Allen, D.W.E.; Berg, C.; Markey-Towler, B.; Novak, M.; Potts, J. Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy. Res. Policy 2020, 49, 103865. [CrossRef]
Aquilani, B.; Piccarozzi, M.; Abbate, T.; Codini, A. The Role of Open Innovation and Value Co-creation in the Challenging Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0: Toward a Theoretical Framework. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8943. [CrossRef]
- Ashford, N.A. Government and Environmental Innovation in Europe and North America. Am. Behav. Sci. 2002, 45, 1417â1434. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bentler, P.M.; Chou, C. Practical Issues in Structural Modeling. Sociol. Method Res. 1987, 16, 78â117. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chatfield, A.T.; Reddick, C.G. The role of policy entrepreneurs in open government data policy innovation diffusion: An analysis of Australian Federal and State Governments. Gov. Inf. Q 2018, 35, 123â134. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chin, W.W. Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quart. 1998, 22, viiâxvi.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cho, J.; Cheon, Y.; Jun, J.W.; Lee, S. Digital advertising policy acceptance by out-of-home advertising firms: A combination of TAM and TOE framework. Int. J. Advert. 2021, 1â19. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Coad, A.; Segarra, A.; Teruel, M. Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? Res. Policy 2016, 45, 387â400. [CrossRef]
Costantini, V.; Crespi, F.; Palma, A. Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies. Res. Policy 2017, 46, 799â819. [CrossRef]
- Diamantopoulos, A. Modelling with LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. J. Mark. Manag. 1994, 10, 105â136. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fan, J.P.H.; Wong, T.J.; Zhang, T. Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of Chinaâs newly partially privatized firms. J. Financ. Econ. 2007, 84, 330â357. [CrossRef]
Flanagan, K.; Uyarra, E. Four dangers in innovation policy studiesâAnd how to avoid them. Ind. Innov. 2016, 23, 177â188. [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39â50. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Freeman, C. The âNational System of Innovationâ in historical perspective. Camb. J. Econ. 1995, 19, 5â24.
Guan, J.; Yam, R.C.M. Effects of government financial incentives on firmsâ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s. Res. Policy 2015, 44, 273â282. [CrossRef]
Hagedoorn, J. Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Schumpeter Revisited. Ind. Corp. Chang. 1996, 5, 883â896. [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Babin, B.J.; Krey, N. Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling in the Journal of Advertising: Review and Recommendations. J. Advert. 2017, 46, 163â177. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th ed.; Cengage Learning: Andover, UK, 2019; p.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Han, S. CEO political preference and corporate innovation. Financ. Res. Lett. 2019, 28, 370â375. [CrossRef]
- Havas, A.; Weber, K.M. The âfitâ between forward-looking activities and the innovation policy governance sub-system: A framework to explore potential impacts. Technol. Forecast Soc. 2012, 115, 327â337. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hayes, A.F. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium. Commun. Monogr. 2009, 76, 408â420. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 11352 19 of 19
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hellström, T. Systemic innovation and risk: Technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technol. Soc. 2003, 25, 369â384. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hobday, M.; Boddington, A.; Grantham, A. Policies for design and policies for innovation: Contrasting perspectives and remaining challenges. Technovation 2012, 32, 272â281. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Jackson, D.L.; Gillaspy, J.A.; Purc-Stephenson, R. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychol. Methods 2009, 14, 6â23. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jia, C.; Tang, X.; Kan, Z. Does the Nation Innovation System in China Support the Sustainability of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Innovation? Sustainability 2020, 12, 2562. [CrossRef]
