Barth M.E.; Clinch G. Scale effects in capital markets-based accounting research. J. Bus. Financ. Account. 2009, 36, 253-288.
Barth M.E.; Kallapur S. The Effects of Cross-Sectional Scale Differences on Regression Results in Empirical Accounting Research. Contemp. Account. Res. 1996, 13, 527-567.
Barth M.E.; McNichols M.F. Estimation and market valuation of environmental liabilities relating to superfund sites. J. Account. Res. 1994, 32, 177-209.
Chapple L.; Clarkson P.M.; Gold D.L. The cost of carbon: Capital market effects of the proposed emission trading scheme (ETS). Abacus 2013, 49, 1-33.
Cho C.H.; Patten D.M. The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Account. Organ. Soc. 2007, 32, 639-647.
- Clarkson P.M.; Li Y.; Richardson G.D. The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies. Account. Rev. 2004, 79, 329-353.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Clemens B.; Bakstran L.; Hamakawa C. Reliable categories of environmental policies. Int. J. Sustain. Strateg. Manag. 2010, 2, 234-255.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Connors E.; Johnston H.H.; Gao L.S. The informational value of Toxics Release Inventory performance. Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J. 2013, 4, 32-55.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cormier D.; Magnan M. Investors’ assessment of implicit environmental liabilities: An empirical investigation. J. Account. Public Policy 1997, 16, 215-241.
Dixon-Fowler H.R.; Slater D.J.; Johnson J.L.; Ellstrand A.E.; Romi A.M. Beyond “does it pay to be green?†A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP–CFP relationship. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 112, 353-3366.
Dowell G.; Hart S.; Yeung B. Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value?. Manag. Sci. 2000, 46, 1059-1074.
Easton P.D.; Sommers G.A. Scale and the Scale Effect in Market-based Accounting Research. J. Bus. Financ. Account. 2003, 30, 25-56.
- Edwards J.R. Construct validation in organizational behavior research. Organizational Behavior: A Management Challenge; Psychology Press: Hove, UK, 2003.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Etzion D. Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. J. Manag. 2007, 33, 637-664.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fabrigar L.R.; Wegener D.T.; MacCallum R.C.; Strahan E.J. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol. Methods 1999, 4, 272.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gil-Alana L.A.; Iniguez-Sanchez R.; López-Espinosa G. Endogenous problems in cross-sectional valuation models based on accounting information. Rev. Quant. Financ. Account. 2011, 37, 245-265.
Granger C.W. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econom. J. Econom. Soc. 1969, 424-438.
- Gray R.; Kouhy R.; Lavers S. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Account. Audit. Account. J. 1995, 8, 47-77.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hart S.L.; Ahuja G. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 1996, 5, 30-37.
- Hughes K. The value relevance of nonfinancial measures of air pollution in the electric utility industry. Account. Rev. 2000, 75, 209-228.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hunter J.E.; Schmidt F.L. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings; Sage: London, UK, 2004.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- ISO 14031: 2013. Environmental Performance Evaluation–Guidelines; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jiang C.; Fu Q. A Win-Win Outcome between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Value: From the Perspective of Stakeholders. Sustainability 2019, 11.
Jo H.; Kim H.; Park K. Corporate environmental responsibility and firm performance in the financial services sector. J. Bus. Ethics 2015, 131, 257-284.
Johnston D.M.; Sefcik S.E.; Soderstrom N.S. The value relevance of greenhouse gas emissions allowances: An exploratory study in the related United States SO2 market. Eur. Account. Rev. 2008, 17, 747-764.
Kim H.; Park K.; Ryu D. Corporate Environmental Responsibility: A Legal Origins Perspective. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 140, 381-402.
Konar S.; Cohen M.A. Information as regulation: The effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1997, 32, 109-124.
- Larcker D.F.; Richardson S.A.; Tuna I. Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. Account. Rev. 2007, 82, 963-1008.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lennox C.S.; Francis J.R.; Wang Z. Selection models in accounting research. Account. Rev. 2011, 87, 589-616.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Matsumura E.M.; Prakash R. Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions and Carbon Disclosures. Account. Rev. 2014, 89, 695-724.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
McWilliams A.; Siegel D. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?. Strateg. Manag. J. 2000, 21, 603-609.
- Miralles-Quirós M.; Miralles-Quirós J.; Gonçalves L. The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance performance: The Brazilian Case. Sustainability 2018, 10.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ohlson J.A. Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemp. Account. Res. 1995, 11, 661-687.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rahman N.; Post C. Measurement issues in environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR): Toward a transparent, reliable, and construct valid instrument. J. Bus. Ethics 2012, 105, 307-319.
Reverte C. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market valuation: Evidence from Spanish listed firms. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2016, 10, 411-435.
- Song M.K.; Lin F.C.; Ward S.E.; Fine J.P. Composite variables: When and how. Nurs. Res. 2013, 62, 45-49.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sutopo B.; Kot S.; Adiati A.; Ardila L. Sustainability Reporting and Value Relevance of Financial Statements. Sustainability 2018, 10.
- The Revised Plan of the National Roadmap for Greenhouse Gas Reductions by 2030 and the Plan for the National Greenhouse Gas Emission Permit Allocation from 2018 to 2020 are Finalized.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Trumpp C.; Endrikat J.; Zopf C.; Guenther E. Definition, conceptualization, and measurement of corporate environmental performance: A critical examination of a multidimensional construct. J. Bus. Ethics 2015, 126, 185-204.
Trumpp C.; Guenther T. Too little or too much? Exploring U-shaped relationships between corporate environmental performance and corporate financial performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2017, 26, 49-68.
- Wong C.S.; Law K.S.; Huang G.H. On the importance of conducting construct-level analysis for multidimensional constructs in theory development and testing. J. Manag. 2008, 34, 744-764.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Xie S.; Hayase K. Corporate environmental performance evaluation: A measurement model and a new concept. Bus. Strategye Environ. 2007, 16, 148-168.
Ziegler A.; Busch T.; Hoffmann V.H. Disclosed corporate responses to climate change and stock performance: An international empirical analysis. Energy Econ. 2011, 33, 1283-1294.
Ziliak S.T.; McCloskey D.N. Size matters: The standard error of regressions in the American Economic Review. J. Socio Econ. 2004, 33, 527-546.