Acciaro, M.; Vanelslander, T.; Sys, C.; Ferrari, C.; Roumboutsos, A.; Giuliano, G.; Kapros, S. Environmental sustainability in seaports: A framework for successful innovation. Marit. Policy Manag. 2014, 41, 480–500. [CrossRef]
- Aregall, M.G.; Bergqvist, R.; Monios, J. A global review of the hinterland dimension of green port strategies. Transp. Res. Part D-Transp. Environ. 2018, 59, 23–34. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ballini, F.; Bozzo, R. Air pollution from ships in ports: The socio-economic benefit of cold-ironing technology. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2015, 17, 92–98. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Barnes-Dabban, H.; van Tatenhove, J.P.; van Koppen, K.C.; Termeer, K.J. Institutionalizing environmental reform with sense-making: West and Central Africa ports and the ‘green port’ phenomenon. Mar. Policy 2017, 86, 111–120. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bergqvist, R.; Egelszandén, N. Green port dues—The case of hinterland transport. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2012, 5, 85–91. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chang, Y.T.; Park, H.K.; Lee, S.; Kim, E. Have emission control areas (ecas) harmed port efficiency in europe? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2018, 58, 39–53. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chen, J.; Huang, T.; Xie, X.; Lee, P.T.W.; Hua, C. Constructing Governance Framework of a Green and Smart Port. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 83. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chen, J.; Zheng, T.; Garg, A.; Xu, L.; Li, S.; Fei, Y. Alternative Maritime Power application as a green port strategy: Barriers in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 213, 825–837. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chiu, R.H.; Lin, L.H.; Ting, S.C. Evaluation of green port factors and performance: A fuzzy AHP analysis. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014, 12, 1–12. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Csercsik, D.; Hubert, F.; Sziklai, B.R.; Kóczy, L.. Modeling transfer profits as externalities in a cooperative game-theoretic model of natural gas networks. Energy Econ. 2019, 80, 355–365. [CrossRef]
Daamen, T.A.; Vries, I. Governing the European port–city interface: Institutional impacts on spatial projects between city and port. J. Transp. Geogr. 2013, 27, 4–13. [CrossRef]
- Fan, K.; Hui, E.C.M. Evolutionary game theory analysis for understanding the decision-making mechanisms of governments and developers on green building incentives. Build. Environ. 2020, 179, 106972. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2020, 12, 8072 25 of 25
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Friedman, D. Evolutionary Games in Economics. Econometrica 1991, 59, 637–666. [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Shen, J.; He, W.; Sun, F.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, W.; Zhang, X.; Kong, Y. An evolutionary game analysis of governments’ decision-making behaviors and factors influencing watershed ecological compensation in china. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 251, 109592. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Homsombat, W.; Yip, T.L.; Yang, H.; Fu, X. Regional cooperation and management of port pollution. Marit. Policy Manag. 2013, 40, 451–466. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2020, 12, 8072 24 of 25
- Jiang, B.; Wang, X.; Xue, H.; Li, J.; Gong, Y. An evolutionary game model analysis on emission control areas in China. Mar. Policy 2020, 118, 104010. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kaysi, I.; Nehme, N. Optimal investment strategy in a container terminal: A game theoretic approach. Marit. Econ. Logist. 2016, 18, 250–263. [CrossRef]
- Khanizad, R.; Montazer, G. Participation against competition in banking markets based on cooperative game theory. J. Financ. Data Sci. 2018, 4, 16–28. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lam, J.S.; Li, K.X. Green port marketing for sustainable growth and development. Transp. Policy 2019, 84, 73–81. [CrossRef]
Lam, J.S.; Notteboom, T. The greening of ports: A comparison of port management tools used by leading ports in Asia and Europe. Transp. Rev. 2014, 34, 169–189. [CrossRef]
Lee, T.; Yeo, G.T.; Thai, V.V. Environmental efficiency analysis of port cities: Slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis approach. Transp. Policy 2014, 33, 82–88. [CrossRef]
- Luna, G.M.; Manini, E.; Turk, V.; Tinta, T.; D’Errico, G.; Baldrighi, E.; Baljak, V.; Buda, D.; Cabrini, M.; Campanelli, A.; et al. Status of faecal pollution in ports: A basin-wide investigation in the Adriatic Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 147, 219–228. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- lvarez, X.; Gómez-Rúa, M.; Vidal-Puga, J. River flooding risk prevention: A cooperative game theory approach. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 248, 109284. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mcarthur, D.P.; Osland, L. Ships in a city harbour: An economic valuation of atmospheric emissions. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2013, 21, 7–52. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ministry of Transportation of China. The Letter of the General Office of the Ministry of Transport on Soliciting Opinions on the Action Plan for Further Promoting the Construction of Green Port (2018–2022); Gbsh: Beijing, China, 2018; No. 480.