Abman, R.; Lundberg, C.; Ruta, M. The effectiveness of environmental provisions in regional trade agreements. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 2024, 22, 2507â2548. [CrossRef]
Aichele, R.; Felbermayr, G. Kyoto and Carbon Leakage: An Empirical Analysis of the Carbon Content of Bilateral Trade. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2015, 97, 104â115. [CrossRef]
- Al Mamun, M.; Ehsanullah, S. Does the Paris Agreement Matter for CO2 Emissions in Middle-Income Countries? arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.14946.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Al Mamun, T.G.M.; Ehsanullah, H.M.S.; Amin, M.B.; Oláh, J. Has the Paris Agreement shaped emission trends? A panel VECM analysis of energy, growth, and CO2 in 106 middle-income countries. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2503.14946.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Aldy, J.E.; Stavins, R.N. The promise and problems of pricing carbon: Theory and experience. J. Environ. Dev. 2012, 21, 152â180. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
André, F.J.; Finus, M. Endogenous learning in international environmental agreements: The impact of research spillovers and the degree of cooperation. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 2024, 76, 877â900. [CrossRef]
- Ari, I.; Isik, M. Assessing the Performance of the Developing Countries for the Utilization of the Green Climate Fund. Front. Clim. 2022, 4, 813406. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Asheim, G.B.; Fæhn, T.; Nyborg, K.; Greaker, M.; Hagem, C.; Harstad, B.; Hoel, M.O.; Lund, D.; Rosendahl, K.E. The case for a supply-side climate treaty. Science 2019, 365, 325â327. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Asheim, G.B.; Foryn, C.B.; Hovi, J.; Menz, F.C. Regional versus global cooperation for climate control. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2006, 51, 93â109. [CrossRef]
- Associated Press. G7 Nations Commit to Phasing Out Coal by 2035 but Give Japan Some Flexibility; Associated Press: New York, NY, USA, 2024.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Aunan, K.; Berntsen, T.; OâConnor, D.; Persson, T.H.; Vennemo, H.; Zhai, F. Benefits and costs to China of a climate policy. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2007, 12, 471â497. [CrossRef]
Böhringer, C.M.; Carbone, J.C.; Rutherford, T.F. Unilateral climate policy design: Efficiency and equity implications of alternative instruments to reduce carbon leakage. Energy Econ. 2012, 34, 208â217. [CrossRef]
Baksi, S.; Ray Chaudhuri, A. Imperfect Competition, Border Carbon Adjustments, and Stability of a Global Climate Agreement; Departmental Working Papers 2020-03; The University of Winnipeg, Department of Economics: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2020; pp. 1â25. Sustainability 2025, 17, 6256 27 of 27
- Barrett, S. Consensus treaties. J. Inst. Theor. Econ. 2002, 158, 529â547. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Barrett, S. Coordination vs. voluntarism and enforcement in sustaining international environmental cooperation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 14515â14522. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2025, 17, 6256 25 of 27
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Barrett, S. Dikes versus windmills: Climate treaties and adaptation. Clim. Change Econ. 2020, 11, 2040005. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Barrett, S. Environment and Statecraft; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2003.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Barrett, S. International cooperation and the international commons. Duke Environ. Law Policy Forum 1999, 10, 131â146.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Barrett, S. Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 1994, 46, 878â894. [CrossRef]
- Barrett, S. Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2007.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Baumeister, R.; Leary, M. Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 1997, 1, 311â320. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Biancalani, F.; Gnecco, G.; Metulini, R.; Riccaboni, M. The impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon dioxide emissions: A matrix completion analysis. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 19676. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Biancardi, M.; Villani, G. International environmental agreements with asymmetric countries. Comput. Econ. 2010, 36, 69â92. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Blondeel, M.; Van de Graaf, T.; Haesebrouck, T. Moving beyond coal: Exploring and explaining the powering past coal alliance. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020, 59, 101304. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bodansky, D. The legal character of the Paris Agreement. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 2016, 25, 142â150. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Brandi, C.; Schwab, J.; Berger, A.; Morin, J.F. Do environmental provisions in trade agreements make exports from developing countries greener? World Dev. 2020, 129, 104899. [CrossRef]
