Abeliansky, A. L. and Beulmann, M. (2019). Are they coming for us? Industrial robots and the mental health of workers. cege Discussion Papers, University of Göttingen, 379.
- Acemoglu and Autor (2011) standardized share of routine tasks -2-1 0 1 2 Within-occupation standardized share of automation risk Figure A.3: Comparison between Frey and Osborne (2017)’s measure of automation and ours (redefined at the occupational level) A0Z A1Z A2Z B0Z B1Z B2Z B3Z B4Z B5Z B6Z B7Z C1Z C2Z D1Z D2Z D3Z D4Z D6Z E0Z E1Z E2Z F1Z F4Z F5Z G0A G0B G1Z H0Z J0Z J1Z J3Z J4Z J5Z J6Z K0Z L0Z L1Z L2Z L3Z L4Z L5Z M1Z M2Z N0Z P0Z P1Z P2Z P4Z Q0Z Q1Z Q2Z R0Z R1Z R2Z R3Z R4Z S0Z S1Z S2Z S3Z T0Z T2A T2B T3Z T4Z U0Z U1Z V0Z V1Z V2Z V3Z V4Z V5Z W0Z W1Z ZZZ 0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Acemoglu, D. and Autor, D. (2011). Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings. In Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D., editors, Handbook of Labor Economics, volume 4 of Handbook of Labor Economics, chapter 12, pages 1043–1171. Elsevier.
Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2):3–30.
Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6):2188–2244.
- Arntz, M., Gregory, T., and Zierahn, U. (2016). The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 189, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Arntz, M., Gregory, T., and Zierahn, U. (2017). Revisiting the risk of automation. Economics Letters, 159.
Autor, D. and Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, 103(5).
Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3):3–30.
Autor, D., Levy, F., and Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4):1279–1333.
Becker, S. O. and Caliendo, M. (2007). Sensitivity analysis for average treatment e↵ects. Stata Journal, 7(1):71–83.
- Brynjolfsson, E. and McAfee, A. (2012). Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. New York, NY: Digital Frontier Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Caliendo, M., Mahlstedt, R., and Mitnik, O. A. (2017). Unobservable, but unimportant? The relevance of usually unobserved variables for the evaluation of labor market policies. Labour Economics, 46(C):14–25.
- COE (2017). Automatisation, numérisation et emploi - les impacts sur le volume, la structure et la localisation de l’emploi. rapport, Tome 1.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cottini, E. and Ghinetti, P. (2018). Employment insecurity and employees’ health in Denmark. Health Economics, 27.
DeCanio, S. (2016). Robots and humans—complements or substitutes? Journal of Macroeconomics, 49(C):280–291.
- Frey and Osborne (2017) probability of computerisability 0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 Within-occupation share of automation risk B Main and sensitivity analysis Figure B.1: Distribution of the propensity score on the matched and unmatched samples 0 2 4 6 8 0 .5 1 0 .5 1 Raw Matched (ATT) Untreated Treated Density Propensity score Figure B.2: ATT estimates using alternative matching techniques - health outcome: MDE-GAD; main automation risk measure ps kernel + em ps kernel + em + comsup ps kernel + em + probit ps kernel + em bdwith(0.05) ps kernel + em bdwith(0.025) ps kernel + em bdwith(0.01) ps kernel ps kernel + bdwith(0.05) ps kernel + bdwith(0.025) ps kernel + ra ps kernel + ra + bdwith(0.05) ps + NN1 ps + NN5 ps + ridge IPW 0 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 0.1 Source: French Working Conditions Survey 2013 and 2016.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Frey, C. B. and Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation ? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114:254 – 280.
Green, F. (2004). Work intensification, discretion, and the decline in well-being at work. Eastern Economic Journal, 30(4).
Innocenti, S. and Golin, M. (2022). Human capital investment and perceived automation risks: Evidence from 16 countries. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 195:27–41.
