create a website

Value Relevance of Corporate Environmental Performance: A Comprehensive Analysis of Performance Indicators Using Korean Data. (2020). Lee, Jaywon ; Han, Ingoo ; Choi, Hyunwoo.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7209-:d:408345.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 5

Citations received by this document

Cites: 44

References cited by this document

Cocites: 46

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Indicators to analyze environmental performance and eco-controls for a poultry production chain: a methodological proposal based on the EMA system. (2024). da Silva, Fabricia ; Wander, Alcido Elenor ; Vieira, Valquria Duarte.
    In: Environment Systems and Decisions.
    RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:44:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10669-023-09918-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The environmental and financial performances on the energy sector. Case study in North America. (2023). Niu, Loredana-Georgia.
    In: Journal of Financial Studies.
    RePEc:fst:rfsisf:v:8:y:2023:i:special-june_2023:p:151-165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The environmental and financial performances on the energy sector. Case study in North America. (2023). Niu, Loredana-Georgia.
    In: Journal of Financial Studies.
    RePEc:fst:rfsisf:v:14-special-june:y:2023:i:8:p:151-165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Value Relevance of Corporate Sustainability Performance (CSP). (2022). Jadoon, Imran Abbas ; Ali, Akhtar.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9098-:d:871108.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Corporate Environmental Performance in China: The Moderating Effects of the Media versus the Approach of Local Governments. (2020). Guo, Zhiru ; Lu, Chao.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:150-:d:469341.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Barth M.E.; Clinch G. Scale effects in capital markets-based accounting research. J. Bus. Financ. Account. 2009, 36, 253-288.

  2. Barth M.E.; Kallapur S. The Effects of Cross-Sectional Scale Differences on Regression Results in Empirical Accounting Research. Contemp. Account. Res. 1996, 13, 527-567.

  3. Barth M.E.; McNichols M.F. Estimation and market valuation of environmental liabilities relating to superfund sites. J. Account. Res. 1994, 32, 177-209.

  4. Chapple L.; Clarkson P.M.; Gold D.L. The cost of carbon: Capital market effects of the proposed emission trading scheme (ETS). Abacus 2013, 49, 1-33.

  5. Cho C.H.; Patten D.M. The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Account. Organ. Soc. 2007, 32, 639-647.

  6. Clarkson P.M.; Li Y.; Richardson G.D. The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies. Account. Rev. 2004, 79, 329-353.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Clemens B.; Bakstran L.; Hamakawa C. Reliable categories of environmental policies. Int. J. Sustain. Strateg. Manag. 2010, 2, 234-255.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Connors E.; Johnston H.H.; Gao L.S. The informational value of Toxics Release Inventory performance. Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J. 2013, 4, 32-55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Cormier D.; Magnan M. Investors’ assessment of implicit environmental liabilities: An empirical investigation. J. Account. Public Policy 1997, 16, 215-241.

  10. Dixon-Fowler H.R.; Slater D.J.; Johnson J.L.; Ellstrand A.E.; Romi A.M. Beyond “does it pay to be green?” A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP–CFP relationship. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 112, 353-3366.

  11. Dowell G.; Hart S.; Yeung B. Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value?. Manag. Sci. 2000, 46, 1059-1074.

  12. Easton P.D.; Sommers G.A. Scale and the Scale Effect in Market-based Accounting Research. J. Bus. Financ. Account. 2003, 30, 25-56.

  13. Edwards J.R. Construct validation in organizational behavior research. Organizational Behavior: A Management Challenge; Psychology Press: Hove, UK, 2003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Etzion D. Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. J. Manag. 2007, 33, 637-664.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Fabrigar L.R.; Wegener D.T.; MacCallum R.C.; Strahan E.J. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol. Methods 1999, 4, 272.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Gil-Alana L.A.; Iniguez-Sanchez R.; López-Espinosa G. Endogenous problems in cross-sectional valuation models based on accounting information. Rev. Quant. Financ. Account. 2011, 37, 245-265.

