1. Spatial effects of the market-based energy allocation on energy efficiency: A quasi-natural experiment of energy quota trading. (2025). Du, Minzhe ; Wu, Fenger ; Liao, Liping ; Wang, Qiya ; Luo, Lichun.
   In: Energy.
   RePEc:eee:energy:v:318:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225005444.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Ai, H.; Tan, X.; Zhou, S.; Zhou, Y.; Xing, H. The impact of environmental regulation on carbon emissions: Evidence from China. Econ. Anal. Policy 2023, 80, 1067–1079. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Aidt, T.S.; Dutta, J. Transitional politics: Emerging incentive-based instruments in environmental regulation. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2004, 47, 458–479. [CrossRef]

3. Ashraf, N.; Sharma, S.; Aslam, S.; Aurangzeb, K. Making tradable white certificates trustworthy, anonymous, and efficient using blockchains. Energy Rep. 2023, 10, 4574–4581. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Borghesi, S.; Cainelli, G.; Mazzanti, M. Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Res. Policy 2015, 44, 669–683. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Brännlund, R.; Lundgren, T. Environmental policy without costs? A review of the Porter hypothesis. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2009, 3, 75–117. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Chen, Z.; Song, P.; Wang, B. Carbon emissions trading scheme, energy efficiency and rebound effect–Evidence from China’s provincial data. Energy Policy 2021, 157, 112507. [CrossRef]

7. Chu, X.; Du, G.; Geng, H.; Liu, X. Can energy quota trading reduce carbon intensity in China? A study using a DEA and decomposition approach. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 28, 1275–1285. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Cui, H.; Cao, Y. Energy rights trading policy, spatial spillovers, and energy utilization performance: Evidence from Chinese cities. Energy Policy 2024, 192, 114234. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Cui, L.; Chen, Z.; Huang, Y.; Yu, H. Window dressing: Changes in atmospheric pollution at boundaries in response to regional environmental policy in China. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2024, 125, 102948. [CrossRef]
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Du, M.; Wu, F.; Ye, D.; Zhao, Y.; Liao, L. Exploring the effects of energy quota trading policy on carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Energy Econ. 2023, 124, 106791. [CrossRef]

11. Feng, Z.; Chen, W. Environmental regulation, green innovation, and industrial green development: An empirical analysis based on the Spatial Durbin model. Sustainability 2018, 10, 223. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. Friedler, F. Process integration, modelling and optimization for energy saving and pollution reduction. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2010, 30, 2270–2280. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Fu, L.P.; Li, Y.H. Local Official Promotion Competition, Personal Characteristics and Corporate Investment Efficiency—An Empirical Analysis Based on Panel Data of 779 Listed Companies in China. Manag. Mod. 2015, 35, 40–42.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Gao, S.; Liang, L.L.; Jiang, X. Characteristics of spatial correlation network of carbon emission in counties based on nighttime light data—A case study of Jilin Province. J. Environ. Sci. 2024, 9, 1–13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Guo, L.; Wang, Y. How does government environmental regulation “unlock” carbon emission effect?—Evidence from China. Chin. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 2018, 16, 232–241. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Hong, Q.; Cui, L.; Hong, P. The impact of carbon emissions trading on energy efficiency: Evidence from quasi-experiment in China’s carbon emissions trading pilot. Energy Econ. 2022, 110, 106025. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Huang, X.; Tian, P. How does heterogeneous environmental regulation affect net carbon emissions: Spatial and threshold analysis for China. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 330, 117161. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Ji, Z.; Zhou, L.A.; Wang, P.; Zhao, Y. Promotion incentives of local officials and bank lending: Evidence from China’s city commercial banks. J. Financ. Res. 2014, 1, 1–15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Jiang, P.; Li, M.; Zhao, Y.; Gong, X.; Jin, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, L. Does Environmental Regulation Improve Carbon Emission Efficiency? Inspection of Panel Data from Inter-Provincial Provinces in China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10448. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Johnstone, N.; Managi, S.; Rodríguez, M.C.; Haščič, I.; Fujii, H.; Souchier, M. Environmental policy design, innovation and efficiency gains in electricity generation. Energy Econ. 2017, 63, 106–115. [CrossRef]

