create a website

Public Funding and Corporate Innovation. (2017). Kaiser, Ulrich ; Beck, Mathias ; Junge, Martin.
In: IZA Discussion Papers.
RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11196.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 7

Citations received by this document

Cites: 184

References cited by this document

Cocites: 52

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The Role of Public Incentives in Promoting Innovation: An Analysis of Recurrently Supported Companies. (2024). Varum, Celeste ; Rosario, Catia ; Botelho, Anabela.
    In: Economies.
    RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:6:p:148-:d:1413540.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The private return of R&D tax credit. (2021). Courtioux, Pierre ; Metivier, Franois ; Reberioux, Antoine.
    In: Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    RePEc:mse:cesdoc:21006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The Effects of R&D Subsidies and Publicly Performed R&D on Business R&D: A Survey. (2021). Ziesemer, Thomas.
    In: Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics.
    RePEc:hpe:journl:y:2021:v:236:i:1:p:171-205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The private return of R&D tax credit. (2021). Courtioux, Pierre ; Metivier, Franois ; Reberioux, Antoine.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03182771.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The private return of R&D tax credit. (2021). Courtioux, Pierre ; Reberioux, Antoine ; Metivier, Franois.
    In: Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers).
    RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-03182771.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The effects of R&D subsidies and publicly performed R&D on business R&D: A survey. (2019). Ziesemer, Thomas.
    In: MERIT Working Papers.
    RePEc:unm:unumer:2019036.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Innovation in newly public firms: The influence of government grants, venture capital, and private equity. (2019). Suchard, Jo-Ann ; Shinkle, George A.
    In: Australian Journal of Management.
    RePEc:sae:ausman:v:44:y:2019:i:2:p:248-281.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Østergaard, C. R. 2007. Knowledge flows through social networks in a cluster: interfirm versus university-industry Contacts. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.

  2. Abramovsky, L. and Simpson, H. 2011. Geographic proximity and firm–university innovation linkages: evidence from Great Britain. Journal of economic geography, 11(6): 949-977.

  3. Adams, J. D. 1990. Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(4): 673-702.

  4. Aerts, K. and Schmidt, T. 2008. Two for the price of one? Research Policy, 37(5): 806-822.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Arora, A. and Cohen, W. M. 2015. Public support for technical advance: the role of firm size. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(4): 791-802.

  6. Arrow, K. J. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: 609-626: Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.

  7. Arundel, A. and Geuna, A. 2004. Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and new Technology, 13(6): 559580.

  8. Arundel, A., Van de Paal, G., and Soete, L. 1995. Innovation strategies of Europe’s largest firms: Results of the PACE survey for information sources, public research, protection of innovations and government programmes, Final Report, MERIT, University of Limburg, Maastricht.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Arvanitis, S. 2013. Micro-econometric approaches to the evaluation of technologyoriented public programmes: a non-technical review of the state of the art. Handbook on the Theory and Practice of Program Evaluation: 56-88.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Arvanitis, S. and Woerter, M. 2015. Exploration or exploitation of knowledge from universities: does it make a difference? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24(6): 596-623.

  11. Arvanitis, S., Donze, L., and Sydow, N. 2010. Impact of Swiss technology policy on firm innovation performance: an evaluation based on a matching approach. Science and Public Policy, 37(1): 63-78.

  12. Arvanitis, S., Sydow, N., and Woerter, M. 2008a. Do specific forms of universityindustry knowledge transfer have different impacts on the performance of private enterprises? An empirical analysis based on Swiss firm data. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(5): 504-533.

  13. Arvanitis, S., Sydow, N., and Woerter, M. 2008b. Is there any impact of university– industry knowledge transfer on innovation and productivity? An empirical analysis based on Swiss firm data. Review of Industrial Organization, 32(2): 77-94.

  14. Aschhoff, B. 2009. The effect of subsidies on R&D investment and success–Do subsidy history and size matter? ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper(09-032).

  15. Bacchiocchi, E. and Montobbio, F. 2010. International Knowledge Diffusion and Home‐ bias Effect: Do USPTO and EPO Patent Citations Tell the Same Story? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 112(3): 441-470.

  16. Baghana, R. and Mohnen, P. 2009. Effectiveness of R&D tax incentives in small and large enterprises in Qu,bec. Small Business Economics, 33(1): 91-107.

  17. Bania, N., Eberts, R. W., and Fogarty, M. S. 1993. Universities and the startup of new companies: can we generalize from route 128 and Silicon valley? The review of economics and statistics: 761-766.

  18. Baptista, R. and Mendonça, J. 2010. Proximity to knowledge sources and the location of knowledge-based start-ups. The Annals of Regional Science, 45(1): 5-29.

