create a website

Facing transition phase two: Analysing actor strategies in a stagnating acceleration phase. (2020). Lohr, Meike ; Mattes, Jannika.
In: Papers in Innovation Studies.
RePEc:hhs:lucirc:2020_012.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 46

References cited by this document

Cocites: 26

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The role of material resources for rapid technology diffusion in net-zero transitions: Insights from EV lithium-ion battery Technological Innovation System in China. (2024). Gong, Huiwen ; Andersen, Allan Dahl.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523008260.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. What about the regional level? Regional configurations of Technological Innovation Systems. (2021). Rohe, Sebastian ; Mattes, Jannika.
    In: PEGIS.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwpeg:geo-disc-2021_01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Agora Energiewende. 2020. Die Energiewende im Stromsektor: Stand der Dinge 2019: Rückblick auf die wesentlichen Entwicklungen sowie Ausblick auf 2020. Agora Energiewende. www.agora-energiewende.de.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Andersen, Allan D., and Jochen Markard. 2020. “Multi-technology interaction in socio-technical transitions: How recent dynamics in HVDC technology can inform transition theories.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change (151).

  3. Andersen, Allan D., and Magnus Gulbrandsen. 2020. “The innovation and industry dynamics of technology phase-out in sustainability transitions: Insights from diversifying petroleum technology suppliers in Norway.” Energy Research & Social Science 64: 101447.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Aykut, Stefan C., Mario Neukirch, Cathrin Zengerling, Anita Engels, Mirko Suhari, and Angela Pohlmann. 2019. “Energiewende ohne gesellschaftlichen Wandel? Der blinde Fleck in der aktuellen Debatte zur „Sektorkopplung“.” Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen 69 (3): 20-24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bathelt, Harald, Anders Malmberg, and Peter Maskell. 2004. “Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation.” Progress in Human Geography 28 (1): 31–56.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Bolton, Ronan, and Matthew Hannon. 2016. “Governing sustainability transitions through business model innovation: Towards a systems understanding.” Research Policy 45 (9): 1731–42.

  7. Bryant, Scott T., Karla Straker, and Cara Wrigley. 2018. “The typologies of power: Energy utility business models in an increasingly renewable sector.” Journal of Cleaner Production 195: 1032–46.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Chlebna, Camilla, and Jannika Mattes. 2020. “The fragility of regional energy transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 37: 66–78.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Deutsche WindGuard. 2019. Status des Windenergieausbaus an Land in Deutschland: Jahr 2019. https://www.windguard.de/jahr2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Engau, Christian, and Volker H. Hoffmann. 2011. “Corporate response strategies to regulatory uncertainty: evidence from uncertainty about post-Kyoto regulation.” Policy Sciences 44 (1): 53–80.

  11. European Commission. 2014. Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent /EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52014XC0628%2801%29.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Farla, Jacco, Jochen Markard, Rob Raven, and Lars Coenen. 2012. “Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (6): 991–98.

  13. Frei, Fanny, Simon R. Sinsel, Ahmed Hanafy, and Joern Hoppmann. 2018. “Leaders or laggards? The evolution of electric utilities’ business portfolios during the energy transition.” Energy Policy 120: 655–65.

  14. Hall, Stephen, and Katy Roelich. 2016. “Business model innovation in electricity supply markets: The role of complex value in the United Kingdom.” Energy Policy 92: 286–98.

  15. Heidenreich, Martin, Jürgen Kädtler, and Jannika Mattes, eds. 2017. Kollaborative Innovationen: Die innerbetriebliche Nutzung externer Wissensbestände in vernetzten Entwicklungsprozessen. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Hess, David J. 2014. “Sustainability transitions: A political coalition perspective.” Research Policy 43 (2): 278–83.

  17. Huenteler, Joern, Tobias S. Schmidt, Jan Ossenbrink, and Volker H. Hoffmann. 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Innovation and Societal Transitions 34: 121–38. Wainstein, Martin E., and Adam G. Bumpus. 2016. “Business models as drivers of the low carbon power system transition: a multi-level perspective.” Journal of Cleaner Production 126: 572–85.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Jacobsson, Staffan, and Volkmar Lauber. 2006. “The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology.” Energy Policy 34 (3): 256–76.

  20. Klepper, Steven. 1997. “Industry life cycles.” Industrial and Corporate Change 6 (1): 145–82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Konrad, Kornelia, Jochen Markard, Annette Ruef, and Bernhard Truffer. 2012. “Strategic responses to fuel cell hype and disappointment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (6): 1084–98.

