create a website

Measuring natural source dependence. (2024). Kemel, Emmanuel ; Gutierrez, Cedric.
In: Experimental Economics.
RePEc:kap:expeco:v:27:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10683-024-09822-4.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 68

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Attitudes towards natural sources of uncertainty for gains and losses. (2025). el Guide, Mohamed ; Kaouane, Yassine ; Mun, Sonia ; Zouiten, Hayat.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:98:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-024-10018-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Testing source influence on ambiguity reaction: Preference and insensitivity. (2024). Santoni, Michele ; Lotito, Gianna ; Maffioletti, Anna.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:69:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11166-024-09444-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abdellaoui, M., Baillon, A., Placido, L., & Wakker, P. P. (2011). The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. American Economic Review, 101(2), 695–723.

  2. Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & Gutierrez, C. (2023). Unpacking overconfident behavior when betting on oneself. Management Science. (Forthcoming).

  3. Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., Kemel, E., & L’Haridon, O. (2021). Measuring beliefs under ambiguity. Operations Research, 69(2), 599–612.

  4. Abdellaoui, M., Kemel, E., Panin, A., & Vieider, F. M. (2019). Measuring time and risk preferences in an integrated framework. Games and Economic Behavior, 115, 459–469.

  5. Anantanasuwong, K., Kouwenberg, R., Mitchell, O. S., & Peijnenberg, K. (2019). Ambiguity attitudes about investments: Evidence from the field. Working paper. National Bureau of Economic Research, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3336513 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Armantier, O., & Treich, N. (2013). Eliciting beliefs: Proper scoring rules, incentives, stakes and hedging. European Economic Review, 62, 17–40.

  7. Attema, A. E., Bleichrodt, H., & L’Haridon, O. (2018). Ambiguity preferences for health. Health Economics, 27(11), 1699–1716.

  8. Baillon, A. (2008). Eliciting subjective probabilities through exchangeable events: An advantage and a limitation. Decision Analysis, 5(2), 76–87.

  9. Baillon, A., & Bleichrodt, H. (2015). Testing ambiguity models through the measurement of probabilities for gains and losses. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 7(2), 77–100.

  10. Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., & Spinu, V. (2020). Searching for the reference point. Management Science, 66(1), 93–112.

  11. Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., Keskin, U., L’Haridon, O., & Li, C. (2017). The effect of learning on ambiguity attitudes. Management Science, 64(5), 2181–2198.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., Li, C., & Wakker, P. P. (2021). Belief hedges: Measuring ambiguity for all events and all models. Journal of Economic Theory, 198, 105353.

  13. Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., Li, C., & Wakker, P. P. (2023). Source theory: A tractable and positive ambiguity theory. Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Baillon, A., Huang, Z., Selim, A., & Wakker, P. P. (2018). Measuring ambiguity attitudes for all (natural) events. Econometrica, 86(5), 1839–1858.

  15. Barham, B. L., Chavas, J.-P., Fitz, D., Salas, V. R., & Schechter, L. (2014). The roles of risk and ambiguity in technology adoption. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 97, 204–218.

  16. Berger, L., Bleichrodt, H., & Eeckhoudt, L. (2013). Treatment decisions under ambiguity. Journal of Health Economics, 32(3), 559–569.

  17. Bohnet, I., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004). Trust, risk and betrayal. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 467–484.

  18. Bouchouicha, R., Martinsson, P., Medhin, H., & Vieider, F. M. (2017). Stake effects on ambiguity attitudes for gains and losses. Theory and Decision, 83(1), 19–35.

  19. Bruhin, A., Fehr-Duda, H., & Epper, T. (2010). Risk and rationality: Uncovering heterogeneity in probability distortion. Econometrica, 78(4), 1375–1412.

  20. Bruttel, L., Bulutay, M., Cornand, C., Heinemann, F., & Zylbersztejn, A. (2022). Measuring strategic-uncertainty attitudes. Experimental Economics, 26, 1–28.

  21. Cabantous, L. (2007). Ambiguity aversion in the field of insurance: Insurers’ attitude to imprecise and conflicting probability estimates. Theory and Decision, 62(3), 219–240.

