create a website

Consumers’ Perception on Traceability of Greek Traditional Foods in the Post-COVID-19 Era. (2021). Bintsis, Thomas ; Kosma, Ioanna S ; Karantonis, Haralabos C ; Chasioti, Eleni ; Skalkos, Dimitris.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12687-:d:680562.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 3

Citations received by this document

Cites: 75

References cited by this document

Cocites: 26

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Prioritization of e-traceability drivers in the agri-food supply chains. (2023). Tadi, Sneana ; Miglietta, Pier Paolo ; Krsti, Mladen ; Agnusdei, Giulio Paolo.
    In: Agricultural and Food Economics.
    RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:11:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-023-00284-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Consumers’ Motives on Wine Tourism in Greece in the Post-COVID-19 Era. (2023). Kosma, Ioanna S ; Skalkos, Dimitris ; Santorinaios, Athanasios.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16225-:d:1285968.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on College Students’ Food Choice Motives in Greece. (2023). Kalyva, Zoi C ; Kosma, Ioanna S ; Skalkos, Dimitris.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:9865-:d:1175799.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Almli, V.L. Consumer Acceptance of Innovations in Traditional Food. Attitudes, Expectations and Perception. Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, 2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Balcombe, K.; Bradley, D.; Fraser, I.; Hussein, M. Consumer preferences regarding country of origin for multiple meat products. Food Policy 2016, 64, 49–62. [CrossRef]

  3. Bojnec, S.; Petrescu, D.C.; Petrescu-Mag, R.M.; Radulescu, C.V. Locally Produced Organic Food: Consumer Preferences. Amfiteatru Econ. 2019, 21, 209–227. [CrossRef]

  4. Britwum, K.; Yiannaka, A. Consumer willingness to pay for food safety interventions: The role of message framing and issue involvement. Food Policy 2019, 86, 101726. [CrossRef]

  5. Chang, A.; Tseng, C.-H.; Chu, M.-Y. Value creation from a food traceability system based on a hierarchical model of consumer personality traits. Br. Food J. 2013, 115, 1361–1380. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Chinnici, G.; d’Amico, M.; Pecorino, B. A multivariate statistical analysis on the consumers of organic products. Br. Food J. 2002, 104, 187–199. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Dandage, K.; Badia-Melis, R.; Ruiz-Garcia, L. Indian perspective in food traceability: A review. Food Control. 2017, 71, 217–227. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. De Leeuw, A.; Valois, P.; Ajzen, I.; Schmidt, P. Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying proenvironmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. J. Environ. Psychol. 2015, 42, 128–138. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Dimitropoulos, P.; Koronios, K.; Thrassou, A.; Vrontis, D. Cash holdings, corporate performance and viability of Greek SMEs: Implications for stakeholder relationship management. EuroMed J. Bus. 2019, 15, 333–348. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Droulers, O.; Amar, J. The legibility of food package information in France: An equal challenge for young and elderly consumers? Public Health Nutr. 2016, 19, 1059–1066. [CrossRef]