21. Li, L.; Wang, S.; Wu, J.; Sun, Z. Exploring the efficacy of renewable energy support policies in uncertain environments: A real options analysis. Energy Econ. 2024, 132, 107467. [CrossRef]

22. Li, M. Using the propensity score method to estimate causal effects: A review and practical guide. Organ. Res. Methods 2013, 16, 188–226. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Liu, C.J.; Zhao, X.M. Is there any industrial heterogeneity in the strong “Porter Hypothesis”?—Based on the perspective of industrial carbon intensity. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2017, 27, 1–9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Liu, X.; Wu, H.; Yang, C.; Albitar, K. The impact of the new energy demonstration city construction on energy consumption intensity: Exploring the sustainable potential of China’s firms. Energy 2023, 283, 128716. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Liu, Y.; Liu, S.; Shao, X.; He, Y. Policy spillover effect and action mechanism for environmental rights trading on green innovation: Evidence from China’s carbon emissions trading policy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 153, 111779. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. Liu, Z.; Sun, H. Assessing the impact of emissions trading scheme on low-carbon technological innovation: Evidence from China. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2021, 89, 106589. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. Liu, Z.Y.; Zhang, S.S. Spatial and temporal evolution of carbon emissions from energy consumption in Chinese urban agglomerations based on nighttime lighting data and the factors affecting them. Ecol. Econ. 2024, 40, 23–31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Lu, W.; Wu, H.; Yang, S.; Tu, Y.P. Effect of environmental regulation policy synergy on carbon emissions in China under consideration of the mediating role of industrial structure. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 322, 116053. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Mundaca, L. Markets for energy efficiency: Exploring the implications of an EU-wide ‘Tradable White Certificate’ scheme. Energy 2008, 30, 3016–3043. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Mundaca, L.; McCormick, K. Energy Policy Instruments and Innovation: How can tradable permit schemes influence innovation processes? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovation, Sustainability and Policy, Kloster Seeon, Germany, May 2004; pp. 23–25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Mundaca, L.; Neij, L. A multi-criteria evaluation framework for tradable white certificate schemes. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 4557–4573. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Pan, Y.; Dong, F. Design of energy use rights trading policy from the perspective of energy vulnerability. Energy Policy 2022, 160, 112668. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2024, 16, 8357 16 of 17

33. Pan, Y.; Dong, F. Green finance policy coupling effect of fossil energy use rights trading and renewable energy certificates trading on low carbon economy: Taking China as an example. Econ. Anal. Policy 2023, 77, 658–679. [CrossRef]

34. Pei, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, X.; Cao, J. Environmental regulation and carbon emission: The mediation effect of technical efficiency. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117599. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

35. Popp, D. Pollution control innovations and the Clean Air Act of 1990. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 2003, 22, 641–660. [CrossRef]

36. Pu, S.; Ouyang, Y. Can carbon emission trading policy promote green innovation? The perspective of corporate operating difficulties. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 420, 138473. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Qi, X.; Han, Y. Energy quota trading can achieve energy savings and emission reduction: Evidence from China’s pilots. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 52431–52458. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

38. Sinn, H.W. Public policies against global warming: A supply side approach. Int. Tax Publ. Financ. 2008, 15, 360–394. [CrossRef]

39. Tan, X.; Sun, Q.; Wang, M.; Cheong, T.S.; Shum, W.Y.; Huang, J. Assessing the effects of emissions trading systems on energy consumption and energy mix. Appl. Energy 2022, 310, 118583. [CrossRef]

40. Wang, H.; Liu, C.; Shi, P.; Wang, Y. The social effects of energy regulation: Energy-consuming rights trading system and corporate labor demand. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 366, 121842. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Sustainability 2024, 16, 8357 17 of 17
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Wang, K.; Su, X.; Wang, S. How does the energy-consuming rights trading policy affect China’s carbon emission intensity? Energy 2023, 276, 127579. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

