create a website

Development of Rural Areas in Ukraine in the Context of Decentralization: An Empirical Study. (2022). Boiko, Svitlana ; Wasilewska, Natalia ; Davydenko, Nadiia ; Wasilewski, Mirosaw.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6730-:d:829042.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 73

References cited by this document

Cocites: 28

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Decentralization Policies and Rural Socio-Economic Growth in Senegal: An Exploration of Their Contributions to Development and Transformation. (2024). Faye, Bonoua ; Dine, Jeanne Colette ; Liang, Changan ; Kouadio, Yao Dinard ; Mbaye, Edme ; Du, Guoming.
    In: World.
    RePEc:gam:jworld:v:5:y:2024:i:4:p:53-1076:d:1513405.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Ukraine’s rural areas in the conditions of decentralization and local self-government reform: challenges and prospects. (2023). Khirivskyi, Roman ; Patyka, Nataliia ; Sysoieva, Inna ; Movchaniuk, Anastasiia ; Sokolova, Alla.
    In: Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal.
    RePEc:ags:areint:341538.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alonso, G.C.; Masot, N.A. Rural space governance in Extremadura (SW Spain): Analysis of the Leader Approach. Eur. Countrys. 2020, 12, 448–468. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Armstrong, J.S.; Adya, M.; Collopy, F. Rule-Based Forecasting: Using Judgment in Time-Series Extrapolation. In Principles of Forecasting; A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners; Kluwer: Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands, 2001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Banakar, V.; Patil, S.V. A Conceptual Model of Rural Development Index. Int. J. Hortic. Agric. Food Sci. 2018, 2, 29–38. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Baskaran, T.; Feld, T.P. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: Is there a Relationship. Public Financ. Rev. 2012, 41, 421–445. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Belei, S. Development of Rural Areas in Conditions of Decentralization. Ef. Ekon. 2021, 1. Available online: http://www.economy. nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=8503 (accessed on 16 May 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Boiko, S.V.; Shirinyan, L.V. Horizontal equalization of regional budgets in the system of interbudget financial provision of regions of Ukraine. Econ. Horiz. 2018, 3, 65–77. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Bojanic, A.N. The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Accountability, Economic Freedom, and Political and Civil Liberties in the Americas. Economies 2018, 6, 8. [CrossRef]

  8. Bojanic, A.N. The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Growth, Inflation, and Inequality in the Americas. Cepal. Rev. 2018, 124, 57–77. [CrossRef]

  9. Britchenko, I.; Bezpartochnyi, M.; Maslii, N. Financial decentralization in Ukraine: Prerequisites, problems, prospects. VUZF Rev. 2019, 4, 25–44. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2022, 14, 6730 26 of 26
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Cadoná, L.A.; Umburanas, R.C.; Junior, P.A.V.; Dourado Neto, D. Sustainable Rural Development Index. World Economics Association (WEA) Conferences, No. 2 2016, Food and Justice, 5 November–15 December 2016. Available online: https: //foodandjustice2016.weaconferences.net/papers/sustainable-rural-development-index/ (accessed on 11 March 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Chen, X.; Liu, J. Fiscal Decentralization and Environmental Pollution: A Spatial Analysis. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2020, 2020, 9254150. [CrossRef]

  12. Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Song, Y.; Liang, X.; Wang, L.; Geng, Y. Fiscal Decentralization, Urban-Rural Income Gap, and Tourism. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10398. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Churski, P.; Herodowicz, T.; Konecka-Szydłowska, B.; Perdał, R. Spatial Differentiation of the Socio-Economic Development of Poland–“Invisible” Historical Heritage. Land 2021, 10, 1247. [CrossRef]

  14. Davoodi, H.; Zou, H. Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross-country study. J. Urban Econ. 1998, 43, 244–257. [CrossRef]

  15. Davydenko, N.; Boiko, S.; Buriak, A.; Demianenko, I. Development of rural areas through fiscal decentralization. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference “Economic science for rural development”, Jelgava, Latvia, 11–14 May 2021; pp. 102–114. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. Digdowiseiso, K. Is Fiscal Decentralization Growth Enhancing? A Cross-Country Study in Developing Countries over the Period 1990–2014. Economies 2022, 10, 62. [CrossRef]

  17. Digdowiseiso, K.; Murshed, S.M.; Bergh, S.I. How Effective is fiscal decentralization for inequality reduction in developing countries? Sustainability 2022, 14, 505. [CrossRef]