  19. Barge-Gil, A. and Lopez, A. 2015. R versus D: estimating the differentiated effect of research and development on innovation results. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(1): 93-129.

  20. Beck, M. and Lopes Bento, C. 2016. Innovation Outcomes and Partner-Type Selection in R&D Alliances: The Role of Simultaneous Diversification and Sequential Adaptation. Available at SSRN 2823572, UZH Business Working Paper Series.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Beck, M. and Schenker–Wicki, A. 2014. Cooperating with external partners: the importance of diversity for innovation performance. European Journal of International Management, 8(5): 548-569.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Beck, M., Lopes-Bento, C., and Schenker-Wicki, A. 2016. Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit? Research Policy, 45(4): 869-883.

  23. Becker, B. 2015. Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(5): 917-942.

  24. Beise, M. and Stahl, H. 1999. Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Research Policy, 28(4): 397-422.

  25. Belenzon, S. and Schankerman, M. 2013. Spreading the Word: Geography, Policy, and Knowledge Spillovers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3): 884-903.

  26. Berstein, J. I. and Mamuneas, T. P. 2005. Depreciation estimation, R&D capital stock, and North American manufacturing productivity growth. Annales d'Économie et de Statistique: 383-404.

  27. Bishop, K., D'Este, P., and Neely, A. 2011. Gaining from interactions with universities: Multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 40(1): 3040.

  28. Bloch, C. and Graversen, E. K. 2008. Additionality of public R&D funding in business R&D. Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, University of Aarhus.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Bloom, N., Griffith, R. and van Reenen, J. (2002). Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979-1997. Journal of Public Economics, 85: 1-31.

  30. Branstetter, L. G. and Sakakibara, M. 2002. When Do Research Consortia Work Well and Why? Evidence from Japanese Panel Data. The American Economic Review, 92(1): 143-159.

  31. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1987(3): 783-831.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Busom, I. and Fernandez-Ribas, A. 2008. The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships. Research Policy, 37(2): 240-257.

  33. Caballero, R. J. and Jaffe, A. B. 1993. How high are the giants' shoulders: An empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. NBER macroeconomics annual, 8: 15-74.

  34. Callon, M. 1994. Is science a public good? fifth mullins lecture, virginia polytechnic institute, 23 march 1993. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 19(4): 395-424.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Cappelen, A., Raknerud, A., and Rybalka, M. 2012. The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations. Research Policy, 41(2): 334-345.

  36. Carboni, M. and Regazzi, D. 2011. Effect of the experimental technique onto R dependence of Delta Kth. 11th International Conference on the Mechanical Behavior of Materials (Icm11), 10(4): 419-439.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. 2002. R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92(4): 11691184.

  38. Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., and Zuniga, P. 2008. In search of performance effects of (in)direct industry science links. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(4): 611646.

  39. Castellacci, F. and Lie, C. M. 2015. Do the effects of R&D tax credits vary across industries? A meta-regression analysis. Research Policy, 44(4): 819-832.

  40. Cerulli, G. and Poti, B. 2012. Evaluating the Robustness of the Effect of Public Subsidies on Firms' R&D: An Application to Italy. Journal of Applied Economics, 15(2): 287-320.

  41. Christensen, T., Kuhn, J., Schneider, C., and Sørensen, A. 2015. Science and Productivity–Evidence from a randomized natural experiment, SIMPATIC final conference, Brussels, February.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Clausen, T. H. 2009. Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 20(4): 239-253.

  43. Cockburn, I. M. and Henderson, R. M. 1998. Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2): 157-182.

  44. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. 1989. Innovation and Learning - the 2 Faces of Rand -D. Economic Journal, 99(397): 569-596.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive-Capacity - a New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., and Walsh, J. P. 2002. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management science, 48(1): 1-23.

  47. Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., and Rentocchini, F. 2012. The effects of incubation on academic and non-academic high-tech start-ups: evidence from Italy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(5-6): 505-527.

  48. Comin, D. 2000. An uncertainty-driven theory of the productivity slowdown: Manufacturing.

  49. Comin, D. and Hobijn, B. 2007. Implementing technology: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  50. Cowan, R. and Zinovyeva, N. 2013. University effects on regional innovation. Research Policy, 42(3): 788-800.

  51. Czarnitzki, D. and Delanote, J. 2015. R&D policies for young SMEs: input and output effects. Small Business Economics, 45(3): 465-485.

  52. Czarnitzki, D. and Hussinger, K. 2004. The link between R&D subsidies, R&D spending and technological performance: ZEW Discussion Papers.

  53. Czarnitzki, D. and Licht, G. 2006. Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy. Economics of Transition, 14(1): 101-131.