  11. ELSTAT. Greek Statistics. 2021. Available online: www.statistics.gr/en/the-greek-economy (accessed on 15 October 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Epstein, L.H.; Jankowiak, N.; Nederkoorn, C.; Raynor, H.A.; French, S.A.; Finkelstein, E. Experimental research on the relation between food price changes and food-purchasing patterns: A targeted review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 95, 789–809. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. EU. Certificates of Specific Character for Agricultural Products and Food Status; Official Journal of the European Union L 2082/1992; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 1992; pp. 9–14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. EU. Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 on Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs as Traditional Specialties Guaranteed; Official Journal of the European Union L 93/1; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. EU. Quality Schemes for Agricultural Products and Food Stuffs; Official Journal of the European Union L 1151/2012; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2012; pp. 31–59.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. FAO Q&A COVID-19 Pandemic—Impact on Food and Agriculture. Available online: https://www.fao.org/2019-ncov/q-and-a/ impact-on-food-and-agriculture/en/ (accessed on 15 October 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Farragher, T.; Wang, W.C.; Worsley, A. The associations of vegetable consumption with food mavenism, personal values, food knowledge and demographic factors. Appetite 2016, 97, 29–36. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Galanakis, C.M.; Rizou, M.; Aldawoud, T.M.S.; Ucak, I.; Rowan, N.J. Innovations and technology disruptions in the food sector within the COVID-19 pandemic and post-lockdown era. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 110, 193–200. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Garad, A.; Budiyanto, G.; Ansi, A.M.A.L. Impact of covid-19 pandemic on the global economy and future prospects: A systematic review of global reports. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2021, 99, 1–15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Giampietri, E.; Verneau, F.; del Giudice, T.; Carfora, V.; Finco, A. A Theory of Planned behaviour perspective for investigating the role of trust in consumer purchasing decision related to short food supply chains. Food Qual. Prefer. 2018, 64, 160–166. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Guerrero, L.; Guàrdia, M.D.; Xicola, J.; Verbeke, W.; Vanhonacker, F.; Zakowska-Biemans, S.; Sajdakowska, M.; Sulmont-Rossé, C.; Issanchou, S.; Contel, M.; et al. Consumer-driven definition of traditional food products and innovation in traditional foods. A qualitative cross-cultural study. Appetite 2009, 52, 345–354. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Guiné, R.P.; Florença, S.G.; Barroca, M.J.; Anjos, O. The duality of innovation and food development versus purely traditional foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 109, 16–24. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Hardiah, M.; Nabawiyah, H.; Pibriyanti, K. Correlation between Knowledge and Attitudes to the Behavior of Personal Hygiene Food Handlers in Nutrient Department. Sport Nutr. J. 2020, 2, 17–24. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Hellenic Ministry of Agricultural Development and Food. Greek Traditional Products (PDO-PGI-TSG). 2021. Available online: http://www.minagric.gr/index.php/el/for-farmer-2/2012-02-02-07-52-07 (accessed on 15 October 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Hoogland, C.T.; de Boer, J.; Boersema, J.J. Food and sustainability: Do consumers recognize, understand and value on-package information on production standards? Appetite 2007, 49, 47–57. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Horgen, K.B.; Brownell, K.D. Comparison of price change and health message interventions in promoting healthy food choices. Health Psychol. 2002, 21, 505–512. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Ismail, F.H.; Chik, C.T.; Muhammad, R.; Yusoff, N.M. Food Safety Knowledge and Personal Hygiene Practices amongst Mobile Food Handlers in Shah Alam, Selangor. Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 222, 290–298. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 12687 17 of 17
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Jin, S.; Zhou, L. Consumer interest in information provided by food traceability systems in Japan. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 36, 144–152. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Kavanaugh, M.; Quinlan, J.J. Consumer knowledge and behaviors regarding food date labels and food waste. Food Control. 2020, 115, 107285. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Koen, N.; Wentzel-Viljoen, E.; Blaauw, R. Price rather than nutrition information the main influencer of consumer food purchasing behaviour in South Africa: A qualitative study. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2018, 42, 409–418. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Koronios, K.; Kriemadis, A.; Dimitropoulos, P.; Papdopoulos, A. A values framework for measuring the influence of ethics and motivation regarding the performance of employees. Bus. Entrep. J. 2019, 8, 1–19.

  32. Kotler, P. The Consumer in the Age of Coronavirus. J. Creating Value 2020, 6, 12–15. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Lassoued, R.; Hobbs, J. Consumer confidence in credence attributes: The role of brand trust. Food Policy 2015, 52, 99–107. [CrossRef]

  34. Liao, P.-A.; Chang, H.-H.; Chang, C.-Y. Why is the food traceability system unsuccessful in Taiwan? Empirical evidence from a national survey of fruit and vegetable farmers. Food Policy 2011, 36, 686–693. [CrossRef]

  35. Likert, R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 1932, 140, 44–53.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Lim, K.H.; Hu, W.; Maynard, L.J.; Goddard, E.U.S. Consumers’ Preference and Willingness to Pay for Country-of-Origin-Labeled Beef Steak and Food Safety Enhancements. Can. J. Agric. Econ. Can. Agroecon. 2013, 61, 93–118. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Liu, R.; Gao, Z.; Nayga, R.M.; Snell, H.A.; Ma, H. Consumers’ valuation for food traceability in China: Does trust matter? Food Policy 2019, 88, 101768. [CrossRef]

  38. Lusk, J.L.; Tonsor, G.T.; Schroeder, T.C.; Hayes, D.J. Effect of government quality grade labels on consumer demand for pork chops in the short and long run. Food Policy 2018, 77, 91–102. [CrossRef]