  22. Calford, E. M. (2020). Uncertainty aversion in game theory: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 176, 720–734.

  23. Chark, R., & Chew, S. H. (2015). A neuroimaging study of preference for strategic uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 50, 209–227.

  24. Chew, S. H., Ebstein, R. P., & Zhong, S. (2012). Ambiguity aversion and familiarity bias: Evidence from behavioral and gene association studies. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 44(1), 1–18.

  25. Croitoru, B., & Lu, L. (2014). Asset pricing in a monetary economy with heterogeneous beliefs. Management Science, 61(9), 2203–2219.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Cutler, D. M., Finkelstein, A., & McGarry, K. (2008). Preference heterogeneity and insurance markets: Explaining a puzzle of insurance. American Economic Review, 98(2), 157–62.

  27. de Lara Resende, J. G., & Wu, G. (2010). Competence effects for choices involving gains and losses. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 40(2), 109–132.

  28. DeJarnette, P., Dillenberger, D., Gottlieb, D., & Ortoleva, P. (2020). Time lotteries and stochastic impatience. Econometrica, 88(2), 619–656.

  29. Dimmock, S. G., Kouwenberg, R., & Wakker, P. P. (2016). Ambiguity attitudes in a large representative sample. Management Science, 62(5), 1363–1380.

  30. Dimmock, S. G., Kouwenberg, R., Mitchell, O. S., & Peijnenburg, K. (2016). Ambiguity aversion and household portfolio choice puzzles: Empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 119(3), 559–577.

  31. Easley, D., & O’Hara, M. (2009). Ambiguity and nonparticipation: The role of regulation. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(5), 1817–1843.

  32. Eichberger, J., & Kelsey, D. (2011). Are the treasures of game theory ambiguous? Economic Theory, 48(2–3), 313–339.

  33. Eichberger, J., Kelsey, D., & Schipper, B. C. (2008). Granny versus game theorist: Ambiguity in experimental games. Theory and Decision, 64(2–3), 333.

  34. Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643–669.

  35. Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2018). Global evidence on economic preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(4), 1645–1692.

  36. Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 585–603.

  37. Fox, C. R., & Ülkümen, G. (2011). Distinguishing two dimensions of uncertainty. In Brun, G. Keren, G. Kirkebøen, & H. Montgomery (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, judging, and decision making (pp. 21–35). Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Fox, C. R., & Weber, M. (2002). Ambiguity aversion, comparative ignorance, and decision context. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(1), 476–498.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Gaudecker, H.-M., Van Soest, A., & Wengstrom, E. (2011). Heterogeneity in risky choice behavior in a broad population. American Economic Review, 101(2), 664–94.

  40. Gaudecker, H.-M., Wogrolly, A., & Zimpelmann, C. (2022). The distribution of ambiguity attitudes. Working Paper.

  41. Goldstein, W. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1987). Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review, 94(2), 236.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Heath, C., & Tversky, A. (1991). Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4(1), 5–28.

  43. Hoy, M., Peter, R., & Richter, A. (2014). Take-up for genetic tests and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 48, 111–133.

  44. Ivanov, A. (2011). Attitudes to ambiguity in one-shot normal-form games: An experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior, 71(2), 366–394.

  45. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

  46. Kelsey, D., & Le Roux, S. (2015). An experimental study on the effect of ambiguity in a coordination game. Theory and Decision, 79, 667–688.

  47. Kelsey, D., & Le Roux, S. (2017). Dragon slaying with ambiguity: Theory and experiments. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 19(1), 178–197.

  48. Kilka, M., & Weber, M. (2001). What determines the shape of the probability weighting function under uncertainty? Management Science, 47(12), 1712–1726.

  49. Klibanoff, P., Marinacci, M., & Mukerji, S. (2005). A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica, 73(6), 1849–1892.

  50. Kreps, D. M., & Porteus, E. L. (1978). Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica, 46(1), 185–200.

  51. L’Haridon, O., & Vieider, F. M. (2019). All over the map: A worldwide comparison of risk preferences. Quantitative Economics, 10(1), 185–215.

