Aghion, P.; Hemous, D.; Veugelers, R. No Green Growth without Innovation, Bruegel Policy Brief-2009/07. 2009. Available online: https://www.bruegel.org/policy-brief/no-green-growth-without-innovation (accessed on 15 February 2024).
- Aldy, J.E.; Stavins, R.N. The promise and problems of pricing carbon: Theory and experience. J. Environ. Dev. 2012, 21, 152–180. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Available online: https://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/support/technical-papers/hierarchical-bayes-estimation/cbchb -technical-paper-2009 (accessed on 30 June 2023).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Backhaus, K.; Erichson, B.; Weiber, R. Fortgeschrittene Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine Anwendungsorientierte Einführung [Advanced Multivariate Analysis Methods: An Application-Oriented Introduction]; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Baier, D.; Brusch, M. Conjointanalyse: Methoden-Anwendungen-Praxisbeispiele [Conjoint Analysis: Methods-Applications-Practical Examples]; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Baranzini, A.; Carattini, S. Effectiveness; earmarking, and labeling: Testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data, Environ. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 2017, 19, 197–227. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Barckhausen, A.; Becker, J.; Dütschke, E.; Piria, R.; Preuß, S.; Wilkowska, W.; Ziefle, M. Akzeptanz und Kommunikation eines CO2-Bepreisungssystems [Acceptance and Communication of a CO2 Pricing System]; Adelphi Research gGmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2022.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Beierlein, C.; Kemper, C.J.; Kovaleva, A.; Rammstedt, B. PEKS—Political Efficacy Kurzskala [Manual]. In Leibniz-Zentrum für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation (ZPID); Elektronisches Testarchiv; ZPID: Trier, Germany, 2012. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Beiser-McGrath, L.F.; Bernauer, T. Could revenue recycling make effective carbon taxation politically feasible? Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaax3323. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Beuermann, C.; Santarius, T. Ecological tax reform in Germany: Handling two hot potatoes at the same time. Energy Policy 2006, 34, 917–929. [CrossRef]
- Bohdanowicz, Z. Different countries, common support for climate change mitigation: The case of Germany and Poland. Climate 2021, 9, 27. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- bpb.de. Bevölkerung Nach Bundesländern. 14 January 2022. Available online: https://www.bpb.de/kurz-knapp/zahlen-undfakten /soziale-situation-in-deutschland/61535/bevoelkerung-nach-bundeslaendern/ (accessed on 5 April 2024). Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bristow, A.L.; Wardman, M.; Zanni, A.M.; Chintakayala, P.K. Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1824–1837. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Brundtland, G.H. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development; UN-Document A/42/427; WCED: Geneva, Switzerland, 1987.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bundesministerium der Justiz [Federal Ministry of Justice]. Brennstoffemissionshandelsgesetz [German Fuel Emissions Trading Act] 10 as by 12th of December 2019 (BGBl. I S. 2728). Available online: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/behg/BJNR27280
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend [Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth]. Weitere Entlastungen Unterstützen Familien ab Januar 2023 spürbar. [Further Relief Will Significantly Support Families from January 2023]. 2022. Available online: https://www.bmfsfj.de/bmfsfj/aktuelles/alle-meldungen/ weitere-entlastungen-unterstuetzen-familien-ab-januar-2023-spuerbar-208100#:~:text=Januar%202023%20um%20561%20 Euro,Kilometer%20gestiegen (accessed on 30 June 2023).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (BMU). Klimaschutz in Zahlen: Fakten, Trends und Impulse deutscher Klimapolitik. [Climate Protection in Figures: Facts, Trends and Impulses of German Climate Policy]; Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Nukleare Sicherheit (BMU): Berlin, Germany, 2020.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Carattini, S.; Baranzini, A.; Lalive, R. Is taxing waste a waste of time? Evidence from a supreme court decision. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 148, 131–151. [CrossRef]
- Carattini, S.; Baranzini, A.; Thalmann, P.; Varone, F.; Vöhringer, F. Green taxes in a post-Paris world: Are millions of nays inevitable? Environ. Resour. Econ. 2017, 68, 97–128. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Carattini, S.; Carvalho, M.; Frankhauser, S. How to Make Carbon Taxes more Acceptable; Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science: London, UK, 2017; 57p.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Carattini, S.; Carvalho, M.; Frankhauser, S. Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes. WIREs Clim. Chang. 2018, 9, e531. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clinch, J.P.; Dunne, L. Environmental tax reform: An assessment of social responses in Ireland. Energy Policy 2006, 34, 950–959. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- De Groot, J.I.; Schuitema, G. How to make the unpopular popular? Policy characteristics, social norms and the acceptability of environmental policies. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 19, 100–107. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dentler, K.; Bluemke, M.; Gabriel, O.W. German Satisfaction with the Political System Short Scale (SPS). In Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS); ZIS—GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences: Mannheim, Germany, 2020. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Drews, S.; Van den Bergh, J.C. What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Clim. Policy 2016, 16, 855–876. [CrossRef]
Dütschke, E.; Preuß, S.; Brunzema, I.; Piria, R. Using the Revenues from Carbon Pricing—Insights into the Acceptance and Perceptions of Affected Groups. Energy Policy 2023, 175, 13468. [CrossRef]
- Feldhaus, P.; Fuerstenwerth, D.; Gohl, M.; Schroeter, B.; Vahlenkamp, T. Transformation of Europe’s Power System until 2050 Including Specific Considerations for Germany Electric Power and Natural Gas Practice; McKinsey: Chicago, IL, USA, 2010.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Finuncane, M.L.; Alhakami, A.; Slovic, P.; Johnson, S.M. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 2000, 13, 1–17. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fitzgerald, J.; Wolak, J. The roots of trust in local government in western Europe. Int. Political Sci. Rev. 2016, 37, 130–146. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Friedl, C.; Reichl, J. Realizing energy infrastructure projects—A qualitative empirical analysis of local practices to address social acceptance. Energy Policy 2016, 89, 184–193. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gevrek, Z.E.; Uyduranoglu, A. Public preferences for carbon tax attributes. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 118, 186–197. [CrossRef]
Gough, I.; Abdallah, S.; Johnson, V.; Ryan-Collins, J.; Smith, C. The Distribution of total Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Householfs in the UK, and Some Implications for Social Policy. LSE STICERD Research Paper 152. 2011. Available online: https://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1935761 (accessed on 19 February 2024).