  17. Granger C.W. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econom. J. Econom. Soc. 1969, 424-438.

  18. Gray R.; Kouhy R.; Lavers S. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Account. Audit. Account. J. 1995, 8, 47-77.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Hart S.L.; Ahuja G. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 1996, 5, 30-37.

  20. Hughes K. The value relevance of nonfinancial measures of air pollution in the electric utility industry. Account. Rev. 2000, 75, 209-228.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Hunter J.E.; Schmidt F.L. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings; Sage: London, UK, 2004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. ISO 14031: 2013. Environmental Performance Evaluation–Guidelines; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Jiang C.; Fu Q. A Win-Win Outcome between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Value: From the Perspective of Stakeholders. Sustainability 2019, 11.

  24. Jo H.; Kim H.; Park K. Corporate environmental responsibility and firm performance in the financial services sector. J. Bus. Ethics 2015, 131, 257-284.

  25. Johnston D.M.; Sefcik S.E.; Soderstrom N.S. The value relevance of greenhouse gas emissions allowances: An exploratory study in the related United States SO2 market. Eur. Account. Rev. 2008, 17, 747-764.

  26. Kim H.; Park K.; Ryu D. Corporate Environmental Responsibility: A Legal Origins Perspective. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 140, 381-402.

  27. Konar S.; Cohen M.A. Information as regulation: The effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1997, 32, 109-124.

  28. Larcker D.F.; Richardson S.A.; Tuna I. Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. Account. Rev. 2007, 82, 963-1008.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Lennox C.S.; Francis J.R.; Wang Z. Selection models in accounting research. Account. Rev. 2011, 87, 589-616.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Matsumura E.M.; Prakash R. Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions and Carbon Disclosures. Account. Rev. 2014, 89, 695-724.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. McWilliams A.; Siegel D. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?. Strateg. Manag. J. 2000, 21, 603-609.

  32. Miralles-Quirós M.; Miralles-Quirós J.; Gonçalves L. The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance performance: The Brazilian Case. Sustainability 2018, 10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Ohlson J.A. Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemp. Account. Res. 1995, 11, 661-687.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Rahman N.; Post C. Measurement issues in environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR): Toward a transparent, reliable, and construct valid instrument. J. Bus. Ethics 2012, 105, 307-319.

  35. Reverte C. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market valuation: Evidence from Spanish listed firms. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2016, 10, 411-435.

  36. Song M.K.; Lin F.C.; Ward S.E.; Fine J.P. Composite variables: When and how. Nurs. Res. 2013, 62, 45-49.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Sutopo B.; Kot S.; Adiati A.; Ardila L. Sustainability Reporting and Value Relevance of Financial Statements. Sustainability 2018, 10.

  38. The Revised Plan of the National Roadmap for Greenhouse Gas Reductions by 2030 and the Plan for the National Greenhouse Gas Emission Permit Allocation from 2018 to 2020 are Finalized.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Trumpp C.; Endrikat J.; Zopf C.; Guenther E. Definition, conceptualization, and measurement of corporate environmental performance: A critical examination of a multidimensional construct. J. Bus. Ethics 2015, 126, 185-204.

  40. Trumpp C.; Guenther T. Too little or too much? Exploring U-shaped relationships between corporate environmental performance and corporate financial performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2017, 26, 49-68.

  41. Wong C.S.; Law K.S.; Huang G.H. On the importance of conducting construct-level analysis for multidimensional constructs in theory development and testing. J. Manag. 2008, 34, 744-764.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Xie S.; Hayase K. Corporate environmental performance evaluation: A measurement model and a new concept. Bus. Strategye Environ. 2007, 16, 148-168.

  43. Ziegler A.; Busch T.; Hoffmann V.H. Disclosed corporate responses to climate change and stock performance: An international empirical analysis. Energy Econ. 2011, 33, 1283-1294.

