1. Natural resources led innovation: Employing structural break approach to explore USAs natural resources sector. (2023). Tian, Jilin ; Liu, Bailu.
   In: Resources Policy.
   RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:85:y:2023:i:pa:s0301420723005639.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Abramson, H.N. Technology Transfer Systems in the United States and Germany: Lessons and Perspectives; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1997; p. 5271. ISBN 978-0-309-05530-7.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Allen, K.R. Bringing New Technology to Market; Pearson: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2003; ISBN 978-0-13-093373-7.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Australia, I.P. Choose Your Commercialisation Vehicle Option. Available online: https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/understandingip /commercialise-your-ip/choose-your-commercialisation-vehicle-option (accessed on 11 July 2022).
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Bagheri, S.K.; Goodarzi, M.; Mahdad, M.; Ali Eshtehardi, M.S. Popularity of Patent Commercialization Policies: Iran as a Case. World Pat. Inf. 2021, 66, 102063. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Bandarian, R. Evaluation of Commercial Potential of a New Technology at the Early Stage of Development with Fuzzy Logic. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2007, 2, 13.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Carvalho, L.C.; Madeira, M.J. (Eds.) Global Campaigning Initiatives for Socio-Economic Development; Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-1-5225-7937-3. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15847 13 of 13
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Chaudhuri, R.; Chatterjee, S.; Vrontis, D.; Chaudhuri, S. Innovation in SMEs, AI Dynamism, and Sustainability: The Current Situation and Way Forward. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12760. [CrossRef]

8. Cho, J.; Lee, J. Development of a New Technology Product Evaluation Model for Assessing Commercialization Opportunities Using Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP Approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40, 5314–5330. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Cooper, R.G. Managing Technology Development Projects. Res.-Technol. Manag. 2006, 49, 23–31. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Dehghani, T. Technology Commercialization: From Generating Ideas to Creating Economic Value. IJOL 2015, 4, 192–199. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Delbecq, A.L.; Van de Ven, A.H. A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program Planning. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 1971, 7, 466–492. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. Dereli, T.; Altun, K. A Novel Approach for Assessment of Candidate Technologies with Respect to Their Innovation Potentials: Quick Innovation Intelligence Process. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40, 881–891. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Eckenrode, R.T. Weighting Multiple Criteria. Manag. Sci. 1965, 12, 180–192. [CrossRef]

14. Erdogan, S.A.; Šaparauskas, J.; Turskis, Z. Decision Making in Construction Management: AHP and Expert Choice Approach. Procedia Eng. 2017, 172, 270–276. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. European Patent Office. Patentability Requirements. Available online: https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/ guidelines/e/g_i_1.htm (accessed on 11 July 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

16. Fan, Y.-K.; Yu, W.-Y. Gauging the Process of International Technology Transfer. J. Technol. Transf. 1983, 7, 45–51. [CrossRef]

17. Fasi, M.A. An Overview on Patenting Trends and Technology Commercialization Practices in the University Technology Transfer Offices in USA and China. World Pat. Inf. 2022, 68, 102097. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Galbraith, C.S.; DeNoble, A.F.; Ehrlich, S.B.; Kline, D.M. Can Experts Really Assess Future Technology Success? A Neural Network and Bayesian Analysis of Early Stage Technology Proposals. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 2007, 17, 125–137. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Goldsmith Technology Commercialization Model. Available online: https://www.unomaha.edu/nebraska-businessdevelopment -center/technology-commercialization/goldsmith-technology/index.php (accessed on 26 January 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Gray, A.; Boehlje, M.; Amanor-Boadu, V.; Fulton, J. Agricultural Innovation and New Ventures: Assessing the Commercial Potential. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2004, 86, 1322–1329. [CrossRef]

21. Gu, J. Effects of Patent Policy on Outputs and Commercialization of Academic Patents in China: A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13459. [CrossRef]

22. Haddad, M.; Sanders, D. Selection of Discrete Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods in the Presence of Risk and Uncertainty. Oper. Res. Perspect. 2018, 5, 357–370. [CrossRef]

23. Hamano, Y. Commercialization Procedures: Licensing, Spin-Offs and Start-Ups (WIPO). Available online: https://www.wipo. int/edocs/mdocs/aspac/en/wipo_ip_han_11/wipo_ip_han_11_ref_t7b.pdf (accessed on 11 July 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Jolly, C. The Technology Transfer Process: Concepts, Framework and Methodology. J. Technol. Transf. 1977, 1, 77–91. [CrossRef]