  18. Dmytryshyn, M.; Dmytryshyn, R.; Yakubiv, V.; Zagorodnyuk, A. Peculiarities of Ukrainians’ Approval of Decentralization Reform. Adm. Sci. 2021, 11, 104. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Dubnevych, Y.; Dubnevych, N.; Dorosh, U. Social and economic development of rural areas under conditions of decentralization. Agric. Econ. 2019, 1–2, 25–31. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Dyakonenko, O.I. Influence of financial decentralization on development of rural settlements in Ukraine. Demogr. Soc. Econ. 2018, 3, 161–174. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Dziekański, P.; Prus, P. Financial Diversity and the Development Process: Case study of Rural Communes of Eastern Poland in 2009–2018. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6446. [CrossRef]

  22. European Commission. The LEADER Approach. A Basic Guide, 2006. ENRD Home Page. The European Network for Rural Development (ENRD). Available online: https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fms/pdf/2B953E0A-9045-2198-8B09ED2F3D2CCED3. pdf (accessed on 31 May 2008).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Ezcurra, R.; Pascual, P. Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: Evidence from several European Union countries. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 2008, 40, 1185–1201. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Faguet, J.P.; Sanchez, F. Decentralization and access to social services in Colombia. Public Choice 2014, 160, 227–249. [CrossRef]

  25. Filippetti, A.; Agnese, S. Decentralization and economic growth reconsidered: The role of regional authority. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 2016, 34, 1793–1824. [CrossRef]

  26. Fisman, R.; Gatti, R. Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries. J. Public Econ. 2002, 83, 325–345. [CrossRef]

  27. Gajić, A.; Krunić, N.; Protić, B. Classification of Rural Areas in Serbia: Framework and Implications for Spatial Planning. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1596. [CrossRef]

  28. Gargano, G. The Bottom-Up Development Model as a Governance Instrument for the Rural Areas. The Cases of Four Local Action Groups (LAGs) in the United Kingdom and in Italy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9123. [CrossRef]

  29. Gemmel, N.; Kneller, R.; Sanz, I. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: Spending versus Revenue Decentralization. Econ. Inq. 2013, 51, 1915–1931. [CrossRef]

  30. Guo, S.; Wen, L.; Wu, Y.; Yue, X.; Fan, G. Fiscal Decentralization and Local Environmental Pollution in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8661. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Hashemi, N.; Ghaffarv, G. A proposed Sustainable Rural Development Index: Lessons from Hajij village, Iran. Tour. Manag. 2017, 59, 130–138. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2022, 14, 6730 25 of 26
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Hennebry, B.; Stryjakiewicz, T. Classification of Structurally Weak Rural Regions: Application of a Rural Development Index for Austria and Portugal. Quaest. Geogr. 2020, 39, 5–14. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Hotra, V.V.; Kovach, A.Y. The influence of the decentralization process on the development of rural areas. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Ser. Econ. 2021, 1, 30–37. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  34. Huynh, C.M.; Tran, H.N. Moderating effects of corruption and informality on the fiscal decentralization-economic growth nexus: Insights from OECD countries. Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 2021, 92, 355–373. [CrossRef]

  35. Iimi, A. Decentralization and economic growth revisited: An empirical note. J. Urban Econ. 2005, 57, 449–461. [CrossRef]

  36. Jiang, L.; Luo, J.; Zhang, C.; Tian, L.; Liu, Q.; Chen, G.; Tian, Y. Study on the Level and Type Identification of Rural Development in Wuhan City’s New Urban Districts. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 172. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Jurjević, Ž.; Zekić, S.; Ðokić, D.; Matkovski, B. Regional Spatial Approach to Differences in Rural Economic Development: Insights from Serbia. Land 2021, 10, 1211. [CrossRef]

  38. Karanikolas, P.; Hatzipanteli, S. The Decentralization Process of Rural Development Policy in Greece. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2008, 18, 411–434. [CrossRef]

  39. Khomiuk, N.; Bochko, O.; Pavlikha, N.; Demchuk, A.; Stashchuk, O.; Shmatkovska, T.; Naumenko, N. Economic modeling of sustainable rural development under the conditions of decentralization: A case study of Ukraine. Sci. Pap. Ser. Manag. Econ. Eng. Agric. Rural Dev. 2020, 20, 317–332.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Kvålseth, T.O. Coefficient of Variation: The Second-Order Alternative. J. Appl. Stat. 2016, 44, 402–415. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Kyriacou, A.P.; Roca-Sagalés, O. Fiscal and political decentralization and government quality. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 2011, 29, 204–223. [CrossRef]