  44. Ziliak S.T.; McCloskey D.N. Size matters: The standard error of regressions in the American Economic Review. J. Socio Econ. 2004, 33, 527-546.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Leveraging stakeholder engagement for market value growth: Empirical evidence on sustainable development leadership in Europe. (2024). Ravenda, Diego ; Argilsbosch, Josep Maria ; Garciablandon, Josep.
    In: Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:1:p:336-347.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Going green: Environmental risk management, market value and performance. (2024). Gianfagna, Laura ; Lattanzi, Nicola ; Maso, Lorenzo Dal ; Maglione, Federico.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:1:p:122-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. ESG Score and Market Value: The Role of the Family Firm Evidence from the Italian Listed Market. (2024). Tiscini, Riccardo ; Bifulco, Giuseppe Maria.
    In: Journal of Management and Sustainability.
    RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Firm-specific climate risk and market valuation. (2024). berkman, henk ; Soderstrom, Naomi ; Jona, Jonathan.
    In: Accounting, Organizations and Society.
    RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:112:y:2024:i:c:s0361368224000072.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The CSR committee as moderator for the ESG score and market value. (2023). Tiscini, Riccardo ; Savio, Riccardo ; Bifulco, Giuseppe Maria ; Paolone, Francesco.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:6:p:3231-3241.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Public peers, accounting comparability, and value relevance of private firms’ financial reporting. (2023). Pierk, Jochen ; Elfers, Ferdinand ; Chen, Jason V ; Bourveau, Thomas.
    In: Review of Accounting Studies.
    RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:28:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11142-022-09707-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Another look at the dividend-price relationship in the accounting valuation framework. (2023). Sen, Pradyot K ; Easterday, Kathryn E.
    In: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting.
    RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:61:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11156-023-01167-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Industry and Stakeholder Impacts on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Financial Performance: Consumer vs. Industrial Sectors. (2023). Tooley, Stuart ; Sands, John ; Arian, Adam.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12254-:d:1214794.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Perpetual securities and stock prices: Korean evidence. (2023). Kim, Young Jun ; Lee, Su Jeong ; Choi, Sera.
    In: Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jocaae:v:19:y:2023:i:1:s1815566922000352.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Costs and benefits of auditors disclosure of critical audit matters: Initial evidence from the United States. (2023). Luo, Yan ; Li, Valerie.
    In: Advances in accounting.
    RePEc:eee:advacc:v:60:y:2023:i:c:s0882611022000608.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. ESG Risks and the Value Relevance of Current and Historical Earnings. (2022). Cheng, Mingying ; Micale, Joseph A.
    In: Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments.
    RePEc:wly:finmar:v:31:y:2022:i:5:p:207-237.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Causality redux: The evolution of empirical methods in accounting research and the growth of quasi-experiments. (2022). Kepler, John D ; Samuels, Delphine ; Taylor, Daniel ; Armstrong, Christopher.
    In: Journal of Accounting and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:74:y:2022:i:2:s0165410122000441.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. The impact of banking regulations and accounting standards on estimating discretionary loan loss provisions. (2022). Guhathakurta, Kousik ; Pandey, Ashish ; Tripathi, Abhinava.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:44:y:2022:i:c:s1544612321001495.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Value relevance of loan loss provision components and the choice of model specification. (2022). Guhathakurta, Kousik ; Pandey, Ashish.
    In: Advances in accounting.
    RePEc:eee:advacc:v:58:y:2022:i:c:s0882611022000190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Do investors value audit quality of complex estimates?. (2022). Chen, Bingyi.
    In: Advances in accounting.
