This document has not been cited yet.

1. Accorsi, R.; Bhat, R.; Meinke, H.; Tappi, S. Food engineering strategies for sustainable food supply chains: Interdisciplinarity is the key. J. Food Eng. 2022, 321, 110947. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Althaus, H.J. Life Cycle Inventories of Chemicals; Final Report Ecoinvent Data v2.0; Swiss Centre for LCI, Empa—TSL: Dübendorf, Germany, 2007.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Bayne, K.; Renwick, A. Beyond Sustainable Intensification: Transitioning Primary Sectors through Reconfiguring Land-Use. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3225. [CrossRef]

4. Bennich, T.; Belyazid, S.; Stjernquist, I.; Diemer, A.; Seifollahi-Aghmiuni, S.; Kalantari, Z. The bio-based economy, 2030 Agenda, and strong sustainability e A regional-scale assessment of sustainability goal interactions. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 283, 125174. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Bezama, A. Let us discuss how cascading can help implement the circular economy and the bio-economy strategies. Waste Manag. Res. 2016, 34, 593–594. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Bezama, A.; Hildebrandt, J.; Thrän, D. Integrating Regionalized Socioeconomic Considerations onto Life Cycle Assessment for Evaluating Bioeconomy Value Chains: A Case Study on Hybrid Wood–Concrete Ceiling Elements. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4221. [CrossRef]

7. Bezama, A.; Ingrao, C.; O’Keeffe, S.; Thran, D. Resources, Collaborators, and Neighbors: The Three-Pronged Challenge in the Implementation of Bioeconomy Regions. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7235. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Borge, L.; Bröring, S. Exploring effectiveness of technology transfer in interdisciplinary settings: The case of the bioeconomy. Creat. Innov. Manag. 2017, 26, 311–322. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Budzinski, M.; Bezama, A.; Thrän, D. Monitoring the progress towards bioeconomy using multi-regional input-output analysis: The example of wood use in Germany. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 161, 1–11. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Budzinski, M.; Nitzsche, R. Comparative economic and environmental assessment of four beech wood based biorefinery concepts. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 216, 613–621. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Chomicz, E. ERRIN Messages for Horizon Europe Widera Work Programme 2023–2024; ERRIN: Brussels, Belgium, 2022.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation—European Commission. European Bioeconomy Policy: Stocktaking and Future Developments: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2022. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Fytili, D.; Zabaniotou, A. Organizational, societal, knowledge and skills capacity for a low carbon energy transition in a Circular Waste Bioeconomy (CWBE): Observational evidence of the Thessaly region in Greece. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 813, 151870. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Halonen, M.; Näyhä, A.; Kuhmonen, I. Regional sustainability transition through forest-based bioeconomy? Development actors’ perspectives on related policies, power, and justice. For. Policy Econ. 2022, 142, 102775. [CrossRef]

15. Hildebrandt, J. Monitoring the Sustainability of Added-Value Networks in Bioeconomy Regions. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Hildebrandt, J.; Bezama, A.; Thrän, D. The contribution of wood-based construction materials for leveraging a low carbon building sector in Europe. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 34, 405–418. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Hildebrandt, J.; O’Keeffe, S.; Bezama, A.; Thrän, D. Revealing the Environmental Advantages of Industrial Symbiosis in Wood-Based Bioeconomy Networks: An Assessment From a Life Cycle Perspective. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019, 23, 808–822. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Huijbregts, M.A.J.; Steinmann, Z.J.N.; Elshout, P.M.F.; Stam, G.; Verones, F.; Vieira, M.D.M.; Hollander, A.; Zijp, M.; van Zelm, R. ReCiPe 2016 v1.1 A Harmonized Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method at Midpoint and End-Point Level Report I: Characterization; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport: Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2017; p. 201.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Iribarren, D.; Calvo-Serrano, R.; Martín-Gamboa, M.; Galán-Martín, .; Guillén-Gosálbez, G. Social life cycle assessment of green methanol and benchmarking against conventional fossil methanol. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 824, 153840. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Jarosch, L. A Social Life Cycle Assessment in Context of the Bioeconomy: The Example of Social Aspects of the Timber Processing Industry in Central Germany. Bachelor’s Thesis, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Kellenberger, D. Life Cycle Inventories of Building Products; Final Report Ecoinvent Data v2.0; Swiss Centre for LCI, Empa—TSL: Dübendorf, Germany, 2007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Krombholz, A.; Eversmann, N.; Werner, P. Lignin based Sandwich System for load bearing insulation. In Proceedings of the World SB14 Barcelona Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 28–30 October 2014; ISBN 978-84-697-1815-5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Krombholz, A.; Theumer, T.; Hildebrandt, J.; Budzinski, M.; Weber, A. LCA and mechanics of beech fiber laminates with lignin based phenolic resin systems. In Proceedings of the 11 Holzwerkstoffkolloquium, Dresden, Germany, 10–11 December 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Laibach, N.; Börner, J.; Bröring, S. Exploring the future of the bioeconomy: An expert-based scoping study examining key enabling technology fields with potential to foster the transition toward a bio-based economy. Technol. Soc. 2019, 58, 101118. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Lange, L. Strategies for a Rapid Transition to a Circular, Biobased Society. In Bio#Futures; Koukios, E., Sacio-Szymańska, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 55–71. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Marting Vidaurre, N.A.; Vargas-Carpintero, R.; Wagner, M.; Lask, J.; Lewandowski, I. Social Aspects in the Assessment of Biobased Value Chains. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9843. [CrossRef]

