel S.; Aas O.; Sovacool B.; Labelle M.C.; Ruud A. A conceptual framework for understanding the social acceptance of energy infrastructure: Insights from energy storage. Energy Policy 2017, 107, 27-31.

  26. El-Chichakli B.; von Braun J.; Lange C.; Barben D.; Philp J. Five cornerstones of a global bioeconomy. Nature 2016, 535, 221-223.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Esteban L.S.; Carrasco J.E. Biomass resources and costs: Assessment in different EU countries. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, S21-S30.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Falcone P.M.; Imbert E. Social Life Cycle Approach as a Tool for Promoting the Market Uptake of Bio-Based Products from a Consumer Perspective. Sustainability 2018, 10.

  29. For a European Industrial Renaissance {SWD(2014). 2014, 14 final} Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2014) 14 Final.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Friedl C.; Reichl J. Realizing energy infrastructure projects—A qualitative empirical analysis of local practices to address social acceptance. Energy Policy 2016, 89, 184-193.

  31. Gardner J.; Webster A. The social management of biomedical novelty: Facilitating translation in regenerative medicine. Soc. Sci. Med. 2016, 156, 90-97.

  32. Gawel E.; Pannicke N.; Hagemann N. A Path Transition Towards a Bioeconomy—The Crucial Role of Sustainability. Sustainability 2019, 11.

  33. Giampietro M. On the Circular Bioeconomy and Decoupling: Implications for Sustainable Growth. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 162, 143-156.

  34. Giannetti B.F.; Agostinho F.; Almeida C.M.V.B.; Huisingh D. A review of limitations of GDP and alternative indices to monitor human wellbeing and to manage eco-system functionality. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 87, 11-25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Golembiewski B.; Sick N.; Bröring S. The emerging research landscape on bioeconomy:What has been done so far and what is essential from a technology and innovation management perspective?. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2015, 29, 308-317.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Höglmeier K.; Weber-Blaschke G.; Richter K. Potentials for cascading of recovered wood from building deconstruction—A case study for south-east Germany. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Helander H.; Petit-Boix A.; Leipold S.; Bringezu S. How to monitor environmental pressures of a circular economy: An assessment of indicators. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019.

  38. Hildebrandt J.; Bezama A.; Thrän D. Cascade use indicators for selected biopolymers: Are we aiming for the right solutions in design for recycling (DfR) of bio-based composites and polymers?. Waste Manag. Res. 2017, 35, 367-378.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Hildebrandt J.; Budzinski M.; Nitzsche R.; Weber A.; Krombholz A.; Thrän D.; Bezama A. Assessing the technical and environmental performance of wood-based fiber laminates with lignin based phenolic resin systems. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 141, 455-464.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Hildebrandt J.; O’Keeffe S.; Bezama A.; Thrän D. Revealing the environmental advantages of industrial symbiosis in wood-based bioeconomy networks: An assessment from a life cycle perspective. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019, 23, 808-822.

  41. Hurmekoski E.; Lovrić M.; Lovrić N.; Hetemäki L.; Winkel G. Frontiers of the forest-based bioeconomy—A European Delphi study. For. Policy Econ. 2019, 102, 86-99.

  42. Ingrao C.; Arcidiacono C.; Bezama A.; Ioppolo G.; Winans K.; Koutinas A.; Gallego-Schmid A. Sustainability issues of by-product and waste management systems, to produce building material commodities: A comprehensive review of findings from a virtual special issue. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 146, 358-365.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Ingrao C.; Bacenetti J.; Bezama A.; Blok V.; Goglio P.; Koukios E.G.; Lindner M.; Nemecek T.; Siracusa V.; Zabaniotou A. The potential roles of bio-economy in the transition to equitable, sustainable, post fossil-carbon societies: Findings from this virtual special issue. J. Clean Prod. 2018, 204, 471-488.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Ireland D.C.; Hine D. Harmonizing science and business agendas for growth in new biotechnology firms: Case comparisons from five countries. Technovation 2007, 27, 676-692.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Jacquet N.; Haubruge E.; Richel A. Production of biofuels and biomolecules in the framework of circular economy: A regional case study. Waste Manag. Res. 2015, 33, 1121-1126.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Janáková H. The Success Prediction of the Technological Start –up Projects in Slovak Conditions. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015, 34, 73-80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Johnson T.G.; Altman I. Rural development opportunities in the bioeconomy. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 63, 341-344.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Kühnen M.; Hahn R. Indicators in Social Life Cycle Assessment: A Review of Frameworks, Theories, and Empirical Experience. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 1547-1565.