    RePEc:eee:advacc:v:57:y:2022:i:c:s0882611022000141.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Intangible Investments, Scaling, and the Trend in the Accrual–Cash Flow Association. (2022). Green, Jeremiah ; Sani, Jalal ; Louis, Henock.
    In: Journal of Accounting Research.
    RePEc:bla:joares:v:60:y:2022:i:4:p:1551-1582.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The use and usefulness of equity accounting. (2022). Scott, Tom ; Bradbury, Michael E ; Mehnaz, Laura.
    In: Accounting and Finance.
    RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:62:y:2022:i:s1:p:1957-1981.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The impact of IFRS adoption on the value relevance of accounting information in Saudi Arabia. (2022). Yang, Helen Hong ; Farley, Alan ; Alomair, Abdulrahman.
    In: Accounting and Finance.
    RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:62:y:2022:i:2:p:2839-2878.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Do investors value the voluntary assurance of sustainability information? Evidence from the Spanish stock market. (2021). Reverte, Carmelo.
    In: Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:29:y:2021:i:5:p:793-809.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The effect of corporate governance and investor protection environments on the value relevance of new accounting standards: the case of IFRS 9 and IAS 39. (2021). Cimini, Riccardo ; Mechelli, Alessandro.
    In: Journal of Management & Governance.
    RePEc:kap:jmgtgv:v:25:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10997-020-09551-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Reporting Technologies and Textual Readability: Evidence from the XBRL Mandate. (2021). Li, Xitong ; Zuo, Luo ; Zhu, Hongwei.
    In: Information Systems Research.
    RePEc:inm:orisre:v:32:y:2021:i:3:p:1025-1042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Core earnings: New data and evidence. (2021). Rouen, Ethan ; So, Eric C.
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:142:y:2021:i:3:p:1068-1091.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Stock price relevance of voluntary disclosures about blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. (2021). Wang, Tawei ; Yen, Ju-Chun.
    In: International Journal of Accounting Information Systems.
    RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:40:y:2021:i:c:s1467089521000014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The curious case of Canadian corporate emissions valuation. (2021). Lont, David ; Griffin, Paul A ; Pomare, Carol.
    In: The British Accounting Review.
    RePEc:eee:bracre:v:53:y:2021:i:1:s0890838920300421.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The ability of deferred tax to predict future tax. (2021). Bradbury, Michael ; Mear, Kim ; Hooks, Jill.
    In: Accounting and Finance.
    RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:61:y:2021:i:1:p:241-264.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Re‐exploring Fair Value Accounting and Value Relevance: An Examination of Underlying Securities. (2021). Fortin, Steve ; Magnan, Michel ; Hammami, Ahmad.
    In: Abacus.
    RePEc:bla:abacus:v:57:y:2021:i:2:p:220-250.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Implications of the Joint Provision of CSR Assurance and Financial Audit for Auditors Assessment of Going‐Concern Risk†. (2020). Mazzi, Francesco ; Paugam, Luc ; Maso, Lorenzo Dal ; Lobo, Gerald J.
    In: Contemporary Accounting Research.
    RePEc:wly:coacre:v:37:y:2020:i:2:p:1248-1289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The market’s reaction to changes in relative performance rankings. (2020). Soliman, Mark T ; Jennings, Jared ; Seo, Hojun.
    In: Review of Accounting Studies.
    RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:25:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11142-020-09532-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Value Relevance of Corporate Environmental Performance: A Comprehensive Analysis of Performance Indicators Using Korean Data. (2020). Lee, Jaywon ; Han, Ingoo ; Choi, Hyunwoo.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7209-:d:408345.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The impact of legal efficacy on value relevance of the three-level fair value measurement hierarchy. (2020). Morris, Richard D ; Liao, Lin ; Kang, Helen ; Yao, Daifei.
    In: Pacific-Basin Finance Journal.
    RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:59:y:2020:i:c:s0927538x18303706.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Do investors value companies mandatory nonfinancial risk disclosure? An empirical analysis of the Italian context after the EU Directive. (2020). Veltri, Stefania ; Phan, Hotanphat ; de Luca, Francesco.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:29:y:2020:i:6:p:2226-2237.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. An empirical assessment of proposed solutions for resolving scale problems in value relevance accounting research. (2020). Gonzalez-Perez, Maria T. ; Garcia, Juan Manuel ; Martinez, Juana Aledo ; Grambovas, Christos A.
    In: Accounting and Finance.
    RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:60:y:2020:i:4:p:3905-3933.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The Value Relevance of Corporate Social Responsibility Expenditure: Evidence from Regulatory Decisions. (2020). Bose, Sudipta ; Abeysekera, Indra ; Saha, Amitav.
    In: Abacus.
    RePEc:bla:abacus:v:56:y:2020:i:4:p:455-494.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Do Investors Perceive Marking-to-Model as Marking-to-Myth? Early Evidence from FAS 157 Disclosure. (2019). Kolev, Kalin S.
    In: Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF).
    RePEc:wsi:qjfxxx:v:09:y:2019:i:02:n:s2010139219500058.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. The impact of environmental, social, and governance performance on stock prices: Evidence from the banking industry. (2019). Miralles Quirós, José ; Mirallesquiros, Maria Mar ; Hernandez, Jesus Redondo.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:6:p:1446-1456.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. The Usefulness of Regulatory Capital for Investors’ Judgments in the Basel 3 Framework. (2018). Sforza, Vincenzo ; Cimini, Riccardo ; Mechelli, Alessandro ; Stefanoni, Alessandra.
    In: International Journal of Business and Management.
    RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:13:y:2018:i:6:p:72.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Are Firms that Contribute to Sustainable Development Valued by Investors?. (2017). Miralles Quirós, José ; del Mar, Maria ; Mirallesquiros, Jose Luis ; Arraiano, Irene Guia.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:24:y:2017:i:1:p:71-84.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. How should we estimate value-relevance models? Insights from European data. (2017). Vasilakis, Chrysovalantis ; Onali, Enrico ; Ginesti, Gianluca.
    In: The British Accounting Review.
    RePEc:eee:bracre:v:49:y:2017:i:5:p:460-473.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Sustainable Development, Sustainability Leadership and Firm Valuation: Differences across Europe. (2017). Miralles Quirós, José ; del Mar, Maria ; Miralles-Quiros, Jose Luis ; Arraiano, Irene Guia.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:26:y:2017:i:7:p:1014-1028.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The Value Relevance of Environmental Audits: Evidence from Japan. (2017). Lee, Ki-Hoon ; Yook, Keun-Hyo ; Song, Hakjoon ; Park, Bum-Jin.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:26:y:2017:i:5:p:609-625.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. IFRS Adoption, Legal Systems and the Voluntary Disclosure of Human Capital: Cross-country Evidence from the Banking Industry. (2016). Elbannan, Mohamed.
    In: Accounting and Finance Research.
    RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:5:y:2016:i:4:p:30.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. The value relevance of exploration and evaluation expenditures. (2015). Zhou, Teng ; Rankin, Michaela ; Birt, Jacqueline.
    In: Accounting Research Journal.
    RePEc:eme:arjpps:v:28:y:2015:i:3:p:228-250.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Do alternative methods of reporting non-controlling interests really matter?. (2013). .
    In: Australian Journal of Management.
    RePEc:sae:ausman:v:38:y:2013:i:1:p:7-30.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. The transition to IFRS and the value relevance of financial statements in Greece. (2012). Tsalavoutas, Ioannis ; Andre, Paul ; Evans, Lisa.
    In: The British Accounting Review.
    RePEc:eee:bracre:v:44:y:2012:i:4:p:262-277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Intangible assets and value relevance: Evidence from the Portuguese stock exchange. (2010). Craig, Russell ; Rodrigues, Lucia Lima ; Oliveira, Lidia.
    In: The British Accounting Review.
    RePEc:eee:bracre:v:42:y:2010:i:4:p:241-252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Discussion of Scale Effects in Capital Markets‐Based Accounting Research. (2009). Shen, Yun ; Jiang, Wei.
    In: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting.
    RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:36:y:2009:i:3-4:p:289-296.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 18:57:10 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.