27. Messmann, L.; Wietschel, L.; Thorenz, A.; Tuma, A. Assessing the social dimension in strategic network optimization for a sustainable development: The case of bioethanol production in the EU. J. Ind. Ecol. 2022. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Michels, J.; Bäcker, W.; Becker, K.; Susanto, A.; Unkelbach, G.; Leschinsky, M.; Michels, J. “Lignocellulose-Bioraffinerie” Aufschluss lignocellulosehaltiger Rohstoffe und Vollständige Stoffliche Nutzung der Komponenten (Phase 2); BTS, CBP, DECHEMA, Dynea, Evonik, ICT, IGB, InfraLeuna, KIT-IIP, Tecnaro, TI-WF, TU KL, Uni GI, Uni-HH/TI, Frankfurt am M.: Wacker, Germany, 2014; p. 405.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. NASA. Technology Readiness Levels. Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/scan/engineering/technology/ technology_readiness_level (accessed on 15 July 2022).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Nitzsche, R.; Budzinski, M.; Gröngröft, A. Techno-economic assessment of a wood-based biorefinery concept for the production of polymer-grade ethylene, organosolv lignin and fuel. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 200, 928–939. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Nordegraaf, J. From Biomass to Bioproducts—BioFoam by Synbra Technology; Synbra Technologies: Etten-Leur, The Netherlands, 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Pufky-Heinrich, D.; Rößiger, B.; Röver, R.; Unkelbach, G. Process Scale-up for the Production of Bioaromatic Compounds from Lignin. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2016, 88, 1229–1230. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Rüter, S.; Diederichs, S. Ökobilanz-Basisdaten für Bauprodukte aus Holz; Bundesforschungsinstitut für Ländliche Räume, Wald und Fischerei Institut für Holztechnologie und Holzbiologie (HTB), Institut für Holztechnologie und Holzbiologie, Zentrum Holzwirtschaft Universität Hamburg: Hamburg, Germany, 2012; p. 316.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Siebert, A. Socio-Economic Assessment of Wood-Based Products from German Bioeconomy Regions: A Social Life Cycle Assessment Approach. PhD Thesis, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Siebert, A.; O’Keeffe, S.; Bezama, A.; Zeug, W.; Thran, D. How not to compare apples and oranges: Generate context-specific performance reference points for a social life cycle assessment model. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 198, 587–600. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2022, 14, 15886 14 of 14
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Solarte-Toro, J.C.; Cardona Alzate, C.A. Biorefineries as the base for accomplishing the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the transition to bioeconomy: Technical aspects, challenges and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 340, 125626. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Stark, S.; Biber-Freudenberger, L.; Dietz, T.; Escobar, N.; Förster, J.J.; Henderson, J.; Laibach, N.; Börner, J. Sustainability implications of transformation pathways for the bioeconomy. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 29, 215–227. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
38. Synbra, T. Technical Data Sheet (TDS)—BioFoam—Listing of Properties, Version 9.0; Synbra Technology: Etten-Leur, The Netherlands, 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Talwar, N.; Holden, N.M. The limitations of bioeconomy LCA studies for understanding the transition to sustainable bioeconomy. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2022, 27, 680–703. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. The European Bioeconomy Stakeholder Panel. European Bioeconomy Stakeholders MANIFESTO; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2017. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15886 13 of 14
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Thrän, D. Einführung in das System Bioökonomie. In Das System Bioökonomie; Thrän, D., Moesenfechtel, U., Eds.; Springer Spektrum: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 1–19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. Werner, F. Life Cycle Inventories of Wood as Fuel and Construction Material; Final Report Ecoinvent Data v2.0; Swiss Centre for LCI, Empa—TSL: Dübendorf, Germany, 2007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Werner, F.; Richter, K. Wooden building products in comparative LCA: A literature review. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2007, 12, 470–479. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Zah, R. Life Cycle Inventories of Detergents; Final Report Ecoinvent Data v2.0; Swiss Centre for LCI, Empa—TSL: Dübendorf, Germany, 2007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. An Attempt to Assess the Implementation of the Circular Economy in the EU-27 as an Important Element of Sustainable Development. (2025). Marciniuk-Kluska, Anna.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4942-:d:1666026.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Actors, discourses and relations in the Finnish newspapers forest discussion: Enabling or constraining the sustainability transition?. (2024). Wallius, Venla ; Nyh, Annukka.