- Joly, P. PolicyâReinventing Innovation: From Criticisms of the Traditional Paradigm to Policy Transformation; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 281â286.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kern, F.; Rogge, K.S.; Howlett, M. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies. Res. Policy 2019, 48, 103832. [CrossRef]
Kleinknecht, A.; Verspagen, B. Demand and innovation: Schmookler re-examined. Res. Policy 1990, 19, 387â394. [CrossRef]
Kuhlmann, S. Future governance of innovation policy in EuropeâThree scenarios. Res. Policy 2001, 30, 953â976. [CrossRef]
- Kuo, C.; Shyu, J.Z.; Ding, K. Industrial revitalization via industry 4.0âA comparative policy analysis among China, Germany and the USA. Glob. Transit. 2019, 1, 3â14. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kuzemko, C.; Mitchell, C.; Lockwood, M.; Hoggett, R. Policies, politics and demand side innovations: The untold story of Germanyâs energy transition. Energy Res. Soc. Sci 2017, 28, 58â67. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lanahan, L.; Feldman, M.P. Multilevel innovation policy mix: A closer look at state policies that augment the federal SBIR program. Res. Policy 2015, 44, 1387â1402. [CrossRef]
- Lanahan, L.; Joshi, A.M.; Johnson, E. Do public R&D subsidies produce jobs? Evidence from the SBIR/STTR program. Res. Policy 2021, 50, 104286.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lee, K.; Herold, D.M.; Yu, A. Small and Medium Enterprises and Corporate Social Responsibility Practice: A Swedish Perspective. Corp. Soc. Resp. Env. Manag. 2016, 23, 88â99. [CrossRef]
Leonidou, E.; Christofi, M.; Vrontis, D.; Thrassou, A. An integrative framework of stakeholder engagement for innovation management and entrepreneurship development. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 119, 245â258. [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Wang, M.; Xiangli, L. Do government subsidies promote new-energy firmsâ innovation? Evidence from dynamic and threshold models. J. Clean Prod. 2021, 286, 124992. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Li, S.; Lu, J.W. A Dual-Agency Model of Firm CSR in Response to Institutional Pressure: Evidence from Chinese Publicly Listed Firms. Acad. Manag. J. 2019, 63, 2004â2032. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lin, K.; Shyu, J.; Ding, K. A Cross-Strait Comparison of Innovation Policy under Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Development Transition. Sustainability 2017, 9, 786. [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; De Giovanni, P. Green process innovation through Industry 4.0 technologies and supply chain coordination. Ann. Oper. Res. 2019. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Liu, S.X. Innovation Design: Made in China 2025. Des. Manag. Rev. 2016, 27, 52â58.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
MA, L.; HU, J. An Analysis of the Eco-Innovation Mechanism and Policies in the Pulp and Paper Industry Based on Coupled Game Theory and System Dynamics. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3482. [CrossRef]
- MacKinnon, D.P.; Lockwood, C.M.; Williams, J. Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods. Multivar. Behav. Res. 2004, 39, 99â128. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Magro, E.; Wilson, J.R. Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix. Res. Policy 2013, 42, 1647â1656. [CrossRef]
Marzucchi, A.; Antonioli, D.; Montresor, S. Industryâresearch co-operation within and across regional boundaries. What does innovation policy add? Pap. Reg. Sci. 2015, 94, 499â524. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 11352 18 of 19
Mazzucato, M. From market fixing to market-creating: A new framework for innovation policy. Ind. Innov. 2016, 23, 140â156. [CrossRef]
McConnell, A. Policy Success, Policy Failure and Grey Areas In-Between. J. Public Policy 2010, 30, 345â362. [CrossRef]
- McConnell, A. What is policy failure? A primer to help navigate the maze. Public Policy Admin. 2015, 30, 221â242. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
McEwan, C.; Mawdsley, E.; Banks, G.; Scheyvens, R. Enrolling the Private Sector in Community Development: Magic Bullet or Sleight of Hand? Dev. Chang. 2017, 48, 28â53. [CrossRef]
Meissner, D.; Kergroach, S. Innovation policy mix: Mapping and measurement. J. Technol. Transf. 2021, 46, 197â222. [CrossRef]
Meuleman, M.; De Maeseneire, W. Do R&D subsidies affect SMEsâ access to external financing? Res. Policy 2012, 41, 580â591.
