create a website

Sustainability of Business through Project Risk Identification with Use of Expert Estimates. (2021). Brutovsky, Michal ; Luskova, Maria ; Buganova, Katarina ; Kubas, Jozef ; Slepecky, Jaroslav.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6311-:d:567707.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 88

References cited by this document

Cocites: 43

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Risk assessment in the enterprise management system. (2023). Peter, Kardo ; Katarna, Mkk ; Mria, Hudkov.
    In: WSB Journal of Business and Finance.
    RePEc:vrs:wsbjbf:v:57:y:2023:i:1:p:46-52:n:1006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Almendra-Arao F.; Sotres-Ramos D.; Zuñiga-Estrada M. Extending the Barnard’s test to non-inferiority. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 2015, 46, 6293-6302.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Alvand A.; Mirhosseini S.M.; Ehsanifar M.; Zeighami E.; Mohammadi A. Identification and assessment of risk in construction projects using the integrated FMEA-SWARA-WASPAS model under fuzzy environment: A case study of a construction project in Iran. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2021, 1-23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. An J.; Mikhaylov A. Russian energy projects in South Africa. J. Energy S. Afr. 2020, 31, 58-64.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. An J.; Mikhaylov A.; Richter U.H. Trade war effects: Evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05693.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Andersen E.S.; Vaagaasar A.L. Project management improvement efforts—Creating project management value by uniqueness or mainstream thinking?. Proj. Manag. J. 2009, 40, 19-27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Asadabadi M.R.; Zwikael O. Integrating risk into estimations of project activities’ time and cost: A stratified approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2021, 291, 482-490.

  7. Atkinson R.; Crawford L.; Ward S. Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2006, 24, 687-698.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Aven T. Practical implications of the new risk perspectives. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2013, 115, 136-145.

  9. Awodi N.J.; Liu Y.-K.; Ayodeji A.; Adibeli J.O. Expert judgement-based risk factor identification and analysis for an effective nuclear decommissioning risk assessment modeling. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2021, 136, 103733.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Barraza G.A. Probabilistic estimation and allocation of project time contingency. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2011, 137, 259-265.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Bierc G.J. Risk management infrastructure can boost corporate performance. Financ. Exec. 2003, 19, 59-61.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Brady T.; Davies A. Managing structural and dynamic complexity: A story of two projects. Proj. Manag. J. 2014, 45, 21-38.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Brimkkemper S.; Lyytinen K.; Welke R. Method Engineering: Principles of Method Construction and Tool Support; Academic Publishers: Atlanta, MA, USA, 1996.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Brownstein N.C.; Louis T.A.; O’Hagan A.; Pendergast J. The role of expert judgment in statistical inference and evidence-based decision-making. Am. Stat. 2019, 73, 56-68.

  15. Carfora A.; Scandurra G.; Thomas A. Determinants of environmental innovations supporting small- and medium-sized enterprises sustainable development. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2021.

  16. Chattapadhyay D.B.; Putta J.; P R.M.R. Risk identification, assessments, and prediction for mega construction projects: A risk prediction paradigm based on cross analytical-machine learning model. Buildings 2021, 11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Chen W.; Holden N.M. Social life cycle assessment of average Irish dairy farm. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2017, 22, 1459-1472.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Choudhry R.; Aslam M.A.; Hinze J.W.; Arain F.M. Cost and schedule risk analysis of bridge construction in Pakistan: Establishing risk guidelines. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2014, 140, 04014020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Colson A.R.; Cooke R.M. Expert elicitation: Using the classical model to validate experts’ judgments. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2018, 12, 113-132.

