1. Exploring macro-environmental factors influencing adoption of result-based and collective agri-environmental measures: a PESTLE approach based on stakeholder statements. (2024). Eichhorn, Theresa ; Hamunen, Katri ; Schaller, Lena ; Runge, Tania.
   In: Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal.
   RePEc:ags:aieabj:347571.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Strategic Thinking and Its Role in Accelerating the Transition from the Linear to the Circular Economic Model—Case Study of the Agri-Food Sector in the Sibiu Depression Microregion, Romania. (2023). Iagru, Romulus ; Ipo, Anca.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3109-:d:1062115.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Using a Phosphorus Flow Diagram as a Boundary Object to Inform Stakeholder Engagement. (2023). Grieger, Khara D ; Merck, Ashton W ; Marshall, Anna-Maria ; Deviney, Alison.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11496-:d:1201961.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Can agriculture and conservation be compatible in a coastal wetland? Balancing stakeholders’ narratives and interactions in the management of El Hondo Natural Park, Spain. (2022). Ricart, Sandra ; Rico-Amoros, Antonio M.
   In: Agriculture and Human Values.
   RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:39:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10460-021-10271-5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Achinas, S.; Horjus, J.; Achinas, V.; Jan, G.; Euverink, W. A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5981. [CrossRef]

2. Ahlberg-Eliasson, K.; Nadeau, E.; Levén, L.; Schnürer, A. Production efficiency of Swedish farm-scale biogas plants. Biomass Bioenergy 2017, 97, 27–37. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Ammenberg, J.; Anderberg, S.; Lönnqvist, T.; Grönkvist, S.; Sandberg, T. Biogas in the transport sector—actor and policy analysis focusing on the demand side in the Stockholm region. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 129, 70–80. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

4. Ammenberg, J.; Dahlgren, S. Sustainability Assessment of Public Transport, Part I—A Multi-Criteria Assessment Method to Compare Different Bus Technologies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 825. [CrossRef]

5. Arfan, M.; Wang, Z.; Soam, S.; Eriksson, O. Biogas as a Transport Fuel—A System Analysis of Value Chain Development in a Swedish Context. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4560. [CrossRef]

6. Attride-Stirling, J. Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual. Res. 2001, 1, 385–405. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Barnard, C.I. The Functions of the Executive; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1938; ISBN 0674328000.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Boyatzis, R.E. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1998; ISBN 978-0-7619-0960-6.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Bracke, M.B.M.; de Greef, K.H.; Hopster, H. Qualitative stakeholder analysis for the development of sustainable monitoring systems for farm animal welfare. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2005, 18, 27–56. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Brunklaus, B.; Rex, E.; Carlsson, E.; Berlin, J. The future of Swedish food waste: An environmental assessment of existing and prospective valorization techniques. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 202, 1–10. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Christodoulou, A.; Cullinane, K. Identifying the main opportunities and challenges from the implementation of a port energy management system: A SWOT/PESTLE analysis. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6046. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 8003 20 of 20

13. Colvin, R.M.; Witt, G.B.; Lacey, J. Power, perspective, and privilege: The challenge of translating stakeholder theory from business management to environmental and natural resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 271, 110974. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Cong, R.G.; Caro, D.; Thomsen, M. Is it beneficial to use biogas in the Danish transport sector?—An environmental-economic analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 165, 1025–1035. [CrossRef]

15. Corvellec, H. Sustainability objects as performative definitions of sustainability: The case of food-waste-based biogas and biofertilizers. J. Mater. Cult. 2016, 21, 383–401. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

16. Dangelico, R.M.; Nonino, F. Sustainable Project Management: A Conceptualization-Oriented Review and a Framework Proposal for Future Studies. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1–16.

17. Danso, A.; Adomako, S.; Lartey, T.; Amankwah-Amoah, J.; Owusu-Yirenkyi, D. Stakeholder integration, environmental sustainability orientation and financial performance. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 119, 652–662. [CrossRef]