42. Wang, R.; Liu, W.; Xiao, L.; Liu, J.; Kao, W. Path towards achieving of China’s 2020 carbon emission reduction target—A discussion of low-carbon energy policies at province level. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 2740–2747. [CrossRef]

43. Wang, W.; Wang, J.; Wu, H. The impact of energy-consuming rights trading on green total factor productivity in the context of digital economy: Evidence from listed firms in China. Energy Econ. 2024, 131, 107342. [CrossRef]

44. Wei, Y.; Du, M.; Huang, Z. The effects of energy quota trading on total factor productivity and economic potential in industrial sector: Evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 445, 141227. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

45. Wu, X.; Gao, M.; Guo, S.; Maqbool, R. Environmental and economic effects of sulfur dioxide emissions trading pilot scheme in China: A quasi-experiment. Energy Environ. 2019, 30, 1255–1274. [CrossRef]

46. Yan, Q.; Wan, K. Energy-Consuming Right Trading Policy and Corporate ESG Performance: Quasi-Natural Experimental Evidence from China. Energies (19961073) 2024, 17, 3257. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
47. Yang, G.; Zha, D.; Wang, X.; Chen, Q. Exploring the nonlinear association between environmental regulation and carbon intensity in China: The mediating effect of green technology. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 114, 106309. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Yi, L.; Bai, N.; Yang, L.; Li, Z.; Wang, F. Evaluation on the effectiveness of China’s pilot carbon market policy. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 246, 119039. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. Yu, X.; Wan, K.; Du, Q. Can carbon market policies achieve a “point-to-surface” effect?—Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Energy Policy 2023, 183, 113803. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Zhang, X.; Löschel, A.; Lewis, J.; Zhang, D.; Yan, J. Emissions trading systems for global low carbon energy and economic transformation. Appl. Energy 2020, 279, 115858. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Can China’s carbon market policy promote inter-city green collaborative innovation?. (2025). Yang, Yang ; Ma, Guangcheng.
   In: Energy Economics.
   RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:144:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325002221.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The Effect of Energy Rights Trading Pilot Policies on Urban Carbon Emissions: Empirical Analysis Based on PSM-DID. (2024). Wan, Kai ; Zhang, Baosheng.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8357-:d:1485992.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Looking for winning policies to address the climate issue in EU-aviation. (2024). Proost, Stef.
   In: Journal of Air Transport Management.
   RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:115:y:2024:i:c:s0969699723001771.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Does democracy protect the environment? The role of the Arctic Council. (2023). Popova, Olga ; Mavisakalyan, Astghik ; Otrachshenko, Vladimir.
   In: Climatic Change.
   RePEc:spr:climat:v:176:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s10584-023-03511-6.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Optimal sustainability investment and pricing decisions in a two-echelon supply chain with emissions-sensitive demand under cap-and-trade policy. (2022). Ray, Ishani ; Giri, Bibhas C.
   In: OPSEARCH.
   RePEc:spr:opsear:v:59:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s12597-021-00569-7.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Can Carbon Emission Trading Policy Reduce PM2.5? Evidence from Hubei, China. (2022). Ma, Xin ; Wang, Ruiqi ; Tang, Huanchen.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10755-:d:900753.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Pollution for Sale: Firms’ Characteristics and Lobbying Outcome. (2020). Cai, Dapeng ; Li, Jie.
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:77:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-020-00507-z.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Pricing Pollution. (2020). Mideksa, Torben.
   In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
   RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8269.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Price Effects, Inefficient Environmental Policy, and Windfall Profits. (2019). Goodkind, Andrew ; Wang, Zhiyu ; Coggins, Jay S ; Nguyen, Jason.
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:72:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-018-0217-0.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Public acceptance of incentive-based spatial planning policies: A framing experiment. (2018). Lutz, Philipp ; Pleger, Lyn E ; Sager, Fritz.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:73:y:2018:i:c:p:225-238.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Rent creation and rent seeking in environmental policy. (2017). MacKenzie, Ian.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:171:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-017-0401-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Policies for a More Dematerialized EU Economy. Theoretical Underpinnings, Political Context and Expected Feasibility. (2016). Bigano, Andrea ; Zotti, Jacopo ; Niegocki, Aleksander.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:8:p:717-:d:74861.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Prices versus quantities with distributional rent seeking. (2015). MacKenzie, Ian.