  20. De Palma A.; Picard N.; Andrieu L. Risk in transport investments. Netw. Spat. Econ. 2009, 12, 187-204.

  21. Deming W.E. Out of the Crisis; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1986.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Dimitriou H.T.; Ward E.J.; Wright P.G. Mega transport projects—Beyond the “Iron Triangle”: Findings from the OMEGA research programme. Prog. Plan. 2013, 86, 1-43.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Dvorský J.; Petráková Z.; Khan K.A.; Formánek I.; Mikoláš Z. Selected aspects of strategic management in the service sector. J. Tour. Serv. 2020, 11, 109-123.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Eskerod P.; Riis E. Project management models as value creators. Proj. Manag. J. 2009, 40, 4-18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Filippetto A.S.; Lima R.; Barbosa J.L.V. A risk prediction model for software project management based on similarity analysis of context histories. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2021, 131, 106497.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Folch-Calvo M.; Brocal-Fernández F.; González-Gaya C.; Sebastián M. Analysis and characterization of risk methodologies applied to industrial parks. Sustainability 2020, 12.

  27. Freeman M.; Beale P. Measuring project success. Proj. Manag. J. 1992, 23, 8-17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Fridgeirsson T.; Ingason H.; Jonasson H.; Kristjansdottir B. The VUCAlity of projects: A new approach to assess a project risk in a complex world. Sustainability 2021, 13.

  29. Giraldo A.L.P.; Nuñez M.A. Administración del riesgo estratégico en grandes empresas privadas de Colombia. AD Minist. 2020, 36, 67-96.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Greiman V.A. Megaproject Management: Lessons on Risk and Project Management from the Big Dig; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-1-118-41634-1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Holla K.; Moricova V. Specifics of monitoring and analysing emergencies in information systems. Proceedings of the 13th International Scientific Conference on Sustainable, Modern and Safe Transport, Stary Smokovec, Slovakia, 29–31 May 2019, ; pp. 1343-1348.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Hossen M.M.; Kang S.; Kim J. Construction schedule delay risk assessment by using combined AHP-RII methodology for an international NPP project. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2015, 47, 362-379.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Hubbard D.W. The Failure of Risk Management: Why It’s Broken and How to Fix It; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Hvolkova L.; Klement L.; Klementova V.; Kovalova M. Barriers hindering innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises. J. Compet. 2019, 11, 51-67.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. ISO Risk Management—Vocabulary; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. ISO Standards Are Internationally Agreed by Experts. 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Iyer K.C. Identification and Evaluation of Dispute-Prone Clauses in Indian Construction Contracts. Ph.D. Thesis; Indian Institute of Technology: Madras, India, 1996.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Jha K.N.; Iyer K. Critical determinants of project coordination. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2006, 24, 314-322.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Khurana S.; Haleem A.; Luthra S.; Mannan B. Evaluating critical factors to implement sustainable oriented innovation practices: An analysis of micro, small, and medium manufacturing enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 285, 125377.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Kucharcikova A.; Miciak M.; Malichova E.; Durisova M.; Tokarcikova E. The motivation of students at universities as a prerequisite of the education’s sustainability within the business value generation context. Sustainability 2019, 11.

  41. Lai F.W.; Azizan N.A.; Samad M.F.A. A strategic framework for value enhancing enterprise risk management. J. Glob. Bus. Econ. 2011, 2, 23-47.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Lehtiranta L. Risk perceptions and approaches in multi-organizations: A research review 2000–2012. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2014, 32, 640-653.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Li W.; Wang Y. Dynamic evaluation of logistics enterprise competitiveness based on machine learning and improved neural network. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2021, 1-15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Lima P.F.D.A.; Marcelino-Sadaba S.; Verbano C. Successful implementation of project risk management in small and medium enterprises: A cross-case analysis. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2021, 14, 1023-1045.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Lima P.F.D.A.; Verbano C. Project risk management implementation in SMEs: A case study from Italy. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2019, 14, 3-10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Liu J.; Du Z.; Ma L.; Liu C. Identification and assessment of subway construction risk: An integration of AHP and experts grading method. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021, 2021, 6661099.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Locatelli G.; Mikic M.; Kovacevic M.; Brookes N.; Ivanisevic N. The successful delivery of megaprojects: A novel research method. Proj. Manag. J. 2017, 48, 78-94.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Loisel S.; Takane Y. Partitions of Pearson’s Chi-square statistic for frequency tables: A comprehensive account. Comput. Stat. 2015, 31, 1429-1452.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  49. Lopatin E. Methodological approaches to research resource saving industrial enterprises. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2019, 9, 181-187.