  49. Karliczek A. Speech on the Occasion of the Global Bioeconomy Summit. 2016, 2018; German Federal Minister of Education and Research: Berlin, Germany, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Knockaert M.; Manigart S.; Cattoir S.; Verstraete W. A perspective on the economic valorization of gene manipulated biotechnology: Past and future. Biotechnol. Rep. 2015, 6, 56-60.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Kokkinos K.; Lakioti E.; Papageorgiou E.; Moustakas K.; Karayannis V. Fuzzy Cognitive Map-Based Modeling of Social Acceptance to Overcome Uncertainties in Establishing Waste Biorefinery Facilities. Front. Energy Res. 2018, 6, 112.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Kwong Goh S.; Balaji M.S. Linking green skepticism to green purchase behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 131, 629-638.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Lainez M.; González J.M.; Aguilar A.; Vela C. Spanish strategy on bioeconomy: Towards a knowledge based sustainable innovation. New Biotechnol. 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  54. Levidow L.; Borda-Rodriguez A.; Papaioannou T. UK bioenergy innovation priorities: Making expectations credible in state-industry arenas. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 87, 191-204.

  55. Lieder M.; Rashid A. Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 115, 36-51.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Long T.B.; Blok V.; Coninx I. Barriers to the adoption and diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture in Europe: Evidence from the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Italy. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 9-21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  57. Longato D.; Lucertini G.; Dalla Fontana M.; Musco F. Including Urban Metabolism Principles in Decision-Making: A Methodology for Planning Waste and Resource Management. Sustainability 2019, 11.

  58. Macombe C.; Leskinen P.; Feschet P.; Antikainen R. Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: A literature review and development needs. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 52, 205-216.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  59. Martin M.; Røyne F.; Ekvall T.; Moberg Å. Life Cycle Sustainability Evaluations of Bio-based Value Chains: Reviewing the Indicators from A Swedish Perspective. Sustainability 2018, 10.

  60. Matos L.B.; Ipiranga A.S. The translations and the organizing of scientific practices in R&D biotechnology. Rev. Adm. 2017, 52, 199-211.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. McCauley S.M.; Stephens J.C. Green energy clusters and socio-technical transitions: Analysis of a sustainable energy cluster for regional economic development in Central Massachusetts, USA. Sustain. Sci. 2012, 7, 213-225.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Moshelion M.; Altman A. Current challenges and future perspectives of plant and agricultural biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 337-342.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Mustalahti I. The Responsive Bioeconomy: The need for inclusion of citizens and environmental capability in the forest based bioeconomy. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 3781-3790.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. NASA—National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2010): Technology Readiness Levels Demystified. 31 July 2015. Editor: NASA Administrator.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  65. Novotny M.; Nuur C. The transformation of the pulp & paper industries: The role of networks and institutions. Int. J. Innov. Reg. Dev. 2013, 5, 42-57.

  66. O’Keeffe S.; Franko U.; Oehmichen K.; Daniel-Gromke J.; Thrän D. Give them Credit- the GHG performance of regional biogas systems. GCB Bioenergy 2019, 11, 791-808.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. O’Keeffe S.; Majer S.; Bezama A.; Thrän D. When considering no man is an island—Assessing bioenergy systems in a regional and LCA context: A review. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2016, 21, 885-902.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. O’Keeffe S.; Wochele-Marx S.; Thrän D. RELCA: A REgional Life Cycle inventory for Assessing bioenergy systems within a region. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2016, 6, 1-19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. O’Keeffe S.M. Alternative Use of Grassland Biomass for Biorefinery in Ireland: A Scoping Study. Ph.D. Thesis; Wageningen University: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2010; ISBN 978-90-8585-809-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  70. Pätäri S.; Tuppura A.; Toppinen A.; Korhonen J. Global sustainability megaforces in shaping the future of the European pulp and paper industry towards a bioeconomy. For. Policy Econ. 2016, 66, 38-46.

