create a website

Renewable Energy in the Chinese News Media: A Comparative Study and Policy Implications. (2024). Peng, Xinyi ; Zhang, LI.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5237-:d:1418467.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 58

References cited by this document

Cocites: 59

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Amin, A.Z. Here Comes the Sun: Will China be a Superpower in a World Transformed by Renewable Energy? Newsweek, 12 January 2019, pp. 16–17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. An, N. Promote clean and low-carbon energy consumption in the building materials industry. China Energy News, 14 November 2022, p. 3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Arlt, D.; Wolling, J. Fukushima effects in Germany? Changes in media coverage and public opinion on nuclear power. Public Underst. Sci. 2016, 25, 842–885. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. BNEF. Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2019; Frankfurt School-UNEP Collaborating Centre for Climate & Sustainable Energy Finance: Frankfurt, Germany, 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Cabré, M.M.; Gallagher, K.P.; Li, Z. Renewable energy: The trillion dollar opportunity for Chinese overseas investment. China World Econ. 2018, 26, 27–49. [CrossRef]

  6. Chen, Z. Yunnan releases carbon peaking implementation plan. China Energy News, 22 May 2023, p. 16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. China. Energy in China’s New Era. State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. 2020. Available online: http://www.scio.gov.cn/ztk/dtzt/42313/44537/index.htm?eqid=dc10f6380003713f00000005642b8929&eqid=e8e1a2 da0010a94800000005649453aa (accessed on 22 March 2024).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. China. Renewable Energy Law of China. Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of China. 2009. Available online: https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail2.html?MmM5MDlmZGQ2NzhiZjE3OTAxNjc4YmY3MDhhNjA1NzM (accessed on 22 March 2024).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. China. The Medium- and Long-Term Renewable Energy Development Plan. National Energy Administration of China. 2007. Available online: https://www.nea.gov.cn/2007-09/05/c_131215784.htm?eqid=dd6bedaf00036c2e0000000364745c59 (accessed on 22 March 2024).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Choi, Y.S.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, B.W. Public’s perception and judgment on nuclear power. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2000, 27, 295–309. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Clarke, C.E.; Hart, P.S.; Schuldt, J.P.; Evensen, D.T.N.; Boudet, H.S.; Jacquet, J.B.; Stedman, R.C. Public opinion on energy development: The interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology. Energy Policy 2015, 81, 131–140. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Cnenergynews Website. About Us. 2023. Available online: https://www.cnenergynews.cn/about.html (accessed on 5 December 2023).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. De Groot, J.I.M.; Steg, L.; Poortinga, W. Values, Perceived Risks and Benefits, and Acceptability of Nuclear Energy. Risk Anal. 2013, 33, 307–317. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