25. Jolly, D. The Issue of Weightings in Technology Portfolio Management. Technovation 2003, 23, 383–391. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. JRC E-Learning Course on Knowledge Transfer. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/assets/jrc/knowledge-transfert-course/ story_html5.html (accessed on 26 January 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. Keršulienė, V.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Turskis, Z. Selection of Rational Dispute Resolution Method by Applying New Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA). J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2010, 11, 243–258. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Khabiri, N.; Rast, S.; Senin, A.A. Identifying Main Influential Elements in Technology Transfer Process: A Conceptual Model. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 40, 417–423. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Kim, W.; Han, S.K.; Oh, K.J.; Kim, T.Y.; Ahn, H.; Song, C. The Dual Analytic Hierarchy Process to Prioritize Emerging Technologies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2010, 77, 566–577. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Kirchberger, M.A.; Pohl, L. Technology Commercialization: A Literature Review of Success Factors and Antecedents across Different Contexts. J. Technol. Transf. 2016, 41, 1077–1112. [CrossRef]

31. Ma, Q.; Wu, W.; Liu, Y. The Fit between Technology Management and Technological Capability and Its Impact on New Product Development Performance. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10956. [CrossRef]

32. Mohamed, M.M.A.; Liu, P.; Nie, G. Are Technological Innovation and Foreign Direct Investment a Way to Boost Economic Growth? An Egyptian Case Study Using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Model. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3265. [CrossRef]

33. Mohamed, M.M.A.; Liu, P.; Nie, G. Causality between Technological Innovation and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Economies of Developing Countries. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3586. [CrossRef]

34. Palomo-Domínguez, I.; Zemlickienė, V. Evaluation Expediency of Eco-Friendly Advertising Formats for Different Generation Based on Spanish Advertising Experts. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1090. [CrossRef]

35. Price, C.; Huston, R.; Meyers, A.D. A New Approach to Improve Technology Commercialisation in University Medical Schools. J. Commer. Biotechnol. 2008, 14, 96–102. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Rahal, A.D. Assessment Framework for the Evaluation and Prioritization of University Technologies for Licensing and Commercialization. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA, 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Saaty, T.L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process; RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1996; Volume 4922.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
38. Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation; McGraw-Hill International Book Co: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1980; ISBN 978-0-07-054371-3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Saheed, A. Gbadegeshin Stating Best Commercialization Method: An Unanswered Question from Scholars and Practitioners. Int. J. Soc. Behav. Educ. Econ. Bus. Ind. Eng. 2017, 11, 1088–1094. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Sohn, S.Y.; Moon, T.H. Structural Equation Model for Predicting Technology Commercialization Success Index (TCSI). Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2003, 70, 885–899. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Technology Commercialization Process|Research|Michigan Tech. Available online: https://www.mtu.edu/research/ innovation/commercialize-technology/process/ (accessed on 26 January 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. Technology Commercialization Process|UCOP. Available online: https://www.ucop.edu/knowledge-transfer-office/ innovation/training-and-education/technology-commercialization-process.html (accessed on 11 July 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Technology Commercialization Process|UTRGV. Available online: https://www.utrgv.edu/research/for-partners/tech-commprocess /index.htm (accessed on 26 January 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Technology Transfer Process|LSU Innovation & Technology Commercialization. Available online: https://www.lsu.edu/ innovation/faculty/techtransferprocess.php (accessed on 26 October 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. Technology Transfer Process|Technology Transfer and Commercialization. Available online: https://www.jsums.edu/ technologytransfer/technology-transfer-process/ (accessed on 26 October 2021).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. The Commercialisation Process. Available online: https://www.ed.ac.uk/edinburgh-innovations/for-staff/commercialisationroutes /commercial-process (accessed on 11 July 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Thokala, P.; Duenas, A. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Technology Assessment. Value Health 2012, 15, 1172–1181. [CrossRef]

48. Tseng, A.A.; Raudensky, M. Performance Evaluations of Technology Transfer Offices of Major US Research Universities. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2014, 9, 93–102. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. Turoff, M.; Linstone, H.A. The Delphi Method-Techniques and Applications. 2002. Available online: http://www.foresight.pl/ assets/downloads/publications/Turoff_Linstone.pdf (accessed on 30 August 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Turskis, Z.; Dzitac, S.; Stankiuviene, A.; Šukys, R. A Fuzzy Group Decision-Making Model for Determining the Most Influential Persons in the Sustainable Prevention of Accidents in the Construction SMEs. Int. J. Comput. Commun. 2019, 14, 90–106. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