  42. Lessmann, C. Fiscal decentralization and regional disparity: Evidence from cross-section and panel data. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 2009, 41, 2455–2473. [CrossRef]

  43. Letelier, S.L.E.; Sáez-Lozano, J.L. Expenditure Decentralization: Does It Make Us Happier? An Empirical Analysis Using a Panel of Countries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7236. [CrossRef]

  44. Lu, S.; Wang, H. Limited Decentralization: Understand China’s Land System from the Perspective of Central-Local Relation. Land 2022, 11, 517. [CrossRef]

  45. Maro, P.S. The impact of decentralization on spatial equity and rural development in Tanzania. World Dev. 1990, 18, 673–693. [CrossRef]

  46. Michalek, J.; Zarnekow, N. Application of the Rural Development Index to Analysis of Rural Regions in Poland and Slovakia. Soc. Indic. Res. 2012, 105, 1–37. [CrossRef]

  47. Navarro, F.; Labianca, M.; Cejudo, E.; De Rubertis, S.; Salento, A.; Maroto, J.; Belliggiano, A. Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period. Eur. Countrys. 2018, 10, 107–126. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Olar, A.; Jitea, M.I. Counterbalancing the Development Territorial Disparities in the Implementation of the CommunityLed Local Development EU Approach in Romania. Land 2021, 10, 970. [CrossRef]

  49. Oliynyk-Dunn, O.M.; Wasilewski, M.; Wasilewska, N.; Okhrimenko, I.; Adamenko, V. Transformation of the financing patterns of agricultural enterprises in the conditions of the financial system crisis: A case of Ukraine and the USA. Econ. Ann.-Xxi 2020, 182, 77–89. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Parker, A.N. Decentralization: The Way forward for Rural Development? World Bank, Agriculture and Natural Resources Department, Sector Policy and Water Resources Division: Washington, DC, USA, 1995; p. 52.

  51. Patyka, N.; Gryschenko, O.; Kucher, A.; Hełdak, M.; Raszka, B. Assessment of the Degree of Factors Impact on Employment in Ukraine’s Agriculture. Sustainability 2021, 13, 564. [CrossRef]

  52. Pawlik, A.; Dziekański, P.; Przybytniowski, J.W. Influence of Financial Variables on the Development of Rural Communes of Eastern Poland in 2009–2018. Risks 2021, 9, 145. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. Rodríguez-Pose, A.; Ezcurra, R. Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis. J. Econ. Geogr. 2010, 10, 619–644. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6730 24 of 26

  54. Sakal, O.; Kovalenko, A.; Tretiak, R.; Tretiak, N. Results of the decentralization reform in Ukraine: Land use. Scientific Papers Series Management. Econ. Eng. Agric. Rural. Dev. 2019, 19, 511–516.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  55. Salmon, P. Decentralizations as an Incentive Scheme. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 1987, 3, 24–43. [CrossRef]

  56. Shcherbak, V.; Ganushchak-Yefimenko, L.; Nifatova, O.; Fastovets, N.; Plysenko, H.; Lutay, L.; Tkachuk, V.; Ptashchenko, O. Use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areas. Glob. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 2020, 6, 175–190. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Demographic Yearbook “Population of Ukraine”. Available online: http://www.ukrstat.gov. ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2021/zb/10/dem_2020.pdf (accessed on 13 February 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Statistical publication “Gross regional product”. Available online: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ druk/publicat/Arhiv_u/03/Arch_vrp.htm (accessed on 13 February 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Statistical Publication “Preschool education in Ukraine”. Available online: http://www. ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/publosvita_u.htm (accessed on 13 February 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Statistical Publication “Regions of Ukraine”. Available online: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ druk/publicat/Arhiv_u/Arch_reg.htm (accessed on 13 February 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine. Available online: http://ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_ u/2021/zb/11/Yearbook_2020_e.pdf (accessed on 13 February 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Storonyanska, I.; Hrynchyshyn, I.; Dub, A.; Horga, I. Fiscal decentralization in Europe in the context of social protection development. Econ. Ann. 2019, 175, 24–28. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  63. Sujarwoto, S.; Tampubolon, G. Decentralisation and Citizen Happiness: A Multilevel Analysis of Self-rated Happiness in Indonesia. J. Happiness Stud. 2015, 16, 455–475. [CrossRef]

