Abadie, A., Imbens, G.W., 2008. On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Econometrica 76(6), 1537-1557.
- Aerts, K., Czarnitzki D., 2006. âThe Impact of Public R&DâFunding in Flanders. â Brussels, Belgium: IWT Study No. 54.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Aerts, K., Czarnitzki, D., 2004.âUsing Innovation Survey Data to Evaluate R&D Policy: The Case of Belgium.â ZEW Discussion Paper No. 04-55, Mannheim.
Aerts, K., Schmidt, T., 2008. Two for the Price of One? On Additionality Eïects of R&D Subsidies: A Comparison between Flanders and Germany. Research Policy 37(5), 806-822.
Almus, M., Czarnitzki, D., 2003. The Eïects of Public R&D Subsidies on Firmsâ Innovation Activities: The Case of Eastern Germany. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 21(2), 226â236.
Arrow, K., 1962. âEconomic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity.â Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
- Bernard, A., Jensen, B., 1999. Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Eïect, or Both?. Journal of International Economics 47, 1-25.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bia, M, Mattei, A., 2008. A STATA Package for the Estimation of the DoseResponse Function through Adjustment for the Generalized Propensity Score, The Stata Journal 8(3), 354-373.
- Bloch, C., Graversen, E.K., 2008. âAdditionality of public R&D funding in business R&D.â Working Paper 2008/5, The Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Buisseret, T.J., Cameron, H., Georghiou, L., 1995. What diïerence does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large ïrms. International Journal of Technology Management, 10, 587-600
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Busom, I., 2000. An empirical evaluation of the eïects of R&D subsidies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 9 (2), 111â148.
- Capron, H., 1992. âEconomic Quantitative Methods for the Evaluation of the Impact of R&D Programmes.â A State of the Art, Monitor-Spear Series, European Community Commission, Brussels.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Czarnitzki, D., Fier, A., 2001. âDo R&D Subsidies Matter? Evidence for the German Service Sector.â ZEW Discussion Paper No. 01-19, Mannheim.
David, P.A., Hall B.H., Toole, A.A., 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29(4), 497â529.
Diamond, A.M., 1999.Does Funderal Funding âCrowd Inâ private funding of science?. Comtemporary Economic Policy 17(4), 423-431.
Duguet, E., 2004. Are R&D Subsidies a Substitute or a Complement to Privately Funded R&D? An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level. Revue dâEconomie Politique, 114(2), 245-274.
- GarcÄa-Quevedo, J., 2004. Do public subsidies complement business R&D?: a Meta-Analysis of the Econometric Evidence. Kyklos 57, 87â102.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gonzalez, X., Jaumandreu, J., Pazo C., 2005. Barriers to innovation and subsidy eïectiveness. The Rand Journal of Economics 36 (4), 930â950.
- Gonzalez, X., Pazo, C., 2008. Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?. Research Policy 37(3), 371â389.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gorg, H., Strobl, E., 2007. Money for Nothing? Do R&D Subsidies Add to or Crowd Out Private R&D?. Economica 74(294), 215-243.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., Todd, P., 1998. Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data. Econometrica 66(5), 1017-1098.
- Heijs, J., Herrera, L., 2004. âThe distribution of R&D subsidies and its eïect on the ïnal outcome of innovation policy.â Working paper Instituto de Analisis Industrial y Financiero 46, Madrid.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hirano, K., Imbens, G., 2004. âThe propensity score with continuous treatments. â Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from IncompleteData Perspectives, 73-84 (A. Gelman & X.L. Meng, Eds.). New York: Wiley.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hussinger, K., 2008. R&D and Subsidies at the Firm Level: An Application of Parametric and Semi-Parametric Two-Step Selection Models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 23(6), 729-747.
- Imbens, G. W., 2000. The role of the propensity score in estimating doseresponse functions. Biometrika 83, 706-710.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Imbens, G.W., Wooldridge, J.M., 2009. Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature 47(1), 5-86.
- Kaiser, U., 2006. Private R&D and public subsidies: microeconomic evidence from Denmark. Danish Journal of Economics 144 (1), 1â17.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lach, S., 2002. Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. Journal of Industrial Economics 50(4), 369â390.
- Lechner, M., 2001. âIdentiïcation and estimation of causal eïects of multiple treatments under the conditional independence assumptionâ, in M. Lechner and F. Pfeiïer (eds., 2001), Econometric Evaluation of Active Labour Market Policies, Heidelberg: Physica, 43-58.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lechner, M., 2004. âSequential Matching Estimation of Dynamic Causal Models. â University of St. Gallen, Discussion paper.
Loof, H., Heshmati, A., 2005. âThe impact of public funds on private R&D investment: New evidence from a ïrm-level innovation study.â In: A. Heshmati, Y. B. Sohn & Y. R. Kim (Eds), Commercialisation and Transfer of Technology: Major Country Case Studies (Nova Science Publishers).
Melitz, M.J., 2003. The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica 71, 1695-1725.
- Nelson, R.R., 1959. The simple economics of basic scientiïc research, The Journal of Political Economy 67, 297-306.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nelson, R.R., 1984. âHigh-Technology Policies: A Five-Nation Comparison.â Washington/London: American Enterprise Institute.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- OECD, 2005. Economic Survey of Denmark. Paris.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- OECD, 2009. âPolicy responses to the Economic crisis. Investing in Innovation for Long-Term Growth.â Paris.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B., 1983. Assessing Sensitivity to an Unobserved Binary Covariate in an Observational Study With Binary Outcome. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 45(2), 212-218.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
SÃrensen, A., Kongsted, H.C., Marcusson, M., 2003. R&D, public innovation policy and productivity. The case of Danish manufacturing. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12(2), 163-178.
- Suetens, S., 2002. âR&D subsidies and production eïects of R&D personnel: evidence from the Flemish region.â CESIT Discussion Paper 2002/03, Antwerp.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wagner, J., 2008. Understanding Cross-Country Diïerences in Exporter Premia: Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries. Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer, Vol. 144, No.4, 596-635.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now