   In: Forest Policy and Economics.
   RePEc:eee:forpol:v:169:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124001850.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Synergies and trade-offs in the European forest bioeconomy research: State of the art and the way forward. (2024). Hetemaki, L ; Hurmekoski, E ; D'Amato, D ; Giurca, A.
   In: Forest Policy and Economics.
   RePEc:eee:forpol:v:163:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124000571.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Social Life-Cycle Assessment in the Construction Industry: A Review of Characteristics, Limitations, and Challenges of S-LCA through Case Studies. (2023). Pellerin, Robert ; Ayassamy, Prisca.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14569-:d:1255248.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Progress of social assessment in the framework of bioeconomy under a life cycle perspective. (2023). Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara ; Rebolledo-Leiva, Ricardo ; Moreira, Maria Teresa.
   In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
   RePEc:eee:rensus:v:175:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123000187.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Forest bioeconomy at regional scale: A systematic literature review and future policy perspectives. (2023). Pazienza, Pasquale ; Cappelletti, Giulio Mario ; di Letizia, Gerardo ; de Lucia, Caterina.
   In: Forest Policy and Economics.
   RePEc:eee:forpol:v:155:y:2023:i:c:s1389934123001478.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Sharing economy in the forestry sector: Opportunities and barriers. (2023). Paluš, Hubert ; Machoň, Miloslav ; Rinn, R ; Purwestri, R C ; Palatova, P ; Jarsk, V.
   In: Forest Policy and Economics.
   RePEc:eee:forpol:v:154:y:2023:i:c:s1389934123000953.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. What Drives a Future German Bioeconomy? A Narrative and STEEPLE Analysis for Explorative Characterisation of Scenario Drivers. (2022). Richter, Soren ; Szarka, Nora ; Thran, Daniela ; Bezama, Alberto.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3045-:d:764629.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Analyzing the Potential Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts of Regional Energy Integration Scenarios of a Bio-Based Industrial Network. (2022). Hildebrandt, Jakob ; Thran, Daniela ; Bezama, Alberto.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15886-:d:987760.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Analysis of Financial Support for Forestry in the Czech Republic from the Perspective of Forest Bioeconomy. (2022). Jarsk, Vilem ; Rinn, Radek.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15575-:d:981578.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Land Management Change as Adaptation to Climate and Other Stressors: A Systematic Review of Decision Contexts Using Values-Rules-Knowledge. (2022). Kirk, Nicholas A ; Cradock-Henry, Nicholas A.
    In: Land.
    RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:791-:d:825379.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Priorities in Bioeconomy Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review. (2022). Papadopoulou, Christina-Ioanna ; LOIZOU, Efstratios ; Chatzitheodoridis, Fotios.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7258-:d:932311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Engaging or resisting? How forest–based industry and private forest owners respond to bioenergy policies in Aquitaine (Southwestern France). (2022). Banos, Vincent ; Deuffic, Philippe ; Brahic, Elodie.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:144:y:2022:i:c:s1389934122001563.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. From pro-growth and planetary limits to degrowth and decoloniality: An emerging bioeconomy policy and research agenda. (2022). Dressler, Wolfram ; Ramcilovic-Suominen, Sabaheta ; Kroger, Markus.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:144:y:2022:i:c:s1389934122001320.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Measuring farmers well‐being: Influence of farm‐level factors on satisfaction with work and quality of life. (2022). Gersterbentaya, Maria ; Sabillon, Beatriz Herrera ; Knierim, Andrea.
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:73:y:2022:i:2:p:452-471.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Identifying methodological challenges in the social risk assessment of cellulosic ethanol value chains. (2022). Marting, Nirvana A ; Lask, Jan ; Lewandowski, Iris.
    In: Journal of Industrial Ecology.
    RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:4:p:1233-1246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Toward a Green, Closed-Loop, Circular Bioeconomy: Boosting the Performance Efficiency of Circular Business Models. (2020). Bochtis, Dionysis ; Achillas, Charisios.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10142-:d:456971.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-03 23:28:17 || Missing content? Let us know