  50. Mahmoud N.; Jensen A.L.; Topp C.; Sørensen C.; Nørremark M.; Eory V.; Hutchings N. A method to quantify the detailed risk of serious injury in agricultural production. Sustainability 2021, 13.

  51. Masár M.; Hudáková M.; Šimák L.; Brezina D. The current state of project risk management in the transport sector. Transp. Res. Procedia 2019, 40, 1119-1126.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Mengel T.; Cowan-Sahadath K.; Follert F. The Value of project management to organizations in Canada and Germany, or do values add value? Five case studies. Proj. Manag. J. 2009, 40, 28-41.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Merna T.; Al-thani F. Risk Management: Risk Management in the Company; Computer Press: Brno, Crech Republic, 2007; ISBN 978-80-251-1547-3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Meyer M.A.; Booker J.M. Eliciting and Analyzing Expert Judgment; SIAM Publications: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Mitasova V.; Soltes V. Education of professionals for the international crisis management tasks’ implementation. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Technology, Education and Development, Valencia, Spain, 6–8 March 2017, ; pp. 6624-6629.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Morgan M.G.; Henrion M. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Namazian A.; Yakhchali S.H.; Yousefi V.; Tamošaitienė J. Combining monte carlo simulation and bayesian networks methods for assessing completion time of projects under risk. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  58. Nesticò A.; He S.; De Mare G.; Benintendi R.; Maselli G. The ALARP principle in the cost-benefit analysis for the acceptability of investment risk. Sustainability 2018, 10.

  59. Nguyen P.T.; Pham C.P.; Phan P.T.; Vu N.B.; Duong M.T.H.; Nguyen Q.L.H.T.T. Exploring critical risk factors of office building projects. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 2021, 8, 309-315.

  60. Nunes M.; Abreu A. Managing open innovation project risks based on a social network analysis perspective. Sustainability 2020, 12.

  61. O’Hagan A. Expert knowledge elicitation: Subjective but scientific. Am. Stat. 2019, 73, 69-81.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Okudan O.; Budayan C.; Dikmen I. A knowledge-based risk management tool for construction projects using case-based reasoning. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 173, 114776.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Osuszek L.; Ledzianowski J. Decision support and risk management in business context. J. Decis. Syst. 2020, 1-12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  64. Polorecka M.; Kubas J.; Danihelka P.; Petrlova K.; Stofkova K.; Buganova K. Use of software on modeling hazardous substance release as a support tool for crisis management. Sustainability 2021, 13.

  65. Project Management Institute: Foundational Standards; PMI: Newtown Square, PA, USA, 2017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Report on the Results of the Survey 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Risk Management Guidelines; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Risk Management—Risk Assessment Techniques; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Ristvej J.; Sokolova L.; Starackova J.; Ondrejka R.; Lacinak M. Experiences with implementation of information systems within preparation to deal with crisis situations in terms of crisis management and building resilience in the Slovak Republic. Proceedings of the International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, Madrid, Spain, 23–26 October 2017, .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  70. Schulte J.; Villamil C.; Hallstedt S. Strategic sustainability risk management in product development companies: Key aspects and conceptual approach. Sustainability 2020, 12.

