create a website

Towards a Sustainable Society through Emerging Mobility Services: A Case of Autonomous Buses. (2020). Chun, Yoon-Young ; Sun, Yang ; Matsumoto, Mitsutaka ; Chinen, Kenichiro.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9170-:d:439940.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 85

References cited by this document

Cocites: 26

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abe R. Introducing autonomous buses and taxis: Quantifying the potential benefits in Japanese transportation systems. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2019, 126, 94-113.

  2. Abraham H.; Lee C.; Brady S.; Fitzgerald C.; Mehler B.; Reimer B.; Coughlin J.F. Autonomous Vehicles, Trust, and Driving Alternatives: A Survey of Consumer Preferences; Massachusetts Institute Technology, AgeLab: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 1-16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Acheampong R.A.; Thomoupolos N.; Marten K.; Beyazıt E.; Cugurullo F.; Dusparic I. Literature review on the social challenges of autonomous transport. STSM Report for COST Action CA16222 Wider Impacts and Scenario Evaluation of Autonomous and Connected Transport (WISE-ACT); Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin: Dublin, Ireland, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Ajzen I.; Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour; Printice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1980.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Alessandrini A.; Mercier-Handisyde P. CityMobil2-Experience and Recommendations. 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Alphabet’s Self-Driving Car Project Waymo is Shuttering its Austin Operations. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Anable J. “Complacent Car Addicts” or “Aspiring Environmentalists”? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transp. Policy 2005, 23, 65-78.

  8. Anania E.C.; Rice S.; Winter S.R.; Milner M.N.; Walters N.W.; Pierce M. Why people are not willing to let their children ride in driverless school buses: A gender and nationality comparison. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7.

  9. Anderson J.C.; Gerbing D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 29, 411-423.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Capability. 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Bagozzi R.P.; Yi Y.; Phillips L.W. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Adm. Sci. Q. 1991, 36, 421.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Bansal P.; Kockelman K.M.; Singh A. Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2016, 67, 1-14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Barbarossa C.; Beckmann S.C.; De Pelsmacker P.; Moons I.; Gwozdz W. A self-identity based model of electric car adoption intention: A cross-cultural comparative study. J. Environ. Psychol. 2015, 42, 149-160.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Bazilinskyy P.; Kyriakidis M.; de Winter J. An international crowdsourcing study into people’s statements on fully automated driving. Procedia Manuf. 2015, 3, 2534-2542.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Bonneau V.; Yi H.; Probst L.; Pedersen B.; Lonkeu O.K. Autonomous Cars: A Big Opportunity for European Industry. Digital Transformation Monitor (European Commission). 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Campus Automated Shuttle Service Deployment Initiative. 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Canals L.; Martinez-Laserna E.; Garcia B.A.; Nieto N. Sustainability analysis of the electric vehicle use in Europe for CO2 emissions reduction. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 127, 425-437.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Chin W.W. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. Methodology for Business and Management. Modern Methods for Business Research; Marcoulides G.A. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1998; pp. 295-336.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Chinese 5G Self-Driving Bus Offers Glimpse of Commutes to Come. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Choi J.; Lee A.; Ok C. The effects of consumers’ perceived risk and benefit on attitude and behavioral intention: A study of street food. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2013, 30, 222-237.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Chun Y.-Y.; Matsumoto M.; Tahara K.; Chinen K.; Endo H. Exploring factors affecting car sharing use intention in the Southeast-Asia region: A case study in Java, Indonesia. Sustainability 2019, 11.

  22. Cregger J.; Dawes M.; Fischer S.; Lowenthal C.; Machek E.; Perlman D. Low-Speed Automated Shuttles: State of the Practice Final Report. U.S. Department of Transportation. 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. D’Aveni R.A. Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1994, 21, 291-294.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Daziano R.A.; Sarrias M.; Leard B. Are consumers willing to pay to let cars drive for them? Analyzing response to autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2017, 78, 150-164.

  25. De Boeck J. Why self-driving cars might never become a commodity. Forbes Technol. Counc. 2020, 30.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Dong X.; DiScenna M.; Guerra E. Transit user perceptions of driverless buses. Transportation 2019, 46, 35-50.