  14. Ding, Y.; Kou, J. Non-fossil energy accounts for more than 15 percent of primary energy consumption. People’s Daily, 27 December 2020, p. 1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Djerf-Pierre, M.; Cokley, J.; Kuchel, L.J. Framing Renewable Energy: A Comparative Study of Newspapers in Australia and Sweden. Environ. Commun. 2016, 10, 634–655. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Dong, Z. Europe and America’s green transition meets its plight. China Energy News, 29 August 2022, p. 4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Dong, Z. Household photovoltaic continues to be hot. China Energy News, 29 March 2021, p. 9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Du, Q.; Han, Z. The framing of nuclear energy in Chinese media discourse: A comparison between national and local newspapers. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 245, 118695. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. European Commission. The European Green Deal: Striving to Be the First Climate-Neutral Continent. 2019. Available online: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en (accessed on 22 March 2024).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Gippner, O.; Torney, D. Shifting policy priorities in EU-China energy relations: Implications for Chinese energy investments in Europe. Energy Policy 2017, 101, 649–658. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Haigh, M.M. Newspapers use three frames to cover alternative energy. Newsp. Res. J. 2010, 31, 47–62. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Han, X. Going or staying with nuclear power in Europe in light of the energy crisis. Guangming Daily, 6 September 2022, p. 10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Ho, S.S.; Kristiansen, S. Environmental Debates over Nuclear Energy: Media, Communication, and the Public. Environ. Commun. 2019, 13, 431–439. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. International Energy Agency. Executive Summary of Renewables 2023. 2023. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/ renewables-2023/executive-summary# (accessed on 22 March 2024).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Jiang, B.; Raza, M.Y. Research on China’s renewable energy policies under the dual carbon goals: A political discourse analysis. Energy Strategy Rev. 2023, 48, 101118. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Kristiansen, S.; Bonfadelli, H.; Kovic, M. Risk perception of nuclear energy after Fukushima: Stability and change in public opinion in Switzerland. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 2016, 30, 24–50. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Liang, C.; Zhu, L.; Zeng, J. Analysis on the impact of media attention on energy enterprises and energy transformation in China. Energy Rep. 2024, 11, 1820–1833. [CrossRef] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Liu, K. National carbon market opens, green and low-carbon development becomes “real money”. Guangming Daily, 25 July 2021, p. 8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Liu, K. People rely on wind power and photovoltaic power. Guangming Daily, 7 August 2023, p. 5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. McCombs, M. The Agenda-Setting Role of the Mass Media in the Shaping of Public Opinion. Mass Media Economics 2002 Conference, Held in London. 2002. Available online: http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/extra/McCombs.Pdf (accessed on 5 April 2024).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Midttun, A.; Coulter, P.; Gadzekpo, A.; Wang, J. Comparing Media Framings of Climate Change in Developed, Rapid Growth and Developing Countries: Findings from Norway, China and Ghana. Energy Environ. 2015, 26, 1271–1292. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Ming, Z.; Ximei, L.; Yulong, L.; Lilin, P. Review of renewable energy investment and financing in China: Status, mode, issues and countermeasures. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 31, 23–37. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. National Bureau of Statistics of China. Statistical Bulletin on National Economic and Social Development 2017. 2018. Available online: https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202302/t20230203_1899855.html (accessed on 22 March 2024).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. National Bureau of Statistics of China. Statistical Bulletin on National Economic and Social Development 2023. 2024. Available online: https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202402/t20240228_1947915.html (accessed on 22 March 2024).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. National Energy Administration of China. 14th Five-Year Plan for the Development of Renewable Energy. 2021. Available online: http://zfxxgk.nea.gov.cn/1310611148_16541341407541n.pdf?eqid=f39ccaf9002c5e4800000002643d53e7 (accessed on 22 March 2024).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. National Energy Administration of China. Notification on the Monitoring and Evaluation Results of National Renewable Energy Power Development in 2022 by the National Energy Administration. 2023. Available online: http://zfxxgk.nea.gov.cn/2023-09/ 07/c_1310741874.htm (accessed on 22 March 2024).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Nuortimo, K.; Härkönen, J.; Karvonen, E. Exploring the global media image of solar power. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 2806–2811. [CrossRef]

  38. Ozturk, I.; Bilgili, F. Economic growth and biomass consumption nexus: Dynamic panel analysis for Sub-Sahara African countries. Appl. Energy 2015, 137, 110–116. [CrossRef]

  39. Park, D.J.; Wang, W.; Pinto, J. Beyond disaster and risk: Post-Fukushima nuclear news in U.S. and German press. Commun. Crit. Cult. Stud. 2016, 9, 417–437. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Qu, M.; Tahvanainen, L.; Ahponen, P.; Pelkonen, P. Bio-energy in China: Content analysis of news articles on Chinese professional internet platforms. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 2300–2309. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2024, 16, 5237 16 of 17

  41. Sattich, T.; Freeman, D.; Scholten, D.; Yan, S. Renewable energy in EU-China relations: Policy interdependence and its geopolitical implications. Energy Policy 2021, 156, 112456. [CrossRef]

  42. Scheer, D. Communicating energy system modelling to the wider public: An analysis of German media coverage. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 80, 1389–1398. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Schneider, A.; Ingram, H. Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 1993, 87, 334–347. [CrossRef]

