create a website

State lottery in the lab: an experiment in external validity. (2021). Rachubik, Joanna ; Kachurka, Raman ; Krawczyk, Micha.
In: Experimental Economics.
RePEc:kap:expeco:v:24:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10683-020-09696-2.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 43

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. What drives demand for loot boxes? An experimental study. (2024). Dertwinkel-Kalt, Markus ; Cordes, Simon ; Werner, Tobias.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:228:y:2024:i:c:s016726812400369x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alm, J., Bloomquist, K. M., & McKee, M. (2015). On the external validity of laboratory tax compliance experiments. Economic Inquiry, 53, 1170–1186.

  2. Andersen, S., Ertaç, S., Gneezy, U., Hoffman, M., & List, J. A. (2011). Stakes matter in ultimatum games. American Economic Review, 101, 3427–3439. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.7.3427 .

  3. Ariyabuddhiphongs, V., & Chanchalermporn, N. (2007). A test of social cognitive theory reciprocal and sequential effects: Hope, superstitious belief and environmental factors among lottery gamblers in Thailand. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 201–214.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Armantier, O., & Treich, N. (2015). The Rich Domain Of Risk. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2215 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Aydogan, I., & Gao, Y. (2020). Experience and rationality under risk: Re-examining the impact of sampling experience. Exp Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-019-09641-y .

  6. Barseghyan, L., Prince, J., & Teitelbaum, J. C. (2011). Are risk preferences stable across contexts? Evidence from insurance data. American Economic Review, 101, 591–631.

  7. Beyerlein, K., & Sallaz, J. J. (2017). Faith’s wager: How religion deters gambling. Social Science Research, 62, 204–218.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Bohm, P., & Lind, H. (1993). Preference reversal, real-world lotteries, and lottery-interested subjects. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 22, 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(93)90005-A .

  9. Chark, R., Chew, S. H., & Zhong, S. (2020). Individual preference for longshots. Journal of the European Economic Association, 18, 1009–1039. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvz004 .

  10. Charness, G., Garcia, T., Offerman, T., & Villeval, M. C. (2019). Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory? GATE WP 1921. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3398841 .

  11. Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Imas, A. (2013). Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 87, 43–51.

  12. Cleave, B. L., Nikiforakis, N., & Slonim, R. (2013). Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences. Experimental Economics, 16, 372–382.

  13. Coups, E., Haddock, G., & Webley, P. (1998). Correlates and predictors of lottery play in the United Kingdom. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022009726406 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Dai, Z., Galeotti, F., & Villeval, M. C. (2017). Cheating in the lab predicts fraud in the field: An experiment in public transportation. Management Science, 64, 1081–1100. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2616 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, 522–550.

  16. Dorsey, R., & Razzolini, L. (2003). Explaining overbidding in first price auctions using controlled lotteries. Experimental Economics, 6, 123–140.

  17. Einav, L., Finkelstein, A., Pascu, I., & Cullen, M. R. (2012). How general are risk preferences? Choices under uncertainty in different domains. American Economic Review, 102, 2606–2638.

  18. Exadaktylos, F., Espín, A. M., & Brañas-Garza, P. (2013). Experimental subjects are not different. Sci Rep, 3, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01213 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Falk, A., Meier, S., & Zehnder, C. (2013). Do lab experiments misrepresent social preferences? The case of self-selected student samples. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11, 839–852.

  20. Fehr-Duda, H., Bruhin, A., Epper, T., & Schubert, R. (2010). Rationality on the rise: Why relative risk aversion increases with stake size. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 40, 147–180.

  21. Galizzi, M. M., & Navarro-Martinez, D. (2019). On the external validity of social preference games: a systematic lab-field study. Management Science, 65, 976–1002.

  22. Galizzi, M. M., Machado, S. R., & Miniaci, R. (2016). Temporal stability, cross-validity, and external validity of risk preferences measures: Experimental evidence from a UK representative sample. (p. 127). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2822613 .

  23. George, B. (2002). The relationship between lottery ticket and scratch-card buying behaviour, personality and other compulsive behaviours. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 2, 7–22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Golec, J., & Tamarkin, M. (1998). Bettors love skewness, not risk, at the horse track. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 205–225.