  27. Dual Motor Model S and Autopilot. The Tesla Team. 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Falk R.; Miller N. A Primer Soft Modeling; University of Akron Press: Akron, OH, USA, 1992.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Fast Facts U.S. Transportation Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Fornell C.; Larcker D. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39-50.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Fraedrich E.; Beiker S.; Lenz B. Transition pathways to fully automated driving and its implications for the sociotechnical system of automobility. Eur. J. Futures Res. 2015, 3, 1-11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Fraszczyk A.; Mulley C. Public perception of and attitude to driverless train: A case study of Sydney, Australia. Urban Rail Transit 2017, 3, 100-111.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Fuller B. Cautious optimism about driverless cars and land use in American metropolitan areas. J. Policy Dev. Res. 2016, 18, 181-184.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Global Autonomous Vehicle Report. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Godoy J.; Pérez J.; Onieva E.; Villagra J.; Milanés V.; Haber R. A driverless vehicle demonstration on motorways and in urban environments. Transport 2015, 30, 253-263.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Hardman S.; Berliner R.; Tal G. Who will be the early adopters of automated vehicles? Insights from a survey of electric vehicle owners in the United States. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2019, 71, 248-264.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Hawkins A.J. Driverless Taxi. 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Henrichs R.B. Factors that Impact Consumer Adoption of Innovative Technological Services Over Time: The Case of Internet. Ph.D. Thesis; Golden Gate University: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1995.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Herrenkind B.; Brendel A.B.; Nastjuk I.; Greve M.; Kolbe L.M. Investigating end-user acceptance of autonomous electric buses to accelerate diffusion. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2019, 74, 255-278.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Hohenberger C.; Spörrle M.; Welpe I.M. How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pr. 2016, 94, 374-385.

  41. Hulse L.M.; Xie H.; Galea E.R. Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Saf. Sci. 2018, 102, 1-13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Jöreskog K.G. How Large Can a Standardized Coefficient Be. 1999.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Kaur K.; Rampersad G. Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2018, 48, 87-96.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Kessler A. Self-driving cars roll up slowly. Wall Str. J. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  45. Kim J.; Schmucker J.-D.; Bergstad C.J.; Fujii S.; Garling T. The influence of personality on acceptability of sustainable transport policies. Transportation 2014, 41, 855-872.

  46. Kyriadkidis M.; Happee R.; de Winter J.C. Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2015, 32, 127-140.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Lavasani M.; Jin X.; Du Y. Market penetration model for autonomous vehicles on the basis of earlier technology adoption experience. Transp. Res. Rec. 2016, 2597, 67-74.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Litman T. Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions; Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Litman T. Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions: Implications for Transport Planning; Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Loewenstein G.F.; Weber E.U.; Hsee C.K.; Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychol. Bull. 2001, 127, 267-286.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Lombardo C. Uber CEO Says Self-Driving Cars Are ‘Student Drivers’; Company suspended its self-driving-car program after a fatal crash in March. Wall Str. J. 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Madigan R.; Louw T.; Dziennus M.; Graindorge T.; Ortega E.; Graindorge M.; Merat N. Acceptance of automated road transport systems (ARTS): An adaptation of the UTAUT model. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 2217-2226.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Madigan R.; Louw T.; Wilbrink M.; Schieben A.; Merat N. What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2017, 50, 55-64.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Many Americans Remain Afraid of Fully Self-Driving Vehicles. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Matsumoto M.; Chinen K.; Endo H. Paving the way for sstainable remanufacturing in Southeast Asia: An analysis of auto parts markets. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 205, 1029-1041.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Merlin L.A. Comparing automated shared taxis and conventional bus transit for a small city. J. Public Transp. 2017, 20, 19-39.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Miller S.A.; Heard B.R. The environmental impact of autonomous vehicles depends on adoption patterns. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 6119-6121.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  58. Miralles-Guasch C.; Domene E. Sustainable transport challenges in a suburban university: The case of the autonomous university of Barcelona. Transp. Policy 2010, 17, 454-463.

  59. Morrow W.R.; Greenblatt J.B.; Sturges A.; Saxena S.; Gopal A.; Millstein D.; Shah N.; Gilmore E.A. Key factors influencing autonomous vehicles’ energy and environmental outcome. Road Vehicle Automation. Lecture Notes in Mobility; Meyer G.; Beiker S. Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 127-135.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Morton C.; Anable J.; Nelson J.D. Assessing the importance of car meanings and attitudes in consumer evaluations of electric vehicles. Energy Effic. 2016, 9, 495-509.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Nordhoff S.; de Winter J.; Madigan R.; Merat N.; van Arem B.; Happee R. User acceptance of automated shuttles in Berlin-Schöneberg: A questionnaire study. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2018, 58, 843-854.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Nordhoff S.; Van Arem B.; Happee R. Conceptual model to explain, predict, and improve user acceptance of driverless podlike vhicles. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2016, 2602, 60-67.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Park E.; Kim K.J.; Kwon S.J. Understanding the emergence of wearable devices as next-generation tools for health communication. Inf. Technol. People 2016, 29, 717-732.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Penmesta P.; Adanu E.K.; Wood D.; Wang T.; Jones S.L. Perceptions and expectations of autonomous vehicles—A snapshot of vulnerable road user opinion. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 143, 9-13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Piao J.; McDonald M.; Hounsell N.; Graindorge M.; Graindorge T.; Malhen N. Public views towards implementation of automated vehicles in urban areas. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 2168-2177.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Pil F.K.; Cohen S.K. Modularity: Implications for imitation, innovation, and sustained advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2006, 31, 995-1011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Portouli E.; Karaseitanidis G.; Lytrivis P.; Amditis A.; Raptis O.; Karaberi C. Public attitudes towards autonomous mini buses operating in real conditions in a Hellenic city. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV); Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Los Angeles, CA, USA, 11–14 June 2017, ; pp. 571-576.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Pressman A. Sony won CES with a car no one will ever drive. Fortune 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Releases Policy on Automated Vehicle Development. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Ring T. Connected cars–the next target for hackers. Netw. Secur. 2015, 11, 11-16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Rogers E.E. Diffusion of Innovations; The Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Ruggeri K.; Kácha O.; Menezes I.; Kos M.; Franklin M.; Parma L.; Langdon P.; Matthews B.; Miles J. In with the new? Generational differences shape population technology adoption patterns in the age of self-driving vehicles. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2018, 50, 39-44. Telefonica, Index on Digital Life.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  73. Schuitema G.; Steg L.; Forward S. Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2010, 44, 99-109.