  54. Czarnitzki, D. and Lopes-Bento, C. 2012. Evaluation of public R&D policies: a cross– country comparison. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 9(2-4): 254-282.

  55. Czarnitzki, D. and Lopes-Bento, C. 2014. Innovation subsidies: Does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany. Industry and Innovation, 21(5): 380-409.

  56. Czarnitzki, D. and Thorwarth, S. 2012. Productivity effects of basic research in low-tech and high-tech industries. Research Policy, 41(9): 1555-1564.

  57. Czarnitzki, D., Hanel, P., and Rosa, J. M. 2011. Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy, 40(2): 217-229.

  58. Czarnitzki, D., Huergo, E., Köhler, M., Mohnen, P., Pacher, T., T., , and Toivanen, O. 2015. Welfare effects of European R&D support policies. , vol. working paper no. 34.: SIMPATIC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Czarnitzki, D., Hussinger, K., and Schneider, C. 2011. Commercializing academic research: the quality of faculty patenting. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(5): 1403-1437.

  60. Czarnitzki, D., Kraft, K., and Thorwarth, S. 2009. The knowledge production of 'R' and 'D'. Economics Letters, 105(1): 141-143.

  61. D'Aspremont, C. and Jacquemin, A. 1988. Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers. American Economic Review, 78(5): 1133-1137.

  62. Díez-Vial, I. and Fernández-Olmos, M. 2015. Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: how can firms benefit most? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1): 70-84.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. D’este, P. and Perkmann, M. 2011. Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3): 316-339.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Dasgupta, P. and David, P. A. 1994. Toward a New Economics of Science. Research Policy, 23(5): 487-521.

  65. David, P. A., Hall, B. H., and Toole, A. A. 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5): 497-529.

  66. Debackere, K. and Veugelers, R. 2005. The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research policy, 34(3): 321342.

  67. DeBondt, R. 1997. Spillovers and innovative activities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(1): 1-28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Di Gregorio, D. and Shane, S. 2003. Why do some universities generate more startups than others? Research policy, 32(2): 209-227.

  69. Dimos, C. and Pugh, G. 2016. The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Research Policy, 45(4): 797-815.

  70. Dorfman, N. S. 1983. Route-128 - the Development of a Regional High Technology Economy. Research Policy, 12(6): 299-316.

  71. Duguet, E. 2004. Are R&D subsidies a substitute or a complement to privately funded R&D? Evidence from France using propensity score methods for nonexperimental data. Revue d'économie politique, 114(2): 245-274.

  72. Ejsing, A.-K., Kaiser, U., Kongsted, H. C., and Laursen, K. 2013. The Role of University Scientist Mobility for Industrial Innovation. University of Zurich, Institute of Business Administration, UZH Business Working Paper(332).

  73. Elschner, C., Ernst, C., Licht, G., and Spengel, C. 2011. What the design of an R&D tax incentive tells about its effectiveness: a simulation of R&D tax incentives in the European Union. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3): 233-256.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Fahrenkrog, G. 2002. RTD evaluation toolbox: assessing the socio-economic impact of RTD-policies: European Commission, Joint Research Centre.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Falck, O., Heblich, S., and Kipar, S. 2010. Industrial innovation: Direct evidence from a cluster-oriented policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(6): 574582.

  76. Falk, M. 2006. What drives business Research and Development (R&D) intensity across Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries? Applied Economics, 38(5): 533-547.

  77. Faulkner, W. and Senker, J. 1994. Making sense of diversity: public-private sector research linkage in three technologies. Research Policy, 23(6): 673-695.

  78. Faulkner, W., Senker, J., and Velho, L. 1995. Knowledge frontiers: Clarendon Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., and Sobrero, M. 2011. Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40(8): 1113-1127.

  80. Foray, D. and Lissoni, F. 2010. University research and public–private interaction. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1: 275-314.

  81. Fosse, H. B., Jacobsen, J., and Jacobsen, R. H. 2014. The Short-run Impact on Total Factor Productivity Growth: Of the Danish Innovation and Research Support System.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Fritsch, M. and Aamoucke, R. 2013. Regional public research, higher education, and innovative start-ups: An empirical investigation. Small Business Economics, 41(4): 865-885.

  83. Frontier Economics. 2014. Rates of return to investment in science and innovation. A report prepared for the UK Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Görg, H. and Strobl, E. 2007. The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D. Economica, 74(294): 215-234.

  85. Gibbons, M. and Johnston, R. 1974. The roles of science in technological innovation. Research Policy, 3(3): 220-242.

  86. Gittelman, M. and Kogut, B. 2003. Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science, 49(4): 366-382.

  87. González, X. and Pazó, C. 2008. Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? Research Policy, 37(3): 371-389.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Griliches, Z. 1979. Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1): 92-116.