  44. Schuman, S.; Lin, A. China’s Renewable Energy Law and its impact on renewable power in China: Progress, challenges and recommendations for improving implementation. Energy Policy 2012, 51, 89–109. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Skjølsvold, T.M. Curb your enthusiasm: On media communication of bioenergy and the role of the news media in technology diffusion. Environ. Commun. 2012, 6, 512–531. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Stephens, J.C.; Rand, G.M.; Melnick, L.L. Wind energy in US media: A comparative state-level analysis of a critical climate change mitigation technology. Environ. Commun. 2009, 3, 168–190. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Su, L.; Xu, S. Green transition is not easy while uncertainty remains—World energy situation outlook 2023. Guangming Daily, 12 January 2023, p. 12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, J.; Gu, J.; Xu, S. Environmental beliefs and public acceptance of nuclear energy in China: A moderated mediation analysis. Energy Policy 2020, 137, 111141. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Wang, L. Controversy over EU’s push for Green New Deal. China Energy News, 12 December 2019, p. 5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Wang, Y. How old coal mining areas get a new lease on life. Economic Daily, 20 July 2023, p. 6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Wang, Y.; Li, N.; Li, J. Media coverage and government policy of nuclear power in the People’s Republic of China. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2014, 77, 214–223. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Wu, Z.; Ye, H.; Liu, Q. The beautiful countryside plays “fishing song”. China Energy News, 12 December 2018, p. 27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Xu, Z.; Li, J.; Hua, X.; Ren, P. Is the tone of the government-controlled media valuable for capital market? Evidence from China’s new energy industry. Energy Policy 2024, 184, 113917. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Yang, Y.; Chen, Y. Gathering strong new kinetic energy for high-quality development. Guangming Daily, 18 April 2023, p. 1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Yu, S.; Zheng, Y.; Li, L. A comprehensive evaluation of the development and utilization of China’s regional renewable energy. Energy Policy 2019, 127, 73–86. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Zhang, L.; Guo, W. Policy-Driven, National Development and Environmental Protection: A Study on the New Energy Vehicle Communication. Sci. Sci. Manag. S T 2023, 44, 103–119.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Zhang, L.; Wang, P. Public Attitude and Opinion Leaders: Mapping Chinese Discussion of EU’s Energy Role on Social Media. JCMS-J. Common Mark. Stud. 2022, 60, 1777–1796. [CrossRef]