Carfora, A.; Scandurra, G. The impact of climate funds on economic growth and their role in substituting fossil energy sources. Energy Policy 2019, 129, 182â192. [CrossRef]
- Carraro, C.; Eyckmans, J.; Finus, M. Optimal transfers and participation decisions in international environmental agreements. Rev. Int. Organ. 2006, 1, 379â396. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Carraro, C.; Siniscalco, D. Strategies for the international protection of the environment. J. Public Econ. 1993, 52, 309â328. [CrossRef]
- Chamon, M.; Klok, E.; Thakoor, V.; Jeromin, Z. Debt-for-Climate Swaps: Analysis, Design, and Implementation (IMF Working Paper 2022/162); IMF: Washington, DC, USA, 2022.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chasek, P.S.; Downie, D.L. Global Environmental Politics; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2021.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Döbbeling-Hildebrandt, N.; Miersch, K.; Khanna, T.M.; Bachelet, M.; Bruns, S.B.; Callaghan, M.; Edenhofer, O.; Flachsland, C.; Forster, P.M.; Minx, J.C.; et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ex-post evaluations on the effectiveness of carbon pricing. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4147. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dockner, E.J.; Long, N.V. International pollution control: Cooperative versus non-cooperative strategies. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1993, 24, 13â29. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Edenhofer, O.; Jakob, M.; Creutzig, F.; Flachsland, C.; Fuss, S.; Kowarsch, M.; Lessman, K.; Mattauch, L.; Siegmeier, J.; Steckel, J.C. Closing the emission price gap. Glob. Environ. Change 2015, 31, 132â143. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Eichner, T.; Pethig, R. Is trade liberalization conducive to the formation of climate coalitions? Int. Tax Public Financ. 2015, 22, 932â955. [CrossRef]
- Eichner, T.; Pethig, R. Self-enforcing environmental agreements and international trade. J. Public Econ. 2013, 102, 37â50. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Eichner, T.; Pethig, R. Self-enforcing environmental agreements, trade, and demand- and supply-side mitigation policy. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2014, 1, 419â450.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Eicke, L.; Weko, S.; Apergi, M.; Marian, A. Pulling up the carbon ladder? Decarbonization, dependence, and third-country risks from the European carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 80, 102240. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ekins, P. How large a carbon tax is justified by the secondary benefits of CO2 abatement? Res. Energy Econ. 1996, 18, 161â187. [CrossRef]
Ekins, P. The secondary benefits of CO2 abatement: How much emission reduction do they justify? Ecol. Econ. 1996, 16, 13â24. [CrossRef]
Elboghdadly, N.; Finus, M. Strategic climate policy with endogenous plant location: The role of border carbon adjustments. J. Public Econ. Theory 2022, 24, 1267â1309. [CrossRef]
- Erdogdu, E. The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Opportunities and Challenges for Non-EU Countries. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 2025, 14, e70000. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Eyckmans, J.; Finus, M. Coalition formation in a global warming game: How the design of protocols affects the success of environmental treaty-making. Nat. Resour. Model. 2006, 19, 323â358. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Farrell, J.; Maskin, E. Renegotiation in repeated games. Games Econ. Behav. 1989, 99, 317â319. [CrossRef]
- Finus, M.; Furini, F. Global governance in the light of geoengineering: A shot in the dark? J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2023, 122,
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Finus, M.; McGinty, M. The Anti-paradox of Cooperation. Diversity May Pay! J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2019, 157, 541â559. [CrossRef]
Finus, M.; Rübbelke, D.T.G. Public good provision and ancillary benefits: The case of climate agreements. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2013, 56, 211â226. [CrossRef]
Fischer, C. Market power and output-based refunding of environmental policy revenues. Resour. Energy Econ. 2011, 33, 212â230. [CrossRef]
Froyn, C.B.; Hovi, J. A climate agreement with full participation. Econ. Lett. 2008, 99, 317â319. [CrossRef]