  22. Kuckartz, Udo. 2016. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung [ger]. 3rd ed. Grundlagentexte Methoden. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Juventa.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Kuemmerle, Walter. 1997. “Building effective R&D capabilities abroad.” Harvard Business Review 75 (2): 61-70.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Kungl, Gregor. 2015. “Stewards or sticklers for change? Incumbent energy providers and the politics of the German energy transition.” Energy Research & Social Science 8: 13–23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Leipprand, Anna, and Christian Flachsland. 2018. “Regime destabilization in energy transitions: The German debate on the future of coal.” Energy Research & Social Science 40: 190–204.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Löhr, Meike. 2020. Energietransitionen: Eine Analyse der Phasen und Akteurskoalitionen in Dänemark, Deutschland und Frankreich. 1st ed. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Malmberg, Anders, and Peter Maskell. 2006. “Localized learning revisited.” Growth and Change 37 (1): 1–18.

  28. Markard, Jochen. 2018. “The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy.” Nature Energy 3 (8): 628–33.

  29. Mayring, Philipp. 2010. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz Verlagsgruppe.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Müller, Ralf, Martin Steinert, and Stephanie Teufel. 2008. “Successful diversification strategies of electricity companies: An explorative empirical study on the success of different diversification strategies of German electricity companies in the wake of the European market liberalization.” Energy Policy 36 (1): 398–412.

  31. Nillesen, Paul, and Michael Pollitt. 2016. “New business models for utilities to meet the challenge of the energy transition.” In Future of utilities - utilities of the future: How technological innovations in distributed energy resources will reshape the electric power sector, ed. Fereidoon P. Sioshansi. Amsterdam, Boston: Academic Press/Elsevier, 283– 301.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. O’Sullivan, Marlene. 2020. “Industrial life cycle: relevance of national markets in the development of new industries for energy technologies – the case of wind energy.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 3 (6): 639.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Ratinen, Mari, and Peter D. Lund. 2014. “Growth strategies of incumbent utilities as contextually embedded: Examples from Denmark, Germany, Finland and Spain.” Technology in Society 38: 81–92.

  34. REN21. 2020. Renewables 2020 Global Status Report. Paris. https://www.ren21.net/wpcontent /uploads/2019/05/gsr_2020_full_report_en.pdf (October 27, 2020).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Roberts, Cameron, and Frank W. Geels. 2019. “Conditions for politically accelerated transitions: Historical institutionalism, the multi-level perspective, and two historical case studies in transport and agriculture.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 140: 221–40.

  36. Roberts, Cameron, Frank W. Geels, Matthew Lockwood, Peter Newell, Hubert Schmitz, Bruno Turnheim, and Andy Jordan. 2018. “The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: Towards a new research agenda.” Energy Research & Social Science 44: 304–11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Rogge, Karoline S., and Phil Johnstone. 2017. “Exploring the role of phase-out policies for lowcarbon energy transitions: The case of the German Energiewende.” Energy Research & Social Science 33: 128–37.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Rotmans, Jan, René Kemp, and Marjolein van Asselt. 2001. “More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy.” Foresight 3 (1): 15–31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Schmid, Eva, Brigitte Knopf, and Anna Pechan. 2016. “Putting an energy system transformation into practice: The case of the German Energiewende.” Energy Research & Social Science 11: 263–75.

  40. Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2016. “How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions.” Energy Research & Social Science 13: 202–15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Steen, Markus, and Tyson Weaver. 2017. “Incumbents’ diversification and cross-sectorial energy industry dynamics.” Research Policy 46 (6): 1071–86.

  42. Stenzel, Till, and Alexander Frenzel. 2008. “Regulating technological change - The strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets.” Energy Policy 36 (7): 2645–57.