- Josten, C. and Lordan, G. (2020). Robots at Work: Automatable and Non-automatable Jobs, pages 1–24. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Karasek, R. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lechner, M. (2002). Program heterogeneity and propensity score matching: An application to the evaluation of active labor market policies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2):205–220.
Lordan, G. and Stringer, E.-J. (2022). People versus machines: The impact of being in an automatable job on australian workers mental health and life satisfaction. Economics & Human Biology, 46:101144.
Maurin, E. and Thesmar, D. (2004). Changes in the functional structure of firms and the demand for skill. Journal of Labor Economics, 22(3).
Nedelkoska, L. and Quintini, G. (2018). Automation, skills use and training. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris.
- Notes: Sample of 14,221 wage earners with non missing relevant observables interviewed both in 2013 and 2016. Measure of automation risk defined in Section 2. Reading: 49.4% of workers who declare having a routine job are classified as being exposed to the risk of automation.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Notes: Sample of wage earners with non-missing relevant observables interviewed both in 2013 and 2016. Measure of automation risk defined in Section 2. Exact matching on gender, age, education and sector (private/public) categories combined with propensity score-kernel matching with the full set of controls (see Figure 1 for the list of variables included in the propensity score estimation). Bootstrapped standard errors.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Notes: Sample of wage earners with non-missing relevant observables, interviewed both in 2013 and 2016. Weighted statistics.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Notes: Sample: analysis restricted to the jobs containing at least 20 surveyed individuals. Weighted statistics Figure A.2: Comparison between Acemoglu and Dorn (2013)’s measure of automation and ours (redefined at the occupational level) A0Z A1Z A2Z B0Z B1Z B2Z B3Z B4Z B5Z B6Z B7Z C1Z C2Z D1Z D2Z D3Z D4Z D6Z E0Z E1Z E2Z F1Z F4Z F5Z G0A G0B G1Z H0Z J0Z J1Z J3Z J4Z J5Z J6Z K0Z L0Z L1Z L2Z L3Z L4Z L5Z M1Z M2Z N0Z P0Z P1Z P2Z P4Z Q0Z Q1Z Q2Z R0Z R1Z R2Z R3Z R4Z S0Z S1Z S2Z S3Z T0Z T2A T3Z T4Z U0Z U1Z V0Z V1Z V2Z V3Z V4Z V5Z W0Z W1Z ZZZ -2 -1 0 1 2
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Notes: Separate analysis on sub-samples among wage earners with non missing relevant observables interviewed both in 2013 and 2016.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Notes: Separate analysis on sub-samples among wage earners with non-missing relevant observables interviewed both in 2013 and 2016.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Notes: Separate analysis on sub-samples among wage earners with non-missing relevant observables interviewed both in 2013 and 2016.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Patel, P. C., Devaraj, S., Hicks, M. J., and Wornell, E. J. (2018). County-level job automation risk and health: Evidence from the united states. Social Science & Medicine, 202:54–60.
Reichert, A. and Tauchmann, H. (2017). Workforce reduction, subjective job insecurity, and mental health. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 133(C):187–212.
- Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies. New York: Springer, 2nd edition.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal e↵ects. Biometrika, 70(1):41–55.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schwabe, H. and Castellacci, F. (2020). Automation, workers’ skills and job satisfaction. PLOS One, 15(11).
- Table A.4: Automation exposure by occupation Automation risk rate N Unskilled workers .433 592 Skilled workers .356 1703 Sales employees .287 458 Employees - public sector .249 2801 Employees - private sector .221 421 Employees - firm administration .174 826 Technicians .143 659 Intermediate professions - firm administration and sales .13 883 Foremen .103 332 Intermediate professions - public sector .095 2753 Executive manager - private sector .035 1195 Executive manager - public sector .033 1421 Source: French Working Conditions Survey 2016. Notes: Sample: analysis restricted to occupation categories containing at least 20 surveyed individuals. Weighted statistics.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now