  64. Tae-Hwa, K.; Seung-Ryong, Y. Construction Of The Rural Development Index: The Case Of Vietnam. J. Rural. Dev. /NongchonGyeongje Ang 2016, 39, 113–142. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Titenko, Z. Budgetary decentralization as a factor for the rural development of rural areas of Ukraine. Agrosvit 2020, 7, 87–91. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  66. Tselios, V.; Rodríguez-Pose, A. Did Decentralisation Affect Citizens’ Perception of the European Union? The Impact during the Height of Decentralisation in Europe. Economies 2020, 8, 38. [CrossRef]

  67. Tselios, V.; Rodríguez-Pose, A.; Pike, A.; Tomaney, J.; Torrisi, G. Income inequality, decentralization and regional development in Western Europe. Environ. Plan. 2012, 44, 1278–1301. [CrossRef]

  68. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. About Modification of the Budget Code of Ukraine Concerning Reform of Interbudgetary Relations on 28 December 28 2014. No. 79-VIII. Available online: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-17?lang=en#Text (accessed on 13 February 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Budget Code of Ukraine on 8 July 2010. No. 2456-VI. Available online: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/79-19#Text (accessed on 13 February 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska, A. The importance of the leader programme 2007–2013 in the rural areas development in Poland. Res. Rural Dev. 2017, 2, 97–103.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Zekic, S.; Kleut, Z.; Matkovski, B. An analysis of key indicators of rural development in Serbia: A comparison with EU countries. Econ. Ann. 2017, 214, 107–120. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Zhou, C.; Zhang, X. Measuring the Efficiency of Fiscal Policies for Environmental Pollution Control and the Spatial Effect of Fiscal Decentralization in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8974. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  73. Zhu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Li, J.; Wang, F. Technological Innovation, Fiscal Decentralization, Green Development Efficiency: Based on Spatial Effect and Moderating Effect. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4316. [CrossRef]

