create a website

Efficiency Evaluation of Assets and Optimal Portfolio Generation by Cross Efficiency and Cumulative Prospect Theory. (2024). Srivastava, Sweksha ; Bansal, Pooja ; Aggarwal, Abha.
In: Computational Economics.
RePEc:kap:compec:v:63:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10614-022-10334-7.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 59

References cited by this document

Cocites: 45

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Amin, G. R., & Hajjami, M. (2021). Improving dea cross-efficiency optimization in portfolio selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 168, 114280.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Anderson, T. R., Hollingsworth, K., & Inman, L. (2002). The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17(3), 249–255.

  3. Bansal, P., & Mehra, A. (2022). Integrated dynamic interval data envelopment analysis in the presence of integer and negative data. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 18(2), 1339.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Basso, A., & Funari, S. (2001). A data envelopment analysis approach to measure the mutual fund performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 135(3), 477–492.

  5. Bernard, C., & Ghossoub, M. (2010). Static portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory. Mathematics and Financial Economics, 2(4), 277–306.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.

  7. Chen, X., Liu, X., Wang, W., & Gong, Z. (2020). Behavioral dea model and its application to the efficiency evaluation of manufacturing transformation and upgrading in the yangtze river delta. Soft Computing, 24(14), 10721–10738.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Consigli, G., Hitaj, A., & Mastrogiacomo, E. (2019). Portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory: sensitivity analysis and an empirical study. Computational Management Science, 16(1), 129–154.

  9. d Gong, C., Xu, C., Ando, M., & Xi, X. (2018). A new method of portfolio optimization under cumulative prospect theory. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 23(1), 75–86.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. De Giorgi, E., & Hens, T. (2006). Making prospect theory fit for finance. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 20(3), 339–360.

  11. Deng, L., Liu, Z., & Tan, J. (2022). Optimal portfolio and consumption choices of retirees with uncertain lifetimes under cumulative prospect theory. Applied Economics, 1–27.

  12. Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1994). Efficiency and cross-efficiency in dea: Derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567–578.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Emrouznejad, A., Amin, G. R., Thanassoulis, E., & Anouze, A. L. (2010). On the boundedness of the sorm dea models with negative data. European Journal of Operational Research, 206(1), 265–268.

  14. Emrouznejad, A., Anouze, A. L., & Thanassoulis, E. (2010). A semi-oriented radial measure for measuring the efficiency of decision making units with negative data, using dea. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 297–304.

  15. Essid, H., Ganouati, J., & Vigeant, S. (2018). A mean-maverick game cross-efficiency approach to portfolio selection: An application to paris stock exchange. Expert Systems with Applications, 113, 161–185.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Fan, J., Liu, J., & Wu, M. (2019). Improvement of cross-efficiency based on prospect theory. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 37(3), 4391–4404.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Fang, L., & Yang, J. (2019). An integrated ranking approach using cross-efficiency intervals and the cumulative prospect theory. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 136, 556–574.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Gardijan, M., & Škrinjarić, T. (2015). Equity portfolio optimization: A dea based methodology applied to the zagreb stock exchange. Croatian Operational Research Review, 6(2), 405–417.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Gazioğlu, Ş, & Çalışkan, N. (2011). Cumulative prospect theory challenges traditional expected utility theory. Applied Financial Economics, 21(21), 1581–1586.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Green, R. H., Doyle, J. R., & Cook, W. D. (1996). Preference voting and project ranking using dea and cross-evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 90(3), 461–472.

  21. Grishina, N., Lucas, C. A., & Date, P. (2017). Prospect theory-based portfolio optimization: an empirical study and analysis using intelligent algorithms. Quantitative Finance, 17(3), 353–367.

  22. Gupta, S., Bandyopadhyay, G., Bhattacharjee, M., & Biswas, S. (2019). Portfolio selection using dea-copras at risk-return interface based on nse (india). International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(10), 4078–4086.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Gurevich, G., Kliger, D., & Levy, O. (2009). Decision-making under uncertainty - a field study of cumulative prospect theory. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(7), 1221–1229.