  74. Shariff A.; Bonnefon J.F.; Rahwan I. Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving vehicles. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2017, 1, 694-696.

  75. Simonite T. Prepare to be underwhelmed by 2021’s autonomous cars. MIT Technol. Rev. 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Solbraa Bay A.J.T. Innovation Adoption in Robotics: Consumer Intentions to Use Autonomous Vehicles. Master’s Thesis; Norwegian School of Economics: Bergen, Norway, 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Stevens P.M.; Williams K.P.; Smith M.C. Organizational communication and information process in an Internet-enabled environment. Psychol. Mark. 2000, 17, 607-632.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Svensson L.; Eriksson J. Tuning for Ride Quality in Autonomous Vehicle: Application to Linear Quadratic Path Planning Algorithm. Ph.D. Thesis; Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden, 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Taber K.S. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res. Sci. Educ. 2018, 48, 1273-1296.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Thomopoulos N.; Givoni M. The autonomous car—A blessing or a curse for the future of low carbon mobility? An exploration of likely vs. desirable outcomes. Eur. J. Futures Res. 2015, 3, 1-14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Three in Four Americans Remain Afraid of Fully Self-Driving Vehicles. Newsroom. 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Van Arem B.; Van Driel C.J.G.; Visser R. The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2006, 7, 429-436.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Venkatesh V.; Morris M.G.; Davis G.B.; Davis F.D. User acceptance of information tehcnology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425-478.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Wintersberger S.; Azmat M.; Kummer S. Are we ready to ride autonomous vehicles? A pilot study on Austrian consumers’ perspective. Logistics 2019, 3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Xu Z.; Zhang K.; Min H.; Wang Z.; Zhao X.; Liu P. What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2018, 95, 320-334.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Introducing the vehicle-infrastructure cooperative control system by quantifying the benefits for the scenario of signalized intersections. (2025). Wang, Xianing ; Lu, Linjun ; Zhang, Zhan ; Li, Haoming.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000060.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Competitive advantage of car-sharing based on travel costs comparison model: A case study of Beijing, China. (2024). Li, Zixun ; Sun, Yue ; Zhang, Yanli ; Dong, Xianlei ; Hu, Beibei.
    In: Research in Transportation Economics.
    RePEc:eee:retrec:v:103:y:2024:i:c:s0739885924000027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. A Taxonomy for Autonomous Vehicles Considering Ambient Road Infrastructure. (2023). Huang, Zilin ; Chen, Yanshen ; Zong, Shuya ; Labi, Samuel.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11258-:d:1197660.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Resourcing idle privately owned autonomous electric vehicles: System design and simulation for ride-sharing in residential areas of the aging in Japan. (2023). Zhou, Yefang ; Yamamoto, Toshiyuki ; Sato, Hitomi.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:143:y:2023:i:c:p:46-57.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Diffusion of connected and autonomous vehicles concerning mode choice, policy interventions and sustainability impacts: A system dynamics modelling study. (2023). Jiang, Like ; Chen, Haibo ; Paschalidis, Evangelos.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:141:y:2023:i:c:p:274-290.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Fixed routing or demand-responsive? Agent-based modelling of autonomous first and last mile services in light-rail systems. (2023). Clausen, Sofus Rasmus ; Seshadri, Ravi ; Rich, Jeppe ; Jomeh, Ali Jamal.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:173:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423000964.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Small and medium-sized taxi firm operators stated choices of future business models: A case study in Japan based on hybrid choice model with panel effects. (2023). Zhang, Junyi ; Yamamoto, Jenny ; Namgung, Hyewon ; Fujiwara, Akimasa.
    In: Research in Transportation Economics.
    RePEc:eee:retrec:v:101:y:2023:i:c:s0739885923000811.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Mode boundaries of automated metro and semi-rapid rail in urban transit. (2022). Moccia, Luigi ; Laporte, Gilbert ; Allen, Duncan W ; Spinosa, Andrea.
    In: Public Transport.
    RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:14:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s12469-021-00287-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Moving toward a More Sustainable Autonomous Mobility, Case of Heterogeneity in Preferences. (2022). Abbasi, Mohammadhossein ; Farzin, Iman ; Ciari, Francesco ; MacIoszek, Elbieta ; Mamdoohi, Amir Reza.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:460-:d:1016890.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. A Microsimulation Modelling Approach to Quantify Environmental Footprint of Autonomous Buses. (2022). Hasan, Umair ; Aljassmi, Hamad ; Whyte, Andrew.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15657-:d:983258.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Walking in the Era of Autonomous Vehicles. (2022). Farrar, Victoria ; Pettigrew, Simone ; Booth, Leon ; Brown, Julie ; Thompson, Jason ; Karl, Charles ; Godic, Branislava.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10509-:d:895763.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Evaluation of a Reputation Management Technique for Autonomous Vehicles. (2022). Uppalapati, Suraj ; Straub, Jeremy ; Kianersi, Darius ; Bansal, Anirudh.
    In: Future Internet.
    RePEc:gam:jftint:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:31-:d:728025.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Willingness to Buy and/or Pay Disparity: Evidence from Fully Autonomous Vehicles. (2021). Managi, Shunsuke ; Kawabata, Yuta ; Yoo, Sunbin ; Kumagai, Junya ; Keeley, Alexander.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:108882.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Autonomous and conventional bus fleet optimization for fixed-route operations considering demand uncertainty. (2021). Lin, Yun Hui ; Tian, Qingyun.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:48:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s11116-020-10146-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Implications of Autonomous Vehicles for Accessibility and Transport Equity: A Framework Based on Literature. (2021). Hauger, Georg ; Ravazzoli, Elisa ; Dianin, Alberto.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4448-:d:537144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Operational benefits of autonomous vessels in logistics—A case of autonomous water-taxis in Bergen. (2021). Wallace, Stein ; Gu, Yewen.
    In: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.
    RePEc:eee:transe:v:154:y:2021:i:c:s1366554521002209.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Design and operation of feeder systems in the era of automated and electric buses. (2021). Jenelius, Erik ; Badia, Hugo.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:152:y:2021:i:c:p:146-172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. A review of public transport economics. (2021). Horcher, Daniel ; Tirachini, Alejandro.
    In: Economics of Transportation.
    RePEc:eee:ecotra:v:25:y:2021:i:c:s2212012221000010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. An Experimental Approach to Understanding the Impacts of Monitoring Methods on Use Intentions for Autonomous Vehicle Services: Survey Evidence from Japan. (2020). Fukuda, Daisuke ; Kita, Yusuke ; Abe, Ryosuke.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2157-:d:331075.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Towards a Sustainable Society through Emerging Mobility Services: A Case of Autonomous Buses. (2020). Chun, Yoon-Young ; Sun, Yang ; Matsumoto, Mitsutaka ; Chinen, Kenichiro.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9170-:d:439940.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Costs and Benefits of Electrifying and Automating Bus Transit Fleets. (2020). Quarles, Neil ; Mohamed, Moataz ; Kockelman, Kara M.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:3977-:d:357303.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Willingness to ride and perceptions of autonomous public transit. (2020). Kotval-Karamchandani, Zeenat ; Cai, Meng ; Kassens-Noor, Eva.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:138:y:2020:i:c:p:92-104.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Transitioning towards the deployment of line-based autonomous buses: Consequences for service frequency and vehicle capacity. (2020). Jenelius, Erik ; Cats, Oded ; Hatzenbuhler, Jonas.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:138:y:2020:i:c:p:491-507.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The economics of automated public transport: Effects on operator cost, travel time, fare and subsidy. (2020). Antoniou, Constantinos ; Tirachini, Alejandro.
    In: Economics of Transportation.
    RePEc:eee:ecotra:v:21:y:2020:i:c:s2212012219300802.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Choice Behavior of Autonomous Vehicles Based on Logistic Models. (2019). Xu, Xuecai ; Tan, Limin ; Ma, Changxi.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:54-:d:299817.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The Driverless Bus: An Analysis of Public Perceptions and Acceptability. (2019). Lopez-Lambas, Eugenia M ; Alonso, Andrea.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4986-:d:266599.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-20 20:19:25 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.