  43. Storper, Michael. 1995. “The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later.” European Urban and Regional Studies 2 (3): 191–221.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Turnheim, Bruno, and Benjamin K. Sovacool. 2020. “Forever stuck in old ways? Pluralising incumbencies in sustainability transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35: 180–84.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. WBGU. 2011. Welt im Wandel: Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine große Transformation. Berlin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Whittington, Richard. 2010. What is strategy - and does it matter? 10th ed. Australia: SouthWestern Cengage Learning.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Explaining the emergence and absence of Seasonal Thermal Energy Storage in the UK: Evidence from local case studies. (2025). Bolton, Ronan ; Winskel, Mark ; Cameron, Lewis.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pb:s0306261924017057.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Integrating industrial transformation and sustainability transitions research through a multi-sectoral perspective. (2024). Makitie, Tuukka ; Steen, Markus ; Wanzenbock, Iris ; Andersen, Allan Dahl.
    In: Working Papers on Innovation Studies.
    RePEc:tik:inowpp:20240206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Future ecosystem business model tool: Design science and field test in the efuel ecosystem towards the sustainability transition. (2024). Battistella, Cinzia ; Culot, Giovanna.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:208:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524004803.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The role of material resources for rapid technology diffusion in net-zero transitions: Insights from EV lithium-ion battery Technological Innovation System in China. (2024). Gong, Huiwen ; Andersen, Allan Dahl.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523008260.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Scaling sustainable technologies by creating innovation demand-pull: Strategic actions by food producers. (2024). Bor, Sanne ; Hakala, Henri ; O'Shea, Gregory.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:198:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523006261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Technological change and the evolution of the links across sectoral systems: The case of mobile communications. (2024). Malerba, Franco ; Li, Daitian.
    In: Technovation.
    RePEc:eee:techno:v:130:y:2024:i:c:s016649722300247x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Governance in multi-system transitions: A new methodological approach for actor involvement in policy making processes. (2024). Lovell, Katherine ; Rogge, Karoline S ; Ate, Asli.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:195:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524003331.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?. (2023). Schartinger, Doris ; Havas, Attila ; Weber, Matthias K.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:120070.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The transition of brown regions: A matter of timing?. (2023). Basilico, Stefano ; Grashof, Nils.
    In: Jena Economics Research Papers.
    RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2023-003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: Sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world. (2023). Menefee, Maia ; Kim, Jinsoo ; McLaughlin, Hope ; Sovacool, Benjamin K ; Kinzer, Austin ; Littlefield, Anna A ; Hull, Tobias ; Griffiths, Steven ; Bazilian, Morgan D.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:177:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123000710.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Socio-technical barriers to domestic hydrogen futures: Repurposing pipelines, policies, and public perceptions. (2023). Nabavi, Seyed Ali ; Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye ; Gordon, Joel A.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:336:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923002143.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The role of natural resources in accelerating net-zero transitions: Insights from EV lithium-ion battery Technological Innovation System in China. (2022). Gong, Huiwen ; Andersen, Allan Dahl.
    In: Working Papers on Innovation Studies.
    RePEc:tik:inowpp:20221001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Managing Structural Tensions in the Transition to the Circular Economy: the Case of Electric Vehicle Batteries. (2022). Trucco, Paolo ; Nuur, Cali ; Chizaryfard, Armaghan.
    In: Circular Economy and Sustainability.
    RePEc:spr:circec:v:2:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s43615-022-00152-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The evolving role of networking organizations in advanced sustainability transitions. (2022). Rohe, Sebastian ; Chlebna, Camilla.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:183:y:2022:i:c:s0040162522004383.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Facing transition phase two: Analysing actor strategies in a stagnating acceleration phase. (2022). Lohr, Meike ; Mattes, Jannika.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:174:y:2022:i:c:s0040162521006545.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Complementarity formation mechanisms in technology value chains. (2022). Hansen, Teis ; Makitie, Tuukka ; Steen, Markus ; Hanson, Jens ; Andersen, Allan Dahl.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:51:y:2022:i:7:s004873332200083x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. High voltage direct current systems through submarine cables for offshore wind farms: A life-cycle cost analysis with voltage source converters for bulk power transmission. (2022). Acarolu, Hakan ; Garcia, Fausto Pedro.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:249:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222006168.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Dimensions of systems and transformations: Towards an integrated framework for system transformations. (2021). Schiller, Katharina ; Kohler, Jonathan Hugh ; Edler, Jakob ; Salas-Girones, Edgar ; Braun, Annette ; Wydra, Sven.
    In: Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation.
    RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s032021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The transformation to a circular economy: framing an evolutionary view. (2021). Trucco, Paolo ; Nuur, Cali ; Chizaryfard, Armaghan.
    In: Journal of Evolutionary Economics.
    RePEc:spr:joevec:v:31:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s00191-020-00709-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The co-evolution of innovation systems and context: Offshore wind in Norway and the Netherlands. (2021). Hekkert, Marko P ; Hanson, Jens ; Normann, Hkon E ; van der Loos, Adriaan.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:138:y:2021:i:c:s1364032120307991.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. A spatial perspective on the legitimacy of a technological innovation system: Regional differences in onshore wind energy. (2021). Rohe, Sebastian ; Chlebna, Camilla.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:151:y:2021:i:c:s0301421521000628.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Grasping transformative regional development from a co-evolutionary perspective – a research agenda. (2021). Mattes, Jannika ; Martin, Hanna ; Chlebna, Camilla.
    In: GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions.
    RePEc:aoe:wpaper:2105.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The evolving role of networking organizations in advanced sustainability transitions. (2021). Rohe, Sebastian ; Chlebna, Camilla.
    In: GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions.
    RePEc:aoe:wpaper:2104.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Facing transition phase two: Analysing actor strategies in a stagnating acceleration phase. (2020). Lohr, Meike ; Mattes, Jannika.
    In: Papers in Innovation Studies.
    RePEc:hhs:lucirc:2020_012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The UK and German Low-Carbon Industry Transitions from a Sectoral Innovation and System Failures Perspective. (2020). Koasidis, Konstantinos ; Wachsmuth, Jakob ; Neofytou, Hera ; Doukas, Haris ; Karamaneas, Anastasios ; Nikas, Alexandros ; Gambhir, Ajay.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:4994-:d:417777.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. How deployment policies affect innovation in complementary technologies—evidence from the German energy transition. (2020). Hoffmann, Volker H ; Sinsel, Simon R ; Markard, Jochen.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:161:y:2020:i:c:s0040162520311008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 17:54:47 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.