  89. Griliches, Z., Hall, B. H., and Pakes, A. 1991. R&D, patents, and market value revisited: Is there a second (technological opportunity) factor? Economics of Innovation and new technology, 1(3): 183-201.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Guellec, D. and Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, B. 2003. The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D*. Economics of innovation and new technology, 12(3): 225-243.

  91. Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., and Urbano, D. 2015. Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3): 748-764.

  92. Hall, B. and Van Reenen, J. 2000. How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5): 449-469.

  93. Hall, B. H. 2004. University-industry research partnerships in the United States: European University Institute Badia Fiesolana,, San Domenico, Italy.

  94. Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., and Scott, J. T. 2003. Universities as research partners. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2): 485-491.

  95. Hall, B. H., Lotti, F., and Mairesse, J. 2009. Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, 33(1): 13-33.

  96. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., and Trajtenberg, M. 1998. Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1): 119-127.

  97. Hottenrott, H. and Lopes-Bento, C. 2014. (International) R&D collaboration and SMEs: The effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes. Research Policy, 43(6): 1055-1066.

  98. Hottenrott, H., Lopes Bento, C., and Veugelers, R. 2015. Direct and cross-scheme effects in a research and development subsidy program. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper(14-107).

  99. Howells, J., Ramlogan, R., and Cheng, S. L. 2012. Innovation and university collaboration: paradox and complexity within the knowledge economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(3): 703-721.

  100. Hussinger, K. 2008. R&D and Subsidies at the Firm Level: An Application of Parametric and Semiparametric Two-Step Selection Models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(6): 729-747.

  101. Jaffe, A. B. 1988. Demand and Supply Influences in R-and-D Intensity and Productivity Growth. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3): 431-437.

  102. Jaffe, A. B. 1989. Real Effects of Academic Research. American Economic Review, 79(5): 957-970.

  103. Jaffe, A. B. and Trajtenberg, M. 2002. Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy: MIT press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  104. Jaumotte, F. and Pain, N. 2005. An overview of public policies to support innovation.

  105. Jones, C. I. and Williams, J. C. 1998. Measuring the social return to R and D.

  106. Junge, M., Severgnini, B., and Sørensen, A. 2016. Product‐Marketing Innovation, Skills, and Firm Productivity Growth. Review of Income and Wealth, 62(4): 724-757.

  107. Kaiser, U. 2002. An empirical test of models explaining research expenditures and research cooperation: evidence for the German service sector. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(6): 747-774.

  108. Kaiser, U. 2006. Private R&D and Public R&D subsidies: Microeconometric Evidence for Denmark. Nationaløkonomisk Tidsskrift, 144: 1-17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  109. Kaiser, U. and Kuhn, J. M. 2012. Long-run effects of public-private research joint ventures: The case of the Danish Innovation Consortia support scheme. Research Policy, 41(5): 913-927.

  110. Kaiser, U., Kongsted, H. C., and Rønde, T. 2015. Does the mobility of R&D labor increase innovation? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 110: 91-105.

  111. Katz, M. L. 1986. An Analysis of Cooperative Research-and-Development. Rand Journal of Economics, 17(4): 527-543.

  112. Klette, T. J. and Møen, J. 2012. R&D investment responses to R&D subsidies: A theoretical analysis and a microeconometric study. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 9(2-4): 169-203.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  113. Klette, T. J., Moen, J., and Griliches, Z. 2000. Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies. Research Policy, 29(45) : 471-495.

  114. Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. 1995. On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities. Research Policy, 24(2): 185-205.

  115. Lach, S. 2002. Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(4): 369-390.

  116. Laursen, K., Reichstein, T., and Salter, A. 2011. Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Regional studies, 45(4): 507-523.

  117. Leten, B., Landoni, P., and Van Looy, B. 2014. Science or graduates: How do firms benefit from the proximity of universities? Research Policy, 43(8): 1398-1412.

  118. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., and Griliches, Z. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development.

  119. List, J. A. and Rasul, I. 2011. Field Experiments in Labor Economics. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol 4a, 4: 103-228.

  120. Lokshin, B. and Mohnen, P. 2012. How effective are level-based R&D tax credits? Evidence from the Netherlands. Applied Economics, 44(12): 1527-1538.

  121. Maietta, O. W. 2015. Determinants of university-firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry. Research Policy, 44(7): 1341-1359.

  122. Maine, E. M., Shapiro, D. M., and Vining, A. R. 2010. The role of clustering in the growth of new technology-based firms. Small Business Economics, 34(2): 127-146.