  39. Matzembacher, D.E.; Stangherlin, I.D.C.; Slongo, L.A.; Cataldi, R. An integration of traceability elements and their impact in consumer’s trust. Food Control. 2018, 92, 420–429. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Miller, L.M.S.; Cassady, D.L.; Beckett, L.A.; Applegate, E.A.; Wilson, M.D.; Gibson, T.N.; Ellwood, K. Misunderstanding of Front-Of-Package Nutrition Information on US Food Products. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125306. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Montet, D.; Dey, G. History of Food Traceability: Analytical Techniques. In Food Traceability and Authenticity; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 1–30.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Mora, C.; Menozzi, D. Benefits of traceability in food markets: Consumers’ perception and action. Food Econ.—Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. C 2008, 5, 92–105. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Olsen, P.; Borit, M. How to define traceability. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 29, 142–150. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Opara, L.U.; Vol, E.; Opara, L.U.; Vol, E. Traceability in agriculture and food supply chain: A review of basic concepts, technological implications, and future prospects. Food Agric. Environ. 2003, 1, 101–106.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Pérez, L.P.Y.; Gracia, A.; Barreiro-Hurlé, J. Not Seeing the Forest for the Trees: The Impact of Multiple Labelling on Consumer Choices for Olive Oil. Foods 2020, 9, 186. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  46. Palmieri, N.; Perito, M. Consumers’ Willingness to Consume Sustainable and Local Wine in Italy. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2020, 32, 222–233.

  47. Palmieri, N.; Perito, M.A.; Lupi, C. Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: Some hints from Italy. Br. Food J. 2020, 123, 109–123. [CrossRef]

  48. Palmieri, N.; Perito, M.A.; Macrì, M.C.; Lupi, C. Exploring consumers’ willingness to eat insects in Italy. Br. Food J. 2019, 121, 2937–2950. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Palmieri, N.; Suardi, A.; Pari, L. Italian Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Eucalyptus Firewood. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2629. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Pappalardo, G.; Lusk, J.L. The role of beliefs in purchasing process of functional foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2016, 53, 151–158. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Patidar, A.; Sharma, M.; Agrawal, R. Prioritizing drivers to creating traceability in the food supply chain. Procedia CIRP 2021, 98, 690–695. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  52. Pekkirbizli, T.; Almadani, M.I.; Theuvsen, L. Food safety and quality assurance systems in Turkish agribusiness: An empirical analysis of determinants of adoption. Econ. Agro-Aliment. 2015, 17, 31–55. [CrossRef]

  53. Petrescu-Mag, R.; Vermeir, I.; Petrescu, D.; Crista, F.; Banatean-Dunea, I. Traditional Foods at the Click of a Button: The Preference for the Online Purchase of Romanian Traditional Foods during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9956. [CrossRef]

  54. Pieniak, Z.; Verbeke, W.; Vanhonacker, F.; Guerrero, L.; Hersleth, M. Association between traditional food consumption and motives for food choice in six European countries. Appetite 2009, 53, 101–108. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Rahman, A.; Tosepu, R.; Karimuna, S.R.; Yusran, S.; Zainuddin, A.; Junaid, J. Personal Hygiene, Sanitation and Food Safety Knowledge of Food Workers at the University Canteen in Indonesia. Public Health Indones. 2018, 4, 154–161. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  56. Rimpeekool, W.; Seubsman, S.-A.; Banwell, C.; Kirk, M.; Yiengprugsawan, V.; Sleigh, A. Food and nutrition labelling in Thailand: A long march from subsistence producers to international traders. Food Policy 2015, 56, 59–66. [CrossRef]

  57. Russo, C.; Simeone, M.; Demartini, E.; Marescotti, M.E.; Gaviglio, A. Psychological pressure and changes in food consumption: The effect of COVID-19 crisis. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06607. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Sadílek, T. Consumer preferences regarding food quality labels: The case of Czechia. Br. Food J. 2019, 121, 2508–2523. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Serrano-Cruz, M.R.; Espinoza-Ortega, A.; Sepúlveda, W.S.; Vizcarra-Bordi, I.; Thomé-Ortiz, H. Factors associated with the consumption of traditional foods in central Mexico. Br. Food J. 2018, 120, 2695–2709. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Skalkos, D. Traditional Foods in Europe: Perceptions & Prospects in the New Business Era. Mod. Concepts Dev. Agron. 2021, 8, 787–789. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Skalkos, D.; Kosma, I.; Chasioti, E.; Skendi, A.; Papageorgiou, M.; Guiné, R. Consumers’ Attitude and Perception toward Traditional Foods of Northwest Greece during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4080. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 12687 16 of 17
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  62. Skalkos, D.; Kosma, I.S.; Vasiliou, A.; Guine, R.P.F. Consumers’ Trust in Greek Traditional Foods in the Post COVID-19 Era. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9975. [CrossRef]