  71. Panoutsou C.; Pantaleo M.; Dees M.; Elbersen B.; Iriarte L.; Fritsche U.; Glavonjic B.; Stojadinovic D.; Zhelyezna T.; Carrez D. Overview Report on the Current Status of Biomass for Bioenergy, Biofuels and Biomaterials in Europe; Imperial College: London, UK, 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Popp J.; Lakner Z.; Harangi-Rákos M.; Fári M. The effect of bioenergy expansion: Food, energy, and environment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 559-578.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Prieler M.; Lindorfer J.; Steinmüller H. Life-cycle assessment of green biorefinery process options. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Radgen P.; Irons R.; Schoenmakers H. Too Early or Too Late for CCS—What Needs to be Done to Overcome the Valley of Death for Carbon Capture and Storage in Europe?. Energy Procedia 2013, 37, 6189-6201.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  75. Rafiaani P.; Kuppens T.; Van Dael M.; Azadi H.; Lebailly P.; Van Passel S. Social sustainability assessments in the biobased economy: Towards a systemic approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 1839-1853.

  76. Reißmann D.; Thrän D.; Bezama A. Key development factors of hydrothermal processes in Germany by. 2018, 2030, A fuzzy logic analysis. Energies 2018, 11.

  77. Reißmann D.; Thrän D.; Bezama A. Techno-economic and environmental suitability criteria of hydrothermal processes for treating biogenic residues: A SWOT analysis approach. J. Clean Prod. 2018, 200, 293-304.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Renewable Resources and Biotechnological Processes as a Basis for Food, Industry and Energy; BMEL: Berlin, Germany, 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Rybicka J.; Tiwari A.; Leeke G.A. Technology readiness level assessment of composites recycling technologies. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 1001-1012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Saguy S. Academia-industry Innovation Interaction: Paradigm Shifts and Avenues for the Future. Procedia Food Science 2011, 1, 1875-1882.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Savaneviciene A.; Venckuviene V.; Girdauskiene L. Venture Capital a Catalyst for Start-Ups to Overcome the “Valley of Death”: Lithuanian Case. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015, 26, 1052-1059.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Scarlat N.; Dallemand J.F.; Monforti-Ferrario F.; Nita V. The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts. Environ. Dev. 2015, 15, 3-34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Scarpellini S.; Portillo-Tarragona P.; Aranda-Usón A.; Llena-Macarulla F. Definition and measurement of the circular economy’s regional impact. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2019, 62, 2211-2223.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Siebert A.; Bezama A.; O’Keeffe S.; Thrän D. Social life cycle assessment indices and indicators to monitor the social implications of wood-based products. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 4074-4084.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Siebert A.; Bezama A.; O’Keeffe S.; Thrän D. Social life cycle assessment: In pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018, 23, 651-662.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Siebert A.; O’Keeffe S.; Bezama A.; Zeug W.; Thrän D. How not to compare apples and oranges: Generate context-specific performance reference points for a social life cycle assessment model. J. Clean Prod. 2018, 198, 587-600.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Sisto R.; van Vliet M.; Prosperi M. Puzzling stakeholder views for long-term planning in the bio-economy: A back-casting application. Futures 2015, 76.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Skardon J. The role of trust in innovation networks. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2011, 26, 85-93.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Slayton R.; Spinardi G. Radical innovation in scaling up: Boeing’s Dreamliner and the challenge of socio-technical transitions. Technovation 2016, 47, 47-58.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  90. Strazzera E.; Statzu V. Fostering photovoltaic technologies in Mediterranean cities: Consumers’ demand and social acceptance. Renew. Energy 2017, 102, 361-371.