  25. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Griffiths, M., & Wood, R. (2001). The psychology of lottery gambling. International Gambling Studies, 1, 27–45.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  27. Grossman, P. J., & Eckel, C. C. (2015). Loving the long shot: Risk taking with skewed lotteries. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 51, 195–217.

  28. Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 1009–1055.

  29. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15, 534–539.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92, 1644–1655.

  31. Kessler, J. B., & Vesterlund, L. (2015). The external validity of laboratory experiments: Qualitative rather than quantitative effects. In Handbook of experimental economic methodology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195328325.003.0020 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Kontek, K., & Lewandowski, M. (2018). Range-dependent utility. Management Science, 64, 2812–2832.

  33. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 363–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529786 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Levitt, S. D. & List, J. A. (2006). What do laboratory experiments tell us about the real world. Presented at the Journal of Economic Perspectives, Citeseer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. List, J. A. (2020). Non est Disputandum de Generalizability? A Glimpse into The External Validity Trial (Working Paper No. 27535), Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27535 .

  36. Mata, R., Frey, R., Richter, D., Schupp, J., & Hertwig, R. (2018). Risk preference: A view from psychology. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32, 155–172.

  37. McDaniel, S. R., & Zuckerman, M. (2003). The relationship of impulsive sensation seeking and gender to interest and participation in gambling activities. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1385–1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00357-4 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Murphy, J. J., & Stevens, T. H. (2004). Contingent valuation, hypothetical bias, and experimental economics. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 33, 182–192.

  39. Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling: A theoretical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023042708217 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Rogers, P., & Webley, P. (2001). “It Could Be Us!”: Cognitive and social psychological factors in UK national lottery play. Applied Psychology, 50, 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00053 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Trautmann, S. T., & Van De Kuilen, G. (2015). Ambiguity attitudes. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 89–116.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  42. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and uncertainty, 5, 297–323.