  58. Zhu, Y. The carbon market will enter a period of smooth operation in the “14th Five-Year Plan”. China Energy News, 9 November 2020, p. 19. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5237 17 of 17
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Understanding the Causes of Social Acceptance and Rejection of a Uranium Mine Development Project in Northwestern Spain. (2025). Muoz-Sosa, Concepcin ; Snchez-Tabernero, Gonzalo ; Hidalgo-Muoz, Antonio R ; Galn, Jos I.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:429-:d:1562585.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Cross-validation of the Biofuels Beliefs Scale (BBS) on a European sample: A tool to measure the perception of the technological and contextual features of biofuels. (2025). Ariccio, Silvia ; Mosca, Oriana ; Dessi, Federica ; Fornara, Ferdinando ; Bonaiuto, Marino.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x24003282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Analysis of renewable energy investments in Chinas BRI middle corridor using spherical fuzzy decision-making framework. (2025). Pamucar, Dragan ; Ayvaz, Berk ; Tatar, Veysel.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:244:y:2025:i:c:s0960148125002939.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The polarization of energy preferences – A study on social acceptance of wind and nuclear power in Sweden. (2025). Lindvall, Daniel ; Srqvist, Patrik ; Barthel, Stephan ; Lindeberg, Sofie.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:198:y:2025:i:c:s0301421524005123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Renewable Energy in the Chinese News Media: A Comparative Study and Policy Implications. (2024). Peng, Xinyi ; Zhang, LI.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5237-:d:1418467.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Matching Analysis of Technical Parameters and Safety Standards for Nuclear Replacement of Coal-Fired Units. (2024). Zhang, Man ; Yang, Hairui ; Liu, Zhihong ; Zhou, Tuo ; Bie, Rushan.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:22:p:5583-:d:1516867.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Local acceptance of solar farms: The impact of energy narratives. (2024). McCrea, Rod ; Scovell, Mitchell ; Poruschi, Lavinia ; Walton, Andrea.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:189:y:2024:i:pb:s1364032123008870.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Understanding residents’ risk information seeking, processing and sharing regarding waste incineration power projects. (2024). Zhu, Weiwei ; Zeng, Jing ; Song, Jingyan ; Duan, Hongyu.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:304:y:2024:i:c:s036054422401805x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Green outward foreign direct investment and host country environmental effects: The home countrys carbon emission reduction system is crucial. (2024). Xie, Xiangwei ; Su, Miao ; Zhao, Jinjing ; Pan, Jie.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:290:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223035764.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Effect of green industrial policy on Chinas outward renewable energy investment. (2024). Yang, YU ; Ji, Qiang ; Xue, Jiashun ; Poon, Jessie.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:138:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324005383.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Time to talk about values, time to say no: What drives public participation in decision-making on abstract versus concrete energy projects?. (2023). Perlaviciute, Goda ; Squintani, Lorenzo.
    In: PLOS Climate.
    RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000228.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Bibliometric Review on Sustainable Finance. (2023). Shah, Mohamed ; Kashi, Aghilasse.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7119-:d:1131554.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Tourist Behavior and Sustainable Tourism Policy Planning in the COVID-19 Era: Insights from Thailand. (2023). Zhang, Wuyi ; Wichitphongsa, Wachira ; Srisawat, Purim ; Sukpatch, Kassara.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5724-:d:1106669.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. A contested agenda: Energy transitions in lower-income African countries. (2023). Pedersen, Rasmus Hundsbak ; Andersen, Ole Winckler.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:175:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523000812.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Personal attributes and (mis)perceptions of local environmental risk. (2023). Li, Zhengyan ; Konisky, David M.
    In: Review of Policy Research.
    RePEc:bla:revpol:v:40:y:2023:i:1:p:119-152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. How Social Impressions Affect Public Acceptance of Nuclear Energy: A Case Study in China. (2022). Shao, Zhijuan ; Zhang, Xiaofeng ; Yang, Jie ; Wang, Jie ; Shen, Chunqi.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11190-:d:908869.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Risk Perceptions and Amplification Effects over Time: Evaluating Fukushima Longitudinal Surveys. (2022). Pijawka, David K ; Hagen, Bjoern ; Opejin, Adenike.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7896-:d:850846.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Where Does an Individual’s Willingness to Act on Alleviating the Climate Crisis in Korea Arise from?. (2022). Kwon, Seol A.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6664-:d:827528.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. China’s withdrawal from overseas coal in context. (2022). Springer, Cecilia Han.
    In: World Development Perspectives.