  52. Lau, S. T., Ng, L., & Zhang, B. (2010). The world price of home bias. Journal of Financial Economics, 97(2), 191–217.

  53. Li, C. (2017). Are the poor worse at dealing with ambiguity? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 54(3), 239–268.

  54. Li, C., Turmunkh, U., & Wakker, P. P. (2019). Trust as a decision under ambiguity. Experimental Economics, 22(1), 51–75.

  55. Li, C., Turmunkh, U., & Wakker, P. P. (2020). Social and strategic ambiguity versus betrayal aversion. Games and Economic Behavior, 123, 272–287.

  56. Li, Z., Müller, J., Wakker, P. P., & Wang, T. V. (2017). The rich domain of ambiguity explored. Management Science, 64(7), 3227–3240.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Millner, A., Dietz, S., & Heal, G. (2013). Scientific ambiguity and climate policy. Environmental & Resource Economics, 55(1), 21.

  58. Murphy, R. O., & ten Brincke, R. H. (2017). Hierarchical maximum likelihood parameter estimation for cumulative prospect theory: Improving the reliability of individual risk parameter estimates. Management Science, 64(1), 308–326.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Muthukrishnan, A., Wathieu, L., & Xu, A. J. (2009). Ambiguity aversion and the preference for established brands. Management Science, 55(12), 1933–1941.

  60. Prelec, D. (1998). The probability weighting function. Econometrica, 66(3), 497–527.

  61. Pulford, B. D., & Colman, A. M. (2007). Ambiguous games: Evidence for strategic ambiguity aversion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(8), 1083–1100.

  62. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. DoverPress.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press.

  64. Trautmann, S. T., & van de Kuilen, G. (2015). Ambiguity attitudes. The Wiley Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making, 1, 89–116.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Tversky, A., & Fox, C. R. (1995). Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psychological Review, 102(2), 269.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. van de Kuilen, G., & Wakker, P. P. (2011). The midweight method to measure attitudes toward risk and ambiguity. Management Science, 57(3), 582–598.

  67. Viscusi, W. K., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2015). Regulating ambiguous risks: The less than rational regulation of pharmaceuticals. The Journal of Legal Studies, 44(S2), S387–S422.