  24. Hatami-Marbini, A., Emrouznejad, A., & Agrell, P. J. (2014). Interval data without sign restrictions in dea. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(7–8), 2028–2036.

  25. Hens, T., & Mayer, J. (2017). Cumulative prospect theory and mean-variance analysis: a rigorous comparison. Journal of Computational Finance, 21(3), 47–73.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Huang, C., Chiou, C., Wu, T., & Yang, S. (2015). An integrated dea-modm methodology for portfolio optimization. Operational Research, 15(1), 115–136.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Joro, T., & Na, P. (2006). Portfolio performance evaluation in a mean-variance-skewness framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 446–461.

  28. Kahneman, D. & Tversky A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I, (pp. 99–127). World Scientific.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Kao, C., & Liu, S. (2020). A slacks-based measure model for calculating cross efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Omega, 95, 102192.

  30. Lim, S., & Zhu, J. (2015). Dea cross-efficiency evaluation under variable returns to scale. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(3), 476–487.

  31. Lim, S., Oh, K. W., & Zhu, J. (2014). Use of DEA cross-efficiency evaluation in portfolio selection: An application to Korean stock market. European Journal of Operational Research, 236(1), 361–368.

  32. Lin, R. (2020). Cross-efficiency evaluation capable of dealing with negative data: A directional distance function based approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(3), 505–516.

  33. Liu, H., Song, Y., & Yang, G. (2019). Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 273(1), 364–375.

  34. Liu, S., Xu, X., Grant, L., Strong, J., & Fang, Z. (2017). Professional standards and performance evaluation for principals in china: A policy analysis of the development of principal standards. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 45(2), 238–259.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Lu, W. M., & Lo, S. F. (2007). A closer look at the economic-environmental disparities for regional development in china. European Journal of Operational Research, 183(2), 882–894.

  36. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Mashayekhi, Z., & Omrani, H. (2016). An integrated multi-objective markowitz-dea cross-efficiency model with fuzzy returns for portfolio selection problem. Applied Soft Computing, 38, 1–9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Matin, R. K., Amin, G. R., & Emrouznejad, A. (2014). A modified semi-oriented radial measure for target setting with negative data. Measurement, 54, 152–158.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Morey, M. R., & Morey, R. C. (1999). Mutual fund performance appraisals: a multi-horizon perspective with endogenous benchmarking. Omega, 27(2), 241–258.

  40. Murthi, B. P. S., Choi, Y. K., & Desai, P. (1997). Efficiency of mutual funds and portfolio performance measurement: A non-parametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 408–418.

  41. Oral, M., Kettani, O., & Lang, P. (1991). A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial randd projects. Management science, 37(7), 871–885.

  42. Pirvu, T. A., & Schulze, K. (2012). Multi-stock portfolio optimization under prospect theory. Mathematics and Financial Economics, 6(4), 337–362.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Portela, M. C. A. S., Thanassoulis, E., & Simpson, G. (2004). A directional distance approach to deal with negative data in DEA: An application to bank branches. Journal of Operational Research Society, 55(10), 1111–1121.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 323–343.

  45. Ruiz, J. L. (2013). Cross-efficiency evaluation with directional distance functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(1), 181–189.

  46. Ruß, J., & Schelling, S. (2018). Multi cumulative prospect theory and the demand for cliquet-style guarantees. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 85(4), 1103–1125.

  47. Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., & Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(32), 73–105.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Shao, X., & Wang, M. (2022). Two-stage cross-efficiency evaluation based on prospect theory. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(7), 1620–1632.