18. Elkington, J. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business; Capstone: Oxford, UK, 1997; ISBN 1-900961-27-X.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Eskerod, P.; Huemann, M. Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: What standards say. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2013, 6, 36–50. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Freeman, R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach; Pitman: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1984; ISBN 9781405164023.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Freeman, R.E.; Harrison, J.; Wicks, A.C.; Parmar, B.; de Colle, S. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010; ISBN 978-0-521-19081-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Freeman, R.E.; Phillips, R.; Sisodia, R. Tensions in Stakeholder Theory. Bus. Soc. 2020, 59, 213–231. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Friese, S. Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS.ti, 3rd ed.; SAGE Publications Inc.: London, UK, 2019; ISBN 9781526458926.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Friese, S.; Susanne, F. ATLAS.ti 8 Windows User Manual; GmbH, ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development: Berlin, Germany, 2020; ISBN 978-1-4799-1749-5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Froehlich, D.E.; Van Waes, S.; Schäfer, H. Linking Quantitative and Qualitative Network Approaches: A Review of Mixed Methods Social Network Analysis in Education Research. Rev. Res. Educ. 2020, 44, 244–268. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. Gasparski, W.W. The stakeholder organisation theory and its systemic foundation. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 2009, 38, 659–665. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. Gilbert Silvius, A.J.; Schipper, R. Exploring the relationship between sustainability and project success—Conceptual model and expected relationships. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Proj. Manag. 2016, 4, 5–22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Hörisch, J.; Freeman, R.E.; Schaltegger, S. Applying Stakeholder Theory in Sustainability Management: Links, Similarities, Dissimilarities, and a Conceptual Framework. Organ. Environ. 2014, 27, 328–346. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Hellsmark, H.; Söderholm, P. Innovation policies for advanced biorefinery development: Key considerations and lessons from Sweden. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2017, 11, 28–40. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Henriksen, L.F. The global network of biofuel sustainability standards-setters. Env. Polit. 2015, 24, 115–137. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Hwang, S. Utilizing qualitative data analysis software: A review of Atlas.ti. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 2008, 26, 519–527. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Karlsson, N.P.E.E.; Hoveskog, M.; Halila, F.; Mattsson, M. Business modelling in farm-based biogas production: Towards network-level business models and stakeholder business cases for sustainability. Sustain. Sci. 2019, 14, 1071–1090. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Karlsson, N.P.E.E.; Hoveskog, M.; Halila, F.; Mattsson, M. Early phases of the business model innovation process for sustainability: Addressing the status quo of a Swedish biogas-producing farm cooperative. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 172, 2759–2772. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 8003 19 of 20
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Karsson, N.P.E. Business models and business cases for financial sustainability: Insights on corporate sustainability in the Swedish farm-based biogas industry. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2019, 18, 115–129. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

35. Kuchta, D.; Mrzygłocka-Chojnacka, J. An approach to increase the sustainability of projects and their outcomes in public sector through improving project definition. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4804. [CrossRef]

36. Lönnqvist, T.; Anderberg, S.; Ammenberg, J.; Sandberg, T.; Grönkvist, S. Stimulating biogas in the transport sector in a Swedish region—An actor and policy analysis with supply side focus. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 113, 109269. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Lönnqvist, T.; Grönkvist, S.; Sandberg, T. Forest-derived methane in the Swedish transport sector: A closing window? Energy Policy 2017, 105, 440–450. [CrossRef]

38. Laplume, A.O.; Sonpar, K.; Litz, R.A. Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. J. Manag. 2008, 34, 1152–1189. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Larsson, M.; Grönkvist, S.; Alvfors, P. Upgraded biogas for transport in Sweden—Effects of policy instruments on production, infrastructure deployment and vehicle sales. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 3774–3784. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Luthe, T.; Wyss, R. Resilience to climate change in a cross-scale tourism governance context: A combined quantitative-qualitative network analysis. Ecol. Soc. 2016, 21, 27. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Lyon, C.; Cordell, D.; Jacobs, B.; Martin-Ortega, J.; Marshall, R.; Camargo-Valero, M.A.; Sherry, E. Five pillars for stakeholder analyses in sustainability transformations: The global case of phosphorus. Environ. Sci. Policy 2020, 107, 80–89. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

42. Miles, S. Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 142, 437–459. [CrossRef]

43. Mutter, A. Obduracy and Change in Urban Transport—Understanding Competition Between Sustainable Fuels in Swedish Municipalities. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6092. [CrossRef]