  43. Vollmer, E., Hermann, D., & Mußhoff, O. (2017). Is the risk attitude measured with the Holt and Laury task reflected in farmers’ production risk? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 44, 399–424.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Media Bias and Tax Compliance: Experimental Evidence. (2023). Sabatini, Fabio ; Reggiani, Tommaso ; Špalek, Jiří ; Fišar, Miloš ; Fiar, Milo.
    In: MUNI ECON Working Papers.
    RePEc:mub:wpaper:2020-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Media negativity bias and tax compliance: experimental evidence. (2022). Sabatini, Fabio ; Reggiani, Tommaso ; Špalek, Jiří ; Fišar, Miloš ; Fiar, Milo.
    In: International Tax and Public Finance.
    RePEc:kap:itaxpf:v:29:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s10797-021-09706-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. What do lab experiments tell us about the real world? The case of lotteries with extreme payoffs. (2020). Rachubik, Joanna ; Kachurka, Raman ; Krawczyk, Micha.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2020-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Who Responds? Disentangling the Effects of Audits on Individual Tax Compliance Behavior. (2020). McKee, Michael ; Enami, Ali ; Alm, James.
    In: Atlantic Economic Journal.
    RePEc:kap:atlecj:v:48:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11293-020-09672-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Media Bias and Tax Compliance: Experimental Evidence. (2020). Sabatini, Fabio ; Reggiani, Tommaso ; Špalek, Jiří ; Fišar, Miloš ; Fiar, Milo.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12938.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The effects of official and unofficial information on tax compliance. (2020). Vezzulli, Andrea ; Opromolla, Luca David ; Garcia, Filomena ; Marques, Rafael.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:78:y:2020:i:c:s0167487020300222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. How much can we learn about voluntary climate action from behavior in public goods games?. (2020). Schwieren, Christiane ; Lohse, Johannes ; Goeschl, Timo ; Kettner, Sara Elisa.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:171:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919302745.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Comparing Compliance Behaviour of Students and Farmers. An Extra‐laboratory Experiment in the Context of Agri‐environmental Nudges in Germany. (2020). Musshoff, Oliver ; Peth, Denise.
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:71:y:2020:i:2:p:601-615.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. What Motivates Tax Compliance. (2019). Alm, James.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:tul:wpaper:1903.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Appeals to Social Norms and Taxpayer Compliance. (2019). Yan, Jubo ; Alm, James ; Schulze, William D ; von Bose, Carrie.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:tul:wpaper:1902.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The effect of reporting institutions on tax evasion:Evidence from the lab. (2019). Miettinen, Topi ; Nurminen, Tuomas ; Metslampi, Satu ; Kotakorpi, Kaisa.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tkk:dpaper:dp127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Two sides of the same coin? An investigation of the effects of frames on tax compliance and charitable giving. (2019). Dijk, Wilco W ; Lozza, Edoardo ; Castiglioni, Cinzia.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:5:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-019-0247-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Investigating Potential Impacts of Credit Failure Risk Mitigation on Habitat Exchange Outcomes. (2019). Hansen, Kristiana ; Lamb, Karsyn ; Bastian, Christopher ; Ritten, Chian Jones ; Nagler, Amy.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00332-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Taxation with Mobile High-Income Agents: Experimental Evidence on Tax Compliance and Equity Perceptions. (2019). Casal, Sandro ; Grimm, Veronika ; Schachtele, Simeon.
    In: Games.
    RePEc:gam:jgames:v:10:y:2019:i:4:p:42-:d:275338.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. On the Collective Choice among Models of Social Protection: An Experimental Study. (2019). Ottone, Stefania ; Farina, Francesco ; Ponzano, Ferruccio.
    In: Games.
    RePEc:gam:jgames:v:10:y:2019:i:4:p:41-:d:275258.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Framing and salience effects in tax evasion decisions – An experiment on underreporting and overdeducting. (2019). Wolf, Nadja ; Fochmann, Martin.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:72:y:2019:i:c:p:260-277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Does change in ownership affect community attitudes toward renewable energy projects? Evidence of a status quo bias. (2019). Toney, P ; Simonsen, M ; Linnerud, K ; Holden, E.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:131:y:2019:i:c:p:1-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Commitment to pay taxes: Results from field and laboratory experiments. (2019). Koessler, Ann-Kathrin ; Frey, Bruno ; Feld, Lars ; Torgler, Benno.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:115:y:2019:i:c:p:78-98.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Comparing compliance behaviour of students and farmers: Implications for agricultural policy impact analysis. (2018). Musshoff, Oliver ; Peth, Denise.
    In: DARE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:daredp:1809.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Less cheating? The effects of prefilled forms on compliance behavior. (2018). Muller, Nadja ; Overesch, Michael ; Fochmann, Martin.
    In: arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research.
    RePEc:zbw:arqudp:227.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The role of experiments for policy design. (2018). Werner, Peter ; Riedl, Arno.
    In: Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umagsb:2018022.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. High-Quality Input Choice under Uncertainty and Ambiguity: An Exploratory Study of Costa Ricas Coffee Sector. (2018). Arzadun, Paula ; Navarro, Monica ; Solis, Martin ; Najera, Joselyne.
    In: Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies.
    RePEc:rnd:arjebs:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:156-166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Behavioral dynamics of tax compliance when taxpayer assistance services are available. (2018). Vossler, Christian ; McKee, Michael ; Siladke, Caleb A.
    In: International Tax and Public Finance.
    RePEc:kap:itaxpf:v:25:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10797-017-9466-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. An experimental analysis of tax avoidance policies. (2018). Malik, Samreen ; Timme, Florian ; Mihm, Benedikt.
    In: International Tax and Public Finance.