  68. Wakker, P. P. (2004). On the composition of risk preference and belief. Psychological Review, 111(1), 236.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The missing link: unifying risk taking and time discounting. (2018). Epper, Thomas ; Fehr-Duda, Helga.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. A Tale of Two Tails: On the Coexistence of Overweighting and Underweighting of Rare Extreme Events. (2017). Epper, Thomas ; Fehr-Duda, Helga.
    In: Economics Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:usg:econwp:2017:05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. No Two Experiments are Identical. (2017). Halevy, Yoram ; Epstein, Larry.
    In: Microeconomics.ca working papers.
    RePEc:ubc:pmicro:yoram_halevy-2014-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Certainty Preference, Random Choice, and Loss Aversion: A Comment on Violence and Risk Preference: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan. (2016). Vieider, Ferdinand.
    In: Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2016-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Ellsberg re-revisited: An experiment disentangling model uncertainty and risk aversion. (2016). Bosetti, Valentina ; Berger, Loic.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:576.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. PROBABILISTIC SOPHISTICATION, SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY, AND COGNITIVE ABILITY: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE. (2016). Almeida, Sergio ; Rangel, Marcos.
    In: Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting].
    RePEc:anp:en2014:131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Quantum decision making by social agents. (2015). Yukalov, V. I. ; Sornette, D..
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1202.4918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Measuring Ambiguity Preferences. (2014). Schröder, David ; Cavatorta, Elisa ; Schroder, David.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc14:100593.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Behavioral determinants of home bias - theory and experiment. (2014). Dlugosch, Dennis ; Wang, Mei ; Horn, Kristian.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2014-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Insensitivity to Prices in a Dictator Game. (2014). Mishagina, Natalia ; Engle-Warnick, Jim.
    In: CIRANO Working Papers.
    RePEc:cir:cirwor:2014s-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Buying and Selling Risk - An Experiment Investigating Evaluation Asymmetries. (2014). Soraperra, Ivan ; Ploner, Matteo ; Güth, Werner ; Guth, Werner.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4575.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Comparing Decisions under Compound Risk and Ambiguity: The Importance of Cognitive Skills. (2014). Prokosheva, Sasha .
    In: CERGE-EI Working Papers.
    RePEc:cer:papers:wp525.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. A Test of Mechanical Ambiguity. (2014). Oechssler, Jörg ; Roomets, Alex.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0555.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Risk preferences and development revisited: A field experiment in Vietnam. (2013). Vieider, Ferdinand ; Martinsson, Peter ; Truong, Nghi ; Nam, Pham Khanh.
    In: Discussion Papers, WZB Junior Research Group Risk and Development.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbrad:spii2013403.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Learning under ambiguity: An experiment using initial public offerings on a stock market. (2013). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Bleichrodt, Han ; Baillon, Aurelien ; Keskin, Umut ; Li, Author-Name Chen .
    In: Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen).
    RePEc:tut:cremwp:201331.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. La rationalité à l’épreuve de l’économie comportementale. (2013). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Denant-Boèmont, Laurent ; Denant-Boemont, Laurent.
    In: Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen).
    RePEc:tut:cremwp:201323.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Variation in risk seeking behavior following large losses: A natural experiment. (2013). Torgler, Benno ; Page, Lionel ; Savage, David A..
    In: QuBE Working Papers.
    RePEc:qut:qubewp:wp007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. On the impossibility of insider trade in rational expectations equilibria. (2013). Zimper, Alexander.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pre:wpaper:201379.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The impact of statistical learning on violations of the sure-thing principle. (2013). Zimper, Alexander ; Nicholls, Nicky ; Romm, Aylit .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pre:wpaper:201364.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Do ambiguity effects survive in experimental asset markets?. (2013). Weitzel, Utz ; Rau, Holger ; Füllbrunn, Sascha ; Fullbrunn, Sascha.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:44700.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. To Give or Not to Give: The Price of Contributing and the Provision of Public Goods. (2013). Goeschl, Timo ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19332.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Ambiguity Aversion and Household Portfolio Choice: Empirical Evidence. (2013). Peijnenburg, Kim ; Mitchell, Olivia ; Kouwenberg, Roy ; Dimmock, Stephen.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:18743.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. A Life-Cycle Model with Ambiguous Survival Beliefs. (2013). Zimper, Alexander ; Ludwig, Alexander ; Groneck, Max.
    In: Working Paper Series in Economics.
    RePEc:kls:series:0063.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Buying and Selling Risk - An Experiment Investigating Evaluation Asymmetries. (2013). Soraperra, Ivan ; Ploner, Matteo ; Güth, Werner ; Guth, Werner.
    In: Jena Economics Research Papers.
    RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2013-047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The Impact of Political Uncertainty: A Robust Control Approach. (2013). Svec, Justin ; Baumann, Robert.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hcx:wpaper:1306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. A human experiment on inventory decisions under supply uncertainty. (2013). Di Mauro, Carmela ; D'Urso, D. ; Ancarani, A..