44. Rambaree, K. Abductive thematic network analysis (ATNA) using ATLAS-ti. In Innovative Research Methodologies in Management: Volume I: Philosophy, Measurement and Modelling; Moutinho, L., Sokele, M., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; ISBN 9783319643946.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. Reed, M.S.; Graves, A.; Dandy, N.; Posthumus, H.; Hubacek, K.; Morris, J.; Prell, C.; Quinn, C.H.; Stringer, L.C. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 1933–1949. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Rhenman, E.; Stymne, B. Företagsledning I en förändelig värld; Aldus/Bonniers: Stockholm, Sweden, 1965; ISBN 951-96013-6-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
47. Saldaña, J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 2nd ed.; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2013; pp. 61–86. ISBN 9781446247365.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Scott, J. Social Network Analysis, 4th ed.; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2017; ISBN 9781473952119.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. Severin, A.; Chataway, J. Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions. Learn. Publ. 2021, 34, 144–155. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Silver, C.; Lewins, A. Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide, 1st ed.; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2014; ISBN 9781446249727.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

51. Steurer, R. Mapping stakeholder theory anew: From the “Stakeholder Theory of the Firm” to three perspectives on business-society relations. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2006, 15, 55–69. [CrossRef]

52. Sundström, A. Globalisation, CSR and Business Legitimacy in Local Relationships; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala, Sweden, 2009; ISBN 978-91-86195-70-0.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Svensk Författningssamling. ‘Lagm Ändring i Lagen (2003:460) om Etikprövning av Forskning som Avser Människor’. 2018. Available online: https://www.lagboken.se/views/pages/getfile.ashx?portalId=56anddocId=3472817andpropId=5 (accessed on 10 September 2020).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

54. Toljaga-Nikolić, D.; Todorović, M.; Dobrota, M.; Obradović, T.; Obradović, V. Project management and sustainability: Playing trick or treat with the planet. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8619. [CrossRef]

55. Uribe, D.F. What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1300. [CrossRef]

56. Valentinov, V.; Hajdu, A. Integrating instrumental and normative stakeholder theories: A systems theory approach. J. Organ. Chang. Manag. 2019. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
57. Valentinov, V.; Roth, S.; Will, M.G. Stakeholder Theory: A Luhmannian Perspective. Adm. Soc. 2019, 51, 826–849. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
58. Varvasovszky, Z.; Brugha, R. A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy Plan. 2016, 24, 96–99. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

59. Whyte, P.; Lamberton, G. Conceptualising sustainability using a cognitive mapping method. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1977. [CrossRef]

60. Wu, W.; He, F.; Zhuang, T.; Yi, Y. Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in the Decision-Making of Industrial Land Redevelopment in China: The Case of Shanghai. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9206. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
61. Yousuf, A.; Khan, M.R.; Pirozzi, D.; Ab Wahid, Z. Financial sustainability of biogas technology: Barriers, opportunities, and solutions. Energy Sources Part B Econ. Plan. Policy 2016, 11, 841–848. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

62. Yudha, S.W.; Tjahjono, B.; Kolios, A. A PESTLE policy mapping and stakeholder analysis of Indonesia’s fossil fuel energy industry. Energies 2018, 11, 1–22.

63. Zhou, S.; Zhou, M.; Wang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shi, C.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, T. Bibliometric and social network analysis of civil engineering sustainability research from 2015 to 2019. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6842. [CrossRef]