    RePEc:eee:wodepe:v:25:y:2022:i:c:s2452292922000054.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A systematic review of barriers to greenfield investment in decarbonisation solutions. (2022). Rekker, Saphira ; Emodi, Nnaemeka Vincent ; Greig, Chris ; Wade, Belinda.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:165:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122004828.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Sustainable technology acceptability: Mapping technological, contextual, and social-psychological determinants of EU stakeholders’ biofuel acceptance. (2022). Albers, T ; Ariccio, S ; Alves, S ; Ludovico, N ; Bonaiuto, M ; Dessi, F.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:158:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122000430.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Short and long-term dominance of negative information in shaping public energy perceptions: The case of shallow geothermal systems. (2022). , Ulf ; Spampatti, Tobia ; Brosch, Tobias ; Trutnevyte, Evelina.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:167:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522002956.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. A hybrid choice modelling approach to estimate the trade-off between perceived environmental risks and economic benefits. (2022). Atzori, Rossella ; Strazzera, Elisabetta ; Meleddu, Daniela.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:196:y:2022:i:c:s0921800922000623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Nuclear Power Risk Perception in Serbia: Fear of Exposure to Radiation vs. Social Benefits. (2021). Cvetković, Vladimir ; Lyamzina, Yuliya ; Nikoli, Neda ; Miloevi, Goran ; Noji, Eric K ; Ocal, Adem.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2464-:d:543560.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Bank as a Stakeholder in the Financing of Renewable Energy Sources. Recommendations and Policy Implications for Poland. (2021). Jajuga, Krzysztof ; Daszyska-Ygado, Karolina ; Zabawa, Justyna.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:19:p:6422-:d:651555.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. China’s investments in renewable energy in Africa: Creating co-benefits or just cashing-in?. (2021). Lema, Rasmus ; Hansen, Ulrich Elmer ; Bhamidipati, Padmasai Lakshmi ; Kirchherr, Julian ; Gregersen, Cecilia.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:141:y:2021:i:c:s0305750x20304939.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. What drives public acceptance of sustainable CO2-derived building materials? A conjoint-analysis of eco-benefits vs. health concerns. (2021). Heek, Offermann-Van J ; Ziefle, M ; Arning, K.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:144:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121001672.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Cognitive and demographic drivers of attitudes toward using genetic engineering to restore American chestnut trees. (2021). Needham, Mark D ; Petit, Joshua D ; Howe, Glenn T.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:125:y:2021:i:c:s1389934120307115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Effects of information strategies on public acceptance of nuclear energy. (2021). Hu, Xiaoli ; Zhu, Weiwei ; Wei, Jiuchang.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:231:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221011555.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Energy cooperation between Myanmar and China under One Belt One Road: Current state, challenges and perspectives. (2021). Swe, Thidar ; Yu, Tao ; Sun, Liming ; Shu, Hongchun ; Zeng, Chunyuan ; Yang, BO ; Chen, Yixuan ; Li, Xin ; Zhang, Xiaoshun.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:215:y:2021:i:pb:s0360544220322374.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Chinas Belt & Road Initiative coal power cooperation: Transitioning toward low-carbon development. (2021). Lin, Boqiang ; Bega, Franois.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:156:y:2021:i:c:s0301421521003086.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Deep decarbonization in Northeastern North America: The value of electricity market integration and hydropower. (2021). Debia, Sebastien ; Pineau, Pierre-Olivier ; Rodriguez-Sarasty, Jesus A.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:152:y:2021:i:c:s0301421521000793.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Does the “NIMBY syndrome” undermine public support for nuclear power in Japan?. (2021). Song, Jaehyun ; Uji, Azusa ; Prakash, Aseem.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:148:y:2021:i:pa:s0301421520306558.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Credible Empowerment and Deliberative Participation: A Comparative Study of Two Nuclear Energy Policy Deliberation Cases in Korea. (2021). Lee, Taedong ; Shin, Sangbum.
    In: Review of Policy Research.
    RePEc:bla:revpol:v:38:y:2021:i:1:p:97-112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Risk Perception: Reflections on 40 Years of Research. (2020). Siegrist, Michael ; Arvai, Joseph.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:s1:p:2191-2206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Social Influence, Risk and Benefit Perceptions, and the Acceptability of Risky Energy Technologies: An Explanatory Model of Nuclear Power Versus Shale Gas. (2020). , Judith ; Schubert, Iljana ; Schweiger, Elisa.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:6:p:1226-1243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Global Warming Risk Perceptions in India. (2020). Smith, Nicholas ; Thaker, Jagadish ; Leiserowitz, Anthony.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:12:p:2481-2497.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Climate Change Risk Perceptions of Audiences in the Climate Change Blogosphere. (2020). van der Linden, Sander ; van Eck, Christel W ; Mulder, Bob C.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7990-:d:420318.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Values Influence Public Acceptability of Geoengineering Technologies Via Self-Identities. (2020). Schuitema, Geertje ; Moynihan, Andrew B.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4591-:d:367261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The Role of Hydrocarbons in the Global Energy Agenda: The Focus on Liquefied Natural Gas. (2020). Litvinenko, Vladimir.