51. Turskis, Z.; Goranin, N.; Nurusheva, A.; Boranbayev, S. A Fuzzy WASPAS-Based Approach to Determine Critical Information Infrastructures of EU Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2019, 11, 424. [CrossRef]

52. Turskis, Z.; Goranin, N.; Nurusheva, A.; Boranbayev, S. Information Security Risk Assessment in Critical Infrastructure: A Hybrid MCDM Approach. Informatica 2019, 30, 187–211. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Turskis, Z.; Lazauskas, M.; Zavadskas, E.K. Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Assessment of Construction Site Alternatives for NonHazardous Waste Incineration Plant in Vilnius City, Applying ARAS-F and AHP Methods. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 2012, 20, 110–120. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
54. Van Norman, G.A.; Eisenkot, R. Technology Transfer: From the Research Bench to Commercialization. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2017, 2, 197–208. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
55. Yu, P.; Lee, J.H. A Hybrid Approach Using Two-Level SOM and Combined AHP Rating and AHP/DEA-AR Method for Selecting Optimal Promising Emerging Technology. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40, 300–314. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2022, 14, 15847 12 of 13
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
56. Zolfani, S.H.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Turskis, Z. Design of Products with Both International and Local Perspectives Based on Yin-Yang Balance Theory and Swara Method. Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraživanja 2013, 26, 153–166. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Artificial Intelligence and the Performance of Manufacturing Firms in North-Central Nigeria: Reward System as the Moderator. (2025). Philemon, Audu Yakubu ; Ihuoma, Aziwe Nwakaego.
   In: International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science.
   RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:1738-1755.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. New method for assigning cardinal weights in multi-criteria decision-making: the constant weight ratio method. (2024). del Mar, Maria ; Vinolas, Bernat.
   In: Operational Research.
   RePEc:spr:operea:v:24:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-024-00833-w.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Eliciting Informative Priors by Modeling Expert Decision Making. (2024). Falconer, Julia R ; Frank, Eibe ; Joshi, Chaitanya.
   In: Decision Analysis.
   RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:77-90.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. SHARDA–ARAS: A Methodology for Prioritising Project Managers in Sustainable Development. (2024). Turskis, Zenonas ; Kerulien, Violeta.
   In: Mathematics.
   RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:219-:d:1315784.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Applications of generative AI and future organizational performance: The mediating role of explorative and exploitative innovation and the moderating role of ethical dilemmas and environmental dynamism. (2024). Chatterjee, Sheshadri ; Mariani, Marcello ; Singh, Kuldeep.
   In: Technovation.
   RePEc:eee:techno:v:133:y:2024:i:c:s0166497224000713.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Methods for Eliciting Informative Prior Distributions: A Critical Review. (2022). Falconer, Julia R ; Frank, Eibe ; Joshi, Chaitanya.
   In: Decision Analysis.
   RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:189-204.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Determination of Importance of Key Decision Points in the Technology Commercialization Process: Attitude of the US and German Experts. (2022). Turskis, Zenonas ; Zemlickien, Vaida.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15847-:d:986794.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Developing a strategy map for forensic accounting with fraud risk management: An integrated balanced scorecard-based decision model. (2020). Lee, Kuen-Chang ; Yang, Chih-Hao.
   In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
   RePEc:eee:epplan:v:80:y:2020:i:c:s0149718919302411.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Assessment of agricultural land suitability for irrigation with reclaimed water using geospatial multi-criteria decision analysis. (2020). Negahban-Azar, Masoud ; Paul, Manashi ; Montas, Hubert ; Shirmohammadi, Adel.
   In: Agricultural Water Management.
   RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:231:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419306468.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Evaluation of the Impact of Selected Weighting Methods on the Results of the TOPSIS Technique. (2019). Vavrek, Roman.
    In: International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM).
    RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:18:y:2019:i:06:n:s021962201950041x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. A new railway tunnel under Brussels? Assessing political feasibility and desirability with competence-based multi criteria analysis. (2018). van Raemdonck, Koen ; Te, Geert ; Macharis, Cathy.