- Fujita, T. Pollution Abatement Investment Game under Uncertainty. In Globalization, Regional Economy, and Public Policy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; pp. 57â76.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fujita, T.; Takashima, N. Literature Review of Repeated Game Analyses on International Environmental Agreements. Soc. Political Econ. 2016, 83, 35â53.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gersbach, H.; Hummel, N. A development-compatible refunding scheme for a climate treaty. Resour. Energy Econ. 2016, 44, 139â168. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gersbach, H.; Requate, T. Emission taxes and optimal refunding schemes. J. Public Econ. 2004, 88, 713â725. [CrossRef]
- Grant, M.J.; Booth, A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf. Libr. J. 2009, 26, 91â108. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Green, J. Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 043004. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Green, J. Donât link carbon markets. Nature 2017, 543, 484â486. [CrossRef]
- Grubb, M.; Brewer, T.L. Climate Policy and Industrial Competitiveness: Ten Insights from Europe on the EU Emissions Trading System; Climate and Energy Paper Series; The German Marshall Fund of the United States: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hagem, C.; Hoel, M.; Sterner, T. Refunding emission payments: Output-based versus expenditure-based refunding. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2020, 77, 641â667. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hagen, A.; Schneider, J. Trade sanctions and the stability of climate coalitions. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2021, 109, 102504. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Heras, A. Supply-side climate policy and fossil fuels in developing countries: A neo-Gramscian perspective. Int. Environ. Agreem. 2024, 14, 49â74. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hoel, M. International Environmental Conventions: The Case of Uniform Reductions of Emissions. Environ. Resour. Econ. 1992, 2, 141â159. [CrossRef]
- IPCC. Fifth Assessment Report; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Janzwood, A.; Harrison, K. The political economy of fossil fuel production in the Post-Paris Era: Critically evaluating Nationally Determined Contributions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2023, 102, 103095. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Jia, Z.; Wen, S.; Wu, R. Synergistic effect of emission trading scheme and carbon tax: A CGE model-based study in China. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2025, 110, 107699. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S.; Rietig, K.; Scobie, M. Agency dynamics of International Environmental Agreements: Actors, contexts, and drivers. Int. Environ. Agreem. 2022, 22, 353â372. [CrossRef]
- Kollenbach, G. International Environmental Agreements and Black Technology. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2022, 82, 601â624. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Korpar, N.; Larch, M.; Stöllinger, R. The European carbon border adjustment mechanism: A small step in the right direction. Int. Econ. Econ. Policy 2023, 20, 95â138. [CrossRef]
Kuhn, T.; Pestow, R.; Zenker, A. Building Climate Coalitions on Preferential Free Trade Agreements. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2019, 74, 539â569. [CrossRef]
- Kuhn, T.; Pestow, R.; Zenker, A. Formation of climate coalitions and preferential free trade: The case for participation linkage. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 2023, 26, 479â502. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kuik, O.; Hofkes, M. Border adjustment for European emissions trading: Competitiveness and carbon leakage. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 1741â1748. [CrossRef]
- Lagouvardou, S.; Psaraftis, H.N. Implications of the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) on European container routes: A carbon leakage case study. Marit. Transp. Res. 2022, 3, 100059. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Li, Q.; Fujita, T. Transfers in international environmental agreements under heterogeneity. Appl. Econ. 2021, 53, 3899â3910. [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Fujita, T.; Zhang, Y. Supporting Environmental Agreements under Asymmetry and Minimum Participation Rule. Strateg. Behav. Environ. 2024, 10, 15â38. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Maamoun, N. The Kyoto protocol: Empirical evidence of a hidden success. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2019, 95, 227â256. [CrossRef]
- Maggi, G. Issue linkage. In The Handbook of Commercial Policy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 513â564.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
McGinty, M. International Environmental Agreements among Asymmetric Nations. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 2007, 59, 45â62. [CrossRef]