  63. Thow, A.M.; Downs, S.; Jan, S. A systematic review of the effectiveness of food taxes and subsidies to improve diets: Understanding the recent evidence. Nutr. Rev. 2014, 72, 551–565. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Trichopoulou, A.; Soukara, S.; Vasilopoulou, E. Traditional foods: A science and society perspective. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 18, 420–427. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  65. Van Loo, E.J.; Caputo, V.; Nayga, R.M.; Seo, H.-S.; Zhang, B.; Verbeke, W. Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 118, 215–225. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 12687 15 of 17

  66. Van Loo, E.J.; Minnens, F.; Verbeke, W. Consumer Preferences for Private Label Brand vs. National Brand Organic Juice and Eggs: A Latent Class Approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7028. [CrossRef]

  67. Van Rijswijk, W.; Frewer, L.J. Consumer perceptions of food quality and safety and their relation to traceability. Br. Food J. 2008, 110, 1034–1046. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Van Rijswijk, W.; Frewer, L.J.; Menozzi, D.; Faioli, G. Consumer perceptions of traceability: A cross-national comparison of the associated benefits. Food Qual. Prefer. 2008, 19, 452–464. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Verbeke, W.; Guerrero, L.; Almli, V.L.; Vanhonacker, F.; Hersleth, M. European Consumers’ Definition and Perception of Traditional Foods. In Traditional Foods; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 3–16. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  70. Walaszczyk, A.; Galińska, B. Food Origin Traceability from a Consumer’s Perspective. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1872. [CrossRef]

  71. Wongprawmas, R.; Bravo, C.A.P.; Lazo, A.; Canavari, M.; Spiller, A. Practitioners’ perceptions of the credibility of food quality assurance schemes: Exploring the effect of country of origin. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crop. Foods 2015, 7, 789–799. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  72. Wongprawmas, R.; Canavari, M. Consumers’ willingness-to-pay for food safety labels in an emerging market: The case of fresh produce in Thailand. Food Policy 2017, 69, 25–34. [CrossRef]

  73. Wu, L.; Wang, S.; Zhu, D.; Hu, W.; Wang, H. Chinese consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for traceable food quality and safety attributes: The case of pork. China Econ. Rev. 2015, 35, 121–136. [CrossRef]

  74. Xu, L.; Yang, X.; Wu, L.; Chen, X.; Chen, L.; Tsai, F.S. Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3616. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  75. Yang, Y.; Hobbs, J.E.; Natcher, D.C. Assessing consumer willingness to pay for Arctic food products. Food Policy 2020, 92, 101846. [CrossRef]