  49. Sharp, J. A., Meng, W., & Liu, W. (2007). A modified slacks-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with “natural’’ negative outputs and inputs. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(12), 1672–1677.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. The Journal of business, 39(1), 119–138.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Simo-Kengne, B. D., Ababio, K. A., Mba, J., & Koumba, U. (2018). Behavioral portfolio selection and optimization: an application to international stocks. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 32(3), 311–328.

  52. Srivastava, S., Aggarwal, A., & Mehra, A. (2022). Portfolio selection by cumulative prospect theory and its comparison with mean-variance model. Granular Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00302-1 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Tohidi, G., and Razavyan, S. (2012). Cross efficiency of decision making units with the negative data in data envelopment analysis. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Istanbul, Turkey.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.

  55. Wang, L., Wang, Y., & Martínez, L. (2017). A group decision method based on prospect theory for emergency situations. Information Sciences, 418, 119–135.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Wu, D. (2016). Robust decision support system for asset assessment and management. IEEE Systems Journal, 11(3), 1486–1491.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Wu, J., Chu, J., Sun, J., Zhu, Q., & Liang, L. (2016). Extended secondary goal models for weights selection in dea cross-efficiency evaluation. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 93, 143–151.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Wu, J., Liang, L., & Chen, Y. (2009). DEA game cross-efficiency approach to olympic rankings. Omega, 37(4), 909–918.