    RePEc:kap:itaxpf:v:25:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10797-017-9448-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Cheating in the Lab Predicts Fraud in the Field: An Experiment in Public Transportation. (2018). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Galeotti, Fabio ; Dai, Zhixin.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:64:y:2018:i:3:p:1081-1100.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Cheating in the Lab Predicts Fraud in the Field: An experiment in public transportations. (2018). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Galeotti, Fabio ; DAI, ZHIXIN.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01348517.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Tax evasion, testosterone and personality traits. (2018). Mattos, Enlinson ; Arbex, Marcelo ; Geniole, Shawn N ; Carre, Justin M.
    In: Textos para discussão.
    RePEc:fgv:eesptd:466.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. How social preferences influence the stability of a climate coalition. (2018). Lin, Yu-Hsuan.
    In: ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT.
    RePEc:fan:efeefe:v:html10.3280/efe2018-002008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Carbon offsets out of the woods? Acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes in the lab. (2018). Carattini, Stefano ; Baranzini, Andrea ; Borzykowski, Nicolas.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:87732.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Attitude–behavior consistency in tax compliance: A cross-national comparison. (2018). Guerra, Alice ; Harrington, Brooke.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:156:y:2018:i:c:p:184-205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Carbon offsets out of the woods? Acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes in the lab. (2018). Carattini, Stefano ; Baranzini, Andrea ; Borzykowski, Nicolas.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:32:y:2018:i:c:p:1-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Controlling an Invasive Species through Consumption: The Case of Lionfish as an Impure Public Good. (2018). McEvoy, David ; Huth, William L ; Morgan, Ashton O.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:149:y:2018:i:c:p:74-79.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Testing the Waters: Behavior across Participant Pools. (2018). Yariv, Leeat ; Snowberg, Erik.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13015.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Testing the Waters: Behavior across Participant Pools. (2018). Yariv, Leeat ; Snowberg, Erik.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7136.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. When You Know Your Neighbour Pays Taxes: Information, Peer Effects, and Tax Compliance. (2017). McKee, Michael ; Alm, James ; Bloomquist, Kim M.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:vuw:vuwcpf:6775.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. The effects of physical activity on social interactions: The case of trust and trustworthiness. (2017). Papa, Stefano ; Di Bartolomeo, Giovanni.
    In: wp.comunite.
    RePEc:ter:wpaper:00134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Green Taxes in a Post-Paris World: Are Millions of Nays Inevitable?. (2017). Thalmann, Philippe ; Carattini, Stefano ; Baranzini, Andrea ; Varone, Frederic ; Vohringer, Frank.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:68:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-017-0133-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Culture, compliance, and confidentiality: Taxpayer behavior in the United States and Italy. (2017). Lee, Daniel ; Laury, Susan ; Alm, James ; Wallace, Sally ; Bernasconi, Michele.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:140:y:2017:i:c:p:176-196.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Human Ethics and Virtues: Rethinking the Homo-Economicus Model. (2017). Dhami, Sanjit.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6836.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Honesty or Dishonesty of Taxpayer Communications in an Enforcement Regime. (2016). McKee, Michael ; Bruner, David ; Alm, James.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:tul:wpaper:1620.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. When You Know Your Neighbour Pays Taxes: Information, Peer Effects, and Tax Compliance. (2016). McKee, Michael ; Alm, James ; Bloomquist, Kim M.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:tul:wpaper:1619.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Willing to Pay? Tax Compliance in Britain and Italy: An Experimental Analysis. (2016). Steinmo, Sven ; Ottone, Stefania ; Zhang, Nan ; Andrighetto, Giulia ; Ponzano, Ferruccio.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0150277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Carbon offsets out of the woods? The acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes. (2016). Carattini, Stefano ; Baranzini, Andrea ; Borzykowski, Nicolas.
    In: GRI Working Papers.
    RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp257.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Tax compliance behaviour during the crisis: the case of Greek SMEs. (2016). Daskalakis, Nikolaos ; Rapanos, Vassilis T ; Kaplanoglou, Georgia.
    In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:42:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10657-016-9547-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Cheating in the Lab Predicts Fraud in the Field: An Experiment in Public Transportations. (2016). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Galeotti, Fabio ; DAI, ZHIXIN.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9702.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Cheating in the Lab Predicts Fraud in the Field An Experiment in Public Transportations. (2016). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Galeotti, Fabio ; DAI, ZHIXIN.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01265696.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Cheating in the Lab Predicts Fraud in the Field: An Experiment in Public Transportations. (2016). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Galeotti, Fabio ; DAI, ZHIXIN.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gat:wpaper:1605.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Endogenous context in a dictator game. (2016). Thunstrom, Linda ; Shogren, Jason ; McEvoy, David ; Cherry, Todd.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:65:y:2016:i:c:p:117-120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Honesty or dishonesty of taxpayer communications in an enforcement regime. (2016). McKee, Michael ; Bruner, David ; Alm, James.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:56:y:2016:i:c:p:85-96.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Delayed feedback on tax audits affects compliance and fairness perceptions. (2016). Mittone, Luigi ; Kirchler, Erich ; Kogler, Christoph.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:124:y:2016:i:c:p:81-87.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-29 23:04:09 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.