  91. Takala T.; Tikkanen J.; Haapala A.; Pitkänen S.; Torssonen P.; Valkeavirta R.; Pöykkö T. Shaping the concept of bioeconomy in participatory projects—An example from the post-graduate education in Finland. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 221, 176-188.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Tang J.P.; Lam H.L.; Abdul Aziz H.L.; Morad N.A. Palm biomass strategic resource management—A competitive game analysis. Energy 2017, 118, 456-463.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. Thompson N.A.; Herrmann A.M.; Hekkert M.P. How sustainable entrepreneurs engage in institutional change: Insights from biomass torrefaction in the Netherlands. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 106, 608-618.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Thrän D.; Bezama A. The knowledge-based bioeconomy and its impact in our working field. Waste Manag. Res. 2017, 35, 689-690.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  95. Tonini D.; Vadenbo C.; Astrup T.F. Priority of domestic biomass resources for energy: Importance of national environmental targets in a climate perspective. Energy 2017, 124, 295-309.

  96. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Technology and Innovation Report. 2011, 2011—Powering Development with Renewable Energy Technologies. United Nations Publication UNCTAD/TIR/2011. ISBN 978-92-1-112840-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  97. van der Vooren A.; Alkemade F.; Hekkert M. Effective public resource allocation to escape lock-in: The case of infrastructure-dependent vehicle technologies. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2012, 2, 98-117.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  98. Vence X.; Pereira A. Eco-innovation and Circular Business Models as drivers for a circular economy. Contaduría y Administración. Espec. Innov. 2018, 64, 1-19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  99. Walmsley T.G.; Ong B.; Klemeš J.J.; Varbanov P.S.; Tan R.R. Circular Integration of processes, industries, and economies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 107, 507-515.

  100. Wang J.; Yang Y.; Bentley Y.; Geng X.; Liu X. Sustainability Assessment of Bioenergy from a Global Perspective: A Review. Sustainability 2018, 10.

  101. Wydra S. Value Chains for Industrial Biotechnology in the Bioeconomy-Innovation System Analysis. Sustainability 2019, 11.