  71. Schwalbe K. Project Management in IT: A Complete Guide; Computer Press: Brno, Czech Republic, 2011; ISBN 978-80-251-2882-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Shan G.; Ma C.; Hutson A.D.; Wilding G.E. Randomized two-stage phase II clinical trial designs based on Barnard’s exact test. J. Biopharm. Stat. 2013, 23, 1081-1090.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Smejkal V.; Reis K. Risk Management in Companies and Other Organizations. 3. Vintage and Current; Grada: Prague, Check Republic, 2010; ISBN 978-80-247-3051-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Sventekova E.; Svetlik J. Permeable Performance Testing of Limiting Road Section. Proceedings of the 19th International Scientific Conference on Transport Means 2015, Kaunas, Lithuania, 21–22 October, ; pp. 543-546.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Talabi S.M.; Fishchbeck P. Advancing risk management in nuclear power plant EPC projects: An empirical evaluation of risk management practices on steam generator replacement projects. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management, Tampere, Finland, 28–30 September 2015, ; pp. 545-557.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Tatikonda M.V.; Rosenthal S.R. Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: A deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2000, 47, 74-87.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Testorelli R.; Lima P.F.D.A.; Verbano C. Fostering project risk management in SMEs: An emergent framework from a literature review. Prod. Plan. Control 2020, 1-15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. The future of Project Management: Global Outlook 2019. KPMG, AIPM, IPMA, Project Management Survey 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Touran A. Calculation of contingency in construction projects. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2003, 50, 135-140.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Treshchevsky D.Y.; Franovskaya G.N.; Gladkih M.O.; Treshchevskaya N.Y. Risks of innovative projects: An expert review. Digital Economy: Complexity and Variety vs. Rationalit; Popkova E.; Sergi B. Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Varcholova T.; Dubovicka L. New Management Risk; Iura Edition: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2008; ISBN 978-80-8078-191.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Vidal L.; Marle F. Understanding project complexity: Implications on project management. Kybernetes 2008, 37, 1094-1110.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. White S.; Pettit J. Participatory approaches and the measurement of human well-being. Human Well-Being; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 240-267.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Xing J.; Morrow S. White Paper: Practical Insights and Lessons Learned on Implementing Expert Elicitation; Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Rockville, MD, USA, 2006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Zaveckaite A.; Ulbinaite A. Assessment criteria of project risk management in language translation service companies. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2018, 24, 1323-1343.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Zhang H. A redefinition of the project risk process: Using vulnerability to open up the event-consequence link. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2007, 25, 694-701.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  87. Zholonko T.; Grebinchuk O.; Bielikova M.; Kulynych Y.; Oviechkina O. Methodological tools for investment risk assessment for the companies of real economy sector. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2021, 14.