- Nagy, J.; Oláh, J.; Erdei, E.; Máté, D.; Popp, J. The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value ChainâThe Case of Hungary. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3491. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Nambisan, S.; Wright, M.; Feldman, M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Res. Policy 2019, 48, 103773. [CrossRef]
- Ong, M.H.A.; Puteh, F. Quantitative Data Analysis: Choosing Between SPSS, PLS and AMOS in Social Science Research. Int. Interdiscip. J. Sci. Res. 2017, 3, 14â25.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Pandza, K.; Ellwood, P. Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation. Res. Policy 2013, 42, 1112â1125. [CrossRef]
- Patanakul, P.; Pinto, J.K. Examining the roles of government policy on innovation. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 2014, 25, 97â107. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pierce, T.P.; Willy, C.; Roncace, R.; Bischoff, J. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: Policy Acceptance Model (PAM). Am. J. Health Sci. 2014, 5, 129â144. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ping, R.A. On assuring valid measures for theoretical models using survey data. J. Bus. Res. 2004, 57, 125â141. [CrossRef]
Polemis, M.L.; Tselekounis, M. Threshold effects in the regulation-innovation nexus: Evidence from the telecommunications industry. J. Regul. Econ. 2021, 60, 74â93. [CrossRef]
Rahman, S.A.; Taghizadeh, S.K.; Ramayah, T.; Alam, M.M.D. Technology acceptance among micro-entrepreneurs in marginalized social strata: The case of social innovation in Bangladesh. Technol. Forecast Soc. 2017, 118, 236â245. [CrossRef]
- Sölvell, Ã. The Competitive Advantage of Nations 25 yearsâOpening up new perspectives on competitiveness. Compet. Rev. 2015, 25, 471â481. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sayaf, A.M.; Alamri, M.M.; Alqahtani, M.A.; Al-Rahmi, W.M. Information and Communications Technology Used in Higher Education: An Empirical Study on Digital Learning as Sustainability. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7074. [CrossRef]
Schot, J.; Steinmueller, W.E. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Res. Policy 2018, 47, 1554â1567.
- Shi, D.; DiStefano, C.; Maydeu-Olivares, A.; Lee, T. Evaluating SEM Model Fit with Small Degrees of Freedom. Multivar Behav Res 2021, 56, 1â36. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Skordoulis, M.; Ntanos, S.; Kyriakopoulos, G.L.; Arabatzis, G.; Galatsidas, S.; Chalikias, M. Environmental Innovation, Open Innovation Dynamics and Competitive Advantage of Medium and Large-Sized Firms. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 195. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Su, H.; Moaniba, I.M. Does innovation respond to climate change? Empirical evidence from patents and greenhouse gas emissions. Technol. Forecast Soc. 2017, 122, 49â62. [CrossRef]
Sunder, J.; Sunder, S.V.; Zhang, J. Pilot CEOs and corporate innovation. J. Financ. Econ. 2017, 123, 209â224. [CrossRef]
- Thomä, J. DUI mode learning and barriers to innovationâA case from Germany. Res. Policy 2017, 46, 1327â1339. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Timmermans, J.; van der Heiden, S.; Born, M.P. Policy entrepreneurs in sustainability transitions: Their personality and leadership profiles assessed. Env. Innov Soc. Tr. 2014, 13, 96â108. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Turkyilmaz, A.; Dikhanbayeva, D.; Suleiman, Z.; Shaikholla, S.; Shehab, E. Industry 4.0: Challenges and opportunities for Kazakhstan SMEs. Procedia CIRP 2021, 96, 213â218. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F.D. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Manag. Sci 2000, 46, 186â204. [CrossRef]
Wang, F.; Chen, K. Do product imitation and innovation require different patterns of organizational innovation? Evidence from Chinese firms. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 106, 60â74. [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Qian, C. Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Financial Performance: The Roles of Stakeholder Response and Political Access. Acad. Manag. J. 2011, 54, 1159â1181. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ye, X.; Ma, L.; Feng, J.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, Z. Impact of Technology Habitual Domain on Ambidextrous Innovation: Case Study of a Chinese High-Tech Enterprise. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4602. [CrossRef]
Yun, J.J.; Lee, M.; Park, K.; Zhao, X. Open Innovation and Serial Entrepreneurs. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5055. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Ji, W.; Tao, J.; Wang, Q. Who Shall Leave? How CEO Preference and Power Affect Executive Turnover in Chinese Listed Companies. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2011, 19, 547â561. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now