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Consumers bahavior towards the country of origin labeling policy: The case of the pasta market in Italy. (2024). Boncinelli, Fabio ; Bondioni, Federico ; Marone, Enrico ; Dominici, Andrea.
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:40:y:2024:i:1:p:46-69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Explaining consumer willingness to pay for country‐of‐origin labeling with ethnocentrism, country image, and product image: Examples from Chinas beef market. (2024). DeLong, Karen ; Gao, Shijun ; Grebitus, Carola.
    In: Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie.
    RePEc:bla:canjag:v:72:y:2024:i:2:p:149-166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Consumer willingness to pay for production attributes of cotton apparel. (2023). Hudson, Darren ; Boufous, Sawssan ; Carpio, Carlos.
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:39:y:2023:i:4:p:1026-1048.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Experimental quantity, mental budgeting and food choice: a discrete choice experiment application. (2023). Ortega, David ; Caputo, Vincenzina ; Lin, Wen.
    In: European Review of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:oup:erevae:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:457-496..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. How does origin labelling on food packaging influence consumer product evaluation and choices? A systematic literature review. (2023). Thogersen, John.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:119:y:2023:i:c:s030691922300101x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Consumer preferences for country of origin labeling: Bridging the gap between research estimates and real-world behavior. (2023). Kassas, Bachir ; House, Lisa ; Gao, Zhifeng ; Guan, Zhengfei ; Cao, Xiang.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:48:y:2023:i:c:s1755534523000301.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. A meta‐regression analysis on the willingness‐to‐pay for country‐of‐origin labelling. (2023). Hirsch, Stefan ; Yeh, Chinghua.
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:74:y:2023:i:3:p:719-743.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Consumer preferences for wild game meat: evidence from a hybrid choice model on wild boar meat in Italy. (2022). Fantechi, Tommaso ; Casini, Leonardo ; Scozzafava, Gabriele ; Contini, Caterina.
    In: Agricultural and Food Economics.
    RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:10:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-022-00231-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Sustainable food: Can information from food labels make consumers switch to meat substitutes?. (2022). Lampi, Elina ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Kataria, Mitesh.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:201:y:2022:i:c:s0921800922002294.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Consumer Preferences for Chlorine Washed Chicken, Attitudes to Brexit and Trade Agreements. (2021). Fraser, Iain ; Balcombe, Kelvin ; Bradley, Dylan.
    In: Studies in Economics.
    RePEc:ukc:ukcedp:2112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Consumers’ Perception on Traceability of Greek Traditional Foods in the Post-COVID-19 Era. (2021). Bintsis, Thomas ; Kosma, Ioanna S ; Karantonis, Haralabos C ; Chasioti, Eleni ; Skalkos, Dimitris.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12687-:d:680562.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. How to Improve Food Quality in the Domestic Market: The Role of “Same Line Same Standard Same Quality”—Evidence from a Consumer Choice Experiment in China. (2021). Zhu, Zhanguo ; Zhang, Tong ; Bai, Lin.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5709-:d:557967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Preference stability in discrete choice experiments. Some evidence using eye-tracking. (2021). Fraser, Iain ; Balcombe, Kelvin ; Williams, Louis ; McSorley, Eugene.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:94:y:2021:i:c:s2214804321000938.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Is there hope for domestically produced poultry meat? A choice experiment of consumers in Ghana. (2020). Weible, Daniela ; Asanteaddo, Collins.
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:36:y:2020:i:2:p:281-298.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The Economic Analysis of Consumer Attitudes Towards Food Produced Using Prohibited Production Methods: Do Consumers Really Care?. (2020). Fraser, Iain ; Balcombe, Kelvin ; Bradley, Dylan.
    In: Studies in Economics.
    RePEc:ukc:ukcedp:2004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Consumer Willingness To Pay for Proenvironmental Attributes of Biogas Digestate-Based Potting Soil. (2020). Kurz, Peter ; Dahlin, Johannes ; Herbes, Carsten.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6405-:d:396589.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Consumer Assessment of Sustainability Traits in Meat Production. A Choice Experiment Study in Spain. (2020). Escribano, Miguel ; Mesias, Francisco J ; Eldesouky, Ali.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4093-:d:359275.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Assessing consumer willingness to pay for Arctic food products. (2020). Hobbs, Jill ; Yang, Yang ; Natcher, David C.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:92:y:2020:i:c:s0306919220300300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Consumer Preferences for Country‐of‐Origin Labeling in Protected Markets: Evidence from the Canadian Dairy Market. (2019). Cranfield, John ; Norris, Amanda.
    In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
    RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:41:y:2019:i:3:p:391-403.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Using behavioural experiments to pre-test policy. (2018). Keane, Claire ; Regan, Mark ; Walsh, John R.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:esr:wpaper:bp2019/2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Are preferences for food quality attributes really normally distributed? An analysis using flexible mixing distributions. (2018). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Ortega, David ; Nayga, Rodolfo ; Caputo, Vincenzina.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:28:y:2018:i:c:p:10-27.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Consumer preference for infant milk‐based formula with select food safety information attributes: Evidence from a choice experiment in China. (2018). Chen, Yusheng ; Yin, Shijiu ; Lv, Shanshan ; Wu, Linhai ; Yan, Jiang.
    In: Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie.
    RePEc:bla:canjag:v:66:y:2018:i:4:p:557-569.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Economic Integration Reconsidered. (2018). Larue, Bruno.
    In: Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie.
    RePEc:bla:canjag:v:66:y:2018:i:1:p:5-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The Willingness to Pay for Organic Attributes in the UK. (2017). Gschwandtner, Adelina ; burton, michael.
    In: Studies in Economics.
    RePEc:ukc:ukcedp:1702.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Examining the relationship between visual attention and stated preferences: A discrete choice experiment using eye-tracking. (2017). Fraser, Iain ; Balcombe, Kelvin ; Williams, Louis ; McSorley, Eugene.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:144:y:2017:i:c:p:238-257.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The Willingness to Pay for Organic Attributes in the UK. (2017). Gschwandtner, Adelina ; burton, michael.
    In: 91st Annual Conference, April 24-26, 2017, Royal Dublin Society, Dublin, Ireland.
    RePEc:ags:aesc17:258644.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-02 22:08:02 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.