  123. Mansfield, E. 1991. Social returns from R&D: findings, methods and limitations. Research Technology Management, 34(6): 24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  124. Mansfield, E. 1995. Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations - Sources, Characteristics and Financing. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1): 55-62.

  125. Martin, B. and Irvine, J. 1981. Spin-off from basic science: the case of radioastronomy. Physics in Technology, 12(5): 204.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  126. Martin, B. R., Hicks, D., and Salter, A. 1996. The relationship between publicly funded basic research and economic performance: A SPRU review: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  127. Martin, S. and Scott, J. T. 2000. The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation. Research Policy, 29(4-5): 437-447.

  128. McMillan, G. S., Narin, F., and Deeds, D. L. 2000. An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology. Research Policy, 29(1): 1-8.

  129. Meyer-Krahmer, F. and Schmoch, U.. 1998. Science-based technologies: universityindustry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8): 835-851.

  130. Meyer, M. 2000. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research policy, 29(3): 409-434.

  131. Mowery, D. 1995. The practice of technology policy. Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change: 513-557.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  132. Mowery, D. C. and Sampat, B. N. 2004. The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university– industry technology transfer: a model for other OECD governments? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1-2): 115-127.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  133. Mowery, D. C. and Ziedonis, A. A. 2015. Markets versus spillovers in outflows of university research. Research Policy, 44(1): 50-66.

  134. Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., and Ziedonis, A. A. 2001. The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy, 30(1): 99-119.

  135. Mulkay, B. and Mairesse, J. 2013. The R&D tax credit in France: assessment and ex ante evaluation of the 2008 reform. Oxford Economic Papers-New Series, 65(3): 746-766.

  136. Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., and Vallanti, G. 2013. Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities? Research Policy, 42(1): 63-75.

  137. Narin, F. and Olivastro, D. 1992. Status-Report - Linkage between Technology and Science. Research Policy, 21(3): 237-249.

  138. Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., and Olivastro, D. 1997. The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research policy, 26(3): 317-330.

  139. Nelson, R. R. 1959. The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific-Research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(3): 297-306.

  140. Nelson, R. R. 1986. Institutions Supporting Technical Advance in Industry. American Economic Review, 76(2): 186-189.

  141. Nelson, R. R. 2006. Reflections on The simple economics of basic scientific research: Looking back and looking forward. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(6): 903-917.

  142. Nielsen, K. 2015. Human capital and new venture performance: the industry choice and performance of academic entrepreneurs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(3): 453-474.

  143. Nightingale, P. 1997. Knowledge and technical change: computer simulations and the changing innovation process. University of Sussex.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  144. Nishimura, J. and Okamuro, H. 2011. R&D productivity and the organization of cluster policy: An empirical evaluation of the Industrial Cluster Project in Japan. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2): 117-144.

  145. Pavitt, K. 1991. What makes basic research economically useful? Research Policy, 20(2): 109-119.

  146. Pavitt, K. 1998. The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy, 27(8): 793-805.

  147. Perkmann, M. and Walsh, K. 2007. University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4): 259-280.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  148. Perkmann, M., King, Z. , and Pavelin, S. 2011. Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Research Policy, 40: 539-552.

  149. Quaglione, D., Muscio, A., and Vallanti, G. 2015. The two sides of academic research: do basic and applied activities complement each other? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24(7): 660-681.

  150. Quintas, P., Wield, D., and Massey, D. 1992. Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the science park model. Technovation, 12(3): 161-175.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  151. Rappa, M. A. and Debackere, K. 1992. Technological communities and the diffusion of knowledge. R&D Management, 22(3): 209-220.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  152. Robin, S. and Schubert, T. 2013. Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany. Research Policy, 42(1): 149-166.

  153. Roessner, D., Bond, J., Okubo, S., and Planting, M. 2013. The economic impact of licensed commercialized inventions originating in university research. Research Policy, 42(1): 23-34.

  154. Romer, P. M. 1990. Endogenous Technological-Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): S71-S102.

  155. Rosenberg, N. 1990. Why Do Firms Do Basic Research with Their Own Money. Research Policy, 19(2): 165-174.

  156. Rosenberg, N. 1992. Scientific Instrumentation and University-Research. Research Policy, 21(4): 381-390.

  157. Rosenberg, N. and Nelson, R. R. 1994. American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry. Research Policy, 23(3): 323-348.

  158. Rothaermel, F. T. and Hess, A. M. 2007. Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization science, 18(6): 898-921.

  159. Rothaermel, F. T. and Ku, D. N. 2008. Intercluster innovation differentials: the role of research universities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1): 9-22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  160. Sakakibara, M. 2001. The diversity of R&D consortia and firm behavior: Evidence from Japanese data. Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(2): 181-196.