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Do ICT trade balances and natural resources foster carbon emissions? The role of government effectiveness and green technology innovation. (2025). Shahzad, Farrukh ; Quddus, Abdul ; Irfan, Muhammad ; Wang, Yanfei.
    In: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.
    RePEc:eee:streco:v:72:y:2025:i:c:p:320-329.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Decentralization and rural–urban income inequality: implications for inverted-U hypothesis of Pakistan. (2024). Shahid, Muhammad ; Ahmad, Khalil ; Haider, Ayesha ; Ali, Safdar.
    In: Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review.
    RePEc:spr:eaiere:v:21:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s40844-024-00285-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Governance and Fiscal Decentralisation in Latin America: An Empirical Approach. (2024). Pinilla-Rodríguez, Diego ; Hernandez-Medina, Patricia ; Pinilla-Rodriguez, Diego E.
    In: Economies.
    RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:8:p:207-:d:1459289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Impact of fiscal decentralisation on economic growth in Vietnam—A spatial regression approach. (2024). Kim, Tran Thi.
    In: Australian Economic Papers.
    RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:63:y:2024:i:2:p:258-282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Revisiting the nexus between fiscal decentralization and CO2 emissions in South Africa: fresh policy insights. (2023). Breitenbach, Marthinus ; Udeagha, Maxwell Chukwudi.
    In: Financial Innovation.
    RePEc:spr:fininn:v:9:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-023-00453-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Effect mechanism of Chinese-style decentralization on regional carbon emissions and policy improvement: evidence from China’s 12 urban agglomerations. (2023). Li, Xiaoyan ; Xu, Hengzhou.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-021-02063-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The Role of Fiscal Decentralization in Limiting CO2 Emissions in South Africa. (2023). Breitenbach, Marthinus ; Udeagha, Maxwell Chukwudi.
    In: Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality.
    RePEc:spr:bioerq:v:8:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s41247-023-00112-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Environmental impact of fiscal decentralization, green technology innovation and institution€™s efficiency in developed countries using advance panel modelling. (2023). Rani, Tayyaba ; Wang, Feng ; Razzaq, Asif.
    In: Energy & Environment.
    RePEc:sae:engenv:v:34:y:2023:i:4:p:1006-1030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Can the Digitalization Reduce Carbon Emission Intensity?—The Moderating Effects of the Fiscal Decentralization. (2023). Yang, Zhao.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9006-:d:1162713.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. How does fiscal decentralization lead to renewable energy transition and a sustainable environment? Evidence from highly decentralized economies. (2023). Sun, Yunpeng ; Gao, Pengpeng ; Razzaq, Asif.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:206:y:2023:i:c:p:1064-1074.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Fiscal Federalism and Economic Development in Nigeria: An Econometric Analysis. (2023). Otto, Godly ; Nkoro, Emeka.
    In: International Journal of Economic Sciences.
    RePEc:aop:jijoes:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:144-162.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Fiscal Federalism and Economic Development in Nigeria: An Econometric Analysis. (2023). Otto, Godly ; Nkoro, Emeka.
    In: International Journal of Economic Sciences.
    RePEc:aop:jijoes:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:127-145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Asymmetric impact of fiscal decentralization and environmental innovation on carbon emissions: Evidence from highly decentralized countries. (2022). Yan, Mengling ; Hassan, Marria ; Malik, Haider Ali ; Razzaq, Asif ; Zhao, ZE.
    In: Energy & Environment.
    RePEc:sae:engenv:v:33:y:2022:i:4:p:752-782.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Fiscal Decentralization, Good Governance and Regional Development—Empirical Evidence in the European Context. (2022). Anton, Sorin Gabriel ; Onofrei, Mihaela ; Cojocariu, Lenua ; Oprea, Florin ; Iau, Corneliu.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7093-:d:835128.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Development of Rural Areas in Ukraine in the Context of Decentralization: An Empirical Study. (2022). Boiko, Svitlana ; Wasilewska, Natalia ; Davydenko, Nadiia ; Wasilewski, Mirosaw.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6730-:d:829042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Exploring the asymmetric impact of economic policy uncertainty on Chinas carbon emissions trading market price: Do different types of uncertainty matter?. (2022). Li, Zheng ; Shao, Xuefeng ; Umar, Muhammad ; Su, Chi-Wei.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:178:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522001330.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Influence of fiscal decentralization and renewable energy investment on ecological sustainability in EU: What is the moderating role of institutional governance?. (2022). Feng, Jue ; Zhai, GE ; Liu, Fengyu ; Razzaq, Asif.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:200:y:2022:i:c:p:1265-1274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Transition towards ecological sustainability through fiscal decentralization, renewable energy and green investment in OECD countries. (2022). Sun, Yunpeng ; Guan, Weimin ; Shahzad, Mohsin ; Razzaq, Asif.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:190:y:2022:i:c:p:385-395.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Does composite fiscal decentralization reduce trade-adjusted resource consumption through institutional governance, human capital, and infrastructure development?. (2022). Shao, Shuai ; Razzaq, Asif.
    In: Resources Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:79:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722004779.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Differential effects of decentralization on income inequality: evidence from developed and developing countries. (2021). Collins, LaPorchia ; Bojanic, Antonio.
    In: Empirical Economics.
    RePEc:spr:empeco:v:60:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s00181-019-01813-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Decentralized Economic Complexity in Switzerland and Its Contribution to Inclusive and Sustainable Change. (2021). Aerni, Philipp.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4181-:d:532807.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The role of energy prices and non-linear fiscal decentralization in limiting carbon emissions: Tracking environmental sustainability. (2021). Kirikkaleli, Dervis ; Adebayo, Tomiwa ; Shan, Shan ; Yi, Rita ; Ahmad, Munir ; Tan, Zhixiong.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:234:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221014912.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The structural changes in Armenian Community budgets within the process of community consolidation. (2021). Yeranosyan, Vanine A ; Karapetyan, Tsovinar J ; Grigoryan, Erik M ; Muradyan, Arpenik.
    In: Regional Science Policy & Practice.
    RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:559-572.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Moderating effects of corruption and informality on the fiscal decentralization—economic growth nexus: Insights from OECD countries. (2021). Huynh, Cong Minh ; Tran, Hoai Nam.
    In: Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics.
    RePEc:bla:annpce:v:92:y:2021:i:2:p:355-373.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Fiscal Decentralization and Gender Equality in Developing Economies: Dynamics of Income Groups in Economies and Corruption. (2021). Naeem, Sidra ; Ali, Rana Ejaz.
    In: Asian Economic and Financial Review.
    RePEc:asi:aeafrj:2021:p:745-761.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Economic Growth by Means of Fiscal Decentralization: An Empirical Study for Federal Developing Countries. (2020). Hanif, Imran ; Wallace, Sally ; Gago-De, Pilar.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:2158244020968088.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Accountability, Economic Freedom, and Political and Civil Liberties in the Americas. (2018). Bojanic, Antonio.
    In: Economies.
    RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:8-:d:129749.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Industrial development in decentralized conditions: experience of leading industrial countries and conclusions for Ukraine. (2018). Shovkun, I.
    In: Economy and Forecasting.
    RePEc:eip:journl:y:2018:i:4:p:38-64.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 22:05:08 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.