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:66:y:2018:i:c:p:30-39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Can microalgae biodiesel contribute to achieve the sustainability objectives in the transport sector in France by 2030? A comparison between first, second and third generation biofuels though a range-based Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis. (2018). Vallee, Thomas ; Baudry, Gino ; Macharis, Cathy.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:155:y:2018:i:c:p:1032-1046.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Range-based Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis: A combined method of Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis and Monte Carlo simulation to support participatory decision making under uncertainty. (2018). Vallee, Thomas ; Baudry, Gino ; Macharis, Cathy.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:264:y:2018:i:1:p:257-269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Discovering Important Criteria for National Culture towards Harmony in Malaysia Based on Rank Order Centroid Weighting Method. (2018). Farhanahhasnan, Siti ; Ramli, Razamin ; Hamid, Mohd Noorabdul.
    In: The Journal of Social Sciences Research.
    RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:260-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. A three-stage hybrid approach for weight assignment in MADM. (2017). Khoveyni, Mohammad ; Yang, Jian-Bo ; Xu, Dong-Ling.
    In: Omega.
    RePEc:eee:jomega:v:71:y:2017:i:c:p:93-105.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. A Mixed-Data Evaluation in Group TOPSIS with Differentiated Decision Power. (2016). Shih, Hsu-Shih.
    In: Group Decision and Negotiation.
    RePEc:spr:grdene:v:25:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10726-015-9451-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Evaluation of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Systems Using Fuzzy Shannon Entropy and Fuzzy TOPSIS. (2016). Raslanas, Saulius ; Cavallaro, Fausto ; Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:6:p:556-:d:72016.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Towards a sustainable capacity expansion of the Danish biogas sector. (2014). Bojesen, Mikkel ; Boerboom, Luc ; Skov-Petersen, Hans.
    In: IFRO Working Paper.
    RePEc:foi:wpaper:2014_03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Expert Elicitation of Adversary Preferences Using Ordinal Judgments. (2013). Bier, Vicki M ; Wang, Chen.
    In: Operations Research.
    RePEc:inm:oropre:v:61:y:2013:i:2:p:372-385.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. The Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) application in the Flemish long-term decision making process on mobility and logistics. (2010). Turcksin, Laurence ; Macharis, Cathy ; De Witte, Astrid .
    In: Transport Policy.
    RePEc:eee:trapol:v:17:y:2010:i:5:p:303-311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Weights determination of OWA operators by parametric identification. (2008). Renaud, Jean ; Levrat, Eric ; Fonteix, Christian .
    In: Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM).
    RePEc:eee:matcom:v:77:y:2008:i:5:p:499-511.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management. (2007). Hajkowicz, Stefan ; Collins, Kerry .
    In: Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA).
    RePEc:spr:waterr:v:21:y:2007:i:9:p:1553-1566.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Comparison of two multicriteria decision aid methods: Net Flow and Rough Set Methods in a high yield pulping process. (2007). Lanouette, R. ; Kiss, L. N. ; Zaras, K. ; Thibault, J. ; Renaud, J. ; Fonteix, C..
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:177:y:2007:i:3:p:1418-1432.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Multi-attributed environmental index construction. (2006). Hajkowicz, Stefan.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:57:y:2006:i:1:p:122-139.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Taking a closer look at multiple criteria analysis and economic evaluation. (2006). Hajkowicz, Stefan.
    In: 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare06:139785.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. THE STRATEGIC EVALUATION OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES THROUGH MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS: THE ADVISORS CASE. (2004). de Brucker, Klaas ; Macharis, Cathy ; Verbeke, Alain.
    In: Research in Transportation Economics.
    RePEc:eee:retrec:v:8:y:2004:i:1:p:443-462.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. (2004). de Brucker, Klaas ; Springael, Johan ; Macharis, Cathy ; Verbeke, Alain.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:153:y:2004:i:2:p:307-317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Determining attribute weights using mathematical programming. (2003). Thompson, Ronald L. ; Jesse, Richard R. ; Shirland, Larry E. ; Iacovou, Charalambos L..
    In: Omega.
    RePEc:eee:jomega:v:31:y:2003:i:6:p:423-437.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best. (2001). Bottomley, Paul A. ; Doyle, John R..
    In: Omega.
    RePEc:eee:jomega:v:29:y:2001:i:6:p:553-560.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. A weight-assessing method with habitual domains. (1998). Chen, Ting-Yu ; Wang, Jih-Chang ; Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:110:y:1998:i:2:p:342-367.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors. (1995). Mandakovic, Tomislav ; Gupta, Sushil K. ; Hong, Sungwan ; Sahay, Sundeep ; ZANAKIS, STELIOS H..
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:29:y:1995:i:1:p:59-79.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY, MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES AND UNCERTAINTY IN EX ANTE PROJECT EVALUATION. (1977). Dillon, John L. ; Perry, C..
    In: Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:ags:remaae:9180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 13:06:59 || Missing content? Let us know