  161. Salter, A. J. and Martin, B. R. 2001. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30(3): 509-532.

  162. Santamaría, L., Barge-Gil, A., and Modrego, A. 2010. Public selection and financing of R&D cooperative projects: Credit versus subsidy funding. Research Policy, 39(4): 549-563.

  163. Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional networks: industrial adaptation in Silicon Valley and route 128.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  164. Schumpeter, J. 1934. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy: New York: Harper and Row.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  165. Senker, J. 1995. Tacit knowledge and models of innovation. Industrial and corporate change, 4(2): 425-447.

  166. Shane, S. A. 2004. Academic entrepreneurship: University spin-offs and wealth creation: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  167. Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., and Wright, M. 2007. Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford review of economic policy, 23(4): 640-660.

  168. Steinmueller, W. E. 1994. Basic research and industrial innovation. The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Aldershot: 54-66.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  169. Storey, D. J. and Tether, B. S. 1998. New technology-based firms in the European Union: an introduction. Research policy, 26(9): 933-946.

  170. Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., and Thursby, M. C. 2001. Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major US universities. The journal of Technology transfer, 26(1-2): 59-72.

  171. Toole, A. A. 2007. Does public scientific research complement private investment in research and development in the pharmaceutical industry? The Journal of Law and Economics, 50(1): 81-104.

  172. Toole, A. A. 2012. The impact of public basic research on industrial innovation: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 41(1): 1-12.

  173. Vásquez-Urriago, . R., Barge-Gil, A., Rico, A. M., and Paraskevopoulou, E. 2014. The impact of science and technology parks on firms’ product innovation: empirical evidence from Spain. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(4): 835-873.

  174. Valero, A. and Van Reenen, J. 2016. The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  175. Veugelers, R. and Cassiman, B. 2005. R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(5): 355-379.

  176. Veugelers, R., Calis, E. A., Penning, C., Verhagen, A., Bernsen, R., Bouquet, J., Benninga, M. A., Merkus, P. J., Arets, H. G., Tibboel, D., and Evenhuis, H. M. 2005. A population-based nested case control study on recurrent pneumonias in children with severe generalized cerebral palsy: ethical considerations of the design and representativeness of the study sample. BMC Pediatr, 5(5–6): 25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  177. Vincett, P. S. 2010. The economic impacts of academic spin-off companies, and their implications for public policy. Research Policy, 39(6): 736-747.

  178. Warda, J. 2009. An update of R&D tax treatment in OECD countries and selected emerging economies, 2008-2009: mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  179. Yang, C. H., Huang, C. H., and Hou, T. C. T. 2012. Tax incentives and R&D activity: Firm-level evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, 41(9): 1578-1588.

  180. Zahra, S. A. and George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185-203.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  181. Zúñiga‐Vicente, J. ., Alonso‐Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J., and Galán, J. I. 2014. Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: a survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(1): 36-67.

  182. Zhang, J. 2009. The performance of university spin-offs: an exploratory analysis using venture capital data. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(3): 255-285.