    In: International Journal of Production Economics.
    RePEc:eee:proeco:v:142:y:2013:i:1:p:61-73.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Ambiguity in Performance Pay: An Online Experiment. (2013). Johnson, David ; Cooper, David.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:clg:wpaper:2013-27.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The incorporation of subjective risks into choice experiments to test scenario adjustment. (2013). Cerroni, Simone ; Notaro, Sandra ; Raffaelli, Roberta ; Shaw, Douglass W..
    In: 2013 Second Congress, June 6-7, 2013, Parma, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:aiea13:149894.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Responsibility effects in decision making under risk. (2012). Vieider, Ferdinand ; Pahlke, Julius ; Strasser, Sebastian .
    In: Discussion Papers, WZB Junior Research Group Risk and Development.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbrad:spii2012402.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Assessing Multiple Prior Models of Behaviour under Ambiguity. (2012). Hey, John ; conte, anna.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:yor:yorken:12/01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Social risk and ambiguity in the trust game. (2012). Weitzel, Utz ; Vyrastekova, Jana ; Fairley, Kim ; Sanfey, Alan .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:42302.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Aggregating imprecise or conflicting beliefs: An experimental investigation using modern ambiguity theories. (2012). Wakker, Peter ; Baillon, Aurelien ; Cabantous, Laure.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:44:y:2012:i:2:p:115-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Are Groups more Rational than Individuals? A Review of Interactive Decision Making in Groups. (2012). Kocher, Martin ; Kausel, Edgar ; Kugler, Tamar.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_3701.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Do monetary incentives and chained questions affect the validity of risk estimates elicited via the Exchangeability Method? An experimental investigation. (2012). Shaw, W. ; Cerroni, Simone ; Notaro, Sandra.
    In: 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil.
    RePEc:ags:iaae12:125468.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. The validity of risk estimates elicited via the Exchangeability Method: An experimental investigation of consumers’ perceived health risks. (2012). Shaw, W. ; Cerroni, Simone ; Notaro, Sandra.
    In: 2012 First Congress, June 4-5, 2012, Trento, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:aieacp:124100.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. The Explanatory and Predictive Power of Non Two-Stage-Probability Theories of Decision Making Under Ambiguity. (2011). Pace, Noemi ; Hey, John.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ven:wpaper:2011_12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Do Monetary Incentives and Chained Questions Affect the Validity of Risk Estimates Elicited via the Exchangeability Method? An Experimental Investigation. (2011). Shaw, W. ; Cerroni, Simone ; Notaro, Sandra.
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:trn:utwpde:1110.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Higher Order Risk Attitudes, Demographics, and Financial Decisions. (2011). Trautmann, Stefan ; Noussair, Charles ; Kuilen, Gijs ; van de Kuilen, G..
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiucen:e49b7f3c-c3f2-4d37-8d24-076f102c0940.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Asset Priving and Ambiguity: Empirical Evidence. (2011). Izhakian, Yehuda ; Brenner, Menachem.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ste:nystbu:11-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Reference dependent ambiguity aversion: theory and experiment. (2011). Weitzel, Utz ; Qiu, Jianying.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:35289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Risk Taking of Executives under Different Incentive Contracts: Experimental Evidence. (2011). Vieider, Ferdinand ; Lefebvre, Mathieu.
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:lmu:muenec:12210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?. (2011). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Vieider, Ferdinand ; Lefebvre, Mathieu.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:4:p:615-641.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Preference towards control in risk taking: Control, no control, or randomize?. (2011). Li, King King.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:43:y:2011:i:1:p:39-63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Is imprecise knowledge better than conflicting expertise? Evidence from insurers’ decisions in the United States. (2011). Michel-Kerjan, Erwann ; Cabantous, Laure ; Kunreuther, Howard ; Hilton, Denis.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:42:y:2011:i:3:p:211-232.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Kindness, confusion, or … ambiguity?. (2011). Finocchiaro Castro, Massimo ; Di Mauro, Carmela.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:14:y:2011:i:4:p:611-633.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Willingness to Pay for Individual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions: Evidence from a Large Field Experiment. (2011). Goeschl, Timo ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0517.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Giving in a Large Economy: Price vs. Non-Price Effects in a Field Experiment. (2011). Goeschl, Timo ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Responsibility Effects in Decision Making under Risk. (2010). Vieider, Ferdinand ; Strasser, Sebastian ; Pahlke, Julius .
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:lmu:muenec:12115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Is Imprecise Knowledge Better than Conflicting Expertise? Evidence from Insurers’ Decisions in the United States. (2010). Michel-Kerjan, Erwann ; Cabantous, Laure ; Kunreuther, Howard ; Hilton, Denis.
    In: ICBBR Working Papers.
    RePEc:bbr:workpa:7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. The Explanatory and Predictive Power of Non Two-Stage-Probability Theories of Decision Making Under Ambiguity. (). Pace, Noemi ; Hey, John.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:yor:yorken:11/22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-04 11:22:03 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.