    In: Discussion Papers Series.
    RePEc:qld:uq2004:548.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Regulation versus taxation. (2014). Passarelli, Francesco ; Alesina, Alberto.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:110:y:2014:i:c:p:147-156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. How do electoral competition and special interests shape the stringency of renewable energy standards?. (2012). Urpelainen, Johannes.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:14:y:2012:i:1:p:23-34.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Cap-and-trade, taxes, and distributional conflict. (2012). Ohndorf, Markus ; MacKenzie, Ian.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:63:y:2012:i:1:p:51-65.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Electoral competition with environmental policy as a second best transfer. (2011). Kawahara, Shinya .
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:33:y:2011:i:3:p:477-495.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Goals and Principles of Environmental Policy. (2010). Zylicz, Tomasz.
    In: International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:now:jirere:101.00000028.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Dynamics of Environmental Regulation and Voters’ Biased Beliefs: A Political Economy Approach. (2010). .
    In: Atlantic Economic Journal.
    RePEc:kap:atlecj:v:38:y:2010:i:4:p:399-409.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Green taxes: Refunding rules and lobbying. (2010). Aidt, Toke.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:60:y:2010:i:1:p:31-43.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. The General Equilibrium Incidence of Environmental Mandates. (2010). Heutel, Garth ; Fullerton, Don.
    In: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy.
    RePEc:aea:aejpol:v:2:y:2010:i:3:p:64-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Is a Double Dividend Better than a Single Dividend?. (2009). Lai, Yu-Bong.
    In: Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE).
    RePEc:mhr:jinste:urn:sici:0932-4569(200906)165:2_342:iaddbt_2.0.tx_2-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Public Benefits, Private Benefits, and Policy Mechanism Choice for Land-Use Change for Environmental Benefits. (2008). Pannell, David.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:84:y:2008:i:2:p:225-240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Multiple instruments to change energy behaviour: The emperors new clothes?. (2008). Bye, Torstein ; Bruvoll, Annegrete.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ssb:dispap:549.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Redealing the cards: How an eco-industry modifies the political economy of environmental taxes. (2008). Canton, Joan.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:30:y:2008:i:3:p:295-315.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Investment in risky R&D programs in the face of climate uncertainty. (2008). Adu-Bonnah, Kwame ; Baker, Erin.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:30:y:2008:i:2:p:465-486.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. The General Equilibrium Incidence of Environmental Mandates. (2007). Heutel, Garth ; Fullerton, Don.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:13645.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Lessons Relearned: Can Previous Research on Incentive-Based Mechanisms Point the Way for Payments for Ecosystem Services?. (2007). Sims, Katharine ; Jack, Kelsey B ; Kousky, Carolyn.
    In: CID Working Papers.
    RePEc:cid:wpfacu:15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Do Autocratic States Trade Less?. (2007). Gassebner, Martin ; Aidt, Toke.
    In: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cam:camdae:0742.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Regulation by Prices, Quantities, or Both: A Review of Instrument Choice. (2006). Hepburn, Cameron.
    In: Oxford Review of Economic Policy.
    RePEc:oup:oxford:v:22:y:2006:i:2:p:226-247.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Pollution Tax under Lobbying Duopolists. (2005). Honma, Satoshi.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:kyu:dpaper:22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. The Role of Transaction Costs and Risk Premia in the Determination of Climate Change Policy Responses. (2003). Taylor, Timothy ; Eckermann, Frauke ; Hunt, Alistair ; Stronzik, Marcus.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:1381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-21 15:07:04 || Missing content? Let us know