  88. Zou P.X.W.; Chen Y.; Chan T.-Y. Understanding and improving your risk management capability: Assessment model for construction organizations. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2010, 136, 854-863.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Investigation into safety acceptance principles for autonomous ships. (2025). Valdez, Osiris A ; Bergstraom, Martin ; Rahikainen, Marko ; Bolbot, Victor.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:257:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832025000134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Supplier selection to support environmental sustainability: the stratified BWM TOPSIS method. (2023). Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi ; Gupta, Himanshu ; Ahmadi, Hadi Badri.
    In: Annals of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:annopr:v:322:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04878-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Integrated Agent-Based Simulation and Game Theory Decision Support Framework for Cash Flow and Payment Management in Construction Projects. (2023). Dorrah, Dalia H ; McCabe, Brenda.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:244-:d:1308320.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. A stratified decision-making model for long-term planning: Application in flood risk management in Scotland. (2023). Botelho, Tiago ; Chalvatzis, Konstantinos ; Bamford, David ; Vafadarnikjoo, Amin.
    In: Omega.
    RePEc:eee:jomega:v:116:y:2023:i:c:s0305048322002092.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Multi-factor dependence modelling with specified marginals and structured association in large-scale project risk assessment. (2022). Kim, Byung-Cheol.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:296:y:2022:i:2:p:679-695.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Towards a Conceptual Framework for Built Infrastructure Design in an Uncertain Climate: Challenges and Research Needs. (2021). Ivanov, Oskar Larsson ; Johansson, Jonas ; Bjornsson, Ivar ; Honfi, Daniel ; Nasr, Amro.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11827-:d:665390.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Sustainability of Business through Project Risk Identification with Use of Expert Estimates. (2021). Brutovsky, Michal ; Luskova, Maria ; Buganova, Katarina ; Kubas, Jozef ; Slepecky, Jaroslav.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6311-:d:567707.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. A Bayesian Network risk model for estimating coastal maritime transportation delays following an earthquake in British Columbia. (2021). Islam, Samsul ; Goerlandt, Floris.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:214:y:2021:i:c:s095183202100243x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. On the use of the €˜Return Of Safety Investments€™ (ROSI) measure for decision-making in the chemical processing industry. (2021). Dahl, Roy Endre ; Milazzo, Maria Francesca ; Selvik, Jon Tmmers ; Abrahamsen, Hkon Bjorheim ; Langdalen, Henrik ; Bansal, Surbhi.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:210:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021000958.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Review and Evaluation of the J100‐10 Risk and Resilience Management Standard for Water and Wastewater Systems. (2020). Washington, Valerie Nicole ; Chen, Thomas Yingjeh ; Aven, Terje ; Guikema, Seth David.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:3:p:608-623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. A hierarchical tree-based decision-making approach for assessing the relative trustworthiness of risk assessment models. (2020). Bani-Mustafa, Tasneem ; Pedroni, Nicola ; Beaudouin, Francois ; Zio, Enrico ; Vasseur, Dominique.
    In: Journal of Risk and Reliability.
    RePEc:sae:risrel:v:234:y:2020:i:6:p:748-763.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Uncertainties, Knowledge, and Futures in Foresight Studies — A Case of the Industry 4.0. (2020). Magruk, Andrzej.
    In: Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015).
    RePEc:hig:fsight:v:14:y:2020:i:4:p:20-33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. A New Framework To Idenitfy And Assess Hidden Assumptions In The Background Knowledge Of A Risk Assessment. (2020). Abrahamsen, Hkon Bjorheim ; Langdalen, Henrik.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:200:y:2020:i:c:s0951832019307938.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. An extended method for evaluating assumptions deviations in quantitative risk assessment and its application to external flooding risk assessment of a nuclear power plant. (2020). Zeng, Zhiguo ; Bani-Mustafa, Tasneem ; Flage, Roger ; Zio, Enrico ; Vasseur, Dominique.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:200:y:2020:i:c:s0951832018312079.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Assumptions in quantitative risk assessments: When explicit and when tacit?. (2020). Askeland, Tore ; Flage, Roger.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:197:y:2020:i:c:s0951832019302194.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Three influential risk foundation papers from the 80s and 90s: Are they still state-of-the-art?. (2020). Aven, Terje.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:193:y:2020:i:c:s0951832019302649.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Null Hypothesis Testing ≠ Scientific Inference: A Critique of the Shaky Premise at the Heart of the Science and Values Debate, and a Defense of Value‐Neutral Risk Assessment. (2019). MacGillivray, Brian H.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:39:y:2019:i:7:p:1520-1532.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Making Sense of Risk—A Sociological Perspective on the Management of Risk. (2019). Taarupesbensen, Jacob.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:39:y:2019:i:4:p:749-760.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. A semi-quantitative assessment process for improved use of the expected value of information measure in safety management. (2019). Aven, Terje ; Bjrnsen, Kjartan ; Selvik, Jon Tmmers.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:188:y:2019:i:c:p:494-502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Regulation under uncertainty: The coevolution of industry and regulation. (2018). Kristensen, Peer Hull ; Herrigel, Gary ; Sabel, Charles.