  102. Zeug W.; Bezama A.; Moesenfechtel U.; Jähkel A.; Thrän D. Stakeholders’ interests and perceptions of bioeconomy monitoring using a sustainable development goal framework. Sustainability 2019, 11.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The Socio-Economic Perspective for the Guns Vs. Butter Trade-Off in the European Union Countries. (2025). Gbor, Kutasi ; Grzegorz, Waszkiewicz ; Dm, Marton.
    In: Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia.
    RePEc:vrs:foeste:v:25:y:2025:i:1:p:337-353:n:1017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Circular economy convergence across European Union: Evidence on the role policy diffusion and domestic mechanisms. (2024). Lopes, Alexandra ; Boffardi, Raffaele ; Arbolino, Roberta ; Ioppolo, G ; de Simone, L.
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:96:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124002507.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Conceptual evolution of the bioeconomy: a bibliometric analysis. (2022). Mougenot, Benoît ; Doussoulin, Jean Pierre.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01481-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. An Analysis of the Development of Modular Building Design Elements to Improve Thermal Performance of a Representative High Rise Residential Estate in the Coastline City of Famagusta, Cyprus. (2022). Altan, Hasim ; Ozarisoy, Bertug.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4065-:d:782571.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Environmental governance effects of local environmental protection expenditure in China. (2022). Fan, Wei ; Ding, Wangwang ; Wang, Ping ; Yan, Ling ; Chen, Boyang.
    In: Resources Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:77:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722002082.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review. (2022). Jimenez-Caballero, Paula ; Zarauz, Irene ; Sanz-Hernandez, Alexia.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:141:y:2022:i:c:s1389934122000740.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Significance of occupancy patterns and habitual household adaptive behaviour on home-energy performance of post-war social-housing estate in the South-eastern Mediterranean climate: Energy policy design. (2022). Altan, H ; Ozarisoy, B.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:244:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544221031534.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. International ranking of climate change action: An analysis using the indicators from the Climate Change Performance Index. (2021). Puertas, R ; Marti, L.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:148:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121006031.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Multi-sectoral determinants of carbon emission inequality in Chinese clustering cities. (2021). Fan, Wei ; Cheng, Shulei ; Wang, Ning ; Zhang, Jian ; Liu, Gengyuan ; Meng, Fanxin.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:214:y:2021:i:c:s036054422032051x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Understanding the bioeconomy: a new sustainability economy in British and European public discourse. (2021). Deutz, Pauline ; Sotiropoulou, Irene.
    In: Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal.
    RePEc:ags:aieabj:320231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Do sustainable energy policies matter for reducing greenhouse gas emissions?. (2020). Baiardi, Donatella.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:mib:wpaper:425.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Energy Policy Concerns, Objectives and Indicators: A Review towards a Framework for Effectiveness Assessment. (2020). Leal, Vitor ; Ortiz, Dania.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:24:p:6533-:d:460099.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Assessing the Performance of Sustainable Development Goals of EU Countries: Hard and Soft Data Integration. (2020). Nazarko, Joanicjusz ; Chodakowska, Ewa.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3439-:d:379898.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Do sustainable energy policies matter for reducing air pollution?. (2020). Baiardi, Donatella.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:140:y:2020:i:c:s0301421520301208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Making a Place for Alternative Technologies: The Case of Agricultural Bio‐Inputs in Argentina. (2020). Hubert, Matthieu ; Goulet, Frederic.
    In: Review of Policy Research.
    RePEc:bla:revpol:v:37:y:2020:i:4:p:535-555.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Environmental Engel curves in Italy: A spatial econometric investigation. (2020). Baudino, Marco.
    In: Papers in Regional Science.
    RePEc:bla:presci:v:99:y:2020:i:4:p:999-1018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Resources, Collaborators, and Neighbors: The Three-Pronged Challenge in the Implementation of Bioeconomy Regions. (2019). Okeeffe, Sinead ; Thran, Daniela ; Ingrao, Carlo ; Bezama, Alberto.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7235-:d:298759.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Theorizing Food Sovereignty from a Class-Analytical Lens: The Case of Agrarian Mobilization in Argentina. (2018). .
    In: Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:sae:agspub:v:7:y:2018:i:3:p:320-350.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Is GM Soybean cultivation in Argentina sustainable ?. (2018). PHELINAS, Pascale ; Choumert-Nkolo, Johanna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:ird-01875358.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Using Insights from Prospect Theory to Enhance Sustainable Decision Making by Agribusinesses in Argentina. (2018). Gonzalez-Ramirez, Jimena ; Arora, Poonam ; Podesta, Guillermo.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2693-:d:161242.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. A Systematic Literature Review of Bio, Green and Circular Economy Trends in Publications in the Field of Economics and Business Management. (2018). Ferreira, Valeria ; Gregorio, Valeria Ferreira ; Pie, Laia ; Terceo, Antonio.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4232-:d:183348.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Regulating transgenic soybean production in Argentina. (2017). Schwartz, Sonia ; PHELINAS, Pascale.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01656924.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable?. (2017). PHELINAS, Pascale ; Choumert-Nkolo, Johanna.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:99:y:2017:i:c:p:452-462.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Regulating transgenic soybean production in Argentina. (2017). Schwartz, Sonia ; PHELINAS, Pascale.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cdi:wpaper:1897.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Is there a strategy in China’s health official development assistance to African countries?. (2017). Guillon, Marlene ; Mathonnat, Jacky.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cdi:wpaper:1895.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable?. (2016). PHELINAS, Pascale ; Choumert-Nkolo, Johanna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01356209.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Conflicting interests of ecosystem services: Multi-criteria modelling and indirect evaluation of trade-offs between monetary and non-monetary measures. (2016). Hofstad, Ole ; Bunnefeld, Nils ; Clarke, Nicholas ; Wam, Hilde Karine.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:22:y:2016:i:pb:p:280-288.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable?. (2016). PHELINAS, Pascale ; Choumert-Nkolo, Johanna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cdi:wpaper:1818.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Seeing GMOs from a Systems Perspective: The Need for Comparative Cartographies of Agri/Cultures for Sustainability Assessment. (2015). Binimelis, Rosa ; Wickson, Fern ; Herrero, Amaranta .
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:8:p:11321-11344:d:54496.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Visions of Sustainability in Bioeconomy Research. (2014). Pfau, Swinda F. ; Hagens, Janneke E. ; Dankbaar, Ben ; Antoine J. M. Smits, .
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:3:p:1222-1249:d:33738.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 02:50:09 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.