  59. Yu, Y., Zhu, W., Shi, Q., & Zhuang, S. (2021). Common set of weights in data envelopment analysis under prospect theory. Expert Systems, 38(1), 12602.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Efficiency evaluation with data uncertainty. (2024). Zhou, Zhixiang ; Zhu, Qingyuan ; Shen, Lulu ; Wu, Jie ; Zhang, Ganggang.
    In: Annals of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:annopr:v:339:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04636-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Efficiency Evaluation of Assets and Optimal Portfolio Generation by Cross Efficiency and Cumulative Prospect Theory. (2024). Srivastava, Sweksha ; Bansal, Pooja ; Aggarwal, Abha.
    In: Computational Economics.
    RePEc:kap:compec:v:63:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10614-022-10334-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Nash Bargaining Game Enhanced Global Malmquist Productivity Index for Cross-Productivity Index. (2024). Tan, Yong ; Fallahnejad, Reza ; Wanke, Peter Fernandes ; Mozaffari, Mohammad Reza.
    In: Games.
    RePEc:gam:jgames:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:3-:d:1325175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Evaluation of intercity road passenger transportation using a novel double-frontier game-regret-cross-efficiency. (2024). Ganji, S S ; Ajirlu, Shahrouz Fathi ; Dehghani, Alireza.
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:93:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124000685.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. How can sociological theories provide legitimacy to eco-efficiency evaluations? Embark on a journey toward understanding. (2024). Cui, Yuan ; Huang, Yi-Di ; Pan, Hao ; Yang, Guo-Liang.
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:93:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124000557.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Resilience, efficiency fluctuations, and regional heterogeneity in disaster: An empirical study on logistics. (2024). Gong, Yeming ; Xu, Xianhao ; Xue, Longfei ; Yang, Bingnan.
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:93:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124000533.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Domain-specific valuation of university technologies using bibliometrics, Jonckheere–Terpstra tests, and data envelopment analysis. (2023). Kang, Yubin ; Hong, Suckwon ; Kim, Juram ; Lee, Changyong.
    In: Technovation.
    RePEc:eee:techno:v:122:y:2023:i:c:s0166497222002152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Global Inclusive and Sustainable Competitive Industrial Performance (ISCIP): An efficiency based spatio-temporal analysis for 139 countries. (2023). Wang, Ke ; Xu, Yunqing ; Yuan, Qianqian ; Cantore, Nicola ; Hua, Cheng ; Chin, Charles Fang.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:333:y:2023:i:c:s0306261922018608.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A modified DEA cross efficiency method with negative data and its application in supplier selection. (2022). Soltanifar, Mehdi ; Sharafi, Hamid.
    In: Journal of Combinatorial Optimization.
    RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:43:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-021-00765-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Uncertain random data envelopment analysis for technical efficiency. (2022). Feng, Wenxue ; Li, Jian ; Jiang, Bao.
    In: Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making.
    RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:21:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10700-021-09361-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Cross Malmquist Productivity Index in Data Envelopment Analysis. (2022). Fallahnejad, Reza ; Lotfi, Farhad Hosseinzadeh ; Homayoni, Ali.
    In: 4OR.
    RePEc:spr:aqjoor:v:20:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10288-021-00489-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Business analytics for corporate risk management and performance improvement. (2022). Hsin, Ying-Shao ; Hsu, Ming-Fu ; Shiue, Fu-Jiing.
    In: Annals of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:annopr:v:315:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04259-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. A bargaining approach to determine common weights in DEA. (2021). Lozano, S ; Hinojosa, M A ; Contreras, I.
    In: Operational Research.
    RePEc:spr:operea:v:21:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s12351-019-00498-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Data envelopment analysis cross efficiency evaluation with reciprocal behaviors. (2021). Zhu, Qingyuan ; Liang, Liang ; Wu, Han ; Kou, Gang.
    In: Annals of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:annopr:v:302:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04027-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A neutral cross-efficiency evaluation method based on interval reference points in consideration of bounded rational behavior. (2021). Wang, Ying-Ming ; Chen, Sheng-Qun ; Shi, Hai-Liu.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:290:y:2021:i:3:p:1098-1110.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. An evaluation of cross-efficiency methods: With an application to warehouse performance. (2021). Zofío, José ; Balk, Bert ; Zofio, Jose L ; Kaps, Christian ; ) De Koster, M. B. M., .
    In: Applied Mathematics and Computation.
    RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:406:y:2021:i:c:s0096300321003507.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Investigating socio-economic ranking of cities in Turkey using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). (2020). Unsal, Mehmet Guray ; Nazman, Ezgi.
    In: Annals of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:annopr:v:294:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-017-2748-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Improving the discrimination power with a new multi-criteria data envelopment model. (2020). Augusto, Fernando ; Dias, Erica Ximenes ; Silva, Aneirson Francisco.
    In: Annals of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:annopr:v:287:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03446-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Exploiting value system multiplicity and preference voting for robust ranking. (2020). Oukil, Amar.
    In: Omega.