  183. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., and Brewer, M. B. 1994. Intellectual capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  184. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., and Torero, M. 2002. Labor mobility from academe to commerce. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(3): 629-660.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. More than a new campus: Universitys spatial expansion, emerging knowledge cluster, and innovation growth. (2025). Wang, Qiao ; Zhang, Fan ; Liu, Xiuyan.
    In: China Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:chieco:v:91:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x2500077x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The partner next door? The effect of micro-geographical proximity on intra-cluster inter-organizational relationships. (2022). Guerini, Massimiliano ; Ferretti, Marco ; Panetti, Eva ; Parmentola, Adele.
    In: Technovation.
    RePEc:eee:techno:v:111:y:2022:i:c:s0166497221001711.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Innovation and Financial Performance in Manufacturing Companies: an Empirical Study Tunisian. (2021). Chouaibi, Jamel.
    In: Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
    RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:12:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-020-00692-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Innovative startup creation: the effect of local factors and demographic characteristics of entrepreneurs. (2021). Chierici, Roberto ; del Bosco, Barbara ; di Gregorio, Angelo ; Mazzucchelli, Alice.
    In: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal.
    RePEc:spr:intemj:v:17:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11365-019-00618-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Testing the role of intra-metropolitan local factors on knowledge-intensive industries’ location choices. (2021). Gómez-Antonio, Miguel ; Sweeney, Stuart ; Gomez-Antonio, Miguel.
    In: The Annals of Regional Science.
    RePEc:spr:anresc:v:66:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s00168-020-01035-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Whither geographic proximity? Bypassing local R&D units in foreign university collaboration. (2021). Kelchtermans, Stijn ; Belderbos, Rene ; Riccaboni, Massimo ; Grabowska, Marcelina ; Jacob, Jojo ; Leten, Bart.
    In: Journal of International Business Studies.
    RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:52:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1057_s41267-021-00413-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Proximity across the distant worlds of university–industry collaborations. (2021). Fitjar, Rune ; Riza, Utku Ali.
    In: Papers in Regional Science.
    RePEc:bla:presci:v:100:y:2021:i:3:p:689-711.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The Impact of Patents and R&D Cooperation on R&D Investments in a Differentiated Goods Industry. (2020). Prokop, Jacek ; Jacek, Prokop ; Adam, Karbowski.
    In: South East European Journal of Economics and Business.
    RePEc:vrs:seejeb:v:15:y:2020:i:1:p:122-133:n:10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Cross-faculty proximity and academic entrepreneurship: the role of business schools. (2020). Wyrwich, Michael ; Göthner, Maximilian ; Goethner, Maximilian.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:45:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10961-019-09725-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The effects of elite public colleges on primary and secondary schooling markets in India. (2020). Khanna, Gaurav ; Jagnani, Maulik.
    In: Journal of Development Economics.
    RePEc:eee:deveco:v:146:y:2020:i:c:s0304387820300870.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Cooperative knowledge creation in an uncertain network environment based on a dynamic knowledge supernetwork. (2019). Wu, Wenqing ; Zhao, Liming ; Zhang, Haihong.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:119:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03049-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Study on Higher Education Institutions and Local Development. (2019). Biancardi, Daniele ; Sánchez-Barrioluengo, Mabel ; Biagi, Federico ; Bonaccorsi, Andrea.
    In: JRC Research Reports.
    RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc117272.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Factors Influence China’s Off-Site Construction Technology Innovation Diffusion. (2019). Zhao, Zebin ; Dou, Yudan ; Luo, Xiaowei ; Xue, Xiaolong.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1849-:d:217659.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Citizens of somewhere: Examining the geography of foreign and native-born academics’ engagement with external actors. (2019). Lawson, Cornelia ; Kitson, Michael ; Salter, Ammon ; Hughes, Alan.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:48:y:2019:i:3:p:759-774.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe. (2019). Valero, Anna ; van Reenen, John.
    In: Economics of Education Review.
    RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:68:y:2019:i:c:p:53-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Location and research activities organization: Could public/private cooperation be harmful?. (2018). TAUGOURDEAU, Emmanuelle ; CABON-DHERSIN, Marie-Laure.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02023666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Location and research activities organization: Could public/private cooperation be harmful?. (2018). Taugourdeau, Emmanuelle ; Cabon-Dhersin, Marie-Laure.
    In: Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers).
    RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-02023666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Determinants of Innovation Cooperation Performance: What Do We Know and What Should We Know?. (2018). Pulecki, Ukasz ; Trpczyski, Piotr ; Staszkow, Micha.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4517-:d:186679.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The economic impact of universities: evidence from across the globe. (2018). Valero, Anna ; van Reenen, John.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:90227.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Universities and industrial strategy in the UK: review of evidence and implications for policy. (2018). Wyness, Gill ; Valero, Anna ; Murphy, Richard ; Azmat, Ghazala.
    In: CEP Industrial Strategy.
    RePEc:cep:cepisp:06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Shacklean Uncertainty and Cultural Embeddedness as Innovation Constraints in the UK. (2017). Tubadji, Annie ; Santarelli, Enrico ; Nijkamp, Peter.
    In: GLO Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:glodps:111.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Investigating the Human Capital Development€“growth Nexus. (2017). Zotti, Roberto ; Barra, Cristian.
    In: International Regional Science Review.
    RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:40:y:2017:i:6:p:638-678.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Cross-faculty proximity and academic entrepreneurship: The role of business schools. (2017). Wyrwich, Michael ; Göthner, Maximilian ; Goethner, Maximilian.
    In: Jena Economics Research Papers.
    RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2017-017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Public Funding and Corporate Innovation. (2017). Kaiser, Ulrich ; Beck, Mathias ; Junge, Martin.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11196.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Research, knowledge transfer and innovation: the effect of Italian universities’ efficiency on the local economic development 2006-2012. (2017). Zotti, Roberto ; Barra, Cristian ; Agasisti, Tommaso.
    In: Working papers.
    RePEc:ipu:wpaper:60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Why do firms collaborate with local universities?. (2017). Fitjar, Rune ; Gjelsvik, Martin.
    In: Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG).
    RePEc:egu:wpaper:1732.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. University-industry links and the determinants of their spatial scope: A study of the knowledge intensive business services sector. (2017). Huggins, Robert ; Johnston, Andrew.
    In: Papers in Regional Science.
    RePEc:bla:presci:v:96:y:2017:i:2:p:247-260.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Science and Technology Parks and cooperation for innovation: Empirical evidence from Spain. (2016). Barge-Gil, Andrés ; Rico, Aurelia Modrego ; Vasquez-Urriago, Angela Rocio .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:1:p:137-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Cluster and co-located cluster effects: An empirical study of six Chinese city regions. (2016). Reve, Torger ; Lu, Ren ; Ruan, Min.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:10:p:1984-1995.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The firms evaluation of local research institutes and universities - an empirical analysis for Germany. (2015). Cordes, Alexander ; Schasse, Ulrich.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa15p933.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Business Science Links For a New Growth Path. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 107. (2015). Janger, Jurgen.
    In: WIFO Studies.
    RePEc:wfo:wstudy:58413.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Do science parks promote research and technology? A scientometric analysis of the UK. (2015). Tijssen, Robert ; Thelwall, Mike ; Minguillo, David.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1435-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Patent co-ownership as an example of network analysis of inter- organizational relationships from territorial perspective (Wspolwlasnosc patentowa jako przyklad analizy sieci relacji miedzyorganizacyjnych w ujeciu terytorialnym). (2015). Sworowska, Anna.
    In: Problemy Zarzadzania.
    RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:13:i:50:y:2015:p:257-274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Global engagement in R&D: a portrait of biopharmaceutical patenting firms. (2015). Abramovsky, Laura.
    In: IFS Working Papers.
    RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:15/18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: The role of region-specific institutions. (2015). Piperopoulos, Panagiotis ; Zhang, Mingshen ; Kafouros, Mario ; Wang, Chengqi.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:3:p:803-817.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Place-Based Policies. (2015). Simpson, Helen ; Neumark, David.
    In: Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:regchp:5-1197.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Are ivory towers truly ivory? Knowledge spillovers and firm innovation. (2015). Lin, Shannon.
    In: Journal of Economics and Business.
    RePEc:eee:jebusi:v:80:y:2015:i:c:p:21-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. PUBLIC R&D POLICIES AND PRIVATE R&D INVESTMENT: A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE. (2015). Becker, Bettina.
    In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
    RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:29:y:2015:i:5:p:917-942.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Human capital development, knowledge spillovers and local growth: Is there a quality effect of university efficiency?. (2014). Zotti, Roberto ; Barra, Cristian.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:60065.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Place-Based Policies. (2014). Simpson, Helen ; Neumark, David.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:20049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The economic significance of the UK science base: a report for the Campaign for Science and Engineering. (2014). Haskel, Jonathan ; Bascavusoglu-Moreau, E ; Hughes, A.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:imp:wpaper:13751.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations. (2014). Levenstein, Margaret ; Hwang, Yongha ; Cotton-Nessler, Natalie ; Owen-Smith, Jason ; Kabo, Felichism W..
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:43:y:2014:i:9:p:1469-1485.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Place-Based Policies. (2014). Simpson, Helen ; Neumark, David.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:10131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Place-based policies. (2014). Simpson, Helen ; Neumark, David.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:btx:wpaper:1410.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. The Determinants of R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Research. (2013). Becker, Bettina.
    In: Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:lbo:lbowps:2013_09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Do R&D strategies in high-tech sectors differ from those in low-tech sectors? An alternative approach to testing the pooling assumption. (2013). Hall, Stephen ; Becker, Bettina.
    In: Economic Change and Restructuring.
    RePEc:kap:ecopln:v:46:y:2013:i:2:p:183-202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Did relational capital matter during the financial crisis?. (2013). Bykova, Anna ; Kuminova, Evgeniia .
    In: HSE Working papers.
    RePEc:hig:wpaper:23/fe/2013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Research cooperation within and across regional boundaries. Does innovation policy add anything?. (2012). Montresor, Sandro ; Marzucchi, Alberto ; Antonioli, Davide.
    In: JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation.
    RePEc:ipt:wpaper:201204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Research cooperation within and across regional boundaries. Does innovation policy add anything?. (2012). Montresor, Sandro ; Marzucchi, Alberto ; Antonioli, Davide.
    In: JRC Research Reports.
    RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc76320.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Collaboration between firms and universities in Italy: the role of a firm�s proximity to top-rated departments. (2012). Fantino, Davide.
    In: Temi di discussione (Economic working papers).
    RePEc:bdi:wptemi:td_884_12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  51. EXPLORING SPATIAL FEATURES OF SCIENCE-INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIPS: A STUDY ON FRENCH DATA. (2011). Pépin, Dominique ; ferru, marie ; Bouba-Olga, Olivier ; Pepin, Dominique.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00566109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  52. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-16 00:02:00 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.