1. Identification and prioritisation of barriers and drivers for achieving ethanol blending target in India using Delphi-PESTEL-Fuzzy-AHP method. (2024). Datta, Subir ; Roy, Bidesh ; Dey, Bishal.
   In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
   RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02717-5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Critical Factors for Green Public Procurement: The Case of Greece. (2024). Tsoulfas, Giannis T ; Rachaniotis, Nikolaos P ; Dimitriou, Dimitrios J ; Orfanidou, Varvara S.
   In: Logistics.
   RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:127-:d:1537673.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. A composite index for the evaluation of sustainability in Latin American public transport systems. (2024). Gerike, Regine ; Velasco, Alexandra.
   In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
   RePEc:eee:transa:v:179:y:2024:i:c:s0965856423003592.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Deriving a justified budget for peatland rewetting – Applying the German coal phase-out as a blueprint. (2024). Lakner, Sebastian ; Sommer, Pia ; Nordt, Anke ; Tanneberger, Franziska ; Wegmann, Johannes.
   In: Land Use Policy.
   RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:147:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724003168.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Boosting Biowaste Valorisation—Do We Need an Accelerated Regional Implementation of the European Law for End-of-Waste?. (2023). Gunther, Susann ; Mengato, Sara ; Siegfried, Konrad ; Riedel, Fabian ; Thran, Daniela.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13147-:d:1230719.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. A systematic review on the acceptance of alternative marine fuels. (2023). Bilgili, Levent.
   In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
   RePEc:eee:rensus:v:182:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123002241.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Drivers and Barriers to Substituting Firewood with Biomass Briquettes in the Kenyan Tea Industry. (2022). Makenzi, Macben ; Thran, Daniela ; Mair-Bauernfeind, Claudia ; Suryani, Amalia ; Bezama, Alberto.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5611-:d:809983.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. The Evolution of Ireland’s Medical Device Cluster and Its Future Direction. (2022). McDermott, Olivia ; McKernan, David.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10166-:d:889507.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Converting Municipal Waste to Energy through the Biomass Chain, a Key Technology for Environmental Issues in (Smart) Cities. (2021). Vrabie, Catalin.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4633-:d:540600.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Special Issue on Assessing the Modern Bioenergy Potential and Strategies for Sustainable Development: Transformations through Nexus, Policy, and Innovations. (2021). Purohit, Pallav ; Khatiwada, Dilip.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:374-:d:474180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Measurements of the Emissions of a “Golden” Vehicle at Seven Laboratories with Portable Emission Measurement Systems (PEMS). (2021). Rossi, Tommaso ; Casadei, Simone ; Forloni, Fabrizio ; Giechaskiel, Barouch ; di Domenico, Andrea.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8762-:d:609080.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. A Collaborative Learning Activity to Analyze the Sustainability of an Innovation Using PESTLE. (2021). Casa, Maria Jose ; Alier, Marc ; Llorens, Ariadna.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8756-:d:608990.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Qualitative Stakeholder Analysis for a Swedish Regional Biogas Development: A Thematic Network Approach. (2021). Wang, Zhao ; Ingela, Sandra Ann ; Rambaree, Komalsingh ; Sundstrom, Agneta.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8003-:d:596279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Toward a Sustainable Decommissioning of Offshore Platforms in the Oil and Gas Industry: A PESTLE Analysis. (2021). Basile, Vincenzo ; Vona, Roberto ; Capobianco, Nunzia ; Loia, Francesca.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6266-:d:567296.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis of Sustainable Urban Public Transport Systems. (2021). de Vicente, Maria Auxiliadora ; Gutierrez, Lourdes Rivero ; Romero-Ania, Alberto.
    In: Mathematics.
    RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:16:p:1844-:d:608513.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Developments and Trends of Mergers and Acquisitions in the Energy Industry. (2021). Andriukeviius, Karolis ; Treimikien, Dalia.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2158-:d:535056.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Comparative TCO Analysis of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Buses for Public Transport System in Small to Midsize Cities. (2021). Soylu, Tamer ; Luise, Renato ; Hartmann, Niklas ; Zeller, Maxime ; Kim, Hanhee.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:14:p:4384-:d:598018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. A Multifaceted Challenge to Enhance Multicriteria Decision Support for Energy Policy. (2021). Krysiak, Magdalena ; Kluczek, Aldona.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:14:p:4128-:d:590863.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental dimensions of electric vehicle adoption in the United States: A social-media interaction analysis. (2021). Reiner, David ; Bardhan, Ronita ; Debnath, Ramit ; Miller, J R.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:152:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121009813.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Covid-19 shock: Development of strategic management framework for global energy. (2021). Seyed, Seyed Mohsen ; Davoudi, Mehdi ; Zeinalnezhad, Masoomeh ; Kleme, Jii Jaromir ; Goni, Feybi Ariani ; Chofreh, Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:139:y:2021:i:c:s1364032120309278.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. A birds eye view of Ghanas renewable energy sector environment: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making approach. (2021). Mohsin, Muhammad ; Sanka, Michael Nii ; Amjad, Fahd ; Agyekum, Ephraim Bonah.
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:70:y:2021:i:c:s0957178721000539.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Methodology for Solving the Sustainable Dispatch Problem. (2020). Nepomuceno, Leonardo ; Baptista, Edmea Cassia ; Soler, Edilaine Martins ; Jones, Dylan ; Balbo, Antonio Roberto ; Dos, Andrea Camila.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6780-:d:402060.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Local Entrepreneurs’ Involvement in Strategy Building to Facilitate Agro-Food Waste Valorisation within an Agro-Food Technological District: A SWOT-SOR Approach. (2020). Materia, Valentina Cristiana ; Sisto, Roberta ; Prosperi, Maurizio ; Lopolito, Antonio.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4523-:d:366480.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-30 02:44:27 || Missing content? Let us know