    RePEc:eee:jomega:v:94:y:2020:i:c:s0305048318311113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Biofuel logistics network scheme design with combined data envelopment analysis approach. (2020). Mwakalonge, Judith L ; Hong, Jae-Dong.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:209:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220314493.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Port Efficiency Incorporating Service Measurement Variables by the BiO-MCDEA: Brazilian Case. (2019). Lee, Suhyung ; de Andrade, Renata Machado ; Kwon, Oh Kyoung ; Chung, Hye Min.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4340-:d:256733.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect theory. (2019). Song, Yao-Yao ; Liu, Hui-Hui ; Yang, Guo-Liang.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:273:y:2019:i:1:p:364-375.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. A Measure of Well-Being Across the Italian Urban Areas: An Integrated DEA-Entropy Approach. (2018). Nissi, Eugenia ; Sarra, Annalina.
    In: Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement.
    RePEc:spr:soinre:v:136:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-016-1535-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. A DEA ranking method based on cross-efficiency intervals and signal-to-noise ratio. (2018). Liu, Shiang-Tai.
    In: Annals of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:annopr:v:261:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-017-2562-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. A systematic approach for ranking football players within an integrated DEA‐OWA framework. (2017). Oukil, Amar ; Govindaluri, Srikrishna Madhumohan.
    In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
    RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:38:y:2017:i:8:p:1125-1136.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Measuring the R&D efficiency of regions by a parallel DEA game model. (2017). Zuo, Kairui ; Guan, Jiancheng.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:112:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2380-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Fuzzy cross-efficiency evaluation: a possibility approach. (2017). Sirvent, Inmaculada ; Ruiz, Jose L.
    In: Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making.
    RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:16:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10700-016-9240-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Ecological Efficiency Based Ranking of Cities: A Combined DEA Cross-Efficiency and Shannon’s Entropy Method. (2016). lo Storto, Corrado.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:124-:d:63124.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement. (2016). Zhu, Qingyuan ; Chu, Junfei ; Wu, Jie ; Sun, Jiasen.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:248:y:2016:i:2:p:571-579.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A modification of a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model to avoid the computational complexity. (2015). Unsal, Mehmet ; Orkcu, H ; Bal, Hasan .
    In: Annals of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:annopr:v:235:y:2015:i:1:p:599-623:10.1007/s10479-015-1916-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. A bi-objective weighted model for improving the discrimination power in MCDEA. (2014). Ignatius, Joshua ; GHASEMI, M.-R., ; Emrouznejad, Ali.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:233:y:2014:i:3:p:640-650.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Cross-efficiency aggregation in DEA models using the evidential-reasoning approach. (2013). Li, Xiao-xuan ; Liu, Wen-Bin ; Yang, Jian-Bo.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:231:y:2013:i:2:p:393-404.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Cross-efficiency evaluation with directional distance functions. (2013). Ruiz, José.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:228:y:2013:i:1:p:181-189.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. A multiple criteria ranking method based on game cross-evaluation approach. (2012). Liang, Liang ; Wu, Jie.
    In: Annals of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:annopr:v:197:y:2012:i:1:p:191-200:10.1007/s10479-010-0817-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. On the DEA total weight flexibility and the aggregation in cross-efficiency evaluations. (2012). Sirvent, Inmaculada ; Ruiz, José.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:223:y:2012:i:3:p:732-738.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Enhancement of equity portfolio performance using data envelopment analysis. (2012). Pätäri, Eero ; Leivo, Timo ; Honkapuro, Samuli ; Patari, Eero.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:220:y:2012:i:3:p:786-797.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Reducing differences between profiles of weights: A peer-restricted cross-efficiency evaluation. (2011). Sirvent, Inmaculada ; Ruiz, José ; Ramón, Nuria ; Ramon, Nuria.
    In: Omega.
    RePEc:eee:jomega:v:39:y:2011:i:6:p:634-641.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The use of OWA operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregation. (2011). Wang, Ying-Ming ; Chin, Kwai-Sang.
    In: Omega.
    RePEc:eee:jomega:v:39:y:2011:i:5:p:493-503.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. (2010). Wang, Ying-Ming ; Chin, Kwai-Sang.
    In: International Journal of Production Economics.
    RePEc:eee:proeco:v:128:y:2010:i:1:p:332-338.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations. (2010). Sirvent, Inmaculada ; Ruiz, José ; Ramón, Nuria ; Ramon, Nuria.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:207:y:2010:i:3:p:1564-1572.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Performance evaluation: An integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations. (2009). Wu, Dash.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:194:y:2009:i:1:p:227-235.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on. (2009). Seiford, Lawrence ; Cook, Wade D..
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:192:y:2009:i:1:p:1-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. The DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model and Its Nash Equilibrium. (2008). Cook, Wade D ; Liang, Liang ; Zhu, Joe ; Wu, Jie.
    In: Operations Research.
    RePEc:inm:oropre:v:56:y:2008:i:5:p:1278-1288.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. (2008). Cook, Wade D. ; Liang, Liang ; Zhu, Joe ; Wu, Jie.
    In: International Journal of Production Economics.
    RePEc:eee:proeco:v:113:y:2008:i:2:p:1025-1030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Hedge fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis. (2005). Sedzro, Komlan ; Zhu, Joe ; Gregoriou, Greg N..
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:164:y:2005:i:2:p:555-571.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-23 02:33:46 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.