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mjelde, A.; Endresen, Ø.; Bjørshol, E.; Gierløff, C.W.; Husby, E.; Solheim, J.; Mjøs, N.; Eide, M.S. Differentiating on port fees to accelerate the green maritime transition. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 149, 110561. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nielsen, I.E.; Majumder, S.; Sana, S.S.; Saha, S. Comparative analysis of government incentives and game structures on single and two-period green supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 1371–1398. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Poulsen, R.T.; Ponte, S.; Sornn-Friese, H. Environmental upgrading in global value chains: The potential and limitations of ports in the greening of maritime transport. Geoforum 2018, 89, 83–95. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Puig, M.; Wooldridge, C.; Michail, A.; Darbra, R.M. Current status and trends of the environmental performance in European ports. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 48, 57–66. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Radwan, M.E.; Chen, J.; Wan, Z.; Zheng, T.; Hua, C.; Huang, X. Critical barriers to the introduction of shore power supply for green port development: Case of Djibouti container terminals. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2019, 21, 1293–1306. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Saeed, N.; Larsen, O.I. Container terminal concessions: A game theory application to the case of the ports of Pakistan. Marit. Econ. Logist. 2010, 12, 237–262. [CrossRef]
- Schipper, C.A.; Vreugdenhil, H.; DeJong, M.P. A sustainability assessment of ports and port-city plans: Comparing ambitions with achievements. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2017, 57, 84–111. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
SeguÃÂ, X.; Puig, M.; Quintieri, E.; Wooldridge, C.; Darbra, R.M. New environmental performance baseline for inland ports: A benchmark for the European inland port sector. Environ. Sci. Policy 2016, 58, 29–40. [CrossRef]
Song, D.P.; Lyons, A.; Li, D.; Sharifi, H. Modeling port competition from a transport chain perspective. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2016, 87, 75–96. [CrossRef]
- State Council of China. Notice of the State Council on Printing and Distributing the Development Plan of Modern Comprehensive Transportation System During the 13th Five Year Plan; GF: Beijing, China, 2017; No. 11.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Talley, W.K.; Ng, M.W. Port economic cost functions: A service perspective. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2016, 88, 1–10. [CrossRef]
- Teerawattana, R.; Yang, Y.C. Environmental performance indicators for green port policy evaluation: Case study of laem chabang port. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 2019, 35, 63–69. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tseng, P.; Pilcher, N. Evaluating the key factors of green port policies in Taiwan through quantitative and qualitative approaches. Transp. Policy 2019, 82, 127–137. [CrossRef]
- Vejvar, M.; Lai, K.; Lo, C.K.Y.; Fürst, E.W. Strategic responses to institutional forces pressuring sustainability practice adoption: Case-based evidence from inland port operations. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2018, 61, 274–288. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wan, C.; Zhang, D.; Yan, X.; Yang, Z. A novel model for the quantitative evaluation of green port development–A case study of major ports in China. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2018, 61, 431–443. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wan, X.L.; Qie, X.Q. Poverty alleviation ecosystem evolutionary game on smart supply chain platform under the government financial platform incentive mechanism. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2020, 372, 112595. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Woo, J.K.; Moon, D.S.; Lam, J.S. The impact of environmental policy on ports and the associated economic opportunities. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2018, 110, 234–242. [CrossRef]
Xi, X.; Zhang, J. Complexity analysis of a decision-making game concerning governments and heterogeneous agricultural enterprises with bounded rationality. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2020, 140, 110220. [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Cai, Y.; Wei, Y.; Huang, S. Choice of technology for emission control in port areas: A supply chain perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 240, 82–88. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Yang, Y.C.; Chang, W.M. Impacts of electric rubber-tired gantries on green port performance. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2013, 8, 67–76. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Yang, Y.C.; Chen, S.L. Determinants of global logistics hub ports: Comparison of the port development policies of Taiwan, Korea, and Japan. Transp. Policy 2016, 45, 179–189. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Li, H.; Xue, L.; Wang, W. Using three-sided dynamic game model to study regional cooperative governance of haze pollution in China from a government heterogeneity perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 12, 694. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Zhang, N.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y. The behavior mechanism of the urban joint distribution alliance under government supervision from the perspective of sustainable development. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6232. [CrossRef] 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).