    In: Resources.
    RePEc:gam:jresou:v:9:y:2020:i:5:p:59-:d:361148.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Individual preferences towards nuclear energy: the transient residency effect. (2020). kaya, ozgur ; Mourato, Susana ; Contu, Davide.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:103432.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Social acceptance of nuclear power plants in Korea: The role of public perceptions following the Fukushima accident. (2020). Jang, Yeonju ; Park, Eunil.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:128:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120301866.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. When saving the planet is worth more than avoiding destruction: The importance of message framing when speaking to egoistic individuals. (2020). Puntiroli, Michael ; Lagomarsino, Maria ; Lemarie, Linda.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:118:y:2020:i:c:p:162-176.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Environmental beliefs and public acceptance of nuclear energy in China: A moderated mediation analysis. (2020). Li, Yazhou ; Xu, Shuo ; Wang, Jing ; Gu, Jibao ; Wu, Jianlin.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:137:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519307281.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Complementing choice experiment with contingent valuation data: Individual preferences and views towards IV generation nuclear energy in the UK. (2020). Mourato, Susana ; Contu, Davide.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:136:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519306196.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Public Acceptance of Fully Automated Driving: Effects of Social Trust and Risk/Benefit Perceptions. (2019). Xu, Zhigang ; Yang, Run ; Liu, Peng.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:39:y:2019:i:2:p:326-341.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Chinese urban resident willingness to pay for green housing based on double-entry mental accounting theory. (2019). Cheng, Xiu ; Long, Ruyin ; Li, Qianwen.
    In: Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards.
    RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:95:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-018-3435-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Searching for the Next New Energy in Energy Transition: Comparing the Impacts of Economic Incentives on Local Acceptance of Fossil Fuels, Renewable, and Nuclear Energies. (2019). Kim, Seoyong ; Lee, Jae Eun.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:2037-:d:220308.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Exploring the role of cultural individualism and collectivism on public acceptance of nuclear energy. (2019). Wang, Yongliang ; Li, Yazhou ; He, Yanling ; Zhang, Tingting ; Gu, Jibao ; Xia, Dongqin.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:132:y:2019:i:c:p:208-215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. How projected electricity price and personal values influence support for a 50% renewable energy target in Australia. (2019). Phillips, Wendy J ; Hine, Donald W.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:853-860.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  51. Same or different? Insights on public perception and acceptance of carbon capture and storage or utilization in Germany. (2019). Ziefle, M ; Arning, K ; Sternberg, A ; Linzenich, A ; Kaetelhoen, A ; Bardow, A ; Heek, Offermann-Van J.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:125:y:2019:i:c:p:235-249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  52. Emotional Responses to Energy Projects: Insights for Responsible Decision Making in a Sustainable Energy Transition. (2018). Roeser, Sabine ; Huijts, Nicole ; Contzen, Nadja ; Steg, Linda ; Perlaviciute, Goda.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2526-:d:158747.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  53. The Roles of Three Types of Knowledge and Perceived Uncertainty in Explaining Risk Perception, Acceptability, and Self-Protective Response—A Case Study on Endocrine Disrupting Surfactants. (2018). Watanabe, Tsunemi ; Ho, Hien.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:296-:d:130927.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  54. Better late than never, but never late is better: Risk assessment of nuclear power construction projects. (2018). Schaeffer, R ; Ferreira, P ; Araujo, M ; Portugal-Pereira, J ; Cunha, J ; Szklo, A.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:120:y:2018:i:c:p:158-166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  55. The Role of Affect in Attitude Formation toward New Technologies: The Case of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection. (2017). Pnitzsch, Gert ; Merk, Christine.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:12:p:2289-2304.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  56. Nuclear Energy in Ghana? History, Science and Policy. (2017). Adoteye, Victor Nii ; Adu-Gyamfi, Samuel ; Amakye-Boateng, Kwasi ; Yartey, Henry Tettey ; Dramani, Aminu.
    In: Journal of Social and Development Sciences.
    RePEc:rnd:arjsds:v:8:y:2017:i:3:p:11-34.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  57. Changes in the Factors Influencing Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power Generation in Japan Since the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster. (2016). Shiotani, Takamasa ; Tsuchida, Shoji ; Tsujikawa, Norifumi.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:36:y:2016:i:1:p:98-113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  58. Offenders’ Risk‐Taking Attitude Inside and Outside the Prison Walls. (2014). Hanoch, Yaniv ; Gummerum, Michaela ; Rolison, Jonathan J.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:34:y:2014:i:10:p:1870-1881.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  59. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-29 21:38:29 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.