Millock, K.; Nauges, C. Ex post evaluation of an earmarked tax on air pollution. Land Econ. 2006, 82, 68â84. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2025, 17, 6256 26 of 27
- Morin, J.F.; Brandi, C.; Schwab, J. Environmental agreements as clubs: Evidence from a new dataset of trade provisions. Rev. Int. Organ. 2024, 19, 33â62. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mravcová, A. Assessing the Effectiveness of International Climate Agreements in Mitigating Global Warming. Stud. Ecol. Bioeth. 2025, 23, 51â62. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Newell, P.; Daley, F. Supply-side climate policy: A new frontier in climate governance. WIREs Clim. Change 2024, 15, e909. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Newell, P.; van Asselt, H.; Daley, F. Building a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty: Key elements. Earth Syst. Gov. 2022, 14, 100159. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Nkuiya, B. Stability of international environmental agreements under isoelastic utility. Resour. Energy Econ. 2020, 59, 101128. [CrossRef]
Nordhaus, W. Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. Am. Econ. Rev. 2015, 105, 1339â1370. [CrossRef]
- Nordhaus, W.D.; Boyer, J. Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming Policies; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2000.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- OECD. Effective Carbon Rates 2023: Pricing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Through Taxes and Emissions Trading; OECD Series on Carbon Pricing and Energy Taxation; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2023.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pouw, N.R.M.; Weikard, H.-P.; Howarth, R.B. Economic analysis of international environmental agreements: Lessons learnt 2000â2020. Int. Environ. Agreem. 2022, 22, 279â294. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ren, K.; Kong, Y.S.; Muhammad, I.; Khan, B.A.K. The Impact of the Voluntary Environmental Agreements on Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from the Prefectural-Level Data in China. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 833724. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Robinson, E.; Weisskopf, M. Bonn Pushes Tough Stand on Warming: U.S. Puts Pressure on 3 Allies to Drop 2nd Stiff Initiative. Washington Post, 8 June 1992.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schmalensee, R.; Stavins, R.N. The design of environmental markets: What have we learned from experience with cap and trade? Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 2017, 33, 572â588. [CrossRef]
Takashima, N. International environmental agreements with ancillary benefits: Repeated games analysis. Econ. Model. 2017, 61, 312â320. [CrossRef]
- Takashima, N. International environmental agreements with the formation of multiple coalitions. Appl. Econ. Lett. 2021, 30, 524â530. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Takashima, N. Self-enforcing international environmental agreements with third-party organizations: Initial payment, technological development, and refunding. Econ. Lett. 2023, 228, 111164. [CrossRef]
- Takashima, N. The impact of accidental deviation by natural disaster-prone countries on renegotiation-proof climate change agreements. Environ. Model. Assess. 2016, 22, 345â361. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Cumulative Impacts Research; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2025.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- UNEP. Emissions Gap Report 2020; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya, 2020.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- UNFCCC. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twentieth session. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the Parties (COP 20), Lima, Peru, 1â12 December 2014.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
van Asselt, H.; Newell, P. Pathways to an international agreement to leave fossil fuels in the ground. Glob. Environ. Politics 2022, 22, 28â47. [CrossRef]
- van der Pol, T.; Weikard, H.-P.; van Ierland, E. Can altruism stabilise international climate agreements? Ecol. Econ. 2012, 81, 112â120. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wilbanks, T.J.; Kane, S.M.; Leiby, P.N.; Perlack, R.D.; Settle, C.; Shogren, J.F.; Smith, J.B. Possible responses to global climate change: Integrating mitigation and adaptation. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 2003, 45, 28â38. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Zhang, X.; Qu, M. Impact of Environmental Regulation on Scientific and Technological Competitiveness of Resource-Based Cities in China-Based on Panel Data of 33 Resource-Based Cities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9187. [CrossRef]