Alvarez-Herranz, A.; Balsalobre-Lorente, D.; Shahbaz, M.; Cantos, J.M. Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy 2017, 105, 386â397. [CrossRef]
Andreoni, J.; Levinson, A. The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. J. Public Econ. 2001, 80, 269â286. [CrossRef]
- Breitung, J. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Adv. Econom. 2000, 15, 161â177.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Chen, F.; Jiang, G.; Kitila, G.M. Trade openness and CO2 emissions: The heterogeneous and mediating effects for the belt and road countries. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1958. [CrossRef]
Choi, I. Unit root tests for panel data. J. Int. Money Financ. 2001, 20, 249â272. [CrossRef]
Cole, M.A. Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: Examining the linkages. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 48, 71â81. [CrossRef]
Dinda, S. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 49, 431â455. [CrossRef]
Dumitrescu, E.I.; Hurlin, C. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ. Model. 2012, 29, 1450â1460. [CrossRef]
- Essandoh, O.K.; Islam, M.; Kakinaka, M. Linking international trade and foreign direct investment to CO2 emissions: Any differences between developed and developing countries? Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 712, 136437. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Granger, C.W.J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969, 37, 424â438. [CrossRef]
Grossman, G.M.; Krueger, A.B. Economic growth and the environment. Q. J. Econ. 1995, 110, 353â377. [CrossRef]
Hadri, K. Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econom. J. 2000, 3, 148â161. [CrossRef]
Harris, R.D.F.; Tzavalis, E. Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed. J. Econom. 1999, 91, 201â226. [CrossRef]
- Hotak, S.; Islam, M.; Kakinka, M.; Kotani, K. Carbon emissions and carbon trade balances: International evidence from panel ARDL analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 24115â24128. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hsiao, C. Panel data analysis-advantages and challenges. TEST 2007, 16, 1â22. [CrossRef]
Im, K.S.; Pesaran, M.H.; Shin, Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J. Econom. 2003, 115, 53â74. [CrossRef]
Jin, T.; Kim, J. Coal consumption and economic growth: Panel cointegration and causality evidence from OECD and Non-OECD countries. Sustainability 2018, 10, 660. [CrossRef]
- Kang, H.S. A study on the relationship between international trade and food security: Evidence from less developed countries (LDCs). Agric. Econ. Czech 2015, 61, 475â483. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kasman, A.; Duman, Y.S. CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: A panel data analysis. Econ. Model. 2015, 44, 97â103. [CrossRef]
Kirikkaleli, D.; Adebayo, T.S. Do renewable energy consumption and financial development matter for environmental sustainability ? New global evidence. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 29, 583â594. [CrossRef]
- Kirikkaleli, D.; Adebayo, T.S.; Khan, Z.; Khan, Z. Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 14009â14017. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lee, C.C. Energy consumption and GDP in developing countries: A cointegrated panel analysis. Energy Econ. 2005, 27, 415â427. [CrossRef]
Leitão, N.C.; Lorente, D.B. The Linkage between Economic Growth, Renewable Energy, Tourism, CO2 Emissions, and International Trade: The Evidence for the European Union. Energies 2020, 13, 4838. [CrossRef]
Levin, A.; Lin, C.F.; Chu, C.S.J. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J. Econom. 2002, 108, 1â24. [CrossRef]
Lopez, L.; Weber, S. Testing for Granger causality in panel data. STATA J. 2017, 17, 972â984. [CrossRef]
Mahmood, H.; Maalel, N.; Zarrad, O. Trade Openness and CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Tunisia. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3295. [CrossRef]
Managi, S.; Hibiki, A.; Tsurumi, T. Does trade openness improve environmental quality? J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2009, 58, 346â363. [CrossRef]
Nam, K.; Lee, S.; Jeon, H. Nonlinearity between CO2 emission and economic development: Evidence from a functional coefficient panel approach. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10258. [CrossRef]
Neal, T. Panel cointegration analysis with xtpedroni. STATA J. 2014, 14, 684â692. [CrossRef]
Panayotou, T. Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. ILO Work. Pap. 1993, WP.238, 1â42.
- Park, H. Is carbon neutral policy compatible with sustainable economic growth? Env. Resour. Econ. Rev. 2021, 30, 347â364.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Pedroni, P. Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2001, 83, 727â731. [CrossRef]
- Peters, G.P.; Hertwich, E.G. CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 1401â1407. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Peters, G.P.; Marland, G.; Hertwich, E.G.; Saikku, L.; Rautiainen, A.; Kauppi, P.E. Trade, transport, and sinks extend the carbon dioxide responsibility of countries: An editorial essay. Clim. Chang. 2009, 97, 379â388. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Peters, G.P.; Minx, J.C.; Weber, C.L.; Edenhofer, O. Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 8903â8908. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rafiq, S.; Salim, R.; Apergis, N. Agriculture, trade openness and emissions: An empirical analysis and policy options. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2015, 60, 348â365. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Safi, A.; Chen, Y.; Wahab, S.; Ali, S.; Yi, X.; Imran, M. Financial Instability and Consumption-based Carbon Emission in E-7 Countries: The Role of Trade and Economic Growth. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 383â391. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Saidi, K.; Hammami, S. The impact of CO2 emissions and economic growth on energy consumption in 58 countries. Energy Rep. 2015, 1, 62â70. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Salari, M.; Javide, R.J.; Noghanibehambari, H. The nexus between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in the U.S. Econ. Anal. Policy 2021, 69, 182â194. [CrossRef]
Song, T.; Zheng, T.; Tong, L. An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A panel cointegration approach. China Econ. Rev. 2008, 19, 381â392. [CrossRef]
Stern, D.I. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev. 2004, 32, 1419â1439. [CrossRef]
Tachega, M.A.; Yao, X.; Liu, Y.; Ahmed, D.; Ackaah, W.; Gabir, M.; Gyimah, J. Income Heterogeneity and the Environmental Kuznets Curve Turning Points: Evidence from Africa. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5634. [CrossRef]
Yamano, N.; Guilhoto, J. CO2 emissions embodied in international trade and domestic final demand: Methodology and results using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output Database. OECD Sci. Technol. Ind. Work. Pap. 2020, 11, 1â57. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12114 20 of 20
Zhang, H. Technology Innovation, Economic Growth and Carbon Emissions in the Context of Carbon Neutrality: Evidence from BRICS. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11138. [CrossRef]