- Green, P.E.; Rao, V.R. Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. J. Mark. Res. 1971, 8, 355–363. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gustafsson, A.; Herrmann, A.; Huber, F. Conjoint Analysis as an Instrument of Market Research Practice. In Conjoint Measurement; Gustafsson, A., Herrmann, A., Huber, F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; pp. 5–46. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hammar, H.; Jagers, S.C. Can trust in politicians explain individuals’ support for climate policy? The case of CO2 tax. Clim. Policy 2006, 5, 613–625. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hammar, H.; Jagers, S.C. Is there a trade-off between cost-effective climate policies and political legitimacy? In From Kyoto to the Town Hall; Routledge: London, UK, 2013; pp. 57–72.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hammar, H.; Jagers, S.C. What is a fair CO2 tax increase? On fair emission reductions in the transport sector. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61, 377–387. [CrossRef]
- Harring, N.; Jagers, S.C.; Matti, S. Public support for pro-environmental policy measures: Examining the impact of personal values and ideology. Sustainability 2017, 9, 679. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Heek, J.O.-V.; Arning, K.; Linzenich, A.; Ziefle, M. Trust and Distrust in Carbon Capture and Utilization Industry as Relevant Factors for the Acceptance of Carbon-Based Products. Front. Energy Res. 2018, 6. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2001.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jagers, S.C.; Lachapelle, E.; Martinsson, J.; Matti, S. Bridging the ideological gap? How fairness perceptions mediate the effect of revenue recycling on public support for carbon taxes in the United States, Canada and Germany. Rev. Policy Res. 2021, 38, 529–554. [CrossRef]
- Kallbekken, S.; Aasen, M. The demand for earmarking: Results from a focus group study. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 2183–2190. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kallbekken, S.; Kroll, S.; Cherry, T.L. Do you not like Pigou, or do you not understand him? Tax aversion and revenue recycling in the lab. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2011, 62, 53–64. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kallbekken, S.; Sælen, H. Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 2966–2973. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kannapin, O. Prädiktormuster Selbstberichteten Umweltverhaltens [Predictor Patterns of Self-Reported Environmental Behaviour]; Staatsund Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky: Hamburg, Germany, 2000.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kluge, J.; Heek, J.O.-V.; Ziefle, M. How Will I Know about Local Energy Projects? A Conjoint-Analysis of Communication Preferences in Germany. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 75, 102016. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Krampen, G.; Ronco, C.; Martini, M. Analysen Umweltbewußten Handelns in Italien und Deutschland Anhand des Handlungstheoretischen Partialmodells der Persönlichkeit; Univ., Fachbereich I.: Trier, Germany, 1993. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43 645430 (accessed on 7 February 2024).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lemken, D.; Kraus, K.; Nitzko, S.; Spiller, A. Staatliche Eingriffe in die Lebensmittelwahl: Welche klimapolitischen Instrumente unterstützt die Bevölkerung [Government intervention in food choices: Which climate policy instruments does the public support?]? GAIA Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 2018, 27, 363–372. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Luce, R.D.; Tukey, J.W. Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. J. Math. Psychol. 1964, 1, 1–27. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Maestre-Andrés, S.; Drews, S.; Savin, I.; den Bergh, J.V. Carbon tax acceptability with information provision and mixed revenue uses. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 7017. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Sustainability 2024, 16, 3378 28 of 29
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Maestre-Andrés, S.; Drews, S.; van den Bergh, J. Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: A review of the literature. Clim. Policy 2019, 19, 1186–1204. [CrossRef]
Marcantonini, C.; Ellerman, A.D. The Implicit Carbon Price of Renewable Energy Incentives in Germany; RSCAS Working Paper 2014/28; European University Institute: Fiesole, Italy, 2014. [CrossRef]
- Mattauch, L.; Sommer, S.; Pahle, M. Supporting Carbon Taxes: The Role of Fairness; INET Oxford Working Papers 2020-23; Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford: Oxford, UK, 2020.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Matthies, E.; Becker, A.; Bobeth, S. CO2-Bepreisung zwischen wirkungsvollem Instrument und Überforderung? Eine Pilotstudie zu Bedingungen der Akzeptabilität [CO2 pricing between effective instrument and excessive demand? A pilot study on conditions of acceptability]. GAIA Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 2020, 29, 249–257. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Merten, M.J.; Becker, A.C.; Matthies, E. What explains German consumers’ acceptance of carbon pricing? Examining the roles of pro-environmental orientation and consumer coping style. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2022, 85, 102367. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Miroshnik, V. Culture and international management: A review. J. Manag. Dev. 2002, 21, 521–544. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nielsson, A.; Biel, A. Acceptance of climate change policy measures: Role framing and value guidance. Eur. Environ. 2008, 18, 203–215. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Orme, B. Interpreting the Results of Conjoint Analysis, Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research; Research Publishers: Madison, WI, USA, 2010; pp. 77–88.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Osgood, C.E.; Suci, G.J.; Tannenbaum, P.H. The Measurement of Meaning; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 1957.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pigou, A.C. The Economics of Welfare; Routledge: London, UK, 2017. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Poortinga, W.; Whitmarsh, L.; Steg, L.; Böhm, G.; Fisher, S. Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants: A cross-European analysis. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2019, 55, 25–35. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Purvis, B.; Mao, Y.; Robinson, D. Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustain. Sci. 2019, 14, 681–695. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rao, V.R. Applied Conjoint Analysis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014. [CrossRef]
- Seghezzo, L. The five dimensions of sustainability. Environ. Politics 2009, 18, 539–556. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2024, 16, 3378 27 of 29
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Simons, L.; Engelmann, L.; Arning, K.; Ziefle, M. Two sides of the same coin—Explaining the acceptance of CO2-based fuels for aviation using PLS-SEM by considering the production and product evaluation. Front. Energy Res. 2021, 9, 742109. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sommer, S.; Mattauch, L.; Pahle, M. Supporting carbon taxes: The role of fairness. Ecol. Econ. 2022, 195, 107359. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Statistisches Bundesamt. Bevölkerung Nach Altersgruppen (ab 2011). 20 June 2023. Available online: https://www.destatis.de/ DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsstand/Tabellen/liste-altersgruppen.html#249808 (accessed on 5 April 2024).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Statistisches Bundesamt. Bevölkerung Nach Nationalität und Geschlecht. Available online: https://www.destatis.de/DE/ Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsstand/Tabellen/deutsche-nichtdeutsche-bevoelkerung-nachgeschlecht -deutschland.html (accessed on 5 April 2024). Sustainability 2024, 16, 3378 29 of 29
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Statistisches Bundesamt. Einkommen, Einnahmen und Ausgaben privater Haushalte in Deutschland. 2 December 2022. Available online: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Einkommen-Konsum-Lebensbedingungen/EinkommenEinnahmen -Ausgaben/Tabellen/deutschland-lwr.html (accessed on 8 April 2024).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sterner, T. Fuel Taxes and the Poor: The Distributional Effects of Gasoline Taxation and Their Implications for Climate Policy; Routledge: London, UK, 2012; ISBN 9781138184237.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Stiglitz, J.E.; Stern, N.; Duan, M.; Edenhofer, O.; Giraud, G.; Heal, G.; La Rovere, E.; Morris, A.; Moyer, E.; Pangestu, M. Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices; International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and International Development Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Thalmann, P. The public acceptance of green taxes: 2 million voters express their opinion. Public Choice 2004, 119, 179–217. [CrossRef]
- Umweltbundesamt [Federal Environmental Ministry]. CO2-Bepreisung im Verkehrs- und Gebäudebereich Sozialverträglich Gestalten. Herausforderungen, Strategien, Instrumente. 2022. Available online: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/ default/files/medien/1410/publikationen/2022-12-07_climate-change_47-2022_co2-bepreisung_verkehrs-gebaeudebereich_ sozialvertraeglich.pdf (accessed on 5 January 2024).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Watari, T.; Nansai, K.; Nakajima, K.; Giurco, D. Sustainable Energy Transitions Require Enhanced Resource Governance. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 312, 127698. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Weitzman, M.L. Voting on prices vs. voting on quantities in a world climate assembly. Res. Econ. 2017, 71, 199–211. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wolf, I. Soziales Nachhaltigkeitsbarometer der Energiewende 2019: Kernaussagen und Zusammenfassung der wesentlichen Ergebnisse [Social Sustainability Barometer of the Energiewende 2019: Key Statements and Summary of the Key Results]; IASS: Potsdam, Germany, 2020. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Zaunbrecher, B.S.; Ziefle, M. Integrating acceptance-relevant factors into wind power planning: A discussion. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2016, 27, 307–314. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ziegler, A. The relevance of attitudinal factors for the acceptance of energy policy measures: A micro-econometric analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 157, 129–140. [CrossRef]