This document has not been cited yet.

1. American Association of University Women. Separated by Sex: Title IX and Single-Sex Education; AAUW Public Policy and Government Relations Department: Boston, MA, USA, 2009.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Australian Department of Industry, Science and Resources. Advancing Women in STEM Strategy; 2019. Available online: https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/advancing-women-in-stem-strategy (accessed on 23 February 2022).
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Bandura, A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control; Freeman: New York, NY, USA, 1997.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Barth, J.M.; Masters, S.L.; Parker, J.G. Gender stereotypes and belonging across high school girls’ social groups: Beyond the STEM classroom. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 2022, 25, 275–292. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Daniela, L.; Strods, R.; Alimisis, D. Analysis of robotics-based learning interventions for preventing school failure and early school leaving in gender context. In Proceedings of the EDULEARN17: 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Barcelona, Spain, 3–5 July 2017; IATED: Valencia, Spain, 2017; pp. 810–818.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Dixon, T.L. Network news and racial beliefs: Exploring the connection between national television news exposure and stereotypical perceptions of African Americans. J. Commun. 2008, 58, 321–337. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Fabes, R.A.; Martin, C.L.; Hanish, L.D. Gender integration and the promotion of inclusive classroom climates. Educ. Psychol. 2019, 54, 271–285. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Fleer, M. When preschool girls engineer: Future imaginings of being and becoming an engineer. Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact. 2021, 30 Pt B, 100372. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Grossman, J.M.; Porche, M.V. Perceived gender and racial/ethnic barriers to STEM success. Urban Educ. 2014, 49, 698–727. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Gunderson, E.A.; Ramirez, G.; Levine, S.C.; Beilock, S.L. The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles 2012, 66, 153–166. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Hannover, B.; Kessels, U. Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Why high school students do not like math and science. Learn. Instr. 2004, 14, 51–67. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. Hansen, M.; Gonzalez, T. Investigating the relationship between STEM learning principles and student achievement in math and science. Am. J. Educ. 2014, 120, 139–171. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Inzlicht, M.; Ben-Zeev, T. A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychol. Sci. 2000, 11, 365–371. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Jia, N. Do stricter high school math requirements raise college STEM attainment? Econ. Educ. Rev. 2021, 83, 102140. [CrossRef]

15. Kessels, U. Fitting into the stereotype: How gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypic peers relate to liking for school subjects. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2005, 20, 309–323. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Leaper, C.; Brown, C.S. Perceived experiences with sexism among adolescent girls. Child Dev. 2008, 79, 685–704. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Lubinski, D.; Benbow, C.P. Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 1, 316–345. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Midgette, A.J.; Mulvey, K.L. Unpacking young adults’ experiences of race-and gender-based microaggressions. J. Soc. Pers. Relatsh. 2021, 38, 1350–1370. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Moroz, S. Microaggressions: Gender and microaggressions. In WWEST’s Gender Diversity in STEM: A Briefing on Women in Science and Engineering; Parker, R., Pelletier, J., Croft, E., Eds.; University of British Columbia: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Mulvey, K.L.; Killen, M. Challenging gender stereotypes: Resistance and exclusion. Child Dev. 2015, 86, 681–694. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics. 2017. Available online: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/ digest/2017menu_tables.asp (accessed on 11 March 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Neuville, E.; Croizet, J.-C. Can salience of gender identity impair math performance among 7–8 years old girls? The moderating role of task difficulty. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2007, 22, 307–316. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Ogle, J.P.; Hyllegard, K.H.; Rambo-Hernandez, K.; Park, J. Building middle school girls’ self-efficacy, knowledge, and interest in math and science through the integration of fashion and STEM. J. Fam. Consum. Sci. 2017, 109, 33–40. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Parker, C. Reflections of eight Latinas and the role of language in the middle school science classroom. In Girls and Women in STEM: A Never Ending Story; Koch, J., Polnick, B., Irby, B., Eds.; Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC, USA, 2014; pp. 39–52. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14598 15 of 15
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Pierce, C. Offensive mechanisms. In The Black Seventies; Barbour, F.B., Ed.; Porter Sargent: Boston, MA, USA, 1970; pp. 265–282.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. Rittmayer, A.D.; Beier, M.E. Overview: Self-efficacy in STEM. SWE-AWE CASEE Overv. 2008, 1, 12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. Rogers, A.A.; Boyack, M.; Cook, R.E.; Allen, E. School connectedness and STEM orientation in adolescent girls: The role of perceived gender discrimination and implicit gender-science stereotypes. Sex Roles 2021, 85, 405–421. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Sekaquaptewa, D. Gender-based microaggressions in STEM settings. Currents 2019, 1, 1–10. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Shapiro, J.R.; Williams, A.M. The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles 2012, 66, 175–183. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Skolnik, J. Why are girls and women underrepresented in STEM, and what can be done about it? Sci. Educ. 2015, 24, 1301–1306. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Spencer, S.J.; Steele, C.M.; Quinn, D.M. Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1999, 35, 4–28. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Starr, C.R.; Simpkins, S.D. High school students’ math and science gender stereotypes: Relations with their STEM outcomes and socializers’ stereotypes. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 2021, 24, 273–298. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Stephenson, T.; Fleer, M.; Fragkiadaki, G. Increasing girls’ STEM engagement in early childhood: Conditions created by the Conceptual PlayWorld model. Res. Sci. Educ. 2022, 52, 1243–1260. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Stephenson, T.; Fleer, M.; Fragkiadaki, G.; Rai, P. “You can be whatever you want to be!”: Transforming teacher practices to support girls’ STEM engagement. Early Child. Educ. J. 2021, 50, 1317–1328. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Wang, M.T.; Degol, J.L. Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2017, 29, 119–140. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Wieselmann, J.R.; Roehrig, G.H.; Kim, J.N. Who succeeds in STEM? Elementary girls’ attitudes and beliefs about self and STEM. Sch. Sci. Math. 2020, 120, 297–308. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Searching for Pedagogical Answers to Support STEM Learning: Gender Perspective. (2022). Kristapsone, Silvija ; Belogrudova, Ludmila ; Daniela, Linda ; Krone, Ilona ; Krae, Gunta ; Vorobjovs, Aleksandrs.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14598-:d:965098.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-04 20:39:25 || Missing content? Let us know