    In: Regulation & Governance.
    RePEc:wly:reggov:v:12:y:2018:i:3:p:371-394.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. An Interactive Model among Potential Human Risk Factors: 331 Cases of Coal Mine Roof Accidents in China. (2018). Liu, Yan ; Xue, Surui ; Tong, Ruipeng ; Jia, Qingli ; Zhai, Cunli ; Wu, Chunlin.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:6:p:1144-:d:150101.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Differences in the strengths of evidence matters in risk–risk trade-offs. (2017). Sahlin, Ullrika ; Rundlof, Maj.
    In: Journal of Risk Research.
    RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:20:y:2017:i:8:p:988-994.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Improving risk characterisations in practical situations by highlighting knowledge aspects, with applications to risk matrices. (2017). Aven, Terje.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:167:y:2017:i:c:p:42-48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Creating risk management strategies based on uncertain assumptions and aspects from assumption-based planning. (2017). Flage, Roger ; Berner, Christine Louise .
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:167:y:2017:i:c:p:10-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Incorporating assumption deviation risk in quantitative risk assessments: A semi-quantitative approach. (2017). Aven, Terje ; Khorsandi, Jahon.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:163:y:2017:i:c:p:22-32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Some perspectives on risk management: A security case study from the oil and gas industry. (2016). .
    In: Journal of Risk and Reliability.
    RePEc:sae:risrel:v:230:y:2016:i:5:p:512-520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Uncertainty treatment in risk analysis of complex systems: The cases of STAMP and FRAM. (2016). Bjerga, Torbjrn ; Aven, Terje ; Zio, Enrico.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:156:y:2016:i:c:p:203-209.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Comparing and integrating the NUSAP notational scheme with an uncertainty based risk perspective. (2016). Flage, Roger ; Berner, Christine Louise .
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:156:y:2016:i:c:p:185-194.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Strengthening quantitative risk assessments by systematic treatment of uncertain assumptions. (2016). Flage, R ; Berner, C.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:151:y:2016:i:c:p:46-59.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. On the Need for Rethinking Current Practice that Highlights Goal Achievement Risk in an Enterprise Context. (2015). Aven, Terje.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:35:y:2015:i:9:p:1706-1716.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. An Evaluation of the Treatment of Risk and Uncertainties in the IPCC Reports on Climate Change. (2015). Aven, Terje ; Renn, Ortwin.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:35:y:2015:i:4:p:701-712.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Maritime transportation risk analysis: Review and analysis in light of some foundational issues. (2015). Montewka, Jakub ; Goerlandt, Floris.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:138:y:2015:i:c:p:115-134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Perspectives on risk and the unforeseen. (2015). Haugen, Stein ; Vinnem, Jan Erik.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:137:y:2015:i:c:p:1-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Implications of black swans to the foundations and practice of risk assessment and management. (2015). Aven, Terje.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:134:y:2015:i:c:p:83-91.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Concerns, Challenges, and Directions of Development for the Issue of Representing Uncertainty in Risk Assessment. (2014). Aven, Terje ; Flage, Roger ; Baraldi, Piero ; Zio, Enrico.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:34:y:2014:i:7:p:1196-1207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. The substitution principle in chemical regulation: a constructive critique, by Ragnar Löfstedt. (2014). Aven, Terje.
    In: Journal of Risk Research.
    RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:17:y:2014:i:5:p:569-571.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Defining complexity for risk assessment of sociotechnical systems: A conceptual framework. (2014). .
    In: Journal of Risk and Reliability.
    RePEc:sae:risrel:v:228:y:2014:i:3:p:272-290.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. On a systematic perspective on risk for formal safety assessment (FSA). (2014). Kujala, Pentti ; Montewka, Jakub ; Goerlandt, Floris.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:127:y:2014:i:c:p:77-85.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. On the meaning of the special-cause variation concept used in the quality discourse €“ And its link to unforeseen and surprising events in risk management. (2014). Aven, Terje.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:126:y:2014:i:c:p:81-86.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. On how to understand and present the uncertainties in production assurance analyses, with a case study related to a subsea production system. (2014). Aven, Terje ; Pedersen, Linda Martens.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:124:y:2014:i:c:p:165-170.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Overtopping hazards to port activities: Application of a new methodology to risk management (POrt Risk MAnagement Tool). (2014). Gmez, Rebeca ; Molina, Rafael ; Pery, Pascual ; Castillo, Carmen ; Alises, Ana.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:123:y:2014:i:c:p:8-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. A new perspective on how to understand, assess and manage risk and the unforeseen. (2014). Aven, Terje ; Krohn, Bodil S.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:121:y:2014:i:c:p:1-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Probabilities and background knowledge as a tool to reflect uncertainties in relation to intentional acts. (2013). Aven, Terje.
    In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
    RePEc:eee:reensy:v:119:y:2013:i:c:p:229-234.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 22:53:15 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.